Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

EDITORIAL

Hepatic Encephalopathy: A Diagnosis for the Individual but an Experience for the Household

Louissaint, Jeremy MD1; Tapper, Elliot B. MD1,2

Author Information
Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology: May 2020 - Volume 11 - Issue 5 - p e00181
doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000181
  • Open

Abstract

THE WEIGHT OF HEPATIC ENCEPHALOPATHY: HEAVY AND SHARED

Although it presents with a spectrum of severity, even the presence of minimal hepatic encephalopathy (HE) impacts every aspect of a patient's life. HE disrupts one's sleep, driving, daily functioning, and earning potential and carries with it the burden of repeated hospitalizations and diminished survival (1–4). Unsurprisingly, these effects on the patient spill over and affect the quality of life (QoL), health, and functioning of one's caregivers (5). Measuring patient- and caregiver-reported outcomes in cirrhosis provides essential insights into the subjective impact of the disease (6). However, our understanding of contributors to the psychological burden of HE remains incomplete. Missing from the literature are the voices of those experiencing the debilitating consequences of HE. Fabrellas et al. extends our knowledge of the scale and scope of the burden of HE on patients and their caregivers with an important study that gives voice directly to those who are affected (7).

STUDY FINDINGS

Using a mixed-methods study design, the authors enrolled 15 patients with a history of HE and their informal caregivers to complete validated QoL scales (Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 and, additionally for caregivers, the Zarit Burden Index). In all areas of the physical and mental components of the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36, both patients and their caregivers reported markedly lower health-related QoL scores compared with established norms. Caregiver burden was also exceedingly high (mean Zarit Burden Index 51). Semistructured interviews revealed high expressions of fear, anxiety, sorrow, and anger in nearly half of patients and in one-third of their caregivers. Even more alarming was the disclosure from most participants that the entity of HE was unknown to them before its actual occurrence. In summary, this informative data provide us with 3 major opportunities to improve the care we deliver to patients and their caregivers (Table 1).

Table 1.
Table 1.:
Reducing the psychological burden of hepatic encephalopathy

IDENTIFYING AT-RISK PERSONS

Improving the burden of HE begins with proper identification of those at risk so that we can prepare patients and mitigate known precipitants. This starts with risk stratification, which includes the use of scores such as the Bilirubin–Albumin–Beta-Blocker–Statin score and screening for covert HE with tools such as the Animal Naming Test or EncephalApp Stroop (8,9). In addition, routine care for persons with cirrhosis should include frequent review of medications and efforts to minimize risky medications, such as benzodiazepines, opiates, and proton pump inhibitors (10,11). Finally, nutritional interventions to achieve protein targets (e.g., 1 g/kg actual bodyweight) are recommended to reduce the risk of sarcopenia and forestall HE episodes (12).

REDUCING RISK

Secondary prophylaxis of HE relies on both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic strategies. Lactulose, rifaximin, and optimized nutrition all reduce the risk of recurrent HE and improve patient-reported outcomes (13,14). However, as highlighted by Fabrellas et al., treatment must also address the psychological burden experienced by patients and their caregivers. Clinicians should inquire about, validate, and address the worries and fears experienced by their patients. When indicated, clinicians should then refer patients and their caregivers for counseling and consider interventions, such as mindfulness training, that improve mood, sleep, and caregiver burden (15). Additional, scalable interventions are also needed. We, for example, have launched a randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of resilience training and emotional disclosure through keeping a diary on caregiver burden (16).

EDUCATION

Fabrellas et al. also found that patients and caregivers felt totally unprepared during the first occurrence of HE because of minimal or no awareness of HE being a complication that they were at risk of experiencing. Although striking, this is consistent with other studies. When assessed, patient’s knowledge regarding the natural progression of cirrhosis is consistently low; however, improvement can be achieved through structured patient education (17,18). Similarly, there is a need for education of frontline providers to improve the recognition of covert encephalopathy in order to promote both timely referral and treatment.

CONCLUSION

The time is now to recognize the deleterious effects of HE on patient- and caregiver-reported health-related QoL. After identification, we must implement treatment strategies that not only address the disease but also reduce the burden placed on the household.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Guarantor of the article: Elliot B. Tapper, MD.

Specific author contributions: J.L.: concept, analysis, and writing. E.B.T.: concept, analysis, and revision.

Financial support: Jeremy Louissaint T32DK062708. Elliot B. Tapper receives funding from the National Institutes of Health through the NIDDK (1K23DK117055-01A1).

Potential competing interests: E.B.T. has served as a consultant to Norvartis, Kaleido, and Allergan; has served on advisory boards for Mallinckrodt, Rebiotix, and Bausch Health; and has received unrestricted research grants from Gilead.

REFERENCES

1. Shaw J, Bajaj J. Covert hepatic encephalopathy: Can my patient drive? J Clin Gastroenterol 2017;51(2):118–26.
2. Formentin C, Garrido M, Montagnese S. Assessment and management of sleep disturbance in cirrhosis. Curr Hepatol Rep 2018;17(1):52–69.
3. Bajaj JS, Riggio O, Allampati S, et al. Cognitive dysfunction is associated with poor socioeconomic status in patients with cirrhosis: An international multicenter study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013;11(11):1511–6.
4. Patidar KR, Thacker LR, Wade JB, et al. Covert hepatic encephalopathy is independently associated with poor survival and increased risk of hospitalization. Am J Gastroenterol 2014;109(11):1757–63.
5. Bajaj JS, Wade JB, Gibson DP, et al. The multi-dimensional burden of cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy on patients and caregivers. Am J Gastroenterol 2011;106(9):1646–53.
6. Orr JG, Homer T, Ternent L, et al. Health related quality of life in people with advanced chronic liver disease. J Hepatol 2014;61(5):1158–65.
7. Fabrellas N, Moreira R, Carol M, et al. Psychological burden of hepatic encephalopathy on patients and caregivers. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2020;11(4):e00159.
8. Tapper EB, Parikh ND, Sengupta N, et al. A risk score to predict the development of hepatic encephalopathy in a population-based cohort of patients with cirrhosis. Hepatology 2018;68(4):1498–507.
9. Tapper EB, Parikh ND, Waljee AK, et al. Diagnosis of minimal hepatic encephalopathy: A systematic review of point-of-care diagnostic tests. Am J Gastroenterol 2018;113(4):529–38.
10. Tapper EB, Baki J, Parikh ND, et al. Frailty, psychoactive medications, and cognitive dysfunction are associated with poor patient-reported outcomes in cirrhosis. Hepatology 2019;69(4):1676–85.
11. Tapper EB, Henderson JB, Parikh ND, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for hepatic encephalopathy in a population-based cohort of Americans with cirrhosis. Hepatol Commun 2019;3(11):1510–9.
12. European Association for the Study of the Liver. Electronic address: easloffice@easloffice.eu; European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on nutrition in chronic liver disease. J Hepatol 2019;70(1):172–93.
13. Acharya C, Bajaj JS. Current management of hepatic encephalopathy. Am J Gastroenterol 2018;113(11):1600–12.
14. Sanyal A, Younossi ZM, Bass NM, et al. Randomised clinical trial: Rifaximin improves health-related quality of life in cirrhotic patients with hepatic encephalopathy: A double-blind placebo-controlled study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011;34(8):853–61.
15. Bajaj JS, Ellwood M, Ainger T, et al. Mindfulness-based stress reduction therapy improves patient and caregiver-reported outcomes in cirrhosis. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2017;8(7):e108.
16. CAREGIVER: A Trial to Improve the Burden and Distress of Caring for Persons With Decompensated Cirrhosis—Full Text View—ClinicalTrials.gov. (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04205396). Accessed March 13, 2020.
17. Goldsworthy MA, Fateen W, Thygesen H, et al. Patient understanding of liver cirrhosis and improvement using multimedia education. Frontline Gastroenterol 2017;8(3):214–9.
18. Volk ML, Fisher N, Fontana RJ. Patient knowledge about disease self-management in cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol 2013;108(3):302–5.
© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Gastroenterology