UrogynecologyA review of laparoscopic uterine suspension procedures for uterine preservationLin, Lawrence La; Ho, Mat Ha; Haessler, Alexandra La; Betson, Lance Ha; Alinsod, Red Mb; Liu, CYc; Bhatia, Narender NaAuthor Information aHarbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California, USA bThe Women's Center, Laguna Beach, Caliornia, USA cChattanooga Women's Laser Center, Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA Correspondence to Lawrence Lin MD, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, 1000 West Carson St., Box 489, D-3 Torrance, CA 90509, USA Tel: +1 310 222 3868; fax: +1 310 222 4149; e-mail: email@example.com Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology: October 2005 - Volume 17 - Issue 5 - p 541-546 doi: 10.1097/01.gco.0000179664.83154.9c Buy Metrics Abstract Purpose of review The most appropriate surgical approach for uterine preservation still remains the subject of ongoing controversy. Uterine suspension procedures can be performed abdominally, vaginally, or laparoscopically. This article focuses on the three different laparoscopic approaches of uterine suspension for uterine preservation: suspension to the round ligaments; suspension to the uterosacral ligaments; and suspension to the anterior ligament of the sacral promontory. This article reviews the published studies in the literature, analyzes the results, discusses the differences, and compares the different laparoscopic techniques. Recent findings A review of the literature reveals a paucity of research studies and publications on laparoscopic uterine suspension procedures. All the published studies are small, retrospective case series or case studies. Laparoscopic ventrosuspension using the round ligaments for uterine prolapse has a reported success rate of less than 50%. The ventrosuspension procedure has a very limited role and should not be employed. In comparison, laparoscopic uterine suspension procedures have a reported success rate ranging between 81 and 100%. The newest surgical technique is the laparoscopic sacral colpohysteropexy and there is only one reported case series on this procedure. The reported success rate for the sacral colpohysteropexy is 100%. Summary The first surgical option for uterine preservation is uterine suspension to the uterosacral ligaments. If the uterosacral ligaments cannot be identified or the uterosacral ligaments are weak and unusable, then laparoscopic sacral colpohysteropexy is a reliable second option. Uterine suspension to the round ligaments has an unacceptably high failure rate and is not an effective, durable alternative. © 2005 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.