Secondary Logo

Share this article on:

The scientific basis of caloric restriction leading to longer life

Fontana, Luigi

Current Opinion in Gastroenterology: March 2009 - Volume 25 - Issue 2 - p 144–150
doi: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e32831ef1ba
Nutrition: Edited by David H. Alpers and William F. Stenson

Purpose of the review The present review discusses the current state of knowledge regarding the effects of calorie restriction in modulating metabolism and aging.

Recent findings There are currently no interventions or gene manipulations that can prevent, stop or reverse the aging process. However, there are a number of interventions that can slow down aging and prolong maximal lifespan up to 60% in experimental animals. Long-term calorie restriction without malnutrition and reduced function mutations in the insulin/IGF-1 signaling pathway are the most robust interventions known to increase maximal lifespan and healthspan in rodents. Although it is currently not known if long-term calorie restriction with adequate nutrition extends maximal lifespan in humans, we do know that long-term calorie restriction without malnutrition results in some of the same metabolic and hormonal adaptations related to longevity in calorie restriction rodents. Moreover, calorie restriction with adequate nutrition protects against obesity, type 2 diabetes, hypertension and atherosclerosis, which are leading causes of morbidity, disability and mortality.

Summary More studies are needed to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of calorie restriction in humans and to characterize new markers of aging/longevity that can assist clinicians in predicting mortality and morbidity of the general population.

Division of Geriatrics and Nutritional Science and Center for Human Nutrition, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

The Division of Nutrition and Aging, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy

Correspondence to Luigi Fontana, MD, PhD, Washington University School of Medicine, 4566 Scott Avenue, Campus Box 8113, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA Tel: +1 314 747 1485; fax: +1 314 362 7657; e-mail: lfontana@dom.wustl.edu

Back to Top | Article Outline

Introduction

In the near future, human aging and age-associated diseases will become one of the biggest challenges faced by developed and developing countries. Life expectancy has markedly increased in most developed countries in the last century, from about 45 years at the beginning of the 20th Century to about 77 years today [1]. This increase is due primarily to reduced death in infancy, but also to improved sanitation and working conditions, the development of antibiotics and vaccines, and better healthcare. However, the overall increase in average life span is far greater than that for healthy life expectancy, as evidenced by the incremental burden of age-associated diseases, including cardiovascular disease, diabetes, hypertension and cancer [2]. The financial burden caused by these chronic diseases is already overwhelming and, if present trends continue, is likely to become unbearable in the next few decades. One of these trends involves the consumption of diets rich in empty calories and poor in nutrients, and a sedentary lifestyle leading to a marked increase in age-associated chronic diseases. In contrast to these harmful effects of overeating unhealthy foods, restriction of calorie intake with adequate intake of nutrients has a wide range of benefits. Moderate calorie restriction with optimal nutrition can prevent and reverse the harmful effects of obesity, type 2 diabetes, hypertension and other age-associated metabolic alterations and diseases. Studies on laboratory animals and preliminary studies on humans have shown that more severe calorie restriction without malnutrition has additional benefits on the aging process itself. The purpose of this article is to succinctly review the current knowledge on the biology of aging, and on the effect of calorie restriction on disease risk and life expectancy, which have important clinical implications for clinicians and healthcare providers.

Back to Top | Article Outline

What is aging?

Aging is a complex biological process characterized by progressive functional and structural deterioration of multiple organ systems that eventually cause death. Primary or intrinsic aging is the physiological decline in biological functions and physical structure that occurs with advancing age independently of disease. As we get older, our skin becomes thinner and wrinkled, our hair becomes white and falls out, and we develop presbyopia and presbycusis. Regional atrophy of subcutaneous tissue, increased deposition of fat in the abdominal region, progressive loss of bone and muscle mass are some of the body composition modifications that invariably occur with aging [3–7]. Internally, the replacement of functional parenchyma with fibroconnective tissue in the heart and arteries, lungs, and kidneys results in a progressive deterioration of heart function and rhythm, increased blood pressure, reductions in maximal breathing and vital capacity, and glomerular filtration rate [8–13,14•,15]. In contrast, secondary or extrinsic aging is caused by an interaction between harmful environmental factors (e.g. unhealthy diets, physical inactivity, smoking, pollution, radiation) and genetic factors that causes serious and debilitating diseases (e.g. obesity, diabetes, hypertension, coronary heart disease, stroke, cancer) that accelerate the aging process and cause suffering, disability and premature death. Heart disease, cancer, stroke and diabetes are the four leading causes of death, accounting for approximately 70% of all deaths in developed and developing countries [16].

Back to Top | Article Outline

Is primary or intrinsic aging preventable?

There are currently no interventions or gene manipulations that can prevent, stop or reverse the aging process. However, there are a number of interventions that can slow down aging and prolong maximal lifespan up to 60% in experimental animals. The most robust intervention known to increase maximal lifespan and healthspan is calorie restriction, defined as a reduction in calorie intake below usual ad libitum intake, without malnutrition [17•]. In 1935, McCay et al. [18] published the first paper showing that calorie restriction with adequate nutrition extends maximal lifespan in rats. Since then hundreds of studies have consistently shown that calorie restriction slow down aging in yeast, worms, insects, fishes and rodents [19,20]. Alternate-day fasting and methionine restriction also prolong maximal lifespan in rodents [21,22]. Recently, it has been shown that maximal lifespan can also be extended by a small number of spontaneous or induced genetic alterations, including reduced function mutations of genes encoding proteins of the insulin/IGF-1 pathway [23–28,29••] and of other pathways regulating hormonal and mitogenic signals (e.g. type 5 adenylyl cyclase, p66shc) [30••,31]. Transgenic mice overexpressing klotho, a protein that inhibits insulin and IGF-1 signaling, and mice overexpressing catalase targeted to mitochondria, an antioxidant protein, are also living significantly longer than wild-type mice [32,33].

Back to Top | Article Outline

Is secondary aging preventable? Are chronic diseases associated with aging preventable?

Aging and chronic diseases are often viewed as inextricably linked. We now know that this is not true, because in mammals it is possible to prevent the development of chronic diseases. Data from postmortem pathological studies have demonstrated that many calorie restricted and long-lived mutant rodents die without evidence of organ pathology severe enough to be recorded as a probable cause of death. In one experimental study, chronic calorie restriction without malnutrition prevented the development of chronic diseases in approximately one third of the animals, which died without any lethal pathological lesion when they were very old [28]. In contrast, only 5% of the ‘ad-libitum’ fed animals died without any pathological lesion, and most of them when they were young [34]. In another series of studies, 25 to 47% of the long-lived Ames and Snell dwarf mice died without obvious evidence of lethal pathological lesions, whereas only 0 to 7% of their normal siblings died without any pathological lesion [35,36]. Furthermore, approximately 50% of the long-lived growth hormone receptor knockout mice have no obvious evidence of lethal pathology at death [37].

Delayed incidence, progression, or both, of both neoplastic and nonneoplastic lesions, and reduced disease burden are also common pathological findings in calorie restrictied rodents and long-lived mutant rodents. Calorie restriction prevents or delays a wide range of chronic diseases, including cancer, atherosclerosis, diabetes, cardiomyopathy, kidney disease, autoimmune and neurodegenerative diseases in rodents [19–21,34,38–40]. Snell dwarf mice also show lower incidence, delayed progression and reduced severity of both neoplastic (fibrosarcoma, hemangiosarcoma, mammary adenocarcinoma) and nonneoplastic (glomerulonephritis) lesions [35,36]. In humans, calorie restriction with adequate nutrition protects against obesity, type 2 diabetes, dyslipedemia, hypertension, inflammation and atherosclerosis, which are major risk factors for myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure and chronic kidney disease [41–47]. Data on the long-term effects of calorie restriction on factors implicated in the pathogenesis of cancer, the second leading cause of death, are accumulating. Excessive adiposity, chronic hyperinsulinemia, increased plasma free insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) concentration, increased bioavailability of sex steroid hormones, and systemic inflammation are some of the metabolic-risk factors that have been associated with several common cancers, such as breast, colon, endometrial, pancreas and kidney cancer [48]. Long-term calorie restriction in humans prevents the accumulation of excessive body fat, reduces circulating insulin levels and inhibits inflammation [41–47].

Back to Top | Article Outline

Does excessive adiposity play a role in aging?

Excessive adiposity and its associated metabolic alterations play a key role in the pathogenesis of many chronic diseases, including diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease and some type of cancers [48,49]. These chronic diseases accelerate the aging of multiple organ systems and often cause premature death. In obese individuals long-term total mortality after sustained weight loss is significantly reduced, particularly deaths from diabetes, heart disease, and cancer [50••,51••]. Nonetheless, low adiposity does not play the key role in modulating primary aging and maximal life span extension. In fact, only average lifespan but not maximum lifespan increases in rats that maintain a low body fat mass by performing regular exercise (high-energy flux), whereas both average and maximal lifespan do increase in sedentary rats that are food-restricted (low-energy flux), even though the exercising animals were leaner and more insulin sensitive than the calorie restricted animals [52,53]. Moreover, maximum lifespan is longer in calorie restricted genetically obese (ob/ob) mice than in ad libitum-fed, genetically-normal lean mice, even though body fat in the calorie restricted ob/ob mouse is more than twice that of the ad-libitum fed genetically normal lean mouse [54]. More studies in both rodents and humans are needed to elucidate the metabolic and molecular mechanisms responsible for the different effects of calorie restriction (low-energy flux) and exercise (high-energy flux) on aging and longevity. Recent data demonstrate that calorie restricted mice have significantly lower serum fasting IGF-1 and insulin concentrations and tissue stress-related proteins levels than weight matched exercising mice, suggesting that the failure of exercise to extend maximal lifespan may be due to an inability to fully mimic the metabolic/hormonal response to calorie restriction [55]. In humans, for example, serum triiodothyronine concentration was approximately 30% lower in individuals practicing long-term calorie restriction than in the endurance athletes, even though percentage body fat was low and similar in these two groups [56].

Back to Top | Article Outline

The biological mechanism of aging: is it still a mystery?

The exact mechanism by which calorie restriction has such a dramatic effect on primary aging is not yet known. Many interrelated and overlapping factors have been proposed to play a role. The four most important calorie restriction-induced antiaging mechanisms are thought be: neuroendocrine systems adaptations, prevention of inflammation, hormetic response, and protection against oxidative stress damage.

Numerous studies have consistently demonstrated that long-term calorie restriction without malnutrition and reduced function mutations in the insulin/IGF-1 signaling pathway are the most robust interventions known to increase maximal lifespan in rodents [17•,19,20,24–28,29••]. Calorie restriction decreases serum IGF-1 concentration by approximately 40% in rodents, and this calorie restriction-mediated reduction in IGF-1 levels is believed to play a key role in mediating its antiaging and anticancer effects [57,58]. Growth hormone (GH)-deficient and GH receptor-deficient mice also have low circulating IGF-1 levels and increased maximal lifespans [24–26]. In addition, decreased IGF-1 signaling is involved in the delayed aging phenotype of IGF-1 receptor-deficient mice and klotho transgenic mice [27,32]. Other important calorie restriction-mediated metabolic adaptations, that have been shown to play an important role in mediating the antiaging effects of calorie restriction, are: increased insulin sensitivity [59], reduced levels of anabolic hormones (e.g. insulin, testosterone, leptin) [59,60], reduced levels of hormones that regulate thermogenesis and cellular metabolism (e.g. triiodothyronine, norepinephrine) [61,62] and finally increased levels of hormones that suppress inflammation (e.g. cortisol, adiponectin, ghrelin) [63,64].

Protection against inflammation is another key calorie restriction-mediated antiaging mechanism. Chronic inflammation causes tissue damage, fibrosis, and organ dysfunction, and is implicated in the pathogenesis of many age-associated chronic diseases and in the aging process itself [65]. Calorie restriction animals have low levels of circulating inflammatory cytokines, low blood lymphocyte levels, and reduced production of inflammatory cytokines by the white blood cells in response to stimulation, and cortisol levels in the high normal range [63,66,67]. In addition, recent data demonstrate that calorie restriction also exerts a powerful anti-inflammatory effect in humans [41,42]. Multiple metabolic and neuroendocrine mechanisms are responsible for this calorie restriction-mediated anti-inflammatory effect, including low adiposity and reduced secretion of proinflammatory adipokines and cytokines, reduced plasma glucose and advanced glycation end-product concentrations, increased cortisol and ghrelin production and increased parasympathetic tone. The developments in this area are summarized in a recent review article [68].

Hormesis, defined as a beneficial biological process by which a low-intensity stressor increases resistance to another more intense stressor, has been proposed to play a role in mediating some of the antiaging effects of chronic calorie restriction and alternate day fasting. For example, it is well known that exposing mice to low doses of ionizing radiation shortly before irradiating them with very high levels of ionizing radiation actually decreases the likelihood of developing cancer [69]. Similarly, chronic calorie restriction has been hypothesized to be a hormetic agent, because it acts as a chronic low-grade stressor that provokes a survival response in the organism, helping it to endure adversity by activating longevity pathways [70]. This theory explains why calorie restriction animals are more resistant to a wide range of stresses (e.g. surgery, radiation, acute inflammation, exposure to heat, and oxidative stress) [70–73]. In fact, chronic calorie restriction results in functional moderate hyperadrenocorticism and enhanced expression of heat shock proteins in response to stress, that help the animal to cope with a broad array of acute stressors and noxious agents [63,71,72]. Moreover, calorie restriction has been shown to enhance DNA repair systems [74], promote the removal of damaged proteins and oxidized lipids [75] and upregulate endogenous enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidative defense mechanisms [76].

Accumulating free-radical damage to biomolecules is currently one of the most accepted explanations for how aging occurs in mammals. It is well known that oxidative damage and mtDNA point mutations induced by oxidative stress dramatically increases during aging [77]. In addition, calorie restriction has been shown to protect against the age-associated accumulation of molecular oxidative damage. Calorie restricted animals have lower levels of oxidative damage to proteins, lipids and DNA [78]. However, most of the evidence in support of this theory is correlative, and preliminary data do not support the theory that oxidative stress under normal conditions is a key determinant of lifespan in mammals. Indeed, administration of several antioxidants to laboratory animals failed to increase lifespan [79,80]. Moreover, rodents with genetic deletion of several antioxidant enzymes (e.g. Sod2+/−, Prxd1+/−, and Sod1+/− mice) do not have a shorter lifespan, despite having elevated oxidative stress markers and tumor burden. It remains to be seen whether the reduction in oxidative damage observed in calorie restricted rodents, p66shc knockout and IGF-1 signaling deficient mice is just an epiphenomenon rather than the causal link [81••].

Back to Top | Article Outline

Does calorie restriction extend maximal lifespan in nonhuman primates?

Although it has been suggested that the slowing of aging by calorie restriction is a general phenomenon that applies to all species, there is currently no evidence that calorie restriction may extend maximal lifespan in nonhuman primates. There are two longevity studies (one at the University of Wisconsin, the other at the National Institute on Aging in USA), which are examining the long-term effects of calorie restriction on aging in rhesus monkeys. Up to now, the experimental data have shown that many of the metabolic, hormonal and structural adaptations that take place in calorie restriction rodents happen also in calorie restricted monkeys. Calorie restricted monkeys have approximately 70% lower body fat, higher insulin sensitivity, lower serum triiodothyronine concentration and core body temperature, and reduced inflammation, glycation and oxidative damage of several tissues [75,82–87]. They are protected against dyslipidemia and type 2 diabetes [88]. In addition, immune senescence and sarcopenia are attenuated in calorie restricted monkeys [89,90]. However, as rhesus monkeys have an average and maximum lifespan of 27 and 40 years respectively, it may be another 10 years before maximal lifespan data become available on these primates.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Does calorie restriction work in humans?

Although it is currently not known if long-term calorie restriction with adequate nutrition extends maximal lifespan in humans, we do know that long-term calorie restriction without malnutrition results in some of the same metabolic and hormonal adaptations related to longevity in calorie restricted rodents, including reduced body temperature and resting metabolic rate, and reduced markers of oxidative stress [91,92]. Calorie restriction reduces fasting insulin levels, several growth factors, profibrotic molecules and cytokines, including serum concentration of PDGF, TGF-α and TNF-α [41,42,45,46,93]. Long-term calorie restriction with adequate nutrition is also associated with sustained low serum T3 concentration, similar to that found in calorie restricted rodents and monkeys [56,91,94]. This effect is likely due to calorie restriction itself, rather than a decrease in body fat mass, and could be involved in slowing the rate of aging in humans as well. Finally, calorie restriction improves diastolic function, a marker of primary aging of the heart [93]. More studies are needed to determine whether humans develop the full range of metabolic and functional adaptive responses to calorie restriction that occur in rodents, and whether cardiovascular, pulmonary and kidney aging are slowed down by calorie restriction in humans.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Conclusion

Data are accumulating on the beneficial effects of calorie restriction in humans. We know that calorie restriction with adequate nutrition protects against obesity, type 2 diabetes, hypertension and atherosclerosis, which are leading causes of morbidity, disability and mortality. Preliminary data suggest that calorie restriction with adequate nutrition may also protect against cancer, the second leading cause of death. Nonetheless, nothing is known about the effects of calorie restriction on the risk of developing autoimmune disease and dementia, and on the rate of aging in humans. More studies are needed to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of calorie restriction in humans and to characterize new markers of aging/longevity that can assist clinicians in predicting mortality and morbidity of the general population.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Acknowledgements

Financial Disclosures: There are no conflicts of interests.

Funding/Support: Supported by NIH General Clinical Research Center Grant RR00036, Istituto Superiore di Sanità/National Institutes of Health Collaboration Program Grant, a grant from the Longer Life Foundation (an RGA/Washington University Partnership) and a donation from the Scott and Annie Appleby Charitable Trust.

Role of the Sponsor: The funding agency had no role in the analysis or interpretation of the data or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

Back to Top | Article Outline

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:

• of special interest

•• of outstanding interest

Additional references related to this topic can also be found in the Current World Literature section in this issue (p. 170).

1 Oeppen J, Vaupel JW. Demography. Broken limits to life expectancy. Science 2002; 296:1029–1031.
2 Eyre H, Khan R, Robertson RM, et al. Preventing cancer, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes: a common agenda for the ACS, the ADA, and the AHA. CA Cancer J Clin 2004; 54:190–207.
3 Seidell JC, Oosterlee A, Deurenberg P, et al. Abdominal fat depots measured with computed tomography: effects of degree of obesity, sex, and age. Eur J Clin Nutr 1988; 42:805–815.
4 Evans WJ, Campbell WW. Sarcopenia and age-related changes in body composition and functional capacity. J Nutr 1993; 123:465–468.
5 Nair KS. Aging muscle. Am J Clin Nutr 2005; 81:953–963.
6 Berger C, Langsetmo L, Joseph L, et al, Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study Research Group. Change in bone mineral density as a function of age in women and men and association with the use of antiresorptive agents. CMAJ 2008; 178:1660–1668.
7 Riggs BL, Melton Iii LJ 3rd, Robb RA, et al. Population-based study of age and sex differences in bone volumetric density, size, geometry, and structure at different skeletal sites. J Bone Miner Res 2004; 19:1945–1954.
8 Lakatta EG, Levy D. Arterial and cardiac aging: major shareholders in cardiovascular disease enterprises: Part II: the aging heart in health: links to heart disease. Circulation 2003; 107:346–354.
9 Lakatta EG, Levy D. Arterial and cardiac aging: major shareholders in cardiovascular disease enterprises: Part I: aging arteries: a “set up” for vascular disease. Circulation 2003; 107:139–146.
10 Antelmi I, De Paula RS, Shinzato AR, et al. Influence of age, gender, body mass index, and functional capacity on heart rate variability in a cohort of subjects without heart disease. Am J Cardiol 2004; 93:381–385.
11 Fluckiger L, Boivin JM, Quilliot D, et al. Differential effects of aging on heart rate variability and blood pressure variability. J Gerontol Med Sci 1999; 54:B219–B224.
12 McClaran SR, Babcock MA, Pegelow DF, et al. Longitudinal effects of aging on lung function at rest and exercise in healthy active fit elderly adults. J Appl Physiol 1995; 78:1957–1968.
13 Hagberg JM, Yerg JE, Seals DR. Pulmonary function in young and older athletes and untrained men. J Appl Physiol 1988; 65:101–105.
14• Zhou XJ, Rakheja D, Yu X, Saxena R, Vaziri ND, Silva FG. The aging kidney. Kidney Int 2008; 74:710–720. A detailed review of the biologic of kidney aging.
15 Coresh J, Astor BC, Greene T, et al. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease and decreased kidney function in the adult US population: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am J Kidney Dis 2003; 41:1–12.
16 WHO. The world health report. http://www.who.org/whr [Accessed 18 September 2008]
17• Fontana L, Klein S. Aging, adiposity, and calorie restriction. JAMA 2007; 297:986–994. A comprehensive review of the factors involved in the aging process, and the effect of calorie restriction and excessive adiposity on healthspan and lifespan. These factors have potentially important clinical and public health implications.
18 McCay CM, Crowel MF, Maynard LA. The effect of retarded growth upon the length of the life span and upon the ultimate body size. J Nutr 1935; 10:63–79.
19 Weindruch R, Walford RL. The retardation of aging and disease by dietary restriction. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas Publisher; 1988.
20 Masoro EJ. Overview of caloric restriction and ageing. Mech Ageing Dev 2005; 126:913–922.
21 Martin B, Mattson MP, Maudsley S. Caloric restriction and intermittent fasting: two potential diets for successful brain aging. Ageing Res Rev 2006; 5:332–353.
22 Orentreich N, Matias JR, DeFelice A, Zimmerman JA. Low methionine ingestion by rats extends life span. J Nutr 1993; 123:269–274.
23 Miller RA, Buehner G, Chang Y, et al. Methionine-deficient diet extends mouse lifespan, slows immune and lens aging, alters glucose, T4, IGF-I and insulin levels, and increases hepatocyte MIF levels and stress resistance. Aging Cell 2005; 4:119–125.
24 Brown-Borg HM, Borg KE, Meliska CJ, Bartke A. Dwarf mice and the ageing process. Nature 1996; 384:33.
25 Flurkey K, Papaconstantinou J, Miller RA, Harrison DE. Lifespan extension and delayed immune and collagen aging in mutant mice with defects in growth hormone production. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001; 98:6736–6741.
26 Coschigano KT, Clemmons D, Bellush LL, Kopchick JJ. Assessment of growth parameters and life span of GHR/BP gene-disrupted mice. Endocrinology 2000; 141:2608–2613.
27 Holzenberger M, Dupont J, Ducos B, et al. IGF-1 receptor regulates lifespan and resistance to oxidative stress in mice. Nature 2003; 421:182–187.
28 Bluher M, Kahn BB, Kahn CR. Extended longevity in mice lacking the insulin receptor in adipose tissue. Science 2003; 299:572–574.
29•• Selman C, Lingard S, Choudhury AI, et al. Evidence for lifespan extension and delayed age-related biomarkers in insulin receptor substrate 1 null mice. FASEB J 2008; 22:807–818. This study shows that insulin receptor substrate 1 null mice live significantly longer than wild-type mice, reinforcing the importance of insulin signaling in modulating aging.
30•• Yan L, Vatner DE, O'Connor JP, et al. Type 5 adenylyl cyclase disruption increases longevity and protects against stress. Cell 2007; 130:247–258. This study shows that 5 adenylyl cyclase (AC5) is knocked out of mice that live significantly longer than wild-type mice, reinforcing the importance of β-adrenergic signaling in modulating aging.
31 Migliaccio E, Giorgio M, Mele S, et al. The p66shc adaptor protein controls oxidative stress response and life span in mammals. Nature 1999; 402:309–313.
32 Kurosu H, Yamamoto M, Clark JD, et al. Suppression of aging in mice by the hormone Klotho. Science 2005; 309:1829–1833.
33 Schriner SE, Linford NJ, Martin GM, et al. Extension of murine life span by overexpression of catalase targeted to mitochondria. Science 2005; 308:1909–1911.
34 Shimokawa I, Higami Y, Hubbard GB, et al. Diet and the suitability of the male Fischer 344 rat as a model for aging research. J Gerontol 1993; 48:B27–B32.
35 Ikeno Y, Bronson RT, Hubbard GB, et al. Delayed occurrence of fatal neoplastic diseases in ames dwarf mice: correlation to extended longevity. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2003; 58:291–296.
36 Vergara M, Smith-Wheelock M, Harper JM, et al. Hormone-treated snell dwarf mice regain fertility but remain long lived and disease resistant. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2004; 59:1244–1250.
37 Ikeno Y, Lew CM, Cortez LA, et al. Do long-lived mutant and calorie-restricted mice share common antiaging mechanisms: a pathological point of view. Age 2006; 28:163–171.
38 Hursting SD, Lavigne JA, Berrigan D, et al. Calorie restriction, aging, and cancer prevention: mechanisms of action and applicability to humans. Annu Rev Med 2003; 54:131–152.
39 Guo Z, Mitchell-Raymundo F, Yang H, et al. Dietary restriction reduces atherosclerosis and oxidative stress in the aorta of apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Mech Ageing Dev 2002; 123:1121–1131.
40 Piccio L, Stark JL, Cross AH. Chronic calorie restriction attenuates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Leukoc Biol 2008; 84:940–948.
41 Fontana L, Meyer TE, Klein S, Holloszy JO. Long-term calorie restriction is highly effective in reducing the risk for atherosclerosis in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004; 101:6659–6663.
42 Fontana L, Villareal DT, Weiss EP, et al, and the Washington University School of Medicine CALERIE Group. Calorie restriction or exercise: effects on coronary heart disease risk factors. A randomized, controlled trial. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2007; 293:E197–202.
43 Lefevre M, Redman LM, Heilbronn LK, Smith JV, Martin CK, Rood JC, Greenway FL, Williamson DA, Smith SR, Ravussin E; for the Pennington CALERIE team. Caloric restriction alone and with exercise improves CVD risk in healthy nonobese individuals. Atherosclerosis. 2008 [Epub ahead of print]
44 Racette SB, Weiss EP, Villareal DT, et al, Washington University School of Medicine CALERIE Group. One year of caloric restriction in humans: feasibility and effects on body composition and abdominal adipose tissue. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2006; 61:943–950.
45 Weiss EP, Racette SB, Villareal DT, et al. Improvements in glucose tolerance and insulin action induced by increasing energy expenditure or decreasing energy intake: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2006; 84:1033–1042.
46 Larson-Meyer DE, Heilbronn LK, Redman LM, et al. Effect of calorie restriction with or without exercise on insulin sensitivity, beta-cell function, fat cell size, and ectopic lipid in overweight subjects. Diabetes Care 2006; 29:1337–1344.
47 Redman LM, Heilbronn LK, Martin CK, et al, Pennington CALERIE Team. Effect of calorie restriction with or without exercise on body composition and fat distribution. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007; 92:865–872.
48 Calle EE, Kaaks R. Overweight, obesity and cancer: epidemiological evidence and proposed mechanisms. Nat Rev Cancer 2004; 4:579–591.
49 Poirier P, Giles TD, Bray GA, et al, American Heart Association; Obesity Committee of the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism. Obesity and cardiovascular disease: pathophysiology, evaluation, and effect of weight loss: an update of the 1997 American Heart Association Scientific Statement on Obesity and Heart Disease from the Obesity Committee of the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism. Circulation 2006; 113:898–918.
50•• Adams TD, Gress RE, Smith SC, et al. Long-term mortality after gastric bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 2007; 357:753–761. This paper shows that long-term total mortality after gastric bypass surgery is significantly reduced. In particular, during a mean follow-up of 7.1 years, adjusted long-term mortality in the surgery group decreased by 56% for coronary artery disease, by 92% for diabetes, and by 60% for cancer.
51•• Sjostrom L, Narbro K, Sjostrom CD, et al, Swedish Obese Subjects Study. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med 2007; 357:741–752. This paper shows that long-term weight loss is associated with decreased overall mortality.
52 Holloszy JO. Mortality rate and longevity of food-restricted exercising male rats: a reevaluation. J Appl Physiol 1997; 82:399–403.
53 Oscai LB, Holloszy JO. Effects of weight changes produced by exercise, food restriction, or overeating on body composition. J Clin Invest 1969; 48:2124–2128.
54 Harrison DE, Archer JR, Astle CM. Effects of food restriction on aging: separation of food intake and adiposity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1984; 81:1835–1838.
55 Huffman DM, Moellering DR, Grizzle WE, et al. Effect of exercise and calorie restriction on biomarkers of aging in mice. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2008; 294:R1618–R1627.
56 Fontana L, Klein S, Holloszy JO, Premachandra BN. Effect of long-term calorie restriction with adequate protein and micronutrients on thyroid hormones. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006; 91:3232–3235.
57 Sonntag WE, Lynch CD, Cefalu WT, et al. Pleiotropic effects of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 on biological aging: inferences from moderate caloric-restricted animals. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1999; 5:B521–B538.
58 Dunn SE, Kari FW, French J, et al. Dietary restriction reduces insulin-like growth factor I levels, which modulates apoptosis, cell proliferation, and tumor progression in p53-deficient mice. Cancer Res 1997; 57:4667–4672.
59 Barzilai N, Banerjee S, Hawkins M, et al. Caloric restriction reverses hepatic insulin resistance in aging rats by decreasing visceral fat. J Clin Invest 1998; 101:1353–1361.
60 Chen H, Luo L, Liu J, et al. Aging and caloric restriction: effects on Leydig cell steroidogenesis. Exp Gerontol 2005; 40:498–505.
61 Herlihy JT, Stacy C, Bertrand HA. Long-term food restriction depresses serum thyroid hormone concentrations in the rat. Mech Ageing Dev 1990; 53:9–16.
62 Landsberg L, Young JB. Diet-induced changes in sympathetic nervous system activity. In: Bassett EG, editor. Nutritional factors: modulating effects on metabolic processes. New York: Raven Press; 1981. pp. 155–174.
63 Sabatino F, Masoro EJ, McMahan CA, Kuhn RW. Assessment of the role of the glucocorticoid system in aging processes and in the action of food restriction. J Gerontol 1991; 46:B171–B179.
64 Yang H, Youm YH, Nakata C, Dixit VD. Chronic caloric restriction induces forestomach hypertrophy with enhanced ghrelin levels during aging. Peptides 2007; 28:1931–1936.
65 Chung HY, Cesari M, Anton S, Marzetti E, Giovannini S, Seo AY, Carter C, Yu BP, Leeuwenburgh C. Molecular inflammation: underpinnings of aging and age-related diseases. Ageing Res Rev 2008 [Epub ahead of print]
66 Ershler WB, Sun WH, Binkley N, et al. Interleukin-6 and aging: blood levels and mononuclear cell production increase with advancing age and in vitro production is modifiable by dietary restriction. Lymphokine Cytokine Res 1993; 12:225–230.
67 Matsuzaki J, Kuwamura M, Yamaji R, et al. Inflammatory responses to lipopolysaccharide are suppressed in 40% energy-restricted mice. J Nutr 2001; 131:2139–2144.
68 Fontana L. Neuroendocrine factors in the regulation of inflammation: excessive adiposity and calorie restriction. Exp Gerontol 2008. [Epub ahead of print]
69 Mitchel RE. Cancer and low dose responses in vivo: implications for radiation protection. Dose Response 2007; 5:284–291.
70 Masoro EJ. The role of hormesis in life extension by dietary restriction. Interdiscip Top Gerontol 2007; 35:1–17.
71 Heydari AR, Wu B, Takahashi R, et al. Expression of heat shock protein 70 is altered by age and diet at the level of transcription. Mol Cell Biol 1993; 13:410–418.
72 Klebanov S, Shehab D, Stavinoha WB, et al. Hyperadrenocorticism attenuated inflammation, and the life prolonging action of food restriction in mice. J Gerontol Biol Sci 1995; 50A:B78–B82.
73 Berg TF, Breen PJ, Feuers RJ, et al. Acute toxicity of ganciclovir: effect of dietary restriction and chronobiology. Fd Chem Toxic 1994; 32:45–50.
74 Weraarchakul N, Strong R, Wood WG, Richardson A. Effect of aging and dietary restriction on DNA repair. Exp Cell Res 1989; 181:197–204.
75 Sell DR, Lane MA, Obrenovich ME, et al. The effect of caloric restriction on glycation and glycoxidation in skin collagen of nonhuman primates. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2003; 58:508–516.
76 Cho CG, Kim HJ, Chung SW, et al. Modulation of glutathione and thioredoxin systems by calorie restriction during the aging process. Exp Gerontol 2003; 38:539–548.
77 Beckman KB, Ames BN. The free radical theory of aging matures. Physiol Rev 1998; 78:547–581.
78 Sohal RS, Weindruch R. Oxidative stress, caloric restriction and aging. Science 1996; 273:59–63.
79 Holloszy JO. Longevity of exercising male rats: effect of an antioxidant supplemented diet. Mech Ageing Dev 1998; 100:211–219.
80 Lee CK, Pugh TD, Klopp RG, et al. The impact of alpha-lipoic acid, coenzyme Q10 and caloric restriction on life span and gene expression patterns in mice. Free Radic Biol Med 2004; 36:1043–1057.
81•• Muller FL, Lustgarten MS, Jang Y, et al. Trends in oxidative aging theories. Free Radic Biol Med 2007; 43:477–503. A detailed review that analyze recent findings relevant in evaluating the free radical theory of aging using experimental results as grouped by model organisms. This review article focuses primarily on recent work involving genetic manipulations.
82 DeLany JP, Hansen BC, Bodkin NL, Hannah J, Bray GA. Long-term calorie restriction reduces energy expenditure in aging monkeys. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1999; 54:B5–B11.
83 Kemnitz JW, Roecker EB, Weindruch R, et al. Dietary restriction increases insulin sensitivity and lowers blood glucose in rhesus monkeys. Am J Physiol 1994; 266:E540–E547.
84 Lane MA, Baer DJ, Rumpler WV, et al. Calorie restriction lowers body temperature in rhesus monkeys, consistent with a postulated antiaging mechanism in rodents. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996; 93:4159–4164.
85 Roth GS, Handy AM, Mattison JA, et al. Effects of dietary caloric restriction and aging on thyroid hormones of rhesus monkeys. Horm Metab Res 2002; 34:378–382.
86 Kim MJ, Aiken JM, Havighurst T, et al. Adult-onset energy restriction of rhesus monkeys attenuates oxidative stress-induced cytokine expression by peripheral blood mononuclear cells. J Nutr 1997; 127:2293–2301.
87 Zainal TA, Oberley TD, Allison DB, et al. Caloric restriction of rhesus monkeys lowers oxidative damage in skeletal muscle. FASEB J 2000; 14:1825–1836.
88 Lane MA, Ingram DK, Roth GS. Calorie restriction in nonhuman primates: effects on diabetes and cardiovascular disease risk. Toxicol Sci 1999; 52:41–48.
89 Colman RJ, Beasley TM, Allison DB, Weindruch R. Attenuation of sarcopenia by dietary restriction in rhesus monkeys. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2008; 63:556–559.
90 Messaoudi I, Warner J, Fischer M, et al. Delay of T cell senescence by caloric restriction in aged long-lived nonhuman primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103:19448–19453.
91 Heilbronn LK, de Jonge L, Frisard MI, et al, Pennington CALERIE Team. Effect of 6-month calorie restriction on biomarkers of longevity, metabolic adaptation, and oxidative stress in overweight individuals: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2006; 295:1539–1548.
92 Hofer T, Fontana L, Weiss EP, et al. One year of caloric restriction and exercise in humans and the effects on DNA and RNA oxidation levels in white blood cells and urine. Rejuvenation Res 2008; 11:793–799.
93 Meyer TE, Kovács SJ, Ehsani AA, et al. Long-term caloric restriction ameliorates the decline in diastolic function in humans. J Am College Cardiol 2006; 47:398–402.
94 Weiss EP, Villareal DT, Racette SB, et al. Caloric restriction but not exercise-induced reductions in fat mass decrease plasma triiodothyronine concentrations: a randomized controlled trial. Rejuvenation Res 2008; 11:605–609.
Keywords:

aging; calorie restriction; physical exercise; prevention

© 2009 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.