Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence: The fecal incontinence severity index

Rockwood Todd H. Ph.D.; Church, James M. M.D.; Fleshman, James W. M.D.; Kane, Robert L. M.D.; Mavrantonis, Constantinos M.D.; Thorson, Alan G. M.D.; Wexner, Steven D. M.D.; Bliss, Donna R.N., Ph.D.; Lowry, Ann C. M.D.
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum: December 1999
doi: 10.1007/BF02236199
Original Contributions: PDF Only

PURPOSE: PURPOSE:The purpose of this research was to develop and evaluate a severity rating score for fecal incontinence, the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index.

METHODS: METHODS:The Fecal Incontinence Severity Index is based on a type × frequency matrix. The matrix includes four types of leakage commonly found in the fecal incontinent population: gas, mucus, and liquid and solid stool and five frequencies: one to three times per month, once per week, twice per week, once per day, and twice per day. The Fecal Incontinence Severity Index was developed using both colon and rectal surgeons and patient input for the specification of the weighting scores.

RESULTS: RESULTS:Surgeons and patients had very similar weightings for each of the type × frequency combinations; significant differences occurred for only 3 of the 20 different weights. The Fecal Incontinence Severity Index score of a group of patients with fecal incontinence (N = 118) demonstrated significant correlations with three of the four scales found in a fecal incontinence quality-of-life scale.

CONCLUSIONS: CONCLUSIONS:Evaluation of the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index indicates that the index is a tool that can be used to assess severity of fecal incontinence. Overall, patient and surgeon ratings of severity are similar, with minor differences associated with the accidental loss of solid stool.

Supported by a contract between the University of Minnesota Clinical Outcomes Research Center and The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgery and the Minnesota Colon and Rectal Foundation.

© The ASCRS 1999