Evaluation of a Progressive Mobility Protocol in Postoperative Cardiothoracic Surgical Patients : Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Clinical DIMENSION

Evaluation of a Progressive Mobility Protocol in Postoperative Cardiothoracic Surgical Patients

Floyd, Shawn DNP, RN, ACNP; Craig, Sarah W. PhD, RN, CNS; Topley, Darla DNP, RN, CNS; Tullmann, Dorothy PhD, RN, CNL

Author Information
Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing 35(5):p 277-282, September/October 2016. | DOI: 10.1097/DCC.0000000000000197

Abstract

Cardiothoracic surgical patients are at high risk for complications related to immobility, such as increased intensive care and hospital length of stay, intensive care unit readmission, pressure ulcer development, and deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolus. A progressive mobility protocol was started in the thoracic cardiovascular intensive care unit in a rural academic medical center. The purpose of the progressive mobility protocol was to increase mobilization of postoperative patients and decrease complications related to immobility in this unique patient population. A matched-pairs design was used to compare a randomly selected sample of the preintervention group (n = 30) to a matched postintervention group (n = 30). The analysis compared outcomes including intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, intensive care unit readmission occurrence, pressure ulcer prevalence, and deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism prevalence between the 2 groups. Although this comparison does not achieve statistical significance (P < .05) for any of the outcomes measured, it does show clinical significance in a reduction in hospital length of stay, intensive care unit days, in intensive care unit readmission rate, and a decline in pressure ulcer prevalence, which is the overall goal of progressive mobility. This study has implications for nursing, hospital administration, and therapy services with regard to staffing and cost savings related to fewer complications of immobility. Future studies with a larger sample size and other populations are warranted.

Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

You can read the full text of this article if you:

Access through Ovid