Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

INNATE - ADAPTIVE IMMUNE INTERFACE IN ALLOGRAFT REJECTION AND SURVIVAL: Edited by Xian C. Li

Impact of the microbiota on solid organ transplant rejection

Sepulveda, Martin*; Pirozzolo, Isabella*; Alegre, Maria-Luisa

Author Information
Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation: December 2019 - Volume 24 - Issue 6 - p 679-686
doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000702
  • Free

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The microbiota, the communities of microorganisms that colonize mucosal and epithelial surfaces in contact with the outside world, lives in symbiosis with its host. Hosts become colonized at birth, with microbial diversity increasing in the first years of life [1]. Each individual carries their own microbial community structures, shaped by birth mode, diet, environmental exposures, host genetics and immune constraints [2]. In turn, the microbiota is essential for health. For instance, the gut microbiota synthesizes essential metabolites, such as vitamin K, breaks down otherwise indigestible dietary plant fibers, inactivates toxic substances, and prevents pathogen colonization. The skin microbiota helps prevent cutaneous infections and accelerates wound healing.

We will discuss four ways by which the intestinal and extraintestinal microbiota and transplantation intersect (Fig. 1). First, the microbiota modulates alloreactivity. Indeed, although the strength of the alloimmune response is primarily determined by the extent of genetic disparities between the host and donor, the microbiota also modifies this response, potentially enhancing or dampening alloimmunity. Systemic effects of gut microbiota and local effects dictated by the transplanted organ-specific microbiota both contribute to this effect, perhaps explaining in part why colonized organs like the lung have worse outcomes after transplantation than noncolonized organs like the heart or kidney. Second, the gut microbiota may also participate in the metabolism of immunosuppressive drugs and consequently may affect their dosing, or cause some of their side-effects. Third, because of its dynamic status and rapid response to environmental changes, the gut microbiota might become useful as a predictive biomarker, for instance for allograft outcome, responsiveness to immunosuppression or posttransplant complications. Finally, the microbiota might be harnessed therapeutically.

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1:
Potential intersections between the microbiota and transplantation. The microbiota may be modified by the pretransplant disease, the surgical injury, and the posttransplantation therapies, resulting in dysbiosis. The gut microbiota may metabolize immunosuppressive drugs causing interpersonal dosing variability or enabling drug side effects. The intestinal microbiota modulates the alloimmune response distally to the gut, at the priming phase, thus affecting outcome of both colonized and sterile grafts. The microbiota at colonized allografts may also tune the local alloimmune response, at the effector phase, further modifying outcome of colonized transplants. The gut microbiota may also become a useful biomarker to predict graft outcome, responsiveness to therapy, or to identify patients susceptible to specific drug side effects. Finally, the microbiota may be modified for therapeutic purposes by diet, exercise, probiotics, antimicrobials, or drugs that target bacterial pathways.
Box 1
Box 1:
no caption available

IMPACT OF THE MICROBIOTA ON THE IMMUNE SYSTEM

The hypothesis that the intestinal microbiota might modulate alloimmunity derives from observations outside the transplant field that the microbiota matures and shapes the immune system. For instance, colonization of germ-free mice with the bacterium Bacteroides fragilis, promoted lymphoid organogenesis and corrected immune deficits [3]. Along the same lines, mice treated with antibiotics and germ-free mice had a reduced number of lacteals, lymphatic-like structures that originate from each intestinal villus and help absorb dietary lipids, whereas conventionalization of germ-free mice restored lacteal maturation and integrity [4▪]. The intestinal microbiota also directs the differentiation of innate and adaptive immune cells in the gut and lamina propria. Bacterial species colonize specific niches in the gut, creating microenvironments and providing signals that dictate dendritic cell licensing to orchestrate highly specialized T-cell responses. For example, segmented-filamentous bacterium (SFB) attaches to the lining of the ileum and promoted T-cell-dependent IgA responses [5], Th17 [6,7] and Th1 [6] differentiation. On the other hand, intestinal Clostridial consortia [8,9] and B. fragilis[10] promoted the induction of T-regulatory cells (Tregs), whereas Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron drove both Th1 and Treg differentiation [11▪]. The gut microbiota can also modulate the immune system systemically, impacting immune responses distal to the gut. For example, Abt et al.[12] showed reduced antiviral responses in mice upon oral antibiotic treatment that affected the gut microbiota, resulting in impaired viral clearance and enhanced viral susceptibility. However, it should be noted that antibiotic treatment impacts not only gut communities but also microbiota at other compartments including the skin [13]. Colonization of germ-free mice with gut-tropic commensals that cannot colonize other compartments may more conclusively address whether gut commensals can have systemic immune effects. Indeed, compared with uncolonized mice, SFB mono-colonization of germ-free mice resulted in enhanced pathological score and proinflammatory T-cell induction in the brain in an experimental mouse model of autoimmune encephalomyelitis [14], and also in exacerbated joint thickening and auto-antibody production in a rheumatoid arthritis mouse model [15]. Outstanding questions remain as to how gut-resident bacteria can impact immune responses at locations distal to the gut. Possible mechanisms include production of microbial products or metabolites that circulate systemically, or induction of signaling in gut epithelial cells or intestinal immune cells that then either themselves travel systemically, or relay these signals to other cells. The intestinal microbiota's ability to modulate immunity in distal, sterile sites like the brain and joints suggests that the gut microbiota may affect transplantation by altering alloimmunity to nonintestinal allografts, whether colonized or sterile, as suggested by the ability of oral antibiotics to prolong survival of both skin and cardiac allografts in mice [13].

The extraintestinal microbiota also has mutualistic relationships with the immune system. In the skin, adaptive immunity modulates tissue homeostasis and ensures that microbes do not disseminate into draining lymph nodes [16]. Tolerance to commensal microbes in the skin is modulated in part by a large and diverse population of FoxP3+ Tregs, many of which are specific for microbial-derived antigens [17]. This Treg population is initially established during neonatal life when commensals colonizing body surfaces after birth enter developing hair follicles [18]. The presence of microbes on neonatal skin seems to preferentially affect Tregs over other T-cell types, as germ-free neonates generate fewer cutaneous Tregs than SPF mice but show no differences in CD4+ effector, CD8+, dendritic epidermal, or γδ T-cell counts [18]. This neonatal wave of Tregs appears to be important for maintaining commensal tolerance throughout adult life. For example, mice colonized with the common human skin commensal Staphylococcus epidermidis as adults and those colonized from birth both achieved a state of commensalism characterized by a lack of tissue inflammation and a persistence of the microbe on the skin. However, following a minor skin-abrasion challenge, adult-colonized mice managed local invasion by the microbe more poorly than neonatal-colonized animals, exhibiting increased tissue inflammation, a larger S. epidermidis-antigen-specific CD4+ Teff : Treg ratio in the skin-draining lymph nodes, and augmented neutrophil infiltration of the damage site [18]. In addition to modulating commensal tolerance, the skin microbiota also modifies tissue-specific response to injury. Microbial communities on the skin promoted cutaneous accumulation of IL-17A-producing CD8+ T cells at steady state through a process that depended on migratory dendritic cells and nonclassical H2-M3-mediated antigen presentation [19,20▪,21▪▪]. Furthermore, tissue-resident memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cells generated by homeostatic encounters with microbes like S. epidermidis or Candida albicans expressed paradoxical phenotypes characterized by simultaneous expression of Type 2 and Type 17 transcription factor mRNA [20▪]. These programs were differentially activated or suppressed in response to site-specific cues like tissue injury, allowing the organ to rapidly tune local immunity, including T-cell recruitment to the wound site [19,20▪]. Importantly, T cells with these paradoxical programs were localized to the skin and not observed in the lymph nodes or spleen [21▪▪], suggesting that constant, localized exposure to specific microbial communities modulates these dynamic phenotypes. Similarly, the lung microbiota has been associated with production of IL-17B and progression to pulmonary fibrosis in a bleomycin-induced fibrosis mouse model [22]. Together, these data support the hypothesis that the microbiota in transplanted colonized organs may also affect local alloimmunity and graft survival by interacting with local immune cells.

THE IMPACT OF THE MICROBIOTA ON ALLOIMMUNITY AND TRANSPLANT OUTCOME

The microbiota at various body sites changes after transplantation [23], consistent with the use of peri-operative and prophylactic antimicrobials. In addition, taxonomic changes in the microbiome have been associated with acute or chronic rejection [24–27]. As it is difficult to prove causality in humans, we used antibiotic-treated and germ-free mice to determine whether the microbiota causally modulates alloimmunity and graft outcome. Oral antibiotic pretreatment of donors and recipients prior to transplantation, or a germ-free status, both prolonged survival of minor and major mismatch skin grafts, and of MHC class II-mismatched heart allografts [13], and reduced chronic disease in minor mismatch lung allografts [28▪]. Conventionalization of germ-free mice with fecal microbiome transfer (FMT) from control colonized mice but not from antibiotic-treated mice restored accelerated rejection of minor mismatch skin grafts by germ-free mice [13]. This demonstrated sufficiency of the microbiota in accelerating transplant rejection, and that different microbial community structures can affect transplant outcome differently. Prolonged survival of the minor mismatch skin graft in antibiotic-treated and germ-free mice was because of reduced licensing of lymph node dendritic cells (LN DCs) that displayed diminished expression of genes involved in NF-κB and type I interferon (IFN) signaling, and had lower ability to prime donor-reactive T cells in the graft-draining lymph nodes [13]. Indeed, mice deficient in IFNαR displayed prolonged minor mismatched skin graft survival that was not further extended by antibiotic pretreatment.

These results demonstrate that certain community structures can augment alloimmunity and accelerate rejection whereas others are neutral (those remaining after antibiotic treatment). There have been other reports indicating that yet other communities can dampen transplant rejection, an observation that supports manipulating the microbiota as an adjunct therapy to improve transplant outcomes. For instance, Rey et al.[29▪] have shown that antibiotic treatment early in life, which prevents normal taxa acquisition, accelerated rejection of aortic allografts, suggesting that mice acquire protective bacteria after weaning. Consistent with some microbial communities being protective, we found that mice obtained from Jackson displayed longer survival of minor mismatch skin grafts than genetically similar mice obtained from Taconic Farms but colonized with different microbiota [30▪]. Interestingly, co-housing or FMT dominantly converted fast rejectors into slow rejectors, a phenomenon associated with the fecal presence of an Alistipes genus in slow rejectors [30▪]. Guo et al. [31▪] have also implicated the microbiota in the differences in acute and chronic rejection of minor mismatch lung allografts observed in mice purchased from different vendors. This outcome divergence was associated with different proportions of lung Tregs. Importantly, antibiotic pretreatment of the spontaneously tolerant mice reduced lung Tregs and restored the acute and chronic rejection phenotype, again suggesting protective microbiota. These two studies also emphasize the importance of the microbiota in determining experimental variability in transplantation, as described in other settings [32]. Microbiota protective for transplantation can also be induced therapeutically or through tolerogenic states like pregnancy. Indeed, Zhang et al. [33▪▪] demonstrated that FMT from untransplanted mice that had received high-dose tacrolimus improved full mismatch skin graft survival in recipients treated with a low-dose tacrolimus, suggesting the presence of protective microbes in high-dose tacrolimus fecal samples. Bromberg et al. [34▪▪] reported that FMT from pregnant mice improved survival of full mismatch heart allografts in animals treated with low-dose tacrolimus, which correlated with the presence of Bifidobacterium pseudolongum. Notably, the administration of this bacterial strain to transplant recipients was sufficient to reduce chronic cardiac allograft disease, associating with lymph node structure remodeling [34▪▪]. Thus, there may be a place for oral administration of probiotics to facilitate graft survival.

The impact of extraintestinal microbiota is also emerging. In humans, changes in lung microbiota have been associated with lung allograft outcomes, with restoration of the host microbiota in the transplanted lung correlating with better graft survival [25] and anabolic and catabolic remodeling of the transplanted lung being associated with distinct bacterial strains [35▪]. To address the impact of the graft microbiota on graft outcome, we used germ-free mice as hosts of sterile or mono-colonized skin grafts, where the gut was maintained sterile through the oral administration of nonabsorbable antibiotics. Donor cutaneous colonization with S. epidermidis was sufficient to accelerate skin graft rejection in the absence of intestinal colonization [36], demonstrating a definite causal role for the allograft's microbiota on transplant outcome. Surprisingly, skin S. epidermidis did not increase alloreactive T-cell priming in the skin graft-draining lymph nodes, but instead might augment the effector immune response in the graft itself, as the skin graft but not the lymph nodes expressed higher levels of inflammatory cytokine genes. This points to targeting the allograft's microbiota prior to transplantation as a potential strategy to improve graft survival. Together, these data suggest that both intestinal and graft microbiota may modulate alloreactivity and graft outcome, albeit by different mechanisms.

THE MICROBIOTA AND IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE DRUGS

Although treatment with antibiotics is clearly expected to affect microbiota composition, a recent study that screened over 1000 drugs with mammalian gene product targets reported that 24% of the tested drugs inhibited the growth of at least one bacterial strain [37▪]. Immunosuppressive drugs themselves have been found to drive some changes in microbial community structures [38,39▪▪], whereas cyclosporine A was reported to prevent posttransplant dysbiosis in rats transplanted with allogeneic livers [40▪]. Conversely, interpersonal microbiome variability has been associated with interpersonal differences in drug metabolism [41], affecting drug dosage. As proof of principle outside transplantation, Eggerthella lenta strains containing the gene for the reductase Cgr2 were found to inactivate the cardiac medication digoxin [42▪], such that individuals harboring such strains would need higher drug doses for equal activity. Whether specific bacterial strains metabolize immunosuppressive drugs is not known but fecal abundance of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii in renal transplant patients was associated with needing more tacrolimus within a month posttransplantation [43]. Whether F. prausnitzii itself metabolizes tacrolimus or whether its presence is a marker for other metabolizing communities remains to be determined, but the data suggest that inter-patient and intra-patient dosing variability could be ascribed to cross-sectional or longitudinal differences in microbiota composition, respectively.

The microbiota may also cause drug side effects. This has been well demonstrated with irinotecan, an anticancer chemotherapy drug. This drug is degraded systemically into inactive metabolites excreted in the gut. People harboring intestinal bacteria expressing β-glucuronidases can reactivate these metabolites that then cause severe toxic diarrhea [44]. Drugs that inhibit bacterial β-glucuronidase prevent gut reactivation of irinotecan metabolites and diarrhea in mice, demonstrating beneficial effects of targeting biochemical pathways in commensal rather than mammalian cells [44]. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an immunosuppressant commonly prescribed to transplant patients that can also cause diarrhea. In mice, antibiotics prevented and reversed MMF's gastrointestinal toxicity and a germ-free status prevented it, suggesting its dependence on the microbiota [39▪▪]. Whether other transplant drug side effects are also microbiota-dependent, and by what mechanisms, remain to be studied.

THE MICROBIOTA AS A BIOMARKER OF TRANSPLANT OUTCOME OR RESPONSIVENESS TO THERAPY

Another active area of investigation is whether the microbiota might be used as biomarker of transplant outcome. In a cross-sectional study, the ratio of firmicutes : proteobacteria was found to be lower in intestinal transplant recipients undergoing acute rejection than in nonrejectors [24] and changes in urinary microbiota correlated with signs of chronic rejection in kidney transplant recipients [45]. However, inter-personal variations in microbiota composition from either rectal, oral or urinary samples are so wide [23] that analysis of longitudinal changes in each patient might better predict danger to the allograft or susceptibility to immunosuppression weaning.

As mentioned above, assessing the relative abundance of F. prausnitzii might also help choose the appropriate dose of tacrolimus [43]. Similarly, in the cancer field, the fecal microbiota composition in metastatic cancer patients prior to initiation of checkpoint blockade immunotherapy was recently shown to be predictive of subsequent responsiveness to therapy [46▪▪–48▪▪]. Importantly, antitumor immunity and susceptibility to anti-PDL1 therapy was transferable into melanoma-bearing germ-free mice by FMT from responder versus nonresponder patient samples [46▪▪], showing not only sufficiency of microbiota from responders to transfer this phenotype but also the conserved immune impact from human to mouse. Similar experiments could be performed in transplantation.

THE MICROBIOTA AS IMMUNE-MODULATING THERAPY

If shifts in microbiota can cause immune phenotypes, it makes sense to develop strategies to control microbial community structures through dietary interventions, antibiotics or probiotics. For instance, gut bacteria promoted by high-fiber diet alleviated type 2 diabetes [49▪]. In experimental transplantation, diets known to alter the microbiota, such as high-salt and high-fat diet accelerated graft rejection [50–52] and hyperlipidemia prevented tolerance induction [53]. As another lifestyle intervention, exercise, which is also known to alter the microbiota [54▪], prolonged skin graft survival in mice [55]. Causality of the microbial changes induced by diet or exercise on allograft outcome has not been established.

Although use of antibiotics is probably too crude at the moment to reliably shape the microbiota and also risks promoting antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains, there may be a place for narrow spectrum antibiotics if specific bacterial strains are proven to be dominantly pro-rejection. Bacterial strain-specific-targeting viral phages can also be developed as a pointed intervention, and commercial phages that target Listeria and Salmonella are already Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved. As mentioned above, strategies that target bacterial enzymes can also be considered, as are being tested to eliminate the intestinal toxicity or irinotecan [44].

FMT is now a well accepted strategy to treat Clostridium difficile-driven diarrhea [56], and third party FMT appears safe following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) to maintain intestinal microbial diversity [57▪], the loss of which is associated with bacterial domination and sepsis [58]. However, selection criteria for donors of FMT need to be refined as transfer of pathogens asymptomatically associated with the donor can be life-threatening in the recipient. In solid organ transplantation, one could consider autologous FMT from pretransplantation banking, as currently tested in clinical trials post-HSCT (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03061097). Alternatively, administration of clinical grade probiotics is attractive, but engraftment in recipients can be variable [59]. Interestingly, it might be possible to engineer probiotics to engraft better, as shown in a recent report in which transfer of a cluster of genes allowing utilization of porphyran, a marine polysaccharide not utilized by most bacterial strains, in conjunction to porphyran dietary supplementation, enabled titrated control of probiotic engraftment across hosts [60▪▪]. B. pseudolongum is the only commensal so far whose administration was sufficient to improve transplant outcome experimentally [34▪▪]. Whether this or other strains have similar effects in humans is important to pursue. In the cancer field, other strains of Bifidobacterium improved antitumor immunity and responsiveness to checkpoint blockade therapy in mice [61] and are already in clinical trials in metastatic cancer patients (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03595683 and NCT03775850), supporting the potential for translation.

CONCLUSION

The impact of the microbiota in transplantation is only starting to be appreciated. Much more work needs to be done to identify the exact mechanisms by which the microbiota modulates alloimmunity, the specific microbial strains or community structures that participate in this process, the interaction between the microbiota and immunosuppression, and what constitutes a healthy microbiota for transplant patients. Additionally, most work has focused on the role of bacteria. Studying the effects of resident fungi and viruses that are also part of the microbiota is an entirely open field, and changes posttransplantation are starting to be described in patients [62–65].

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by NIH grant R01 AI115716 to M.L.A.

Financial support and sponsorship

None.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES AND RECOMMENDED READING

Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • ▪ of special interest
  • ▪▪ of outstanding interest

REFERENCES

1. Stewart CJ, Ajami NJ, O’Brien JL, et al. Temporal development of the gut microbiome in early childhood from the TEDDY study. Nature 2018; 562:583–588.
2. Rothschild D, Weissbrod O, Barkan E, et al. Environment dominates over host genetics in shaping human gut microbiota. Nature 2018; 555:210–215.
3. Mazmanian SK, Liu CH, Tzianabos AO, et al. An immunomodulatory molecule of symbiotic bacteria directs maturation of the host immune system. Cell 2005; 122:107–118.
4▪. Suh SH, Choe K, Hong SP, et al. Gut microbiota regulates lacteal integrity by inducing VEGF-C in intestinal villus macrophages. EMBO Rep 2019; 20:pii: e46927.

Study showing that antibiotic treatment resulted in lacteal regression in adult mice and that germ-free mice also exhibited defects, which upon conventionalization were normalized, suggesting that the microbiota is important for lacteal integrity.

5. Bunker JJ, Flynn TM, Koval JC, et al. Innate and adaptive humoral responses coat distinct commensal bacteria with immunoglobulin A. Immunity 2015; 43:541–553.
6. Gaboriau-Routhiau V, Rakotobe S, Lecuyer E, et al. The key role of segmented filamentous bacteria in the coordinated maturation of gut helper T cell responses. Immunity 2009; 31:677–689.
7. Ivanov II, Atarashi K, Manel N, et al. Induction of intestinal Th17 cells by segmented filamentous bacteria. Cell 2009; 139:485–498.
8. Atarashi K, Tanoue T, Oshima K, et al. Treg induction by a rationally selected mixture of Clostridia strains from the human microbiota. Nature 2013; 500:232–236.
9. Atarashi K, Tanoue T, Shima T, et al. Induction of colonic regulatory T cells by indigenous Clostridium species. Science 2011; 331:337–341.
10. Shen Y, Giardino Torchia ML, Lawson GW, et al. Outer membrane vesicles of a human commensal mediate immune regulation and disease protection. Cell Host Microbe 2012; 12:509–520.
11▪. Wegorzewska MM, Glowacki RWP, Hsieh SA, et al. Diet modulates colonic T cell responses by regulating the expression of a Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron antigen. Sci Immunol 2019; 4:pii: 4/32/eaau9079.

Adoptive transfer of B. theta-specific T cells resulted in differentiation of both Th1 and Treg cells, and depletion of Treg cells resulted in colitis in a mouse model, showing that B. theta can drive differentiation of Tregs that self-regulate T-effector cell to prevent disease.

12. Abt MC, Osborne LC, Monticelli LA, et al. Commensal bacteria calibrate the activation threshold of innate antiviral immunity. Immunity 2012; 37:158–170.
13. Lei YM, Chen L, Wang Y, et al. The composition of the microbiota modulates allograft rejection. J Clin Invest 2016; 126:2736–2744.
14. Lee YK, Menezes JS, Umesaki Y, et al. Proinflammatory T-cell responses to gut microbiota promote experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011; 108 (Suppl 1):4615–4622.
15. Wu HJ, Ivanov II, Darce J, et al. Gut-residing segmented filamentous bacteria drive autoimmune arthritis via T helper 17 cells. Immunity 2010; 32:815–827.
16. Belkaid Y, Tamoutounour S. The influence of skin microorganisms on cutaneous immunity. Nat Rev Immunol 2016; 16:353–366.
17. Scharschmidt TC, Vasquez KS, Pauli ML, et al. Commensal microbes and hair follicle morphogenesis coordinately drive Treg migration into neonatal skin. Cell Host Microbe 2017; 21:467.e5–477.e5.
18. Scharschmidt TC, Vasquez KS, Truong HA, et al. A wave of regulatory T cells into neonatal skin mediates tolerance to commensal microbes. Immunity 2015; 43:1011–1021.
19. Naik S, Bouladoux N, Linehan JL, et al. Commensal-dendritic-cell interaction specifies a unique protective skin immune signature. Nature 2015; 520:104–108.
20▪. Linehan JL, Harrison OJ, Han SJ, et al. Nonclassical immunity controls microbiota impact on skin immunity and tissue repair. Cell 2018; 172:784.e8–796.e8.

Demonstrates that S. epidermidis enhances wound healing in the skin by inducing CD8+ T-cell infiltration in an H2-M3-dependent manner.

21▪▪. Harrison OJ, Linehan JL, Shih HY, et al. Commensal-specific T cell plasticity promotes rapid tissue adaptation to injury. Science 2019; 363: pii: e.aat6280.

Shows that commensal bacteria in the skin generate tissue-resident T cells poised with paradoxical transcriptional programs that can be rapidly translated or suppressed in response to environmental cues.

22. Yang D, Chen X, Wang J, et al. Dysregulated lung commensal bacteria drive interleukin-17B production to promote pulmonary fibrosis through their outer membrane vesicles. Immunity 2019; 50:692.e7–706.e7.
23. Fricke WF, Maddox C, Song Y, et al. Human microbiota characterization in the course of renal transplantation. Am J Transplant 2013; 26:12588.
24. Oh PL, Martinez I, Sun Y, et al. Characterization of the ileal microbiota in rejecting and nonrejecting recipients of small bowel transplants. Am J Transplant 2012; 12:753–762.
25. Willner DL, Hugenholtz P, Yerkovich ST, et al. Reestablishment of recipient-associated microbiota in the lung allograft is linked to reduced risk of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 187:640–647.
26. Weigt SS, Copeland CA, Derhovanessian A, et al. Colonization with small conidia Aspergillus species is associated with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome: a two-center validation study. Am J Transplant 2013; 13:919–927.
27. Wu JF, Muthusamy A, Al-Ghalith GA, et al. Urinary microbiome associated with chronic allograft dysfunction in kidney transplant recipients. Clin Transplant 2018; 32:e13436.
28▪. Wu Q, Turturice B, Wagner S, et al. The microbiota can impact chronic murine lung allograft rejection. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2018; 60:131–134.

Antibiotic-treatment results in lower acute rejection and fibrosis score in a minor-mismatched lung transplant model.

29▪. Rey K, Manku S, Enns W, et al. Disruption of the gut microbiota with antibiotics exacerbates acute vascular rejection. Transplantation 2018; 102:1085–1095.

This study shows that disruption of the microbiota early in life can exacerbate the alloimmune responses that cause acute vascular rejection.

30▪. McIntosh CM, Chen L, Shaiber A, et al. Gut microbes contribute to variation in solid organ transplant outcomes in mice. Microbiome 2018; 6:96.

This study shows that the distinct microbiota of genetically similar mice can contribute to distinct graft outcomes and alludes to the therapeutic potential of specific bacteria to improve graft outcomes.

31▪. Guo Y, Wang Q, Li D, et al. Vendor-specific microbiome controls both acute and chronic murine lung allograft rejection by altering CD4(+) Foxp3(+) regulatory T cell levels. Am J Transplant 2019; 6: doi: 10.1111/ajt.15523 [Epub ahead of print].

Another study showing that inter-individual microbial differences can control the presence or absence of acute and chronic rejection in a minor-mismatched lung transplant model, correlating with alterations in the Treg : T effector cell ratio.

32. Alegre ML. Mouse microbiomes: overlooked culprits of experimental variability. Genome Biol 2019; 20:108.
33▪▪. Zhang Z, Liu L, Tang H, et al. Immunosuppressive effect of the gut microbiome altered by high-dose tacrolimus in mice. Am J Transplant 2018; 18:1646–1656.

This study demonstrated that skin graft survival was improved by treating transplanted mice with FMT from untransplanted mice treated with high-dose tacrolimus.

34▪▪. Bromberg JS, Hittle L, Xiong Y, et al. Gut microbiota-dependent modulation of innate immunity and lymph node remodeling affects cardiac allograft outcomes. JCI Insight 2018; 3:121045.

Another study showing synergy between protective microbiota and immunosuppression and the first study to demonstrate sufficiency of select commensal strain therapeutic administration for ameliorating signs of chronic rejection.

35▪. Mouraux S, Bernasconi E, Pattaroni C, et al. SysCLAD Consortium. Airway microbiota signals anabolic and catabolic remodeling in the transplanted lung. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2018; 141:718.e7–729.e7.

In a human lung transplant cohort, analysis of the microbial composition of bronchoalveolar lavage reported specific microbiota members that correlated with catabolic and anabolic remodeling activities in the grafts.

36. Lei YM, Sepulveda M, Chen L, et al. Skin-restricted commensal colonization accelerates skin graft rejection. JCI Insight 2019; 16: pii: 127569.
37▪. Maier L, Pruteanu M, Kuhn M, et al. Extensive impact of nonantibiotic drugs on human gut bacteria. Nature 2018; 555:623–628.

Drug screen that examines effects of drugs with human gene product targets on microbial communities in vitro.

38. Tourret J, Willing BP, Dion S, et al. Immunosuppressive treatment alters secretion of ileal antimicrobial peptides and gut microbiota, and favors subsequent colonization by uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Transplantation 2017; 101:74–82.
39▪▪. Flannigan KL, Taylor MR, Pereira SK, et al. An intact microbiota is required for the gastrointestinal toxicity of the immunosuppressant mycophenolate mofetil. J Heart Lung Transplant 2018; 37:1047–1059.

This study shows that antibiotics or a germ-free status prevent the intestinal toxicity of MMF in mice.

40▪. Jia J, Tian X, Jiang J, et al. Structural shifts in the intestinal microbiota of rats treated with cyclosporine A after orthotropic liver transplantation. Front Med 2019; 24:018–0675.

Cyclosporin A treatment ameliorated hepatic graft injury and also restored the gut microbiota following liver transplantation in a rat model.

41. Zimmermann M, Zimmermann-Kogadeeva M, Wegmann R, et al. Mapping human microbiome drug metabolism by gut bacteria and their genes. Nature 2019; 570:462–467.
42▪. Koppel N, Bisanz JE, Pandelia ME, et al. Discovery and characterization of a prevalent human gut bacterial enzyme sufficient for the inactivation of a family of plant toxins. Elife 2018; 7:33953.

Identifies a cardiac glycoside reductase (Cgr2) in one strain of intestinal bacteria and shows that this enzyme, prevalent in many human microbiomes, inactivates a plant-derived cardiac medication.

43. Lee JR, Muthukumar T, Dadhania D, et al. Gut microbiota and tacrolimus dosing in kidney transplantation. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0122399.
44. Chamseddine AN, Ducreux M, Armand JP, et al. Intestinal bacterial beta-glucuronidase as a possible predictive biomarker of irinotecan-induced diarrhea severity. Pharmacol Ther 2019; 199:1–15.
45. Modena BD, Milam R, Harrison F, et al. Changes in urinary microbiome populations correlate in kidney transplants with interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy documented in early surveillance biopsies. Am J Transplant 2017; 17:712–723.
46▪▪. Matson V, Fessler J, Bao R, et al. The commensal microbiome is associated with anti-PD-1 efficacy in metastatic melanoma patients. Science 2018; 359:104–108.

Along with the two companion articles, the first reports that the fecal microbiome prior to immunotherapy can predict responsiveness to checkpoint blockade, and demonstrating reconstitution of the responder versus nonresponder phenotype by conventionalization of melanoma-carrying germ-free mice with FMT from human donors.

47▪▪. Routy B, Le Chatelier E, Derosa L, et al. Gut microbiome influences efficacy of PD-1-based immunotherapy against epithelial tumors. Science 2018; 359:91–97.

Along with the two companion articles, identifies the fecal microbiome as a predictive biomarker of susceptibility to checkpoint blockade in cancer patients.

48▪▪. Gopalakrishnan V, Spencer CN, Nezi L, et al. Gut microbiome modulates response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in melanoma patients. Science 2018; 359:97–103.

Along with the two companion articles, identifies the fecal microbiome as a predictive biomarker of susceptibility to checkpoint blockade in cancer patients.

49▪. Zhao L, Zhang F, Ding X, et al. Gut bacteria selectively promoted by dietary fibers alleviate type 2 diabetes. Science 2018; 359:1151–1156.

Isoenergetic diets in a clinical study of patients with type 2 diabetes showed that dietary fibers that enrich for SCFA-producing bacteria improved disease, compared with control diet.

50. Molinero LL, Yin D, Lei YM, et al. High-fat diet-induced obesity enhances allograft rejection. Transplantation 2016; 100:1015–1021.
51. Yuan J, Bagley J, Iacomini J. Hyperlipidemia promotes anti-donor Th17 responses that accelerate allograft rejection. Am J Transplant 2015; 15:2336–2345.
52. Safa K, Ohori S, Borges TJ, et al. Salt accelerates allograft rejection through serum- and glucocorticoid-regulated kinase-1-dependent inhibition of regulatory T cells. J Am Soc Nephrol 2015; 26:2341–2347.
53. Bagley J, Yuan J, Chandrakar A, et al. Hyperlipidemia alters regulatory T cell function and promotes resistance to tolerance induction through costimulatory molecule blockade. Am J Transplant 2015; 15:2324–2335.
54▪. Scheiman J, Luber JM, Chavkin TA, et al. Meta-omics analysis of elite athletes identifies a performance-enhancing microbe that functions via lactate metabolism. Nat Med 2019; 25:1104–1109.

Links presence of a single bacterial genus (Veillonella) with increased endurance exercise performance caused by better lactate-to-propionate metabolism.

55. Rael VE, Chen L, McIntosh CM, et al. Exercise increases skin graft resistance to rejection. Am J Transplant 2019; 19:15266.
56. van Nood E, Vrieze A, Nieuwdorp M, et al. Duodenal infusion of donor feces for recurrent Clostridium difficile. N Engl J Med 2013; 368:407–415.
57▪. DeFilipp Z, Peled JU, Li S, et al. Third-party fecal microbiota transplantation following allo-HCT reconstitutes microbiome diversity. Blood Adv 2018; 2:745–753.

Clinical study showing that third-party FMT after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation appears to safely expand recipient microbial diversity.

58. Taur Y, Xavier JB, Lipuma L, et al. Intestinal domination and the risk of bacteremia in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Clin Infect Dis 2012; 55:905–914.
59. Zmora N, Zilberman-Schapira G, Suez J, et al. Personalized gut mucosal colonization resistance to empiric probiotics is associated with unique host and microbiome features. Cell 2018; 174:1388.e21–1405.e21.
60▪▪. Shepherd ES, DeLoache WC, Pruss KM, et al. An exclusive metabolic niche enables strain engraftment in the gut microbiota. Nature 2018; 557:434–438.

Administration of porphyran helps create a metabolic niche that enables a bacterial strain that utilizes it to stably engraft in the intestine.

61. Sivan A, Corrales L, Hubert N, et al. Commensal Bifidobacterium promotes antitumor immunity and facilitates anti-PD-L1 efficacy. Science 2015; 350:1084–1089.
62. Sigdel TK, Mercer N, Nandoe S, et al. Urinary virome perturbations in kidney transplantation. Front Med (Lausanne) 2018; 5:72.
63. Abbas AA, Diamond JM, Chehoud C, et al. The perioperative lung transplant virome: torque teno viruses are elevated in donor lungs and show divergent dynamics in primary graft dysfunction. Am J Transplant 2017; 17:1313–1324.
64. Young JC, Chehoud C, Bittinger K, et al. Viral metagenomics reveal blooms of anelloviruses in the respiratory tract of lung transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 2015; 15:200–209.
65. Rani A, Ranjan R, McGee HS, et al. A diverse virome in kidney transplant patients contains multiple viral subtypes with distinct polymorphisms. Sci Rep 2016; 6:3332710.1038/srep33327.

* Martin Sepulveda and Isabella Pirozzolo contributed equally to this review.

Keywords:

commensals; microbiota; rejection; transplantation

Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.