Timing of initiation of dialysis: time for a new direction?Abra, Graham; Tamura, Manjula KurellaCurrent Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension: May 2012 - Volume 21 - Issue 3 - p 329–333 doi: 10.1097/MNH.0b013e328351c244 EPIDEMIOLOGY AND PREVENTION: Edited by Chi-yuan Hsu Buy Abstract Author InformationAuthors Article MetricsMetrics Purpose of review The past 15 years have seen tremendous growth in the initiation of dialysis at higher levels of kidney function in the setting of mixed evidence and at great societal economic cost. We review recent data on the early dialysis initiation trend, the clinical and economic impact of early dialysis initiation and the future implications for the management of advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). Recent findings The percentage of patients who initiate dialysis with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) above 10 ml/min/1.73m2 is now greater than 50%, including 20% who initiate with an eGFR above 15 ml/min/1.73m2. The drivers behind these findings are probably diverse but recent literature does not seem to support a higher symptom burden among the ageing CKD population as the major cause. The Initiating Dialysis Early And Late (IDEAL) trial provides guidance on the safety of waiting for symptoms or lower levels of estimated glomerular filtration rate prior to beginning dialysis. In addition, economic analyses based on the IDEAL and US Renal Data System findings suggest that significant cost savings could be achieved by reversing the early initiation trend. Summary These findings should help clinicians and policy makers looking to rein in costs while maintaining the quality of CKD care. Division of Nephrology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA Correspondence to Manjula Kurella Tamura, MD, MPH, Division of Nephrology, Stanford University, 780 Welch Rd, Suite 106, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA. Tel: +1 650 721 6617; fax: +1 650 721 1443; e-mail: email@example.com © 2012 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.