Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Mechanisms of REM sleep in health and disease

Fraigne, Jimmy J.a; Grace, Kevin P.b,c; Horner, Richard L.b,c; Peever, Johna,b

Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine: November 2014 - Volume 20 - Issue 6 - p 527–532
doi: 10.1097/MCP.0000000000000103
SLEEP AND RESPIRATORY NEUROBIOLOGY: Edited by Lee K. Brown and Adrian Williams
Free

Purpose of review Our understanding of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep and how it is generated remains a topic of debate. Understanding REM sleep mechanisms is important because several sleep disorders result from disturbances in the neural circuits that control REM sleep and its characteristics. This review highlights recent work concerning how the central nervous system regulates REM sleep, and how the make up and breakdown of these REM sleep-generating circuits contribute to narcolepsy, REM sleep behaviour disorder and sleep apnea.

Recent findings A complex interaction between brainstem REM sleep core circuits and forebrain and hypothalamic structures is necessary to generate REM sleep. Cholinergic activation and GABAergic inhibition trigger the activation of subcoeruleus neurons, which form the core of the REM sleep circuit.

Summary Untimely activation of REM sleep circuits leads to cataplexy – involuntary muscle weakness or paralysis – a major symptom of narcolepsy. Degeneration of the REM circuit is associated with excessive muscle activation in REM sleep behaviour disorder. Inappropriate arousal from sleep during obstructive sleep apnea repeatedly disturbs the activity of sleep circuits, particularly the REM sleep circuit.

aDepartments of Cell and Systems Biology

bPhysiology

cMedicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Correspondence to John Peever, Departments of Cell and Systems Biology and Physiology, University of Toronto, 25 Harbord St, Toronto, ON M5S 3G5, Canada. Tel: +1 416 946 7236; e-mail: John.peever@utoronto.ca

Back to Top | Article Outline

INTRODUCTION

Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep is a fundamental state of consciousness of the mammalian brain. Initially, sleep was assumed to be a passive process; however, electrophysiological recording of neural activity in the sleeping brain revealed its dual nature [1,2]. Contrary to non-REM sleep, REM sleep is marked by wake-like brain activity of low-voltage fast waves occurring in combination with temporary muscle paralysis and vivid dreaming. REM sleep is additionally characterized by phasic phenomena, including muscle twitching and REMs. Moreover, cardiorespiratory control and autonomic tone typically exhibit significant variability in REM sleep.

All these changes accompanying REM sleep are well tolerated by normal individuals; however, these changes can give rise to pathological states and/or exacerbate existing disease in vulnerable clinical populations, for example, sleep apnea [3]. It is important to note that these physiological and pathophysiological characteristics are ultimately the product of interactions between REM sleep control circuitry and other parts of the nervous system. Hence, understanding the complex neural circuit that generates REM sleep will help clarify the mechanisms underlying REM sleep-associated pathologies. The following review aims to summarize the recent advances in our understanding of REM sleep control mechanisms and the relationships between these circuits and three major disease states.

Box 1

Box 1

Back to Top | Article Outline

THE RAPID EYE MOVEMENT SLEEP CORE COMPRISES A GABAERGIC/GLUTAMATERGIC CIRCUIT

Lesion, pharmacology and electrical stimulation studies localized the main neural network required for generating REM sleep within the brainstem. More recent studies have identified that this network receives influences from hypothalamic and forebrain structures [4,5]. The center of this REM sleep-generating circuit lies ventral to the locus coeruleus and medial to the trigeminal motor nucleus – the subcoeruleus (SubC) nucleus [6–8]. The neurons of this nucleus are REM active, meaning that they are most active during REM sleep [6,7,9–11]. The majority of these cells synthesize glutamate [12]. Their drug-induced stimulation triggers motor atonia [6–13], whereas bilateral lesions result in loss of REM sleep paralysis (atonia) and/or reduced REM sleep amounts [6–7]. SubC cells induce REM atonia by recruiting inhibitory circuits localized in the ventromedial medulla and spinal cord, which in turn trigger atonia by directly inhibiting skeletal motoneurons [7,13–16].

At the level of the motoneuron, muscle paralysis in REM sleep is caused by both gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glycine inhibition [17–19]. Receptor pharmacology studies show that simultaneously antagonizing GABAA/GABAB/glycine receptors on motoneurons are necessary to prevent REM sleep atonia [18,19]. These data indicate that both GABA and glycine-mediated inhibition of motoneurons underlie REM sleep atonia. However, there is critical involvement of acetylcholine (Ach) for suppressing respiratory motoneurons (i.e., hypoglossal) and genioglossus motor activity during REM sleep (see below, Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Mechanisms and Treatment).

In addition to the activation of the SubC neurons, another group of GABA-containing neurons, the dorsal paragigantocellular reticular nucleus (DPGi), may contribute to the generation of REM sleep by inhibiting wake-promoting areas [20]. These neurons are active during REM sleep and are hypothesized to inhibit the locus coeruleus, dorsal raphe and part of the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (vlPAG) [21]. Pharmacological and electrical activation of the DPGi promotes REM sleep [22–24].

The vlPAG region contains GABAergic neurons that are divided into two subpopulations: REM-active and REM-inhibiting neurons. REM-active neurons of this region project to wake-promoting neurons of the locus coeruleus and dorsal raphe and are hypothesized to inhibit them during REM sleep [20,21,25], whereas REM-inhibiting neurons of the vlPAG project to the SubC region and may silence the core of the REM sleep-generating circuit [7,26,27]. Lesions and pharmacologic inhibition of these vlPAG neurons lead to a significant increase in REM sleep duration [27,28]. The concerted interaction between the SubC, vlPAG and DPGi is responsible for the generation of REM sleep and its characteristics.

Finally, hypothalamic and forebrain structures contribute to REM sleep control as well. Optogenetic activation of melanin-concentrating hormone (MCH) neurons shortens sleep onset and increases the duration of REM sleep [29▪▪,30▪▪]. These neurons promote REM sleep by inactivating wake-promoting histaminergic neurons of the tuberomammillary nucleus and noradrenergic cells of the locus coeruleus, through a release of GABA [29▪▪,30▪▪]. Similarly, neurons of the extended ventrolateral preoptic area are REM active [7] and send GABAergic projection to several brainstem regions, including the REM sleep-inhibiting region of the vlPAG, thereby releasing the SubC region from its inactivated state [31].

Back to Top | Article Outline

CHOLINERGIC INVOLVEMENT IN RAPID EYE MOVEMENT SLEEP GENERATION

Since the earlier postulated reciprocal interaction hypothesis – in which cholinergic REM-active neurons interact with monoaminergic wake-active neurons to generate REM sleep [32] – neurons containing Ach have been viewed at the center of REM sleep control. However, the extent of the contributions made by Ach is still debated [21].

One model posits that the critical event responsible for initiating REM sleep is the cholinergic activation of the SubC neurons. Indeed, several studies demonstrate the excitatory actions of Ach on SubC neurons. Most recently, it was shown that Ach activates spinally projecting SubC neurons [33▪▪], suggesting a role for cholinergic inputs in the SubC-mediated generation of REM sleep motor atonia. This cholinergic activation is mediated by both postsynaptic excitation and presynaptic enhancement of glutamate release. Importantly, these results demonstrate that Ach acts to both directly activate the core of the REM sleep circuitry and modulate the glutamatergic drives that underlie REM sleep control [34].

Previous studies investigating cholinergic involvement in REM sleep generation focused on the effects of exogenous Ach on the SubC region and were not designed to determine how endogenous cholinergic neurotransmission impacts REM sleep generation. If cholinergic neurotransmission does contribute to REM sleep generation, one would expect blockade of SubC Ach receptors to suppress REM sleep. However, findings from a recent study show that REM sleep is not reduced when SubC cholinergic receptors are blocked [35]. Although the results indicate that cholinergic inputs into SubC neurons are not required to initiate transitions into REM sleep, the study does show that cholinergic input functions to reinforce transitions once initiated. This is evident by increases in non-REM-to-REM sleep transition duration and failure rate during cholinergic receptor blockade. Moreover, the results indicate that cholinergic neuron activation is gated by SubC activity, supporting a mutually excitatory interaction between cholinergic and glutamatergic circuits responsible for REM sleep. This kind of positive feedback increases the reliability of neural systems to switch between states of consciousness in a rapidly inducible manner [36].

Back to Top | Article Outline

CATAPLEXY: INTRUSION OF RAPID EYE MOVEMENT SLEEP INTO WAKEFULNESS

Approximately, 3 million people worldwide suffer from the sleep disorder narcolepsy [37]. Cataplexy is a defining symptom of this disorder and is the involuntary loss of skeletal muscle tone (i.e., motor atonia) during wakefulness. This loss of muscle tone can range from mild impairment (e.g., drooping of the face) to total body paralysis lasting seconds to minutes [38▪]. Autoimmune-induced loss of hypocretin/orexin neurons or mutations in the genes encoding orexin appears to cause human narcolepsy [39–45]. However, the precise neural mechanisms that trigger cataplexy are unclear.

It has been hypothesized that cataplexy results from the intrusion of REM sleep paralysis into wakefulness [37,46,47]. Neuroimaging studies of patients with narcolepsy and electrophysiological recordings from isolated neurons in narcoleptic dogs show that the brainstem circuitry involved in REM sleep might have similar activity during both REM sleep and cataplexy [48,49]. Some patients with narcolepsy report hypnagogic hallucinations during cataplexic attacks and some enter into REM sleep [50].

A cataplectic attack is generally triggered by strong positive emotions, such as excited laughter or surprise [51]. Orexin neurons are active in the response to strong emotions; therefore, loss of orexin neurons in narcoleptic patients hypothetically destabilizes the motor control system within the brainstem such that positive emotions trigger motor paralysis [52,53].

The amygdala plays a major role in processing emotion, and might be involved in the mechanism triggering cataplexy [54]. In narcoleptic dogs, neurons of the amygdala increase firing during cataplectic attacks [49]. A recent study indicates that bilateral lesions of the amygdala significantly reduce the frequency of cataplectic attacks in mice lacking orexin [55▪▪]. GABAergic neurons in the amygdala send descending inhibitory projection to the locus coeruleus, the lateral pontine tegmentum and the vlPAG – regions that function to promote waking muscle tone [55▪▪].

Back to Top | Article Outline

RAPID EYE MOVEMENT SLEEP BEHAVIOR DISORDER: BREAKDOWN OF RAPID EYE MOVEMENT SLEEP CIRCUITRY

In REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD), the normal paralysis of REM sleep is lost [56], leaving afflicted individuals able to enact their dreams, often injuring themselves or their bed partner in the process [57]. It has been hypothesized that damage of the brainstem circuits responsible for REM sleep atonia underlies the expression of RBD [58▪]. Physical or genetic lesions of the REM sleep core (i.e, SubC or ventromedial medulla) in animal models lead to RBD [59,60]. Recent brain imaging studies and postmortem tissue analysis of patients affected by RBD indicate that lesions encompassing the REM sleep circuit are associated with the disorder [61–63].

During normal REM sleep, muscle twitches interrupt muscle paralysis. Identifying mechanisms controlling this phasic motor activity may also clarify how exaggeration of such events contributes to RBD. Intracellular recording studies show that intermittent release of glutamate excites motoneurons and causes REM sleep muscle twitches [64], through activation of non-N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors [65]. In addition to being responsible for the lack of muscle tone, GABA and glycine release help restrain phasic REM sleep activity. Pharmacological and genetic blockade of the GABA and glycine inhibitory mechanism increases motor twitches during REM sleep [59,60]. This suggests that the exaggerated motor activity seen in RBD patients can result from the overexcitation of the circuit generating twitches or the breakdown of components of the REM sleep muscle atonia circuit.

Movements in RBD are often highly coordinated and resemble stereotypical movements seen in wakefulness. This suggests that the motor cortex may also be involved in driving movements in RBD. Pyramidal tract neurons, which mediate voluntary limb movement, are highly active during both wakefulness and REM sleep [66]. However, destruction of descending corticospinal fibers does not prevent expression of REM sleep muscle twitches [67], and twitching is still present in pontine animals (animals subjected to transection of the brain above the pons) and decorticate humans [68]. Finally, a recent study in neonatal rats shows that REM sleep muscle twitches drive the activity and development of the motor cortex, rather than being the result of cortical activation [69].

Patients with RBD also exhibit changes in normal cholinergic system activity. Neuroimaging studies suggest that patients with RBD have significant degeneration of brain cholinergic systems [70]. Given that a cholinergic mechanism contributes to promote REM sleep atonia [71▪▪], degeneration of brainstem cholinergic systems could underlie motor symptoms in patients with RBD.

Back to Top | Article Outline

OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA: MECHANISMS AND TREATMENT

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a disorder characterized by repeated episodes of airway narrowing and closure during sleep. OSA can be severe in REM sleep [72] because of additional recruitment of inhibitory inputs to the cranial motor pools, thus further precipitating upper airway closure in this state. The inhibitory mechanisms responsible for the suppression of upper airway motor (i.e., hypoglossal) activity have recently been identified [73,74]. Local pharmacological manipulation of hypoglossal neurotransmission revealed that motor inactivation during REM sleep is caused by activation of muscarinic Ach receptors and G-protein coupled inwardly rectifying potassium channels [71▪▪].

In a separate study, intracellular recording of hypoglossal motor neurons showed that their inactivation in REM sleep is also caused by chloride-dependent postsynaptic inhibition [75]. The latter was recorded from nonrespiratory/tonically active hypoglossal motoneurons, whereas the REM sleep-specific cholinergic inhibition, reported in the former study, affected the respiratory component of genioglossus muscle activity.

In respiratory muscles, some respiratory activity can persist in REM sleep despite loss of background muscle tone, suggesting that respiratory and tonic motor units may be differentially modulated by REM sleep inhibitory/excitatory processes [76,77]. REM sleep-specific cholinergic motor inhibition preferentially inhibits respiratory motoneurons and respiratory inputs. Further identification of the mechanisms responsible for pharyngeal motor control and upper airway collapse is needed to develop rational pharmacological treatment of OSA. Recent studies have identified that peripheral [78] and central [79,80] modulation of potassium channels may be an effective strategy to reverse upper airway collapsibility in sleep.

Back to Top | Article Outline

CONCLUSION

Complex interactions between the core of the REM sleep generation circuit and other brainstem, hypothalamic and forebrain structures lead to the expression of REM sleep. Both direct cholinergic activation [33▪▪,34] and GABAergic inhibition release [27,28], trigger activation of SubC glutamatergic neurons, and hence generate the transition into REM sleep. Descending SubC projections activate GABA and glycine release onto motoneurons [35,36], producing the total body paralysis characteristic of this state. Overexpression of REM sleep characteristics or imbalanced activation of REM sleep circuitry are the roots of several sleep disorders. Untimely activation of the REM sleep core-generating system leads to crippling body paralysis during cataplexic attacks in narcoleptic patients [38▪]. Overexpression of motor activity and/or failure to shut down muscles during REM sleep are the cardinal expressions of RBD [58▪]. Finally, cholinergic-mediated loss of muscle tone in upper airway muscles may help to explain the airway obstruction in OSA [71▪▪]. Further investigation of the interplay between the various parts of the REM sleep-generating circuit will assist in targeting new approaches to treat these sleep-related disorders.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Acknowledgements

None.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES AND RECOMMENDED READING

Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • ▪ of special interest
  • ▪▪ of outstanding interest
Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Aserinsky E, Kleitman N. Regularly occurring periods of eye motility, and concomitant phenomena, during sleep. Science 1953; 118:273–274.
2. Dement W, Kleitman N. Cyclic variations in EEG during sleep and their relation to eye movements, body motility, and dreaming. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1957; 9:673–690.
3. Dement WC, Kryger MH, Roth T. Principles and practice of sleep medicine. 5th edPhiladelphia: Toronto: Saunders; 2011.
4. Siegel JM, Tomaszewski KS, Nienhuis R. Behavioral states in the chronic medullary and midpontine cat. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1986; 63:274–288.
5. Luppi PH, Clement O, Fort P. Paradoxical (REM) sleep genesis by the brainstem is under hypothalamic control. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2013; 23:786–792.
6. Boissard R, Gervasoni D, Schmidt MH, et al. The rat ponto-medullary network responsible for paradoxical sleep onset and maintenance: a combined microinjection and functional neuroanatomical study. Eur J Neurosci 2002; 16:1959–1973.
7. Lu J, Sherman D, Devor M, et al. A putative flip-flop switch for control of REM sleep. Nature 2006; 441:589–594.
8. Baghdoyan HA, Rodrigo-Angulo ML, McCarley RW, Hobson JA. Site-specific enhancement and suppression of desynchronized sleep signs following cholinergic stimulation of three brainstem regions. Brain Res 1984; 306:39–52.
9. Boissard R, Fort P, Gervasoni D, et al. Localization of the GABAergic and non GABAergic neurons projecting to the sublaterodorsal nucleus and potentially gating paradoxical sleep onset. Eur J Neurosci 2003; 18:1627–1639.
10. Siegel JM, Nienhuis R, Fahringer HM, et al. Neuronal activity in narcolepsy: identification of cataplexy-related cells in the medial medulla. Science 1991; 252:1315–1318.
11. Maloney KJ, Mainville L, Jones BE. Differential c-Fos expression in cholinergic, monoaminergic, and GABAergic cell groups of the pontomesencephalic tegmentum after paradoxical sleep deprivation and recovery. J Neurosci 1999; 19:3057–3072.
12. Clement O, Sapin E, Bérod A, et al. Evidence that neurons of the sublaterodorsal tegmental nucleus triggering paradoxical (REM) sleep are glutamatergic. Sleep 2011; 34:419–423.
13. Lai YY, Siegel JM. Medullary regions mediating atonia. J Neurosci 1988; 8:4790–4796.
14. Schenkel E, Siegel JM. REM-sleep without atonia after lesions of the medial medulla. Neurosci Lett 1989; 98:159–165.
15. Holmes CJ, Mainville LS, Jones BE. Distribution of cholinergic, GABAergic and serotonergic neurons in the medial medullary reticular formation and their projections studied by cytotoxic lesions in the cat. Neuroscience 1994; 62:1155–1178.
16. Vetrivelan R, Fuller PM, Tong Q, Lu J. Medullary circuitry regulating rapid eye movement sleep and motor atonia. J Neurosci 2009; 29:9361–9369.
17. Kodama T, Lai YY, Siegel JM. Changes in inhibitory amino acid release linked to pontine-induced atonia: an in vivo microdialysis study. J Neurosci 2003; 23:1548–1554.
18. Brooks PL, Peever JH. Glycinergic and GABAA-mediated inhibition of somatic motoneurons does not mediate rapid eye movement sleep motor atonia. J Neurosci 2008; 28:3535–3545.
19. Brooks PL, Peever JH. Identification of the transmitter and receptor mechanisms responsible for REM sleep paralysis. J Neurosci 2012; 32:9785–9795.
20. Gervasoni D, Peyron C, Rampon C, et al. Role and origin of the GABAergic innervation of dorsal raphe serotonergic neurons. J Neurosci 2000; 20:4217–4225.
21. Luppi PH, Gervasoni D, Verret L, et al. Paradoxical (REM) sleep genesis: the switch from an aminergic-cholinergic to a GABAergic-glutamatergic hypothesis. J Physiol Paris 2006; 100:271–283.
22. Ennis M, Aston-Jones G. GABA-mediated inhibition of locus coeruleus from the dorsomedial rostral medulla. J Neurosci 1989; 9:2973–2981.
23. Ennis M, Aston-Jones G. Potent inhibitory input to locus coeruleus from the nucleus prepositus hypoglossi. Brain Res Bull 1989; 22:793–803.
24. Kaur S, Saxena RN, Mallick BN. GABAergic neurons in prepositus hypoglossi regulate REM sleep by its action on locus coeruleus in freely moving rats. Synapse 2001; 42:141–150.
25. Verret L, Fort P, Gervasoni D, et al. Localization of the neurons active during paradoxical (REM) sleep and projecting to the locus coeruleus noradrenergic neurons in the rat. J Comp Neurol 2006; 495:573–586.
26. Sapin E, Lapray D, Berod A, et al. Localization of the brainstem GABAergic neurons controlling paradoxical (REM) sleep. PLoS One 2009; 4:e4272.
27. Boissard R, Fort P, Gervasoni D, et al. Localization of the GABAergic and non GABAergic neurons projecting to the sublaterodorsal nucleus and potentially gating paradoxical sleep onset. Eur J Neurosci 2003; 18:1627–1639.
28. Sastre JP, Buda C, Kitahama K, Jouvet M. Importance of the ventrolateral region of the periaqueductal gray and adjacent tegmentum in the control of paradoxical sleep as studied by muscimol microinjections in the cat. Neuroscience 1996; 74:415–426.
29▪▪. Konadhode RR, Pelluru D, Blanco-Centurion C, et al. Optogenetic stimulation of MCH neurons increases sleep. J Neurosci 2013; 33:10257–10263.

Optogenetic study showing that stimulation of MCH cells triggers rapid onset of sleep, demonstrating a clear somnogenic role for MCH.

30▪▪. Jego S, Glasgow SD, Herrera CG, et al. Optogenetic identification of a rapid eye movement sleep modulatory circuit in the hypothalamus. Nat Neurosci 2013; 16:1637–1643.

Optogenetics investigation demonstrating that MCH neurons promote and stabilize REM sleep by inhibiting wake-promoting circuitry.

31. Lu J, Bjorkum AA, Xu M, et al. Selective activation of the extended ventrolateral preoptic nucleus during rapid eye movement sleep. J Neurosci 2002; 22:4568–4576.
32. Hobson JA, McCarley RW, Wyzinski PW. Sleep cycle oscillation: reciprocal discharge by two brainstem neuronal groups. Science 1975; 189:55–58.
33▪▪. Weng FJ, Williams RH, Hawryluk JM, et al. Carbachol excites sublaterodorsal nucleus neurons projecting to the spinal cord. J Physiol 2014; 592:1601–1617.

Electrophysiologic study suggesting that acetylcholine contributes to REM sleep muscle atonia through excitation of spinally projecting SubC neurons.

34. Boissard R, Gervasoni D, Schmidt MH, et al. The rat ponto-medullary network responsible for paradoxical sleep onset and maintenance: a combined microinjection and functional neuroanatomical study. Eur J Neurosci 2002; 16:1959–1973.
35. Grace KP, Vanstone LE, Horner RL. Reconciliation of the reciprocal interaction and flip-flop models of rapid eye movement sleep generation [online]. In: Program No. 478.24 2013 Neuroscience Meeting Planner; San Diego, California: Society for Neuroscience: 2013.
36. Brandman O, Ferrell JE Jr, Li R, et al. Interlinked fast and slow positive feedback loops drive reliable cell decisions. Science 2005; 310:496–498.
37. Dauvilliers Y, Arnulf I, Mignot E. Narcolepsy with cataplexy. Lancet 2007; 369:499–511.
38▪. Dauvilliers Y, Siegel JM, Lopez R, et al. Cataplexy-clinical aspects, pathophysiology and management strategy. Nat Rev Neurol 2014; 10:386–395.

Review on the pathophysiology of cataplexy, potential neural mechanism and therapeutic treatment.

39. Mignot E, Lin L, Rogers W, et al. Complex HLA-DR and -DQ interactions confer risk of narcolepsy-cataplexy in three ethnic groups. Am J Hum Genet 2001; 68:686–699.
40. Faraco J, Lin L, Kornum BR, et al. ImmunoChip study implicates antigen presentation to T cells in narcolepsy. PLoS Genet 2013; 9:e1003270.
41. Hallmayer J, Faraco J, Lin L, et al. Narcolepsy is strongly associated with the T-cell receptor alpha locus. Nat Genet 2009; 41:708–711.
42. Kornum BR, Kawashima M, Faraco J, et al. Common variants in P2RY11 are associated with narcolepsy. Nat Genet 2015; 43:66–71.
43. Dauvilliers Y, Arnulf I, Lecendreux M, et al. Increased risk of narcolepsy in children and adults after pandemic H1N1 vaccination in France. Brain 2013; 136:2486–2496.
44. Hor H, Kutalik Z, Dauvilliers Y, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies new HLA class II haplotypes strongly protective against narcolepsy. Nat Genet 2015; 42:786–789.
45. Partinen M, Saarenpää-Heikkilä O, Ilveskoski I, et al. Increased incidence and clinical picture of childhood narcolepsy following the 2009 H1N1 pandemic vaccination campaign in Finland. PLoS One 2012; 7:e33723.
46. Dauvilliers Y, Billiard M, Montplaisir J. Clinical aspects and pathophysiology of narcolepsy. Clin Neurophysiol 2003; 114:2000–2017.
47. Peever J. Control of motoneuron function and muscle tone during REM sleep, REM sleep behavior disorder and cataplexy/narcolepsy. Arch Ital Biol 2011; 149:454–466.
48. Hong SB, Tae WS, Joo EY. Cerebral perfusion changes during cataplexy in narcolepsy patients. Neurology 2006; 66:1747–1749.
49. Gulyani S, Wu MF, Nienhuis R, et al. Cataplexy-related neurons in the amygdala of the narcoleptic dog. Neuroscience 2002; 112:355–365.
50. Vetrugno R, D’Angelo R, Moghadam KK, et al. Behavioural and neurophysiological correlates of human cataplexy: a video-polygraphic study. Clin Neurophysiol 2012; 121:153–162.
51. Overeem S, van Nues SJ, van der Zande WL, et al. The clinical features of cataplexy: a questionnaire study in narcolepsy patients with and without hypocretin-1 deficiency. Sleep Med 2015; 12:12–18.
52. Burgess CR, Peever JH. A noradrenergic mechanism functions to couple motor behavior with arousal state. Curr Biol 2013; 23:1719–1725.
53. Siegel JM, Boehmer LN. Narcolepsy and the hypocretin system—where motion meets emotion. Nat Clin Pract Neurol 2006; 2:548–556.
54. LeDoux J. The amygdala. Curr Biol 2007; 17:R868–R874.
55▪▪. Burgess CR, Oishi Y, Mochizuki T, et al. Amygdala lesions reduce cataplexy in orexin knock-out mice. J Neurosci 2013; 33:9734–9742.

Study demonstrating by which neural mechanism positive emotion may trigger cataplexy.

56. Schenck CH, Mahowald MW. REM sleep parasomnias. Neurol Clin 1996; 14:697–720.
57. Schenck CH, Lee SA, Bornemann MA, Mahowald MW. Potentially lethal behaviors associated with rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder: review of the literature and forensic implications. J Forensic Sci 2009; 54:1475–1484.
58▪. Peever J, Luppi PH, Montplaisir J. Breakdown in REM sleep circuitry underlies REM sleep behavior disorder. Trends Neurosci 2014; 37:279–288.

Review on the pathophysiology of RBD, potential neural mechanism involved and therapeutic treatment.

59. Luppi PH, Clément O, Sapin E, et al. The neuronal network responsible for paradoxical sleep and its dysfunctions causing narcolepsy and rapid eye movement (REM) behavior disorder. Sleep Med Rev 2011; 15:153–163.
60. Brooks PL, Peever JH. Impaired GABA and glycine transmission triggers cardinal features of rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder in mice. J Neurosci 2011; 31:7111–7121.
61. Iranzo A, Tolosa E, Gelpi E, et al. Neurodegenerative disease status and postmortem pathology in idiopathic rapid-eye-movement sleep behaviour disorder: an observational cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2013; 12:443–453.
62. Scherfler C, Frauscher B, Schocke M, et al. White and gray matter abnormalities in idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder: a diffusion-tensor imaging and voxel-based morphometry study. Ann Neurol 2011; 69:400–407.
63. Garcia-Lorenzo D, Longo-Dos Santos C, Ewenczyk C, et al. The coeruleus/subcoeruleus complex in rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorders in Parkinson's disease. Brain 2013; 136:2120–2129.
64. Soja PJ, López-Rodríguez F, Morales FR, Chase MH. Effects of excitatory amino acid antagonists on the phasic depolarizing events that occur in lumbar motoneurons during REM periods of active sleep. J Neurosci 1995; 15:4068–4076.
65. Burgess C, Lai D, Siegel J, Peever J. An endogenous glutamatergic drive onto somatic motoneurons contributes to the stereotypical pattern of muscle tone across the sleep-wake cycle. J Neurosci 2008; 28:4649–4660.
66. Evarts EV. Temporal patterns of discharge of pyramidal tract neurons during sleep and waking in the monkey. J Neurophysiol 1964; 27:152–171.
67. Pompeiano O. The neurophysiological mechanisms of the postural and motor events during desynchronized sleep. Proc Assoc Res Nerv Ment Dis 1967; 45:351–423.
68. Jouvet M, Jouvet D. A study of the neurophysiological mechanisms of dreaming. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1963; (Suppl 24):133.
69. Tiriac A, Uitermarkt BD, Fanning AS, et al. Rapid whisker movements in sleeping newborn rats. Curr Biol 2012; 22:2075–2080.
70. Kotagal V, Albin RL, Müller ML, et al. Symptoms of rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder are associated with cholinergic denervation in Parkinson disease. Ann Neurol 2012; 71:560–568.
71▪▪. Grace KP, Hughes SW, Horner RL. Identification of the mechanism mediating genioglossus muscle suppression in REM sleep. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 187:311–319.

Study identifying a powerful cholinergic-GIRK channel mechanism that inhibits the hypoglossal motor pool during REM sleep.

72. Peregrim I, Gresova S, Pallayova M, et al. Does obstructive sleep apnea worsen during REM sleep? Physiol Res 2013; 62:569–575.
73. Horner RL, Hughes SW, Malhotra A. State-dependent and reflex drives to the upper airway: basic physiology with clinical implications. J Appl Physiol 2014; 116:325–336.
74. McSharry DG, Saboisky JP, Deyoung P, et al. Physiological mechanisms of upper airway hypotonia during REM sleep. Sleep 2014; 37:561–569.
75. Fung SJ, Chase MH. Postsynaptic inhibition of hypoglossal motoneurons produces atonia of the genioglossal muscle during REM sleep. Sleep 2014.
76. Phillipson EA, Bowes G. Chernlack NS, Widdlcombe JG, American Physiological Society. Control of breathing during sleep. Handbook of physiology, section 3, the respiratory system, Vol. II, control of breathing, part 2 2nd edPhiladelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 1986. 649–689.
77. Fraigne JJ, Orem JM. Phasic motor activity of respiratory and nonrespiratory muscles in REM sleep. Sleep 2011; 34:425–434.
78. Wirth KJ, Steinmeyer K, Ruetten H. Sensitization of upper airway mechanoreceptors as a new pharmacologic principle to treat obstructive sleep apnea: investigations with AVE0118 in anesthetized pigs. Sleep 2013; 36:699–708.
79. Grace KP, Hughes SW, Horner RL. Identification of a pharmacological target for genioglossus reactivation throughout sleep. Sleep 2014; 37:41–50.
80. Grace KP, Hughes SW, Shahabi S, et al. K+ channel modulation causes genioglossus inhibition in REM sleep and is a strategy for reactivation. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2013; 188:277–288.
Keywords:

brainstem; cataplexy; narcolepsy; obstructive sleep apnea; rapid eye movement sleep; rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder; subcoeruleus nucleus

© 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins