Purpose of review
‘Global transplant commercialism
’ (practices and policies involving international trade in organs from living vendors, e.g., ‘transplant tourism
’) is currently subjected to unprecedented criticism. In parallel, the debate around ‘local transplant commercialism
’ (practices and policies that confine trade in organs from living vendors to national markets or economic unions) is heating up. In an attempt to assess the potential outcomes of these trends, this article reviews and discusses some sociological and ethical issues, ending with a proposal for a reinvigorated anticommercialist strategy.
The current international campaign against global transplant commercialism
is conducted by an ad hoc alliance between strange bedfellows, proponents of local transplant commercialism
on the one hand and opponents of any transplant commercialism
on the other. Disparities in the rigor of the respective ethical discourses, the expanding list of precedents of legitimized commerce in the human body, and the political economy of transplantation, all suggest that the former have the upper hand.
Recent achievements in the struggle against international organ trafficking
may not herald the abolition of transplant commercialism
but rather presage its reconfiguration in deglobalized forms. In light of such a prospect, those who wish to prevent the pervasive commodification
of the human body from entering the gates of transplant medicine should consider devising a new, perhaps more radical, strategy.