Secondary Logo

Share this article on:

The tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome

recent advances in clinical and pathogenesis research

Walker, Naomi F.a; Stek, Carib,c,d; Wasserman, Seanb,d; Wilkinson, Robert J.b,d,e,f; Meintjes, Graemeb,d

Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS: November 2018 - Volume 13 - Issue 6 - p 512–521
doi: 10.1097/COH.0000000000000502
TUBERCULOSIS AND HIV: Edited by Richard E. Chaisson and Haileyesus Getahun

Purpose of review Antiretroviral therapy (ART) is an essential, life-saving intervention for HIV infection. However, ART initiation is frequently complicated by the tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (TB-IRIS) in TB endemic settings. Here, we summarize the current understanding highlighting the recent evidence.

Recent findings The incidence of paradoxical TB-IRIS is estimated at 18% (95% CI 16–21%), higher than previously reported and may be over 50% in high-risk groups. Early ART initiation in TB patients increases TB-IRIS risk by greater than two-fold, but is critical in TB patients with CD4 counts less than 50 cells/μl because it improves survival. There remains no validated diagnostic test for TB-IRIS, and biomarkers recently proposed are not routinely used. Prednisone initiated alongside ART in selected patients with CD4 less than 100 cells/μl reduced the risk of paradoxical TB-IRIS by 30% in a recent randomized-controlled trial (RCT) and was not associated with significant adverse effects. Effective also for treating paradoxical TB-IRIS, corticosteroids remain the only therapeutic intervention for TB-IRIS supported by RCT trial data. TB-IRIS pathogenesis studies implicate high antigen burden, innate immune cell cytotoxicity, inflammasome activation and dysregulated matrix metalloproteinases in the development of the condition.

Summary Specific biomarkers would aid in identifying high-risk patients for interventions and a diagnostic test is needed. Clinicians should consider prednisone for TB-IRIS prevention in selected patients. Future research should focus on improving diagnosis and investigating novel therapeutic interventions, especially for patients in whom corticosteroid therapy is contraindicated.

aDepartment of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

bWellcome Centre for Infectious Diseases Research in Africa, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

cDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium

dDepartment of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

eDepartment of Medicine, Imperial College London

fFrancis Crick Institute, London, UK

Correspondence to Naomi F. Walker, NIHR Academic Clinical Lecturer, Department of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK. Tel: +44 (0) 2076368636; e-mail: naomi.walker@lshtm.ac.uk

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Back to Top | Article Outline

INTRODUCTION

HIV-associated TB is common, with an estimated 1.4 million cases and 374 000 deaths annually [1]. In parts of sub-Saharan Africa, around 60% of TB patients are HIV coinfected [1]. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) is an essential, life-saving intervention for HIV, but HIV-infected patients starting ART are at high risk of tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (TB-IRIS) in TB endemic settings. TB-IRIS is an acute inflammatory condition that presents with worsening, or development of new, tuberculosis disease in a patient already on TB treatment after starting ART (paradoxical TB-IRIS), or a new diagnosis of TB with a particularly acute, inflammatory presentation after starting ART (unmasking TB-IRIS). Rapid restoration of immunity after ART, with exaggerated inflammatory responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) antigens, underlies this condition although the pathophysiology is incompletely understood.

In a systematic review, Namale et al. [2] collated studies published before 3 May 2014 reporting incidence, clinical features, management and outcomes of paradoxical TB-IRIS, including 40 studies, 7789 patients at risk and 1048 TB-IRIS cases. Studies were from Africa, Asia, Europe, North and South America. Here, we discuss key findings in subsequently published literature, on TB-IRIS epidemiology, outcomes, management, prevention, diagnosis and pathogenesis. We focus on paradoxical TB-IRIS, the most common form of HIV-associated IRIS and most frequently studied. Unmasking TB-IRIS is discussed in a separate section. Knowledge to date, with reference to key review articles and recent original research articles, is summarized in Table 1 [2,3,4–6,7,8,9,10,11,12▪▪].

Table 1

Table 1

Box 1

Box 1

Back to Top | Article Outline

DEFINITIONS

As there are no validated diagnostic tests for TB-IRIS, diagnosis is clinical. The International Network for the Study of HIV-associated IRIS (INSHI) consensus definitions of paradoxical and unmasking TB-IRIS are the most commonly used and have been validated [13,14]. The Aids Clinical Trials Group definition (see https://actgnetwork.org/IRIS_Case_Definitions) and IMPAACT trial definition (see https://www.impaactnetwork.org for Adolescent and Paediatric cohorts) have been used in research settings. The schematic in Fig. 1 summarizes the different terms used and the relationship to TB treatment and ART initiation. The case definitions provide subclassification into confirmed and probable paradoxical TB-IRIS according to the extent in which other possible causes of symptoms have been adequately excluded. ART-associated TB is a broad term that encompasses new TB diagnoses in patients who have recently commenced ART, including unmasking TB-IRIS, with the recognition that new TB diagnoses are frequently made in patients who have recently commenced ART but not all have the features of unmasking IRIS [13]. Two illustrative cases of paradoxical TB-IRIS cases are presented in Fig. 2.

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 2

FIGURE 2

Back to Top | Article Outline

PARADOXICAL TUBERCULOSIS-ASSOCIATED IMMUNE RECONSTITUTION INFLAMMATORY SYNDROME

Incidence and risk factors

Recently reported cohort studies of adult patients in Africa and India have demonstrated high TB-IRIS incidence rates (19–57%) with the highest rates in patients with low CD4 counts [3▪,15–17]. A study of HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected patients with TB meningitis in India reported paradoxical reactions in 11 of 13 (84.6%) HIV-infected patients, but did not report on the temporal relationship to ART initiation [18]. A recent cohort study of 104 South African children was the first to prospectively study paradoxical TB-IRIS in children concluding that the incidence of paradoxical TB-IRIS in children was low. Paradoxical TB-IRIS occurred in 7 of 104 (6.7%) children studied [4]. A recent trial of urgent (<48 h) versus poststabilization (7–14 days) ART initiation in hospitalized children in Kenya reported IRIS incidence as a primary outcome measure, using IMPAACT definitions of IRIS. A total of 27 of 179 children had a diagnosis of suspected TB at enrolment and nine children were on TB treatment at enrolment. Eighteen patients had suspected TB-IRIS during 6 months follow up, although it is not stated whether these were unmasking or paradoxical TB-IRIS [19].

Baseline low CD4 count and high HIV viral load have been associated with an increased risk of TB-IRIS in prospective studies, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the optimal time for ART initiation in HIV [2]. The most recently published was a study of 478 patients in Ethiopia, starting ART at 1, 4 or 8 weeks of TB treatment, powered for mortality outcome at 48 weeks. No survival benefit was evident with ART initiation at week 1 and TB-IRIS was more frequent in patients with early versus later ART initiation, with an incidence of 15 (95% CI 9–24), 5 (95% CI 2.3–11.7) and 0 per 100 person years in those who commenced ART at 1, 4 and 8 weeks, respectively (P = 0.001) tuberculosis therapy in patients with CD4 counts < 200 cells/muL: TB-HAART study, a randomized clinical trial. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0122587.','400');" onMouseOut="javascript:ImageWrapperControl_ImageMouseOut();">[20].

Two meta-analyses of RCTs on the optimal time to initiate ART following commencement of TB treatment in HIV-associated TB have reported combined relative risks of TB-IRIS of 2.19 (95% CI 1.77–2.70) and 2.31 (95% CI 1.87–2.86) for early (up to 4 weeks) versus late (8–12 weeks) ART initiation [5,6]. In patients with a CD4 count below 50 cells/mm3, a mortality benefit was apparent with early ART, favouring ART initiation within 2 weeks following TB treatment in such patients. However, a relatively high incidence of TB-IRIS can be expected in these patients who commence ART at 2 weeks of antituberculous therapy – the risk was elevated over two-fold with early ART.

Our cohort study followed 47 TB patients (with baseline CD4 < 200 cells/μl) commencing ART, investigating immunopathology caused by matrix metalloproteinases [3▪]. The incidence of paradoxical TB-IRIS was 57%. Patients who went on to develop TB-IRIS had higher plasma MMP-8 and procollagen III N-terminal propeptide (PIIINP, a matrix degradation product released during collagen turnover) and evidence of an increased systemic inflammatory response (higher heart rates and higher respiratory rates) but lower lymphocyte counts, at TB diagnosis, compared to those who did not develop TB-IRIS. Urine lipoarabinomannan (LAM, a marker of renal TB indicating disseminated infection in patients with advanced HIV) was more often positive in TB-IRIS patients (adjusted odds ratio = 10.9). Marais et al. [7▪] reported increased proportions of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture positivity and persistently positive CSF cultures in patients who developed TBM-IRIS relative to those who did not. However, a recent study of 90 patients with baseline CD4 count less than 250 cells/mm3, starting ART, nested within an RCT of early versus late ART, did not find an association between positive blood cultures for TB and TB IRIS diagnosis [21].

The question of whether integrase inhibitors increase the risk of paradoxical TB-IRIS as they result in a more rapid decline in HIV viral load has arisen with increasing use of integrase inhibitors in first-line ART regimens. Observational studies have reported an association with all-cause IRIS [22,23]. A recent meta-analysis addressing Dolutegravir use did not find an association with IRIS [24]. Clinical trials have not demonstrated an increased risk of TB-IRIS [25,26]. This question is being further addressed in ongoing trials.

In summary, paradoxical TB-IRIS frequently complicates ART initiation in HIV-associated TB, with a high incidence in selected patients. More advanced immunosuppression, more inflammatory TB presentation, disseminated TB and persistent culture positivity, and a shorter time to ART initiation from TB treatment have all been associated with increased TB-IRIS risk and together suggest that increased mycobacterial burden permitted by advanced immunosuppression is causally associated with the development of TB-IRIS.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Outcomes

Overall mortality from paradoxical TB-IRIS appears to be relatively low but may be confounded by underdiagnosis and lack of reporting [2]. Recent cohort studies have reported few or no deaths due to TB-IRIS. The most recently published RCT of timing of ART initiation in TB patients reported only one TB-IRIS case among 64 deaths tuberculosis therapy in patients with CD4 counts < 200 cells/muL: TB-HAART study, a randomized clinical trial. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0122587.','400');" onMouseOut="javascript:ImageWrapperControl_ImageMouseOut();">[20]. However, in a pooled analysis of RCTs that reported TB-IRIS events, the estimated relative risk of death from paradoxical TB-IRIS in early ART arms versus late arms was 6.94 (95% CI 1.26–38.22) with an event rate of 0.78% (9 of 1153 cases) in the early arms versus 0 of 1119 in the late arms [5]. Central nervous system TB-IRIS carries a particularly high mortality risk, up to 30% [7▪,8]. In our cohort study of 47 patients, hospital admission was required in 13 of 29 (45%) TB-IRIS patients compared to 1 of 18 (6%) non-IRIS controls (P = 0.007) [3▪]. There were no deaths from TB-IRIS in this study, performed in an experienced research centre with close clinical monitoring.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers

In a prospective observational study of 170 TB patients with CD4 counts less than 125 cells/μl, starting ART in Botswana, 33 (19%) patients developed paradoxical TB-IRIS and 18 (11%) patients died, but there was only one (3%) death among TB-IRIS patients, reported as occurring after the resolution of TB-IRIS symptoms [17]. This study evaluated 26 biomarkers in plasma by Luminex, in baseline pre-ART samples with respect to an eventual diagnosis of paradoxical TB-IRIS or death. Lower growth factor and Th1 cytokine responses, and lower concentrations of the proinflammatory cytokine interleukin-17 (IL-17) were associated with TB-IRIS, whereas higher baseline proinflammatory cytokines, tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6, in addition to MCP-1 and EOTAXIN, were associated with death, suggesting different pathophysiological mechanisms leading to TB-IRIS and early mortality due to TB, following ART initiation.

A study of 267 patients nested within the CADIRIS trial evaluated 20 biomarkers at ART baseline to investigate an association with all-cause IRIS [27]. There were 62 IRIS cases diagnosed using ACTG definitions, of which 19 (34%) were TB-IRIS (14 paradoxical, five unmasking). TB-IRIS was associated with a distinct biosignature comprising elevated C-reactive protein, soluble CD14 and interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and lower haemoglobin. These factors were combined into a score that allowed prediction of TB-IRIS versus no-IRIS with a sensitivity of 71.4% (0.52–88.7) and a specificity of 73.2% (57.1–85.9).

A Malaysian study comparing a combined group of patients with paradoxical and unmasking TB-IRIS (n = 15) to controls with TB but no IRIS (n = 14) and those without TB or IRIS (n = 15), using INSHI definitions, found elevated IL-18 and CXCL-10 levels prior to ART to be predictive of TB-IRIS [28]. In a validation cohort in India, baseline IL-18 predicted paradoxical TB-IRIS with an AUC = 0.742, P = 0.004 (no confidence intervals reported) [28]. One study investigated the predictive value of antigen-specific cytokine responses for TB-IRIS prediction and found it to be of little value [29].

Back to Top | Article Outline

Management

Management of paradoxical TB-IRIS includes investigations to rule out other diagnoses (e.g. sepsis), supportive management (e.g. IV fluids for hypotension), symptomatic treatment (e.g. analgesia and antiemetics), surgical or percutaneous interventions (e.g. abscess drainage) and inhibition of excessive immune responses (corticosteroids). It is critical to exclude drug-resistant TB, which is an important cause of clinical deterioration in HIV-associated TB, and which can manifest with TB-IRIS features that are clinically indistinguishable from IRIS seen in drug-sensitive TB [30]. ART interruption is not recommended.

Corticosteroids remain the only treatment for paradoxical TB-IRIS whose use is supported by RCT data [11]. Other immunomodulatory therapies have been the explored in case reports and case series including several reports of anti-TNF-α therapy, and one report of intravitreal anti-VEGF (Bevacivumab) therapy in ocular TB-IRIS [31–34]. Prednisone is not licensed for the treatment of TB-IRIS and other immunotherapies are investigational.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Prevention

Two double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled studies have assessed strategies to prevent TB-IRIS in adults. The CADIRIS study assessed the efficacy of the CCR5 blocker maraviroc in reducing all-cause IRIS, including TB-IRIS, in patients with CD4 count less than 100 cells/μl [35]. Time to an IRIS event by 24 weeks was the primary outcome. No difference in proportion of TB-IRIS was found between the maraviroc and the placebo arm.

The PredART trial assessed the efficacy and safety of prophylactic prednisone in preventing TB-IRIS in patients who were identified as being at high risk for paradoxical TB-IRIS [12▪▪]. Inclusion criteria included CD4 count less than 100 cells/μl, microbiologically confirmed TB or clinical diagnosis with symptomatic response to antituberculosis treatment, and starting ART within 30 days after starting antituberculosis treatment [12▪▪]. Exclusion criteria included Kaposi's sarcoma, neurological or pericardial tuberculosis, rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis and hepatitis B surface antigen positivity. The primary endpoint was the development of paradoxical TB-IRIS (according to the INSHI consensus definition) within 12 weeks after starting ART adjudicated by an independent committee. Two hundred and forty participants were randomized 1 : 1 to receive either prednisone (40 mg daily for 2 weeks, followed by 20 mg daily for 2 weeks) or identical placebo within 48 h of starting ART. Prophylactic prednisone reduced the risk of paradoxical TB-IRIS by 30% (56 of 120 in the placebo arm versus 39 of 120 in the prednisone arm), corresponding with an absolute reduction in incidence of 14.2%.

Prednisone was safe, with no statistically significant difference in grade 4 adverse events, severe infections, malignancies, death, corticosteroids side-effects or immunological and virological outcomes at week 12, between the prednisone and the placebo arm. There did not appear to be ‘breakthrough cases’ when the 28-day course of prednisone was stopped. Prednisone also reduced the incidence of more severe TB-IRIS, judged from the number of patients with TB-IRIS fulfilling at least one INSHI major criterion or prescribed prednisone treatment of TB-IRIS; proportions for both of these secondary outcomes were also reduced in the prednisone arm.

Further study is required to conclude whether prednisone would benefit patients not included by the enrolment criteria. Prednisone is neither licensed for treatment nor prevention of TB-IRIS. However, based on this result, we recommend that preventive treatment with prednisone, at the doses above, for HIV-infected TB patients with a CD4 nadir less than 100 cells/μl, who have had hepatitis B and Kaposi's sarcoma excluded, who are not diagnosed with rifampicin-resistant TB and who are symptomatically improving on TB treatment prior to ART. A similar recommendation has been included in the 2017 European AIDS Clinical Society guidelines [36].

Back to Top | Article Outline

Pathogenesis

Recent evidence has implicated exaggerated cytotoxic responses, excessive proinflammatory innate immune responses mediated by inflammasome activation and MMP-driven tissue damage in TB-IRIS pathogenesis. These processes are likely to be inter-related. A detailed review of the pathogenesis of TB-IRIS is beyond the scope of this review. However, here we detail key recent studies that have enhanced our understanding.

We investigated transcription profiles of Mtb-stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells of TB-IRIS and controls who did not develop TB-IRIS, finding cytotoxic mediators perforin and granzyme B to be among the top differentially regulated genes [37]. Correspondingly granzyme B was increased in serum of TB-IRIS patients but reduced in prednisone-treated patients. We found elevated CD3 + Vα24+ cell populations in TB-IRIS patients suggesting that natural killer T cells may play a role in TB-IRIS. A previous report found that increased natural killer (NK) cell degranulation predicted TB-IRIS and together these studies support a role for aberrant cytotoxic responses [38]. Further studies exploring the clinical implications of these findings are required.

Lai et al. [39] performed transcriptomic analysis of whole blood from 17 TB-IRIS patients and 15 non-IRIS controls in a longitudinal study, pre-ART, at 0.5 weeks post-ART initiation and at 2 weeks post-ART initiation (time of IRIS onset). The early pre-IRIS transcriptomic signature on ART in patients who developed TB-IRIS was enriched for genes associated with innate immunity, including the JAK family of kinases involved in IL-6 signalling pathways, interferon signalling, pattern recognition receptors and macrophage function. At the time of TB-IRIS onset, TLR receptor, TREM-1 signalling and the role of pattern recognition receptors in recognition of bacteria and viruses were among the most upregulated pathways indicating innate immune function to be at the centre of divergent immune responses. This was validated by plasma measurement of cytokines at the time of TB-IRIS onset: IL-12p40, IL-6, TNF-α and IFN-γ were found to be significantly increased compared to non-IRIS controls. Increased IL-1β, IL-1α, caspase-1 and caspase-5 secretion from heat-killed H37Rv Mtb-stimulated PBMC from TB-IRIS patients compared to non-IRIS controls suggested increased inflammasome activation in TB-IRIS.

Excessive MMP activity is implicated in inflammatory disease in TB-IRIS and may be corticosteroid modulated [40]. In our recent study, plasma MMP-8 (neutrophil collagenase) was most significantly elevated in TB-IRIS patients, at TB diagnosis and at the time of TB-IRIS onset, compared to controls [3▪]. Plasma MMP-8 correlated with peripheral blood neutrophil count, suggesting that it may be neutrophil-derived. PIIINP was elevated in TB-IRIS patients at TB diagnosis and at the time of TB-IRIS. The previously described Botswanan cohort study found increases in plasma MMP-8 on ART to be associated with TB-IRIS, and abnormal pulmonary function following TB treatment, although intervention studies are required to prove a causal link [16].

Neutrophils are elevated, activated and found at the site of caseous necrosis in human TB-IRIS [10▪]. In transcriptional analysis of unstimulated PBMC from TB-IRIS patients, the most upregulated transcripts in TB-IRIS patients versus controls implicated increased neutrophil activity (S100A9, NLRP12, COX-1 and IL-10), and this was supported by elevated neutrophil elastase and human neutrophil peptides 1–3 in plasma of TB-IRIS patients. These data suggest that neutrophil influx to the site of disease, activation and early cell death occur in TB-IRIS patients leading to local necrosis and tissue destruction.

In the context of advanced HIV-1 and Mtb infection, impaired Mtb antigen presentation by antigen presenting cells may permit excessive mycobacterial replication pre-ART. This may be contributed to by direct effects of the HIV-1 virus and poor T-cell help. Differential recovery of T-cell subsets, particularly with respect to activation and memory cell responses, has been associated with TB-IRIS [41,42]. However, the studies described above highlight the critical role for early innate immune responses in the excessive inflammation underlying TB-IRIS. Inflammasome activation and MMP activity are potential targets for future host-directed therapies.

Back to Top | Article Outline

UNMASKING TUBERCULOSIS-ASSOCIATED IMMUNE RECONSTITUTION INFLAMMATORY SYNDROME

Although ART has a major impact on reducing the risk of TB in HIV-infected individuals, TB remains the most frequently diagnosed opportunistic infection after ART initiation, particularly in high TB burden settings. The risk of developing TB is highest within the first 3 months after starting ART [43]. There may be delayed immune recovery after initiation of ART, increasing the period of high risk for HIV-associated TB. In addition, there may be subclinical TB (sputum culture positivity in asymptomatic individuals), prevalent in resource-limited settings such as sub-Saharan Africa where current screening tools perform suboptimally for active case finding [44,45]. Thus, a substantial number of patients, and particularly those with more advanced immunodeficiency, are at high risk for active TB after the initiation of ART because of both failure of diagnosis of prevalent TB prior to starting ART and ongoing persistent immune defects. The diagnosis of ‘unmasking TB-IRIS’ is reserved for a subgroup of patients with ART-associated TB who manifest an acute inflammatory form of TB following ART initiation (see Fig. 1 and definitions given above) [46].

In the absence of specific diagnostic tests and a robust clinical case definition to distinguish unmasking TB-IRIS from other forms of ART-associated TB, there are limited published data on its clinical manifestations. The reported incidence of unmasking TB-IRIS in South Africa and Uganda ranges between ∼1 and 6% [47–50]. In a large prospective study in Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa, unmasking TB-IRIS occurred in 19 out of 498 (3.8%) patients at a median of 12 days (IQR 7–49) after initiating ART [48]. This timing is consistent with other studies, where the onset has ranged between 4 and 79 days [47,51]. The clinical phenotype has been most frequently characterized by lymphadenitis, abscess formation (including in the central nervous system), serositis and pulmonary infiltration [47,50,51]. In the Kwazulu-Natal cohort, 3 of 25 (12%) deaths and 7 of 65 (11%) hospitalizations were attributed to unmasking TB-IRIS [48]. Risk factors identified for unmasking TB-IRIS include more advanced immunosuppression, a more pronounced response to ART (greater decline in HIV viral load and larger increase in CD4 cells), intrathoracic adenopathy on pre-ART chest radiograph, anaemia, weight loss, low BMI and elevated C-reactive protein [47,48,51].

Investigations to confirm the diagnosis of TB should be undertaken in all cases of suspected ART-associated TB, including drug susceptibility testing. It is important to exclude other causes of clinical deterioration on ART, such as other opportunistic infections and malignancies, and adverse drug reactions. There is no specific therapeutic intervention for unmasking TB-IRIS, but continuing ART, providing symptomatic treatments alongside antituberculous therapy and managing complications are key to management [51]. Paradoxical reactions may complicate the clinical course of patients with unmasking TB-IRIS after they have commenced TB treatment [52]. The routine use of corticosteroids is not recommended, but sometimes corticosteroids are used if there are severe inflammatory manifestations. There is no clinical trial evidence to support this strategy.

Despite having similar clinical presentations, there is some suggestion that the immunopathology associated with unmasking TB-IRIS may differ from the better-characterized paradoxical form. In one recent study, transcriptomic profiling of TST biopsies from three patients with unmasking TB-IRIS showed increased expression of genes in the Th2 pathway compared to both HIV-negative and HIV-positive controls without TB-IRIS. These findings were supported by increased transcriptional expression and immunostaining of interferon regulatory factor 4, which has been associated with Th2 responses [53]. Similarly to paradoxical TB-IRIS where the primacy of Th1 responses has been questioned, another study reporting a well-characterized patient with unmasking TB-IRIS showed that tuberculin-specific Th1 responses became expanded only after resolution of IRIS symptoms, and that there was a distorted balance of T-cell phenotypes favouring the central memory T-cell compartment prior to IRIS onset [54]. The role of innate immune effectors, including NK cells, in the pathogenesis of unmasking TB-IRIS has also been highlighted [55]. Additional investigations into the immunological mechanisms are needed, particularly with regard to the role of the innate immune response and the inflammasome, to identify potential predictors and therapeutic targets for unmasking TB-IRIS [9].

Back to Top | Article Outline

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Major insights into TB-IRIS pathogenesis have come from human observational studies with ex-vivo analysis of immune parameters. An appropriate animal model has been lacking, although a mouse model of MAI IRIS has been used [56]. A macaque SIV-Mtb coinfection model using detailed PET-CT imaging to study early immunological changes in the lung is providing useful pathophysiological insights into early HIV-TB coinfection events [57,58]. This model could in future aid in the study of TB-IRIS, particularly in attributing causality to immune mediators and pathways associated with TB-IRIS in human studies. TB-IRIS pathogenesis studies have identified multiple targets for which biological modulators exist. There is a rationale for moving more candidates to human experimental medicine studies and early-stage clinical trials. Even where an interventional study does not show a positive outcome, the pathophysiological insights provided may be extremely valuable. Strategies for future evaluation also include the use of higher doses of corticosteroids for prevention and the use of biomarkers to target preventive and treatment strategies at those most likely to benefit.

Back to Top | Article Outline

CONCLUSION

TB-IRIS causes significant morbidity in resource-limited settings, and mortality risk may be underestimated. A sensitive and specific diagnostic test is lacking, but would be extremely valuable. Biomarkers of risk could aid in identifying high-risk patients for interventions. Clinicians should consider prednisone for TB-IRIS prevention in selected patients. Future research should focus on improving diagnosis and investigating novel therapeutic interventions.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Acknowledgements

None.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Financial support and sponsorship

N.F.W. is supported by a National Institute for Health Research Academic Clinical Lecturership, The British Infection Association and a Starter Grant for Clinical Lecturers (The Academy of Medical Sciences UK, Wellcome, Medical Research Council UK, British Heart Foundation, Arthritis Research UK, Royal College of Physicians and Diabetes UK). S.W. is supported by EDCTP (TMA 2015 CDF-1018) and Wellcome (203135/Z/16/Z). R.J.W. is supported by The Francis Crick Institute which receives support from UKRI (10218), Wellcome (10218) and CRUK (10218). He also receives support from Wellcome (104503, 203135) and NIH (U01A1115940). G.M. was supported by Wellcome (098316 and 203135/Z/16/Z), the South African Research Chairs Initiative of the Department of Science and Technology and National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa (Grant No 64787), NRF incentive funding (UID: 85858) and the South African Medical Research Council through its TB and HIV Collaborating Centres Programme with funds received from the National Department of Health (RFA# SAMRC-RFA-CC: TB/HIV/AIDS-01-2014). The funders had no role in the writing of this review. The opinions, findings and conclusions expressed in this article reflect those of the authors alone.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES AND RECOMMENDED READING

Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • ▪ of special interest
  • ▪▪ of outstanding interest
Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. WHO. Global Tuberculosis Report 2017. Geneva:World Health Organisation; 2017.
2. Namale PE, Abdullahi LH, Fine S, et al. Paradoxical TB-IRIS in HIV-infected adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Future Microbiol 2015; 10:1077–1099.
3▪. Walker NF, Wilkinson KA, Meintjes G, et al. Matrix degradation in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-associated tuberculosis and tuberculosis immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome: a prospective observational study. Clin Infect Dis 2017; 65:121–132.

Recent observational cohort study describing clinical and immunopathological findings in paradoxical TB-IRIS in South African patients, highlighting a role for MMP-8 and mycobacterial antigen in TB-IRIS pathophysiology.

4. Van Rie A, Sawry S, Link-Gelles R, et al. Paradoxical tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in children. Pediatr Pulmonol 2016; 51:157–164.
5. Abay SM, Deribe K, Reda AA, et al. The effect of early initiation of antiretroviral therapy in TB/HIV-coinfected patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care 2015; 14:560–570.
6. Uthman OA, Okwundu C, Gbenga K, et al. Optimal timing of antiretroviral therapy initiation for HIV-infected adults with newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2015; 163:32–39.
7▪. Marais S, Lai RPJ, Wilkinson KA, et al. Inflammasome activation underlying central nervous system deterioration in HIV-associated tuberculosis. J Infect Dis 2017; 215:677–686.

Whole blood microarray analysis of tuberculosis meningitis patients demonstrating more abundant neutrophil-associated transcripts prior to TB-IRIS and more abundant transcripts associated with canonical and noncanonical inflammasomes at the time of TB-IRIS onset, in patients who developed TB-IRIS compared to non-IRIS controls.

8. Bahr N, Boulware DR, Marais S, et al. Central nervous system immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2013; 15:583–593.
9. Lai RP, Meintjes G, Wilkinson RJ. HIV-1 tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. Semin Immunopathol 2016; 38:185–198.
10▪. Nakiwala JK, Walker NF, Diedrich CR, et al. Neutrophil activation and enhanced release of granule products in HIV-TB immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2018; 77:221–229.

Study of two cohorts demonstrating that neutrophils were elevated, activated and found at the site of caseous necrosis in TB-IRIS patients.

11. Meintjes G, Wilkinson RJ, Morroni C, et al. Randomized placebo-controlled trial of prednisone for paradoxical tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. AIDS 2010; 24:2381–2390.
12▪▪. Meintjes G, Stek C, Blumenthal L, et al. Randomised Controlled Trial Of Prednisone For Prevention Of Paradoxical TB-IRIS. Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections. Seattle, Washington, USA, 2017.

RCT demonstrating that prednisone commenced at ART initiation reduced paradoxical TB-IRIS incidence by 30% and was well tolerated.

13. Bell LC, Breen R, Miller RF, et al. Paradoxical reactions and immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in tuberculosis. Int J Infect Dis 2015; 32:39–45.
14. Meintjes G, Lawn SD, Scano F, et al. Tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome: case definitions for use in resource-limited settings. Lancet Infect Dis 2008; 8:516–523.
15. Gopalan N, Santhanakrishnan RK, Palaniappan AN, et al. Daily vs intermittent antituberculosis therapy for pulmonary tuberculosis in patients with HIV: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 2018; 178:485–493.
16. Ravimohan S, Tamuhla N, Kung SJ, et al. Matrix metalloproteinases in tuberculosis-immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome and impaired lung function among advanced HIV/TB co-infected patients initiating antiretroviral therapy. EBioMedicine 2016; 3:100–107.
17. Ravimohan S, Tamuhla N, Steenhoff AP, et al. Immunological profiling of tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome and nonimmune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome death in HIV-infected adults with pulmonary tuberculosis starting antiretroviral therapy: a prospective observational cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 2015; 15:429–438.
18. Singh AK, Malhotra HS, Garg RK, et al. Paradoxical reaction in tuberculous meningitis: presentation, predictors and impact on prognosis. BMC Infect Dis 2016; 16:306.
19. Njuguna IN, Cranmer LM, Otieno VC, et al. Urgent versus post-stabilisation antiretroviral treatment in hospitalised HIV-infected children in Kenya (PUSH): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet HIV 2018; 5 1:e12–e22. doi:10.1016/S2352-3018(17)30167-4
20. Amogne W, Aderaye G, Habtewold A, et al. Efficacy and safety of antiretroviral therapy initiated one week after tuberculosis therapy in patients with CD4 counts < 200 cells/muL: TB-HAART study, a randomized clinical trial. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0122587.
21. Crump JA, Wu X, Kendall MA, et al. Predictors and outcomes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacteremia among patients with HIV and tuberculosis co-infection enrolled in the ACTG A5221 STRIDE study. BMC Infect Dis 2015; 15:12.
22. Psichogiou M, Basoulis D, Tsikala-Vafea M, et al. Integrase strand transfer inhibitors and the emergence of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS). Curr HIV Res 2017; 15:405–410.
23. Grinsztejn B, De Castro N, Arnold V, et al. Raltegravir for the treatment of patients co-infected with HIV and tuberculosis (ANRS 12 180 Reflate TB): a multicentre, phase 2, noncomparative, open-label, randomised trial. Lancet Infect Dis 2014; 14:459–467.
24. Hill AM, Mitchell N, Hughes S, Pozniak AL. Risks of cardiovascular or central nervous system adverse events and immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome, for dolutegravir versus other antiretrovirals: meta-analysis of randomized trials. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 2018; 13:102–111.
25. Hakim J, Musiime V, Szubert AJ, et al. Enhanced prophylaxis plus antiretroviral therapy for advanced HIV infection in Africa. N Engl J Med 2017; 377:233–245.
26. Gibb DM, Szubert AJ, Chidziva E, et al. Impact Of Raltegravir Intensification Of First-line ART On IRIS In The Reality Trial. Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections. Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 2018.
27. Musselwhite LW, Andrade BB, Ellenberg SS, et al. Vitamin D, d-dimer, interferon gamma, and sCD14 levels are independently associated with immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome: a prospective, international study. EBioMedicine 2016; 4:115–123.
28. Tan HY, Yong YK, Andrade BB, et al. Plasma interleukin-18 levels are a biomarker of innate immune responses that predict and characterize tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. AIDS 2015; 29:421–431.
29. Dirix V, Schepers K, Massinga-Loembe M, et al. Added value of long-term cytokine release assays to detect mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in HIV-infected subjects in Uganda. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2016; 72:344–352.
30. Meintjes G, Rangaka MX, Maartens G, et al. Novel relationship between tuberculosis immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome and antitubercular drug resistance. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 48:667–676.
31. Richaud C, Ghosn J, Amazzough K, et al. Antitumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody for steroid-dependent TB-IRIS in AIDS. AIDS 2015; 29:1117–1119.
32. Hsu DC, Faldetta KF, Pei L, et al. A paradoxical treatment for a paradoxical condition: infliximab use in three cases of mycobacterial IRIS. Clin Infect Dis 2016; 62:258–261.
33. Lwin N, Boyle M, Davis JS. Adalimumab for corticosteroid and infliximab-resistant immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in the setting of TB/HIV coinfection. Open Forum Infect Dis 2018; 5:ofy027.
34. Jain S, Bajgai P, Tigari B, et al. Bevacizumab for paradoxical worsening treatment adjunct in HIV patient with choroidal tuberculoma. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect 2016; 6:42.
35. Sierra-Madero JG, Ellenberg S, Rassool MS, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of a chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) antagonist to decrease the occurrence of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in HIV-infection: the CADIRIS Study. Lancet HIV 2014; 1:e60–e67.
36. EACS. European AIDS Clinical Society Guidelines, version 9.0, 2017.
37. Wilkinson KA, Walker NF, Meintjes G, et al. Cytotoxic mediators in paradoxical HIV-associated tuberculosis immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. J Immunol 2015; 194 4:1748–1754.
38. Pean P, Nerrienet E, Madec Y, et al. Natural killer cell degranulation capacity predicts early onset of the immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) in HIV-infected patients with tuberculosis. Blood 2012; 119:3315–3320.
39. Lai RP, Meintjes G, Wilkinson KA, et al. HIV-tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome is characterized by Toll-like receptor and inflammasome signalling. Nature Commun 2015; 6:8451.
40. Tadokera R, Meintjes GA, Wilkinson KA, et al. Matrix metalloproteinases and tissue damage in HIV-tuberculosis immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. Eur J Immunol 2014; 44:127–136.
41. Haridas V, Pean P, Jasenosky LD, et al. TB-IRIS, T-cell activation, and remodeling of the T-cell compartment in highly immunosuppressed HIV-infected patients with TB. AIDS 2015; 29:263–273.
42. Goovaerts O, Jennes W, Massinga-Loembe M, et al. Lower pre-treatment T cell activation in early- and late-onset tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0133924.
43. Manabe YC, Breen R, Perti T, et al. Unmasked tuberculosis and tuberculosis immune reconstitution inflammatory disease: a disease spectrum after initiation of antiretroviral therapy. J Infect Dis 2009; 199:437–444.
44. Mtei L, Matee M, Herfort O, et al. High rates of clinical and subclinical tuberculosis among HIV-infected ambulatory subjects in Tanzania. Clin Infect Dis 2005; 40:1500–1507.
45. Rangaka MX, Wilkinson RJ, Glynn JR, et al. Effect of antiretroviral therapy on the diagnostic accuracy of symptom screening for intensified tuberculosis case finding in a South African HIV clinic. Clin Infect Dis 2012; 55:1698–1706.
46. Lawn SD, Wilkinson RJ, Lipman MC, Wood R. Immune reconstitution and ‘unmasking’ of tuberculosis during antiretroviral therapy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008; 177:680–685.
47. Worodria W, Massinga-Loembe M, Mayanja-Kizza H, et al. Antiretroviral treatment-associated tuberculosis in a prospective cohort of HIV-infected patients starting ART. Clin Dev Immunol 2011; 2011:758350.
48. Haddow LJ, Moosa MY, Mosam A, et al. Incidence, clinical spectrum, risk factors and impact of HIV-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in South Africa. PLoS One 2012; 7:e40623.
49. Murdoch DM, Venter WD, Feldman C, Van Rie A. Incidence and risk factors for the immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in HIV patients in South Africa: a prospective study. AIDS 2008; 22:601–610.
50. Baalwa J, Mayanja-Kizza H, Kamya MR, et al. Worsening and unmasking of tuberculosis in HIV-1 infected patients after initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy in Uganda. Afri Health Sci 2008; 8:190–195.
51. Valin N, Pacanowski J, Denoeud L, et al. Risk factors for ‘unmasking immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome’ presentation of tuberculosis following combination antiretroviral therapy initiation in HIV-infected patients. AIDS 2010; 24:1519–1525.
52. Breen RA, Smith CJ, Cropley I, et al. Does immune reconstitution syndrome promote active tuberculosis in patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy? AIDS 2005; 19:1201–1206.
53. Bell LC, Pollara G, Pascoe M, et al. In vivo molecular dissection of the effects of HIV-1 in active tuberculosis. PLoS Pathog 2016; 12:e1005469.
54. Wilkinson KA, Meintjes G, Seldon R, et al. Immunological characterisation of an unmasking TB-IRIS case. S Afr Med J 2012; 102:512–517.
55. Conradie F, Foulkes AS, Ive P, et al. Natural killer cell activation distinguishes Mycobacterium tuberculosis-mediated immune reconstitution syndrome from chronic HIV and HIV/MTB coinfection. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2011; 58:309–318.
56. Barber DL, Andrade BB, McBerry C, et al. Role of IL-6 in Mycobacterium avium--associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. J Immunol 2014; 192:676–682.
57. Diedrich CR, Mattila JT, Klein E, et al. Reactivation of latent tuberculosis in cynomolgus macaques infected with SIV is associated with early peripheral T cell depletion and not virus load. PLoS One 2010; 5:e9611.
58. Mattila JT, Diedrich CR, Lin PL, et al. Simian immunodeficiency virus-induced changes in T cell cytokine responses in cynomolgus macaques with latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection are associated with timing of reactivation. J Immunol 2011; 186:3527–3537.
Keywords:

HIV-1 infection; immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome; paradoxical; tuberculosis; unmasking

Copyright © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.