Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Tips and tricks to robot-assisted radical cystectomy and intracorporeal diversion

Poch, Michael A.a; Raza, Joharb; Nyquist, Johna,b,c; Guru, Khurshid A.c

doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32835b65e9
ROBOTICS: Edited by Jim Hu

Purpose of review To summarize the fundamental principles for technique of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) based on current peer reviewed literature. Also provide most recent evidence for the efficacy of RARC and Intracorporeal Ileal Conduit (ICIC).

Recent findings Technical tricks have increased the efficiency of RARC and ICIC diversion. Perioperative and short-term outcomes have demonstrated that RARC is an acceptable alternative to open radical cystectomy. Acceptable positive surgical margin rates, thorough extended lymph node dissection based on tenets of oncological principles and acceptable short-term oncologic outcomes have been reported. Learning curve towards safe incorporation of intracorporeal urinary diversion and its evolution are presented.

Summary The technical tips and tricks have led to evolution of technique translating into improved surgical outcomes. RARC is a well tolerated and effective alternative to open cystectomy and urinary diversion. Intracorporeal urinary diversion is the next challenge on the horizon with an acceptable learning curve and outcomes; this evolution will lead to improvement in quality of life after this morbid surgical procedure.

aH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA

bShaukat Khanum Cancer Hospital and Research Center, Lahore, Pakistan

cDepartment of Urology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA

Correspondence to Khurshid A. Guru, Department of Urology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA.

Back to Top | Article Outline


‘In the long history of humankind (and animal kind, too) those who learned to collaborate and improvise most effectively have prevailed’.

-Charles Darwin

Open radical cystectomy (ORC) has been the gold standard for nonmuscle invasive high risk and muscle invasive bladder cancer. ORC has been associated with significant morbidity and mortality even at centers of excellence. With the introduction of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC), first reported by Menon in 2003 [1], its evolution and acceptable safe outcomes have led to its acceptance as an alternative for ORC [2,3,4▪]. As with any novel surgical procedure, technical challenges have been identified and addressed leading to an improved surgical procedure [5–7]. Several fundamental tenets that have been used to advance the surgical technique for RARC and Intracorporeal Ileal Conduit (ICIC) are described.

Back to Top | Article Outline


ORC has been the gold standard and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality even at centers of excellence. Introduction of RARC has brought in a new technical paradigm in pelvic urologic oncology.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Clear liquid diet the day prior to surgery and mechanical bowel preparation is based on the anticipated urinary diversion selected and surgeon's choice. ICIC does not require mechanical bowel preparation and this approach has been shown to be safe and effective. Preoperative antibiotics are administered according to the American Urologic Association guidelines [8].

Box 1

Box 1

Back to Top | Article Outline


Patient positioning for RARC and ICIC is similar to Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and the operating table is tilted at maximum trendellenburg (>200). Three 8 mm robotic trocars, 1–15 mm assistant port, 1–12 mm additional (bowel anastomosis) port and 1–5 mm suction port are used. The abdomen is insufflated using the Veress needle or Hassan technique. All ports are placed under direct vision.

Incorporation of ‘technique of spaces’ is critical for dividing a procedure with multiple steps, which helps with ease of teaching and keeping the procedure focused. Previous reports have described the technique of spaces as elements of the cystectomy dissection. [9] The four spaces of dissection are the periureteral space, lateral pelvic space, anterior rectal space, and retropubic space.

Back to Top | Article Outline


The dissection begins with an incision in the posterior peritoneum above the iliac vessels and identification of the ureter. Ureteral identification is typically more difficult on the left compared with the right because of the possibility of inflammatory adhesions from previous diverticular disease. The fourth arm can be used to retract the sigmoid colon medially for easier retraction. (Fig. 1)



The ureter is dissected distally toward the ureterovesical junction (UVJ) maintaining adequate periureteral tissue to prevent ischemia to the distal ureter. The distal margin is cut using the cold scissors and is immediately sent for frozen section.

Back to Top | Article Outline


The posterior peritoneum is incised lateral to the medial umbilical ligament and carried toward the ipsilateral ureter. Areolar tissue is swept from lateral to medial to maintain adequate soft tissue margin and avoid injury to the iliac vessels. The endopelvic fascia is identified and incised (Fig. 2).



Back to Top | Article Outline


Once both spaces are developed on either side, the posterior peritoneum remaining between the two ureters is incised across the midline. In men, this incision is made just below the vas deferens, as they travel toward the midline. Blunt dissection in a sweeping motion is used to separate Denonvillier's fascia from the rectum (Fig. 3).



Back to Top | Article Outline


After the above spaces have been developed, the fourth robotic arm is used to apply anterior retraction to the bladder. The right and left arms are used to manipulate the perivesical tissue medially and laterally in order to identify the vascular pedicle. The endo GIA stapler is used to ligate the vascular pedicle including the superior vesicle artery.

Back to Top | Article Outline


The anterior attachments of the bladder are divided by incising the urachus and medial umbilical ligaments as cranial as possible in order to ensure an adequate soft tissue margin. The space of Retzius is entered and the bladder is dropped. The dorsal venous complex (DVC) is exposed. The insufflation pressure is increased to 20 cm and the DVC can either be incised using the hook cautery (if non-nerve-sparing is performed) or cold using the scissors (if nerve-sparing is performed). The DVC is oversewn using a barbed suture and insuflation pressure is returned to 15 cm. The urethra is exposed and the indwelling foley catheter is drawn out. A large clip is placed across the urethra to prevent antegrade tumor spillage. If a urethrectomy is performed a second clip may be placed distally for identification. The urethra is divided and the specimen is placed in an Endo Catch (Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA) bag.

Back to Top | Article Outline


With the development of surgical expertise, a growing interest in sexual and reproductive sparing radical techniques have been described. The procedure employs the same principle of exploring the spaces as described above for male cystectomy with slight variation. While developing the periureteral space the uterine artery is encountered crossing the ureter. These structures are left intact until all other landmarks are identified. The lateral pelvic space is developed similar to male radical cystectomy. It contains the round ligament traversing across from the deep inguinal ring to the uterus. The ligation of the pedicles is achieved by separating the peritoneum connecting the infundibulopelvic ligament with the internal iliac vessels. This ligament contains the ovarian vessels that travel anterior and lateral to the ipsilateral ureter. The ureter, uterine and vesical blood vessels are ligated.

The retrouterine space is developed to complete the posterior dissection of the uterus in the female cystectomy. This is achieved by incising the posterior peritoneum in the rectouterine pouch and blunt dissection to the posterior vaginal fornix. Manipulation of an intravaginal dilator helps identify the junction of posterior fornix with the cervical os. The pelvic plexus supplies the vagina and urethra and descends on the lateral vaginal wall, and therefore care must be taken to save this plexus for adequate sexual function. Development of the anterior vaginal space is recommended in order to preserve adequate length of anterior vaginal wall. Traction is applied on the uterus using the fourth arm and with careful dissection between the anterior vaginal and posterior bladder walls. The vagina is closed in a transverse fashion to prevent the creation of a narrow dysfunctional vagina. Preservation of anterior vaginal wall is based on oncological planning before surgery is planned.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Immediate and intermediate oncologic outcomes have been reported for RARC. University of North Carolina completed the first RCT's in robot-assisted urologic surgery. Nix et al.[10] in a small prospective, randomized trial demonstrated equivalent lymph node yield and decrease in estimated blood loss, analgesic requirement and return of bowel function. Meanwhile several other groups have initiated RCTs comparing open versus robot-assisted radical cystectomy. Controlled Trial of Open, Robotic, and Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy [11] cystectomy and Bladder cancer: Open vs Laparoscopic or robotic cystectomy [12] trials in UK and the University of Texas at San Antonio and Memorial Sloan Kettering trials in the USA [13] have been initiated and should help corroborate equal early clinical outcomes as seen by several single institution series and the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium (IRCC), a conglomerate of over 35 institutions from seven countries collecting standardized outcomes data.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Avoidance of soft tissue surgical margins forms the basic tenet of an oncologic procedure. IRCC reported an overall positive margin rate of 6.8% in 513 patients [14]. Age, higher pathologic stage and positive lymph nodes were found to be predictive of a soft tissue surgical margin (STSM). Styn et al.[4▪] compared case matched RARC to ORC and found no difference in positive STSM (2%) and final pathological outcomes. Pruthi et al.[15] reported no positive STSM in 100 RARC cases. Although higher STSM have been reported in pathologic T3 and greater stages from RARC series, alluding to absence of tactile feedback and early learning curve, there is an absence of early learning curve ORC data for appropriate comparison.

Nepple et al.[16] described early oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing RARC and open cystectomy by a single surgeon (n = 65). There was no difference found in pathologic stage, margin status and nodes count. At a median of 12 months follow-up, recurrence-free, disease-specific, and overall survival were similar between the two groups.

Back to Top | Article Outline


After the bladder is dissected completion of a thorough extended lymph node dissection is an essential component of this procedure. An advantage of performing the lymphadenectomy after complete bladder dissection is that it allows more freedom of movement within the pelvis. The fourth arm is routinely used to retract the sigmoid medially away from the floor of the dissection. This allows access to the proximal nodes. Equal number of surgeons prefers to perform lymphadenectomy prior to radical cystectomy with the goal of setting up the vascular pedicle control while lymphadenectomy is being performed.

Back to Top | Article Outline


It has been well established that a higher lymph node yield is diagnostic as well as therapeutic [17,18]. Data from the IRCC demonstrated mean lymph node yield of 19. Nix et al.[10] in their randomized trial showed a mean lymph node yield of 19 in the RARC group compared with 18 in the ORC. Davis et al.[19] reported outcomes of primary RARC lymphadenectomy followed by a second look open pelvic lymphadenectomy in 11 patients. The mean lymph node yield for the primary RARC was 43 (range 19–63) with only retrieving a mean lymph node yield of 4 (range 0–8) on open second look.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Increase in life span and late diagnosis (higher morbidity) and absence of standardized reporting of up to 3 months after open surgery have been at the center of attention regarding RARC and its outcomes. Shabsigh et al.[20] reported an overall, 90-day postoperative complication rate of 64% during open cystectomy comparable to the Roswell Park Series of 52% 90 days after surgery [21]. Meanwhile Yuh et al.[22▪▪] reported a higher complication rate of 80% by including any blood transfusion and significant high-grade Clavien complications (categorization of procedural intervention). Yu et al.[23▪▪] utilizing US nationwide Inpatient Sample data compared ORC versus RARC in population-based settings and found lower parental nutritional use, fewer inpatient complications and zero deaths in the RARC group as compared with 2.5% open mortality.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Urinary diversion is the only section of the procedure that has been performed with an open approach. Recently, urinary diversion has also been performed with robot-assistance.

Back to Top | Article Outline


A 12 cm segment of bowel is identified (15 cm proximal to the ileocecal valve) and a Keith needle silk suture is passed through the hypogastrium of the anterior abdominal wall. The stitch is passed through the distal end of the bowel segment and then brought back through the same location on the anterior abdominal wall. The stitch is not tied but kept in position with a surgical instrument. This allows raising and lowering of the bowel segment during the creation of the conduit.

The proximal segment of bowel is controlled using the fourth-arm. The hook cautery is used to incise the peritoneum of the bowel mesentery. Small mesenteric vessels are controlled using the bipolar cautery. Two mesenteric windows are created. It is important to keep appropriate orientation of the bowel to prevent narrowing of the base of the conduit (blood supply). The Endo GIA (Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA) stapler is used to divide the bowel. Bowel continuity is not established at this point but the incised ends of bowel are reapproximated using a silk suture in order to maintain appropriate orientation of the bowel for the anastomosis.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Using the hook cautery two enterotomies are made in the proximal end of the conduit. The ureter is incised and spatulated. The running anastomosis is performed using the Van-Velthoven technique using two monofilament sutures tied together. After half of the anastomosis is complete an enterotomy is made at the distal end of the ileal conduit. A laparoscopic suction tip is gently passed through the distal enterotomy to the ureteroileal anastomosis. A 90 cm single J stent is passed through the suction tip and into the ureter.

Once the stent is deployed, the metal suction tip is removed while keeping the stent in position with one of the robotic arms. The inner-wire of the stent should remain in place. To prevent accidental stent dislodgement, a suture is used to secure the stent 1 cm from the anastomosis to prevent accidental dislodgement. The guide wire is removed and the anastomosis is completed.

Back to Top | Article Outline


An additional 12 mm port is placed in the left lower quadrant. The port incision may be extended for specimen removal in men. The proximal and distal bowel ends are identified. An enterotomy is made in each bowel segment and raised toward the 12 mm port. The 60 mm Endo GIA (Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA) stapler is used to perform a side-to-side anastomosis ensuring appropriate alignment on the antimesenteric border. The Endo GIA (Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA) stapler is placed through the right assistant port for final closure of the bowel. The mesenteric window is closed using interrupted sutures.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Evolution of minimally invasive approach for bladder cancer patients should ideally include completion of intracorporeal urinary diversion. Guru et al.[5] demonstrated similar perioperative outcomes (conduit operative time, bowel complications) between patients undergoing extracorporeal and intracorporeal conduit (n = 26). Several other series of intracorporeal urinary diversion have shown acceptable early clinical outcomes with smaller series including diversion times (159 versus 120 min), inpatient narcotic requirement in morphine sulphate equivalents (57.6 versus 97.6) and immediate complication results. Single hospital series of 45 robot-assisted neobladders displayed significant improvement in overall operative times (517–417 min), complications (50–17%) during early experience [24,25]. Poch et al.[26] demonstrated that ICIC may be safely performed on patients of all BMI indices.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Prospective analysis after using the validated Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bladder Cancer (FACT-BL) questionnaire, before and after surgery revealed at 6 months, FACT-BL scores exceeded presurgical baseline [27]. Short-term health status based on Convalescence and Recovery Evaluation questionnaire found that patients who underwent RARC approached preoperative baseline levels within 90 days in all domains (pain, cognition, and activity domains) except gastrointestinal domains [28].

Back to Top | Article Outline


Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy and intracorporeal urinary diversion is an effective, lower morbidity alternative to open surgery.

Back to Top | Article Outline



Back to Top | Article Outline

Conflicts of interest

K.A.G. is a board member of Simulated Surgical Systems, LLC.

M.A.P., J.R. and J.N. have no conflicts of interest.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • ▪ of special interest
  • ▪▪ of outstanding interest

Additional references related to this topic can also be found in the Current World Literature section in this issue (p. 101).

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Menon M, Hemal AK, Tewari A, et al. Nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical cystoprostatectomy and urinary diversion. BJU Int 2003; 92:232–236.
2. Challacombe BJ, Bochner BH, Dasgupta P, et al. The role of laparoscopic and robotic cystectomy in the management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer with special emphasis on cancer control and complications. Eur Urol 2011; 60:767–775.
3. Chade DC, Laudone VP, Bochner BH, Parra RO. Oncological outcomes after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: open versus minimally invasive approaches. J Urol 2010; 183:862–869.
4▪. Styn NR, Montgomery JS, Wood DP, et al. Matched comparison of robotic-assisted and open radical cystectomy. Urology 2012; 79:1303–1309.

Fifty RARC and 100 ORC cases were compared using a 1 : 2 matched comparison. RARC was associated with increase operative times but decreased blood loss and transfusion rates. There was no difference in 30-day complication rates. Importantly, there was no difference in the short-term oncologic outcomes between the two groups. Mean lymph node yields were similar between the two groups 14.3 for RARC and 15.2 for ORC.

5. Guru K, Seixas-Mikelus SA, Hussain A, et al. Robot-assisted intracorporeal ileal conduit: Marionette technique and initial experience at Roswell Park Cancer Institute. Urology 2010; 76:866–871.
6. Rehman J, Sangalli MN, Guru K, et al. Total intracorporeal robot-assisted laparoscopic ileal conduit (Bricker) urinary diversion: technique and outcomes. Canadian J Urol 2011; 18:5548–5556.
7. Hayn MH, Hellenthal NJ, Seixas-Mikelus SA, et al. Is patient outcome compromised during the initial experience with robot-assisted radical cystectomy? Results of 164 consecutive cases. BJU Int 2011; 108:882–887.
8. Wolf JS Jr, Bennett CJ, Dmochowski RR, et al. Best practice policy statement on urologic surgery antimicrobial prophylaxis. J Urol 2008; 179:1379–1390.
9. Hayn MH, Agarwal PK, Guru KA, Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy in Male: Technique of Spaces. Robotics in Genitourinary Surgery. London: Springer; 2011.
10. Nix J, Smith A, Kurpad R, et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative and pathologic results. Eur Urol 2010; 57:196–201.
11. AF Ismail, O Elhage, P Rimington, et al. Initial experience with a Randomised Controlled trial of Open, Robotic and Laparoscopic (CORAL) radical cystectomy. BJU Int. BAUS Meeting 2010, abstract #129.
12. ISRCTN. London: Current Controlled Trials, c/o BioMed Central. 2008. Identifier ISRCTN 38528926. Bladder cancer: Open versus Laparoscopic or Robotic cystectomy. A study to determine the feasibility of randomisation to open versus minimal access cystectomy in patients with invasive bladder cancer. [Accessed 1 October 2012]
13. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). 2000 Feb 29 -. Identifier NCT01076387, Randomized Trial Comparing Robotic and Open Radical Cystectomy 2010. [Accessed 1 October 2012].
14. Hellenthal NJ, Hussain A, Andrews PE, et al. Surgical margin status after robot assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. J Urol 2010; 184:87–91.
15. Pruthi RS, Nielsen ME, Nix J, et al. Robotic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: surgical and pathological outcomes in 100 consecutive cases. The Journal of Urology 2010; 183:510–514.Epub 2009/12/17.
16. Nepple KG, Strope SA, Grubb RL, 3rd, Kibel AS. Early oncologic outcomes of robotic vs. open radical cystectomy for urothelial cancer. Urologic Oncol 2011 [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.06.009
17. Konety BR, Joslyn SA, O’Donnell MA. Extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy and its impact on outcome in patients diagnosed with bladder cancer: analysis of data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program data base. J Urol 2003; 169:946–950.
18. Kim SP, Karnes RJ. Standard or extended lymphadenectomy in radical cystectomy: what metric of surgical quality for lymph node dissections matters in improving patient outcomes? Eur Urol 2011; 60:953–954.
19. Davis JW, Gaston K, Anderson R, et al. Robot assisted extended pelvic lymphadenectomy at radical cystectomy: lymph node yield compared with second look open dissection. J Urol 2011; 185:79–83.
20. Shabsigh A, Korets R, Vora KC, et al. Defining early morbidity of radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer using a standardized reporting methodology. Eur Urol 2009; 55:164–174.
21. Hayn MH, Hellenthal NJ, Hussain A, et al. Defining morbidity of robot-assisted radical cystectomy using a standardized reporting methodology. Eur Urol 2011; 59:213–218.
22▪▪. Yuh BE, Nazmy M, Ruel NH, et al. Standardized Analysis of Frequency and Severity of Complications After Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy. Eur Urol 2012; 62:806–813.

This study evaluated the complication rate of the 224 patients undergoing RARC using standardized Clavien methodology. Eighty percent of patients had any complication 90 or less days after surgery. Thirty five percent of patients had a major complication 90 or less days after surgery. This study is important because it demonstrates the importance of appropriate and standardized classification systems (also seen in [17] and [18]) and the providing data for appropriate patient counseling and assessment of surgical success. Outcomes in this study are comparable to that of series.

23▪▪. Yu HY, Hevelone ND, Lipsitz SR, et al. Comparative analysis of outcomes and costs following open radical cystectomy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy: results from the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Eur Urol 2012; 61:1239–1244.

Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample this study compared 1444 ORC cases with 224 RARC cases. Patients who underwent RARC had fewer complications 49.1 versus 63.8% and fewer deaths. This study demonstrated equivalent hospital length of stay between the two groups. RARC was found to be significantly more costly than ORC by US$ 3 797.

24. Schumacher MC, Jonsson MN, Hosseini A, et al. Surgery-related complications of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion. Urology 2011; 77:871–876.
25. Jonsson MN, Adding LC, Hosseini A, et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion in patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Eur Urol 2011; 60:1066–1073.
26. Poch MA, Stegemann A, Chandrasekhar R, et al. Does body mass index impact the performance of robot-assisted intracorporeal ileal conduit? J Endourol Endourologic Soc 2012; 26:857–860.
27. Yuh B, Butt Z, Fazili A, et al. Short-term quality-of-life assessed after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a prospective analysis. BJU Int 2009; 103:800–804.
28. Stegemann A, Rehman S, Brewer K, et al. Short-term patient-reported quality of life after robot-assisted radical cystectomy using the Convalescence and Recovery Evaluation. Urology 2012; 79:1274–1279.

bladder cancer; lymphadenectomy; robot-assisted radical cystectomy; robotics; urinary diversion; urothelial cancer

© 2013 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.