Secondary Logo

Journal Logo


Long-term complications of urinary diversion

Amini, Erfana; Djaladat, Hoomanb

Author Information
doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000222
  • Free



Bladder cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer in men. Improvements in cancer care have led to patients living longer. Five-year relative survival rates in patients with localized and regional bladder cancer have been reported to be 69 and 34%, respectively [1]. Depending on tumor characteristics, many patients require radical cystectomy with lymph node dissection and urinary diversion. For diversion, various techniques including ileal conduit, orthotopic neobladder (ONB) and continent cutaneous urinary diversion (CCUD) may be utilized based on patient characteristics and surgeon preferences. Although the proportion of patients undergoing incontinent diversions has been reported to be as high as 92% [2], recent data from high-volume centers suggests that both ONB and CCUD are commonly performed [3]. The purpose of this article is to review long-term complications of different diversion types following radical cystectomy and strategies to prevent or treat them. A systematic search of Medline, Embase, and Scopus electronic databases was conducted to retrieve English language original and review articles addressing different categories of long-term complications after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Box 1
Box 1:
no caption available


Renal function deterioration rate after urinary diversion ranges from 20% to more than 70% in different series [4–7,8▪,9] (Table 1). This wide range is because of variations in definition, measurements, and length of follow-up in different studies. Some studies have considered a 25% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) compared with baseline as a sign of renal function deterioration [8▪] whereas others defined renal function deterioration as more than 10 ml/min/1.73 m2 reduction in eGFR [5–7]. Various methods have also been applied to assess renal function. Recent studies have employed Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation to calculate eGFR that provides the most precise assessment of renal function [7,9].

Table 1
Table 1:
Long-term renal function in patients undergoing radical cystectomy and urinary diversion

Deterioration of renal function after urinary diversion may be a consequence of complications related to the diversion including recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs), obstructive uropathy, and factors impertinent to urinary diversion, such as age, medications, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus. In a recent study, assessing 322 patients with urinary diversion, longer follow-up was associated with a higher rate of renal function deterioration. Risk of renal function deterioration at 1, 3, and 5 years after CCUD was 24, 29, and 42%, respectively, which was comparable with other diversion methods [7]. Eisenberg et al.[6] in a study with a median follow-up of 10.5 years revealed that risk of renal function decline is 71 and 74% in patients with incontinent and continent urinary diversions, respectively. Therefore, irrespective of diversion type, a significant number of patients may experience renal function deterioration; however, rate of end-stage renal disease remains quite low [4,7]. Despite the relatively younger age and more favorable baseline renal function in patients with continent diversions, studies assessing long-term changes in renal function have failed to show the type of urinary diversion as a significant predictor of postoperative renal function deterioration [5–7,8▪]. Deterioration of renal function after radical cystectomy and urinary diversion requires special attention as some studies have demonstrated a significantly higher risk of cardiovascular disease and subsequent mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease [10].


Voiding dysfunction in ONB patients is divided into problems of filling (storage) and voiding (emptying). In several large series addressing functional outcomes of ONB, continence rate ranges between 57 and 100% [11–21] (Table 2). Daytime continence initially improves followed by nocturnal control as the capacity of neobladder increases. In a series of 166 patients, the Copenhagen group, reported night-time continence rates of 75 and 94% at 1 and 3 years, respectively [12]. Failure of emptying may also occur in patients with ONB. Urinary retention usually appears months after orthotopic diversion; however, it can even occur years after good neobladder function [21]. It occurs more frequently in women and the incidence varies from 11 to 70% in the literature [22▪▪]. Anderson et al.[19] assessed 49 women with ONB for a mean follow-up period of 3.1 years; daytime incontinence, night-time incontinence, and emptying failure occurred in 43, 55, and 31% of women, respectively. They also noted that incontinence is associated with a history of concurrent or previous hysterectomy. Although the cause is not established, it might be related to posterior prolapse of the neobladder during the valsalva maneuver and consequent kinking of the urethra. Utilizing peritoneal or omental flap to fill the posterior pelvis as well as anterior and superior fixation of the reservoir may prevent prolapse and decrease hypercontinence rate [2]. Inadequate emptying is uncommon in men with ONB diversion. In a series of 655 men, Simon et al.[23] observed residual urine volume of above 100 ml in 11.5% of men with ONB diversion. Mechanical obstruction (i.e., benign neovesicourethral anastomosis strictures or local tumor recurrence) was the major cause of incomplete emptying, although we have not observed this in our series. In a randomized trial comparing Studer versus T pouch, a total of 179 patients were assessed for voiding dysfunction in a mean follow-up period of 4.5 years [20]. Seventy patients (39.7%) reported daily urinary leakage and 30 (16.8%) had no control/frequent dribbling during the day. Intermittent catheterization was necessary in 17 (9.5%) patients. Age and diabetes mellitus were predictors of voiding dysfunction whereas pouch type did not [20]. However, applying colonic segments and non-nerve-sparing techniques have been suggested as risk factors for urinary incontinence after ONB reconstruction [17]. Lifestyle modification and behavioral therapy, that is, limited fluid intake at night, timed voiding, double voiding, and pelvic floor muscle training have been proposed as therapeutic strategies to improve functional outcomes after ONB diversion.

Table 2
Table 2:
Long-term voiding function outcome in patients undergoing radical cystectomy and continent urinary diversion


Stoma-related complications are among the most frequent complications in patients with CCUD and ileal conduit; the incidence has been reported to be as high as 60% [24].

Stomal stenosis

Stomal stenosis is uncommon in patients with ileal conduit and the incidence ranges from 0 to 3% [4,7,25]. One of the largest studies to date at Mayo clinic reported conduit stricture in 2.4% of 1057 patients at a median follow-up of 9.4 years [4]. Nevertheless, complications pertinent to catheterizable stoma are among the most frequent and troublesome complications in patients with CCUD. Stomal stenosis and difficult catheterization occurs in up to 30% of patients with CCUD [26]. Nieuwenhuijzen et al.[25] noted that stomal stenosis requiring surgical revision occurred in 3 and 13% of patients after ileal conduit and Indiana pouch urinary diversion, respectively. Continence rate varies from 57 to 97.3% of CCUDs [26–28]. Continence mechanism utilized in CCUD may also affect the rate of stenosis in patients with CCUD. Vergho et al.[26] reported stenosis rate of 30 and 2.7% in 486 patients with appendicoumblical stoma and intussuscepted ileal nipple after a mean follow-up period of 90.3 months, respectively. Urinary leakage with a CCUD may occur as a consequence of incompetent continence mechanism, uninhibited contractions, or poor compliance reservoir. A trial of anticholinergics may be beneficial in patients with high-pressure, poor compliant reservoirs. When the problem is refractory, surgical intervention to increase the capacity becomes necessary.

Parastomal hernia

Parastomal hernia leads to protrusion of peritoneal content through the abdominal wall defect next to stoma with incidence ranging from 2.3 to 48% [29–32]. This variation may be related to different clinicoradiological criteria used to define the parastomal hernia. Parastomal hernia can negatively impact the quality of life as it could be associated with discomfort and improper fitting of the ostomy appliance. Occasionally, parastomal hernia leads to urinary or bowel obstruction, strangulation, and bowel perforation. Parastomal hernia is a clinical diagnosis; however, radiologic evaluation is more accurate. Moreno-Matias et al. proposed a clinicoradiological classification system to determine three different types of parastomal hernia. In type 1, hernia sac contains the prolapsed bowel loop forming the stoma. Type 2 contains abdominal fat or omentum and type 3 has herniated bowel loops other than the stoma [33]. Donahue et al.[32] used this classification system and showed that types 1, 2, and 3 parastomal hernia developed in five (4%), 90 (66%), and 41 (30%) patients 2 years after ileal conduit urinary diversion, respectively. On multivariable analysis, female sex, higher BMI, and lower preoperative albumin were significantly associated with risk of parastomal hernia [32]. In a study from the University of Southern California with more than 15 years follow-up, parastomal hernia was found to be the most common stoma-related complication occurring in 30% of patients with ileal conduit [34]. In a retrospective analysis of Indiana University cystectomy database, Liu et al.[35] showed that the cumulative risk of parastomal hernia formation was 12.2 and 22.5%, at 1 and 2 years after cystectomy, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that prior laparotomy and severe obesity were predictors of parastomal herniation. Surgical repair of parastomal hernia is a challenging procedure and may be associated with unsatisfactory results and high recurrence rate. Approximately half of patients require surgery because of abdominal discomfort and/or intestinal complications [36].


Ureteroenteric stricture (UES) usually occurs within a few months after radical cystectomy [37▪▪]. In a large series of 1964 open radical cystectomy patients from the University of Southern California, 49 patients and 51 (2.6%) renal units were retrospectively identified with benign UES, with a median follow-up period of 12.4 years [37▪▪]. UES is more common on the left side and usually presents with flank pain and/or UTI and, however, could be asymptomatic up to one-third of cases [37▪▪]. In a study by Richards et al.[38], overall stricture rate per ureter was 5.9% on the right versus 10.0% on the left. Shah et al.[37▪▪] used a multivariate logistic regression model that revealed no association between age, BMI, comorbidity, perioperative radiation or chemotherapy, and risk of UES formation. Surgical technique seems to play an important role in occurrence of UES and benign UES is uncommon when a consistent meticulous surgical technique is used [37▪▪]. Anderson et al.[39] reported a UES rate of 8.5 and 12% in 375 and 103 patients who underwent open and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy, albeit the difference was not statistically significant. Both endourological and open approaches have been utilized for treating UES. The overall success rates seem to be lower with endourological procedures with 50% retreatment rate [40].


Bowel obstruction

Bowel obstruction is a common cause of readmission in patients after radical cystectomy [4]. In a large series of 1057 patients, bowel obstruction was found to be the most common complication occurring in 16% of patients at a median follow-up period of 1.7 years [4]. In another study of 1000 radical cystectomy patients, bowel obstruction was observed in 3.6% of patients 20 years postoperatively [41]. Late-onset bowel obstruction may be a consequence of stenosis of the ileoileal anastomosis or intraperitoneal adhesion bands. Nevertheless, peritoneal carcinomatosis should also be ruled out, if indicated.

Fistula formation

Both neobladder-vaginal and entero-neobladder fistula may occur as a complication of urinary diversion. In a report of 51 women who underwent radical cystectomy and ONB, neobladder-vaginal fistula was reported in three (6%) women [19]. Entero-neobladder fistula usually occurs between small bowel anastomosis and neobladder and presents with fecaluria, pneumaturia, and recurrent UTIs [42]. Large series have reported an incidence of less than 3% for entero-neobladder fistula [4,42]. Total parenteral nutrition and urinary catheter drainage are the mainstay in conservative management of fistula. However, the majority of patients require open surgical correction and recurrent cancer must be ruled out in suspicious cases [42].

Pouch perforation

Neobladder/pouch perforation is a rare complication associated with urinary diversion and has been described in several small case series. Perforation may occur by traumatic catheterization or blunt trauma to a full neobladder/pouch. Immediate laparotomy and repair of the neobladder/pouch is necessary as the rupture usually occurs intraperitoneally [41]. However, there are some reports of conservative management in the literature [7].


Urinary diversion is associated with acid base and electrolyte abnormalities. Several factors including the segment of the bowel used for diversion, the surface area of the bowel, and the amount of time the urine is exposed to the enteric segment influence the severity of metabolic consequences. Ileum absorbs chloride and excretes bicarbonate that results in metabolic acidosis. Metabolic acidosis has been reported to be the principal cause of readmissions in patients after radical cystectomy [43]. Although chronic metabolic acidosis exists in more than 70% of patients with urinary diversion [43], severe metabolic acidosis occurs in 1% of patients. In a series of 363 men with ONB, Hautmann et al.[11] reported that nearly one-half of all patients required some form of alkalinizing treatment. In response to metabolic acidosis, bone buffers the excess protons and releases calcium. Moreover, chronic metabolic acidosis inhibits osteoblast activity, stimulates osteoclast bone resorption, and might lead to osteoporosis. A population-based study using SEER-Medicare database evaluated the incidence of fracture in 50 520 patients of whom 4878 had cystectomy and revealed that cystectomy is associated with a 21% greater risk of fracture [44].

Metabolic complications occur less frequently in patients with incontinent diversion. In a large series of 1057 patients who underwent radical cystectomy with conduit urinary diversion using ileum or colon, Shimko et al.[4] reported that metabolic abnormalities were among the least common complications occurring in 12.8% of patients. Resection of terminal ileum also leads to B12 deficiency with incidence of 0–33% [4,11,12]. This variability may be due to the differences in length of resected ileum, assessment methods, and follow-up. Symptomatically, when body supply is depleted megaloblastic anemia and severe neurologic injuries may occur. It has been suggested to monitor vitamin B12 annually beginning 3–5 years after surgery [45].


Patients with urinary diversions are susceptible to bacteriuria and developing pyelonephritis. Wood et al.[46] reported asymptomatic bacteriuria in 78% of their patients with ONB and only half of them developed symptomatic UTI. Pyelonephritis has been reported to be among the most common causes of admissions in patients with urinary diversion [43]. Up to 17% of patients with conduits experience acute pyelonephritis with subsequent renal function deterioration especially when the affecting organism is proteus or pseudomonas [47]. The rate of UTI has been reported to be similar between various types of diversion [7]. Moreover, age, sex, intermittent catheterization, bowel segment used for reconstruction, and perioperative chemotherapy has no effect on rates of UTI [48]. Urosepsis usually occurs in the context of recurrent symptomatic UTIs. Therefore, suppressive or prophylactic antibiotic therapy may be unnecessary unless a history of recurrent UTIs exists [46].


Patients with urinary diversion are more likely to develop urolithiasis. Metabolic acidosis and short bowel syndrome may result in hypocitraturia and hyperoxaluria, respectively [49]. Struvite stones may also form because of infection or bacterial colonization of the reservoir. Moreover, exposed staples represent a nidus and facilitate stone formation in patients with diversion. Ferriero et al.[50] assessed the risk of stone formation in stapled neobladder in 445 consecutive patients with ONB diversion. At a median follow-up of 41 months, neobladder stone formation occurred in 41 (9.2%) patients. Risk of stone formation increased over time and was 8, 19.5, and 24.9% at 3, 5, and 7-year follow-up, respectively. Cystoscopic evaluation revealed that staple lines were usually covered by ileal mucosa. However, in 15 cases (36.6%), the stones were anchored to titanium staples. Although the effect of staples in stone formation within reservoirs has not been evaluated in randomized studies, slightly higher incidence of stone formation has been reported in series using staples [12,50] compared with hand-sewn reservoirs [11,14].

Risk of urolithiasis seems to be similar between various types of urinary diversion [7]. Nevertheless, female sex has been postulated to be a risk factor for stone formation within ONB that is consistent with higher need for intermittent catheterization [50]. Treating metabolic and electrolyte disturbances are important preventive measures. In addition, patient counseling for appropriate hydration and adequate reservoir emptying is of value in patients with continent diversion.


The overall long-term complication rate of urinary diversion has been reported to be as high as 60%. Stoma-related complications followed by UTI are among the most common complications. This emphasizes on importance of long-term, regular follow-ups in these patients.



Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.


Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • ▪ of special interest
  • ▪▪ of outstanding interest


1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 2015; 65:5–29.
2. Hautmann RE, Abol-Enein H, Davidsson T, et al. ICUD-EAU International Consultation on Bladder Cancer 2012: urinary diversion. Eur Urol 2013; 63:67–80.
3. Kim SP, Shah ND, Weight CJ, et al. Population-based trends in urinary diversion among patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. BJU Int 2013; 112:478–484.
4. Shimko MS, Tollefson MK, Umbreit EC, et al. Long-term complications of conduit urinary diversion. J Urol 2011; 185:562–567.
5. Jin XD, Roethlisberger S, Burkhard FC, et al. Long-term renal function after urinary diversion by ileal conduit or orthotopic ileal bladder substitution. Eur Urol 2012; 61:491–497.
6. Eisenberg MS, Thompson RH, Frank I, et al. Long-term renal function outcomes after radical cystectomy. J Urol 2014; 191:619–625.
7. Al Hussein Al Awamlh B, Wang LC, Nguyen DP, et al. Is continent cutaneous urinary diversion a suitable alternative to orthotopic bladder substitute and ileal conduit after cystectomy? BJU Int 2014; [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1111/bju.12919.
8▪. Nishikawa M, Miyake H, Yamashita M, et al. Long-term changes in renal function outcomes following radical cystectomy and urinary diversion. Int J Clin Oncol 2014; 19:1105–1111.

Interesting data on long-term changes in renal function following different types of urinary diversion.

9. Gershman B, Eisenberg MS, Thompson RH, et al. Comparative impact of continent and incontinent urinary diversion on long-term renal function after radical cystectomy in patients with preoperative chronic kidney disease 2 and chronic kidney disease 3a. Int J Urol 2015; 22:651–656.
10. Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, et al. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med 2004; 351:1296–1305.
11. Hautmann RE, de Petriconi R, Gottfried HW, et al. The ileal neobladder: complications and functional results in 363 patients after 11 years of followup. J Urol 1999; 161:422–427.
12. Steven K, Poulsen AL. The orthotopic Kock ileal neobladder: functional results, urodynamic features, complications and survival in 166 men. J Urol 2000; 164:288–295.
13. Abol-Enein H, Ghoneim MA. Functional results of orthotopic ileal neobladder with serous-lined extramural ureteral reimplantation: experience with 450 patients. J Urol 2001; 165:1427–1432.
14. Stein JP, Dunn MD, Quek ML, et al. The orthotopic T pouch ileal neobladder: experience with 209 patients. J Urol 2004; 172:584–587.
15. Carrion R, Arap S, Corcione G, et al. A multiinstitutional study of orthotopic neobladders: functional results in men and women. BJU Int 2004; 93:803–806.
16. Sevin G, Soyupek S, Armagan A, et al. Ileal orthotopic neobladder (modified Hautmann) via a shorter detubularized ileal segment: experience and results. BJU Int 2004; 94:355–359.
17. Studer UE, Burkhard FC, Schumacher M, et al. Twenty years experience with an ileal orthotopic low pressure bladder substitute-lessons to be learned. J Urol 2006; 176:161–166.
18. Novara G, Ficarra V, Minja A, et al. Functional results following vescica ileale Padovana (VIP) neobladder: midterm follow-up analysis with validated questionnaires. Eur Urol 2010; 57:1045–1051.
19. Anderson CB, Cookson MS, Chang SS, et al. Voiding function in women with orthotopic neobladder urinary diversion. J Urol 2012; 188:200–204.
20. Ahmadi H, Skinner EC, Simma-Chiang V, et al. Urinary functional outcome following radical cystoprostatectomy and ileal neobladder reconstruction in male patients. J Urol 2013; 189:1782–1788.
21. Dellis AE, Papatsoris AG, Skolarikos AA, et al. Modified S-ileal neobladder for continent urinary diversion: functional and urodynamic results after 20 years of follow-up. Urol Int 2014; 93:43–48.
22▪▪. Lee RK, Abol-Enein H, Artibani W, et al. Urinary diversion after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: options, patient selection, and outcomes. BJU Int 2014; 113:11–23.

A superb review addressing the outcomes of various types of urinary diversion.

23. Simon J, Bartsch G Jr, Kufer R, et al. Neobladder emptying failure in males: incidence, etiology and therapeutic options. J Urol 2006; 176:1468–1472.
24. Farnham SB, Cookson MS. Surgical complications of urinary diversion. World J Urol 2004; 22:157–167.
25. Nieuwenhuijzen JA, de Vries RR, Bex A, et al. Urinary diversions after cystectomy: the association of clinical factors, complications and functional results of four different diversions. Eur Urol 2008; 53:834–842.
26. Vergho D, Kocot A, Bauer C, Riedmiller H. Insufficiency of the efferent segment in continent cutaneous diversion. Urologe A 2012; 51:485–493.
27. Redshaw JD, Elliott SP, Rosenstein DI, et al. Procedures needed to maintain functionality of adult continent catheterizable channels: a comparison of continent cutaneous ileal cecocystoplasty with tunneled catheterizable channels. J Urol 2014; 192:821–826.
28. Abol-Enein H, Salem M, Mesbah A, et al. Continent cutaneous ileal pouch using the serous lined extramural valves. The Mansoura experience in more than 100 patients. J Urol 2004; 172:588–591.
29. Kouba E, Sands M, Lentz A, et al. Incidence and risk factors of stomal complications in patients undergoing cystectomy with ileal conduit urinary diversion for bladder cancer. J Urol 2007; 178:950–954.
30. Nastro P, Knowles CH, McGrath A, et al. Complications of intestinal stomas. Br J Surg 2010; 97:1885–1889.
31. Pilgrim CH, McIntyre R, Bailey M. Prospective audit of parastomal hernia: prevalence and associated comorbidities. Dis Colon Rectum 2010; 53:71–76.
32. Donahue TF, Bochner BH, Sfakianos JP, et al. Risk factors for the development of parastomal hernia after radical cystectomy. J Urol 2014; 191:1708–1713.
33. Moreno-Matias J, Serra-Aracil X, Darnell-Martin A, et al. The prevalence of parastomal hernia after formation of an end colostomy. A new clinico-radiological classification. Colorectal Dis 2009; 11:173–177.
34. Maidaa M, Miranda G, Gill I, et al. MP5-01 long-term clinical outcome and complications after radical cystectomy and ileal conduit. J Urol 2014; 191:e82.
35. Liu NW, Hackney JT, Gellhaus PT, et al. Incidence and risk factors of parastomal hernia in patients undergoing radical cystectomy and ileal conduit diversion. J Urol 2014; 191:1313–1318.
36. Hotouras A, Murphy J, Thaha M, Chan CL. The persistent challenge of parastomal herniation: a review of the literature and future developments. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15:e202–e214.
37▪▪. Shah SH, Movassaghi K, Skinner D, et al. Ureteroenteric strictures after open radical cystectomy and urinary diversion: the University of Southern California experience. Urology 2015; 86:87–91.

A contemporary study addressing ureteroenteric strictures after radical cystectomy with a quite large sample size, long-term follow-up, and interesting findings.

38. Richards KA, Cohn JA, Large MC, et al. The effect of length of ureteral resection on benign ureterointestinal stricture rate in ileal conduit or ileal neobladder urinary diversion following radical cystectomy. Urol Oncol 2015; 33:65.e61–65.e68.
39. Anderson CB, Morgan TM, Kappa S, et al. Ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures after radical cystectomy-does operative approach matter? J Urol 2013; 189:541–547.
40. Schondorf D, Meierhans-Ruf S, Kiss B, et al. Ureteroileal strictures after urinary diversion with an ileal segment-is there a place for endourological treatment at all? J Urol 2013; 190:585–590.
41. Hautmann RE, de Petriconi RC, Volkmer BG. 25 years of experience with 1000 neobladders: long-term complications. J Urol 2011; 185:2207–2212.
42. Msezane L, Reynolds WS, Mhapsekar R, et al. Open surgical repair of ureteral strictures and fistulas following radical cystectomy and urinary diversion. J Urol 2008; 179:1428–1431.
43. Harraz AM, Osman Y, El-Halwagy S, et al. Risk factors of hospital readmission after radical cystectomy and urinary diversion: analysis of a large contemporary series. BJU Int 2015; 115:94–100.
44. Gupta A, Atoria CL, Ehdaie B, et al. Risk of fracture after radical cystectomy and urinary diversion for bladder cancer. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32:3291–3298.
45. Krajewski W, Piszczek R, Krajewska M, et al. Urinary diversion metabolic complications – underestimated problem. Adv Clin Exp Med 2014; 23:633–638.
46. Wood DP Jr, Bianco FJ Jr, Pontes JE, et al. Incidence and significance of positive urine cultures in patients with an orthotopic neobladder. J Urol 2003; 169:2196–2199.
47. McDougal WS. Bladder reconstruction following cystectomy by uretero-ileo-colourethrostomy. J Urol 1986; 135:698–701.
48. Mano R, Baniel J, Goldberg H, et al. Urinary tract infections in patients with orthotopic neobladder. Urol Oncol 2014; 32:50.e9–50.e14.
49. Okhunov Z, Duty B, Smith AD, Okeke Z. Management of urolithiasis in patients after urinary diversions. BJU Int 2011; 108:330–336.
50. Ferriero M, Guaglianone S, Papalia R, et al. Risk assessment of stone formation in stapled orthotopicileal neobladder. J Urol 2015; 193:891–896.

complications; cystectomy; long-term care; urinary diversion

Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.