Secondary Logo

Response to Sachdeva et al: Brain Fogginess and SIBO Is Not a Mirage

Rao, Satish S. C.1; Yu, Siegfried1

Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology: October 2018 - Volume 9 - Issue 10 - p e194
doi: 10.1038/s41424-018-0061-0
CORRESPONDENCE: Open Access
Free

1Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA

Correspondence: Satish S. C. Rao (srao@augusta.edu)

Figure

Figure

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Conflict of interest

Guarantor of the article: Satish S.C. Rao, M.D., Ph.D., FRCP (LON).

Specific author contributions: S.S.C.R. and S.Y. wrote the letter.

Financial support: None.

Potential competing interests: None.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Received: 14 September 2018 Accepted: 17 September 2018

Published online: 05 October 2018

We thank Prof. Sachdeva and colleagues for their useful comments, and pleased that they found this article “fascinating” and “thought provoking”, and happy to respond to their concerns. (1) Is Brain Fogginess a center-point to SIBO? We believe that BF is a feature in a select group of SIBO patients in whom the small bowel is colonized with Dlactic acid producing organisms, particularly lactobacillus species, contained in probiotics. We emphasize that not all SIBO patients have BF or colonization with these organisms. Also, with only seven publications on BF, Sachdeva et al. have accepted that BF occurs in POTS, fibromyalgia, etc.; but are suspicious of this in SIBO; it is time that gastroenterologists recognize that BF can be a manifestation of SIBO. (2) Objective test for BF? There is no definition or validated questionnaire or objective test for BF according to neurologists we have discussed, and hence could not perform any tests. We are currently validating a questionnaire. (3) Is BF and SIBO linked? Absolutely, and was the essence of our study. BF was reproduced in 66% of subjects during the breath test, and most of them had evidence of SIBO (GBT or culture). The lower yield (sensitivity) of GBT and duodenal aspirate is consistent with multiple other studies1,2,3, as they only measure proximal SIBO and miss distal SIBO. (4) BF not related to lactic acidosis? Our patients did not report BF 24 h a day. It would wax and wane, but a majority experienced this postprandially. Hence, we tested them with a GBT; both to assess whether BF can be reproduced in the lab, and to validate that it was not an imaginary or supratentorial (functional) symptom, as well as to identify its association with SIBO. The fact that in almost all in whom the urinary D-Lactic acid increased did occur after a glucose meal and was associated with BF proves the link between BF and D-lactic acidosis. (5) Lack of reproducibility of BF on breath testing challenges link with SIBO? As discussed above and by Rezai et al. in North American Consensus3, current modalities for SIBO testing are imperfect. The small bowel is 19 ft long, and can be colonized anywhere. In contrast, glucose when administered orally is absorbed within the first 3–6 ft of small bowel, and duodenal aspirates are typically from the proximal 2 ft of small bowel. Hence, to rely on glucose breath testing alone to make a diagnosis of SIBO will provide a low yield of about 33% and miss many other patients. This was a reason why we used two tests, both GBT and duodenal aspirates to maximize the detection of SIBO in our patients. Therefore, the author's contention that many patients with a negative GBT had D-lactic acidosis and/or BF makes it unlikely that they had SIBO, is inaccurate.

Finally, we would encourage them to use our protocol and identify this syndrome in their patient population, and relieve their suffering, and yes we are now performing a post-treatment study.

Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Jacobs C, Coss-Adame E, Attaluri A, Valestin J, Rao S.S. Dysmotility and proton pump inhibitor use are independent risk factors for small intestinal bacterial and/or fungal overgrowth. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 37, 1103-1111 (2013).
2. Erdogan A. et al. Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth: Duodenal aspiration vs. glucose breath test. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 27, 481-489 (2015).
3. Rezaie A. et al. Hydrogen and methane-based breath testing in gastrointestinal disorders: The North American Consensus. Am J Gastroenterol. 112, 775-785 (2017).
© 2018 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.