Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Original Article

Risk Factors for Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Infection and Mortality of Klebsiella pneumoniae Infection

Wang, Zhe1,; Qin, Ran-Ran2,; Huang, Lei1; Sun, Li-Ying1,

Author Information
doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.221267
  • Free

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP) is a pathogen commonly causing nosocomial infection, which is the culprit of hospital-acquired infections including pneumoniae, bloodstream infection, urinary tract infection, and hepatic abscess, especially among immunocompromised people.[123] The usage of carbapenems is increasing dramatically in Chinese hospitals. Carbapenem-resistant KP (CRKP) is more resistant to multiple antimicrobial drugs than carbapenem-susceptible KP (CSKP) isolates. These resistant strains have been the source of hospital-acquired infections among severely ill patients, which exhibits apparently higher mortality than the infections with CSKP.[4]

As the consequence of this, identifying the patients at risk of fatal infection is of crucial importance to the selection and efficacy of the therapies. Additionally, this knowledge is of importance for the design and the implementation of interventions aiming to prevent the spread of antimicrobial resistance.[5]

The aim of the present study was to identify risk factors for CRKP infections and predictors of mortality among KP-infected adult patients.

METHODS

Ethical approval

The retrospective study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University First Hospital. All patients waived to sign the informed content.

Study design

To identify the risk factors for CRKP infections, we conducted a retrospective case-control study at Beijing University First Hospital, China, a tertiary care teaching hospital with 1600 beds. All the adult inpatients (age ≥18 years) with positive cultures of KP (48 h after admission) were selected from the medical records in the hospital's computerized microbiology laboratory database, dated between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2014. The first positive sample of each patient was analyzed in the study.

Patients with CRKP were categorized as the case group, while patients with only CSKP were categorized as the control group. The controls were selected randomly from the source population admitted to the same department during the same time period. To identify the risk factors associated with infections caused by CRKP, clinical variables of the case group were compared with those of the control group. Based on the outcome, all the patients infected with KP were divided into the death group and the survival group.

Antimicrobial susceptibility test

Antimicrobial susceptibilities to various antimicrobial agents, including amikacin, imipenem, meropenem, cefoperazone-sulbactam, cefepime, moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, tigecycline, ceftriaxone, ertapenem, ceftazidime, and piperacillin-tazobactam, were determined by minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) using the E-test. The results were interpreted according to the criteria recommended by the 2012 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. CRKP was defined as an isolate with ertapenem (MICs ≥2 μg/ml), or imipenem and/or meropenem (MICs ≥4 μg/ml). The KP isolates susceptible to ertapenem, imipenem, and meropenem were considered as CSKP.

Detection of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase gene

All the CRKP isolates were subjected to detection of KPC gene using polymerase chain reaction methods as previously described by Tsai et al.[6]

Data collection

All the data in this study came from medical records, which were reviewed and collected if identified as KP positive 48 h after admission. The following data were retrieved from medical records of each patient: demographics (age and sex), comorbidities and underlying diseases (cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, hepatic, central nervous system disease, diabetes mellitus, solid tumor or hematological malignancy, and immunocompromised), severity of illness classified by the Charlson comorbidity score, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay prior to KP isolation, history of hospitalization within the previous 6 months, antibiotic therapy administered in the 30 days prior to the positive culture, recent (≤1 month) surgical procedures, special treatments (corticosteroids, chemotherapy, and blood products), and recent (≤7 days) invasive procedures (central venous, urinary or gastric catheterization intubation, parenteral nutrition, mechanical ventilation, hemodialysis, and biopsy puncture). Time at risk was defined as the length of stay prior to a positive culture for the two groups and the total length of hospitalization for the control group.

Statistical analysis

Described and compared indicators of population groups’ index were between different groups. Continuous variables were described as mean ± standard deviation (SD), which was compared using the Student's t-test. They were compared with the Mann-Whitney U-test if their distributions were not normal. Ranked data using the median (interquartile spacing) description are compared between the groups using Wilcoxon signed-rank test and inspection. Categorical variables were compared with a Pearson's Chi-square test or a Chi-square test with a continuity correction if the frequency is <5. Two sets of data from the two groups of participants were compared using independent samples t-test.

We established a univariable logistic regression model to explore the relationship between disease and research indicators. Multiple stepwise regression analysis was used to match multivariable logistic regression model. Stepwise regression analysis values of which standard P ≤ 0.05 were included, excluding those of which standard P > 0.05. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve was evaluated under multivariable logistic regression model with prediction effect. We calculated the odds ratios (ORs) and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the dichotomous categorical variables with CRKP or CSKP infection as the dependent variable. To identify the independent risk factors, variables with P < 0.05 in the univariable analysis were included in multivariable logistic regression model and analyzed using backward step-wise regression. We also calculated Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistics. Null hypothesis was rejected if a type of Klebsiella was included in the model as an independent factor. Two-tailed P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The difference of inspection level was set to 5%, the F-test level was set to 10%, and the CI credibility was set as 95%. All statistical analyses were performed with STATA 13.0 (Stata Corp, College Station, Texas, USA) software for Windows.

RESULTS

Forty-eight CRKP strains were isolated from the department of respiratory (15 strains), geriatric (14 strains), cardiovascular surgery, general surgery, blood and marrow transplantation and rheumatism (3 strains for each), hematology (2 strains), infectious disease, nephrology, neurology, orthopedics, and urology (1 strain for each). The specimens were collected from sputum (22 strains), urine (11 strains), blood (7 strains), bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (3 strains), drainage liquid (2 strains), venous catheter (1 strain), and gastric juice (2 strains). The CSKP specimens were collected from departments and sites in one-to-one correspondence with those in CRKP group.

Risk factors associated with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection

We reviewed the medical records of 96 index patients, whose mean age was 65.4 years, with a male-to-female ratio of 2.6:1. In univariable analysis, we have found the association of CRKP infection with Charlson comorbidity index, renal dysfunction, cardiovascular disease, ICU stay at the time of the positive culture, previous antibiotic use, use of β-lactams and β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, use of cephalosporins, carbapenems, fluoroquinolones, and antifungal agents, receipt of mechanical ventilation, indwelling of urethral catheter and gastric tube, hemodialysis, blood products’ use, and Charlson comorbidity index [Table 1].

Table 1
Table 1:
Comparison of clinical characteristics of CSKP and CRKP

In multivariable logistic analysis, exposure to β-lactams and β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, ICU stay, and indwelling of urethral catheter tube were identified as risk factors for acquiring CRKP isolates [Table 2].

Table 2
Table 2:
Multivariate analysis of risk factors for CRKP infections

Risk factors associated with mortality caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae

Among the 48 patients enrolled with CRKP infection, 23 (47.9%) patients died, while 2 (4.2%) patients died in the CSKP infection group. Among the total 25 deaths, most of the infections were concentrated in lower respiratory tract infection (21/25, 84.0%), followed by urinary tract infection (4/25, 16.0%). Mortality of KP infections was the same in concomitant diseases and invasive procedures as shown in the result of univariable analysis, presented in Table 3. The result from multivariable analysis indicated that older age, Charlson comorbidity index, and aminoglycosides use were independent risk factors for mortality. However, carbapenems’ use was not found to be associated with mortality [Table 4].

Table 3
Table 3:
Analysis of risk factors associated with KP infection-induced death
Table 4
Table 4:
Multivariate analysis of risk factors for KP infection-induced death

The minimum inhibitory concentration of antimicrobial in Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates

As shown in Table 5, the antimicrobial susceptibilities between 31 KPC gene-positive CRKP isolates and 17 KPC gene-negative CRKP isolates were compared, and the MIC of the carbapenems, levofloxacin, β-lactams, and β-lactamase inhibitor combinations between the two groups was found to be significantly different. Fourteen of 31 KPC-gene positive isolates were separated from death group patients, with the 17 isolates of the rest from survival group. There was no significant difference for MIC between the death and the survival groups.

Table 5
Table 5:
The comparison of antimicrobial MIC between KPC gene-positive and KPC gene-negative CRKP isolates

DISCUSSION

CRKP is resistant to almost all antimicrobial agents, hence it poses a serious threat to public health.[7] Previously reported outbreaks have been associated with the plasmid-encoded KPC.[8] CRKP isolates harboring KPC gene are susceptible only to polymyxins, tigecycline, and few remaining aminoglycosides.[9] CRKP strains contain various drug resistance genes and they have exhibited relatively high resistance to ethyl alcohol, chlorhexidine acetate, and iodophor.[10] There has been a remarkable increase in CRKP cases reported in China since 2010. ST11 is the major clone in China.[1112] In terms of clinical practice, we believe that more attention should be paid to risk factors associated with CRKP infection and KP-induced death.

In our retrospective analysis, we found that a few independent risk factors were associated with infection and death. The use of any antibiotic within the past 1 month and exposure to β-lactams and β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, cephalosporins, and fluoroquinolones, rather than the carbapenems, were associated with CRKP infections. The result of our study is consistent with those of several earlier studies in which different kinds of antibiotic administration prior to CRKP infection were risk factors.[13141516] It remains a question how exposure to fluoroquinolones predisposes carbapenems’ resistance among CRKP.

One of the other studies suggests that plasmid-encoded quinolone resistance determinant gene causing low-level fluoroquinolone resistance was located on KP plasmids encoding KPC genes.[13] Another study suggests that fluoroquinolones led to upregulation of the multidrug efflux pump MexEF-OprN and reduced levels of OprD porin,[17] with supervenient resistance to both fluoroquinolone and carbapenems.[18] The significance of these findings is not clear, but they have indicated that restricting the inappropriate use of antibacterial agents will decrease the chance of spreading CRKP.

Our study also suggested that ICU stay was associated with CRKP infection, which was consistent with some other studies.[419] The airborne and contact transmission of resistant bacteria in the ICU environment probably led to nosocomial infection on most patients admitted to the ICU,[13] especially for the critically ill patients with prolonged ICU stay who may undergo more invasive procedures and be treated with more broad-spectrum antibiotics. We also found in our study that indwelling of urethral catheter was an independent risk factor associated with CRKP infection, due to its close contact with the mucosal surface. Frequent invasive operations and tube indwelling could cause mucosal barrier injury, which eventually leads to further decline of body resistance and increase in the possibility of CRKP infection. Similarly, the studies conducted by Jiao et al.[13] and Tuon et al.[20] had shown that tracheotomy and mechanical ventilation were the independent risk factors associated with CRKP infection, respectively.

As indicated in our data, the mortality of CRKP infection patients was 47.9%, which was considerably higher than that of control group (4.2%, P < 0.05). The number of CRKP isolates detected from the death group was 23, 92% of all deaths, among them 14 KPC-gene positive isolates accounted for 60.8%. Nonetheless, the number of CRKP isolates detected from the survivals was 25, 35.2% among them, 17 KPC-gene positive isolates accounted for 68%. There was no significant difference between two groups on KPC gene carriage; however, there was a significant difference on the MIC of three kinds of antibiotics which were carbapenems, β-lactams/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, and fluoroquinolone. There was no statistically significant difference of MIC between death group and survival group in KPC-gene positive isolates. It appears that the KPC was irrelevant to the patients with KPC gene-positive CRKP mortality. Some studies suggested that KPC-producing KP gut colonization and infection appears to be an important risk factor for mortality. Further investigation remains to be performed.[2122]

Charlson et al.'s weighted index of comorbidities is a rating system which is based on the underlying diseases.[23] Our data also identified that the median of Charlson comorbidity index of the death was 87, which was higher than the survival's (15). Older age and high Charlson comorbidity index were independent risk factors for mortality of KP-infected patients. Meanwhile, several studies have found higher mortality rates related to patients’ comorbidity.[2425] The other study showed that the only risk factor independently associated with 30-day mortality was an elevated SOFA score on the 1st day of infection.[26] Some of the present clinical studies[2728] focus on using antimicrobials to treat CRKP-infected patients to reduce mortality. Our study showed that more extensive use of aminoglycosides was also an independent risk factor. Whether the toxicity of the aminoglycosides induces the death of the hosts, which needs further research.

Apparently, ages, severe accompanying diseases, and inadequate antibiotic treatment would impair the immunity and increase the risk of infection and even death.

Our study had several limitations: first, the sample size was not large, which might lead to deviation in statistical analysis; second, this study was only conducted in one tertiary care teaching hospital in Beijing, China, the situation may differ in other cities and countries. Multisite study should be performed to have more reliable results.

In conclusion, mortality rate of CRKP infections is high, a high score of Charlson comorbidity index is the representative relevant risk factor in KP infection-caused deaths, which often occur in elderly frail patients with aminoglycoside use. Independent risk factors for CRKP infection were admission to ICU, antimicrobial use, and invasive operation. Therefore, it is of crucial importance to implement infection control measures and protect the immune function of the patients.

Financial support and sponsorship

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant (No. 81201338).

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

We express our sincere appreciation to the hospitals and all listed authors participated in the study.

REFERENCES

1. Arnaud I, Maugat S, Jarlier V, Astagneau P, National Early WarningInvestigation and Surveillance of Healthcare-Associated Infections Network (RAISIN)/multidrug resistance study group. . Ongoing increasing temporal and geographical trends of the incidence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae infections in France, 2009 to 2013 Euro Surveill. 2015;20:36 doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2015.20.30014
2. Mouloudi E, Massa E, Papadopoulos S, Iosifidis E, Roilides I, Theodoridou T, et al Bloodstream infections caused by carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae among Intensive Care Unit patients after orthotopic liver transplantation: Risk factors for infection and impact of resistance on outcomes Transplant Proc. 2014;46:3216–8 doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.09.159
3. Chang EK, Kao KL, Tsai MS, Yang CJ, Huang YT, Liu CY, et al Occult Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia at emergency department: A single center experience J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2015;48:684–91 doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2015.08.010
4. Schwaber MJ, Klarfeld-Lidji S, Navon-Venezia S, Schwartz D, Leavitt A, Carmeli Y, et al Predictors of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae acquisition among hospitalized adults and effect of acquisition on mortality Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:1028–33 doi: 10.1128/AAC.01020-07
5. Kaye KS, Harris AD, Samore M, Carmeli Y. The case-case-control study design: Addressing the limitations of risk factor studies for antimicrobial resistance Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2005;26:346–51 doi: 10.1086/502550
6. Tsai YK, Liou CH, Fung CP, Lin JC, Siu LK. Single or in combination antimicrobial resistance mechanisms of Klebsiella pneumoniae contribute to varied susceptibility to different carbapenems PLoS One. 2013;8:e79640 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079640
7. Saidel-Odes L, Borer A. Limiting and controlling carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Infect Drug Resist. 2013;7:9–14 doi: 10.2147/IDR.S44358
8. Schwaber MJ, Lev B, Israeli A, Solter E, Smollan G, Rubinovitch B, et al Containment of a country-wide outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in Israeli hospitals via a nationally implemented intervention Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52:848–55 doi: 10.1093/cid/cir025
9. Chen LF, Anderson DJ, Paterson DL. Overview of the epidemiology and the threat of Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemases (KPC) resistance Infect Drug Resist. 2012;5:133–41 doi: 10.2147/IDR.S26613
10. Guo W, Shan K, Xu B, Li J. Determining the resistance of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae to common disinfectants and elucidating the underlying resistance mechanisms Pathog Glob Health. 2015;109:184–92 doi: 10.1179/2047773215Y.0000000022
11. Wang LH, Wei DD, Wan LG, Yu Y, Deng Q, Liu Y, et al Diversity of the genetic environment of the blaKPC-2 gene among Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates in a Chinese hospital Microb Drug Resist. 2016;22:15–21 doi: 10.1089/mdr.2014.0281
12. Sun K, Chen X, Li C, Yu Z, Zhou Q, Yan Y, et al Clonal dissemination of multilocus sequence type 11 Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase – Producing K. pneumoniae in a Chinese teaching hospital APMIS. 2015;123:123–7 doi: 10.1111/apm.12313
13. Jiao Y, Qin Y, Liu J, Li Q, Dong Y, Shang Y, et al Risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection/colonization and predictors of mortality: A retrospective study Pathog Glob Health. 2015;109:68–74 doi: 10.1179/2047773215Y.0000000004
14. Gasink LB, Edelstein PH, Lautenbach E, Synnestvedt M, Fishman NO. Risk factors and clinical impact of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009;30:1180–5 doi: 10.1086/648451
15. Lin KY, Lauderdale TL, Wang JT, Chang SC. Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Taiwan: Prevalence, risk factors, and impact on outcome of infections J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2016;49:52–9 doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2014.01.005
16. Candevir Ulu A, Kurtaran B, Inal AS, Kömür S, Kibar F, Yapıcı Çiçekdemir H, et al Risk factors of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection: A serious threat in ICUs Med Sci Monit. 2015;21:219–24 doi: 10.12659/MSM.892516
17. Köhler T, Michea-Hamzehpour M, Epp SF, Pechere JC. Carbapenem activities against Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Respective contributions of OprD and efflux systems Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43:424–7
18. Tanimoto K, Tomita H, Fujimoto S, Okuzumi K, Ike Y. Fluoroquinolone enhances the mutation frequency for meropenem-selected carbapenem resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, but use of the high-potency drug doripenem inhibits mutant formation Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:3795–800 doi: 10.1128/aac.00464-08
19. Gregory CJ, Llata E, Stine N, Gould C, Santiago LM, Vazquez GJ, et al Outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in Puerto Rico associated with a novel carbapenemase variant Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31:476–84 doi: 10.1086/651670
20. Tuon FF, Rocha JL, Toledo P, Arend LN, Dias CH, Leite TM, et al Risk factors for KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia Braz J Infect Dis. 2012;16:416–9 doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2012.08.006
21. Tascini C, Lipsky BA, Iacopi E, Ripoli A, Sbrana F, Coppelli A, et al KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae rectal colonization is a risk factor for mortality in patients with diabetic foot infections Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;21:790.e1–3 doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.04.010
22. Ducomble T, Faucheux S, Helbig U, Kaisers UX, König B, Knaust A, et al Large hospital outbreak of KPC-2-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: Investigating mortality and the impact of screening for KPC-2 with polymerase chain reaction J Hosp Infect. 2015;89:179–85 doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2014.11.012
23. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–83
24. Delle Rose D, Sordillo P, Gini S, Cerva C, Boros S, Rezza G, et al Microbiologic characteristics and predictors of mortality in bloodstream infections in Intensive Care Unit patients: A 1-year, large, prospective surveillance study in 5 Italian hospitals Am J Infect Control. 2015;43:1178–83 doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.06.023
25. Tam VH, Gamez EA, Weston JS, Gerard LN, Larocco MT, Caeiro JP, et al Outcomes of bacteremia due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa with reduced susceptibility to piperacillin-tazobactam: Implications on the appropriateness of the resistance breakpoint Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:862–7 doi: 10.1086/528712
26. Freire MP, Abdala E, Moura ML, de Paula FJ, Spadão F, Caiaffa-Filho HH, et al Risk factors and outcome of infections with Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K.pneumoniae in kidney transplant recipients Infection. 2015;43:315–23 doi: 10.1007/s15010-015-0743-4
27. Demiraslan H, Dinc G, Ahmed SS, Elmali F, Metan G, Alp E, et al Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae sepsis in corticosteroid receipt mice: Tigecycline or colistin monotherapy versus tigecycline/colistin combination J Chemother. 2014;26:276–81 doi: 10.1179/1973947813y.0000000143
28. van Duin D, Cober ED, Richter SS, Perez F, Cline M, Kaye KS, et al Tigecycline therapy for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) bacteriuria leads to tigecycline resistance Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20:O1117–20 doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12714

Edited by: Li-Min Chen

Keywords:

Infection; Klebsiella pneumonia; Logistic Regression; Mortality; Risk Factors

© 2018 Chinese Medical Association