Despite recent medical advances in cholesterol management, cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a leading cause of death and disability [1,2]. As elevated levels of LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) represent a significant modifiable risk factor for CVD, hypercholesterolemia has become a primary target for lipid-lowering therapies and for reduction of the risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) [1,3,4]. Inhibition of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase with statins remains a leading therapeutic strategy to treat hypercholesterolemia and to reduce cardiovascular risk . In addition to LDL-C lowering, statins reduce high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels and to limit chronic low-grade inflammation, which often coincides with altered lipid metabolism and represents a hallmark feature of coronary artery disease [5▪,6]. Although the benefits of using statins to effectively control LDL-C and hsCRP levels and to reduce cardiovascular risk are well documented, a significant subset of patients is unable to take full advantage of statin treatment because of muscle pain or weakness, or the risk of increased blood glucose levels. Approximately 12% of patients on statins discontinue therapy, citing myalgia as the primary reason for discontinuation . More than two million adults in the USA are considered to be statin intolerant. Poor statin adherence can lead to worsening of cardiovascular outcomes and increased risk of MACE [7–9]. Recently, the Food and Drug Administration has issued a warning that statins may increase the risk of elevated blood glucose and new-onset type 2 diabetes . This regulatory warning reinforces the growing need for new therapeutic options to lower LDL-C levels in patients with hypercholesterolemia and diabetes or at risk for developing diabetes.
The present review will focus on adenosine triphosphate-citrate lyase (ACL) and adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) as promising targets for the development of novel lipid-lowering therapies designed not only to yield statin-like benefits in hypercholesterolemic patients but also to avoid side-effects associated with statin treatment. In addition to target justification, we will describe the mechanism of action [11,12] and review the most recent clinical data [13,14] for ETC-1002 (8-hydroxy-2,2,14,14 tetramethylpentadecanedioic acid) – the only dual ACL inhibitor/AMPK activator currently in Phase 2 clinical development for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia in patients with and without a history of statin intolerance or at risk of worsening glycemic control [15,16].
ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE-CITRATE LYASE AND ADENOSINE MONOPHOSPHATE-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE: THERAPEUTIC TARGET JUSTIFICATION
ACL is an extra-mitochondrial enzyme that is highly expressed in lipogenic tissues such as liver and adipose . ACL catalyzes the cleavage of mitochondrial-derived citrate to cytosolic acetyl-CoA and oxaloacetate, with acetyl-CoA serving as a common substrate for de-novo cholesterol and fatty acid synthesis [18–23]. Transcription of ACL is controlled by the sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1 (SREBP-1) which is highly responsive to nutritional status through insulin signaling and glucose metabolites [24,25]. In the lipogenic state, ACL expression and cytosolic citrate levels are elevated and serve as a critical link between glycolysis and lipid synthesis and storage. Because of its strategic position in cholesterol biosynthetic pathways, ACL inhibition is considered to be an attractive therapeutic strategy for the reduction of elevated LDL-C levels.
Inhibition of de-novo hepatic cholesterol synthesis by statins, highly potent and selective inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase, represents an effective therapeutic approach to reduce LDL-C [26–28]. The primary mechanism linking inhibition of hepatic sterol synthesis to reductions in LDL-C involves compensatory upregulation of sterol regulatory element-binding protein-2 (SREBP2)-dependent gene transcription in response to reduced intracellular cholesterol levels . Induction of SREBP-2 activity triggers a transcriptional program aimed to restore intracellular cholesterol via a concurrent increase in cholesterogenic enzymes and upregulation of LDL receptor expression . As a consequence, elevated LDL receptor activity increases the fractional catabolic rate of LDL particles in the blood, thus reducing LDL-C . Similar to the mechanism described for statins, pharmacological inhibition of ACL limits de-novo cholesterol synthesis and increases LDL receptor activity . Unlike statins, however, this occurs without direct inhibition of HMG-CoA. Furthermore, inhibition of ACL also reduces de-novo fatty acid synthesis, resulting in decreased malonyl-CoA levels, and subsequent enhancement of CPT-1-dependent mitochondrial transport of long-chain fatty acids for β-oxidation. This switch from fatty acid synthesis to β-oxidation limits the fatty acid availability for synthesis of cholesteryl esters, triglycerides, and VLDL secretion . Consequently, reduced VLDL production in response to ACL inhibition may even further contribute to LDL-C lowering because VLDL serves as the main metabolic precursor for LDL particle formation.
AMPK is a heterotrimeric complex of an α-catalytic and βγ-regulatory subunits that modulates lipid and carbohydrate metabolism, immune response, protein synthesis, and cell growth . As a key regulator of energy homeostasis [32,33], AMPK controls cellular metabolism by phosphorylating key enzymes, transcription factors, and coactivators which results in a metabolic shift from anabolic processes, including gluconeogenesis and lipid synthesis, to catabolic processes such as fatty acid β-oxidation . Although acute regulation of lipid metabolism by AMPK is linked to inhibitory phosphorylation of the rate-limiting enzymes of fatty acid and cholesterol synthesis [34–36], the more sustained control of lipid homeostasis by AMPK is mediated via transcriptional program which combines inhibition of SREBP1-dependent fatty acid synthase expression, and upregulation of mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation through the activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ coactivator 1α (PGC1α) . Similarly, the long-term regulatory role of AMPK in carbohydrate metabolism involves complex transcriptional control of the gluconeogenic enzymes phosphorenol pyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK) and glucose-6-phosphatase (G-6-Pase) [38–41]. In tandem, these acute and chronic mechanisms are expected to reverse elevated triglyceride storage, increase insulin sensitivity, and improve glycemic control in the liver .
As inception and propagation of the immune response is a highly energy-demanding process [43▪,44], AMPK activation also limits inflammation by directly suppressing the anabolic events in immune cells and restricting energy availability for protein biosynthesis [43▪,44]. This occurs largely through the complex overlapping networks of the sirtuin family of protein deacetylases, PGC1α and PGC1β, as well as mTOR signaling [43▪,44,45,46▪] and leads to transition into the Th2/M2 anti-inflammatory phenotype [47–49], inhibition of NF-kB, RelA/p65, and MAP kinase signaling, and reduced production of soluble mediators of inflammation by the immune cells [11,46▪,50,51].
ETC-1002: MECHANISM OF ACTION
ETC-1002 is a novel, small molecule, dual ACL inhibitor/AMPK activator that beneficially modulates lipid, lipoprotein and carbohydrate metabolism, and inflammation (Fig. 1). ETC-1002 was selected from a library of structural analogues based on its ability to mediate equipotent inhibition of de-novo cholesterol and fatty acid synthesis in primary hepatocytes and favorably modify serum lipid variables in obese female Zucker (fa/fa) rats .
In a series of in-vitro and in-vivo follow-up studies aimed at elucidating the underlying molecular mechanisms for equipotent inhibition of lipid synthesis, formation of ETC-1002-Coenzyme A (ETC-1002-CoA) thioester has been identified as a required step for ETC-1002-mediated inhibition of lipid synthesis . Quantitative tracking of multiple metabolic intermediates of lipid synthesis provided further insights to the point of inhibition and identified ACL as a primary target based on reduction in all metabolites downstream of ACL coupled with concomitant increase in ACL substrate – citrate. Consistently, in a cell-free assay, ETC-1002-CoA directly inhibited recombinant human ACL via competitive inhibition for coenzyme A, whereas neither ETC-1002 nor ETC-1002-CoA inhibited partially purified rat HMG-CoA reductase activity . Importantly, ETC-1002 treatment was also associated with a concentration-dependent increase in LDLR activity in vitro (Esperion's unpublished data). ETC-1002 was also shown to activate AMPK in a Ca2+/calmodulin-activated protein kinase kinase β (CaMKKβ)-independent and liver kinase β (LKB1)-dependent manner, without inducing detectable changes in adenylate energy charge (AEC). Furthermore, in primary rat hepatocytes, ETC-1002 reduced both glucagon-dependent glucose production as well as the expression of PEPCK and G-6-Pase .
In immune cells treated with ETC-1002, increased levels of AMPK phosphorylation coincided with reduced activity of JNK and p38 MAP kinases along with decreased production of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines . siRNA-mediated gene silencing confirmed that ETC-1002 activates macrophage AMPK and exerts its anti-inflammatory effects via a mechanism dependent on the LKB1/AMPK axis . Consequently, ETC-1002 diminished homing of neutrophils and macrophages into the disease site and decreased adipose mass, IL-6 release as well as macrophage presence in the inflamed tissue .
Thus, inhibition of ACL and activation of AMPK by ETC-1002 represent a unique tandem of complementary activities aimed to correct imbalances in lipid and carbohydrate metabolism. Indeed, in preclinical models of hypercholesterolemia, diet-induced and genetic models of obesity/diabetes, high-fat/high-cholesterol-fed models of atherosclerosis, and genetic models of hypertension, use of ETC-1002 has lowered LDL-C, reduced glucose/insulin levels, decreased body weight gain without altering food intake, reduced the progressive development of atherosclerotic plaques, lowered inflammatory markers linked to atherosclerosis, and reduced blood pressure [11,12]. Subsequent clinical translation of these benefits could potentially enable ETC-1002 as an alternative therapy designed to control LDL-C levels in patients with dyslipidemia and a history of statin intolerance.
ETC-1002: CLINICAL EVALUATION
ETC-1002 is the only, orally available, once-daily dual ACL inhibitor/AMPK activator currently in Phase 2b clinical development. To date, ETC-1002 has been evaluated in seven completed clinical studies (Table 1).
In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 177 patients with elevated LDL-C (130–220 mg/dl), ETC-1002 administered at 40-mg, 80-mg, and 120-mg daily significantly lowered LDL-C levels in a dose-dependent manner by −17.9 ± 2.2, −25.0 ± 2.1, and −26.6 ± 2.2%, respectively, versus a reduction of −2.1 ± 2.2% with placebo (Table 1) . Maximum LDL-C reduction was independent of baseline triglyceride levels, occurred within 2 weeks of treatment, and was maintained for the remaining 10 weeks of the study . LDL-C lowering was accompanied by reductions in non-high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (non-HDL-C), apoB, and LDL particle number at all doses. A post-hoc analysis revealed reductions in plasma levels of hsCRP of up to 63.5% versus a 7% reduction with placebo in patients with elevated hsCRP levels (≥2 mg/l) at baseline .
Type 2 diabetes
A single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled, in-clinic study evaluated the efficacy of ETC-1002 in 60 patients with type 2 diabetes and elevated LDL-C . Patients discontinued all diabetes and lipid-regulating drugs and were randomized to receive ETC-1002 80 mg for 2 weeks followed by 120 mg daily for an additional 2 weeks or placebo for 4 weeks . At the end of the study, LDL-C was reduced by 43% in the ETC-1002 group compared with 11% in the placebo group . Reductions in LDL-C levels occurred across a broad range of baseline LDL-C and triglyceride values. The ETC-1002-treated group also showed significant reductions in non-HDL-C and total cholesterol. In addition, ETC-1002 treatment lowered hsCRP by 41% compared with 11% with placebo . Importantly, ETC-1002 treatment did not result in a worsening of glycemic control. A nonsignificant reduction of all prespecified glycemic markers was observed with ETC-1002 treatment compared with placebo . A post-hoc analysis of a subgroup of patients with mild elevations in blood pressure, showed that treatment with ETC-1002 decreased both systolic and diastolic blood pressure by −2.4 and −7.3 mm Hg, respectively, compared with placebo .
A proof-of-concept clinical study was designed to evaluate LDL-C lowering by ETC-1002 in patients with hypercholesterolemia and a history of intolerance to two or more statins. A total of 56 patients were evaluated in this study. Three patients in the placebo group withdrew from the study because of muscle-related adverse events, whereas no patients in the ETC-1002 group withdrew for these reasons (Table 2). ETC-1002 lowered LDL-C by an average of 32% compared with an LDL-C reduction of 3% in the placebo group. Consistent with previous studies, hsCRP was also significantly reduced by 42% after 8 weeks of ETC-1002 therapy (Esperion's unpublished results).
A multicenter study was designed to evaluate ETC-1002 for 8 weeks in patients with hypercholesterolemia receiving 10 mg of atorvastatin. In this study, ETC-1002 demonstrated incremental LDL-C lowering of up to 22% when added to atorvastatin and was well tolerated (Esperion's unpublished results).
ETC-1002 was generally safe and well tolerated in all seven clinical studies. Adverse event rates were comparable between the ETC-1002 and placebo groups (Table 3). No drug-related serious adverse events have been observed in patients treated with ETC-1002 [13,14].
With the recently added regulatory warnings, it has become increasingly clear that a significant subset of patients is unable to take full advantage of statin treatment because of muscle pain or weakness and a risk of increased blood glucose levels. In contrast, modulation of ACL and AMPK offers an innovative alternative to standard-of-care lipid management that may address the growing need for new therapeutic options for hypercholesterolemic patients with and without a history of statin intolerance or at risk of worsening glycemic control.
The authors thank their colleagues for insightful suggestions and critical review of the manuscript.
All authors are employees of Esperion Therapeutics Inc.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES AND RECOMMENDED READING
Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:
- ▪ of special interest
- ▪▪ of outstanding interest
1. Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2013; 127:e6–e245.
2. Heidenreich PA, Trogdon JG, Khavjou OA, et al. Forecasting the future of cardiovascular disease in the United States: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2011; 123:933–944.
3. Lewis SJ. Lipid-lowering therapy: who can benefit? Vasc Health Risk Manag 2011; 7:525–534.
4. Nelson RH. Hyperlipidemia as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Prim Care 2013; 40:195–211.
5▪. Libby P. Mechanisms of acute coronary syndromes and their implications for therapy. N Engl J Med 2013; 368:2004–2013.
This review summarizes current understanding of the mechanisms underlying transition from stable ischemic heart disease or asymptomatic atherosclerosis to acute coronary syndromes.
6. Libby P, Lichtman AH, Hansson GK. Immune effector mechanisms implicated in atherosclerosis: from mice to humans. Immunity 2013; 38:1092–1104.
7. Cohen JD, Brinton EA, Ito MK, Jacobson TA. Understanding Statin Use in America and Gaps in Patient Education (USAGE): an internet-based survey of 10,138 current and former statin users. J Clin Lipidol 2012; 6:208–215.
8. Maningat P, Breslow JL. Needed: pragmatic clinical trials for statin-intolerant patients. N Engl J Med 2011; 365:2250–2251.
9. Brown MT, Bussell JK. Medication adherence: WHO cares? Mayo Clin Proc 2011; 86:304–314.
11. Filippov S, Pinkosky SL, Lister RJ, et al. ETC-1002 regulates immune response, leukocyte homing, and adipose tissue inflammation via LKB1-dependent activation of macrophage AMPK. J Lipid Res 2013; 54:2095–2108.
12. Pinkosky SL, Filippov S, Srivastava AR, et al. AMP-activated protein kinase and ATP-citrate lyase are two distinct molecular targets for ETC-1002-a novel small molecule regulator of lipid and carbohydrate metabolism. J Lipid Res 2013; 54:134–151.
13. Ballantyne CM, Davidson MH, Macdougall DE, et al. Efficacy and safety of a novel dual modulator of adenosine triphosphate-citrate lyase and adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase in patients with hypercholesterolemia: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62:1154–1162.
14. Gutierrez MJ, Rosenberg NL, Macdougall DE, et al. Efficacy and safety of ETC-1002, a novel investigational low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol-lowering therapy for the treatment of patients with hypercholesterolemia and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2014; 34:676–683.
15. Norata GD, Ballantyne CM, Catapano AL. New therapeutic principles in dyslipidaemia: focus on LDL and Lp(a) lowering drugs. Eur Heart J 2013; 34:1783–1789.
16. Kane JP. New horizons in lipid management. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62:1163–1164.
17. Elshourbagy NA, Near JC, Kmetz PJ, et al. Rat ATP citrate-lyase. Molecular cloning and sequence analysis of a full-length cDNA and mRNA abundance as a function of diet, organ, and age. J Biol Chem 1990; 265:1430–1435.
18. Pearce NJ, Yates JW, Berkhout TA, et al. The role of ATP citrate-lyase in the metabolic regulation of plasma lipids. Hypolipidaemic effects of SB-204990, a lactone prodrug of the potent ATP citrate-lyase inhibitor SB-201076. Biochem J 1998; 334 (Pt 1):113–119.
19. Chu KY, Lin Y, Hendel A, et al. ATP-citrate lyase reduction mediates palmitate-induced apoptosis in pancreatic beta cells. J Biol Chem 2010; 285:32606–32615.
20. Gribble AD, Ife RJ, Shaw A, et al. ATP-citrate lyase as a target for hypolipidemic intervention. 2. Synthesis and evaluation of (3R,5S)-omega-substituted-3-carboxy-3, 5-dihydroxyalkanoic acids and their gamma-lactone prodrugs as inhibitors of the enzyme in vitro and in vivo. J Med Chem 1998; 41:3582–3595.
21. Kanao T, Fukui T, Atomi H, Imanaka T. Kinetic and biochemical analyses on the reaction mechanism of a bacterial ATP-citrate lyase. Eur J Biochem 2002; 269:3409–3416.
22. Lim K, Ryu S, Suh H, et al. (-)-Hydroxycitrate ingestion and endurance exercise performance. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo) 2005; 51:1–7.
23. Melnick JZ, Srere PA, Elshourbagy NA, et al. Adenosine triphosphate citrate lyase mediates hypocitraturia in rats. J Clin Invest 1996; 98:2381–2387.
24. Kim KS, Kang JG, Moon YA, et al. Regulation of ATP-citrate lyase gene transcription. Yonsei Med J 1996; 37:214–224.
25. Park SW, Kim KS, Whang SK, et al. Induction of hepatic ATP-citrate lyase by insulin in diabetic rat – effects of insulin on the contents of enzyme and its mRNA in cytosol, and the transcriptional activity in nuclei. Yonsei Med J 1994; 35:25–33.
26. Cannon CP, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, et al. Intensive versus moderate lipid lowering with statins after acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2004; 350:1495–1504.
27. Fonarow GC, Watson KE. Effective strategies for long-term statin use. Am J Cardiol 2003; 92:27i–34i.
28. Kastelein JJ. The future of lipid-lowering therapy: the big picture. Neth J Med 2003; 61:35–39.
29. Kovanen PT, Bilheimer DW, Goldstein JL, et al. Regulatory role for hepatic low density lipoprotein receptors in vivo in the dog. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1981; 78:1194–1198.
30. Berkhout TA, Havekes LM, Pearce NJ, Groot PH. The effect of (−)-hydroxycitrate on the activity of the low-density-lipoprotein receptor and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase levels in the human hepatoma cell line Hep G2. Biochem J 1990; 272:181–186.
31. Steinberg GR, Kemp BE. AMPK in health and disease. Physiol Rev 2009; 89:1025–1078.
32. Hardie DG. AMP-activated/SNF1 protein kinases: conserved guardians of cellular energy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007; 8:774–785.
33. Steinberg GR, Macaulay SL, Febbraio MA, Kemp BE. AMP-activated protein kinase – the fat controller of the energy railroad. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 2006; 84:655–665.
34. Carlson CA, Kim KH. Regulation of hepatic acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase by phosphorylation and dephosphorylation. J Biol Chem 1973; 248:378–380.
35. Saggerson D. Malonyl-CoA, a key signaling molecule in mammalian cells. Annu Rev Nutr 2008; 28:253–272.
36. Beg ZH, Stonik JA, Brewer HB Jr. Modulation of the enzymic activity of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase by multiple kinase systems involving reversible phosphorylation: a review. Metabolism 1987; 36:900–917.
37. Lin J, Handschin C, Spiegelman BM. Metabolic control through the PGC-1 family of transcription coactivators. Cell Metab 2005; 1:361–370.
38. Yoon JC, Puigserver P, Chen G, et al. Control of hepatic gluconeogenesis through the transcriptional coactivator PGC-1. Nature 2001; 413:131–138.
39. Puigserver P, Rhee J, Donovan J, et al. Insulin-regulated hepatic gluconeogenesis through FOXO1-PGC-1alpha interaction. Nature 2003; 423:550–555.
40. Leclerc I, Lenzner C, Gourdon L, et al. Hepatocyte nuclear factor-4alpha involved in type 1 maturity-onset diabetes of the young is a novel target of AMP-activated protein kinase. Diabetes 2001; 50:1515–1521.
41. Hong YH, Varanasi US, Yang W, Leff T. AMP-activated protein kinase regulates HNF4alpha transcriptional activity by inhibiting dimer formation and decreasing protein stability. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:27495–27501.
42. Lowell BB, Shulman GI. Mitochondrial dysfunction and type 2 diabetes. Science 2005; 307:384–387.
43▪. O’Neill LA, Hardie DG. Metabolism of inflammation limited by AMPK and pseudo-starvation. Nature 2013; 493:346–355.
A comprehensive review of the current literature on mechanisms of metabolic changes in immune cells and a role of AMPK in regulation of immune response.
44. Liu TF, Brown CM, El Gazzar M, et al. Fueling the flame: bioenergy couples metabolism and inflammation. J Leukoc Biol 2012; 92:499–507.
45. Blagih J, Krawczyk CM, Jones RG. LKB1 and AMPK: central regulators of lymphocyte metabolism and function. Immunol Rev 2012; 249:59–71.
46▪. Fullerton MD, Steinberg GR, Schertzer JD. Immunometabolism of AMPK in insulin resistance and atherosclerosis. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2012; 366:224–234.
This review highlights recent evidence linking AMPK function to metabolic diseases including insulin resistance and atherosclerosis.
47. Mounier R, Theret M, Arnold L, et al. AMPKalpha1 regulates macrophage skewing at the time of resolution of inflammation during skeletal muscle regeneration. Cell Metab 2013; 18:251–264.
48. Galic S, Fullerton MD, Schertzer JD, et al. Hematopoietic AMPK beta1 reduces mouse adipose tissue macrophage inflammation and insulin resistance in obesity. J Clin Invest 2011; 121:4903–4915.
49. Carroll KC, Viollet B, Suttles J. AMPKalpha1 deficiency amplifies proinflammatory myeloid APC activity and CD40 signaling. J Leukoc Biol 2013; 94:1113–1121.
50. Kauppinen A, Suuronen T, Ojala J, et al. Antagonistic crosstalk between NF-kappaB and SIRT1 in the regulation of inflammation and metabolic disorders. Cell Signal 2013; 25:1939–1948.
51. Salminen A, Hyttinen JM, Kaarniranta K. AMP-activated protein kinase inhibits NF-kappaB signaling and inflammation: impact on healthspan and lifespan. J Mol Med (Berl) 2011; 89:667–676.
52. Cramer CT, Goetz B, Hopson KL, et al. Effects of a novel dual lipid synthesis inhibitor and its potential utility in treating dyslipidemia and metabolic syndrome. J Lipid Res 2004; 45:1289–1301.