Journal Logo

STUDIES

Duration of Dermatitis Before Patch Test Appointment Is Associated With Distance to Clinic and County Poverty Rate

Rodriguez-Homs, Larissa G. MBS; Liu, Beiyu PhD; Green, Cynthia L. PhD; Sofela, Olamiji MBchB; Atwater, Amber Reck MD§

Author Information
doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000581
  • Free

Abstract

In the United States, more than 13 million patients sought medical treatment for contact dermatitis in 2013, with costs exceeding US $1.5 billion.1 In addition to being a common skin disease, contact dermatitis is also associated with significant impairment in quality of life.2–7 Consequently, early diagnosis improves patient outcomes and, particularly, the emotional impact on patient quality of life.5

Health care access is affected by many factors. Race, ethnicity, age, sex, rural-urban status, occupation, travel distance, insurance status, and provider supply may all influence dermatologic care.8–19 Factors that have been linked to allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) specifically include race, ethnicity, age, sex, rural-urban status, and occupation.9–14 However, the influence of travel distance, insurance status, and other socioeconomic factors on the management and outcomes of ACD is not well described.

Prior studies have documented that distance from diagnosing provider affects the severity, treatment adherence, and health outcomes of dermatologic diseases.8,15–17 As contact dermatitis is a common skin disease that affects patient quality of life,2,3,5–7,10 we sought to determine whether travel distance along with other socioeconomic factors affect the duration of dermatitis before presentation to the contact dermatitis clinic. The primary objective was to assess the effect of distance to the Duke Contact Dermatitis and Patch Testing Center on duration of dermatitis before presentation. Secondary objectives were to assess the effects of sex, race, payor group, county poverty rates, and rural-urban status on the duration of dermatitis before presentation.

METHODS

Study Design and Data

This retrospective study was approved by the Duke Health Institutional Review Board; waiver of consent was obtained. The study included patients who underwent patch testing at the Duke Contact Dermatitis and Patch Testing Center from March 1, 2012, to August 1, 2018. Patients from North Carolina and its bordering states (Georgia, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia) were included in the analysis. If duration of dermatitis was not recorded or if the patient did not have active dermatitis (in the case of a concern for metal allergy before implant placement), the patient was excluded from the study. Patients with prior history of patch testing or with missing zip code or socioeconomic data were also excluded from the analysis. Patient addresses were mapped via zip code, and distance to the Duke Contact Dermatitis and Patch Testing Center was calculated.

Data were obtained from 3 sources: Duke Enterprise Data Unified Content Explorer (DEDUCE), a Web-based clinical research and quality improvement query tool that allows for flexible search of data hierarchies20; Clarity, Duke's main electronic medical record data warehouse; and chart review of the Duke electronic medical record (LRH).

Variables

The following clinical and demographic variables were obtained: sex, race, ethnicity, age, payor group, zip code and county of residence, duration of dermatitis, county poverty rates, and rural-urban status. Sex, race, and ethnicity were determined with the DEDUCE tool. Age, payor group, zip code, and county of residence at the time of clinic visit were determined with a Clarity query. Duration of dermatitis was defined as patient-reported time from the first sign of dermatitis to the first encounter with the contact dermatitis specialist and was converted to time in months by LRH. In cases of lifelong dermatitis with recent worsening of disease, the onset of dermatitis was recorded as date of worsening of dermatitis. County poverty rate, which represents the percentage of residents in each county living below the poverty threshold, was obtained from US Census Bureau 2000 census information.21 Rural-urban status was determined using 2013 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes from the US Department of Agriculture.22

Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables such as distance, duration of dermatitis, age at time of encounter, and county poverty rate were summarized using the mean, standard deviation, median, 25th (Q1) and 75th (Q3) percentiles, and range as appropriate based on the data distribution. Categorical variables, such as sex, race, ethnicity, payor group, and rural-urban status, were summarized with frequency counts and percentages. The comparison of dermatitis duration across categorical groups was done using the Kruskal-Wallis test.

Because the distribution of duration of dermatitis was right skewed, a generalized linear model with log normal distribution was fit to study the association between duration of dermatitis and the distance to the contact dermatitis clinic after adjusting for age, sex, race, insurance payor, county poverty rate, and rural-urban status. The distance was calculated as the geodetic distance in miles between the zip code of the patient's address and the zip code of the Duke Dermatology Contact Dermatitis and Patch Testing Center (27707). The centroid of each zip code (the longitude/latitude point) was used in the calculation. Because the closest distance from a different zip code to the contact dermatitis clinic zip code is 0.8 miles, we assigned 0.4 miles as the distance for those patients who had the same zip code as the clinic. Results are presented using the exponentiated regression estimate (ratio of the geometric mean [median]) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC).

RESULTS

We identified 1552 patients who completed patch testing between March 1, 2012, and August 1, 2018; 1131 patients who met inclusion criteria were included in the analysis (72.9%). Mean age was 50.6 ± 17.7 years, with 818 female (72.3%) and 313 male (27.7%) patients. Additional study demographics can be reviewed in Table 1. The median duration of dermatitis before the first clinic encounter was 14 months (Q1 = 7 months, Q3 = 36 months; Table 2). The median distance from the patient's zip code to the clinic was 18 miles (Q1 = 7 miles, Q3 = 45.9 miles; Table 1). Ninety percent of the patients traveled less than 90 miles to reach the clinic; the remaining 10% traveled between 90 and 560 miles. Visual distribution map of patient zip code locations can be reviewed in Figure 1.

TABLE 1
TABLE 1:
Demographics
TABLE 2
TABLE 2:
Univariable Analysis of Duration of Dermatitis in Months
Figure 1
Figure 1:
Study population map. Each data point represents 1 patient zip code. The yellow star indicates the location of the Duke Contact Dermatitis and Patch Test Clinic.

Univariable analysis of duration of dermatitis revealed no statistical association with sex, insurance payor, county poverty rate, rural-urban status, or race (Table 2). Trends were noted for longer duration of dermatitis for insurance payor, county poverty rate, rural-urban status, and race.

In the generalized linear model analysis, distance to the patch test clinic was statistically significantly associated with duration of dermatitis (P < 0.001; Table 3). For each 50-mile increase in distance from the patient's zip code to the patch test clinic, the median duration of dermatitis increased by 17.9% (95% CI, 7.4%–29.4%; Fig. 2). The county poverty rate was also statistically significantly associated with duration of dermatitis (P = 0.032). For every 5% increase in the county poverty rate, the median duration of dermatitis increased by 16.3% (95% CI, 1.3%–33.6%). No statistically significant correlations were found between duration of dermatitis and age, sex, race, payor group, or rural-urban status.

TABLE 3
TABLE 3:
Predictors of Duration of Dermatitis
Figure 2
Figure 2:
Bivariate relationship between duration of dermatitis and distance to patch test clinic. The natural log of duration of dermatitis is plotted against distance. The line represents the linear regression line.

DISCUSSION

In this retrospective analysis, distance to the Duke Contact Dermatitis and Patch Test Clinic and county poverty rate were statistically significantly associated with duration of dermatitis before patch test clinic presentation. There was not a statistical association between age, sex, race, payor group, or rural-urban status on the duration of dermatitis. However, we saw trends for payor group, rural-urban status, and race. These trends indicate that patients with Veterans Affairs (VA) and Tricare and Medicaid insurance, those living in rural areas, and black patients had the longest duration of dermatitis before presentation to the patch test clinic.

Prior studies have examined the relationship between distance to provider and stage at diagnosis for cancer patients8,15,17,23–25 and phototherapy adherence.16 Jain et al17 found that patients who traveled more than 300 miles were more likely to be diagnosed with advanced stage Merkel cell carcinoma. Similarly, a study in North Carolina found that, for each mile increase in distance to the diagnosing provider, melanoma Breslow thickness increased by 0.6%.8 Weng et al16 found that patients who lived farther than 5 miles from the phototherapy center were less likely to adhere to phototherapy. In this study, distance from the clinic was associated with duration of dermatitis before presentation to clinic. It is not difficult to imagine that distance could be a barrier for physicians hoping to send their patients for specialty patch testing and for physician knowledge that specialty referral opportunities exist. Similarly, patients may be less accepting of long travel distances for appointments or may not have resources to make longer trips. Further exploration of the source of barriers to specialty patch test referrals is needed.

Poverty status has been associated with a lesser likelihood of receiving biventricular pacing in heart failure patients26 and reduced general survival time and breast cancer survival time in breast cancer patients.27 Our study identified a significant association between county poverty rate and duration of dermatitis before patch test clinic presentation. It should be kept in mind that in our study, only 29 patients were identified as living in a county with a greater than 20% poverty rate; this small sample size may affect applicability of results. In addition, county poverty rate does not confirm individual poverty status, making this data point potentially less useful. Further studies should investigate the effect of poverty on duration of dermatitis in a larger population.

Racial disparities in medicine are well documented. Specific to dermatology, an analysis of federal survey data revealed that the annual likelihood of black and Asian patients to see a dermatologist was lower than that of white patients18; in another study, black and Asian patients with bullous pemphigoid were more likely to be admitted to the hospital than white patients.28 In addition, surgical delay of treatment of melanoma has been reported to be more likely if patients are nonwhite.19 Few studies have addressed US-based demographic factors such as race or ethnicity in the setting of ACD. The North American Contact Dermatitis Group investigated race and ethnicity in the setting of patch test results.13 The study population included 7.1% black patients and 92% white patients. They reported that black patients were more likely to have baseline atopic dermatitis and asthma, were more likely to receive a final diagnosis of atopic dermatitis, and had statistically different rates of patch test reactions. The etiology of the differences in patch test reactions was not known, but they hypothesized that they were related to exposure patterns. The Pediatric Contact Dermatitis Registry evaluated the distribution of race and ethnicity in a patch test population across 34 US states in 2015 to 2016; this study included 12% black patients, 15.7% Hispanic patients, 7.1% Asian patients, and 57% white, non-Hispanic patients.14,29 The authors theorized that minority groups may not be adequately represented in patch test studies because of a lack of geographic diversity in researchers along with socioeconomic factors, such as language barriers, low rate of medical insurance coverage, lower income, and limited knowledge of health services.14

A US population statistics report from 2017 documents 14.6% black individuals30; our study included 15.6% black patients, which closely parallels these statistics. The 2017 North Carolina Census Bureau, however, reported a black population of 24%.31 Although our study numbers are representative of the US black population, there is still room for improvement in terms of representing the black population of North Carolina. In addition, our study does not adequately represent the Hispanic/Latino community of North Carolina; our study included 1.9% Hispanic/Latino and 9% of North Carolina residents identify as Hispanic/Latino.32 Better representation of minorities in patch test and contact dermatitis research is necessary and will help us to better understand disease processes and management in patients with skin of color.

Insurance type has been associated with decreased frequency of dermatology visits,18 later stage diagnosis and surgical delay in melanoma,19,33 and morbidity and mortality in bullous pemphigoid.28 Mulcahy et al18 reported that Medicaid enrolled patients were less likely to see a dermatologist than those with private insurance and were less likely to receive a diagnosis from a provider. Another study reported that Medicaid patients are also more likely to present with later stage melanoma33 and experience surgical delays compared with those with private insurance.19 Ren et al28 reported that bullous pemphigoid patients with Medicaid and Medicare have increased hospitalization rates and those with Medicaid have increased mortality rates. Similarly, our study identified a trend that patients with VA and Tricare insurance and Medicaid insurance had a longer duration of dermatitis before presentation to the clinic. Fewer published studies exist on civilian dermatology access for VA- and Tricare-insured patients, possibly because many of these patients are cared for within the VA system or because they are pooled with other insurance types in studies. Analysis of a larger population of patients with VA and Tricare and Medicaid insurance may be necessary to further analyze this trend for delay in care.

Rural-urban status was the final factor noted to be a trend for increased duration of dermatitis. A 2009 dermatology workforce study in Ohio did not find a difference between urban and rural wait times to see a dermatologist.34 Although differences between rural and urban wait times are not traditionally noted for general dermatology care, it may be more difficult for rural patients to access comprehensive patch test dermatology care as these specialty centers are frequently located in metropolitan areas. This may be a factor of greater distance to the clinic, or could be related to cultural differences or preferences specific to medical care.

LIMITATIONS

There are several limitations to this study. First, this is a single-center study, thus, the distance to the Duke Contact Dermatitis and Patch Testing Center may not be representative of other patch test centers across the United States. In addition, several of the socioeconomic categories did not have large enough sample sizes to accurately compare the duration of dermatitis. Specifically, the American Indian/Alaskan Native, Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander, Multiracial, and other categories had small sample sizes. Similarly, the number of patients who identified as Hispanic/Latino and those designated as low poverty rate was low. Poverty rate was based on zip code and not income; this designation may have missed patients who individually qualified as poverty status. Human error could have been introduced as the duration of dermatitis was manually extracted from the electronic medical record. Finally, there is risk of recall bias, because the duration of dermatitis was recorded in the medical record based on patient recall.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified a significant relationship between duration of dermatitis and both distance to the contact dermatitis clinic and county poverty rates. In addition, trends existed for race, payor status, and rural-urban status. Further work is needed to explore these very important potential relationships between patient access to comprehensive contact dermatitis and patch testing care and demographic and socioeconomic factors.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank Leila Ledbetter, the Duke University Medical Center librarian.

REFERENCES

1. Lim HW, Collins SAB, Resneck JS Jr, et al. The burden of skin disease in the United States. J Am Acad Dermatol 2017;76(5):958–972.e952.
2. Ayala F, Nino M, Fabbrocini G, et al. Quality of life and contact dermatitis: a disease-specific questionnaire. Dermatitis 2010;21(2):84–90.
3. Woo PN, Hay IC, Ormerod AD. An audit of the value of patch testing and its effect on quality of life. Contact Dermatitis 2003;48(5):244–247.
4. Heisterberg MV, Menné T, Johansen JD. Fragrance allergy and quality of life - development and validation of a disease-specific quality of life instrument. Contact Dermatitis 2014;70(2):69–80.
5. Kadyk DL, McCarter K, Achen F, et al. Quality of life in patients with allergic contact dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003;49(6):1037–1048.
6. Kalboussi H, Kacem I, Aroui H, et al. Impact of allergic contact dermatitis on the quality of life and work productivity. Dermatol Res Pract 2019;1–8.
7. Kadyk DL, Hall S, Belsito DV. Quality of life of patients with allergic contact dermatitis: an exploratory analysis by gender, ethnicity, age, and occupation. Dermatitis 2004;15(3):117–124.
8. Stitzenberg KB, Thomas NE, Dalton K, et al. Distance to diagnosing provider as a measure of access for patients with melanoma. Arch Dermatol 2007;143(8):991–998.
9. Cashman MW, Reutemann PA, Ehrlich A. Contact dermatitis in the United States: epidemiology, economic impact, and workplace prevention. Dermatol Clin 2012;30(1):87–98.
10. Keegel T, Moyle M, Dharmage S, et al. The epidemiology of occupational contact dermatitis (1990–2007): a systematic review. Int J Dermatol 2009;48(6):571–578.
11. Morrone A, Bordignon V, Barnabas GA, et al. Clinical-epidemiological features of contact dermatitis in rural and urban communities in northern Ethiopia: correlation with environmental or occupational exposure. Int J Dermatol 2014;53(8):975–980.
12. Thyssen JP, Linneberg A, Menne T, et al. The epidemiology of contact allergy in the general population—prevalence and main findings. Contact Dermatitis 2007;57(5):287–299.
13. DeLeo VA, Alexis A, Warshaw EM, et al. The association of race/ethnicity and patch test results: North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 1998–2006. Dermatitis 2016;27(5):288–292.
14. McGowan MA, Goldenberg A, Jacob SE. Contact dermatitis in underrepresented minority children. Dermatitis 2018;29(2):97–99.
15. Snyder BM, Mounessa JS, Fazzari M, et al. Greater distance to an academic medical center is associated with poorer melanoma prognostic factors: the University of Colorado experience. Dermatol Online J 2017;23(11):1–6.
16. Weng QY, Buzney E, Joyce C, et al. Distance of travel to phototherapy is associated with early nonadherence: a retrospective cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol 2016;74(6):1256–1259.
17. Jain R, Menzin J, Lachance K, et al. Travel burden associated with rare cancers: the example of merkel cell carcinoma. Cancer Med 2019;8(5):2580–2586.
18. Mulcahy A, Mehrotra A, Edison K, et al. Variation in dermatologist visits by sociodemographic characteristics. J Am Acad Dermatol 2017;76(5):918–924.
19. Adamson AS, Zhou L, Baggett CD, et al. Association of delays in surgery for melanoma with insurance type. JAMA Dermatol 2017;153(11):1106–1113.
20. Horvath MM, Winfield S, Evans S, et al. The DEDUCE guided query tool: providing simplified access to clinical data for research and quality improvement. J Biomed Inform 2011;44(2):266–276.
21. Population by poverty status by counties. 2016. Available at: https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/dec/census-poverty.html. Accessed March 10, 2019.
22. Rural-urban continuum codes. 2016. Available at: https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/rural-urban-continuum-codes/. Accessed March 10, 2019.
23. Vetterlein MW, Löppenberg B, Karabon P, et al. Impact of travel distance to the treatment facility on overall mortality in US patients with prostate cancer. Cancer 2017;123(17):3241–3252.
24. Wills MJ, Whitman MV, English TM. Travel distance to cancer treatment facilities in the deep south. J Healthc Manag 2017;62(1):30–43.
25. Ringstrom MJ, Christian J, Bush ML, et al. Travel distance: impact on stage of presentation and treatment choices in head and neck cancer. Am J Otolaryngol 2018;39(5):575–581.
26. Casale JC, Wolf F, Pei Y, et al. Socioeconomic and ethnic disparities in the use of biventricular pacemakers in heart failure patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Ethn Dis 2013;23(3):275–280.
27. Delgado DJ, Lin WY, Coffey M. The role of Hispanic race/ethnicity and poverty in breast cancer survival. P R Health Sci J 1995;14(2):103–116.
28. Ren Z, Hsu DY, Brieva J, et al. Hospitalization, inpatient burden and comorbidities associated with bullous pemphigoid in the U.S.A. Br J Dermatol 2016;176(1):87–99.
29. Goldenberg A, Mousdicas N, Silverberg N, et al. Pediatric contact dermatitis registry inaugural case data. Dermatitis 2016;27(5):293–302.
30. Black demographics: the African American population. 2017. Available at: https://blackdemographics.com/. Accessed May 23, 2019.
31. Black demographics: North Carolina. 2017. Available at: https://blackdemographics.com/states/north-carolina/. Accessed June 7, 2019.
32. Tippett R. The Hispanic/Latino community in North Carolina (2017). 2017. Available at: https://demography.cpc.unc.edu/2017/10/10/the-hispaniclatino-community-in-north-carolina/. Accessed June 7, 2019.
33. Kooistra L, Chiang K, Dawes S, et al. Racial disparities and insurance status: an epidemiological analysis of Ohio melanoma patients. J Am Acad Dermatol 2018;78(5):998–1000.
34. Uhlenhake E, Brodell R, Mostow E. The dermatology work force: a focus on urban versus rural wait times. J Am Acad Dermatol 2009;61(1):17–22.
© 2020 American Contact Dermatitis Society. All Rights Reserved.