Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Lowering the repeat unplanned revascularization rate after coronary stenting by focusing on the long-term stable control of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

Liu, Jun1; Cao, Zhong-Ying2; Zhang, Bo1; Dong, Zhi-Chao1; Zhang, Wei3

Section Editor(s): Guo, Li-Shao

doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000373
Clinical Observation

1Department of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning 116011, China

2Department of Cardiology, Cangzhou People's Hospital, Cangzhou, Hebei 061000, China

3Department of Geriatrics, First Affiliated Hospital, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning 116011, China.

Correspondence to: Dr. Wei Zhang, Department of Geriatrics, First Affiliated Hospital, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning 116011, ChinaE-Mail:

How to cite this article: Liu J, Cao ZY, Zhang B, Dong ZC, Zhang W. Lowering the repeat unplanned revascularization rate after coronary stenting by focusing on the long-term stable control of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Chin Med J 2019;00:00–00. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000373

Received 22 March, 2019

Jun Liu and Zhong-Ying Cao contributed equally to this work.

Online date: July 24, 2019

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.

Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), after first percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), often need repeat unplanned percutaneous revascularization due to plaque progression in culprit or non-culprit lesions, including target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and other vessel revascularization (OVR).[1] Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels are controllable and its reduction is integral to reducing major adverse cardiac events after PCI. In this study, active lipid-lowering therapy was widely appreciated early after coronary stenting, showing an initial decline in levels of LDL-C, while its emphasis and recognition was attenuated over time with an increased risk of revascularization due to higher levels of LDL-C.

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University. From January 2013 to January 2017, a total of 621 consecutive patients who survived successful PCI with stent implantation on initial admission to our institution, received a second coronary angiography examination due to “suspected/defined myocardial ischemia.” Interval time was recorded between the first PCI and admission for suspected myocardial ischemia. To further explore LDL-C changes in unplanned revascularization following PCI, 111 patients, rehospitalized for any cause, including staged revascularization within 6 months after hospital discharge, were excluded. A total of 510 patients were selected, comprising 101 patients without de novo coronary artery lesions (control group) and 409 patients with repeat unplanned percutaneous revascularization (repeat PCI group). Of the patients with unplanned repeat procedures, 10% (n = 41) were treated for ST-elevation myocardial infarction and 90% (n = 368) for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. A total of 183 of these patients were treated with TLR and 272 with TVR/OVR, of whom 46 were treated with both.

For statistical analyses, we used SPSS 21.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Continuous data were described by mean ± standard deviation and categorical data by median and interquartile range (25th to 75th percentile). We used t tests for comparisons between the two groups of continuous data and Chi-squared tests for comparisons of categorical data. Multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed and adjusted for all relevant clinical variables including the demographics, coronary risk factors, baseline factors, and procedural characteristics. We calculated risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and considered P values less than 0.05 to represent statistical significance.

Baseline characteristics including LDL-C levels were well balanced between the two groups, at the time of first PCI. Patients in the control group had shorter interval times when compared with patients with unplanned repeat PCI (2.0 ± 1.4 years vs. 4.1 ± 3.3 years, P < 0.001). Reduction of LDL-C goals in the control group led to an initial decrease from 108.04 ± 30.77 mg/dL to 87.93 ± 25.62 mg/dL. However, mean LDL-C in patients with unplanned repeat PCI decreased from 108.83 ± 30.05 mg/dL to 96.07 ± 29.10 mg/dL, indicating attenuation of LDL-C control over time. Readmitted patients who had unplanned PCI had higher LDL-C levels compared with controls (P = 0.006). The proportion of LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL with unplanned PCI was also higher (37.4% vs. 25.7%, P = 0.02). Patients who underwent TLR and TVR/OVR had similar LDL-C characteristics to patients who experienced unplanned PCI overall, compared with controls. After multivariable adjustment, LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL during readmission was an independent risk factor for all repeat unplanned PCI, as well as for TLR and TVR/OVR individually [Figure 1].

Figure 1

Figure 1

More than 20% of patients with CAD continue to demonstrate atheroma progression even after achieving very low LDL-C levels.[2] Current lipid-lowering guidelines still recommend LDL-C reduction as a principal target for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease, especially for patients who have had PCI. In clinical practice, active lipid-lowering therapy with statins is often a focus during the first year after PCI; however, its emphasis and recognition is often diluted over time,[3] with an increase in patients with PCI on low statin doses or without statin therapy observed. Going in hand, we observed the changes in type of statin over time. In our study, after multivariable adjustment, an LDL-C level ≥100 mg/dL during readmission was an independent risk factor for all repeat unplanned PCI as well as for TLR and TVR/OVR. The results further highlighted the importance of maintaining low lipid levels for a prolonged follow-up period in patients with CAD after PCI.

Several study limitations should be considered. This was a single-centered, analytical retrospective study. The samples were restricted to patients discharged from our hospital with successful follow-up and repeat angioplasty, which may have resulted in selection biases and conclusions with limited generalizability. The interval times in the repeat revascularization group and controls were different, which may have affected the final comparison and analyses. However, we chose interval time as a survival time variable in the multivariate Cox regression analyses to examine how related risk factors influenced interval time. The study excluded patients with repeat unplanned revascularization of coronary artery bypass grafting, which may have affected the final results. Finally, the study did not investigate the types of lipid-lowering drugs and other variables that may have influenced lesions and PCI procedures. This may have marginally affected our results.

Back to Top | Article Outline


The study was supported by grants from Health and Family planning Commission of Liaoning, China (No. LNCCC-D18-2015) and the Science and Technology Program of Dalian, China (No. 2015E12SF168).

Back to Top | Article Outline

Conflicts of interest


Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Stolker JM, Cohen DJ, Kennedy KF, Pencina MJ, Lindsey JB, Mauri L, et al. Evaluation of Drug-Eluting Stents and Ischemic Events (EVENT) Investigators. Repeat revascularization after contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention: an evaluation of staged, target lesion, and other unplanned revascularization procedures during the first year. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2012; 5:772–782. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.967802.
2. Bayturan O, Kapadia S, Nicholls SJ, Tuzcu EM, Shao M, Uno K, et al. Clinical predictors of plaque progression despite very low levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55:2736–2742. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.01.050.
3. Dykun I, Wiefhoff D, Totzeck M, Al-Rashid F, Jánosi RA, Rassaf T, et al. Disconcordance between ESC prevention guidelines and observed lipid profiles in patients with known coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc 2018; 22:73–77. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2018.12.004.
© 2019 Chinese Medical Association