Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Serum Soluble Receptor for AGE (sRAGE) Levels Are Associated With Unhealthy Lifestyle and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Ivancovsky-Wajcman, Dana, RD1; Zelber-Sagi, Shira, RD, PhD1,2; Fliss Isakov, Naomi, RD, PhD2; Webb, Muriel, MD2,3; Zemel, Meir, MD4; Shibolet, Oren, MD2,3; Kariv, Revital, MD2,3

Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology: May 22, 2019 - Volume 10 - Issue 5 - p 1–10
doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000040

OBJECTIVES: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has been demonstrated to be positively associated with serum advanced glycation end products (AGEs) and negatively with soluble receptor for AGE (sRAGE) in a few small studies. We aimed to test the association between lifestyle and sRAGE levels and the association between sRAGE levels or AGEs intake and NAFLD, insulin resistance (IR), and elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT).

METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis among participants of a screening study. Fasting blood tests and serum sRAGE levels were obtained. NAFLD and insulin resistance were evaluated by ultrasonography and homeostasis model assessment, respectively. Nutritional intake was measured by food frequency questionnaire, and the intake of dietary AGEs was calculated.

RESULTS: A total of 743 subjects were included (52.6% men, mean age 58.83 ± 6.58 years, 38.7% NAFLD). Exercise was independently protective from low sRAGE levels (odds ratio [OR] = 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.52–0.97, P = 0.031). Pack-years, working time, and sedentary time (OR = 1.51, 1.03–2.22, P = 0.036; OR = 1.66, 1.18–2.35, P = 0.004; OR = 1.64, 1.18–2.29, P = 0.004, respectively), and intake of red and/or processed meat or processed meat alone (OR = 1.01, 1.04–2.21, P = 0.045; OR = 1.49, 1.00–2.21, P = 0.048, respectively) were associated with increased odds for low sRAGE levels. Low sRAGE levels were independently associated with elevated ALT (OR = 1.69, 1.11–2.57, P = 0.014) and NAFLD with elevated ALT (OR = 2.17, 1.23–3.83, P = 0.007). High intake of dietary AGEs was associated with IR (OR = 2.04, 1.25–3.34 P = 0.004).

DISCUSSION: Lifestyle is associated with sRAGE levels and, in turn, low levels of sRAGE are associated with NAFLD and elevated ALT.

1School of Public Health, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel;

2Department of Gastroenterology, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel;

3The Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel;

4Department of Surgery, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

Correspondence: Shira Zelber-Sagi, RD, PhD. E-mail:

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL accompanies this paper at

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received December 08, 2018

Accepted March 12, 2019

Online date: May 10, 2019

Back to Top | Article Outline


Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), the hepatic manifestation of insulin resistance (IR), is one of the most important causes of liver disease worldwide (1) and is the most common cause of abnormal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (2). Unhealthy Western lifestyle, which is characterized by smoking (3,4), poor diet, long sedentary and working time, and low performance of exercise (triple hit behavioral phenotype), has a well-established association with NAFLD and liver damage (5,6). Specifically, dietary patterns that are rich in red and/or processed meat (7) and sugar-sweetened beverages (8) are significant in NAFLD etiology (9–11). The mechanisms by which diet and other lifestyle factors lead to NAFLD or its progression are not completely understood. In recent years, the role of advanced glycation end products (AGEs)/receptor for AGEs (RAGE) axis has been studied in relation to NAFLD. AGEs are the end products of the Maillard reaction, a nonenzymatic reaction between reducing sugars and the free amino groups of proteins (12–14). Although AGEs are normally formed endogenously, exogenous sources appear to also increase serum AGEs levels, including tobacco use and intake of high heat-cooked food like processed food, especially meat (12,13,15). An interaction between AGEs and its cell-surface receptor RAGE stimulates activation of nuclear factor kB, thrombogenesis, vascular inflammation, pathological angiogenesis (12,13), and oxidative stress (16). There are several isoforms of soluble RAGE (sRAGE), the main 2 are sRAGE and endogenous secretory RAGE (esRAGE). The first is derived from cell surface cleavage mechanisms and the second is derived from pre-mRNA alternative splicing (17).

In contrast to RAGE, sRAGE lacks the intracellular domain (18), prevents the binding of extracellular AGEs to the cell-surface RAGE, and inhibits the AGE/RAGE signaling (17). Thus, sRAGE exerts protective effects in pathologic, metabolic, and inflammatory conditions (17). Indeed, few studies demonstrated a protective association between high sRAGE levels and liver damage including NAFLD (19–21), nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) (20), and liver cancer (22). In addition, low serum sRAGE levels were found to be positively associated with elevated ALT and IR (23). Although the protective role of sRAGE is increasingly explored, there is uncertainty about the factors related with serum sRAGE levels. An inverse association between sRAGE levels and anthropometric measures, weight (24), body mass index (BMI) (24–26), and waist circumference (24), has been demonstrated. However, the possible effect of lifestyle on sRAGE levels is less studied. Exercise was positively correlated with elevated sRAGE levels in both observational (27) and clinical (18,19) studies. In addition, smoking and pack-years were demonstrated to be associated with lower sRAGE levels in a cross-sectional study (28). However, there is lack of data on the association between nutrition in general and meat consumption in particular, and serum sRAGE levels. The current study aimed to test the association between lifestyle habits and sRAGE levels and, in turn, the association between sRAGE or AGEs levels and NAFLD, IR, and elevated ALT. We hypnotize that unhealthy lifestyle habits will be negatively associated with sRAGE levels, and, in turn, low sRAGE levels will be positively associated with NAFLD, IR, and elevated ALT.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Study design and population

This was a cross-sectional study among consecutive 40- to 70-year-old subjects who underwent screening colonoscopy at the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology in the Tel-Aviv Medical Center and agreed to participate in a metabolic and hepatic screening study between the years 2010 and 2015 (convenience sample) (previously described in detail (7)). Exclusion criteria included presence of Hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) or anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibodies, fatty liver suspected to be secondary to hepatotoxic drugs, inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease, and excessive alcohol consumption (≥30 g/d in men or ≥20 g/d in women) (29,30). In addition, subjects who reported an unreasonable caloric intake were excluded: outside the acceptable range for men 800–4,000 kcal/d and for women 500–3,500 kcal/d (31).

The study was approved by the Tel-Aviv Medical Center Institutional Review Board, and all patients signed an informed consent. A graphical explanation of the study hypothesis is available as an Addendum (see Supplementary Digital Content 1,

Back to Top | Article Outline

Data collection

Study participants were invited for a single day visit, in which they underwent fasting blood tests, liver ultrasound, interview using a structured questionnaire, assembled by the Israeli Ministry of Health (32), including demographic details and lifestyle. In addition, they completed food frequency questionnaire (FFQ).

Fatty liver was diagnosed by abdominal ultrasonography (AUS) using standardized criteria and performed in all subjects with the same equipment (EUB-8500 scanner Hitachi Medical Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) and by the same experienced radiologist (Webb M) as previously described (8). The ratio between the brightness level of the liver and the right kidney cortex was calculated to determine the hepatorenal index, which has been previously validated against liver biopsy (33).

IR was evaluated by high homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) score, defined by the 75th percentile (upper quartile, Q4) of the study sample HOMA levels, as accepted (34) (corresponding to a value > 3.31 for the entire sample and >4.68 for subjects with NAFLD).

Type 2 diabetes was defined as fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dL and/or HbA1C ≥ 6.5% and/or use of diabetic medications (35). Since in diabetes serum insulin concentrations may start to decline (36), the patients with diabetes who had no IR according to the upper quartile of HOMA levels (n = 44) were considered as having IR. Abdominal obesity was defined as waist circumference ≥102 for men and ≥88 for women (37).

Elevated ALT was defined according to the American College of Gastroenterology clinical guidelines: ALT> 33 IU/L for men and ALT> 25 IU/L for women (38). Serum sRAGE levels (all isoforms) were measured by human RAGE Quantikine ELISA kit (R&D Systems, MN) in frozen sera kept at −80 °C. Low sRAGE was defined as sRAGE levels below the cutoff of the population's first tertile (<1,013 pg/mL).

Back to Top | Article Outline

Nutritional variable evaluation and definitions

The semiquantitative FFQ, which was assembled by the Food and Nutrition Administration, Ministry of Health and tailored to the Israeli population, is composed of 117 food items with specified serving sizes. The nutrient components of each food item were taken from the Israeli National Nutrient Database, Food and Nutrition Administration, Ministry of Health. Meat types were categorized as accepted to “red”, “white” (chicken), and processed meat (39,40) as was previously described in detail (7). Processed meat was defined as meat that has been transformed through salting, smoking, or other processes to enhance flavor or improve preservation (40). In addition, estimation of dietary AGEs consumption was calculated based on food items from the FFQ using specific database (16) that has been used in several other studies (41,42). In general, the calculation relates to the following food groups: red meat, poultry, fish, bread and cereals, dairy products, and oils. For each food item, we calculated the amount of AGEs (AGEs content per 100 gr food item obtained from the database multiplied by the food item weight) and then summed total AGEs from all foods.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Lifestyle variable evaluation and definitions

The exercise questionnaire included a detailed list of aerobic activities and resistance training.

Pack-years was defined as cigarettes per day divided to 20 cigarettes per pack, multiplied by years of smoking. In addition, the lifestyle questionnaire included questions about the number of hours spent sedentary, screen time (computer or television) or reading. Physical effort during work was defined as “easy” (sedentary work or mostly standing) or “strenuous” (walking or having physical effort during work). Unemployed subjects were excluded (n = 237) from this analysis. Data about potential confounders such as anthropometrics, gender, age and caloric intake were collected.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 23 (IBM-SPSS Armonk, NY) software. Continuous variables are presented as means ± SD. To test differences in continuous variables between 2 or 3 groups, the independent sample t test and ANOVA were performed, respectively. Associations between nominal variables were performed with the Pearson χ2 test. In both χ2 test and ANOVA, P for trend was calculated. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to test the adjusted association between sRAGE and nutritional intake and NAFLD or high ALT adjusting for potential confounders (relevant variables that were different between low and high sRAGE levels as presented in Table 1). Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval are presented. P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant for all analyses.

Table 1

Table 1

Back to Top | Article Outline


Description of the study population and comparison between subjects with high and low (by first tertile) sRAGE levels is provided in Table 1.

Out of 970 subjects who participated in the study, 789 subjects were eligible, had all data, and were included in the analysis, as previously described (7). Of those, 743 subjects had serum sRAGE levels analysis (flow chart of the study population appears in Figure 1).

Figure 1

Figure 1

In the final sample of 789 subjects, 52.6% were men, mean age was 58.83 ± 6.58 years, and mean BMI was 28.54 ± 5.43 kg/m2. NAFLD was diagnosed in 38.7% (n = 305) of participants and elevated ALT was observed in 24.9% (n = 196) (2 subjects with missing data), whereas 14.2% (n = 112) had both NAFLD and elevated ALT. IR was diagnosed in 30.4% (n = 240) of participants (3 subjects with missing data) and type 2 diabetes among 14.8% (n = 117). The subsample of 743 subjects had similar characteristics in all parameters (52.6% men, mean age 58.81 ± 6.59 years).

Subjects with low sRAGE levels had higher prevalence of men, higher mean BMI, and higher prevalence of abdominal obesity, and these variables were considered as potential confounders. In addition, the prevalence of NAFLD was higher among subjects with low sRAGE levels, supported by higher hepatorenal index, as well as a greater prevalence of elevated ALT. Subjects with low sRAGE had longer smoking pack-years, sedentary time, and working hours.

Multivariate analysis of the association between lifestyle parameters and low sRAGE levels is provided in Table 2.

Table 2

Table 2

High level of exercise was independently protective from low sRAGE levels (OR = 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.52–0.97, P = 0.031) adjusting for age, gender, caloric intake, and abdominal obesity (Table 2, model A), but not with further adjustment for other lifestyle habits. In contrast, longer pack-years, working time, and sedentary hours (above median) were associated with increased odds for low sRAGE, adjusting for potential confounders and lifestyle habits (OR = 1.51, 1.03–2.22, P = 0.036; OR = 1.66, 1.18–2.35, P = 0.004; OR = 1.64, 1.18–2.29, P = 0.004, respectively) (Table 2, fully adjusted model B).

Univariate and multivariate analyses of the association between meat consumption and low sRAGE levels are shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2

Figure 2

The prevalence of low sRAGE levels was significantly higher across the increased consumption of total, red, and/or processed meat, in a dose-response manner (Figure 2, a-1, b-2, and c-1). In a multivariate analysis, the upper tertiles of red and/or processed meat or processed meat intake alone were associated with increased odds for low sRAGE levels (OR = 1.01, 1.04–2.21, P = 0.045; OR = 1.49, 1.00–2.21, P = 0.048, respectively), adjusting for age, gender, caloric intake, and abdominal obesity (Figure 2, b-2 and c-2, model A), but further adjustment for other lifestyle habits that were associated with meat consumption (pack-years and working time) attenuated the significance of associations. There was no association with total meat consumption.

Univariate and multivariate analyses of the association between dietary AGEs, sRAGE levels, and NAFLD are shown in Table 3 and Figure 3.

Table 3

Table 3

Figure 3

Figure 3

The prevalence of NAFLD, elevated ALT, and NAFLD with elevated ALT was lower as sRAGE levels were higher in a dose-response association (Figure 3a–c). In a multivariate analysis, the low serum sRAGE levels (<1,013 pg/mL) were associated with increased odds for NAFLD (OR = 1.51, 1.01–2.26, P = 0.044) adjusted for age, gender, caloric intake, and abdominal obesity. In the full model, with further adjustment for all lifestyle habits, which were associated with sRAGE (Table 2), low sRAGE levels were associated with elevated ALT (OR = 1.69, 1.11–2.57, P = 0.014), and significant dose-response association was demonstrated between serum sRAGE levels and NAFLD with elevated ALT (Table 3, model B).

Exclusion of diabetic subjects did not change any of the above-mentioned associations (data not shown).

Dietary AGEs were not associated with elevated ALT and/or NAFLD. However, the upper tertile of dietary AGEs (>11,964 kU/d) was associated with increased odds for IR in the entire population (OR = 2.04, 1.25–3.34, P = 0.004), and among NAFLD subjects (dietary AGEs > 12,552 kU/d) (OR = 2.50, 1.24–4.91, P = 0.010), adjusted for age, gender, caloric intake, abdominal obesity, and lifestyle habits as detailed in Table 2 (Figure 4a,b).

Figure 4

Figure 4

Back to Top | Article Outline


There is a wide agreement that unhealthy lifestyle plays a major role in the development and progression of NAFLD (6,11). However, there is still a need for further refinement of the complex interplay between lifestyle risk factors and NAFLD. This study thoroughly analyzed the association between a wide spectrum of diet and other NAFLD-related lifestyle factors, including AGEs intake, and sRAGE as a link to increased risk for NAFLD. Generally, we have shown that unhealthy lifestyle is associated with lower sRAGE levels which in turn is strongly and independently related with NAFLD and elevated ALT in a dose-response manner. Although exercise was positively associated with serum sRAGE levels, smoking burden, sedentary and working time, as well as red and/or processed meat consumption were negatively associated with sRAGE levels, adjusting for other lifestyle habits.

Our results are in accordance with the few studies published on this topic, showing that exercise (18,27) or lifestyle intervention (19) may be effective in increasing serum sRAGE levels (18,27). Similarly, our finding that smoking burden is associated with low sRAGE levels supports previous findings, showing a negative association between pack-years and sRAGE levels among normal weight patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (43) or in the general population (28). In contrast to our finding that longer sedentary and working time are associated with low serum sRAGE levels, in Momma et al. study (44), there was no difference in desk work time between esRAGE tertiles. Our study demonstrated a novel association between red and especially processed meat consumption, and low sRAGE levels in a dose-response manner, which was maintained following adjustment for all other lifestyle risk factors. This association is interesting since the association between meat consumption, especially red and processed meat, and NAFLD was demonstrated in several studies (7,8,45).

The mechanisms linking between lifestyle and sRAGE levels are unknown. Tobacco use, high meat consumption, and processed food consumption alter AGEs body pool and may indirectly affect sRAGE levels (12). Specifically, the association between sRAGE and meat may stem from the fact that processed meat contains, in addition to metabolically unhealthy compounds as sodium (46) and other preservatives (47), a significant amount of AGEs (47,48). Dietary AGEs were associated in our study with increased IR in both the entire population and among NAFLD-diagnosed subjects. This association is supported by clinical trials and meta-analyses indicating beneficial effect of dietary AGEs restriction in the reduction of HOMA-IR (12,42,49) and cardiometabolic risk factors (42). Indeed, an inverse association has been demonstrated between sRAGE levels and IR and the metabolic syndrome components (20,25,50,51). In addition, these unhealthy lifestyle habits may cause inflammation and oxidative stress (52). An inverse correlation has been demonstrated between oxidative stress biomarkers and sRAGE levels (53), suggesting the hypothesis that oxidative stress may mediate the association between unhealthy lifestyle and low sRAGE levels.

Next, our study demonstrated that low serum sRAGE levels are associated with increased odds for NAFLD, elevated ALT, and NAFLD with elevated ALT. Our findings are in agreement with previous cross-sectional and case-control studies showing that low sRAGE levels increase the odds for NAFLD, adjusting for obesity measures (19,23). Elevated ALT was added to the outcomes in our study since it signals liver inflammation and injury and a higher likelihood for NASH (38), all potentially relevant to the proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory effect of AGEs and sRAGE, respectively (17). Interestingly, low sRAGE had a stronger association with elevated ALT by itself or combined with NAFLD compared to NAFLD alone. Similarly, low sRAGE has been demonstrated by previous studies to be associated with elevated ALT (19,20,23) and indeed also with proven NASH (20). These findings are also supported by similar association of high serum AGEs/sRAGE ratio with NAFLD and elevated ALT (23). Altogether, our finding and results from previous studies support the notion that sRAGE may serve as a useful marker and therapeutic target for NAFLD.

The study has several limitations to consider. First, the cross-sectional design of the study does not allow causal inference, and our findings need to be confirmed in prospective studies. Second, lifestyle habits and meat consumption were self-reported and thus prone to a report bias. However, since the participants and the research team were both blinded to the AUS and blood tests results, it is a nondifferential repot bias and therefore it may have only weakened the observed associations. In addition, the external validity of the associations with diet needs to be confirmed among diverse populations with different dietary and lifestyle characteristics. Moreover, the calculated AGEs intake is based on Americans food items that may be different from the Israeli food items. Third, the diagnosis of NAFLD was established by AUS, which is not the gold standard. However, it is the most accepted and common screening method for NAFLD in a general population (29).

In conclusion, exercise is positively associated whereas meat consumption, smoking duration, working time, and sedentary time are negatively associated with serum sRAGE levels. In turn, low levels of sRAGE are associated with both NAFLD and elevated ALT levels. These findings, if confirmed in prospective studies, may help to understand the molecular mediators of lifestyle factors and their role in the pathogenesis of NAFLD and aid in designing future treatment strategies.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Article guarantor: Shira Zelber Sagi, RD, PhD.

Specific author contributions: Ivancovsky-Wajcman Dana, RD and Zelber-Sagi Shira, RD, PhD, contributed equally to this work. I.-W.D. designed the study, carried out the data collection and analysis, and wrote the manuscript; Z.-S.S. conceived and designed the study, supervised the data collection and analysis, and wrote the manuscript; F.I.N. designed the study and carried out the data collection; W.M. performed the ultrasonography evaluation and critically reviewed the manuscript; Z.M. carried out the data collection; S.O. critically reviewed the manuscript; and K.R. conceived and designed the study, supervised the data collection, and critically reviewed the manuscript.

Financial support: Research Grants and Fellowships Fund on Food and Nutrition and their Implications on Public Health, The Israeli Ministry of Health.

Potential competing interests: None.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Study Highlights


  • ✓ NAFLD is positively associated with AGEs and negatively associated with sRAGE levels.
  • ✓ Smoking is negatively associated with sRAGE levels.
Back to Top | Article Outline


  • ✓ sRAGE levels are negatively and independently associated with elevated ALT and with NAFLD and elevated ALT.
  • ✓ Red and/or processed meat consumption, pack-years, working time, and sedentary time are negatively associated with sRAGE levels.
  • ✓ Exercise is positively associated with sRAGE levels.
Back to Top | Article Outline


  • ✓ sRAGE may serve as a therapeutic target for NAFLD.
Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Younossi Z, Anstee QM, Marietti M, et al. Global burden of NAFLD and NASH: Trends, predictions, risk factors and prevention. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018;15:11–20.
2. Armstrong MJ, Houlihan DD, Bentham L, et al. Presence and severity of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in a large prospective primary care cohort. J Hepatol 2012;56:234–40.
3. Liu Y, Dai M, Bi Y, et al. Active smoking, passive smoking, and risk of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): A population-based study in China. J Epidemiol 2013;23:115–21.
4. Zein CO, Unalp A, Colvin R, et al. Smoking and severity of hepatic fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol 2011;54:753–9.
5. Katsagoni CN, Georgoulis M, Papatheodoridis GV, et al. Effects of lifestyle interventions on clinical characteristics of patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A meta-analysis. Metab Clin Exp 2017;68:119–32.
6. Romero-Gomez M, Zelber-Sagi S, Trenell M. Treatment of NAFLD with diet, physical activity and exercise. J Hepatol 2017;67:829–46.
7. Zelber-Sagi S, Ivancovsky-Wajcman D, Fliss Isakov N, et al. High red and processed meat consumption is associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and insulin resistance. J Hepatol 2018;68:1239–46.
8. Zelber-Sagi S, Nitzan-Kaluski D, Goldsmith R, et al. Long term nutritional intake and the risk for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): A population based study. J Hepatol 2007;47:711–7.
9. Jia Q, Xia Y, Zhang Q, et al. Dietary patterns are associated with prevalence of fatty liver disease in adults. Eur J Clin Nutr 2015;69:914–21.
10. Zelber-Sagi S, Salomone F, Mlynarsky L. The mediterranean dietary pattern as the diet of choice for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Evidence and plausible mechanisms. Liver Int 2017;37:936–49.
11. Ma J, Hennein R, Liu C, et al. Improved diet quality associates with reduction in liver fat, particularly in individuals with high genetic risk scores for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology 2018;155:107–17.
12. Kellow NJ, Savige GS. Dietary advanced glycation end-product restriction for the attenuation of insulin resistance, oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction: A systematic review. Eur J Clin Nutr 2013;67:239–48.
13. Ramasamy R, Yan SF, Schmidt AM. Advanced glycation endproducts: From precursors to RAGE: Round and round we go. Amino Acids 2012;42:1151–61.
14. Takeuchi M, Takino J, Furuno S, et al. Assessment of the concentrations of various advanced glycation end-products in beverages and foods that are commonly consumed in Japan. PLoS One 2015;10:e0118652.
15. Teichert T, Hellwig A, Peßler A, et al. Association between advanced glycation end products and impaired fasting glucose: Results from the SALIA study. PLoS One 2015;10:e0128293.
16. Uribarri J, Woodruff S, Goodman S, et al. Advanced glycation end products in foods and a practical guide to their reduction in the diet. J Am Diet Assoc 2010;110:911–e12.
17. Schmidt AM. Soluble RAGEs: Prospects for treating & tracking metabolic and inflammatory disease. Vascul Pharmacol 2015;72:1–8.
18. Choi KM, Han KA, Ahn HJ, et al. Effects of exercise on sRAGE levels and cardiometabolic risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012;97:3751–8.
19. Zelber-Sagi S, Salomone F, Kolodkin-Gal I, et al. Protective role of soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-products in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Dig Liver Dis 2017;49:523–9.
20. Yilmaz Y, Ulukaya E, Gul OO, et al. Decreased plasma levels of soluble receptor for advanced glycation endproducts (sRAGE) in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin Biochem 2009;42:802–7.
21. Santilli F, Blardi P, Scapellato C, et al. Decreased plasma endogenous soluble RAGE, and enhanced adipokine secretion, oxidative stress and platelet/coagulative activation identify non-alcoholic fatty liver disease among patients with familial combined hyperlipidemia and/or metabolic syndrome. Vascul Pharmacol 2015;72:16–24.
22. Moy KA, Jiao L, Freedman ND, et al. Soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products and risk of liver cancer. Hepatology 2013;57:2338–45.
23. Palma-Duran SA, Kontogianni MD, Vlassopoulos A, et al. Serum levels of advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) and the decoy soluble receptor for AGEs (sRAGE) can discriminate non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in age-, sex- and BMI-matched normo-glycemic adults. Metabolism 2018;83:120–7.
24. Davis KE, Prasad C, Vijayagopal P, et al. Serum soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products correlates inversely with measures of adiposity in young adults. Nutr Res 2014;34:478–85.
25. Brix JM, Höllerl F, Kopp HP, et al. The soluble form of the receptor of advanced glycation endproducts increases after bariatric surgery in morbid obesity. Int J Obes (Lond) 2012;36:1412–7.
26. Kotani K, Caccavello R, Sakane N, et al. Influence of physical activity intervention on circulating soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products in elderly subjects. J Clin Med Res 2011;3:252–7.
27. Sponder M, Campean IA, Emich M, et al. Long-term physical activity leads to a significant increase in serum sRAGE levels: A sign of decreased AGE-mediated inflammation due to physical activity? Heart Vessels 2018;33:893–900.
28. Iwamoto H, Gao J, Pulkkinen V, et al. Soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-products and progression of airway disease. BMC Pulm Med 2014;14:68.
29. European Association for the Study of the Liver, European Association for the Study of Diabetes, European Association for the Study of Obesity. EASL-EASD-EASO clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol 2016;64:1388–402.
30. Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, et al. The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Practice guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology 2018;67:328–57.
31. Wilett W. Nutritional Epidemiology. Oxford University Press: New York, 1998.
32. Keinan-Boker L, Noyman N, Chinich A, et al. Overweight and obesity prevalence in Israel: Findings of the first national health and nutrition survey (MABAT). Isr Med Assoc J 2005;7:219–23.
33. Webb M, Yeshua H, Zelber-Sagi S, et al. Diagnostic value of a computerized hepatorenal index for sonographic quantification of liver steatosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:909–14.
34. Baratta F, Pastori D, Polimeni L, et al. Adherence to mediterranean diet and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Effect on insulin resistance. Am J Gastroenterol 2017;112:1832–9.
35. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2017 abridged for primary care providers. Clin Diabetes 2017;35:5–26.
36. Isokuortti E, Zhou Y, Peltonen M, et al. Use of HOMA-IR to diagnose non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A population-based and inter-laboratory study. Diabetologia 2017;60:1873–82.
37. Jakobsen MU, Berentzen T, Sørensen TI, et al. Abdominal obesity and fatty liver. Epidemiol Rev 2007;29:77–87.
38. Kwo PY, Cohen SM, Lim JK. ACG clinical guideline: Evaluation of abnormal liver chemistries. Am J Gastroenterol 2017;112:18–35.
39. Boada LD, Henríquez-Hernández LA, Luzardo OP. The impact of red and processed meat consumption on cancer and other health outcomes: Epidemiological evidences. Food Chem Toxicol 2016;92:236–44.
40. Bouvard V, Loomis D, Guyton KZ, et al. Carcinogenicity of consumption of red and processed meat. Lancet Oncol 2015;16:1599–600.
41. Uribarri J, Cai W, Ramdas M, et al. Restriction of advanced glycation end products improves insulin resistance in human type 2 diabetes: Potential role of AGER1 and SIRT1. Diabetes Care 2011;34:1610–6.
42. Clarke RE, Dordevic AL, Tan SM, et al. Dietary advanced glycation end products and risk factors for chronic disease: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Nutrients 2016;8:125.
43. Gopal P, Reynaert NL, Scheijen JL, et al. Association of plasma sRAGE, but not esRAGE with lung function impairment in COPD. Respir Res 2014;15:24.
44. Momma H, Niu K, Kobayashi Y, et al. Lower serum endogenous secretory receptor for advanced glycation end product level as a risk factor of metabolic syndrome among Japanese adult men: A 2-year longitudinal study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2014;99:587–93.
45. Birkenfeld AL, Shulman GI. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, hepatic insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes. Hepatology 2014;59:713–23.
46. Choi Y, Lee JE, Chang Y, et al. Dietary sodium and potassium intake in relation to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Br J Nutr 2016;116:1447–56.
47. Kim Y, Keogh J, Clifton P. A review of potential metabolic etiologies of the observed association between red meat consumption and development of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Metabolism 2015;64:768–79.
48. Hyogo H, Yamagishi S, Iwamoto K, et al. Elevated levels of serum advanced glycation end products in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007;22:1112–9.
49. de Courten B, de Courten MP, Soldatos G, et al. Diet low in advanced glycation end products increases insulin sensitivity in healthy overweight individuals: A double-blind, randomized, crossover trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2016;103:1426–33.
50. D'Adamo E, Giannini C, Chiavaroli V, et al. What is the significance of soluble and endogenous secretory receptor for advanced glycation end products in liver steatosis in obese prepubertal children? Antioxid Redox Signal 2011;14:1167–72.
51. Hudson BI, Dong C, Gardener H, et al. Serum levels of soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-products and metabolic syndrome: The northern manhattan study. Metab Clin Exp 2014;63:1125–30.
52. Ruiz-Nunez B, Pruimboom L, Dijck-Brouwer DA, et al. Lifestyle and nutritional imbalances associated with western diseases: Causes and consequences of chronic systemic low-grade inflammation in an evolutionary context. J Nutr Biochem 2013;24:1183–201.
53. Devangelio E, Santilli F, Formoso G, et al. Soluble RAGE in type 2 diabetes: Association with oxidative stress. Free Radic Biol Med 2007;43:511–8.

Supplemental Digital Content

Back to Top | Article Outline
© 2019 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.