Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

CANCER BIOLOGY: Edited by Pierre Hainaut and Amelie Plymoth

Posttranscriptional methylation of transfer and ribosomal RNA in stress response pathways, cell differentiation, and cancer

Popis, Martyna C.*; Blanco, Sandra*; Frye, Michaela

Author Information
doi: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000252
  • Open

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Homeostasis in most mammalian tissues is achieved by stem cells that continuously maintain their population (self-renewal) while generating numerous differentiated cells. During self-renewal, stem cells have to avoid cell cycle exit and differentiation, whereas during differentiation, stem cells must evade uncontrolled proliferation. The unique properties of stem cells are controlled by a dynamic interplay between extrinsic and intrinsic regulatory mechanisms. Extrinsic mechanisms include signalling from the neighbouring niche cells, and intrinsic mechanisms include epigenetic, transcriptional, and translational pathways. The transcriptional regulation of stem cells is now increasingly well understood in both embryonic and adult tissues, yet the precise roles of posttranscriptional mechanisms in regulating stem cell maintenance and differentiation remain unclear.

Best characterized is the role of the microRNA pathways in regulating stem cell self-renewal and differentiation, and the importance of specific microRNAs in repressing selected mRNAs in stem and differentiated daughter cells has been shown in embryonic stem cells, germline stem cells, and somatic tissue stem cells [1]. The overall function of the microRNA pathways has been studied by using for instance DGCR8 and Dicer knockout mouse embryonic stem cells. Both proteins are essential for the production of mature microRNAs. Interestingly, in both of the cases, the knockout embryonic stem cells are viable but exhibit severe growth and differentiation defects [2,3]. All cellular RNAs are subject to processing, quality control, and surveillance pathways, and at each step, RNA is dynamically associated with RNA-binding proteins. Posttranscriptional modifications have emerged as important determinants for the dynamic and temporal accurate binding of proteins to their targeted RNA molecules.

F1-12
Box 1:
no caption available

POSTTRANSCRIPTIONAL METHYLATION IN MULTICELLULAR ORGANISMS

More than 100 distinct chemical modifications have been found in eukaryotic RNAs [4]. However, in multicellular organisms, the enzymes responsible for each of the modifications as well as the biological roles of these modifications remain unclear. Methylation is one of the most common enzyme-catalyzed modifications [4,5]. The majority of the methyl-based modifications are conserved from bacteria to mammals and plants, and their functions include structural and metabolic stabilization as well as functional roles in regulating protein translation [6–9]. The existence of methylated nucleosides in RNA including 5-methylcytidine (m5C) and N6-methyladenosine (m6A) in noncoding and coding RNA has been described decades ago, but their precise location, abundance, and cellular functions have until recently remained controversial [10–15].

New approaches to capture m5C and m6A modifications transcriptome-wide confirmed dynamic and conserved methylation throughout the mammalian transcriptome [16–22]. Only in the last few years, it has become evident that posttranscriptional methylation of both nucleosides regulate a wide range of fundamental cellular processes and that loss-of-function mutations in methylating and demethylating enzymes are cause of severe human diseases, including neurological disorders [23▪,24▪,25]. The m6A modification is most prevalent in messenger RNAs (mRNAs) and has been extensively reviewed elsewhere [24▪,26–29]. Therefore, we will focus on the functional and biological roles of m5C, which is mainly found in noncoding RNAs [15].

Cytosine-5 methylation enzymes

Posttranscriptional cytosine-5 methylation is a widespread mark in the transcriptome of multicellular organisms [19]. All RNA:m5C methyltransferases contain a catalytic domain with a common structural core and the S-adenosyl methionine binding site. Two conserved cysteines, both located within a sequence with similarity to a methyltransferase active site are required for the transfer of the methyl group [30]. To initiate methylation, the catalytic cysteine residue forms a covalent bond with the cytosine pyrimidine ring [31]. The second conserved cysteine residue is then required to break the covalent adduct and releases the methylated RNA and the enzyme [30,32].

The first confirmed RNA:m5C methyltransferases in multicellular organisms were the DNA methyltransferase homolog Dnmt2 and the NOP2/Sun domain RNA methyltransferase family member NSun2, both of which were found to methylate transfer RNA (tRNA) [33,34]. Recently, three more NSun family members, namely NSun4, 5, and 6 have been described to methylate mitochondrial and cytoplasmic ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and tRNA, respectively (Fig. 1a) [9,35,36▪▪,37,38▪]. m5C is predicted to be deposited by at least three more RNA:m5C methyltransferases (NSun 1, 3, and 7), yet their substrate specificity remains to be confirmed in mammals.

F2-12
FIGURE 1:
(a) Cytosine-5 methylation is placed on tRNAs by the site-specific RNA methyltransferases Dnmt2, NSun2, and NSun6; on vault RNA by NSun2; on mitochondrially transcribed ribosomal RNA (rRNA) by NSun4 and on nuclear transcribed rRNA by NSun1 and NSun5. (b) NSun2 and Dnmt2 tRNA methylation prevents from cleavage by angiogenin. In the absence of NSun2 and Dnmt2-mediated tRNA methylation, tRNAs are cleaved and 5′ fragments accumulate, which results in repression of protein synthesis. Arrows indicate RNAs shuffling in and out of the nucleus.

One common methylation target of Dnmt2, NSun2, and NSun6 is nuclear encoded tRNA. However, the deposition of the methyl mark by these three enzymes takes place in a strict site-specific manner. Dnmt2 targets the anticodon loop (C38) of aspartate, valine, and glycine tRNAs [33,39], NSun2 methylates cytosines in the variable loop (C48–50) of most transcribed tRNAs [34,39,40▪▪]. NSun6 targets the 3′ end of the tRNA acceptor stem (C72) of cysteine and threonine tRNAs [35]. In contrast to Dnmt2 and NSun6, NSun2 additionally methylates other noncoding RNAs such as vault RNAs [15,21]. The only confirmed RNA target of NSun4 is the mitochondrially encoded rRNA 12S [38▪]. NSun1 and 5 have also been linked to rRNA methylation. NSun1 (Nop2/p120) orthologs in yeast and Arabidopsis have been suggested to methylate 25S rRNA [9,41–43]. Worm, plant, fly, and yeast homologs of NSun5 methylate 28S/25S rRNA in a region located in close proximity to the peptidyltransferase centre [9,36▪▪,41,42]. Human NSun5 coprecipitates with ribosomes suggesting that 28S RNA may be a conserved substrate of NSun5 in mammals [44]. The substrate specificities of NSun3 and 7 are unknown. In contrast to m5C on DNA or m6A in mRNA, an enzyme that removes 5-methylcytosine from RNA has yet to be identified.

Functional roles of 5-methylcytidine

The functional consequences of Dnmt2 and NSun2-mediated methylation of tRNAs are now well understood. Deposition of m5C by both enzymes protects tRNAs from endonucleolytic cleavage [39,40▪▪,45]. Lack of m5C at the tRNA variable loop in the absence of NSun2 increases the affinity of the endonuclease angiogenin (Fig. 1b). Angiogenin cleaves the tRNA into halves and only the small noncoding RNAs derived from the 5′ end of the tRNAs accumulate, whereas the 3′ tRNA fragments degrade in the cells [40▪▪]. The molecular function of 5′ tRNA fragments is to repress cap-dependent translation by displacing translation initiation and elongation factors from mRNAs or by interfering with efficient transpeptidation [46–49]. Accordingly, global protein synthesis is reduced in the absence of NSun2 in vitro and in vivo[40▪▪]. In contrast, loss of Dnmt2-mediated methylation of tRNA AspGTC, GlyGCC, and ValAAC at C38 causes tRNA-specific fragmentation patterns, which leads to specific codon mistranslation [50▪▪]. Cytosine-5 methylation of vault noncoding RNAs by NSun2 alters their processing into Argonaute-associated small RNA fragments that can function as microRNAs and regulate expression of targeted mRNAs [18].

Cytosine-5 methylation of rRNA is fundamental for ribosome biogenesis, and therefore influences protein synthesis. Loss of NSun4-mediated 12S rRNA methylation affects ribosomal subunits assembly and leads to a strong inhibition of mitochondrial translation [38▪,51,52]. The molecular role of NSun1 and NSun5-mediated methylation in multicellular eukaryotes is unknown, but work in yeasts showed a key role in ribosome assembly and translational regulation. Loss of NSun1 yeast homolog Nop2 causes defects in pre-rRNA processing, 60S biogenesis, and a significant reduction in polysome assembly [41,43,53,54]. In contrast, loss of NSun5 yeast homolog Rcm1 does not affect polysome assembly, but it relaxes the 25S rRNA structure, which alters the translation fidelity only under certain stress conditions [36▪▪,41].

The correct deposition of m5C into both tRNA and rRNA is essential for normal development. Consistent with NSun4's essential mitochondrial function, its deletion in mice is embryonic lethal [38▪]. NSun2 is highest expressed in brain, skin, and testis, and deletion of NSun2 impairs the development of all the three tissues. In brain, loss-of-function of NSun2 causes neuro-developmental deficits (i.e. microcephaly) in mouse and human [40▪▪,55–58]. Morphologically brain, skin, and testis show significant delays in cell differentiation during development [39,59,60]. In skin, NSun2 expression is restricted to a distinct progenitor population in the hair follicle, and loss of NSun2 causes delays in the activation of stem cells, leading to a delay in differentiation of hair lineages [59]. Morpholino-mediated loss of Dnmt2 in zebrafish reduced the size of the morphants by half and specifically affected liver, retina, and brain development because of a failure to conduct late differentiation [61]. Deletion of Dnmt2 in mice is not lethal, but endochondral ossification is delayed in newborn Dnmt2-deficient mice, which is accompanied by a reduction of the haematopoietic stem and progenitor cell population and a cell-autonomous defect in their differentiation [50▪▪].

Together, cytosine-5 RNA methylation pathways play a diverse role during development, yet they all converge in their function to ensure efficient and correct protein translation, a function that seems to be dispensable for tissue stem cell self-renewal but required for accurate lineage commitment and differentiation.

Cytosine-5 methylation pathways and the cellular stress response

Posttranscriptional control is not only important to direct the proper steps during RNA metabolism pathways, but also plays a prominent role in modulating rapid cellular responses to environmental changes [62,63▪]. Deletion of m5C methyltransferases in yeast, flies, worms, and mice is usually not lethal [33,36▪▪,41,54,59,64,65]. However, in virtually all cases, the level of m5C modification plays a key role in regulating the cellular response to stress stimuli, including drugs, DNA damage, oxidative stress, or environmental cues [40▪▪,45,64,66▪].

Angiogenin-mediated tRNA cleavage is a conserved response to oxidative stress in eukaryotes [67–69]. Several lines of evidence suggest that angiogenin-mediated stress response is directly controlled by tRNA modifications. Levels of m5C in tRNAs change in response to oxidative stress in yeast [70]. Loss of m5C through deletion of Dnmt2 or NSun2 increases stress-induced cleavage of tRNAs and sensitizes flies, mice, and human cells to oxidative stress [40▪▪,45]. Stress-induced cleaved 5′ tRNA fragments inhibit protein synthesis by displacing translation initiation factors from mRNAs [46,71]. The reduction of global protein synthesis is an integral part of stress responses to allow cells to alleviate cellular injury or alternatively induce apoptosis [72]. Interestingly, 5′ tRNA fragments are sufficient and required to trigger cellular stress responses, and induce the apoptotic pathway in the absence of NSun2 [40▪▪]. Thus, cellular survival during the oxidative stress response may directly require the ‘re-methylation’ of tRNAs to ensure translational fidelity and relieve stress-induced translational bias [50▪▪,73,74].

Stress-induced reprogramming of the translational machinery might be a conserved mechanism. For instance, changes in m5C levels in LeuCAA tRNA or 25S rRNA cause selective translation toward specific transcripts during stress responses in yeast [36▪▪,74,75]. Although loss of m5C in tRNA sensitizes yeast, flies, mice, and human cells to stress, loss of NSun5-mediated rRNA methylation increases resistance to stress stimuli and the lifespan in yeast, worms, and flies [36▪▪,40▪▪]. Ribosomes are able to modulate their translation capacity in response to various environmental stimuli by differential expression of ribosomal building blocks, but one can also hypothesize that posttranscriptional modifications of rRNAs such as NSun5-mediated methylation is required to shape the ribosome in rapid responses to stress stimuli [36▪▪]. For instance, ribosomes that lack pseudouridine modifications show a direct impairment in binding to internal ribosome entry site elements [73]. Internal ribosome entry site is an RNA-structured element positioned at the 5′ untranslated region of specific mRNAs that can recruit the ribosome directly to the initiation region of mRNAs with a reduced requirement for canonical initiation factors [53]. More than 10% of cellular mRNAs rely on cap-independent mechanisms, which are used in response to stress stimuli [54]. Ribosomal profiling has recently uncovered enriched ribosomal occupancy in many novel upstream open reading frames, a shift in the translation machinery that appears in stress responses [20,52,76]. How this shift of ribosomal occupancy is regulated is still poorly understood. Manipulating the levels of posttranscriptional modifications in rRNA may allow cells to quickly adapt and ‘specialize’ their ribosomes, a paradigm that is emerging for heterogeneity in ribosomes as a mechanism for stress adaptation in bacteria [77].

Implications for cytosine-5 methylation pathways in cancer

The rate of tRNA synthesis is regulated by both oncogene and tumour suppressors, and tRNA levels can drive changes in mRNA translation and cell growth [78]. Apart from their canonical function as decoders of the genomic code, tRNAs emerged as regulators of cell signalling through tRNA-derived small noncoding RNAs [79]. Differential abundance of small noncoding RNAs derived from cleaved tRNAs has been described for human breast and prostate cancer [80,81,82▪]. Elevated protein synthesis and perturbations in several components of the translational apparatus have been linked to increased cancer susceptibility [83].

The precise role of cytosine-5 methylation and their respective RNA methylases in cancer development, progression, and metastasis is currently unclear. Dnmt2 is upregulated in multiple tumour samples [84]. Some of the 61 somatic mutations found in Dnmt2 in tumours originating from different tissues strongly modulated the enzymatic activity of Dnmt2, indicating a potential role in cancer [85▪]. Inhibition of Dnmt2 decreases the metabolic activity of human cancer cell lines [86]. NSun1 (also called NOP2 or p120) regulates cell cycle progression in tumourigenesis [53,87–91]. Whether and how the enzymatic activity of NSun1 is required to mediate these cellular processes remains unclear.

NSun2 was originally identified as a transcriptional target gene for the oncogene c-Myc [92]. Genomic gain of 5p15 that includes the NSUN2 gene can result in high-expression of NSUN2 in a range of epithelial tumours [93]. However, genomic gain of NSUN2 is not indicative of tumour malignancy, and although growth of human squamous-cell-carcinoma xenografts into host mice is decreased, when NSun2 is inhibited by RNAi, deletion of NSun2 in cancer cell lines does not affect proliferation or cell cycle progression [92,93]. These opposing effects may rather reflect a role for NSun2 in stress response pathways rather than proliferation, and expression of NSun2 may increase survival of tumour cells. In fact, recent evidence showed that combined knockdown of NSun2 and the tRNA methyltransferase Mettl1 in HeLa cells potentiated the sensitivity of cells to 5-fluorouracil [66▪]. Whether NSun2's role in tumourigenesis is entirely mediated through its methylating activity is currently unknown. Considering that NSun2 methylates about 80% of all expressed tRNAs and that lack of NSun2-mediated methylation causes tRNA cleavage resulting in a strong reduction of global protein synthesis [40▪▪], the main role of NSun2 downstream of c-Myc may be the coordination of protein synthesis. Myc plays an important role in regulating protein translation through transcriptional regulation of RNA and protein components of ribosomes and translation initiation factors [94,95].

CONCLUSION

The role of posttranscriptional RNA methylation is far from being fully understood, but a consensus on a role in fine-tuning of protein synthesis to regulate stem cell function and differentiation is emerging. As the vast majority of cellular noncoding RNA is involved in translation, it is not surprising that posttranscriptional modifications of RNA provide means for fast regulation of cellular protein content when necessary, for example, in response to a changing microenvironment.

RNA methylation has been extensively studied in yeast; however, many orthologs with a known function in yeast have not been identified in mammalian cells yet. As many mechanisms, for instance translation initiation, are considerably more complex in mammals than in yeast, novel genetically modified cells and mouse models are needed to investigate the function of RNA methyltransferases whose targets have not yet been established. Furthermore, the level of protein redundancy in RNA methylation pathways is unknown and depletion of a single RNA methylase may not be sufficient to comprehensively understand their roles in translation processes.

Recent studies revealed that modulation of RNA methylation alters cellular function, and deregulation of these pathways can lead to complex diseases. However, more investigation is required to establish which molecular mechanisms are involved in mediating RNA methylation and what are the direct consequences of impaired RNA methylation pathways, for instance in response to stress in vitro and in vivo. Understanding the precise molecular pathways of RNA methylation and the pathological consequences of impaired RNA methylation will allow us to develop novel therapeutic strategies for human diseases such as cancer. One notable success is the development of the Mammostrat test that uses the tRNA methyltransferase 2 homolog A as a biomarker to categorize breast cancer patients into distinct risk groups [96].

Acknowledgements

We thank all our collaborators and in particular Frank Lyko, Duncan Odom, and John Marioni for endless and fruitful discussions on RNA methylation.

Financial support and sponsorship

Our research is funded by Cancer Research UK (CR-UK), Worldwide Cancer Research, the Medical Research Council (MRC), the European Research Council (ERC), and EMBO. Research in M.F.'s laboratory is supported by a core support grant from the Wellcome Trust and MRC to the Wellcome Trust-Medical Research Cambridge Stem Cell Institute.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES AND RECOMMENDED READING

Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • ▪ of special interest
  • ▪▪ of outstanding interest

REFERENCES

1. Gangaraju VK, Lin H. MicroRNAs: key regulators of stem cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009; 10:116–125.
2. Kanellopoulou C, et al. Dicer-deficient mouse embryonic stem cells are defective in differentiation and centromeric silencing. Genes Dev 2005; 19:489–501.
3. Wang Y, et al. DGCR8 is essential for microRNA biogenesis and silencing of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nat Genet 2007; 39:380–385.
4. Machnicka MA, et al. MODOMICS: a database of RNA modification pathways: 2013 update. Nucleic Acids Res 2013; 41 (Database issue):D262–D267.
5. Cantara WA, et al. The RNA modification database, RNAMDB: 2011 update. Nucleic Acids Res 2011; 39:D195–201.
6. Towns WL, Begley TJ. Transfer RNA methytransferases and their corresponding modifications in budding yeast and humans: activities, predications, and potential roles in human health. DNA Cell Biol 2012; 31:434–454.
7. Bujnicki JM, et al. Sequence-structure-function studies of tRNA:m5C methyltransferase Trm4p and its relationship to DNA:m5C and RNA:m5U methyltransferases. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32:2453–2463.
8. Motorin Y, Lyko F, Helm M. 5-methylcytosine in RNA: detection, enzymatic formation and biological functions. Nucleic Acids Res 2010; 38:1415–1430.
9. Burgess AL, David R, Searle IR. Conservation of tRNA and rRNA 5-methylcytosine in the kingdom Plantae. BMC Plant Biol 2015; 15:199.
10. Gold M, Hurwitz J, Anders M. The enzymatic methylation of RNA and DNA, II. On the species specificity of the methylation enzymes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1963; 50:164–169.
11. Dubin DT, Taylor RH. The methylation state of poly A-containing messenger RNA from cultured hamster cells. Nucleic Acids Res 1975; 2:1653–1668.
12. Wei CM, Gershowitz A, Moss B. Methylated nucleotides block 5′ terminus of HeLa cell messenger RNA. Cell 1975; 4:379–386.
13. Perry RP, et al. The methylated constituents of L cell messenger RNA: evidence for an unusual cluster at the 5′ terminus. Cell 1975; 4:387–394.
14. Bokar JA. Grosjean H. The biosynthesis and functional roles of methylated nucleosides in eukaryotic mRNA. Fine-tuning of RNA functions by modification and editing. Berlin: Springer; 2005. 141–177.
15. Hussain S, et al. Characterizing 5-methylcytosine in the mammalian epitranscriptome. Genome Biol 2013; 14:215.
16. Meyer KD, et al. Comprehensive analysis of mRNA methylation reveals enrichment in 3′ UTRs and near stop codons. Cell 2012; 149:1635–1646.
17. Dominissini D, et al. Topology of the human and mouse m6A RNA methylomes revealed by m6A-seq. Nature 2012; 485:201–206.
18. Hussain S, et al. NSun2-mediated cytosine-5 methylation of vault noncoding RNA determines its processing into regulatory small RNAs. Cell Rep 2013; 4:255–261.
19. Squires JE, et al. Widespread occurrence of 5-methylcytosine in human coding and noncoding RNA. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40:5023–5033.
20. Somers J, Poyry T, Willis AE. A perspective on mammalian upstream open reading frame function. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2013; 45:1690–1700.
21. Khoddami V, Cairns BR. Identification of direct targets and modified bases of RNA cytosine methyltransferases. Nat Biotechnol 2013; 31:458–464.
22. Schwartz S, et al. High-resolution mapping reveals a conserved, widespread, dynamic mRNA methylation program in yeast meiosis. Cell 2013; 155:1409–1421.
23▪. Blanco S, Frye M. Role of RNA methyltransferases in tissue renewal and pathology. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2014; 31:1–7.

Recent review on the roles of RNA methyltransferases during development and implications on human diseases.

24▪. Yue Y, Liu J, He C. RNA N6-methyladenosine methylation in posttranscriptional gene expression regulation. Genes Dev 2015; 29:1343–1355.

Most recent review describing the biological relevance of the m6A mRNA methylation machineries across eukaryotes.

25. Sarin LP, Leidel SA. Modify or die? RNA modification defects in metazoans. RNA Biol 2014; 11:1555–1567.
26. Lee M, Kim B, Kim VN. Emerging roles of RNA modification: m(6)A and U-tail. Cell 2014; 158:980–987.
27. Meyer KD, Jaffrey SR. The dynamic epitranscriptome: N6-methyladenosine and gene expression control. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2014; 15:313–326.
28. Wang X, He C. Reading RNA methylation codes through methyl-specific binding proteins. RNA Biol 2014; 11:669–672.
29. Chandola U, Das R, Panda B. Role of the N6-methyladenosine RNA mark in gene regulation and its implications on development and disease. Brief Funct Genomics 2015; 14:169–179.
30. King MY, Redman KL. RNA methyltransferases utilize two cysteine residues in the formation of 5-methylcytosine. Biochemistry 2002; 41:11218–11225.
31. Liu Y, Santi DV. m5C RNA and m5C DNA methyl transferases use different cysteine residues as catalysts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000; 97:8263–8265.
32. Redman KL. Assembly of protein-RNA complexes using natural RNA and mutant forms of an RNA cytosine methyltransferase. Biomacromolecules 2006; 7:3321–3326.
33. Goll MG, et al. Methylation of tRNAAsp by the DNA methyltransferase homolog Dnmt2. Science 2006; 311:395–398.
34. Brzezicha B, et al. Identification of human tRNA:m5C methyltransferase catalysing intron-dependent m5C formation in the first position of the anticodon of the pretRNA Leu (CAA). Nucleic Acids Res 2006; 34:6034–6043.
35. Haag S, et al. NSUN6 is a human RNA methyltransferase that catalyzes formation of m5C72 in specific tRNAs. RNA 2015; 21:1532–1543.
36▪▪. Schosserer M, et al. Methylation of ribosomal RNA by NSUN5 is a conserved mechanism modulating organismal lifespan. Nat Commun 2015; 6:6158.

First study showing that the cytosine-5 methylating enzyme NSun5 modulates longevity in yeast, worms, and flies and linking m5C in rRNA to translational regulation and stress response.

37. Yakubovskaya E, et al. Structure of the essential MTERF4:NSUN4 protein complex reveals how an MTERF protein collaborates to facilitate rRNA modification. Structure 2012; 20:1940–1947.
38▪. Metodiev MD, et al. NSUN4 is a dual function mitochondrial protein required for both methylation of 12S rRNA and coordination of mitoribosomal assembly. PLoS Genet 2014; 10:e1004110.

The study reveals an essential role of m5C methylation for efficient translation of mitochondrial encoded genes.

39. Tuorto F, et al. RNA cytosine methylation by Dnmt2 and NSun2 promotes tRNA stability and protein synthesis. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2012; 19:900–905.
40▪▪. Blanco S, et al. Aberrant methylation of tRNAs links cellular stress to neuro-developmental disorders. EMBO J 2014; 33:2020–2039.

The study directly links m5C methylation to angiogenin-mediated cleavage of tRNAs to microcephaly.

41. Sharma S, et al. Yeast Nop2 and Rcm1 methylate C2870 and C2278 of the 25S rRNA, respectively. Nucleic Acids Res 2013; 41:9062–9076.
42. Gigova A, et al. A cluster of methylations in the domain IV of 25S rRNA is required for ribosome stability. RNA 2014; 20:1632–1644.
43. Bourgeois G, et al. Eukaryotic rRNA modification by yeast 5-methylcytosine-methyltransferases and human proliferation-associated antigen p120. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0133321.
44. Ramani AK, et al. A map of human protein interactions derived from co-expression of human mRNAs and their orthologs. Mol Syst Biol 2008; 4:180.
45. Schaefer M, et al. RNA methylation by Dnmt2 protects transfer RNAs against stress-induced cleavage. Genes Dev 2010; 24:1590–1595.
46. Ivanov P, et al. Angiogenin-induced tRNA fragments inhibit translation initiation. Mol Cell 2011; 43:613–623.
47. Spriggs KA, Bushell M, Willis AE. Translational regulation of gene expression during conditions of cell stress. Mol Cell 2010; 40:228–237.
48. Sobala A, Hutvagner G. Small RNAs derived from the 5′ end of tRNA can inhibit protein translation in human cells. RNA Biol 2013; 10:553–563.
49. Gebetsberger J, et al. tRNA-derived fragments target the ribosome and function as regulatory noncoding RNA in Haloferax volcanii. Archaea 2012; 2012:260909.
50▪▪. Tuorto F, et al. The tRNA methyltransferase Dnmt2 is required for accurate polypeptide synthesis during haematopoiesis. EMBO J 2015; 34:2350–2362.

Study showing that Dnmt2-mediated methylation of tRNAs at the anticodon loop plays an important role in haematopoiesis and it defines a novel function tRNA methylation in ensuring accurate polypeptide synthesis.

51. Nevins TA, et al. Distinct regulation of internal ribosome entry site-mediated translation following cellular stress is mediated by apoptotic fragments of eIF4G translation initiation factor family members eIF4GI and p97/DAP5/NAT1. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:3572–3579.
52. Gerashchenko MV, Lobanov AV, Gladyshev VN. Genome-wide ribosome profiling reveals complex translational regulation in response to oxidative stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012; 109:17394–17399.
53. Sonenberg N, Hinnebusch AG. Regulation of translation initiation in eukaryotes: mechanisms and biological targets. Cell 2009; 136:731–745.
54. Spriggs KA, et al. Re-programming of translation following cell stress allows IRES-mediated translation to predominate. Biol Cell 2008; 100:27–38.
55. Khan MA, et al. Mutation in NSUN2, which encodes an RNA methyltransferase, causes autosomal-recessive intellectual disability. Am J Hum Genet 2012; 90:856–863.
56. Martinez FJ, et al. Whole exome sequencing identifies a splicing mutation in NSUN2 as a cause of a Dubowitz-like syndrome. J Med Genet 2012; 49:380–385.
57. Abbasi-Moheb L, et al. Mutations in NSUN2 cause autosomal-recessive intellectual disability. Am J Hum Genet 2012; 90:847–855.
58. Komara M, et al. A Novel single-nucleotide deletion (c.1020delA) in NSUN2 causes intellectual disability in an Emirati child. J Mol Neurosci 2015; 57:393–399.
59. Blanco S, et al. The RNA-methyltransferase Misu (NSun2) poises epidermal stem cells to differentiate. PLoS Genet 2011; 7:e1002403.
60. Hussain S, et al. The mouse cytosine-5 RNA methyltransferase NSun2 is a component of the chromatoid body and required for testis differentiation. Mol Cell Biol 2013; 33:1561–1570.
61. Rai K, et al. Dnmt2 functions in the cytoplasm to promote liver, brain, and retina development in zebrafish. Genes Dev 2007; 21:261–266.
62. Bartok O, et al. Adaptation of molecular circadian clockwork to environmental changes: a role for alternative splicing and miRNAs. Proc Biol Sci 2013; 280:20130011.
63▪. Helm M, Alfonzo JD. Posttranscriptional RNA modifications: playing metabolic games in a cell's chemical Legoland. Chem Biol 2014; 21:174–185.

Comprehensive review on posttranscriptional modifications and their function in regulating translation.

64. Wu P, et al. NCL1, a novel gene for a nonessential nuclear protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene 1998; 220 (1–2):109–117.
65. Chernyakov I, et al. Degradation of several hypomodified mature tRNA species in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is mediated by Met22 and the 5′-3′ exonucleases Rat1 and Xrn1. Genes Dev 2008; 22:1369–1380.
66▪. Okamoto M, et al. tRNA modifying enzymes, NSUN2 and METTL1, determine sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil in HeLa cells. PLoS Genet 2014; 10:e1004639.

First study linking tRNA modifying enzymes to cellular resistance to cytotoxic drugs.

67. Thompson DM, Parker R. Stressing out over tRNA cleavage. Cell 2009; 138:215–219.
68. Thompson DM, et al. tRNA cleavage is a conserved response to oxidative stress in eukaryotes. RNA 2008; 14:2095–2103.
69. Fu H, et al. Stress induces tRNA cleavage by angiogenin in mammalian cells. FEBS Lett 2009; 583:437–442.
70. Chan CT, et al. A quantitative systems approach reveals dynamic control of tRNA modifications during cellular stress. PLoS Genet 2010; 6:e1001247.
71. Yamasaki S, et al. Angiogenin cleaves tRNA and promotes stress-induced translational repression. J Cell Biol 2009; 185:35–42.
72. Wek RC, Jiang HY, Anthony TG. Coping with stress: eIF2 kinases and translational control. Biochem Soc Trans 2006; 34 (Pt 1):7–11.
73. Jack K, et al. rRNA pseudouridylation defects affect ribosomal ligand binding and translational fidelity from yeast to human cells. Mol Cell 2011; 44:660–666.
74. Endres L, Dedon PC, Begley TJ. Codon-biased translation can be regulated by wobble-base tRNA modification systems during cellular stress responses. RNA Biol 2015; 12:603–614.
75. Chan CT, et al. Reprogramming of tRNA modifications controls the oxidative stress response by codon-biased translation of proteins. Nat Commun 2012; 3:937.
76. Ingolia NT, et al. Genome-wide analysis in vivo of translation with nucleotide resolution using ribosome profiling. Science 2009; 324:218–223.
77. Vesper O, et al. Selective translation of leaderless mRNAs by specialized ribosomes generated by MazF in Escherichia coli. Cell 2011; 147:147–157.
78. Grewal SS. Why should cancer biologists care about tRNAs? tRNA synthesis, mRNA translation and the control of growth. Biochim Biophys Acta 2015; 1849:898–907.
79. Kirchner S, Ignatova Z. Emerging roles of tRNA in adaptive translation, signalling dynamics and disease. Nat Rev Genet 2015; 16:98–112.
80. Lee YS, et al. A novel class of small RNAs: tRNA-derived RNA fragments (tRFs). Genes Dev 2009; 23:2639–2649.
81. Honda S, et al. Sex hormone-dependent tRNA halves enhance cell proliferation in breast and prostate cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015; 112:E3816–E3825.
82▪. Goodarzi H, et al. Endogenous tRNA-derived fragments suppress breast cancer progression via YBX1 displacement. Cell 2015; 161:790–802.

The study reveals a tumour-suppressive role for specific tRNA-derived fragments and describes the underlying molecular mechanism for their action.

83. Ruggero D. Translational control in cancer etiology. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2013; 5:
84. Forbes SA, et al. COSMIC: exploring the world's knowledge of somatic mutations in human cancer. Nucleic Acids Res 2015; 43:D805–D811.
85▪. Elhardt W, et al. Somatic cancer mutations in the DNMT2 tRNA methyltransferase alter its catalytic properties. Biochimie 2015; 112:66–72.

The study tests how DNMT2 somatic mutations found in cancer tissues affect the activity of the enzyme.

86. Schaefer M, et al. Azacytidine inhibits RNA methylation at DNMT2 target sites in human cancer cell lines. Cancer Res 2009; 69:8127–8132.
87. de Beus E, et al. Yeast NOP2 encodes an essential nucleolar protein with homology to a human proliferation marker. J Cell Biol 1994; 127 (6 Pt 2):1799–1813.
88. Gustafson WC, et al. Nucleolar protein p120 contains an arginine-rich domain that binds to ribosomal RNA. Biochem J 1998; 331 (Pt 2):387–393.
89. Freeman JW, et al. Identification and characterization of a human proliferation-associated nucleolar antigen with a molecular weight of 120,000 expressed in early G1 phase. Cancer Res 1988; 48:1244–1251.
90. Ochs RL, et al. Intranucleolar localization of human proliferating cell nucleolar antigen p120. Cancer Res 1988; 48:6523–6529.
91. Perlaky L, et al. Increased growth of NIH/3T3 cells by transfection with human p120 complementary DNA and inhibition by a p120 antisense construct. Cancer Res 1992; 52:428–436.
92. Frye M, Watt FM. The RNA methyltransferase Misu (NSun2) mediates Myc-induced proliferation and is upregulated in tumors. Curr Biol 2006; 16:971–981.
93. Frye M, et al. Genomic gain of 5p15 leads to over-expression of Misu (NSUN2) in breast cancer. Cancer Lett 2009.
94. Schmidt EV. The role of c-myc in regulation of translation initiation. Oncogene 2004; 23:3217–3221.
95. van Riggelen J, Yetil A, Felsher DW. MYC as a regulator of ribosome biogenesis and protein synthesis. Nat Rev Cancer 2010; 10:301–309.
96. Bartlett JM, et al. Mammostrat as a tool to stratify breast cancer patients at risk of recurrence during endocrine therapy. Breast Cancer Res 2010; 12:R47.
Keywords:

cancer; cellular stress response; cytosine-5 methylation; noncoding RNA; NSun proteins; stem cells

Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.