Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Positive Patch-Test Reactions to Propylene Glycol: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Analysis from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 1996 to 2006

Warshaw, Erin M.; Botto, Nina C.; Maibach, Howard I.; Fowler, Joseph F. Jr; Rietschel, Robert L.; Zug, Kathryn A.; Belsito, Donald V.; Taylor, James S.; DeLeo, Vincent A.; Pratt, Melanie D.; Sasseville, Denis; Storrs, Frances J.; Marks, James G. Jr; Mathias, Toby C.G.

doi: 10.2310/6620.2008.08039

Background: Propylene glycol (PG) may cause allergic or irritant contact dermatitis. It primarily functions as a vehicle, solvent, or emulsifier in cosmetics and topical medications.

Objectives: To characterize the prevalence of positive patch-test reactions to PG and the epidemiology of affected patients.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of cross-sectional data compiled by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group (NACDG) from 1996 to 2006.

Results: Of 23,359 patients, 810 (3.5%) had allergic patch-test reactions to 30% PG; 12.8% of the reactions were of definite clinical relevance (positive reaction to a personal product containing PG), 88.3% were considered to be currently relevant (definite, probable, or possible relevance), and 4.2% of reactions were occupation related, most commonly to mechanical and motor vehicle occupations. Common sources of PG were personal care products (creams, lotions, and cosmetics, 53.8%), topical corticosteroids (18.3%), and other topical medicaments (10.1%). In patients positive only to PG(n= 135), the face was most commonly affected (25.9%), followed by a scattered or generalized pattern (23.7%). The most common concomitant reactions included reactions toMyroxilon pereirae,fragrance mix, formaldehyde, bacitracin, methyldibromoglutaronitrile/phenoxyethanol, carba mix, and tixocortol pivalate.

Conclusions: In this select population of patients referred for patch testing, allergic reactions to PG were often currently clinically relevant but were rarely related to occupation. The most common sources were personal care products and topical corticosteroids.

From the North American Contact Dermatitis Group.

Funded by an American Contact Dermatitis Society Clinical Research Grant.

Reprints not available.

©2009American Contact Dermatitis Society, All Right Reserved
You currently do not have access to this article

To access this article:

Note: If your society membership provides full-access, you may need to login on your society website