All the studies examined measures of muscle strength. Two studies showed improvement in leg press [18,19], but in both DHEA treatment was combined with exercise. Nevertheless, similar numbers of studies had negative results for this endpoint. Four studies also examined measures of physical performance. Only one study showed improvement in a composite score measuring physical performance ; the rest reported no differences between DHEA and control for any. All together these trials suggest improvement in muscle strength or function especially in women but only when DHEAS treatment is combined with exercise.
As previously reported, one of the mechanisms by which DHEA exerts its anabolic effects is the transformation into testosterone rather than estradiol (Fig. 1). The anabolic properties of testosterone in the skeletal muscle have been tested in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) (Table 2).
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL ON TESTOSTERONE AND SARCOPENIA IN OLDER MEN
Ottenbacher et al.  in a meta-analysis published in 2006 evaluated the most important RCT addressing the effects of testosterone on muscle function. The findings from 11 RCTs were examined using the methods of meta-analysis to determine whether androgen treatment [testosterone/5α-dihydrotestosterone (DHT)] increased strength in men aged 65 years and older . This was the first synthesis on the effect of testosterone/DHT on strength in older men using only randomized, double-blind trials. A moderate increase in muscle strength was found in patients on testosterone/DHT therapy versus placebo group. The average patient in the treatment condition receiving testosterone performed better than approximately 19.3% of the placebo group. More recent studies including periods of treatment ranging from 20 weeks to 24 months, not included in the Ottenbacher et al. study, are summarized in Table 2. Kenny et al.  in 2010 investigated in a double-blind RCT the effects of testosterone supplementation on body composition, muscle, physical function, and safety in 131 men (mean age 77.1) with low testosterone, history of fracture, or bone mineral density with T-score −2.0 SD or less and frailty. Participants received 5 mg/day of testosterone or placebo for 12–24 months; all received calcium (1500 mg/day diet and supplement) and cholecalciferol (1000 IU/day). Ninety-nine men (75.6%) completed 12 months, and 62 (47.3%) ended the therapy (mean 23 months; range 16–24 months for 62 who completed therapy). Study adherence was 54%, with 40% of patients maintaining 70% adherence. Total and bioavailable testosterone at 12 months was 583 and 157 ng/dl, respectively, in the treatment group. There was an increase in lean mass and a decrease in fat mass in the testosterone group, but, no differences in strength or physical performance, and safety parameters.
These findings were somewhat confirmed by Srinivas-Shankar et al.  who tested the effects of 6-months testosterone treatment in an intermediate frail population of 24 healthy, community-dwelling older men (60–85 years) of testosterone 12 nmol/l or less or free testosterone 250 pmol/l or less. Transdermal hydro-alcoholic testosterone gel (Testogel 1%) at a dose of 50 mg/day for 6 months improved lower limb muscle strength, body composition, quality of life, and physical function. More convincing data come from the Testosterone in Older Men with Mobility Limitations (TOM) Trial [23▪▪,24]. The aim of this placebo-controlled randomized trial was to determine whether testosterone therapy in 209 community-dwelling men affected by severe limitation in mobility with a mean age of 74 years and low testosterone level [100–350 ng/dl (3.5–12.1 nmol/l)] improves lower extremity muscle strength and physical function. Participants were randomized to placebo or 10 g testosterone gel daily for 6 months. Primary outcome was leg-press strength. Secondary outcomes included chest-press strength, stair-climb, 40-m walk, muscle mass, and physical activity. Of the 209 randomized participants, 165 had follow-up efficacy measures. Mean (SD) age was 74 (5.4) years and Short Physical Performance Battery Score 7.7 (1.4). Testosterone arm exhibited greater improvements in leg-press strength, chest-press strength and power, and loaded stair-climb than placebo. Compared with placebo, a significantly greater proportion of men receiving testosterone improved their leg-press and chest-press strengths (43 versus 18%; P = 0.01) and stair-climbing power (28 versus 10%; P = 0.03) more than a minimally important difference. Increases in leg-press strength and stair-climbing power were associated with changes in testosterone levels. Physical activity, walking speed, self-reported function, and fatigue did not change. Despite the significant increases in the muscle strength among elderly men, given the high doses of testosterone, the risks outweighed the benefits [23▪▪]. Adverse cardiovascular events, categorized according to The Medical Dictionary of Regulatory Activities (MedDRA), occurred in 11 of the 106 men receiving testosterone, compared to 1 of 103 men receiving placebo. The excess of cardiovascular events in the testosterone group led the data and safety monitoring board to recommend early termination of the study .
These results were surprising because meta-analysis of previous trials of testosterone therapy have not shown significant increases in cardiovascular risk with testosterone therapy . These and other potential complications (thrombotic and risk of prostate cancer) along with data from RCT showing only small effects on strength and physical function in older men underline the need for safer and more effective compounds .
STRATEGIES TO ATTENUATE THE DETRIMENTAL EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH TESTOSTERONE TREATMENT OF SARCOPENIA
To deal with the potential failure of sex hormone replacement treatment, a number of interesting strategies have been advocated in the current literature. These approaches are summarized in Figure 3. They include the correct selection of route of administration and the dosage, the ideal population to target, the intermittent interventions and the use of selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMS), and finally the combination with nutritional supplementation and exercise.
SELECTION OF THE OLDER POPULATION TO TREAT AND NEED FOR INDIVIDUALIZED DOSAGE
In our opinion, the critical aspect for testosterone therapy is the appropriate identification of the population suitable for the replacement therapy. In a recent analysis performed in the InCHIANTI population, which is a representative sample of older Italian men, participants were grouped according to testosterone levels in severely hypogonadal, moderately hypogonadal and eugonadal as suggested by the most recent recommendations of Late-Onset Hypogonadism (LOH) in older men [27▪,28]. According to these guidelines testosterone levels below 230 ng/dl identified patients to be treated. We found a significant difference in hemoglobin levels and muscle strengths between individuals with different testosterone status . Zitzmann et al.  tried to identify a threshold linking testosterone levels and specific symptoms of testosterone deficiency. The urgent need for specific cut-off to be used for replacement therapy is also suggested by Emmelot-Vonk et al. . These authors found that 6-months testosterone in older men with low-normal testosterone concentration did not affect functional status or cognition but increased lean body mass and had mixed metabolic effects. However, the cut-off of the testosterone used in this study to identify hypogonadal patients is questionable as the dosage to reach the anabolic or anticatabolic action without undesirable effects is still debated. The baseline characteristics of the population to treat are also of interest. The testosterone group of TOM study had a higher prevalence of hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and statin use before interventions, suggesting that coexisting illnesses should be taken into account during participant recruitment, and the definition of LOH proposed by Wu et al.  as a detached testosterone deficiency syndrome related to sexuality alone does not appear to reflect accurately the complexity of the aging male patient.
Another important critical point is the dosage and the route of administration of testosterone that should be chosen in older individuals. In TOM study the authors started with transdermal administration (which is the recommended way of administration) at the highest recommended level of 10 g of testosterone per day, titrating up to 15 g/day in some patients [to achieve testosterone levels of 500–1000 ng/dl (1.74–34.7 nmol/l)]. However, the usual procedure for testosterone substitution by gel would be to start at 5 g and titrate up to 10 g/day, which is consistent with the official international guidelines for the use of this preparation [28,32].
Caution is necessary, especially in older men who have a history of cardiovascular disease and immobility and in all men (young and old), when using higher testosterone doses than recommended.
Meanwhile, many attempts have been performed to attenuate the side-effects associated with testosterone treatment and in order to verify what mechanisms mediate the sex hormone action on muscle level.
An important issue concerns the higher potential risk of prostate dysfunction associated with testosterone treatment. Steroid 5α-reductase inhibitors are used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia and androgenic alopecia, but the role of DHT in mediating testosterone's effects on muscle, sexual function, erythropoiesis, and other androgen-dependent processes remains poorly understood. These authors determined whether testosterone's effects on muscle mass, strength, and prostate volume are attenuated when its conversion to DHT is blocked by dutasteride (an inhibitor of 5α-reductase type 1 and 2). The 5α-Reductase Trial was a RCT of healthy men aged 18–50 years, comparing placebo and testosterone enanthate with dutasteride and testosterone enanthate. Eight treatment groups received 50, 125, 300, or 600 mg/week of testosterone enanthate for 20 weeks and placebo (four groups) or 2.5 mg/day of dutasteride (four groups). The primary outcome was change in fat-free mass, secondary outcomes among others, changes in fat mass, muscle strength, and prostate volume. A total of 139 men were randomized; 102 completed the 20-week intervention. The mean fat-free mass gained by the dutasteride group was 0.6 kg when receiving 50 mg/week of testosterone enanthate, 2.6 kg for 125 mg/week, 5.8 kg for 300 mg/week, and 7.1 kg for 600 mg/week. The mean fat-free mass gained by the placebo groups was 0.8 kg when receiving 50 mg/week of testosterone enanthate, 3.5 kg for 125 mg/week, 5.7 kg for 300 mg/week, and 8.1 kg for 600 mg/week. Changes in fat mass, muscle strength, and prostate volume did not differ between the groups. Changes in fat-free mass in response to graded testosterone doses did not differ in men in whom DHT (which is the main determinant of prostate dysfunction) was suppressed by dutasteride from those treated with placebo, indicating that conversion of testosterone to DHT is not essential for mediating its anabolic effects on muscle [33▪▪].
CONTINUOUS VERSUS INTERMITTENT ANDROGEN INTERVENTIONS
Cycling androgens is another interesting option to obtaining the anabolic effects without significant side-effects. This strategy is based on the option chosen by athletes to improve physical performance by enhancing muscle mass and strength. This paradigm has been recently studied in older men being treated with testosterone. Sheffield-Moore and Dillon [34▪▪] investigated the efficacy of a monthly cycled testosterone regimen that uses half the testosterone dose as the current standard of care of continuous therapy on body composition and muscle strength in older men. Twenty-four community-dwelling older men 70 ± 2 years of age with total testosterone levels below 500 ng/dl were randomized into a 5-month double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Patients were dosed weekly for 5 months, receiving continuous testosterone (n = 8; 100 mg testosterone enanthate, i.m. injection); monthly cycled testosterone (n = 8; alternating months of testosterone and placebo); or placebo (n = 8). The main outcomes of the study included the evaluation of body composition by Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry and upper and lower body muscle strength. Secondary outcomes included body weight, serum hormones, and mixed-muscle protein fractional synthesis rate (FSR). Total lean body mass was increased and percentage fat was reduced after 5 months in continuous testosterone and monthly cycled testosterone (P < 0.05). Upper body muscle strength increased in continuous testosterone, and lower body muscle strength increased in continuous testosterone and monthly cycled testosterone (P < 0.05). FSR increased in continuous testosterone and monthly cycled testosterone (P < 0.05), but not in placebo. Cycled testosterone improved body composition and increased muscle strength compared with placebo and increased FSR similarly to continuous testosterone.
These results are extremely interesting because they help us to understand the timing of the anabolic and anticatabolic response of testosterone and provide new insight into the novel strategies to improve safety of testosterone treatment. In particular, skeletal muscle protein synthesis accounted for the anabolic effects of testosterone at 1 month, but at 6 months, net anabolism resulted from inhibition of skeletal muscle breakdown. In addition, in the presence of testosterone concentrations from the lower half to the upper half of the normal range in a monthly cycled paradigm, skeletal muscle FSR remained consistently elevated in healthy older men. Thus, if monthly on/off cycles of testosterone can consistently increase muscle protein synthesis and lean body mass without an increase in side-effects, then this paradigm would offer a significant treatment for preventing sarcopenia in older men.
The concerns about potential adverse effects of testosterone on prostate and, recently, at cardiovascular level, have also motivated the development of selective androgen receptor modulators that display tissue-selective activation of androgenic signaling.
SELECTIVE ANDROGEN RECEPTOR MODULATORS AND MUSCLE FUNCTION
These nonsteroidal compounds, called selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMS), have shown tissue-selective activity and improved pharmacokinetic properties. Many SARMS are currently under investigation in both men and women . Of particular interest is the recent study conducted by Basaria et al. [35▪] from Boston University who tested the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and effects of ascending doses of a novel nonsteroidal, oral selective androgen receptor modulator (LGD-4033) on lean body mass, muscle strength, stair-climbing power, and sex hormones of healthy young-adult men. LGD-4033 binds the androgen receptor with high affinity and selectivity. In this placebo-controlled study, 76 healthy men (21–50 years) were randomized to placebo or 0.1, 0.3, or 1.0 mg LGD-4033 daily for 21 days. Hormones, lean and fat mass and muscle strength were measured during and for 5 weeks after intervention. LGD-4033 was well tolerated without serious adverse events that were not different between active and placebo groups. Hemoglobin, prostate-specific antigen, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, or QT intervals did not change significantly at any dose. Lean body mass increased dose-dependently, but fat mass did not change significantly. Hormone levels and lipids returned to baseline after treatment discontinuation. LGD-4033 was well tolerated, had favorable pharmacokinetic profile, and increased lean body mass even during this short period without change in prostate-specific antigen. However, how these preliminary interesting results obtained in young-adult men can be translated in older patients with comorbidities and concurrent medications is still unclear. Longer randomized trials should evaluate its efficacy in improving physical function and health.
Alternative approaches aimed at improving the effectiveness of sex hormone treatment in sarcopenia in older men are the object of current studies and include the combination of testosterone, exercise and nutritional supplementation. This is of particular concern especially in older people with malnutrition and polypharmacotherapy. Epidemiological studies showed that micronutrients such as magnesium are determinants of muscle strength and function, and the use of nutritional supplement is very well known among young-adult athletes to improve physical performance . Moreover, in older men of the InCHIANTI population magnesium serum levels have been positively associated with anabolic hormones including testosterone [37▪] supporting its potential clinical use of adjuvant anabolic support in an older population. Preliminary intervention studies provide evidence to this concept. Chapman et al.  nicely showed in a small group of undernourished older men and women that combined treatment with testosterone and nutritional supplementation reduces the number of people hospitalized and the duration of hospital admissions [39▪]. These preliminary data suggest that targeting muscle and function should be one of the main goals of daily pharmacological approach in older patients with multimorbidity. One example is offered by older patients affected by prostate cancer, where long-term Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) is associated with sarcopenia, insulin resistance, and increased risk of fractures . In these patients continuous monitoring by a multiprofessional team of geriatricians, endocrinologists, and oncologists is needed to balance risks and benefits of ADT. These concepts also apply to older patients undergoing major surgery, especially cardiac surgery with extracorporeal circulation, where assessment of body composition and muscle function  should become a cornerstone for future strategies, including sex hormones, to improve the recovery and length of stay [42▪].
As reported some years ago by The Institute of Medicine (IOM) report Testosterone and Aging there is a profound need for additional, large, carefully carried out trials of testosterone administration in well characterized groups of older men to more clearly outline benefits (muscle strength, avoidance of falls) and risk (prostate, cardiovascular) of treatment. Since sarcopenia is a multifactorial process, new clinical trials in older men should adopt multi-intervention including, in addition to testosterone and/or selective modulators, exercise and nutritional supplementation and targeting the new criteria of sarcopenia.
We thank Dr Chiara Cattabiani, Dr Alessandro Vignali, Francesca De Vita, Professor Elisabetta Dall’Aglio, and Dr Valeria Buttò for their strong support in the review of the literature and their help in editing this manuscript.
We also acknowledge the relevant technical support of Pietro Schianchi and Maurizio Conca. The figures and tables presented in this manuscript are original and not published elsewhere.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES AND RECOMMENDED READING
Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:
- ▪ of special interest
- ▪▪ of outstanding interest
Additional references related to this topic can also be found in the Current World Literature section in this issue (p. 109).
1. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, et al. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing 2010; 39:412–423.
2. Morley JE, Abbatecola AM, Argiles JM, et al. Society on Sarcopenia, Cachexia and Wasting Disorders Trialist Workshop. Sarcopenia with limited mobility: an international consensus. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2011; 12:403–409.
3. Muscaritoli M, Anker SD, Argilés J, et al. Consensus definition of sarcopenia, cachexia and precachexia: joint document elaborated by Special Interest Groups (SIG) ‘cachexia-anorexia in chronic wasting diseases’ and ‘nutrition in geriatrics’. Clin Nutr 2010; 29:154–159.
4▪. Sakuma K, Yamaguchi A. Sarcopenia and age-related endocrine function. Int J Endocrinol 2012; 127362.
This review summarizes the contribution of catabolic and anabolic mediators to sarcopenia with particular emphasis on endocrine function.
5. Maggio M, Lauretani F, Ceda GP, et al. Relationship between low levels of anabolic hormones and 6-year mortality in older men: the aging in the Chianti Area (InCHIANTI) study. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167:2249–2254.
6. Maggio M, Cattabiani C, Lauretani F, et al. The concept of multiple hormonal dysregulation. Acta Biomed 2010; 81 (Suppl 1):19–29.
7. Stewart CE, Pell JM. Point: Counterpoint: IGF is/is not the major physiological regulator of muscle mass. Point: IGF is the major physiological regulator of muscle mass. J Appl Physiol 2010; 108:1820–1821.
8. Wagers AJ, Conboy IM. Cellular and molecular signatures of muscle regeneration: current concepts and controversies in adult myogenesis. Cell 2005; 122:659–667.
9. Serra C, Tangherlini F, Rudy S, et al.
Testosterone improves the regeneration of old and young mouse skeletal muscle. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2012 [Epub ahead of print].
10▪▪. Dubois V, Laurent M, Boonen S, et al. Androgens and skeletal muscle: cellular and molecular action mechanisms underlying the anabolic actions. Cell Mol Life Sci 2012; 69:1651–1667.
This is an outstanding review summarizing molecular mechanisms by which androgens exert the anabolic actions focusing on genomic and not genomic mechanisms and their cross-talk with other molecules.
11. Malkin CJ, Pugh PJ, Jones RD, et al. The effect of testosterone replacement on endogenous inflammatory cytokines and lipid profiles in hypogonadal men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004; 89:3313–3318.
12▪▪. Grossmann MJ. Low testosterone in men with type 2 diabetes: significance and treatment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011; 96:2341–2353.
The author in this review addresses the vicious cycle between low testosterone levels and diabetes showing also recent and ongoing intervention trials testing the effect of testosterone on insulin sensitivity and diabetes.
13. Fernández-Balsells MM, Murad MH, Lane M, et al. Clinical review 1: adverse effects of testosterone therapy in adult men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010; 95:2560–2575.
14▪. Baker WL, Karan S, Kenny AM. Effect of dehydroepiandrosterone on muscle strength and physical function in older adults: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc 2011; 59:997–1002.
Interesting review of RCT using DHEA treatment in adult-older men and women having as target reliable measure of muscle strength and physical performance.
15. Kenny AM, Boxer RS, Kleppinger A, et al. Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) improves muscle strength and physical function but not bone mineral density in frail older women. J Am Geriatr Soc 2010; 58:1707–1714.
16. Igwebuike A, Irving BA, Bigelow ML, et al. Lack of dehydroepiandrosterone effect on a combined endurance and resistance exercise program in post menopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008; 93:534–538.
17. Muller M, van den Beld AW, van der Schouw YT, et al. Effects of dehydroepiandrosterone and atemestane supplementation on frailty in elderly men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006; 91:3988–3991.
18. Nair KS, Rizza RA, O’Brien P, et al. DHEA in elderly women and DHEA or testosterone in elderly men. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:1647–1659.
19. Villareal DT, Holloszy JO. DHEA enhances effects of weight training on muscle mass and strength in elderly women and men. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2006; 291:E1003–E1008.
20. Ottenbacher KJ, Ottenbacher ME, Ottenbacher AJ, et al. Androgen treatment and muscle strength in elderly men: a meta-analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc 2006; 54:1666–1673.
21. Kenny AM, Kleppinger A, Annis K, et al. Effects of transdermal testosterone on bone and muscle in older men with low bioavailable testosterone levels, low bone mass, and physical frailty. J Am Geriatr Soc 2010; 58:1134–1143.
22. Srinivas-Shankar U, Roberts SA, Connolly MJ, et al. Effects of testosterone on muscle strength, physical function, body composition, and quality of life in intermediate-frail and frail elderly men: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010; 95:639–650.
23▪▪. Travison TG, Basaria S, Storer TW, et al. Clinical meaningfulness of the changes in muscle performance and physical function associated with testosterone administration in older men with mobility limitation. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2011; 66:1090–1099.
This is the first RCT on testosterone treatment performed in older men with mobility limitation using the gold standard measures of muscle function and physical performance. The study showed significant improvement in these outcomes but was stopped because of higher rates of cardiovascular events in testosterone group.
24. Basaria S, Coviello AD, Travison TG, et al. Adverse events associated with testosterone administration. N Engl J Med 2010; 363:109–122.
25. Haddad RM, Kennedy CC, Caples SM, et al. Testosterone and cardiovascular risk in men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials. Mayo Clin Proc 2007; 82:29–39.
26. Bhasin S, Calof OM, Storer TW, et al. Drug insight: testosterone and selective androgen receptor modulators as anabolic therapies for chronic illness and aging. Nature Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab 2006; 2:146–159.
27▪. Maggio M, Ceda GP, Lauretani F, et al. Gonadal status and physical performance in older men. Aging Male 2011; 14:42–47.
Cross-sectional analysis addressing how the measures and determinants of physical performance (muscle strength and hemoglobin above all) are different according to gonadal status. This study is useful for the definition of ideal testosterone levels to be related with sarcopenia.
28. Wang C, Nieschlag E, Swerdloff RS, et al. ISA, ISSAM, EAU, EAA and ASA recommendations: investigation, treatment and monitoring of late-onset hypogonadism in males. Aging Male 2009; 12:5–12.
29. Zitzmann M, Faber S, Nieschlag E. Association of specific symptoms and metabolic risks with serum testosterone in older men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006; 91:4335–4343.
30. Emmelot-Vonk MH, Verhaar HJ, Nakhai Pour HR, et al. Effect of testosterone supplementation on functional mobility, cognition, and other parameters in older men: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Assoc 2008; 299:39–52.
31. Wu FC, Tajar A, Beynon JM, et al. Identification of late-onset hypogonadism in middle-aged and elderly men. N Engl J Med 2010; 363:123–135.
32. Bhasin S, Cunningham GR, Hayes FJ, et al. Testosterone therapy in men with androgen deficiency syndromes: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010; 95:2536–2559.
33▪▪. Bhasin S, Travison TG, Storer TW, et al. Effect of testosterone supplementation with and without a dual 5(-reductase inhibitor on fat-free mass in men with suppressed testosterone production: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Assoc 2012; 307:931–939.
Elegant and original RCT with two important clinical implications. Testosterone increases fat-free mass independent of its conversion into dihydrotestosterone and this approach can be used to determine its potential neutral effect on prostate function.
34▪▪. Sheffield-Moore M, Dillon EL, Casperson SL, et al. A randomized pilot study of monthly cycled testosterone replacement or continuous testosterone replacement versus placebo in older men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011; 96:E1831–E1837.
Original pilot study that shows an interesting option to improve the safety of testosterone treatment in older men and highlights the timing of intervention and the onset of anabolic and anticatabolic mechanisms.
35▪. Basaria S, Collins L, Dillon EL, et al.
The safety, pharmacokinetics, and effects of LGD-4033, a novel nonsteroidal oral, selective androgen receptor modulator, in healthy young men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2012 [Epub ahead of print].
Preliminary but interesting RCT using 21-day treatment of ascending doses of a novel selective androgen receptor modulator showing significant increase in lean body mass even during this short period without change in fat mass and prostate-specific antigen.
36. Dominguez LJ, Barbagallo M, Lauretani F, et al. Magnesium and muscle performance in older persons: the InCHIANTI study. Am J Clin Nutr 2006; 84:419–426.
37▪. Maggio M, Ceda GP, Lauretani F, et al. Magnesium and anabolic hormones in older men. Int J Androl 2011; 34:e594–e600.
Observational cross-sectional study showing a strong independent association between magnesium levels and anabolic hormones including testosterone. These results suggest the need of nutritional supplementation with magnesium to modulate anabolic status in older individuals and create the basis for multi-intervention in older individuals with sarcopenia.
38. Chapman IM, Visvanathan R, Hammond AJ, et al. Effect of testosterone and a nutritional supplement, alone and in combination, on hospital admissions in undernourished older men and women. Am J Clin Nutr 2009; 89:880–889.
39▪. Piantadosi C, Visvanathan R, Naganathan V, et al. The effect of testosterone and a nutritional supplement on hospital admissions in under-nourished, older people. BMC Geriatr 2011; 11:66.
Pilot study showing that combined treatment with an oral testosterone and a supplement drink was well tolerated and safe, and reduced the number of people hospitalized and duration of hospital admissions in undernourished, community dwelling older people.
40. Basaria S, Bhasin S. Targeting the skeletal muscle-metabolism axis in prostate-cancer therapy. N Engl J Med 2012; 367:965–967.
41. Afilalo J, Eisenberg MJ, Morin JF, et al. Gait speed as an incremental predictor of mortality and major morbidity in elderly patients undergoing cardiac surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 56:1668–1676.
42▪. Maggio M, Nicolini F, Cattabiani C, et al.
Effects of testosterone supplementation on clinical and rehabilitative outcomes in older men undergoing on-pump CABG. Contemp Clin Trials 2012; 33:730–738
Keywords:© 2013 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
DHEAS; older men; sarcopenia; testosterone