Stratified reproduction, family planning care and the double edge of history : Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo


Stratified reproduction, family planning care and the double edge of history

Harris, Lisa H.a,b,c; Wolfe, Taidad

Author Information
Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 26(6):p 539-544, December 2014. | DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000121


Purpose of review 

There is a growing clinical consensus that Medicaid sterilization consent protections should be revisited because they impede desired care for many women. Here, we consider the broad social and ideological contexts for past sterilization abuses, beyond informed consent.

Recent findings 

Throughout the US history, the fertility and childbearing of poor women and women of color were not valued equally to those of affluent white women. This is evident in a range of practices and policies, including black women's treatment during slavery, removal of Native children to off-reservation boarding schools and coercive sterilizations of poor white women and women of color. Thus, reproductive experiences throughout the US history were stratified. This ideology of stratified reproduction persists today in social welfare programs, drug policy and programs promoting long-acting reversible contraception.


At their core, sterilization abuses reflected an ideology of stratified reproduction, in which some women's fertility was devalued compared to other women's fertility. Revisiting Medicaid sterilization regulations must therefore put issues of race, ethnicity, class, power and resources – not just informed consent – at the center of analyses.

Copyright © 2014 YEAR Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

You can read the full text of this article if you:

Access through Ovid