It generally is accepted that polyethylene wear particles induce a macrophage response, which leads to osteolysis and aseptic loosening in total joint arthroplasties. 23,24,29 In the 1990s, wear of polyethylene components and osteolysis after total knee arthroplasties were reported with increased frequency. 11,17,32,34,36 Generation of polyethylene wear particles is one of the most important factors that affects mid-term and long-term results of total knee arthroplasties. 39
The geometry of the articulating surface in total knee arthroplasties affects the characteristics of polyethylene wear particles. 14 Therefore, many designs for total knee arthroplasty prostheses recently have been introduced based on new concepts in wear reduction. 6,18,20,42 Although newly introduced total knee prostheses theoretically provide low wear, no clinical information is available concerning the characteristics of polyethylene wear particles in such knee prostheses. It particularly is important to examine in vivo polyethylene wear generation in such new total knee prostheses before they are used widely.
The aims of the current study were to examine the size, shape, and number of polyethylene particles in synovial fluid at an early stage, and to compare a newly introduced total knee prosthesis such as medial pivot total knee prosthesis with an established posterior-stabilized total knee prosthesis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Synovial fluid was obtained 1 year after surgery from 17 patients who had a total knee arthroplasty (22 knees) under complete sterile conditions. Informed consent was obtained from all patients and the ethical committee in the authors’ hospital authorized to use of this procedure.
Eleven knees had a posterior-stabilized total knee prosthesis (five I-BII, Zimmer, Warsaw, IN; six Osteonics Scorpio PS, Stryker Osteonics Howmedica, Rutherford, NJ), and 11 had a medial pivot total knee prosthesis (Advance Medial-Pivot Knee, Wright Medical Technology, Arlington, TN). The manufacturing methods for polyethylene inserts were a compression molded sheet for the I-BII (GUR4050) prosthesis, and ram extrusion for the Scorpio PS (GUR1050) and the Advance Medial-Pivot Knee (GUR4050) prostheses. Sterilization of the polyethylene insert was done with 2.5 Mrad γ-rays in nitrogen gas for the I-BII and the Scorpio PS prostheses, and ethylene oxide gas for the Advance Medial-Pivot Knee prosthesis. The mean patient age at the time of surgery was 65 years (range, 55–73 years) (posterior-stabilized prostheses, 63.8 ± 2.1 [mean ± standard error] years; medial pivot prostheses, 67.0 ± 2.3 years). The difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.323). Nine patients were men and six patients were women. The preoperative diagnosis of all patients was osteoarthritis. The patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively using the Hospital for Special Surgery knee score 20 and Knee Society score. 19 Preoperative and postoperative activity level was evaluated using the University of California Los Angeles activity-level rating. 1 Quantitative assessment of walking activity was calculated as steps per day. Steps per day was estimated from a University of California Los Angeles activity score and the linear regression line described by Zahiri et al. 44 The knee scores and activity level of each design were investigated by two physicians with experience in total knee arthroplasty (AK, 11 posterior-stabilized prostheses; KI, 11 medial pivot prostheses).
Polyethylene wear particles were isolated using a previously described technique. 7,21,25,26 All solutions were filtered through a 0.2-μm pore nylon filter (150–0020, Nalge Company, Rochester, NY) to avoid contamination of extraneous particles. Synovial fluid was in each case digested with the same amount of 10 mol/L sodium hydroxide at 65° C for 12 hours, applied to sucrose density gradients (5%, 10%, 20%) in a 14-mL tube (14PA tube, Hitachi Koki Co, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan), and then ultracentrifuged at 28,000 rpm (103,700 G) at 4° C for 3 hours (CP100α, P28S1014 rotor, Hitachi Koki Co, Ltd). The top layer was collected and applied to isopropanol-water density gradients (0.90, 0.96 g/mL) in a 40-mL tube (40PA tube, Hitachi Koki Co, Ltd) and ultracentrifuged again at 28,000 rpm (103,200 G) for 1 hour (CP100α, P28S1004 rotor, Hitachi Koki Co, Ltd). Polyethylene particles were collected from the interface between two layers and filtered through 0.1-μm polycarbonate filters (VCTP 013–00, Millipore Corporation, Bedford, MA). The filter was dried, attached to an aluminum specimen mount (M4, Nisshin EM Co, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan), and coated with platinum (E-1030 ion sputter, Hitachi Science Systems Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) for scanning electron microscopic examination (S-4700SI, Hitachi Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) (Fig 1 ). The images were analyzed with a computerized image analyzer (Mac Scope, Minami Co, Tokyo, Japan).
Fig 1A–B.:
Scanning electron microscopy photographs show polyethylene wear particles (A) in a posterior-stabilized total knee prosthesis and (B) in a medial pivot total knee prosthesis (Magnification, ×5000).
The retrieval ratio of this extraction method was determined using normal synovial fluid and commercially-available high-density polyethylene powder (mean particle size, 3.5 μm) (S-395, Shamrock, Petaluma, CA).
It practically is impossible to aspirate completely all synovial fluid in a joint with one puncture. Therefore, the synovial fluid collection ratio was calculated to estimate polyethylene wear particles in the residual synovial fluid in joint capsules. After simple aspiration, 20 mL of saline was injected into the joint capsule and then reaspirated with residual synovial fluid. Polyethylene wear particles in simple aspirated fluid and reaspirated fluid from seven knees were analyzed. The fluid collection ratio was defined as:EQUATION
where A is the total count of polyethylene wear particles in synovial fluid with simple aspiration, and B is that with reaspiration.
The total number and concentration of polyethylene wear particles in the synovial fluid were calculated from (1) the number of particles on the filter; (2) the retrieval ratio; (3) the synovial fluid collection rate; (4) the amount of synovial fluid used for the extraction process; and (5) total amount of synovial fluid. Particle size was expressed using equivalent circle diameter, which is the diameter of a circle having the same area as the particle. Particle shape was determined by the aspect ratio (length/breadth) and roundness (perimeter2 /4π × area). 26
Statistical analyses of differences between the types of prostheses were done using the nonpaired t test and Mann-Whitney U test with a statistical software package (StatView 4.5, Abacus Concepts Inc, Berkeley, CA).
RESULTS
The knee scores and activity levels are shown in Table 1 . The differences in postoperative Hospital for Special Surgery knee score (p = 0.0001) and postoperative Knee Society score (knee score, p = 0.0004; function score, p = 0.005) between the two designs were statistically significant. However, the differences in postoperative University of California Los Angeles score (p = 0.470) and postoperative steps per day (p = 0.400) between two groups were not significant.
TABLE 1: Scores and Activities in Patients with Posterior-Stabilized and Medial Pivot Total Knee Prostheses
The retrieval ratio of polyethylene particles was 65.2%. The synovial fluid collection ratio was 92.3%.
The volume of synovial fluid was 11.0 ± 2.3 mL (mean ± standard error) for posterior-stabilized total knee prostheses and 4.7 ± 1.7 mL for medial pivot total knee prostheses (p = 0.040). The concentration of particles was 1.23 ± 0.62 × 107 /mL for posterior-stabilized total knee prostheses and 4.52 ± 2.41 × 106 /mL for medial pivot total knee prostheses. The total particle number contained in synovial fluid was 1.16 ± 0.57 × 108 for posterior-stabilized total knee prostheses and 9.01 ± 2.95 × 106 for medial pivot total knee prostheses (Table 2 ). The common logarithm of total particle number generated in medial pivot total knee prostheses was smaller than in posterior-stabilized total knee prostheses, and the difference between groups was statistically significant (p = 0.004) (Fig 2A ). The difference in the common logarithm of particle concentration between groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.155) (Fig 2B ).
TABLE 2: Concentration and Number of Polyethylene Wear Particles in Posterior-Stabilized and Medial Pivot Total Knee Prostheses
Fig 2A–B.:
(A) Comparison shows the polyethylene wear particle number (total count per knee) between posterior-stabilized prostheses and the medial pivot total knee prostheses. A common logarithm was used for statistical analysis. (B) Comparison shows the polyethylene particle concentration between posterior-stabilized prostheses and the medial pivot total knee prostheses. A common logarithm was used for statistical analysis.
The size and shape of the particles in each group are shown in Table 3 . Particle size expressed using equivalent circle diameter was 0.78 ± 0.08 μm in posterior-stabilized total knee prostheses and 0.67 ± 0.06 μm in medial pivot total knee prostheses (p = 0.260). Particle shape determined by the aspect ratio was 2.30 ± 0.22 in posterior-stabilized total knee prostheses and 1.90 ± 0.16 in medial pivot total knee prostheses (p = 0.158). Particle shape determined by the roundness was 2.52 ± 0.36 in posterior-stabilized total knee prostheses and 1.80 ± 0.17 in medial pivot total knee prostheses (p = 0.075). Medial pivot prostheses tended to generate smaller and rounder particles. However, the difference was not significant. Particle size distributions expressed by equivalent circle diameter of each group are shown in Figure 3 . For posteriorstabilized and medial pivot total knee prostheses, 0.4 to 0.6 μm was the range with greatest frequency.
TABLE 3: Size and Shape of Polyethylene Wear Particles in Posterior-Stabilized and Medial Pivot Total Knee Prostheses
Fig 3.:
Size distribution shows wear particles in posterior-stabilized prostheses and medial pivot total knee prostheses.
DISCUSSION
There have been only four reports concerning polyethylene particles in synovial fluid of failed total knee prostheses. 5,12,35,43 Although polyethylene wear particles from failed knee prostheses yield important information, wear particles in such failed knee prostheses are generated in extreme conditions and might be affected by unstable interface and third bodies. In the current study, polyethylene wear particles in synovial fluid of total knee prostheses that were functioning well were investigated.
Polyethylene wear particles are generated at the articulation and dispersed into synovial fluid. Some particles then are captured in the capsule and other particles migrate in interface tissue, causing osteolysis and aseptic loosening. Although the number of polyethylene particles in synovial fluid is not necessarily the same as the number of particles generated in countersurface, the number of particles in synovial fluid is related to particles generation and particle deposition in interface tissue. Therefore, generation of large numbers of polyethylene particles may result in great numbers of particles in the joint fluid, the capsule, and the interface tissue, leading to osteolysis. Comparison of polyethylene wear particles in synovial fluid between newly introduced total knee prostheses, and established-design total knee prostheses for which long-term clinical results are available may have some consequence in the incidence of osteolysis.
As reported by Stern and Insall, 38 posterior-stabilized prostheses first were introduced in 1978. The tibial post and femoral cam provide a functional substitution for the posterior cruciate ligament. Posterior-stabilized prostheses have feature problems such as dislocation, 10 cam wear, 30 and patella clunk syndrome. 4,16,27,41 However, it has been reported that polyethylene wear is lower than in other types of prostheses 15 and survivorship is approximately 95% at 15 years. 9 Posterior-stabilized total knee prostheses, therefore, have been recognized as among the few to achieve excellent long-term clinical results. 38
Medial pivot prostheses have been developed based on a unique concept. A large medial ball and socket joint provide a large contact area 33 and low stress. Less congruent lateral articulation reproduces pivotlike movement, 8 as in normal knees. 13,22,31,40 Although a medial pivot prosthesis theoretically reduces wear, there have been no reports concerning long-term clinical results.
In the current study, wear particles tended to be smaller and rounder in medial pivot total knee prostheses than in posterior-stabilized total knee prostheses. However, this difference was not statistically significant. The common logarithm of the total particle number in synovial fluid in medial pivot total knee prostheses was smaller than in posterior-stabilized total knee prostheses, and the difference was statistically significant. The concentration of polyethylene wear particles tended to be smaller in medial pivot total knee prostheses than in posterior-stabilized total knee prostheses, but the difference between groups was not statistically significant. The synovial fluid was a buffer system for polyethylene wear particles. Therefore, the total particle number may correlate with the amount of particles generated at the articulation, whereas the concentration highly depends on the volume of the synovial fluid. These differences may not affect the short-term and midterm results, but would have impact on the long-term stability, which is required in modern designs for total knee arthroplasty prostheses.
The differences in the postoperative Hospital for Special Surgery knee score (p = 0.0001) and the postoperative Knee Society score (knee score, p = 0.0004; function score, p = 0.005) between the two groups were statistically significant. The knee scores and activity levels of patients with each design were investigated separately by two physicians with experience in total knee arthroplasty. Variance between investigators could have affected the differences in the Hospital for Special Surgery knee score and the Knee Society score between the two designs. However, the rating system for the University of California Los Angeles activity score is much simpler and variance between investigators can be minimized using the University of California Los Angeles activity score. Outcome evaluations of joint reconstructions in lower extremities should include an assessment of patient activity. In vivo wear assessments of total joint prostheses should be based on a measure of use. The modern electronic, digital pedometer can be a satisfactory means of quantifying the use of joints in the lower extremities. 37,44 The University of California Los Angeles activity score had a strong correlation with the average steps per day as recorded by modern pedometers in 100 patients with total joint replacements. 44 The University of California Los Angeles activity score is valid for activity assessment in a clinical setting. 44 The differences in the postoperative University of California Los Angeles activity score (p = 0.470) and steps per day as postoperative quantitative activity (p = 0.400) between two designs were not statistically significant. Therefore, the difference in total number of particles between two designs might not be influenced by the difference in patient activity level.
In the early stage, the medial pivot prosthesis generated less wear particles than the posterior-stabilized prosthesis. However, careful followup of patients with the medial pivot total knee prosthesis is mandatory, because polyethylene wear and osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty are multifactorial. 2,3,28 The current authors think that extraction analyses of particles in the early postoperative period generated in well-functioning prostheses provide particularly important information of newly introduced total knee prostheses.
References
1. Amstutz HC, Thomas BJ, Jinnah R, et al: Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip: A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 66A:228–241, 1984.
2. Ayers DC: Maximizing ultra high molecular weight polyethylene performance in total knee replacement. Instr Course Lect 50:421–429, 2001.
3. Bartel DL, Bicknell VL, Wright TM: The effect of conformity, thickness, and material on stresses in ultra-high molecular weight components for total joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 68A:1041–1051, 1986.
4. Beight JL, Yao B, Hozack WJ, Hearn SL, Booth Jr RE: The patellar “clunk” syndrome after posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 299:139–142, 1994.
5. Bosco J, Benjamin J, Wallace D: Quantitative and qualitative analysis of polyethylene wear particles in synovial fluid of patients with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 309:11–19, 1994.
6. Callaghan JJ, Insall JN, Greenwald AS, et al: Mobile-bearing knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 82A:1020–1041, 2000.
7. Campbell P, Ma S, Schmalzried T, Amstutz HC: Tissue digestion for wear debris particle isolation. J Biomed Mater Res 28:523–526, 1994.
8. DesJardins J, Carroll M, LaBerge M: The measurement of TKA kinematics pivot locations during simulated functional activity. Trans Orthop Res Soc 27:960, 2002.
9. Font-Rodriguez DE, Scuderi GR, Insall JN: Survivalship of cemented total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 345:79–86, 1997.
10. Galinat BJ, Vernace JV, Booth Jr RE, Rothman RH: Dislocation of the posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: A report of two cases. J Arthroplasty 3:363–367, 1988.
11. Gross TP, Lennox DW: Osteolytic cyst like area associated with polyethylene and metallic debris after total knee replacement with a vitallium prosthesis: A case report. J Bone Joint Surg 74A:1096–1101, 1992.
12. Hahn DW, Wolfarth DL, Parks NL: Characterization of synovial-fluid samples of revised knee replacements using a light-scattering technique. J Biomed Mater Res 31:355–363, 1996.
13. Hill PF, Vedi V, Williams A, et al: Tibiofemoral movement 2: The loaded and unloaded living knee studied by MRI. J Bone Joint Surg 82B:1196–1198, 2000.
14. Hirakawa K, Bauer TW, Stulberg BN, Wilde AH: Comparison and quantitation of wear debris of failed total hip and total knee arthroplasty. J Biomed Mater Res 31:257–263, 1996.
15. Hirakawa K, Bauer TW, Stulberg BN, Wilde AH, Borden LS: Characterization of debris adjacent to failed knee implants of 3 different designs. Clin Orthop 331:151–158, 1996.
16. Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Booth Jr RE, Balderston RA: The patellar clunk syndrome: A complication of posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 241:203–208, 1989.
17. Hung CH, Yang CY, Cheng CK: Failure of the femoral component associated with polyethylene wear and osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 14:375–379, 1999.
18. Insall JN, Aglietti P, Baldini A, Easley E: Meniscal-Bearing Knee Replacement. In Insall JN, Scott WN (eds). Surgery of the Knee. Vol 2. Ed 3. Philadelphia, Churchill Livingstone 1717–1738, 2001.
19. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN: Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 248:13–14, 1989.
20. Insall JN, Ranawat CS, Aglietti P, Shine J: A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg 58A:754–765, 1976.
21. Iwaki H, Kobayashi A, Kadoya Y, et al: The quantitative characterization of UHMUP, metal and PMMA bone cement particles from the same cases in cemented hip arthroplasty. Trans Orthop Res Soc 25:580, 2000.
22. Iwaki H, Pinskerova V, Freeman MAR: Tibiofemoral movement 1: The shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee. J Bone Joint Surg 82B:1189–1195, 2000.
23. Kadoya Y, Revell PA, Al-Saffar N, et al: Bone formation and bone resorption in failed total joint arthroplasties: Histomorphometric analysis with histochemical and immunohistochemical technique. J Orthop Res 14:473–482, 1996.
24. Kadoya Y, Revell PA, Kobayashi A, et al: Wear particulate species and bone loss in failed total joint arthroplasties. Clin Orthop 340:118–129, 1997.
25. Kobayashi A, Bonefield W, Kadoya Y, et al: The size and shape of particular polyethylene wear debris in total joint replacements. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 211:11–15, 1997.
26. Kobayashi A, Freeman MAR, Bonefield W, et al: Number of polyethylene particles and osteolysis in total joint replacements. J Bone Joint Surg 79B:844–848, 1997.
27. Larson CM, Lachiewicz PF: Patellofemoral complications with the Insall-Burstein II posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 14:288–292, 1999.
28. Maloney WJ, Schurman DJ: The effects of implant design on range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: Total condylar versus posterior stabilized total condylar designs. Clin Orthop 278:147–152, 1992.
29. Maloney WJ, Smith RL, Schmalzried TP, et al: Isolation and characterization of wear particles generated in patients who have had failure of a hip arthroplasty without cement. J Bone Joint Surg 77A:1301–1310, 1995.
30. Mikulak S, Mahoney OM, de la Rosa MA, Schmalzried TP: Loosening and osteolysis with the press-fit condylar posterior-cruciate-substituting total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 83A:398–403, 2001.
31. Nakagawa S, Kadoya Y, Todo S, et al: Tibiofemoral movement 3: Full flexion in the living knee studied by MRI. J Bone Joint Surg 82B:1199–1120, 2000.
32. Nolan JF, Bucknill TM: Aggressive granulomatosis from polyethylene failure in an uncemented knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 74B:23–24, 1992.
33. Pastak PD, Heim CS, Greenwald AS: Tibial plateau surface stress in total knee arthroplasty: A factor influencing polymer damage: Series VI. Trans Orthop Res Soc 22:147, 1998.
34. Peter Jr PC, Engh GA, Dwyer LA, Vinh TN: Osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty without cement. J Bone Joint Surg 74A:864–876, 1992.
35. Peterson C, Benjamin JB, Szivek JA, et al: Polyethylene particle morphology in synovial fluid of failed knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 359:167–175, 1999.
36. Robinson EJ, Mulliken BD, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Alvarez C: Catastrophic osteolysis in total knee replacement: A report of 17 cases. Clin Orthop 321:98–105, 1995.
37. Schmalzried TP, Szuszczewicz ES, Northfield MR, et al: Quantitative assessment of walking activity after total hip or knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 80A:54–59, 1998.
38. Stern SH, Insall JN: Total Knee Arthroplasty with Posterior Cruciate Ligament Substitution Designs. In Insall JN, Scott WN (eds). Surgery of the Knee. Vol 2. Ed 3. Philadelphia, Churchill Livingstone 1660–1694, 2001.
39. Szivek JA, Anderson PL, Benjamin JB: Average and peak contact stress distribution evaluation of total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 11:952–963, 1996.
40. Todo S, Kadoya Y, Moilanen T, et al: Anteroposterior and rotational movement of femur during knee flexion. Clin Orthop 362:162–170, 1999.
41. Vernace JV, Rothman RH, Booth Jr RE, Balderston RA: Arthroscopic management of the patellar clunk syndrome following posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 4:179–182, 1989.
42. Walker PS: Design Criteria for Total Knee Replacement. In Insall JN, Scott WN (eds). Surgery of the Knee. Vol 1. Ed 3. Philadelphia, Churchill Livingstone 284–314, 2001.
43. Wolfarth DL, Hahn DW, Bushear G, Parks NL: Separation and characterization of polyethylene wear debris from synovial fluid and tissue samples of revised knee replacements. J Biomed Mater Res 34:57–61, 1997.
44. Zahiri CA, Schmalzried TP, Szuszczewicz ES, Amstutz HC: Assessing activity in joint replacement patients. J Arthroplasty 13:890–895, 1998.
Section Description
William J. Maloney, MD; and John C. Clohisy, MD—Guest Editors