Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

CORRInsights®: Novel Augmentation Technique for Patellar Tendon Repair Improves Strength and Decreases Gap Formation: A Cadaveric Study

Maffulli, Nicola MD, MS, PhD, FRCS (Orth)1,2,a

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®: December 2016 - Volume 474 - Issue 12 - p 2619–2621
doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5065-z
CORR Insights
Free

1Department of Musculoskeletal Surgery, University of Salerno School of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, Salerno, Italy

2Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Hospital, 275, Bancroft Road, E1 4DG, London, UK

ae-mail; n.maffulli@qmul.ac.uk

Received August 23, 2016/Accepted August 26, 2016; previously published online September 8, 2016

This CORR Insights®is a commentary on the article “Novel Augmentation Technique for Patellar Tendon Repair Improves Strength and Decreases Gap Formation: A Cadaveric Study” by Black and colleagues available at: DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-5009-7.

The author certifies that he, or a member of his immediate family, has no funding or commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

The opinions expressed are those of the writers, and do not reflect the opinion or policy of CORR® or The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons®.

This CORR Insights® comment refers to the article available at DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-5009-7.

This comment refers to the article available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-5009-7.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Where Are We Now?

Patellar tendon tears occur most commonly either at the lower pole of the patella or in midsubstance [10]. The injury can be disabling, and surgical repair is performed in patients who are fit for surgery in the hope of restoring the lost extensor function [6]. It is not clear which of these two types of patellar tendon tears carries a better prognosis. Although several studies have described patellar tendon repairs with and without augmentation, we really do not know which approach is better. Biomechanical studies have compared the efficacy of various techniques, but a consensus regarding the preferred repair method could not be reached [2, 5, 7, 11].

Black and colleagues performed an elegant laboratory study using cadaveric samples to produce a lesion of the patellar tendon. The authors compared the simple suture technique to their novel figure-of-eight suture technique. The results are compelling, and confirm the potential advantages of the novel technique versus traditional end-to-end repair.

Early mobilization following repair and reconstruction procedures for the entire musculoskeletal system is well recognized [13]. Musculoskeletal injuries, including patellar tendon tears, require repairs that should be strong enough to withstand the stresses imposed by motion, loading, and, possibly, weight bearing. To this end, there are advocates for the use of bone anchors [8], which can be hard to use well, and which are expensive. The search is on for the ideal repair.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Where Do We Need To Go?

When the patellar tendon ruptures, the tendon is not neatly transected. Even in avulsions from the lower pole of the patella, the tendon is shredded, presenting a horse-tail or mop-head appearance. Torn tendons often show evidence of marked tendinopathic changes, with necrotic and malacic areas. These pathological changes, intrinsic to these lesions, would be difficult or impossible to reproduce in a laboratory study. Therefore, in order to better simulate the actual clinical picture, researchers should consider making several longitudinal tenotomies of the tendon before transecting it.

In the quest for the strongest materials, the use of nonabsorbable sutures remains popular, especially in North America. However, there is evidence [1] that absorbable materials are safer, as they do not act as a permanent foreign body, and are therefore less likely to contribute to infection. Since suitably strong absorbable materials are commercially available, surgeons should consider switching to biologically friendly materials, such as polyglactin, polydioxanone, and polyglyconate.

Back to Top | Article Outline

How Do We Get There?

Orthopaedic surgeons often think that stronger is better. Although the current study shows a statistically favorable increase in mechanical performance, we must determine if that percentage matters in a clinical practice setting. Black and colleagues indicated an increase in mean load to failure of around 15%. However, the force generated by a quadriceps contraction is many times what even the modified technique would be able to withstand [3, 4, 9, 12]. Consequently, patients will still need to be immobilized. The technique advocated by Black and colleagues involves more surgical steps than the control technique, likely prolonging the operation. One has to consider whether prolonging the operation for an improved biomechanical performance, which may not produce any benefits in terms rehabilitation, is worthwhile.

Biomechanical studies of suture strength in cadaver or other models are a good start, but they are only a start. What matters is whether they heal, how they perform when used in our patients, and whether any observed differences are clinically important. To demonstrate this, only adequately powered randomized controlled trials with appropriately chosen outcome measures, and suitably long followup will do.

Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Ahluwalia R, Zourelidis C, Guo S, Dega R. Chronic sinus formation using non absorbable braided suture following open repair of Achilles tendon. Foot Ankle Surg. 2013;19:e7-e9 10.1016/j.fas.2012.11.003.
2. Bushnell BD, Byram IR, Weinhold PS, Creighton RA. The use of suture anchors in repair of the ruptured patellar tendon: A biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:1492-1499 10.1177/0363546506287489.
3. Cometti G, Maffiuletti NA, Pousson M, Chatard JC, Maffulli N. Isokinetic strength and anaerobic power of elite, subelite and amateur French soccer players. Int J Sports Med. 2001;22:45-51 10.1055/s-2001-11331.
4. Erskine RM, Jones DA, Maffulli N, Williams AG, Stewart CE, Degens H. What causes in vivo muscle specific tension to increase following resistance training? Exp Physiol. 2011;96:145-155 10.1113/expphysiol.2010.053975.
5. Ettinger M, Dratzidis A, Hurschler C, Brand S, Calliess T, Krettek C, Jagodzinski M, Petri M. Biomechanical properties of suture anchor repair compared with transosseous sutures in patellar tendon ruptures: a cadaveric study. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41:2540-2544 10.1177/0363546513500633.
6. Khan KM, Cook JL, Maffulli N. Maffulli N, Leadbetter W, Renstrom P. Patellar tendinopathy and patellar tendon rupture. Tendon Injuries 2005;London, EnglandSpringer.
7. Krushinski EM, Parks BG, Hinton RY. Gap formation in transpatellar patellar tendon repair: pretensioning Krackow sutures versus standard repair in a cadaver model. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:171-175 10.1177/0363546509343802.
8. Lee D, Stinner D, Mir H. Quadriceps and patellar tendon ruptures. J Knee Surg. 2013;26:301-308 10.1055/s-0033-1353989.
9. Li RC, Maffulli N, Hsu YC, Chan KM. Isokinetic strength of the quadriceps and hamstrings and functional ability of anterior cruciate deficient knees in recreational athletes. Br J Sports Med. 1996;30:161-164 10.1136/bjsm.30.2.1611332383.
10. Maffulli N, Wong J. Rupture of the Achilles and patellar tendons. Clin Sports Med. 2003;22:761-776 10.1016/S0278-5919(03)00009-7.
11. Ravalin RV, Mazzocca AD, Grady-Benson JC, Nissen CW, Adams DJ. Biomechanical comparison of patellar tendon repairs in a cadaver model: An evaluation of gap formation at the repair site with cyclic loading. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30:469-473.
12. Reeves ND, Maffulli N. A case highlighting the influence of knee joint effusion on muscle inhibition and size. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2008;4:153-158 10.1038/ncprheum0709.
13. Sharma P, Maffulli N. Sivananthan S, Sherry E, Warnke P, Miller MD. Musculoskeletal structure, function and healing. Mercer's Textbook of Orthopaedics and Trauma 2012; 10, London, EnglandHodder Arnold.
© 2016 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins LWW