Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Brain function differences in drug-naïve first-episode auditory verbal hallucination-schizophrenia patients with versus without insight

Chen, Min1,2; Zhuo, Chuan-Jun3; Ji, Feng1; Li, Gong-Ying1; Ke, Xiao-Yan2

Section Editor(s): Chen, Xin

doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000419
Original Articles
Open

Background: Few studies have reported brain function differences in drug-naïve first-episode schizophrenia patients who had auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH) with insight vs. those without insight. This study aimed to investigate brain function differences between drug-naïve first-episode AVH-schizophrenia patients with and without insight.

Methods: Forty first-episode drug-naïve AVH-schizophrenia patients with or without insight and 40 healthy controls between December 2016 and December 2018 were recruited in this study. The auditory hallucinations rating scale (AHRS) was used to assess AVH severity, while the insight and treatment attitudes questionnaire was used to distinguish insight. The global functional connectivity density (gFCD) between different groups was compared using a voxel-wise one-way analysis of covariance. The relationship between gFCD and AHRS total scores were analyzed using voxel-wise multiple regression.

Results: Finally, 13 first-episode drug-naïve AVH-schizophrenia patients with insight, 15 AVH-schizophrenia patients without insight, and 20 healthy controls were included for analysis. Except for global assessment of functioning scores, there were no significant differences in sociodemographic information between the AVH-schizophrenia and healthy groups (P > 0.05). Compared to the healthy controls, AVH-schizophrenia patients with insight demonstrated a decreased gFCD in the supra-marginal gyrus within the primary auditory cortex, while those without insight demonstrated an increased gFCD in the inferior frontal gyrus and superior temporal gyrus and decreased gFCD in the supplemental motor area. Compared to the AVH-schizophrenia patients with insight, those without insight demonstrated an increased gFCD in the supra-marginal gyrus and posterior superior temporal lobule and a decreased gFCD in the frontal lobe. No significant correlation between gFCD and AVH severity (AHRS total score: r = 0.23, P = 0.590; and frequency: r = 0.42, P = 0.820) was found in both AVH-schizophrenia groups.

Conclusions: The gFCD-aberrant brain regions in the AVH-schizophrenia patients without insight were wider compared to those with insight, although the AHRS scores were not significantly different. The AVH-schizophrenia patients without insight had wide functional impairment in the frontal lobule, which may underlie the lack of insight and the abnormal hyperactivity in the inferior frontal gurus and temporal lobe related to the AVH symptoms.

1Department of Psychiatry, School of Mental Health, Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong 272000, China

2Department of Psychiatry, Nanjing Brain Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, China

3Psychiatric-Neuroimaging-Genetics-Comorbidity Laboratory (PNGC Lab), Tianjin Mental Health Centre, Mental Health Teaching Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin Anding Hospital, Tianjin 300222, China.

Correspondence to: Prof. Xiao-Yan Ke, Department of Psychiatry, Nanjing Brain Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Naijing, Jiangsu 210029, ChinaE-Mail: chmankanghospital@126.com

How to cite this article: Chen M, Zhuo CJ, Ji F, Li GY, Ke XY. Brain function differences in drug-naïve first-episode auditory verbal hallucination-schizophrenia patients with versus without insight. Chin Med J 2019;00:00–00. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000419

Received 19 May, 2019

Min Chen and Chuan-Jun Zhuo contributed equally to this work.

Online date: August 30, 2019

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0

Back to Top | Article Outline

Introduction

The prevalence of auditory verbal hallucinations (AVHs) is reported to occur in 70% of patients with schizophrenia.[1] AVH is a disabling and even fatal symptom of schizophrenia, as it can cause extreme suffering that leads to self-harm and suicidal behavior.[1,2] Hence, there is an urgent need to understand the mechanisms of AVHs as well as the pathological features and treatment strategies of AVHs in schizophrenia patients.[3] The International Consortium on Hallucination Research investigated AVHs from multiple perspectives in 2013.[4–6] In the last decade, many studies have focused on investigating AVHs in schizophrenia. These studies have reported many important findings and established hypotheses to explain the mechanisms of AVHs from different perspectives. These studies provided pivotal evidence to further investigate AVHs, particularly co-pathological features and other symptoms of AVHs.[7–10]

Previous studies of AVHs in patients with schizophrenia found that poor insight could cause AVH deterioration and increase treatment difficulty. More notably, poor insight and reciprocal AVHs deteriorated over time in schizophrenia; however, good insight could help alleviate AVHs in schizophrenia patients.[11–13] These studies indicated that the relationship between insight and AVHs could influence treatment outcomes of mental disorders.[14,15] Some studies have reported that insight accompanied by structural and functional brain alterations could influence treatment outcomes.[16–18] Other studies reported that some brain alterations influenced treatment efficacy of AVHs in patients with schizophrenia.[19–23] The abovementioned studies suggested that insight and AVHs were both associated with structural and functional brain aberrations and some aberrant brain regions (temporal lobule, frontal lobule, parietal lobule) that were associated with insight and AVH overlap, which might cause poor insight and persistent AVH reciprocal deteriorations, resulting in treatment difficulty. Conversely, good insight might positively affect AVH treatment in patients with schizophrenia and improve treatment outcomes.[22–25] Therefore, understanding the common and distinct brain pathological features of insight and AVHs in patients with schizophrenia could help us understand brain functional activity associated with AVHs and insight, and develop personalized treatment strategies.

As a voxel-wise data-driven method, functional connectivity density (FCD) mapping is widely used to test the density distribution of whole-brain resting-state functional connectivity, especially global FCD (gFCD), which can reflect the brain's ability to communicate to different extents.[26] Thompson et al[27] reported that gFCD could act as a potential biomarker for quantitative state changes in glucose metabolism. In fact, gFCD is usually used to investigate brain functional connectivity alterations in some mental disorders[28,29] and provides more information to understand aberrant brain function associated with AVHs in schizophrenia.[30] Thus, in this study, we adopted gFCD to investigate the common and distinct aberrant brain functional patterns in drug-naïve first-episode AVH-schizophrenia patients with or without insight and analyzed the gFCD differences between the two groups.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Methods

Ethical approval

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of School of Mental Health, Jining University. All participants were given detailed information about the study process and purpose and provided signed informed consent before their enrollment in this study.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Subjects

A total of 40 AVH-schizophrenia patients with or without insight via advertising recruitment of our hospitalized patients, outpatients and 40 healthy controls from staffs of hospital between December 2016 and December 2018 were enrolled in the study. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) abnormal perception that completely satisfied the AVH criteria such as “Did you at any time hear voices saying quite a few words or sentences when there was no one around that might account for it?”; (2) completely satisfied the schizophrenia diagnosis criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual and Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV), and the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV (SCI-D) was conducted by two senior psychiatrists with more than 10 years’ experience; (3) a first episode not treated with any anti-psychotic agents 2 weeks before participating in this study; and (4) intelligence quotient (IQ) ≥ 80. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients with other psychotic or affective disorders, mental retardation, alcohol dependence, drug dependence, organic brain lesions, or physical and neurological diseases; (2) with history of unconsciousness for more than 5 min for any reason; (3) contraindications for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination; (4) claustrophobia; or (5) IQ <80. All subjects were right-handed. The healthy controls were distinguished by two professional psychiatrists using the SCI-D non-patient version that no psychological symptoms were observed in the last 6 months according to DSM-IV. All psychiatrists were trained to use SCI-D every 2 weeks, and the mean intra-class correlations were all above 0.85.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Assessment of AVH severity

The auditory hallucinations rating scale (AHRS) was used to assess AVH severity in patients with AVH-schizophrenia.[31] Regarding psychiatric assessments, all subjects were examined by a trained psychiatrist for affective and other psychotic symptoms using positive and negative symptom scales.[32] Global functioning was estimated using the global assessment of functioning (GAF) scale.[33] GAF was scored as the highest level of functioning over the past year defined by the lowest score for social, psychological, or professional functioning. Psychiatric disorders in the participants’ family members were quantified using the family interview for genetic studies.[34] Urine samples were obtained to screen for drug abuse (cannabis, amphetamine, cocaine, methadone, heroine, and other substances). A positive screen for any of these substances led to exclusion. Individuals who had family members with psychiatric disorders were also excluded. Regarding insight, the insight and treatment attitudes questionnaire (ITAQ)[35] was used to distinguish individuals with AVHs with insight from those without insight. ITAQ scores = 22 were defined as good, while ITAQ scores = 0 were defined as no insight. In this study, we excluded subjects with unclear insight or a positive family history.

Back to Top | Article Outline

MRI data acquisition

MRI scans were performed using a 3T GE Discovery MR750 scanner (General Electric, Milwaukee, WI, USA) equipped with an eight-channel phased-array head coil. The participants were instructed to lie down in a supine position and rest without falling asleep during the scan. Whole-brain resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) data depicting blood oxygen level-dependent signals were obtained using a gradient-echo-planar imaging sequence with the following parameters: repetition time (TR) = 2000 ms; echo time (TE) = 45 ms; slices = 32; slice thickness = 4 mm; gap = 0.5 mm; field of view (FOV) = 220 × 220; matrix size = 64 × 64; and flip angle (FA) = 90°. All scans were acquired by parallel imaging using the sensitivity encoding technique with a factor of 2. Structural images were obtained with a high-resolution 3D turbo-fast-echo T1-weighted imaging sequence with the following parameters: 188 slices; TR/TE = 8.2/3.2; slice thickness = 1 mm; no gap; FA = 12°; matrix size = 256 × 256; and FOV = 256 × 256.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Data pre-processing

SPM8 was used to process the rs-fMRI scans (http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm). To allow for imaging unit stabilization and subject familiarization, the first ten volumes of scans were discarded. The remaining volumes were corrected for slice-timing and motion artifacts. Head translation movement for all participants was <2 mm, while rotation was less than 2°. Covariates including head motion, white matter signal, and cerebrospinal fluid signal were regressed out from the time series of every voxel. The Friston 24-parameter model was used to regress out head motion effects. Next, framewise displacement (FD) was calculated and the data were regressed out of the study if the FD of a specific volume was >0.5. The datasets were filtered with band-pass frequencies of 0.01 to 0.08 Hz. Individual structural images were co-registered to the mean functional image, and the transformed structural images were co-registered to the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space using linear registration. The motion-corrected functional volumes were spatially normalized to the MNI space using parameters estimated during the linear co-registration. Finally, the functional images were re-sampled into 3-mm cubic voxels for further analysis.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Calculation of gFCD

The FCD of each voxel was calculated using an in-house Linux script as previously reported.[36] Functional connectivity between the voxels was evaluated using Pearson's linear correlation with a correlation coefficient threshold of R > 0.6.[26,36] The gFCD calculations were limited to those voxels within the cerebral gray matter mask, and the gFCD at any given voxel (x0) was calculated as the total number of functional connections, denoted as k(x0), between x0 and all other voxels using a growth algorithm, which was repeated for all of the x0 voxels. Next, gFCD was divided by the mean value of the qualified voxels in the brain to increase the normality of the distribution. The FCD maps were spatially smoothed with a 6 mm × 6 mm × 6 mm Gaussian kernel to minimize inter-subject differences in the functional anatomy of the brain.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using the IBM SPSS software for Macintosh, version 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The Group differences in gFCD among the three groups were tested using a voxel-wise one-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with age, sex, education level, and GAF scores as covariates followed by post hoc inter-group comparisons. The post hoc inter-group comparisons were conducted within a mask showing gFCD differences from the ANCOVA analysis. To investigate the relationship between gFCD and the insight total scores, a voxel-wise multiple regression analysis was conducted in the AVH-schizophrenia with insight group within regions showing significant gFCD differences vs. the other two groups. Sex, age, GAF scores, and education level were considered nuisance covariates. Multiple comparisons were also corrected using family-wise error-corrected method.[37] Differences in demographic measurements among the three groups were examined using the Chi-square test (sex) or one-way analysis of variance (age) in this study. The differences between patients with AVH-schizophrenia with insight vs. those without insight were tested using the two-sample t test. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05

Back to Top | Article Outline

Results

The MRI data of only 13 AVH-schizophrenia patients with insight and 15 AVH-schizophrenia patients without insight were included in final analysis. MRI data for 20 age, sex, and educational level matched healthy controls were used for comparisons [Figure 1]. Except for GAF scores, there were no significant differences in sociodemographic information between the AVH-schizophrenia and healthy groups (P > 0.05) [Table 1].

Figure 1

Figure 1

Table 1

Table 1

Back to Top | Article Outline

gFCD analysis

A voxel-wise ANCOVA analysis revealed that the intergroup differences in gFCD were mainly located in the supra-marginal gyrus, primary auditory cortex, inferior frontal gyrus, superior temporal gyrus, and supplementary motor area [Figure 2A and 2B]. Compared to the healthy controls, AVH-schizophrenia patients with insight demonstrated a decreased gFCD in the primary auditory cortex of the supra-marginal gyrus [Figure 2A], while the AVH-schizophrenia patients without insight demonstrated an increased gFCD in the inferior frontal gyrus and superior temporal gyrus and a decreased gFCD in the supplementary motor area [Figure 2B]. Compared to the AVH-schizophrenia patients with insight, the AVH-schizophrenia patients without insight demonstrated an increased gFCD in the supra-marginal gyrus and posterior superior temporal lobe and a decreased gFCD in the frontal lobule [Figure 2C]. Our findings demonstrated that the AVH-schizophrenia patients without insight had wider functional connectivity impairments in most components of the frontal lobule, which might be one reason for the loss of insight.

Figure 2

Figure 2

Another notable finding of this pilot study was that AVH-schizophrenia patients without insight demonstrated an increased gFCD in the inferior frontal gyrus and superior temporal gyrus compared to those with insight. The brain regions of these patients were differently and more widely affected than those patients with AVH-schizophrenia with insight, although the AHRS scores were not significantly different. These findings suggest that AVH-related brain functional alterations in AVH-schizophrenia patients with insight vs. those without insight might be different. However, because our sample is very small, future studies are needed to validate our findings.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Correlation analysis

There was no significant correlation between gFCD and AVH severity (AHRS total score: r = 0.23, P = 0.590; and frequency: r = 0.42, P = 0.820) in the AVH-schizophrenia groups.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Discussion

This small study described the brain functional connectivity alterations in first-episode drug-naïve AVH-schizophrenia patients with or without insight. We found that AVH-schizophrenia with or without insight had different aberrant gFCD patterns and that patients with insight had wider functional activity and metabolism throughout the frontal lobe. The frontal lobe is the pivotal hub of information processing in the brain, and impairments in functional connectivity can influence memory, judgment, analysis, thinking, and operation processing of the brain, subsequently causing disturbances in each area and reciprocally influencing these functions. The abovementioned disturbances cause cognitive and executive dysfunction in patients with schizophrenia.[38–42] Our findings indicated that lack of insight might be related to functional impairment of the frontal lobe in AVH-schizophrenia patients. Future studies with large-sample sizes are needed to clarify these findings.

Another significant point of this study was that the aberrant brain regions in the patients without insight were wider than those in the patients with insight. AVH-schizophrenia patients without insight demonstrated an increased gFCD in the inferior frontal gyrus and superior temporal gyrus compared to those with insight. The inferior frontal gyrus, superior temporal gyrus, and supra-marginal gyrus participate in AVH processing.[9,43,44] We postulated that the intergroup differences might be related to the pathological features of insight; a decreased gFCD in the frontal lobe might deteriorate the functional activity in the temporal and inferior frontal gyrus, thus the abnormal activity of these regions could not be inhibited, reflected as an increased gFCD in these regions. This postulation requires further studies to clarify, despite many AVH hypotheses supporting the disinhibit postulation. The brain disinhibit hypothesis was postulated to explain one of the sources of AVH, and this hypothesis has been supported by some previous findings.[45–49] However, these findings were based on patients with anti-psychotic treatment, which might influence brain activity. Hence, “clear” patients are needed to fully explore the source of AVH. In the present study, drug-naïve patients were enrolled to avoid anti-psychotics influence. Our findings provided new evidence on which to base further study.

The third notable finding of this study was that we did not find a relationship between AHRS score and gFCD alterations. Previous studies have reported that the relationship between psychotic symptom severity (such as AVH and delusions) and brain functional connectivity number/strength was very complex; some studies reported correlations, whereas others did not.[50–51] Similarly, we did not find any correlations in the present study. Our findings were based on drug-naïve first-episode patients. Therefore, our findings provided some evidence to support the none-correlations concept, which considered symptom-related aberrant brain activity as one of a trait feature, and not state features.

Although we used gFCD analysis in this study to examine the whole-brain intrinsic functional architecture with a sample of AVH-schizophrenia patients with insight vs. those without insight, the present study had some limitations. First, the small sample size might limit the significance of our findings, but still provided a path for further study. Second, this was a cross-sectional study, and thus we could not characterize the dynamic trajectory of the brain functional alterations and AVH alterations accompanying treatment. Hence, a cohort study is needed to clarify the trajectory, investigate the precise treatment target, and provide more useful information for clinical practice.

In conclusion, this study found that the gFCD-aberrant brain regions in AVH-schizophrenia patients without insight differed from and were more widespread than those in AVH-schizophrenia patients with insight, although the AHRS scores were not significantly different. AVH-schizophrenia patients without insight had wide functional impairments throughout the frontal lobe, which might be a reason for lack of insight and abnormal hyperactivity in the inferior frontal gyrus and temporal lobe related to AVH symptoms. Despite its limitations, this study provided some important direction for further studies.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81871052, No. 81801679, and No. 81571319), the Key Projects of the Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin, China (No. 17JCZDJC35700), the Tianjin Health Bureau Foundation (No. 2014KR02), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2016YFC1307004), Tianjin Anding Hospital Outstanding Award Rewarding, and Support Fund for Teachers’ Scientific Research of Jining Medical University (No. JY2017JS007).

Back to Top | Article Outline

Conflicts of interest

None.

Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Upthegrove R, Broome MR, Caldwell K, Ives J, Oyebode F, Wood S. Understanding auditory verbal hallucinations: a systematic review of current evidence. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2016; 133:352–367. doi: 10.1111/acps.12531.
2. Fujita J, Takahashi Y, Nishida A, Okumura Y, Ando S, Kawano M, et al. Auditory verbal hallucinations increase the risk for suicide attempts in adolescents with suicidal ideation. Schizophr Res 2015; 168:209–212. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2015.07.028.
3. Zhuo C, Jiang D, Liu C, Lin X, Li J, Chen G, et al. Understanding auditory verbal hallucinations in healthy individuals and individuals with psychiatric disorders. Psychiatry Res 2019; 274:213–219. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.02.040.
4. Waters F, Woods A, Fernyhough C. Report on the 2nd International Consortium on Hallucination Research: evolving directions and top-10 “hot spots” in hallucination research. Schizophr Bull 2014; 40:24–27. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbt167.
5. International Consortium on Hallucination Research. Available at: https://ichr2017.sciencesconf.org/resource/gallery/id/2. [Accessed July 25, 2019]
6. International Consortium on Hallucination Research. Available at: www.ichr2018kyoto.jp/program.html. [Accessed August 11, 2018]
7. Ćurčić-Blake B, Ford JM, Hubl D, Orlov ND, Sommer IE, Waters F, et al. Interaction of language, auditory and memory brain networks in auditory verbal hallucinations. Prog Neurobiol 2017; 148:1–20. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2016.11.002.
8. Liemburg EJ, Vercammen A, Ter Horst GJ, Curcic-Blake B, Knegtering H, Aleman A. Abnormal connectivity between attentional, language and auditory networks in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2012; 135:15–22. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.12.003.
9. Huang J, Zhuo C, Xu Y, Lin X. Auditory verbal hallucination and the auditory network: from molecules to connectivity. Neuroscience 2019; 410:59–67. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.04.051.
10. Steinmann S, Leicht G, Mulert C. The interhemispheric miscommunication theory of auditory verbal hallucinations in schizophrenia. Int J Psychophysiol 2019; doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.02.002. [Epub ahead of print].
11. Ćurčić-Blake B, van der Meer L, Pijnenborg GH, David AS, Aleman A. Insight and psychosis: functional and anatomical brain connectivity and self-reflection in schizophrenia. Hum Brain Mapp 2015; 36:4859–4868. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22955.
12. Chang CC, Tzeng NS, Chao CY, Yeh CB, Chang HA. The effects of add-on fronto-temporal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on auditory verbal hallucinations, other psychopathological symptoms, and insight in schizophrenia: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2018; 21:979–987. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyy074.
13. Jing RX, Li S, Zhang XJ, Long J, Zhou TH, Zhuo CJ. Aberrant functional connectivity patterns of default mode network may play a key role in the interaction between auditory verbal hallucinations and insight. Chin Med J 2018; 131:736–738. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.226905.
14. Schapir L, Zalsman G, Hasson-Ohayon I, Gaziel M, Morag-Yaffe M, Sever J, et al. Suicide, satisfaction with life, and insight capacity among adolescents with mental disorders. Crisis 2016; 37:347–352. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000403.
15. Gaziel M, Hasson-Ohayon I, Morag-Yaffe M, Schapir L, Zalsman G, Shoval G. Insight and satisfaction with life among adolescents with mental disorders: assessing associations with self-stigma and parental insight. Eur Psychiatry 2015; 30:329–333. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2014.08.003.
16. Respino M, Jaywant A, Kuceyeski A, Victoria LW, Hoptman MJ, Scult MA, Gunning FM, et al. The impact of white matter hyperintensities on the structural connectome in late-life depression: relationship to executive functions. Neuroimage Clin 2019; 23:101852doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101852.
17. Torrisi S, Alvarez GM, Gorka AX, Fuchs B, Geraci M, Grillon C, et al. Resting-state connectivity of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis and the central nucleus of the amygdala in clinical anxiety. J Psychiatry Neurosci 2019; 44:1–11. doi: 10.1503/jpn.180150.
18. Larabi DI, van der Meer L, Pijnenborg GHM, Ćurčić-Blake B, Aleman A. Insight and emotion regulation in schizophrenia: a brain activation and functional connectivity study. Neuroimage Clin 2018; 20:762–771. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.09.009.
19. Bohlken MM, Hugdahl K, Sommer IE. Auditory verbal hallucinations: neuroimaging and treatment. Psychol Med 2017; 47:199–208. doi: 10.1017/S003329171600115X.
20. Hugdahl K. Auditory hallucinations as translational psychiatry: evidence from magnetic resonance imaging. Balkan Med J 2017; 34:504–513. doi: 10.4274/balkanmedj.2017.1226.
21. Kantrowitz JT, Sehatpour P, Avissar M, Horga G, Gwak A, Hoptman MJ, et al. Significant improvement in treatment resistant auditory verbal hallucinations after 5 days of double-blind, randomized, sham controlled, fronto-temporal, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): a replication/extension study. Brain Stimul 2019; 12:981–991. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.03.003.
22. Kubera KM, Rashidi M, Schmitgen MM, Barth A, Hirjak D, Sambataro F, et al. Structure/function interrelationships in patients with schizophrenia who have persistent auditory verbal hallucinations: a multimodal MRI study using parallel ICA. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2019; 93:114–121. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2019.03.007.
23. Pijnenborg GHM, de Vos AE, Timmerman ME, Van der Gaag M, Sportel BE, Arends J, et al. Social cognitive group treatment for impaired insight in psychosis: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Schizophr Res 2018; 206:362–369. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.10.018.
24. Phahladira L, Asmal L, Kilian S, Chiliza B, Scheffler F, Luckhoff HK, et al. Changes in insight over the first 24 months of treatment in schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Schizophr Res 2018; 206:394–399. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.10.013.
25. Zheng Y, Ning Y, She S, Deng Y, Chen Y, Yi W, et al. Psychotic symptoms and attitudes toward medication mediate the effect of insight on personal-social functions in patients with schizophrenia: one-year randomized controlled trial and follow-up. Psychopathology 2018; 51:167–176. doi: 10.1159/000486558.
26. Zou K, Gao Q, Long Z, Xu F, Sun X, Chen H, et al. Abnormal functional connectivity density in first-episode, drug-naive adult patients with major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord 2016; 194:153–158. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.12.081.
27. Thompson GJ, Riedl V, Grimmer T, Drzezga A, Herman P, Hyder F. The whole-brain “global” signal from resting state FMRI as a potential biomarker of quantitative state changes in glucose metabolism. Brain Connect 2016; 6:435–447. doi: 10.1089/brain.2015.0394.
28. Zhuo C, Xu Y, Zhang L, Jing R, Zhou C. The effect of dopamine antagonist treatment on auditory verbal hallucinations in healthy individuals is clearly influenced by comt genotype and accompanied by corresponding brain structural and functional alterations: an artificially controlled pilot study. Front Genet 2019; 10:92doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00092.
29. Li X, Meng H, Fu Y, Du L, Qiu H, Qiu T, et al. The impact of whole brain global functional connectivity density following MECT in major depression: a follow-up study. Front Psychiatry 2019; 10:7doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00007.
30. Cheng L, Zhu J, Ji F, Lin X, Zheng L, Chen C, et al. Add-on atypical anti-psychotic treatment alleviates auditory verbal hallucinations in patients with chronic post-traumatic stress disorder. Neurosci Lett 2019; 701:202–207. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2019.02.043.
31. Wahab S, Zakaria MN, Sidek D, Abdul Rahman AH, Shah SA, Abdul Wahab NA. Evaluation of auditory hallucinations in patients with schizophrenia: a validation study of the Malay version of Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales (PSYRATS). Psychiatry Res 2015; 228:462–467. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.06.014.
32. Tibber MS, Kirkbride JB, Joyce EM, Mutsatsa S, Harrison I, Barnes TRE, et al. The component structure of the scales for the assessment of positive and negative symptoms in first-episode psychosis and its dependence on variations in analytic methods. Psychiatry Res 2018; 270:869–879. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.10.046.
33. Aas IHM, Sonesson O, Torp S. A qualitative study of clinicians experience with rating of the global assessment of functioning (GAF) scale. Community Ment Health J 2018; 54:107–116. doi: 10.1007/s10597-016-0067-6.
34. O’Brien JM, Salowe RJ, Fertig R, Salinas J, Pistilli M, Sankar PS, et al. Family history in the primary open-angle African American glaucoma genetics study cohort. Am J Ophthalmol 2018; 192:239–247. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.03.014.
35. Mohamed S, Rosenheck R, He H, Yuping N. Insight and attitudes towards medication among inpatients with chronic schizophrenia in the US and China. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2014; 49:1063–1070. doi: 10.1007/s00127-014-0824-1.
36. Tomasi D, Volkow ND. Ultrafast method for mapping local functional connectivity hubs in the human brain. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2010; 2010:4274–4277. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5626180.
37. Albajes-Eizagirre A, Solanes A, Vieta E, Radua J. Voxel-based meta-analysis via permutation of subject images (PSI): theory and implementation for SDM. NeuroImage 2019; 186:174–184. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.077.
38. Fukuda Y, Katthagen T, Deserno L, Shayegan L, Kaminski J, Heinz A, et al. Reduced parietofrontal effective connectivity during a working-memory task in people with high delusional ideation. J Psychiatry Neurosci 2019; 44:195–204. doi: 10.1503/jpn.180043.
39. Iimori T, Nakajima S, Miyazaki T, Tarumi R, Ogyu K, Wada M, et al. Effectiveness of the prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cognitive profiles in depression, schizophrenia, and Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2019; 88:31–40. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.06.014.
40. Guo JY, Ragland JD, Carter CS. Memory and cognition in schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatry 2019; 24:633–642. doi: 10.1038/s41380-018-0231-1.
41. Park J, Chun JW, Park HJ, Kim E, Kim JJ. Involvement of amygdala-prefrontal dysfunction in the influence of negative emotion on the resolution of cognitive conflict in patients with schizophrenia. Brain Behav 2018; 8:e01064doi: 10.1002/brb3.1064.
42. Lubeiro A, de Luis-García R, Rodríguez M, Álvarez A, de la Red H, Molina V. Biological and cognitive correlates of cortical curvature in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging 2017; 270:68–75. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2017.10.011.
43. Zweerings J, Hummel B, Keller M, Zvyagintsev M, Schneider F, Klasen M, et al. Neurofeedback of core language network nodes modulates connectivity with the default-mode network: a double-blind fMRI neurofeedback study on auditory verbal hallucinations. Neuroimage 2019; 189:533–542. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.058.
44. Looijestijn J, Blom JD, Hoek HW, Renken R, Liemburg E, Sommer IEC, et al. Draining the pond and catching the fish: uncovering the ecosystem of auditory verbal hallucinations. Neuroimage Clin 2018; 20:830–843. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.09.016.
45. Gaudiot C, Du X, Summerfelt A, Hare SM, Bustillo JR, Rowland LM, et al. A working memory related mechanism of auditory hallucinations. J Abnorm Psychol 2019; 128:423–430. doi: 10.1037/abn0000432.
46. de Boer JN, Linszen MMJ, de Vries J, Schutte MJL, Begemann MJH, Heringa SM, et al. Auditory hallucinations, top-down processing and language perception: a general population study. Psychol Med 2019; 4:1–9. doi: 10.1017/S003329171800380X.
47. Moseley P, Mitrenga KJ, Ellison A, Fernyhough C. Investigating the roles of medial prefrontal and superior temporal cortex in source monitoring. Neuropsychologia 2018; 120:113–123. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.10.001.
48. Heckers S. Studies of auditory verbal hallucinations. Psychophysiology 2016; 53:305–307. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12591.
49. Petersson KM, Gisselgård J, Gretzer M, Ingvar M. Interaction between a verbal working memory network and the medial temporal lobe. Neuroimage 2006; 33:1207–1217. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.07.042.
50. Lui S, Deng W, Huang X, Jiang L, Ma X, Chen H, et al. Association of cerebral deficits with clinical symptoms in antipsychotic-naive first-episode schizophrenia: an optimized voxel-based morphometry and resting state functional connectivity study. Am J Psychiatry 2009; 166:196–205. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08020183.
51. Milev P, Ho BC, Arndt S, Nopoulos P, Andreasen NC. Initial magnetic resonance imaging volumetric brain measurements and outcome in schizophrenia: a prospective longitudinal study with 5-year follow-up. Biol Psychiatry 2003; 54:608–615. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3223(03)00293-2.
Keywords:

Auditory verbal hallucinations; Schizophrenia; Insight; Global functional connectivity density

© 2019 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.