Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Resuscitation fluids

Casey, Jonathan D.; Brown, Ryan M.; Semler, Matthew W.

Current Opinion in Critical Care: December 2018 - Volume 24 - Issue 6 - p 512–518
doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000551
EMERGENCIES IN CRITICAL CARE: Edited by Wesley H. Self
Buy

Purpose of review Intravenous fluid administration is a fundamental therapy in critical care, yet key questions remain unanswered regarding optimal fluid composition and dose. This review evaluates recent evidence regarding the effects of fluid resuscitation on pathophysiology, organ function, and clinical outcomes for critically ill patients.

Recent findings Recent findings suggest that intravenous fluid composition affects risk of kidney injury and death for critically ill adults. Generally, the risk of kidney injury and death appears to be greater with semisynthetic colloids compared with crystalloids, and with 0.9% sodium chloride compared with balanced crystalloids. Whether a liberal, restrictive, or hemodynamic responsiveness-guided approach to fluid dosing improves outcomes during sepsis or major surgery remains uncertain.

Summary As evidence on fluid resuscitation evolves, a reasonable approach would be to use primarily balanced crystalloids, consider 2–3 l for initial fluid resuscitation of hypovolemic or distributive shock, and use measures of anticipated hemodynamic response to guide further fluid administration.

Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA

Correspondence to Matthew W. Semler, MD, MSc, 1161 21st Ave S., C-1216 MCN, Nashville, TN 37232-2650, USA. Tel: +1 615 322 3412; e-mail: matthew.w.semler@vanderbilt.edu

Copyright © 2018 YEAR Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.