Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

The gut microbiota in type 1 diabetes

friend or foe?

Gavin, Patrick G.; Hamilton-Williams, Emma E.

Current Opinion in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity: August 2019 - Volume 26 - Issue 4 - p 207–212
doi: 10.1097/MED.0000000000000483
DIABETES AND ENDOCHRINE PANCREAS II: Edited by Peter A. Gottlieb
Free

Purpose of review Evidence is mounting that disturbances in the gut microbiota play a role in the rising incidence of type 1 diabetes (T1D) and new technologies are expanding our ability to understand microbial function and host interactions. Longitudinal data from large cohorts of children at risk of T1D are nor solidifying our understanding of the function of the microbiota in this disease.

Recent findings Although taxonomic changes in the gut microbiota associated with T1D are relatively modest, a functional defect in production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) remains as a unifying feature across multiple studies and populations. Dysbiosis of the microbiota in T1D has been linked to decreased gut barrier and exocrine pancreas function. We explore factors contributing to the disturbed microbiota in T1D such as infant diet, probiotic use and genetic risk linked to defective immune regulation. We also discuss the interplay between immunotherapy, the gut immune response and the microbiota.

Summary Functional alterations in the microbiota are linked to pathogenesis of T1D and these findings provide a rationale for future investigations aimed at establishing a healthy microbiota and promoting SCFA production and prevention of T1D.

The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia

Correspondence to Emma E. Hamilton-Williams, The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, 37 Kent St, Woolloongabba, Brisbane 4102, QLD, Australia. E-mail: e.hamiltonwilliams@uq.edu.au

Back to Top | Article Outline

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of type 1 diabetes (T1D) has been progressively rising over the past several decades due to complex environmental changes [1]. Factors proposed to contribute to this rise include diet, antibiotic use, infection, vitamin D levels, toxin and chemical exposure, birth weight and birth delivery route [2]. Many of these are intimately linked to the function and composition of the gut microbiota, leading to the hypothesis that disturbances in the gut microbiota are associated with T1D pathogenesis. In this review, we discuss recent advances in understanding the role of the gut microbiota in islet autoimmunity mechanistic insights as to how the microbiota and islet immune response may be connected.

Box 1

Box 1

Back to Top | Article Outline

MICROBIAL DYSBIOSIS IN TYPE 1 DIABETES

Early studies suggested an increased abundance of members of the Bacteroides genus and decreased microbial diversity in at-risk individuals with islet-autoantibodies (IAb+) and those with T1D and hinted that these differences may be linked to reduced metabolism of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) [3–7]. However, the majority of these studies were underpowered, involved individuals from a single location and relied on single time-point 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing to estimate community composition. Unsurprisingly, these limitations led to discordant findings regarding specific taxa which might contribute to autoimmunity. Recently, findings from longitudinal stool samples from ‘The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young’ (TEDDY) study overcame these limitations and have provided a more robust understanding of the temporal development of the gut microbiota in T1D [8▪▪,9▪▪]. These studies used both amplicon sequencing (n = 12 005) and shotgun metagenome (n = 10 867) sequencing to explore community composition and functional potential of the bacteria in stool samples from 903 children at increased risk of developing T1D. TEDDY individuals were accrued from six sites in the USA and Europe. Comparison of abundance data from the amplicon sequencing of IAb+ children and controls (n = 316 pairs) found higher levels of Erysipelotrichaceae in those with IAbs. Sixteen genera significantly differed between children who developed T1D from controls (n = 96 pairs). These included higher levels of Lactococcus, Streptococcus and Akkermansia in control individuals. In the metagenomic arm of the TEDDY study, 415 controls, 267 IAb+ and 101 T1D individuals were analyzed [9▪▪]. Taxonomic differences revealed modest effects including higher Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactococcus lactis, Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Bifidobacterium dentium in controls. S. thermophilus and L. lactis are common in dairy products and B. dentium was shown to be sensitive to perturbation by antibiotics. The taxonomic differences identified in the amplicon vs. metagenomics only partly overlapped, perhaps due to bias introduced by the respective methodologies including slightly different approaches to the data cleaning or reflecting the marginal significance of the changes. Although these studies represent the largest and most rigorous of their kind, it should be noted that most of the findings regarding T1D were of modest effect size, and restricted to predominantly white populations with early-onset disease. In addition, some stool samples were shipped at ambient temperature which may have distorted the observed bacterial populations [10]. Furthermore, the analysis of IAb+ children in TEDDY combined individuals that were both single and multiple antibody positive, which represent distinct risk profiles [11,12]. Therefore, assessment of the microbiota in only high-risk multiple antibody-positive individuals and longitudinally across the transition between stages of prediabetes in larger cohorts is still needed.

Back to Top | Article Outline

FUNCTIONAL DYSBIOSIS IMPLICATES ALTERED SHORT-CHAIN FATTY ACID PRODUCTION IN TYPE 1 DIABETES

It is possible that while there may be a high degree of taxonomic variability in the gut microbiota, common functional features may be associated with T1D. Previous studies in humans, nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice, and virus-induced rat models of T1D have supported a decrease in microbial production of SCFA as contributing to disease risk [4,5,13,14]. SCFAs such as butyrate, acetate and propionate have many reported beneficial properties for the host including promoting mucous production, antimicrobial peptide production and promoting colonic regulatory T cells (Tregs) [15]. Analysis of functional potential using metagenomics on 783 TEDDY individuals indicated that the metagenome of control children had more genes involved in fermentation and SCFA synthesis compared with T1D individuals [9▪▪]. de Groot et al.[16] found decreased abundance of butyrate producers in the stool of long-standing T1D individuals (n = 53) relative to healthy controls (n = 50). Aberrant SCFA production was supported by decreased levels of acetate and propionate in the blood, although SCFA levels in the stool did not differ between groups, and by a decreased ratio of the butyryl-CoA : acetate-CoA transferase gene. Together these new data support that reduced SCFA synthesis is associated with T1D and future clinical studies could be aimed at promoting SCFA delivery to the gut.

Back to Top | Article Outline

HOST–MICROBIOTA INTERACTIONS IN TYPE 1 DIABETES

A demonstration that dysbiosis of the microbiota in T1D is linked to changes in the intestinal barrier function, the gut immune response or inflammation in the pancreas has been challenging. We utilized fecal metaproteomics to interrogate the relationship between microbial dysbiosis and host proteins derived from the gut and pancreas of healthy controls and IAb- relatives (n = 51) compared with IAb+ (N = 17) and recent-onset T1D (n = 33) individuals [17▪]. Multivariate analysis found highly significant differences were present in both the human and microbial derived proteomes of T1D compared with controls with IAb+ individuals presenting an intermediate phenotype. Host proteins (galectin-3 and fibrillin-1) potentially associated with inflammation were upregulated in new-onset cases. The pancreatic enzymes CELA3A and CUZD1 were decreased in T1D and the IAb+ group, suggesting a deterioration of the exocrine pancreas precedes clinical diagnosis. IgA and CLCA1 (a constituent of the mucin layer), were significantly lower in the IAb+ cases. Integration of the metaproteomics with microbial abundance data revealed that microbial taxa enriched in healthy individuals correlated with proteins involved in maintaining the mucus barrier, microvilli adhesion and exocrine pancreas function. Although current metaproteomics techniques can only identify a fraction of the microbial proteins present, this approach may allow a better understanding of host–microbiota interactions. Validation in additional cohorts, preferably longitudinal, is required to better understand these findings.

Back to Top | Article Outline

IDENTIFICATION OF DISEASE PROTECTIVE TAXA: LESSONS FROM ANIMAL MODELS

The NOD mouse model of T1D spontaneously develops autoimmune diabetes with a highly variable onset which has been exploited to study associations between gut microbial taxa and disease risk. Hu et al.[18] observed higher alpha-diversity in the gut microbiota of disease-free NOD mice compared with mice that later progressed to disease. Taxonomic changes were driven by an increase in members of Firmicutes and a decrease in Bacteroidetes in mice that developed disease. Significant associations between the gut but not the oral or vaginal microbiota were found with diabetes development, reinforcing the importance of the gut in T1D. Hänninen et al.[19▪▪] compared the faecal microbiota of high and low-disease incidence NOD colonies. Similar to Hu et al., they observed higher alpha-diversity and a higher Bacteroidetes to Firmicutes ratio in the mice with reduced disease progression. Significantly, while they were able to significantly increase community diversity by cohousing mice from the high and low-incidence colonies, not all taxa were effectively transferred and disease incidence was not altered. Remarkably, introduction of one of the ‘missing’ taxa, Akkermansia muciniphila, significantly delayed disease onset which was accompanied by increased mucous production, reduced crypt length and decreased serum lipopolysaccharide. This was consistent with the described function of A. muciniphila as a mucin degrader and stimulator of mucin production leading to improved gut barrier function [20]. Introduction of A. muciniphila resulted in altered abundance of other taxa suggesting that a single species may drive changes in the wider community structure by altering the nutritional and inflammatory landscape of the gut.

Back to Top | Article Outline

ORIGINS OF DYSBIOSIS IN TYPE 1 DIABETES

The composition of the gut microbiota is determined by environmental, genetic and stochastic influences [21]. Understanding the origin of microbial dysbiosis in T1D is crucial to enable effective targeting of the microbiota as a therapeutic approach.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Host genetics

If genetic susceptibility to T1D contributes to shaping the gut microbiota, then this may pose a barrier to introduction of a ‘healthy’ microbiota. In accordance with this, passive transfer of microbiota by cohousing susceptible NOD mice with disease resistant C57BL/6 mice led to only modest shifts in the microbial composition and did not alter disease incidence [22]. This suggests that the NOD gut environment is inhospitable to certain taxa and that genetic background may bias towards a NOD-associated community composition. Supporting this, we found that six independent NOD colonies had a more similar gut microbiota to each other than to genetically disparate C57BL/6 colonies [23▪]. We tested whether T1D susceptibility contributed to shaping the gut microbiota by using congenic NOD mice that carry protective alleles of T1D susceptibility loci, namely the major histocompatibility complex (MHC), Idd3 (IL2) and the Idd5 (Ctla4, Acadl and Slc11a1) [24–26]. Idd3 and Idd5 protective alleles improve Treg function and immune tolerance [27,28]. NOD mice carrying both Idd3 and Idd5 protective alleles had a highly disparate microbiota composition to control NOD mice, including increased A. muciniphila abundance [23▪]. This was accompanied by increased mucous production and decreased immune infiltration within the lamina propria. In contrast, variation in the MHC resulted in only minor alterations in the gut microbiota. Silverman et al.[29] examined NOD mice carrying a disease protective MHC-II Eα16 gene and found an increase in alpha diversity and compositional changes (albeit modest) in the NOD-Eα16 mice compared with control littermates. Significant disease protection was transferrable to offspring from Eα16 mothers but not fathers supporting that these changes were functionally meaningful. These data argue that T1D genetic susceptibility contributes to shaping the gut microbiota and that even modest changes in the microbial composition may have profound effects on disease progression.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Environment

Although host genetics contributes to sculpting the gut ecosystem, external players are thought to contribute far more potently to community variation [30]. Major factors that influence the development of the gut microbiota in young children include the mother's microbiota, infant diet and acute events that can perturb the microbiota such as infection and antibiotics. The mother's microbiota is in turn shaped by many life events resulting in intergenerational effects. Currently, the most robust evidence supports infant diet, particularly age of exposure to solid foods and probiotic use as contributing to T1D risk [31–34]. Although, it should be noted that these behaviours have strong associations with sociodemographic factors, making it difficult to unravel the true causative events [35].

The increasing use of antibiotics has led to close scrutiny of their role in T1D. A single course of the macrolide antibiotic tylosin-tartrate administered during early life to NOD pups was able to accelerate T1D incidence in male mice, which are usually relatively protected [36▪]. A short antibiotic exposure was sufficient to induce long-term remodelling of the gut microbiota, including increased abundance of several pathobionts. These antibiotic mediated changes were sex-specific and linked to an altered functional potential of the metagenome and gene expression changes in the host gut including in immune-response pathways. This suggests that the early-life period may be a sensitive time for disruption of pathways leading to autoimmunity and sex should be considered in future analyses of the impact of antibiotics. It is of note that long-term treatment with another low-dose antibiotic (penicillin) did not accelerate disease [37]. In human studies, the most recent large-scale cohorts have not found associations with early-life antibiotic exposure and increased islet autoimmunity [38,39]. Therefore, other early-life factors may have greater importance in structuring the gut microbiota in human populations.

Back to Top | Article Outline

MANIPULATING THE MICROBIOTA THROUGH PROBIOTICS

Early probiotic supplementation initiated during the first month of life has been linked to decreased risk of progression to islet autoimmunity in the TEDDY study [34]. Significantly, protection was only seen in children with a high-risk human leukocyte antigen (HLA) DR3/4 genotype. The probiotics used varied but mainly contained mixtures of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species. Recent analysis of the microbiome development in the TEDDY cohort found that infant probiotic exposure was a significant covariate associated with microbiome variance across a range of ages, at least at the genus level [8▪▪]. In a clinical trial conducted in Finland, a probiotic containing L. rhamnosus, Bifidobacterium breve and Propionibacterium freudenreichii was given to pregnant mothers and their infants from birth in a protocol designed to investigate protection from allergy [40]. In this cohort (n = 1223), 14 children progressed to T1D and 25 became IAb+ during the 13-year follow-up but no effect of probiotics was seen. Although this study was not powered to investigate T1D, it suggests that this combination of probiotics may not be protective. Potentially, stratification by HLA genotype may be required to see a beneficial effect from probiotics. HLA risk genotype has been reported to impact development of commensal-specific antibodies providing a possible mechanism for the influence of HLA on the microbiota [41▪▪]. In NOD mice, administration of a probiotic bacteria Clostridium butyricum resulted in highly significant disease protection [42]. This was accompanied by increases in gut-homing Tregs in the mesenteric and pancreatic lymph nodes as well as in microbial genes involved in butyrate production. Hence, a wider range of probiotic species may need to be tested in human clinical trials for their ability to modulate the microbiota composition and prevent T1D.

Back to Top | Article Outline

IMMUNOTHERAPY ALTERS THE INTESTINAL IMMUNE RESPONSE TO THE MICROBIOTA

The composition of the gut microbiota is modulated by two-way interactions with the intestinal immune system. Reductions in the proportion of Tregs and increased inflammatory cytokines have been described in the small intestine of T1D individuals [43,44]. Therefore, immunotherapies that modulate the innate or adaptive immune system may change the intestinal immune response and the composition of the gut microbiota. To verify this, we used low-dose IL-2 therapy, which robustly expands Tregs and protects NOD mice from T1D [45]. IL-2 treatment expanded Tregs within the intestine, increased goblet cell mucous production and reduced intestinal immune infiltration as well as altering the gut microbiota composition [23▪]. Likewise, inhibiting innate immune activation either with IL-1R blockade or a histone deacetylase inhibitor in a rat model of T1D also induced potent alterations in the gut microbiota [46]. Modulation of the gut microbiota by immunotherapy may be a surrogate marker of response to therapy, without contributing itself to disease protection. Yu et al.[47▪▪] investigated this using tolerogenic anti-CD3 therapy. They showed that anti-CD3 expands IL-10 producing type 1 regulatory T (Tr1) cells in the small intestine. These intestinal Tr1 cells were able to suppress T1D development in a disease transfer model and the Tr1 cells were able to migrate from the colon to the pancreas. These data support that induction of immune regulation within the gut is able to limit the autoimmune response within the pancreas.

Back to Top | Article Outline

CONCLUSION

Evidence is now solidifying around a functional dysbiosis with a reduced potential to produce SCFAs linked to T1D. Future work to more precisely identify health-associated taxa, their functional potential and methods to promote colonization of these strains into the gut is needed. Methods to deliver SCFA to the gut are of key interest for new therapies. Such microbiome targeted therapies may be combined with immunotherapies for maximum benefit. Many other questions remain of interest including the role of intestinal viruses in this interplay. Altogether, current evidence validates that the gut microbiota plays an important role in the pathogenesis of T1D.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Acknowledgements

None.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Financial support and sponsorship

E.E.H.-W. is funded by a Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (JDRF) career development fellowship, JDRF grants 3-SRA-2019-730-S-B, 2-SRA-2019-703-M-B and Children's Hospital Foundation grant WIS0202018. This research was carried out at the Translational Research Institute, Woolloongabba, QLD 4102, Australia. The Translational Research Institute is supported by a grant from the Australian Government.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES AND RECOMMENDED READING

Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • ▪ of special interest
  • ▪▪ of outstanding interest
Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Patterson CC, Dahlquist GG, Gyurus E, et al. Incidence trends for childhood type 1 diabetes in Europe during 1989–2003 and predicted new cases 2005–20: a multicentre prospective registration study. Lancet 2009; 373:2027–2033.
2. Rewers M, Ludvigsson J. Environmental risk factors for type 1 diabetes. Lancet 2016; 387:2340–2348.
3. Alkanani AK, Hara N, Gottlieb PA, et al. Alterations in intestinal microbiota correlate with susceptibility to type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 2015; 64:3510–3520.
4. Brown CT, Davis-Richardson AG, Giongo A, et al. Gut microbiome metagenomics analysis suggests a functional model for the development of autoimmunity for type 1 diabetes. PLoS One 2011; 6:e25792.
5. de Goffau MC, Luopajarvi K, Knip M, et al. Fecal microbiota composition differs between children with beta-cell autoimmunity and those without. Diabetes 2013; 62:1238–1244.
6. Giongo A, Gano KA, Crabb DB, et al. Toward defining the autoimmune microbiome for type 1 diabetes. ISME J 2011; 5:82–91.
7. Kostic AD, Gevers D, Siljander H, et al. The dynamics of the human infant gut microbiome in development and in progression toward type 1 diabetes. Cell Host Microbe 2015; 17:260–273.
8▪▪. Stewart CJ, Ajami NJ, O’Brien JL, et al. Temporal development of the gut microbiome in early childhood from the TEDDY study. Nature 2018; 562:583–588.

The study uses amplicon sequencing to describe the longitudinal development of the gut microbiota in 903 children at risk of type 1 diabetes (T1D). They show the importance of a variety of early-life covariates such as breast-feeding and birth mode on the microbiota and show subtle changes in the microbiota linked to T1D development. This is the largest study to date of the human gut microbiota development in any field.

9▪▪. Vatanen T, Franzosa EA, Schwager R, et al. The human gut microbiome in early-onset type 1 diabetes from the TEDDY study. Nature 2018; 562:589–594.

The study uses whole metagenome analysis of 783 children at risk of T1D to describe changes in the composition and functional potential of the microbiota associated with risk of T1D. The size and geographical breadth of this study along with the highly significant finding of functional commonality linked to T1D risk in the face of taxonomic variability make this a must-read article of outstanding interest.

10. Vehik K, Fiske SW, Logan CA, et al. Methods, quality control and specimen management in an international multicentre investigation of type 1 diabetes: TEDDY. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2013; 29:557–567.
11. Ziegler AG, Rewers M, Simell O, et al. Seroconversion to multiple islet autoantibodies and risk of progression to diabetes in children. JAMA 2013; 309:2473–2479.
12. Insel RA, Dunne JL, Atkinson MA, et al. Staging presymptomatic type 1 diabetes: a scientific statement of JDRF, the Endocrine Society, and the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 2015; 38:1964–1974.
13. Marino E, Richards JL, McLeod KH, et al. Gut microbial metabolites limit the frequency of autoimmune T cells and protect against type 1 diabetes. Nat Immunol 2017; 18:552–562.
14. Needell JC, Ir D, Robertson CE, et al. Maternal treatment with short-chain fatty acids modulates the intestinal microbiota and immunity and ameliorates type 1 diabetes in the offspring. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0183786.
15. Makki K, Deehan EC, Walter J, Backhed F. The impact of dietary fiber on gut microbiota in host health and disease. Cell Host Microbe 2018; 23:705–715.
16. de Groot PF, Belzer C, Aydin O, et al. Distinct fecal and oral microbiota composition in human type 1 diabetes, an observational study. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0188475.
17▪. Gavin PG, Mullaney JA, Loo D, et al. Intestinal metaproteomics reveals host–microbiota interactions in subjects at risk for type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2018; 41:2178–2186.

Uses a novel approach of metaproteomics to interrogate the relationship between the host and the microbiota in T1D. Demonstrates that altered exocrine pancreas, mucosal barrier and inflammation proteins are associated with T1D risk and the microbiota.

18. Hu Y, Peng J, Li F, et al. Evaluation of different mucosal microbiota leads to gut microbiota-based prediction of type 1 diabetes in NOD mice. Sci Rep 2018; 8:15451.
19▪▪. Hänninen A, Toivonen R, Poysti S, et al. Akkermansia muciniphila induces gut microbiota remodelling and controls islet autoimmunity in NOD mice. Gut 2018; 67:1445–1453.

Makes significant progress by directly identifying that Akkermansia muciniphila can delay disease onset and reduce immune activation in nonobese diabetic mice. This shows a causal link to preventing T1D development from a taxa that is also present in the healthy human gut.

20. Everard A, Belzer C, Geurts L, et al. Cross-talk between Akkermansia muciniphila and intestinal epithelium controls diet-induced obesity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013; 110:9066–9071.
21. Walter J, Ley R. The human gut microbiome: ecology and recent evolutionary changes. Ann Rev Microbiol 2011; 65:411–429.
22. Mullaney JA, Stephens JE, Geeling BE, Hamilton-Williams EE. Early-life exposure to gut microbiota from disease-protected mice does not impact disease outcome in type 1 diabetes susceptible NOD mice. Immunol Cell Biol 2019; 97:97–103.
23▪. Mullaney JA, Stephens JE, Costello ME, et al. Type 1 diabetes susceptibility alleles are associated with distinct alterations in the gut microbiota. Microbiome 2018; 6:35.

Demonstrates that immune variation linked to T1D that controls immune regulation also impacts gut immunity and the structure of the microbiota. Implicates genetics as well as environment in causing dysbiosis in T1D.

24. Wicker LS, Appel MC, Dotta F, et al. Autoimmune syndromes in major histocompatibility complex (MHC) congenic strains of nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice. The NOD MHC is dominant for insulitis and cyclophosphamide-induced diabetes. J Exp Med 1992; 176:67–77.
25. Yamanouchi J, Rainbow D, Serra P, et al. Interleukin-2 gene variation impairs regulatory T cell function and causes autoimmunity. Nat Genet 2007; 39:329–337.
26. Hunter K, Rainbow D, Plagnol V, et al. Interactions between Idd5.1/Ctla4 and other type 1 diabetes genes. J Immunol 2007; 179:8341–8349.
27. James CR, Buckle I, Muscate F, et al. Reduced interleukin-2 responsiveness impairs the ability of Treg cells to compete for IL-2 in nonobese diabetic mice. Immunol Cell Biol 2016; 94:509–519.
28. Hamilton-Williams EE, Martinez X, Clark J, et al. Expression of diabetes-associated genes by dendritic cells and CD4 T cells drives the loss of tolerance in nonobese diabetic mice. J Immunol 2009; 183:1533–1541.
29. Silverman M, Kua L, Tanca A, et al. Protective major histocompatibility complex allele prevents type 1 diabetes by shaping the intestinal microbiota early in ontogeny. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017; 114:9671–9676.
30. Rothschild D, Weissbrod O, Barkan E, et al. Environment dominates over host genetics in shaping human gut microbiota. Nature 2018; 555:210–215.
31. Chmiel R, Beyerlein A, Knopff A, et al. Early infant feeding and risk of developing islet autoimmunity and type 1 diabetes. Acta Diabetol 2015; 52:621–624.
32. Virtanen SM, Kenward MG, Erkkola M, et al. Age at introduction of new foods and advanced beta cell autoimmunity in young children with HLA-conferred susceptibility to type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia 2006; 49:1512–1521.
33. Ziegler AG, Schmid S, Huber D, et al. Early infant feeding and risk of developing type 1 diabetes-associated autoantibodies. JAMA 2003; 290:1721–1728.
34. Uusitalo U, Liu X, Yang J, et al. Association of early exposure of probiotics and islet autoimmunity in the TEDDY Study. JAMA Pediatr 2016; 170:20–28.
35. Andren Aronsson C, Uusitalo U, Vehik K, et al. Age at first introduction to complementary foods is associated with sociodemographic factors in children with increased genetic risk of developing type 1 diabetes. Matern Child Nutr 2015; 11:803–814.
36▪. Zhang XS, Li J, Krautkramer KA, et al. Antibiotic-induced acceleration of type 1 diabetes alters maturation of innate intestinal immunity. Elife 2018; 7: e37816.

Advances our understanding of how antibiotics may influence islet autoimmunity in a sex-specific manner. Shows that even a short-course of antibiotics during early-life has a long-lasting impact.

37. Livanos AE, Greiner TU, Vangay P, et al. Antibiotic-mediated gut microbiome perturbation accelerates development of type 1 diabetes in mice. Nat Microbiol 2016; 1:16140.
38. Kemppainen KM, Vehik K, Lynch KF, et al. Association between early-life antibiotic use and the risk of islet or celiac disease autoimmunity. JAMA Pediatr 2017; 171:1217–1225.
39. Haupt-Jorgensen M, Morgen CS, Jess T, et al. Maternal antibiotic use during pregnancy and type 1 diabetes in children – a national prospective cohort study. Diabetes Care 2018; 41:e155–e157.
40. Savilahti E, Harkonen T, Savilahti EM, et al. Probiotic intervention in infancy is not associated with development of beta cell autoimmunity and type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia 2018; 61:2668–2670.
41▪▪. Paun A, Yau C, Meshkibaf S, et al. Association of HLA-dependent islet autoimmunity with systemic antibody responses to intestinal commensal bacteria in children. Sci Immunol 2019; 4: eaau8125.

Demonstrates that individuals with T1D or islet antibodies have altered patterns of microbiota-specific antibodies and this is HLA-dependent. This clearly demonstrates the immune response to the microbiota is altered in T1D and demonstrates an effect of HLA genetic risk.

42. Jia L, Shan K, Pan LL, et al. Clostridium butyricum CGMCC0313.1 protects against autoimmune diabetes by modulating intestinal immune homeostasis and inducing pancreatic regulatory T cells. Front Immunol 2017; 8:1345.
43. Pellegrini S, Sordi V, Bolla AM, et al. Duodenal mucosa of patients with type 1 diabetes shows distinctive inflammatory profile and microbiota. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2017; 102:1468–1477.
44. Badami E, Sorini C, Coccia M, et al. Defective differentiation of regulatory FoxP3+ T cells by small-intestinal dendritic cells in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 2011; 60:2120–2124.
45. Tang Q, Adams JY, Penaranda C, et al. Central role of defective interleukin-2 production in the triggering of islet autoimmune destruction. Immunity 2008; 28:687–697.
46. Needell JC, Dinarello CA, Ir D, et al. Implication of the intestinal microbiome as a potential surrogate marker of immune responsiveness to experimental therapies in autoimmune diabetes. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0173968.
47▪▪. Yu H, Gagliani N, Ishigame H, et al. Intestinal type 1 regulatory T cells migrate to periphery to suppress diabetogenic T cells and prevent diabetes development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017; 114:10443–10448.

A key advance by directly showing that regulatory cells can migrate from the colon to the pancreas to inhibit islet autoimmunity. Provides rationalle for linking immunotherapy to monitoring the gut microbiota.

Keywords:

environmental drivers; intestinal immunity; islet autoimmunity; microbiota; type 1 diabetes

Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.