Secondary Logo

Journal Logo


Gastric Microbiota in a Low–Helicobacter pylori Prevalence General Population and Their Associations With Gastric Lesions

Ndegwa, Nelson MSc1; Ploner, Alexander PhD1; Andersson, Anders F. PhD2; Zagai, Ulrika PhD1; Andreasson, Anna PhD3; Vieth, Michael MD, PhD4; Talley, Nicholas J. MD, PhD5; Agreus, Lars MD, PhD3; Ye, Weimin MD, PhD1

Author Information
Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology: July 2020 - Volume 11 - Issue 7 - p e00191
doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000191



The human stomach, because of its harsh acidic environment, was largely considered a sterile environment until the discovery of Helicobacter pylori in 1982 (1), which provided a paradigm shift. Infection with H. pylori is the major cause of chronic gastritis, one of the most common lifelong serious diseases of the human stomach estimated to affect more than half of the world population (2). H. pylori gastritis may be nonatrophic or atrophic gastritis and in the latter form is characterized by the loss of normal mucosa glands in the antrum, corpus (and fundus), or both.

Corpus atrophy leads to impaired secretion of hydrochloric acid and intrinsic factor that places the patients at risk for malabsorption of vitamin B12 and some macronutrients. The hypochlorhydric stomach also becomes more favorable to colonization by oral microbiota, some of which are capable of producing carcinogens, such as acetaldehyde and nitrosamines (3,4). Although the risk of gastric cancer in people with normal/healthy stomach mucosa without H. pylori colonization is extremely low, it doubles in patients with nonatrophic H. pylori chronic gastritis (5) and rises exponentially with the progression to atrophic gastritis (6).

Although half of the world population is colonized by H. pylori, relatively few develop gastric cancer. Furthermore, populations vastly differ by H. pylori prevalence (2), with most Western populations having a low prevalence. In a Swedish study (7), a low–H. pylori prevalent population, an increase in atrophic gastritis among young adults was observed, and from the same population, it was reported that these individuals have an excess risk of developing gastric cancer compared with the general population (8).

Such observations lend support to the hypothesis that non–H. pylori microbiota might also be involved in the development of chronic gastritis with the eventual progression to gastric cancer through the multistep Correa cascade (3). Studies identifying dysbiosis (9) in the precancerous stomach (10) and limited gastric cancer animal models are also consistent with this hypothesis (11). With the increase in the incidence of gastric cancer in younger people in some parts of the world where H. pylori is declining (12,13), an understanding of the role of the non–H. pylori gastric microbiota in disease needs to be a priority.

Previous gastric microbiota studies have been hospital based in study design and/or had a small sample size, limiting generalizability (14–17). Moreover, different studies have made use of different sources of samples, such as gastric juice or tissue biopsy (14,15,18) or feces (19), have been conducted in populations with markedly different H. pylori prevalence rates (10,14–16), and have used reference groups, such as chronic gastritis not the healthy stomach (14,15). These factors affect comparability between studies, and although the early findings have been pivotal to our appreciation of the role of bacteria in the stomach, it is necessary to further expand and confirm the observations in larger studies with a population-based study design. In this study, we collected cytology brush samples during upper endoscopy with the aim of characterizing gastric non–H. pylori microbiota in a population-based cohort of 316 individuals from a low–H. pylori prevalence general population to (a) describe the mucosa-associated microbiome in the normal stomach, (b) compare the healthy stomach microbiota with early precancerous lesions and other disease states, and (c) assess whether H. pylori status affects bacterial diversity.


Study population and sample collection

This study is part of the LongGerd project, a longitudinal population-based study of gastrointestinal symptoms conducted in Sweden, with surveys in 1988, 1989, and 1995, that have been described previously (20,21). A follow-up study was set up in 2011–2012 described in detail elsewhere (22) and forms the basis for this project. Briefly, a series of surveys of abdominal/gastrointestinal symptoms were conducted in the municipality of Östhammar, Sweden. In January 2012, a follow-up project was set up and completed in April 2012 that involved residents of the municipality ages 20 years or older who were born on the 3rd, 12th, or 24th of each month. In total, 1,842 eligible subjects were asked to fill in several mailed questionnaires, and 1,034 participants who responded to the mail and were 79 years or younger were invited to endoscopy (with biopsies) and blood sampling. Eventually, 388 subjects aged between 20 and 79 years (203 women and 185 men, with a mean age of 54 years) underwent endoscopy examination and blood sample collection. The exclusion criteria included contraindications, older than 80 years, and those who could not read the mailed Abdominal Symptoms Questionnaire because it was written in Swedish. Detailed participant inclusion/exclusion criteria are illustrated in Figure 2 of an earlier published article (22) (see Figure S0, Supplementary Digital Content 1, A structured endoscopic protocol was used, and the findings registered according to the current standards (23). All procedures were video recorded for second opinion and consensus sessions. Gastric biopsies were taken from the cardia 2 cm below the gastroesophageal junction, the corpus, antrum, and any visible aberration, with 2 biopsies from each location. Biopsies were locally stored in a −80°C freezer and transported deep-frozen to the Department of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth, Germany, where histopathology was analyzed. Blood samples were also collected and tested for antibodies against H. pylori and gastric atrophy markers (gastrin-17 and pepsinogen I/II) and detected by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (GastroPanel, Biohit Plc, Helsinki, Finland). In addition, 2 endoscopic cytology brushing samples from the corpus and antrum were collected and stored in −80°C freezer.

DNA extraction and sequencing

DNA was extracted from endoscopy brushes by following the Mag Maxi Manual protocol of DNA Isolation Kit, Cat. No. 40403, LGC Genomics GmbH (Germany). Primers 341F (CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG) and 805R (GACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC) (24) targeting the V3-V4 regions of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene generated PCR amplicons using KAPA HiFi HotStart ReadyMix (2X) (KAPA Biosystems, Kit Code KK2602) in replicates. Replicates were pooled and barcoded using dual indexing primers in a second PCR amplification. Libraries were sent to the National Genomics Infrastructure/Science for Life Laboratories, Stockholm, for sequencing on Illumina MiSeq (Illumina Inc) using a 2 × 300-bp paired-end protocol (MiSeq Reagent Kits v3) (see Supplementary Results, Supplementary Digital Content 1,

Reads processing

Reads were processed following Uparse pipeline (25) with slight modifications. Usearch was used to trim off low-quality bases on the 3′ end, forward and reverse primers before merging reads to a minimum length of 350 bp. PhiX sequences were removed. Poor quality reads (with >1 expected errors) were removed. Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were clustered at 97% sequence identity excluding singletons. Chimeric sequences were removed using Uchime. OTU taxonomy assignment was performed using RDP database (26). Finally, OTU and taxonomy tables were generated and used for further analysis in R.

Sample grouping

Participants were a priori grouped into 5 main groups based on serology and histology: normal/H. pylori–negative gastritis, H. pylori gastritis without corpus atrophy, corpus atrophic gastritis, antral chemical gastritis, and post–H. pylori eradication/seropositive group. Those with other types of gastritis or those that could not be classified into the above-mentioned groups were excluded (see Supplementary Results, Supplementary Digital Content 1,

Statistical analysis

Sample data, OTU table, and phylogenetic tree were integrated into one object using Phyloseq (27). The data set was rarefied to 3,000 as the minimum count after prevalence filtering. Ordination and permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) analyses were performed using Vegan package (28). Differential abundance testing was performed using DESeq2 (29) with unrarefied data. All the previously mentioned analyses were conducted in R (30). Microbial co-occurrence network analysis was performed using SparCC (31) and visualized in Gephi (32). Microbial function prediction was performed using Picrust (33) and analyzed in STAMP software (34) and the results presented in the Supplementary Results (see Supplementary Digital Content 1,

Co-occurrence network analysis

We used SparCC to calculate correlations between OTU abundances in the microbiota data while accounting for their inherent sparsity and compositionality (31) (see Supplementary Results, Supplementary Digital Content 1, Identification of oral bacteria was performed by comparing OTU representative sequences against the Human Oral Microbiome (HOMD 16S rRNA RefSeq Version 15.1) database (35), and sequences with 100% identity match were considered of oral origin.


Approval for the study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Uppsala University (Dnr 2010/443).


The baseline characteristics of study participants are presented in Table 1. We sequenced 316 of 388 (81%) corpus cytology brushing samples and 318 of 388 (82%) antrum samples. The remaining samples either had little DNA or did not yield enough material for sequencing. Amplicon sequencing yielded an average of 29,030 (range: 11–198,812) reads per sample. Quality filtering was performed to obtain high-quality nonchimeric reads that were clustered at 97% identity into 737 nonsingleton OTUs. We included both positive (see Figures S1 and S2, Supplementary Digital Content 1, and negative control (see Figures S3 and S4, Supplementary Digital Content 1, samples. Furthermore, OTUs with ambiguous phylum annotations (missing or uncharacterized) or those with prevalence less than 3.8% of the total samples (6 samples) were filtered out leaving 9,157,556 (99.8%) reads, with each sample having an average of 28,980 (range: 11–198,790) reads and 434 OTUs in the filtered data set that was used for further analysis. Microbiota in the stomach anatomical sites of the corpus and antrum were found to be similar in alpha (see Figure S5, Supplementary Digital Content 1,; observed [P = 0.24], Shannon [P = 0.17]) and beta diversity estimates (PERMANOVA [P = 0.05], Bray–Curtis distances, principal coordinates analysis [PCoA] plot; see Figure S6, Supplementary Digital Content 1,

Table 1.
Table 1.:
Baseline characteristics of study participants

Normal stomach microbiota

OTUs in the normal stomach samples were classified into 16 bacterial phyla, with 9 phyla each constituting less than 1% of the total abundance. The 5 most abundant phyla accounting for 96% of the total reads in the normal stomach samples were Firmicutes (42%), Bacteroidetes (24%), Proteobacteria (17%), Actinobacteria (7%), and Fusobacteria (6%). Seventy-six families were identified within the normal stomach group with the 5 most abundant families (60% of families) being Streptococcaceae (23%), Prevotellaceae (23%), Veillonellaceae (7%), Bacillales incertae sedis XI (4%), and Lachnospiraceae (3%). At the genus level, 140 genera were identified in total within the normal stomach group of which Streptococcus (23%), Prevotella (22%), Veillonella (6%), Fusobacterium (5%), Gemella (4%), Neisseria (4%), and Haemophilus (4%) constituted the 7 top genera (68% of all genera) (Figure 1).

Figure 1.
Figure 1.:
A Krona plot showing the bacterial taxonomic composition at different levels of the normal stomach. The concentric circles start from the kingdom level (innermost circle) to the genus level (outermost circle).

The stomach in normal state is more diverse than that in other states

Analysis of the community structure using the Shannon index suggested that the normal group had the highest microbial diversity (3.16), followed by antral chemical gastritis (3.12), whereas the atrophic gastritis (3.04) and H. pylori gastritis (2.94) groups had the lowest alpha diversity. The overall group difference was statistically significant (P = 0.01) (Figure 2).

Figure 2.
Figure 2.:
Alpha diversity box plots of the analysis groups using observed and Shannon index diversity measures.

Diversity between groups

A clear separation of normal and antral chemical gastritis samples from H. pylori gastritis and atrophic gastritis samples was seen using the indirect ordination method of nonmetric multidimensional scaling with Bray–Curtis dissimilarity metric (Figure 3). Similar results were obtained with direct ordination using canonical correspondence analysis (see Figure S10 to S13, Supplementary Digital Content 1, The results from the above ordination-based analyses were similar after the removal of the OTU belonging to the genus Helicobacter.

Figure 3.
Figure 3.:
Plot of Bray–Curtis distances based on nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) (stress = 0.086). The ellipses represent 95% confidence intervals surrounding each group.

PERMANOVA was used to test whether samples differed between the groups (normal, atrophic gastritis, H. pylori gastritis, and antrum chemical gastritis) while adjusting for age at endoscopy and batch effects (sequencing libraries). The distribution and abundance of microbiota composition were significantly different (P = 0.001, permutations = 999, R2 = 6%) between the groups.

Differential abundance testing

We conducted the differential analysis using DESeq2 on raw prevalence filtered data set to identify bacteria responsible for separation of the different groups at the phylum and genus levels. DESeq2 uses a negative binomial distribution model to test for differences in read counts between the 2 defined groups and further controls for false discovery rate using the Benjamini and Hochberg procedure.

Several genera demonstrated significant abundance differences between the groups while adjusting for age at endoscopy and batch effects (sequencing libraries) (Figure 4 and see Table S1, Supplementary Digital Content 2, We identified genera that were differentially abundant in at least 2 of the grouping categories and found 14 genera that had dissimilar abundances between normal–atrophic gastritis group comparison, 14 genera between normal–H. pylori gastritis groups, 20 genera between atrophic gastritis–antral chemical gastritis groups, and 16 genera between H. pylori gastritis–antral chemical gastritis group comparison.

Figure 4.
Figure 4.:
Differentially enriched operational taxonomic units between normal–atrophic gastritis (a) and normal–H. pylori gastritis (b) at the genus and phylum levels. These operational taxonomic units were among the most significantly differentially abundant (alpha = 0.05, after multiple testing correction using the Benjamini–Hochberg method) between the groups shown in the title of the respective plot.

Unsurprisingly, the Helicobacter genus was a major component of the differences between all the groups. However, other genera contributed to the differences: normal–atrophic gastritis (Bradyrhizobium, Burkholderia, Caulobacter, Corynebacterium, Curvibacter, Gluconacetobacter, Lactococcus, Mobiluncus, Pelomonas, Peptoniphilus, Prevotella, and Propionibacterium) and antrum chemical gastritis–atrophic gastritis (Acinetobacter, Aeromonas, Asticcacaulis, Atopobium, Delftia, Ewingella, and Kocuria in addition to those identified in normal–atrophic gastritis comparison). The H. pylori gastritis–normal/antrum chemical gastritis group comparisons showed similar differentially enriched genera (Acinetobacter, Aeromonas, Bradyrhizobium, Burkholderia, Caulobacter, Helicobacter, Micrococcus, Pelomonas, Ralstonia, and Sphingobium) except for the following: H. pylori gastritis–antrum chemical gastritis (the genera Brevibacterium, Delftia, Halomonas, Kocuria, Lactococcus, and Variovorax were differentially enriched only within this comparison), whereas for the H. pylori gastritis–normal group comparison, Haemophilus, Porphyromonas, and Prevotella were differentially enriched in this comparison. The following groups were similar because there were no statistically significant differences between them: normal–antrum chemical gastritis, atrophic gastritis–H. pylori gastritis, and antrum chemical gastritis–post–H. pylori eradication and seropositive groups.

Microbial co-occurrence network analysis

To explore the interactions between microbes and environmental effects on their coexistence within biological communities (36), we performed a network analysis to detect co-occurrence patterns between taxa within the normal, H. pylori gastritis, and atrophic gastritis groups. The normal group network shown in Figure S14 (see Supplementary Digital Content 1, (with 330 nodes and 268 edges, 41 modules after filtering) had 4 communities with the highest connection (average degree = 11.17, average path length = 1.94) compared with the H. pylori gastritis and atrophic gastritis groups.

The H. pylori gastritis group network, shown in Figure S15 (see Supplementary Digital Content 1, (with 127 nodes and 44 edges, 24 modules after filtering), had 4 communities but with the lowest connection (average degree = 3.67, average path length = 2.83) compared with the other groups. The atrophic gastritis group network, shown in Figure S16 (see Supplementary Digital Content 1, (with 92 nodes and 148 edges, 56 modules after filtering), had 2 communities with medium connection (average degree = 5.29, average path length = 2.48) compared with the other groups. The strongest positive and negative associations between the OTUs at the genus level within the 3 groups were also identified (see Supplementary Results, Supplementary Digital Content 1,, Table S2, Supplementary Digital Content 3,, Tables S3a, S3b, and S4, Supplementary Digital Content 4–6,,,

H. pylori status and microbiota diversity

As expected from our low–H. pylori prevalence population, the proportion of H. pylori reads in all our sample groupings was very low (see Figure S7, Supplementary Digital Content 1, When samples were grouped as H. pylori positive or negative based on a positive result from either histology or serology, the H. pylori reads proportion remained low (Figure 5). We then assessed the variation of microbiota structure by H. pylori status by estimating microbial alpha diversity using the Shannon index. The H. pylori–negative group had a higher species evenness and richness compared with the H. pylori–positive group, as measured by the Shannon index (Figure 6a; observed [P = 0.39], Shannon [P = 0.001]; see Figure S9, Supplementary Digital Content 1, Similar results were obtained when using both histology and serology assays to define H. pylori status.

Figure 5.
Figure 5.:
Proportion of H. pylori reads by H. pylori status. H. pylori negative = 0.04% and H. pylori positive = 12.71%.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.:
(a) Alpha diversity box plots of H. pylori status using observed (P = 0.39) and Shannon index (P = 0.001). Differences between the ranked mean alpha diversity estimates in each of the 2 categories were tested using the Wilcoxon test. (b) Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) plots of Bray–Curtis distances showing a significant difference (P = 0.001, PERMANOVA test) between H. pylori–positive and H. pylori–negative samples. Red circles (positive) and turquoise circles (negative).

Assessment of structural similarities between the H. pylori–positive and H. pylori–negative groups was conducted based on the Bray–Curtis distance matrix and visualized using PCoA. Even though there was no distinct separation of samples by H. pylori status, H. pylori–positive samples tended to cluster together, although forming a subset of the larger H. pylori–negative cluster (Figure 6b), and a PERMANOVA test by H. pylori status showed a significant difference between the 2 groups (P = 0.001). A PCoA plot based on weighted UniFrac showed a similar pattern (see Figure S8, Supplementary Digital Content 1,


We appraised differences in stomach microbial composition across the healthy and disease states in the largest study to date of the human gastric microbiota, with 316 individuals drawn from a low–H. pylori prevalence Western general population. Analysis of the community structure using the Shannon index suggested that the normal stomach appeared to have the highest microbial diversity, followed by antral chemical gastritis, whereas the atrophic gastritis and H. pylori gastritis groups had the lowest alpha diversity. In assessing whether H. pylori status affects bacterial diversity in the stomach, we found that the H. pylori–negative group had a higher species evenness and richness compared with the H. pylori–positive group, as measured by the Shannon index (observed [P = 0.39], Shannon [P = 0.001]).

Our findings of the taxonomic composition of the normal stomach at the phylum level with Firmicutes (42%), Bacteroidetes (24%), Proteobacteria (17%), Actinobacteria (7%), and Fusobacteria (6%) being dominant confirm previous studies on human gastric microbiota under healthy/normal conditions (37–39). At the genus level, 140 genera were identified, and Streptococcus (23%), Prevotella (22%), Veillonella (6%), Fusobacterium (5%), Gemella (4%), Neisseria (4%), and Haemophilus (4%) constituted the 7 top genera (68%).

Analysis of the diversity between the groups showed a clear separation of normal/antrum chemical gastritis samples and H. pylori gastritis/atrophic gastritis samples, as demonstrated by the PERMANOVA test, and the differential analysis using DESeq2 showed that the genus Helicobacter was a major component of the differences between all the groups. However, non–H. pylori bacteria have previously been reported (10,40) to contribute to the differences. Our results support this and remained so after the removal of the OTUs belonging to the genus Helicobacter, indicating that the differences are not solely driven by H. pylori. In the differential analysis, we still observed other genera, such as Streptococcus, Bradyrhizobium, Propionibacterium, and Burkholderia contributing to the between-group differences even in the absence of H. pylori. These findings may, however, be affected by the prevalence of H. pylori in the population where the study sample was drawn. Although our finding of the normal group being different from the H. pylori gastritis/atrophic gastritis groups is in agreement with Parsons et al. (10) in their study of 95 individuals, the removal of H. pylori from the analysis showed that the differences between normal and H. pylori gastritis were no longer significant, contrary to ours. Furthermore, they did not report any statistically significant difference between the normal group and atrophic gastritis group when H. pylori was included in the analysis. The differences in conclusions could partly be explained by the dominance of H. pylori sequences in the H. pylori gastritis group in their study (approximately 97% compared with 14% in our study). It is also possible that biopsy sampling might capture more mucosa-adherent bacteria compared with a brush sampling method, but a study (41) comparing brush and biopsy sampling methods of the ileal pouch for assessment of mucosa-associated microbiota in human subjects found that both the techniques provide similar assessments of the microbial community composition, with the brush sampling method having 3 main advantages, relatively more bacterial to host DNA, coverage of a larger surface area, and being less traumatic to the epithelium than a mucosal biopsy.

In the study by Parsons et al., the H. pylori–induced atrophic gastritis group showed a more complex microbial co-occurrence network compared with the nonatrophic H. pylori gastritis group (10). Our results support those findings and further show that the normal group network, with the highest average degree, is the most highly connected, followed by the atrophic gastritis group network, whereas the H. pylori gastritis group network had the least connection compared with the other groups. Communities with a high average degree would be assumed to harbor a high degree of functional redundancy, and therefore, changes in community composition may not correspond with changes in functional rates (42). Overall, co-occurrence analysis suggests the presence of different interactive patterns between these groups. Oral bacteria, depending on the stomach conditions, either pass through the stomach or have the potential to colonize it. Comparing our representative sequences to the Human Oral Microbiome Database (35), there were more positive co-occurrences of oral bacterial communities in the stomach because samples shifted away from the normal group network, although the strongest bacterial coexcluding interactions tended to be mostly between oral and nonoral bacteria among all the networks. Some species within the genera of the identified oral bacteria, e.g., Peptostreptococcus, Prevotella, Centipeda, Actinomyces, and Atopobium, are pathogenic (14,43,44) and might possibly contribute to cancer-promoting activities within the stomach early on in the Correa cascade.

In assessing whether H. pylori status affects bacterial diversity in the stomach, we found that the H. pylori–negative group had a higher species evenness and richness compared with the H. pylori–positive group, as measured by the Shannon index. Similar results were obtained when using both histology and serology assays to define H. pylori status. Even though there was no distinct separation of samples by H. pylori status, H. pylori–positive samples tended to cluster together, although forming a subset of the larger H. pylori–negative cluster, and the PERMANOVA test showed a significant difference between the 2 groups. A PCoA plot based on weighted UniFrac showed a similar pattern. This agrees with the previous findings from a 2008 Swedish study of 6 patients (38); however, data from a 2014 Malaysian study with 215 patients (18) found no differences. Noteworthy, however, is that the 2014 study (18) analyzed only the culturable bacteria from the stomach.

How colonization with H. pylori affects the gastric microbiota is not fully understood, but its density increases with worsening gastritis (45), probably allowing H. pylori to outcompete other bacteria (37,40). As hypochlorhydria increases because of chronic H. pylori infection (46), it probably exacerbates the colonization of the gastric mucosa by microbiota that would otherwise not be able to colonize this environment, such as the oropharyngeal bacteria. Alternatively, as the gastric mucosal barrier becomes more compromised because of H. pylori infection and subsequent inflammation, the resident non–H. pylori bacteria may develop pathogenic properties adhering to and even penetrating into the mucosa (47). The relationship between H. pylori and non–H. pylori bacteria in the pathogenesis of atrophic gastritis and gastric cancer needs further elucidation.

Some of the non–H. pylori bacteria that we have identified in the stomach potentially play a role in promoting inflammation and gastric carcinogenesis. Nitrosating bacteria, such as Veillonella, Haemophilus, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, and Neisseria (48,49), can form N-nitroso compounds (NOC) that increase the risk of gastric cancer (48). The nitrosating capacity of NOC is acid–base equilibrium dependent and optimally functions at a low pH, and its proportion decreases with increasing pH in the stomach (50). Other stomach bacteria we identified, such as Actinomyces, Corynebacterium, Haemophilus, Streptococcus, and Staphylococcus, are known urease producers (51), a major inducer of innate immune response (52–54).

Some limitations of our study are that we used bacterial DNA as opposed to RNA; hence, we cannot distinguish whether the identified bacteria were metabolically active within the stomach. However, we observed an overlap of microbiota in our study compared with those identified in RNA-based studies (40,55), partly allaying this concern. It was not possible to identify which subjects with precancerous pathology would and would not progress to gastric cancer that may be microbiome dependent. Because we did not have access to information about the true history of H. pylori eradication in our cohort, we classified 20 participants with a histological diagnosis of post–H. pylori who were H. pylori positive on serology into the “post–H. pylori eradication/seropositive” group. This subgrouping might have led to some misclassification because it likely includes cases with overlooked H. pylori and a subgroup with past infection and thus presents another limitation of our study; studies based on posteradication therapy that succeeded will be better suited to study this subgroup.

The strengths of our study include the first evaluation of gastric microbiota in a random population-based sample, the large sample size (316 subjects), and the use of cytology brush samples. It is known that microbiota from tissue biopsy samples differ from gastric juice samples (56) irrespective of H. pylori infection. We hypothesize that the cytology brush approach, which collects cells by swabbing the gastric mucosa, provides a more representative view of the gastric mucosal microbiota through limiting the contamination of human DNA, a typical issue with tissue biopsy, although this hypothesis remains to be verified. Our use of a structured biopsy protocol and video-reviewed endoscopy process ensured standardized sample collection, and the objective phenotyping of subjects into disease groupings limits the scope for misclassification.

In conclusion, we show for the first time that the normal gastric mucosal microbiota based on brushings is very similar to the findings in antral chemical gastritis. Furthermore, the choice of a study reference group is important because we have demonstrated that the normal stomach is different from both nonatrophic H. pylori gastritis and atrophic gastritis that have been routinely used as reference groups in gastric microbiota studies. Previous work might therefore present a skewed picture of the baseline microbiota, and the choice of a comparison group will affect interstudy comparability. By comparing microbiota between the normal stomach to the early precancerous and other non-normal states in a low–H. pylori prevalence population, (57) we provide a clearer picture of the bacteria that potentially contribute to, or are part of, the dysbiosis associated with gastric carcinogenesis. An increased understanding of the role of non–H. pylori bacteria in the stomach mucosa may allow new approaches to prevention and treatment of disease in the future.


Guarantor of the article: Weimin Ye, MD, PhD.

Specific author contributions: N.N. conducted microbiome experiments and bioinformatics analysis, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript; A.P. supervised biostatistical analysis data and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; A.F.A. supervised bioinformatics analysis and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; U.Z. coordinated laboratory experiments, the project, and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; A.A. coordinated the main project and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; M.V. performed serohistopathologic evaluation and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; N.J.T. guided analysis and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; L.A. codesigned the study, coordinated and collected study samples, and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; W.Y. designed and supervised the study, analyzed data, critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content, and obtained funding. All authors approved the final submitted draft.

Financial support: This study was supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council (2015-02625) and Swedish Cancer Society (2016-510). N.N. was partly supported by KID funding, and W.Y. was partly supported by a European Research Council consolidator grant (ERC-2015-CoG, no.: 682663). Funders had no involvement in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Potential competing interests: None to report.

Study Highlights


  • ✓ Non–H. pylori microbiota contribute to dysbiosis.
  • H. pylori infection is a major cause of chronic gastritis cases that may eventually lead to gastric cancer through the Correa cascade in a subgroup.


  • ✓ The gastric mucosa–associated microbiota profile of the normal stomach is significantly different from that of patients with nonatrophic gastritis and atrophic gastritis. A true normal control group has rarely been included in past studies.
  • ✓ Description of the normal microbiota in the healthy gastric mucosa from a general low–H. pylori prevalence population.
  • ✓ The normal/healthy stomach microbiota are similar to the gastric microbiota in chemical gastritis.
  • ✓ There is an increasing abundance of pathogenic bacteria because the gastric mucosa deviates from the normal state to potential early precancerous states.


We are very grateful to the study participants. We also thank UPPMAX for the use of computer infrastructure resources and the support from the National Genomics Infrastructure (NGI) Stockholm at the Science for Life Laboratory in providing assistance in DNA sequencing.


1. Marshall BJ, Warren JR. Unidentified curved bacilli in the stomach of patients with gastritis and peptic ulceration. Lancet 1984;1:1311–5.
2. Hooi JKY, Lai WY, Ng WK, et al. Global prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 2017;153:420–9.
3. Correa P, Piazuelo MB. The gastric precancerous cascade. J Dig Dis 2012;13:2–9.
4. Salaspuro M. Acetaldehyde as a common denominator and cumulative carcinogen in digestive tract cancers. Scand J Gastroenterol 2009;44:912–25.
5. Sipponen P. Chronic gastritis and ulcer risk. Scand J Gastroenterol 1990;25:193–6.
6. Sipponen P, Maaroos HI. Chronic gastritis. Scand J Gastroenterol 2015;50:657–67.
7. Song H, Held M, Sandin S, et al. Increase in the prevalence of atrophic gastritis among adults age 35 to 44 years old in Northern Sweden between 1990 and 2009. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015;13:1592–600.e1.
8. Song H, Ekheden IG, Zheng Z, et al. Incidence of gastric cancer among patients with gastric precancerous lesions: Observational cohort study in a low risk Western population. BMJ 2015;351:h3867.
9. Dicksved J, Lindberg M, Rosenquist M, et al. Molecular characterization of the stomach microbiota in patients with gastric cancer and in controls. J Med Microbiol 2009;58:509–16.
10. Parsons BN, Ijaz UZ, D'Amore R, et al. Comparison of the human gastric microbiota in hypochlorhydric states arising as a result of Helicobacter pylori-induced atrophic gastritis, autoimmune atrophic gastritis and proton pump inhibitor use. PLoS Pathog 2017;13:e1006653.
11. Lofgren JL, Whary MT, Ge Z, et al. Lack of commensal flora in Helicobacter pylori-infected INS-GAS mice reduces gastritis and delays intraepithelial neoplasia. Gastroenterology 2011;140:210–20.
12. Zhou F, Shi J, Fang C, et al. Gastric carcinomas in young (younger than 40 years) Chinese patients: Clinicopathology, family history, and postresection survival. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95:e2873.
13. Anderson WF, Camargo MC, Fraumeni JF Jr, et al. Age-specific trends in incidence of noncardia gastric cancer in US adults. JAMA 2010;303:1723–8.
14. Coker OO, Dai Z, Nie Y, et al. Mucosal microbiome dysbiosis in gastric carcinogenesis. Gut 2018;67:1024–32.
15. Ferreira RM, Pereira-Marques J, Pinto-Ribeiro I, et al. Gastric microbial community profiling reveals a dysbiotic cancer-associated microbiota. Gut 2018;67:226–36.
16. Yang I, Woltemate S, Piazuelo MB, et al. Different gastric microbiota compositions in two human populations with high and low gastric cancer risk in Colombia. Sci Rep 2016;6:18594.
17. Eun CS, Kim BK, Han DS, et al. Differences in gastric mucosal microbiota profiling in patients with chronic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, and gastric cancer using pyrosequencing methods. Helicobacter 2014;19:407–16.
18. Khosravi Y, Dieye Y, Poh BH, et al. Culturable bacterial microbiota of the stomach of Helicobacter pylori positive and negative gastric disease patients. ScientificWorldJournal 2014;2014:610421.
19. Gao JJ, Zhang Y, Gerhard M, et al. Association between gut microbiota and Helicobacter pylori-related gastric lesions in a high-risk population of gastric cancer. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2018;8:202.
20. Agreus L, Svardsudd K, Talley NJ, et al. Natural history of gastroesophageal reflux disease and functional abdominal disorders: A population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:2905–14.
21. Agreus L, Svardsudd K, Nyren O, et al. Irritable bowel syndrome and dyspepsia in the general population: Overlap and lack of stability over time. Gastroenterology 1995;109:671–80.
22. Agreus L, Hellstrom PM, Talley NJ, et al. Towards a healthy stomach? Helicobacter pylori prevalence has dramatically decreased over 23 years in adults in a Swedish community. United Eur Gastroenterol J 2016;4:686–96.
23. Wallner B, Sylvan A, Janunger KG. Endoscopic assessment of the “Z-line” (squamocolumnar junction) appearance: Reproducibility of the ZAP classification among endoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;55:65–9.
24. Herlemann DP, Labrenz M, Jurgens K, et al. Transitions in bacterial communities along the 2000 km salinity gradient of the Baltic Sea. ISME J 2011;5:1571–9.
25. Edgar RC. UPARSE: Highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat Methods 2013;10:996–8.
26. Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, et al. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007;73:5261–7.
27. McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. phyloseq: An R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One 2013;8:e61217.
28. Oksanen J, Blanchet F, Kindt R, et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R Package Version (2.3-5). Vienna, Austria: R Foundation; 2016.
29. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 2014;15:550.
30. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation; 2016.
31. Friedman J, Alm EJ. Inferring correlation networks from genomic survey data. PLoS Comput Biol 2012;8:e1002687.
32. Bastian M, Heymann S, Jacomy M. Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. Presented in the International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media; 2009.
33. Langille MG, Zaneveld J, Caporaso JG, et al. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nat Biotechnol 2013;31:814–21.
34. Parks DH, Tyson GW, Hugenholtz P, et al. STAMP: Statistical analysis of taxonomic and functional profiles. Bioinformatics 2014;30:3123–4.
35. Chen T, Yu WH, Izard J, et al. The human oral microbiome database: A web accessible resource for investigating oral microbe taxonomic and genomic information. Database (Oxford) 2010;2010:baq013.
36. Faust K, Raes J. Microbial interactions: From networks to models. Nat Rev Microbiol 2012;10:538–50.
37. Bik EM, Eckburg PB, Gill SR, et al. Molecular analysis of the bacterial microbiota in the human stomach. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:732–7.
38. Andersson AF, Lindberg M, Jakobsson H, et al. Comparative analysis of human gut microbiota by barcoded pyrosequencing. PLoS One 2008;3:e2836.
39. Li XX, Wong GL, To KF, et al. Bacterial microbiota profiling in gastritis without Helicobacter pylori infection or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use. PLoS One 2009;4:e7985.
40. Schulz C, Schutte K, Koch N, et al. The active bacterial assemblages of the upper GI tract in individuals with and without Helicobacter infection. Gut 2018;67:216–25.
41. Huse SM, Young VB, Morrison HG, et al. Comparison of brush and biopsy sampling methods of the ileal pouch for assessment of mucosa-associated microbiota of human subjects. Microbiome 2014;2:5.
42. Allison SD, Martiny JB. Colloquium paper: Resistance, resilience, and redundancy in microbial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105(Suppl 1):11512–9.
43. Patil S, Rao RS, Sanketh DS, et al. Microbial flora in oral diseases. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14:1202–8.
44. Rams TE, Hawley CE, Whitaker EJ, et al. Centipeda periodontii in human periodontitis. Odontology 2015;103:286–91.
45. Monstein HJ, Tiveljung A, Kraft CH, et al. Profiling of bacterial flora in gastric biopsies from patients with Helicobacter pylori-associated gastritis and histologically normal control individuals by temperature gradient gel electrophoresis and 16S rDNA sequence analysis. J Med Microbiol 2000;49:817–22.
46. El-Omar EM, Rabkin CS, Gammon MD, et al. Increased risk of noncardia gastric cancer associated with proinflammatory cytokine gene polymorphisms. Gastroenterology 2003;124:1193–201.
47. Sanduleanu S, Jonkers D, De Bruine A, et al. Non-Helicobacter pylori bacterial flora during acid-suppressive therapy: Differential findings in gastric juice and gastric mucosa. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2001;15:379–88.
48. Jo HJ, Kim J, Kim N, et al. Analysis of gastric microbiota by pyrosequencing: Minor role of bacteria other than Helicobacter pylori in the gastric carcinogenesis. Helicobacter 2016;21:364–74.
49. Ayanaba A, Alexander M. Microbial formation of nitrosamines in vitro. Appl Microbiol 1973;25:862–8.
50. Stockbrügger RW, Armbrecht U. Bacterial overgrowth in the upper gastrointestinal-tract and possible consequences: Report of a workshop in Brussels, Belgium, 9–10 February, 1990. Microb Ecol Health Dis 1991;4:i–vii.
51. Brandi G, Biavati B, Calabrese C, et al. Urease-positive bacteria other than Helicobacter pylori in human gastric juice and mucosa. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:1756–61.
52. Gobert AP, Mersey BD, Cheng Y, et al. Cutting edge: Urease release by Helicobacter pylori stimulates macrophage inducible nitric oxide synthase. J Immunol 2002;168:6002–6.
53. Suerbaum S, Michetti P. Helicobacter pylori infection. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1175–86.
54. MacMicking J, Xie QW, Nathan C. Nitric oxide and macrophage function. Annu Rev Immunol 1997;15:323–50.
55. Thorell K, Bengtsson-Palme J, Liu OH, et al. In vivo analysis of the viable microbiota and Helicobacter pylori transcriptome in gastric infection and early stages of carcinogenesis. Infect Immun 2017;85:e00031–17.
56. Sung J, Kim N, Kim J, et al. Comparison of gastric microbiota between gastric juice and mucosa by next generation sequencing method. J Cancer Prev 2016;21:60–5.
57. Thjodleifsson B, Asbjornsdottir H, Sigurjonsdottir RB, et al. Seroprevalence of Helicobacter pylori and cagA antibodies in Iceland, Estonia and Sweden. Scand J Infect Dis 2007;39:683–9.

Supplemental Digital Content

© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Gastroenterology