Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Erratum

Erratum

Current Opinion in Urology: July 2008 - Volume 18 - Issue 4 - p 446
doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e328305079a
  • Free

The following typographical error was published in the review ‘Current controversies in the treatment of high-risk prostate cancer’ by Robert E. Mitchell and Sam S. Chang [1] which appeared on p 265 of Current Opinion in Urology, Volume 18, issue 3.

Under the heading ‘Neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment for locally advanced prostate cancer’ the sentence ‘They did not find significant differences in PSA relapse-free survival, recurrence-free survival, or freedom from hormonal treatment, but complications were more frequent in the radiotherapy group.’ should read ‘They did find significant differences in PSA relapse-free survival, recurrence-free survival, or freedom from hormonal treatment, but complications were more frequent in the radiotherapy group.’

Reference

1 Mitchell RE, Chang SS. Current controversies in the treatment of high-risk prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol 2008; 18:263–268.
© 2008 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.