Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

SECTION I: SYMPOSIUM: Papers Presented at the 2006 Meeting of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society

Cryoablation and Resection Influences Patient Survival for Soft Tissue Sarcomas

Impact on Survivorship and Local Recurrence

Ahlmann, Elke R MD*; Falkinstein, Yuri MD; Fedenko, Alexander N MD; Menendez, Lawrence R MD, FACS

Editor(s): O'Connor, Mary I MD; Ward, William G Sr. MD; Mindell, Eugene R MD

Author Information
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research: June 2007 - Volume 459 - Issue - p 174-181
doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e318059b898
  • Free

Abstract

Soft tissue sarcomas have been treated with various modalities including surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, or a combination of these treatments. Achieving local tumor control while preserving limb function is an important goal of treatment. The use of chemotherapy as a surgical adjuvant has had equivocal results in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas.6,7,18 The combination of surgery and radiation therapy has been generally effective in treating high-grade sarcomas, but results have not been particularly impressive in the treatment of low-grade tumors.2

Toxicity and serious complications are often associated with the use of these adjuvant modalities leading to poor functional outcomes. Radiation therapy for soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities causes substantial morbidity, including epidermolysis, fibrosis, stiffness, delayed wound healing, wound infection, radionecrosis of bone, degenerative arthritis, peripheral neuropathy, and the later development of radiation-induced sarcoma.21,23,35,45 The morbidity of systemic chemotherapy in the treatment of cancer is well-recognized, and the efficacy of this modality in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas is controversial.6,7,18 Additionally, these adjuvants are often contraindicated in certain patients, including the elderly, those with multiple medical conditions, those who have previously been treated with the maximum allowable dose of radiation, and those with tumors unresponsive to these modalities. In the past, such patients had no option other than to undergo surgical resection without prior treatment of their tumors. Although wide resection alone should theoretically remove all tumor, neoadjuvant therapy has the benefit of sterilizing the adjacent soft tissues, shrinking the tumor, and destroying microscopic satellite lesions that may be left behind, thereby facilitating resection. Along these lines, cryoablation may be an appropriate adjunct to make limb salvage safer by decreasing the amount of histologically viable tumor.

Cryoablation is a recognized approach to the treatment of various malignancies including those of the liver,38,39 prostate,3,17,19 head and neck,43 eye,10,22 and skin.24,44 The range of application of cryosurgical techniques to the treatment of cancer is widely diversified and steadily increasing in scope. This technique was first shown to be effective in devitalizing tissue in the 1850s when iced saline solutions were used to treat breast and uterine carcinomas.12 In 1907, liquid nitrogen was used to freeze skin carcinomas, and in the 1950s a multitude of carcinomas were treated with this method.13 The concept of a cryoprobe was first introduced in 1963 for use in neurosurgical procedures.14

Cryosurgery is most useful in easily accessible areas of the body, but recent advances in technology have made it possible to treat tumors in areas previously thought relatively inaccessible. Cryoprobes can provide a controllable and predictable area of necrosis and their use is the preferred method of treatment in many situations.11,13,14,30,36,41 Dramatic advances in imaging technology, especially the development of computer-enhanced real-time intraoperative ultrasonography have allowed for the safe and precise monitoring of deep-seated lesions that before could not be visualized adequately. Cryosurgical ablation has been extensively used in the treatment of various neoplasms of bone.2,20,25-29,42 There are no published data suggesting cryosensitivity of certain cell types, and so we could assume any tumor can be devitalized with adequate freezing. To date, however, soft tissue sarcomas have not been treated extensively with this modality, although these tumors are present in relatively accessible locations.

We wanted to determine whether cryoablation followed by tumor resection for the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas produces histologic necrosis comparable to that of other neoadjuvant treatments and whether it influences patient survival, local recurrence, and functional outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively searched our orthopaedic oncology database and identified 133 patients with soft tissue sarcomas treated from August 1997 to April 2003. We included patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of nonmetastatic soft tissue sarcoma, no prior treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy prior to surgical resection, and the use of cryoablation as an intraoperative adjuvant. Patients who were treated with neoadjuvant radiation and/or chemotherapy in addition to cryoablation were excluded from this study because the amount of resulting necrosis could not be attributed to the cryosurgical procedure alone. Thirty-eight patients met the criteria. We reviewed their charts for information pertaining to demographics, location of the lesion, radiographic evaluation, surgical management, histology, complications, and functional outcome. A power analysis indicated 652 patients would be required to demonstrate a statistically significant increase in recurrence-free survival and overall survival as a result of cryoablation. The study included 20 male and 18 female patients with an average age of 59 years (range, 28-92 years). The minimum followup was 6 months (average, 37 months; range, 6-98 months). All living patients had a minimum of 24 months of followup. Patients who died of disease before reaching 24 months of followup were also included in the study.

Locations of the tumors were the thigh (13), leg (4), forearm (3), chest wall (3), buttocks (3), pelvis (3), shoulder (1), arm (1), and hand (1). We used the surgical staging system adopted by the American Joint Committee on Cancer9 to classify the tumors: Stage IA (4), Stage IB (4), Stage IIA (2), Stage IIB (19), and Stage IIIB (9). Diagnoses included malignant fibrous histiocytoma (16), myxoid liposarcoma (6), extraskeletal chondrosarcoma (5), leiomyosarcoma (3), synovial cell sarcoma (3), malignant Schwannoma (2), epithelioid sarcoma (1), and fibrosarcoma (1).

All patients had been referred to the senior author (LRM) for treatment. At presentation, a workup including detailed history and physical examination, plain radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computerized tomography (CT) scan of the chest were obtained according to a standard protocol. After appropriate staging, all patients underwent incisional biopsy to confirm the diagnosis of a soft tissue sarcoma.

We performed surgical resection through a longitudinal incision made over the sarcoma. Appropriate skin flaps or fascial cutaneous flaps were raised and a cuff of normal tissue was left around the lesion. Neurovascular structures not in direct continuity with the pseudocapsule of the tumor were mobilized and retracted. After taking care to adequately protect the surrounding soft tissues, neurovascular structures, and skin, cryosurgical ablation commenced. Ultrasonography of the lesion was performed using 5-MHz or 7.5-MHz intraoperative transducers (3535 Ultrasound Scanning System, B-K Medical Systems, Wilmington, MA) to assist with strategic placement of the cryoprobes. Probes 3 mm, 8 mm, or 10 mm in diameter were inserted sequentially into the lesion at the discretion of the surgeon, depending on which cryosystem was used. The initial five cases were performed using the Cryotech LCS 3000® system (Candela Laser Corporation, Wayland, MA), and the ensuing seven cases were performed with the CMS AccuProbe® 450 cryosurgical system (Cryomedical Sciences, Inc, Rockville, MD). Both systems circulate gaseous nitrogen through the cryoprobes to effect freezing of tissue. Since 2001 we have been using the CRYOcare® system (Endocare Inc, Irvine, CA), which uses argon gas and therefore has the advantage of freezing faster and colder than liquid nitrogen to achieve temperatures of up to −186°C. For all cryoablative procedures, the probes were placed to ensure a complete freeze of the tumor as well as a minimum 10-mm cuff of normal tissue. Intralesional temperatures of −160°C were maintained for 15 minutes with constant monitoring using thermocouples (Fig 1). The freeze cycle was also monitored with ultrasonography by visualizing the freezing interface as an advancing hyperechoic hemispheric rim with complete acoustic shadowing (Fig 2). The ice ball was extended 10 mm beyond the tumor margin into normal tissue in an attempt to freeze satellite lesions that may have been present in the reactive zone of the tumor. Once the ice ball reached the appropriate size, the tumor was allowed to slowly thaw by circulating helium gas through the probes and maintaining a temperature of 0°C for 5 minutes. The cycle was then repeated for a total of two cycles of fast-freeze/slow-thaw. Warm distilled water was then used to aid with thawing of the ice ball that encompassed the tumor, as well as to enhance the tumoricidal effect. At the end of the second thawing cycle, the probes were removed and the holes left by the cryoprobes were packed with Gelfoam® (Upjohn Co, Kalamazoo, MI). Wide resection of the tumor was then performed often necessitating the use of osteotomes to resect the frozen tissue. The cryoablation was considered successful if an ice ball encompassing the entirety of the tumor and a wide margin was visualized and successfully performed on all 38 patients. Overall, the entire cryoablative process added approximately 60 minutes to the procedure. No procedure required intraoperative termination due to technical reasons or complications. The wound was closed in the usual manner and a suction drain inserted.

F1-29
Fig 1:
Seven 8-mm cryoprobes inserted into the sarcoma around the ellipsed biopsy tract are seen at the center of the image. Two smaller 1.2-mm temperature transducers inserted at the periphery of the lesion monitor temperature at the margins of the ice ball. The surrounding skin is retracted and protected with use of laparotomy pads to prevent necrosis as a result of freezing.
F2-29
Fig 2:
An ultrasound image of two cryoprobes labeled proximal and distal to a sarcoma of the thigh is shown. Between the cryoprobes, the advancing ice ball can be visualized as a hyperechoic mass.

All patients received postoperative antibiotics until the drain was removed, and they were discharged from the hospital when medically stable. Patients were monitored for complications related to their surgery.

Gross specimens were assessed and measured for tumor dimensions at the time of resection. The average tumor volume was 848 cm3 (range, 12-6800 cm3). Tissues were processed according to previously described methods37,40 with the goal of obtaining representative samples from all areas of the specimen in order to find viable residual tumor. Each tumor was initially inked and cut along the long axis resulting in slab sections of opposing hemispheres. The slab sections were cut both parallel and perpendicular into small cubes from end-to-end and the location of the segments labeled in order to map the specimen. Histologic analysis was performed from each mapped segment as well as from random samples to obtain representative sections from all areas of the tumor. An average of 30 histologic sections from each tumor was made. Permanent histologic specimens were reexamined retrospectively by two pathologists (ANF, AC) specializing in musculoskeletal neoplasms, who agreed with the reported findings. Microscopically, tumors were classified as either low- or high-grade on the basis of established criteria, including the degree of nuclear pleomorphism, degree of differentiation, and number of mitoses per high-power field. Multiple morphologic parameters were reviewed, including the presence or absence of tumor, anatomic distribution of residual tumor when present, qualitative and quantitative analysis of viable tumor when present, and a review of resection margin status. A clear margin was defined as a minimum of 10 mm between the surgical margin and evidence of tumor. Quantitative analysis was generated by reviewing and gathering data in a slide-by-slide fashion, totaling and then averaging the values for extent of necrosis as well as residual tumor. Extent of necrosis was determined relative to the percentage of residual viable tumor.

Patients were followed postoperatively at regular intervals every 3 months for the first 2 years, every 6 months between 2 years and 5 years after treatment and yearly thereafter. Each followup included physical examination, MRI of the extremity, CT scan of the chest, and specific questions about symptoms and complications. Functional evaluation was performed by administering the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) survey for the functional outcome of surgical management of musculoskeletal tumors8 at the latest followup. This survey equally weights pain, function, emotional acceptance, ambulatory supports, walking ability, and gait to obtain an overall numeric rating, as well as a subjective rating of patient satisfaction.

Statistical analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method to generate survivorship curves with corresponding 95% confidence intervals for overall patient survival and disease-free survival using the GraphPad Prism® software (GraphPad Software, Inc, San Diego, CA). Time zero was defined as the date of surgical resection. The endpoint of evaluation for disease-free survival was defined as the time to development of either local recurrence or metastatic disease. For overall survival the end-point was confirmed tumor-related mortality. All other deaths unrelated to the neoplasm were censored. The log-rank test and Cox proportional-hazards regression model were used to analyze the association between percent necrosis and recurrence or overall survival. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Histologic evaluation of permanent specimens revealed 16 of the 38 patients (42%) had evidence of near-complete (≥95%) tumor necrosis, and 11 of these (29%) had complete (100%) histologic necrosis (Fig 3). However, the majority of specimens revealed less than 95% necrosis. In 58% of cases, cryoablation was not effective in achieving complete devitalization of tumor tissue. The percent necrosis for these 22 cases was 90% (3), 80% (4), 70% (1), 50% (4), 40% (3), 30% (1), 20% (2), 10% (2), and 5% (2). In all cases the viable tissue seen in the resected tumor was only at the periphery or rim, indicating that there was inadequate freezing and the ice ball did not encompass the entire tumor. Six of these patients had relatively large tumors with a volume greater than 1000 cm3 (mean, 1894 cm3). In these cases only a 1- to 2-cm rim of viable tumor remained at the periphery. All tumors were resected with a clear margin of 10 mm between the surgical margin and evidence of tumor. With the numbers available, we found no difference in percent tumor necrosis for those tumors less than 1000 cm3 and more than 1000 cm3, indicating there should be no contraindication to treating large tumors with cryoablative techniques. We observed no bias toward a certain grade of tumor demonstrating either an entirely favorable or unfavorable amount of tumor necrosis (Table 1).

T1-29
TABLE 1:
Pathologic Necrosis Based on American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Grade
F3-29
Fig 3A:
B. (A) A histologic biopsy specimen of patient with malignant fibrous histiocytoma before treatment shows malignant histiocyte-like cells growing in a storiform pattern with nuclear pleomorphism and cellular atypia. (B) A postresection specimen of the same patient exhibits an excellent response to treatment with more than 95% histologic necrosis after cryoablation (Stain, hematoxylin & eosin; original magnification, ×100).

We detected no difference in the recurrence rate in those patients with complete freezing of the tumor indicated by evidence of more than 95% necrosis from the rate in patients with less than 95% necrosis. The recurrence-free survival was 87% at both 2 and 5 years for patients with more than 95% necrosis, and 87% and 72% respectively for those with less than 95% necrosis based on Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis (Fig 4). Local tumor recurrence occurred in three patients with an average time from surgical resection to the development of local recurrence of 16 months (range, 5-37 months). All tumors were malignant fibrous histiocytomas and all demonstrated less than 95% necrosis. Tumor necrosis for these patients was an average of 50% (range, 10-50%) and average tumor volume was 3132 cm3 (range, 956.3-6300 cm3). All patients were treated with reexcision and adjuvant cryoablation and are currently without evidence of disease.

F4-29
Fig 4:
Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves with 95% confidence intervals show no difference in recurrence-free survivorship based on percent necrosis.

Overall patient survival was less (p = 0.006) in patients who had tumors that were not adequately frozen: those patients who had less than 95% necrosis had poorer survival at 2 and 5 years that those with greater than 95% necrosis (Fig 5).

F5-29
Fig 5:
Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves with 95% confidence intervals show that patients with adequate freezing indicated by more than 95% histologic necrosis have a greater (p = 0.006) overall patient survival than those patients who had less than optimal tumor freezing. The 2-year and 5-year survivorships are 94% and 86% respectively for patients with more than 95% necrosis. For patients with less than 95% necrosis, survival is 53% at 2 years and 34% at 5 years.

We observed a decrease (p = 0.021) in disease-free survival in those patients with less than complete freezing of their tumors. Disease-free survival for patients with more than 95% necrosis was 85% at 2 and 5 years respectively. For patients with less than 95% necrosis, disease-free survival decreased to 60% at 2 years and 50% at 5 years (Fig 6).

F6-29
Fig 6:
Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves with 95% confidence intervals show that patients with adequate freezing indicated by more than 95% histologic necrosis have a greater (p = 0.021) disease-free survival than those patients who had less than optimal tumor freezing. Patients with more than 95% necrosis had disease-free survival of 85% at 2 and 5 years respectively. Patients with less than 95% necrosis had 60% and 50% 2 and 5 year disease-free survival respectively.

The most common complication associated with the procedure was the development of serous wound drainage and seroma occurring in 8 patients (21%). This complication is seen frequently with cryoablative procedures due to both the resulting liquefaction of residual frozen tissue as well as the large volumetric defect created as a result of resection. The average tumor volume resected in the patients who developed seromas was 1369 cm3 (range, 16.5-6800 cm3). None of the patients with serous drainage or seromas became infected. The wound drainage subsided within 6 weeks (range, 2-6 weeks). In six patients, seromas resolved after aspiration performed between 1 and 4 weeks postoperatively. Two patients with large seromas that recurred after aspiration required surgical evacuation. No patients in this study required soft tissue coverage with muscle flaps.

Peripheral nerve palsies occurred in five patients (13%) who all had their respective nerves deliberately frozen as we believed mobilizing the nerves from their respective locations in close proximity to the tumor would potentially contaminate the surgical margin. There were three palsies of the sciatic nerve and one of the posterior tibial nerve, which occurred after resection of tumors of the posterior compartment of the thigh. The remaining patient developed palsies of both the radial and ulnar nerves after resection of a tumor from the arm. All five cases initially had complete motor and sensory neuropraxias but demonstrated complete recovery of function, two within 1 week of cryoablation, two within 3 months, and the remaining patient within 6 months.

Superficial wound infections that resolved after a course of oral antibiotics occurred in three patients. No cases of deep wound infection, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or skin slough occurred in this study.

For the patients surviving at the time of this study, the average MSTS functional outcome score was 26 (range, 22-30) indicating patients achieved good to excellent postoperative function corresponding to 87% of baseline function. The patients who scored lowest were those who had experienced nerve palsies and therefore had prolonged recovery time. All patients in this study were able to return to activities of daily living and occupation-related activities.

DISCUSSION

Cryosurgery is a method of treating neoplastic tissue in situ to achieve devitalization prior to resection.13,14 It is now a recognized approach to the treatment of malignant tumors and the range in application of this technique is widely diversified and steadily increasing in scope. Malignancies in various parts of the body, including bone,2,20,25,28 have been treated with cryosurgical techniques. Experience in treatment of soft tissue sarcomas with this modality has been limited.31

As with most studies evaluating the effectiveness of a treatment regimen for soft tissue sarcomas, the present study is limited by small patient numbers and limited followup. These are rare tumors and acquiring adequate numbers of patients is difficult. However, this study may be useful for evaluating the effectiveness of an alternative treatment for a group of patients who otherwise have few options for adjunctive therapies. Although soft tissue sarcomas often take a substantial amount of time to recur or metastasize, previous studies have reported most patients who develop local recurrence will do so within 2 years of surgery.6,7,18,23,45 For this reason we limited the study to those living patients with a minimum 2-year followup resulting in a relatively small group of patients. However, we also included those patients who died of disease before they reached 2 years of followup in order not to eliminate those patients who died early in the course of treatment.

The achievement of local control is essential in the successful treatment of soft tissue sarcomas.21,23,45 Although wide resection alone should theoretically remove all tumor, neoadjuvant therapy has the benefit of sterilizing the adjacent soft tissues and destroying microscopic satellite lesions that may be left behind, thereby facilitating resection. Cryoablation may be an appropriate adjunct to make limb salvage safer for patients who cannot undergo chemotherapy or radiation by decreasing the amount of histologically viable tumor present during resection. In addition, extending the zone of cryoablation past the grossly apparent tumor may provide for a safer and greater margin by destroying microscopic satellite lesions that would otherwise have been left behind as viable tumor and ultimately lead to recurrence. In theory, this should decrease the local recurrence rate and may ultimately improve overall survival.

Successful cryoablation requires that the same volume of tissue must be frozen as would have been excised if the tumor was treated with conventional wide resection alone. The amount of tissue devitalized cryosurgically must extend past the reactive zone of a tumor and into surrounding normal tissue so that all satellite lesions are destroyed.13,14,31 In this study, percent of tumor necrosis was used as a indicator of extent and adequacy of the tumor freezing process. Cryoablation was effective in producing more than 95% tumor necrosis in 42% of patients. The necrosis seen in these specimens was virtually complete and easily identifiable by histology. In the treatment of osteogenic sarcoma, necrosis of greater than 95% has been shown to correlate with a complete response to chemotherapy as well as improved prognosis.1,46 For this reason we used 95% as the cut-off amount in the current study to avoid interpreting spontaneous necrosis of the tumor as a response to cryoablation.

The difference in overall survival and disease-free survival we found based on amount of histologic necrosis emphasizes the importance of complete freezing of the tumor. The fact that only 42% of tumors had either complete or near complete necrosis highlights the technical difficulty of the cryoablation procedure. Of the patients with less than 95% necrosis five were treated with the Cryotech® LCS 3000 and seven with the CMS Accu-Probe® 450 system. Both commercially available models of probes were designed for treatment of liver, prostate, and uterine tumors and can only accommodate a maximum of five probes simultaneously. When freezing large bulky tumors five probes are sometimes inadequate. In such cases, the tumor must be frozen in sections, which may not be ideal. The CRYOcare® system we presently use can accommodate up to eight probes simultaneously and thus a greater volume of tumor can be frozen at one time. In this study all cases without favorable histologic responses to cryoablation can be explained by inadequate freezing. The resected tissue specimens showed pockets of viable tumor or interspersed viable cells throughout the tumor margins. The cells at the center of the tumor that were adequately frozen became necrotic as expected, while at the periphery some viable cells remained due to the tumors not being completely frozen at their margins. Of the 14 patients with less than 50% necrosis, eight of these cases were performed early in our experience with this technique. The lack of complete necrosis can be attributed to several factors, including poor intraoperative imaging and the initial lack of use of thermocouples to monitor temperature. Early in our experience the propagating ice ball often could not be well visualized. We have not encountered this problem with the current use of more technologically advanced ultrasound transducers and have been able to more easily assess propagation of the ice ball to encompass the entirety of the tumor. Another problem we initially encountered was the inability to accurately assess the temperature of the tumor in all dimensions during propagation of the ice ball. We have since used thermocouples to monitor the temperature at the periphery of the ice ball and have been able to assure an adequate margin of devitalized tissue at the periphery of the tumor. We recommend the placement of multiple thermocouples at the expected margin of later resection to assure a temperature of at least −40°C for more than 1 minute.

The effects of freezing are nonselective; normal and malignant tissues are destroyed equally. An exception to this is the muscular wall of large arteries, which are relatively impervious to the effects of freezing.4,5,15,16 Large vessels will show no evidence of thrombosis or wall damage after thawing.4,16 For this reason, a tourniquet should not be used when performing a cryosurgical ablation of an extremity sarcoma. No patients in this study developed clinical evidence of thrombosis or vascular damage. The close proximity of major vessels to a sarcoma should therefore not be a contraindication to performing cryoablation. Care should still be taken to protect and retract vascular structures as far as possible from the tumor bed to prevent unnecessary freezing.

Peripheral nerves are another exception to the nonselective effects of freezing. Peripheral nerve palsies were documented after cryosurgical treatment of bone tumors.28,29 Peripheral nerves that are frozen develop a neuropraxia and cease to function initially, but this resolves anywhere between 3 and 12 months after the initial insult.28,29,32,33 Peripheral nerve palsies associated with cryosurgery appear transient, and there have been no reported cases of permanent nerve dysfunction.28,29,32,33 Therapeutic cryosurgical ablation of intercostal nerve freezing has often been used to prevent postthoracotomy pain, and this surgically induced neuropraxia was also transient.34 In the present study, all cases of transient neuropraxia completely resolved between 1 week and 6 months postoperatively.

We have previously demonstrated cryoablation is a safe and technically feasible treatment for soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity.31 Cryosurgical ablation should not be used in lieu of conventional treatment techniques, but may be an effective surgical adjuvant for certain patients. We currently limit our use of cryoablation in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas to those patients who cannot or chose not to undergo other adjuvant treatments. Further randomized, controlled investigations of this technique are necessary to determine the effect on long-term patient survivorship. Our data highlight the importance of achieving complete freezing of the tumor and the technical challenges associated with the cryoablation process.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Dr. Adrian Correa for his assistance with this study.

References

1. Bacci G, Mercuri M, Longhi A, Ferrari S, Bertoni F, Versari M, Picci P. Grade of chemotherapy-induced necrosis as a predictor of local and systemic control in 881 patients with non-metastatic osteosarcoma of the extremities treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in a single institution. Eur J Cancer. 2005;41:2079-2085.
2. Bickels J, Meller I, Schmookler BM, Malawer MM. The role and biology of cryosurgery in the treatment of bone tumors: a review. Acta Orthop Scand. 1999;70:308-315.
3. Bonney WW, Fallon B, Gerber WL. Cryosurgery in prostatic cancer: elimination of local lesion. Urology. 1982;22:8-15.
4. Bowers WD Jr, Hubbard RW, Daum RC, Ashbaugh P, Nilson E. Ultrastructural studies on muscle cells and vascular endothelium immediately after freeze-thaw injury. Cryobiology. 1973;10:9-21.
5. Cooper IS, Samma K, Wisniewska K. Effects of freezing in major arteries. Stroke. 1971;2:471-482.
6. Cormier JN, Huang X, Xing Y, Thall PF, Wang X, Benjamin RS, Pollock RE, Antonescu CR, Maki RG, Brennan MF, Pisters PW. Cohort analysis of patients with localized, high-risk, extremity soft tissue sarcoma treated at two cancer centers: chemotherapy-associated outcomes. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:4567-4574.
7. Eilber FC, Eilber FR, Eckardt J, Rosen G, Riedel E, Maki RG, Brennan MF, Singer S. The impact of chemotherapy on the survival of patients with high-grade primary extremity liposarcoma. Ann Surg. 2004;240:686-695.
8. Enneking WF, Dunham W, Gebhardt MC, Malawar MM, Pritchard DJ. A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;286:241-246.
9. Fleming ID, Cooper JS, Henson DE. American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1997.
10. Fraunfelder FT, Boozman FW, Wilson RS, Thomas AH. No-touch technique for intraocular malignant melanomas. Arch Ophthalmol. 1977;95:1616-1620.
11. Gage A. What temperature is lethal for cells. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1979;5:459-461.
12. Gage AA. Probe cryosurgery. In: Epstein E, Epstein E Jr, eds. Skin Surgery. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1987:465-479.
13. Gage AA. Cryosurgery in the treatment of cancer. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992;174:73-92.
14. Gage AA, Torre D. Cryosurgery. In: Webster J. Encyclopedia of Medical Devices and Instrumentation. New York, NY: Wiley and Sons, Inc; 1988:893-908.
15. Gage AM, Montes M, Gage AA. Freezing the canine thoracic aorta in situ. J Surg Res. 1979;27:331-340.
16. Giampapa VC, Oh C, Aufses AH. The vascular effect of cold injury. Cryobiology. 1981;18:49-54.
17. Gonder MJ, Soanes WA, Shulman S. Cryosurgical treatment of the prostate. Invest Urol. 1966;3:372-378.
18. Grobmyer SR, Maki RG, Demetri GD, Mazumdar M, Riedel E, Brennan MF, Singer S. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for primary high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcoma. Ann Oncol. 2004;15:1667-1672.
19. Gursel E, Roberts M, Veenema R. Regression of prostatic cancer following sequential cryotherapy to the prostate. J Urol. 1972;108:928-932.
20. Jacobs PA, Clemency RE Jr. The closed cryosurgical treatment of giant cell tumor. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;192:149-158.
21. Kuklo TR, Temple HT, Owens BD, Juliano J, Islinger RB, Andejeski Y, Frassica DA, Berrey BH. Preoperative versus postoperative radiation therapy for soft tissue sarcomas. Am J Orthop. 2005;34:75-80.
22. Lazar M, Geyer O, Rosen N, Godel V. A transconjunctival cryosurgical approach for intraorbital tumors. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1985;13:417-420.
23. Livi L, Santoni R, Paiar F, Bastiani P, Beltrami G, Caldora P, Capanna R, DeBiase P, Detti B, Fondelli S, Meldolesi E, Pertici M, Polli C, Simontacchi G, Biti G. Late treatment-related complications in 214 patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma treated by surgery and postoperative radiation therapy. Am J Surg. 2006;191:230-234.
24. Lubritz RR. Cryosurgery management of multiple skin carcinomas. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1977;3:414-416.
25. Malawer MM, Bickels J, Meller I, Buch R, Kollender Y. Cryosurgery in the treatment of giant cell tumor: a long-term follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;359:176-188.
26. Malawer MM, Dunham W. Cryosurgery and acrylic cementation as surgical adjuncts in the treatment of aggressive (benign) bone tumors: analysis of 25 patients below the age of 21. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;262:42-57.
27. Marcove RC, Stovell PB, Huvos AG, Bullough PG. The use of cryosurgery in the treatment of low and medium chondrosarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1977;122:147-156.
28. Marcove RC, Lyden JP, Huvos AG, Bullough PG. Giant cell tumors treated with cryosurgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973;55:1633-1644.
29. Marcove RC, Weis LD, Vaghaiwalla MR, Pearson R. Cryosurgery in the treatment of giant cell tumors of bone: a report of 52 consecutive cases. Cancer. 1978;41:957-969.
30. Mazur P. Physical and chemical factors underlying cell injury in cryosurgical freezing. In: Rand RW, Rinfret AP, Von Leder H, eds. Cryosurgery. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas; 1968:32-51.
31. Menendez LR, Tan MS, Kiyabu MT, Chawla SP. Cryosurgical ablation of soft tissue sarcomas: a phase I trial of feasibility and safety. Cancer. 1999;86:50-57.
32. Miles TS, Hribar D. Recovery of function after cryosurgical lesions of peripheral nerves in rats. Neurosci Lett. 1981;24:285-288.
33. Myers RR, Powell HC, Hechman HM, Costello ML, Katz J. Biophysical and pathological effects of cryogenic nerve lesion. Ann Neurol. 1981;10:478-485.
34. Nelson KM, Vincent RG, Bourke RS, Smith DE, Blakely WR, Kaplan RJ, Pollay M. Intraoperative intercostals nerve freezing to prevent post-thoracotomy pain. Ann Thorac Surg. 1974;18:280-285.
35. Paulino AC. Late effects of radiotherapy for pediatric extremity sarcomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;60:265-274.
36. Pestana C, Reitmeier RJ, Moertel GG, Judd ES, Dockerty MB. The natural history of carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Am J Surg. 1964;108:826-829.
37. Picci P, Bacci G, Campanacci M. Histologic evaluation of necrosis in osteosarcoma induced by chemotherapy: regional mapping of viable and nonviable tumor. Cancer. 1985;56:1515-1521.
38. Ravikumar TS, Kane R, Cady B, Jenkins R, Close M, Steel G Jr. A 5-year study of cryosurgery in the treatment of liver tumors. Arch Surg. 1991;126:1520-1524.
39. Ravikumar TS, Steel G Jr, Kane R, King V. Experimental and clinical observations on hepatic cryosurgery for colorectal metastases. Cancer Res. 1991;51:6323-6327.
40. Raymond AK, Ayala AG. Specimen management after osteosarcoma chemotherapy. In: Unni KK, ed. Bone Tumors. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1988:157-181.
41. Reite OB. Mechanical forces as a cause of cellular damage by freezing and thawing. Biol Bull. 1966;131:197-203.
42. Schreuder HW, Pruszczynski M, Veth RP, Lemmens JA. Treatment of benign and low-grade malignant intramedullary chondroid tumors with curettage and cryosurgery. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1998;24:120-126.
43. Weaver AW, Smith DB. Cryosurgery for head and neck cancer. Am J Surg. 1974;128:466-470.
44. Zacarian SA, Adham M. Cryotherapy of cutaneous malignancy. Cryobiology. 1966;2:212-218.
45. Zagars GK, Ballo MT, Pisters PW, Pollock RE, Patel SR, Benjamin RS. Preoperative vs. postoperative radiation therapy for soft tissue sarcoma: a retrospective comparative evaluation of disease outcome. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;56:482-488.
46. Zunino JH, Johnston JO. Prognostic value of histologic tumor necrosis assessment in osteogenic sarcoma of bone. Am J Orthop. 2000;29:369-372.
© 2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.