TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND SAFETY: Edited by Stephan A. LoerAwake videolaryngoscopy versus fiberoptic bronchoscopyMoore, Albert; Schricker, Thomas Author Information Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Victoria Hospital, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Correspondence to Albert Moore, MD, MSc, Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Victoria Hospital, McGill University Health Center, 1001 Decarie Boulevard, Montreal, QC, Canada H4A 3J1. Tel: +1 514 934 1934 x34880;. e-mail: [email protected] Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology: December 2019 - Volume 32 - Issue 6 - p 764-768 doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000771 Buy Metrics Abstract Purpose of review The difficult airway remains an ongoing concern in daily anesthesia practice, with awake intubation being an important component of its management. Classically, fiberoptic bronchoscope-assisted tracheal intubation was the method of choice in the awake patient. The development of new generation videolaryngoscopes has revolutionized the approach to tracheal intubation in the anesthetized patient. The question whether videolaryngoscopes have a place in the intubation of the difficult airway in the awake patient is currently being addressed. Recent findings Randomized controlled trials and their meta-analysis have shown that videolaryngoscopes provide similar success rates and faster intubation times when compared with fiberoptic bronchoscope intubation in awake patients with difficult airways. Summary Videolaryngoscopy is a valid technique that should be considered for difficult airway management in the awake patient. Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.