Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Comparison of Early Surgical Experience and Visual Outcomes of DSAEK and DMEK

Green, Matthew MBBS, FRANZCO; Wilkins, Mark R. MBBS, FRCOphth

doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000590
Clinical Science

Purpose: To compare the outcomes of 2 different endothelial keratoplasty (EK) techniques [Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK)] sequentially learned by a corneal fellow.

Methods: This is a retrospective comparative audit of all patients undergoing EK by 1 surgeon (M.G.) during fellowship. Surgical and functional success of both procedures were compared. Surgical success was evaluated by comparing short-term complications, and functional success by comparing visual outcomes in patients with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (FED).

Results: Twenty-six patients were included in the review (DSAEK 12 and DMEK 14). Phacoemulsification was combined with EK in 14 patients (DSAEK 6 and DMEK 8). The average follow-up duration was 3.5 months. Partial detachment requiring rebubbling was slightly more common in the DMEK group (DSAEK 1 and DMEK 5); total detachment requiring repositioning was less in the DMEK group (DSAEK 2 and DMEK 1). Only 1 patient experienced primary graft failure due to complicated graft insertion, and this patient underwent DMEK. Functional analysis included 14 patients with FED (DSAEK 7 patients, preoperative 6/18, postoperative 6/12; DMEK 7 patients, preoperative 6/12, postoperative 6/6). Average visual improvement was greater in the DMEK group (3.3 lines) than in the DSAEK group (1.3 lines; P = 0.047). In DMEK patients, the average postoperative endothelial cell count was 1612 cells per square centimeter.

Conclusions: Contrary to common expectation, there were similar rates of surgical success while learning DMEK and DSAEK. Visual improvement in patients with FED undergoing DMEK was significantly better at this early point of comparison.

*Corneal and External Disease Service, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom; and

Ophthalmology Department, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Australia.

Reprints: Matthew Green, MBBS, FRANZCO, Tweed Eye Doctors, 56 Wharf St, Tweed Heads, 2485, Australia (e-mail:

The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose.

Presented as a poster at the 2014 RANZCO Scientific Meeting, RANZCO Scientific Congress, Brisbane, Australia, November 22–26, 2014.

Received January 08, 2015

Received in revised form June 07, 2015

Accepted July 06, 2015

Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.