Lessons to learn from epidemiologic studies in ARDS : Current Opinion in Critical Care

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

RESPIRATORY SYSTEM: Edited by Michael Quintel and Luciano Gattinoni

Lessons to learn from epidemiologic studies in ARDS

McNicholas, Bairbre A.a,b; Rooney, Grainne M.b; Laffey, John G.b,c,d,e

Author Information
Current Opinion in Critical Care 24(1):p 41-48, February 2018. | DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000473

Abstract

Purpose of review 

Recent advances in our understanding of the epidemiology of ARDS has generated key insights into the incidence, risk factors, demographics, management and outcomes from this devastating clinical syndrome.

Recent findings 

ARDS occurs in 10% of all ICU patients, in 23% of all mechanically ventilated patients, with 5.5 cases per ICU bed each year. Although some regional variation exists regarding ARDS incidence, this may be less than previously thought. Subphenotypes are increasingly identified within the ARDS cohort, with studies identifying a ‘hyperinflammatory’ or ‘reactive’ subgroup that has a higher mortality, and may respond differently to therapeutic interventions. Demographic factors, such as race, may also affect the therapeutic response. Although mortality in ARDS is decreasing in clinical trials, it remains unchanged at approximately 40% in major observational studies. Modifiable ventilatory management factors, including PEEP, airway pressures, and respiratory rate are associated with mortality in ARDS. Hospital and ICU organizational factors play a role in outcome, whereas socioeconomic status is independently associated with survival in patients with ARDS. The Kigali adaptation of the Berlin ARDS definition may provide useful insights into the burden of ARDS in the developing world.

Summary 

ARDS exerts a substantial disease burden, with 40% of patients dying in hospital. Diverse factors, including patient-related factors such as age and illness severity, country level socioeconomic status, and ventilator management and ICU organizational factors each contribute to outcome from ARDS. Addressing these issues provides opportunities to improve outcome in patients with ARDS.

Copyright © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

You can read the full text of this article if you:

Access through Ovid