Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Original Articles

Contribution of COMT and BDNF Genotype and Expression to the Risk of Transition From Acute to Chronic Low Back Pain

Baumbauer, Kyle M. PhD*,†,‡,§; Ramesh, Divya PhD*; Perry, Mallory PhD, RN*; Carney, Katherine B. PhD, RN; Julian, Thomas RN*; Glidden, Nicole BS; Dorsey, Susan G. RN, FAAN, PhD#; Starkweather, Angela R. RN, ANCP-BC, CNRN, FAAN, PhD*,‡; Young, Erin E. PhD*,‡,¶,**

Author Information
The Clinical Journal of Pain: June 2020 - Volume 36 - Issue 6 - p 430-439
doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000819
  • Open

Abstract

Low back pain (LBP) is responsible for one-third of work-related disability claims, is one of the top 10 most expensive conditions in the United States, and affects nearly 1 in 10 people worldwide.1,2 For most individuals with an acute low back pain (ALBP) episode, the pain resolves within 4 to 6 weeks and patients regain the ability to resume normal activities (acute resolving LBP; ALBP). However, an estimated 20% of individuals with acute pain will continue to have pain beyond 12 weeks (chronic low back pain; CLBP) at a level that negatively impacts normal activities, function, and quality of life.3 The transition to CLBP raises the risk of long-term disability and comorbidities including other pain disorders.4

In ~ 90% of individuals who seek health care for LBP there is no identifiable etiology and the pain is presumed to be of mechanical or nonspecific origin.5 Even though the origin of the pain is unclear, as the prevalence of CLBP increases there has been a concomitant increase in health care utilization including spinal injections, surgical procedures, and use of opioid medications.6 Early identification and intervention for those individuals with the highest risk for CLBP may provide a more effective method for prevention and management. Prior studies have identified a number of factors that contribute to a profile of risk for CLBP, including psychological health, poorer general health, functional impairment, increased inflammatory tone, and heritable factors,7–9 but there remains a lack of consensus regarding key variables in predicting those that will eventually transition to a chronic pain state. This paucity in the literature prevents the development of precision health care strategies directed at the mechanisms of risk.

As with many complex health conditions, LBP likely represents a disorder of complex etiology comprised of multigenic contributions as well as environmental factors. Heritability of LBP is estimated to range from 30% to 60% with higher familial incidence associated with increased severity of LBP.10,11 A number of studies have focused on genetic contributions to physical degeneration of the vertebral discs or to development of nerve injury-pain following sciatic compression due to herniation of a disc.12,13 Degenerative disc disease (DDD) is often cited as a cause of LBP although disc degeneration is ubiquitous among adults and characterized by increased desiccation of the spinal disc matrix, proteoglycan degradation, and elevated disc tissue levels of proinflammatory cytokines.14 Given that the degree of DDD does not correlate well with pain severity or duration, surgical options are typically reserved only after conservative measures have failed to improve function and quality of life. More recent work by Pinheiro et al9 confirmed a relationship between CLBP and anxiety/depression with further support for a shared heritable mechanism, though a list of proposed candidate genes in this shared mechanism were not identified. For the present study, we identified 2 high priority candidate genes, Catechol-O-Methyltransferase (COMT) and Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF), based on prior work by ourselves and others suggesting that these 2 genes (1) encode products that are potent mediators of pain processing,15–21 (2) play an important role in the early steps of nervous system sensitization leading to enhanced pain sensitivity,22–25 and (3) may contribute to the etiology of depression and/or anxiety leading to exacerbation of pain.26,27COMT encodes the catechol-o-methyltransferase enzyme responsible for catecholamine metabolism and thus modulation of adrenergic, noradrenergic, and dopaminergic signaling. COMT is one of the most frequently studied “pain genes” and has been associated with differential pain sensitivity under normal and pathologic conditions.28–33 Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) and haplotypes within COMT have been shown to alter both the structure and function of the resulting COMT enzyme and, subsequently, modulate levels of the neurotransmitters that are degraded downstream.28,29,34–39

Given the number and nature of the neurotransmitters metabolized by COMT, it is, perhaps, not surprising that it has been found to play a role in pain sensitivity/susceptibility as well as mood and other psychological outcomes.40,41 When considered as part of the biopsychosocial model of pain, COMT genotype is associated with psychological outcomes including anxiety and depression but also interacts with other psychological traits like pain catastrophizing to determine pain outcomes in other clinical populations.42 This complexity is illustrated by the mixed conclusions in the literature regarding the role of COMT in clinical and experimental pain outcomes. BDNF encodes the protein brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a regulator of synaptic transmission and plasticity at adult synapses and in response to injury, and a number of polymorphisms have been shown to affect the availability and activity of BDNF.13,14

Cortical pain processing is associated with large-scale changes in neuronal connectivity, resulting from neural plasticity phenomena of which BDNF is a central driver. Noxious stimulation also increases BDNF production in the spinal dorsal horn43–45 and in the brainstem45,46 leading to increased pain signaling and manifestations of enhanced pain sensitivity such as hyperalgesia and allodynia.47

On the basis of previous findings, our hypothesis was that the CLBP group would have higher pain burden early on, increased sensitivity to painful stimulation, and increased frequency of BDNF and COMT risk alleles compared with the ALBP group. The primary aim of the study was to (1) compare somatosensory function and pain ratings at LBP onset between the patients in the ALBP condition and those in the CLBP condition and (2) evaluate the potential contribution of BDNF and COMT polymorphisms and gene expression levels at LBP onset to higher pain burden during ALBP and risk for developing CLBP.

METHODS

Participants

Men and women between the ages of 18 to 50 years of age with recent onset of LBP (<2 weeks at time of recruitment) and able to read and write in English were invited to participate from primary health care clinics, college campuses, and the general community through advertisements. This age range was selected to provide a more homogenous sample in terms of general health, work status, and contributing factors of CLBP. An acute nonspecific LBP episode was defined as pain anywhere in the region of the low back bound superiorly by the thoraco-lumbar junction and inferiorly by the lumbo-sacral junction, which had been present for >24 hours but <4 weeks duration and was preceded by at least 1 pain-free month.48 Recruitment took place at 2 urban university health systems after approval from the Institution Review Board. All participants provided written consent before study participation.

Volunteers with LBP were excluded for the following: (1) pain at another site or associated with a painful condition (eg, DDD, herniated lumbar disc, fibromyalgia, neuropathy, rheumatoid arthritis, sciatica); (2) previous spinal surgery; (3) presence of neurological deficits; (4) history of comorbidities that affect sensorimotor function (eg, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury); (5) pregnant or within 3 months postpartum; (6) taking opioid, or anticonvulsant medication; and, (7) history of diagnosed psychological disorders (bipolar disorder, schizophrenia).

After collection of data at the baseline visit, participants who continued to have pain ≥2 on the numeric rating scale were followed up every 6 weeks until either the patient reported that their pain had resolved in the time since their previous visit or until 24 weeks (end of the study). Participants whose pain had resolved as indicated by a visual analogue scale (VAS) rating of 1 or below by the 6-week time-point were classified as ALBP. Participants who had chronic pain at the 6-month visit were classified as CLBP.

Procedures

After obtaining informed consent, participants were scheduled to undergo baseline data collection as soon as possible but no longer than 1 week from the time of consent. Data collection took place in a private research suite to complete questions about age, sex, socioeconomic status, educational attainment, lifestyle behaviors (smoking, exercise), comorbidities, and past episodes of LBP. Following completion of the questionnaires, participants underwent venipuncture for collection of blood samples and quantitative sensory testing (QST). The sequence of data collection was followed for all participants.

Pain Measures

The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) is a pain assessment tool that has well-established reliability and validity for adult patients with LBP, and is sensitive to change over time.49 The BPI assesses the severity of pain, location of pain, pain medications, amount of pain relief in the past 24 hours and the past week, and the impact of pain on daily functions.

The McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) short form is a reliable self-report measure of pain perception.50,51 It entails 15 verbal descriptors of sensory and affective dimensions of pain and is scored on a 4-point scale (0-none to 3-severe) by adding the numeric value of each pain dimension. Higher scores indicate higher levels of sensory and affective components of pain (range, 0 to 45).

QST

QST was used to evaluate responses to experimental pain and uses standardized stimuli to test both nociceptive and non-nociceptive systems.52 Quantitative sensory testing was performed on the lumbar region and the dominant forearm (remote area). A standardized protocol of administration, including examination room conditions and instructions provided for the participant, were strictly followed from the same protocol described in the preliminary analysis reported by our group.53,54 Participants completed a confirmation trial on the nondominant forearm to verify the participant’s understanding of the procedures.

Genotyping

Genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted from buffy coat using standard protocols (DNA mini kit, Qiagen). All samples were genotyped for 3 COMT SNPs (rs4633, rs4818, rs4680) and 1 BDNF SNP (rs6265) using predesigned TaqMan primers and universal genotyping master mix (Life Technologies, Thermo Fisher) (Table 1). The global minor allele frequencies for all SNPs were ≥0.20 based on data from 1000 Genomes. Genotyping assays were performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol using an Applied Biosystems (ABI) StepOne Plus PCR machine and ABI allelic discrimination software.

TABLE 1
TABLE 1:
Details on Candidate SNPs Assessed in Low Back Pain Participants

Gene Expression Analysis

Whole blood was collected by venipuncture into one 5-mL EDTA vacutainer and one 10-mL Paxgene blood RNA tubes (PreAnalytix, Qiagen), labeled with a unique study identification label, and transported directly to the laboratory for processing. RNA isolation was performed using the PAXgene total RNA isolation system (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and was reverse transcribed using RT2 cDNA kit (Qiagen). The mRNA expression of 84 genes involved in the transduction, maintenance, and modulation of pain was determined (Neuropathic & Inflammatory RT2 Profiler PCR Array; Sabio Sciences, Valencia, CA) using qPCR performed on the ABI StepOne Plus PCR machine. After an initial incubation step, 40 cycles (95°C for 15 seconds and 1 minute at 60°C) of PCR were performed. Relative gene expression levels were quantified for COMT and BDNF using the 2-∆∆CT method which normalizes data of the genes of interest to the average of 3 housekeeping genes β-actin (ACTB), GAPDH, and Beta-microtubulin (B2M) and determines the expression level relative to normal controls.

Statistical Analyses

The results from the current sample are part of larger funded NIH study (NCT01981382, clinicaltrails.gov). We have already examined differences in demographic variables as well relationship between genetic variation of the FAAH gene and pain sensitivity in this population.55 Student t tests were used to test for group differences in QST variables that were normally distributed, χ2 was used to identify differences in genotype frequency between ALBP and CLBP conditions and multiple stepwise linear regression analyses using an additive genetic model to explore the contributions of the candidate gene SNPs to each outcome measure as a separate dependent variable. In the first step, we entered biological predictors influential to health outcomes (age, sex, race, and ethnicity). The subsequent step(s) of the model consisted of individual SNP genotype and/or candidate gene expression values. In order to correct for multiple comparisons (total of 4 for the 4 individual SNPs evaluated), the adjusted P-value necessary for significant associations is P≤0.0125. Given the sample size and our desire not to dismiss potential clinically relevant associations, we present findings and their associated P-values. We have used the uncorrected P-value ≤0.05 throughout the manuscript to identify statistical significance. This approach allows for the most robust generation of testable hypotheses for future studies into the mechanisms underlying any associations.

RESULTS

Demographics and Genetic Variation

A total of 220 participants were recruited; the final sample for analysis was comprised of first 42 participants that had resolution of their pain within 6 weeks from onset and the first 42 participants who continued to have pain for 6 months (termination of the study). The remaining participants resolved at some point after 6 weeks and before 6 months and were not included in the present analysis. These participants were successfully genotyped at 4 SNPs (rs6265 [BDNF] and rs4680, rs4633, and rs4818 [COMT]). We previously reported a preliminary analysis of baseline demographic, psychological, and self-report pain scores among ALBP and CLBP participants and relationship between FAAH genotype.55 As shown in Table 2, we observed some heterogeneity in age, sex, race, and ethnicity within our sample and between the 2 groups (ALBP and CLBP). As a result, we loaded these factors as the first step in the stepwise regression to remove potential confounding effects and identify significant effects based on the proportion of the variance (R2 change, F change, P change) explained by genotype and/or gene expression.

TABLE 2
TABLE 2:
Pain Self-report at the Time of Low Back Pain Onset by Group

Comparing Pain at the Time of Onset for ALBP Versus CLBP Participants

A pattern of increased pain burden was found for the participants that would go on to develop CLBP compared with the ALBP participants across multiple measures and outcomes assessed at the time of recruitment. Mean comparisons using independent samples t tests revealed that CLBP participants reported significantly higher ratings for the pain severity and pain interference subscales of the BPI (Worst Pain, Least Pain, Average Pain, Pain Now and Pain Interference; all P<0.001) (Fig. 1). Participants also completed the MPQ at the time of recruitment and, for those that would go on to develop CLBP, at their 6-month follow-up. Analysis with independent samples t test revealed that CLBP participants reported higher sensory (P<0.05) and present pain intensity (PPI) scores (P<0.001) on the MPQ at the time of recruitment (Fig. 2). Analysis of somatosensory function (QST) assessments conducted on the lower back at the time of initial recruitment revealed lower average cold pain threshold (CPT; P=0.010), lower mechanical pain threshold (MPT; P=0.021), and greater dynamic mechanical allodynia (DMA; P=0.018) in the CLBP group compared with the ALBP group (Fig. 3A, B, and D). Pressure pain thresholds (PPT) did not differ between the acute and chronic groups when stimulation occurred on the back (Fig. 3C). When remote somatosensory function was assessed by stimulating the nondominant forearm, only CPT (P=0.012) and PPT (P=0.041) differed between CLBP and ALBP groups with CLBP participants exhibiting CPT to higher temperatures and PPT to lower force stimulation (for summary of all QST at both locations included in this analysis, see Table 3). No other significant differences were found in QST measures (ie, heat pain threshold and windup ratio).

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1:
Pain burden is higher early on for those who will go on to develop chronic low back pain (CLBP) compared with those with acute resolving LBP. Within 2 weeks of LBP onset, those that will develop CLBP score higher on all subscales of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) assessed, all P<0.001. *Statistical significance.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2:
McGill Pain Questionnaire Present Pain Intensity (VAS) Ratings are higher early on for those who will develop chronic low back pain (CLBP) compared with those with acute resolving LBP. CLBP participants reported higher present pain intensity at the time of recruitment (P<0.001). *Statistical significance. VAS indicates visual analogue scale.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3:
Somatosensory function is altered in those who will develop chronic low back pain (CLBP) compared with those with acute resolving LBP. When testing was conducted on the lower back (the painful area), cold pain threshold (CPT, P=0.010; A), mechanical pain threshold (C, P=0.021), and dynamic mechanical allodynia to brush stroke (D, P=0.018) was exacerbated in those that would go on to develop CLBP while pressure pain threshold (PPT, P>0.05; B) did not differ between groups. When testing was conducted on a remote location on the nondominant forearm only CPT (A, P=0.012) and PPT (B, P=0.041) were significantly different between CLBP and acute resolving LBP groups. *Statistical significance.
TABLE 3
TABLE 3:
Quantitative Sensory Testing Time of Low Back Pain Onset Between Groups

Those with CLBP exhibited significant stability in their responses to painful stimulation (ie, QST) as well as in their pain self-report (BPI and MPQ). Paired samples t tests for all BPI subscales indicated that only pain interference (BPI-Int) changed from the time of recruitment to 6 months postrecruitment (t39=2.637, P<0.05), with a reduction in BPI-Int at 6 months suggesting that while reported pain intensity remained unchanged the patients’ perceived interference with daily function decreased over time, potentially reflecting effective coping in the face of chronic pain. All other self-report measures, BPI-Worst, BPI-Least, BPI-Average, and MPQ, were stable and showed no significant change between the time points (all P<0.05). Moreover, paired samples t tests showed no significant change in QST measures of MPT, CPT, PPT, MST, or DMA (all P>0.05) indicating significant stability in QST over time for those who would go on to develop CLBP with no change detected from recruitment to study completion at 6 months. These analyses are in agreement with prior reports that more severe acute pain increases risk for development of chronic pain states.56,57

Candidate Gene Polymorphisms are Associated With Susceptibility to CLBP

COMT Genotype and CLBP Susceptibility

χ2 test was performed to determine whether the genotypic frequencies differed between acute and chronic pain conditions, that is, those that would resolve quickly and those that would go on to develop CLBP. The genotypic frequencies of COMT SNP rs4680 differed significantly between the groups (AR and CLBP) (χ2(2, N=79)=10.223, P=0.006) (Fig. 4A) with more participants homozygous for the major allele at rs4680, corresponding to a valine substitution at codon 158, known to result in the more functionally active form of the resulting COMT enzyme, in the CLBP group compared with the ALBP group. Two additional COMT SNPs, rs4633 and rs4818, showed no significant differences in frequency for ALBP and CLBP conditions (data not shown). In agreement with the χ2 analysis presented above, multiple stepwise linear regression revealed a significant association between rs4680 genotype and pain condition whereby genotype predicted ∼5% of the variance in group ALBP vs. CLBP (Fchange=4.233, r2change=0.046, Pchange=0.043). Moreover, when COMT expression was subsequently added as the next step of the regression model, it was revealed that COMT expression was associated with transition to CLBP (Fchange=5.670, r2change=0.057, Pchange=0.020) and predicted an additional ∼6% of the variance.

FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4:
COMT and BDNF SNP genotypes are significantly associated with likelihood of transition to chronic low back pain (CLBP). A, The genotypic frequencies of COMT SNP rs4680 differed significantly between the groups (ALBP and CLBP) (P=0.006) with more participants homozygous for the major allele (Met/Met) found in the CLBP group. B, Fewer subjects in the CLBP group were found to be homozygous for the minor allele at rs6265 BDNF (P=0.009). SNP indicates single nucleotide polymorphism.

BDNF Genotype, Expression, and CLBP Susceptibility

As described above, χ2 test was performed to determine whether the frequency for the 3 genotypes differed between the 2 pain conditions. The distribution of BDNF SNP rs6265 genotype differed significantly between the groups (χ2(2, N=79)=9.60, P=0.009) (Fig. 4B) with a smaller proportion of patients in the CLBP group homozygous for the minor allele at rs6265, corresponding to a methionine substitution at amino acid position 66, compared with ALBP participants. Multiple stepwise linear regression revealed an association between BDNF SNP rs6265 genotype and susceptibility to CLBP that approached significance (Fchange=3.908, r2change=0.042, Pchange=0.052) but, when BDNF expression was added to the model, we found no additional significant association between BDNF expression and susceptibility to CLBP above and beyond the relationship with BDNF genotype.

Associations of COMT Genotype and Expression With Acute LBP Pain Burden (BPI and MPQ)

When baseline BPIInt was considered for all patients combined (AR and CLBP), multiple linear regression revealed that COMT SNP rs4680 genotype, but not COMT expression, was significantly associated with BPIInt (Fchange=7.944, r2change=0.092, Pchange=0.006) and predicted ∼9% of the variance. No other significant COMT SNP associations were detected for BPIInt or any other severity subscales of the BPI at the time of recruitment. While the sample size was not adequate to separately examine potential genetic associations with BPIInt at 6 months, BPIInt scores at the time of recruitment and at 6 months were highly positively correlated (rP=0.618, P<0.001). Both COMT SNP rs4680 genotype (Fchange=6.979, r2change=0.085, Pchange=0.010) and BDNF SNP rs6265 genotype (Fchange=4.259, r2change=0.050, Pchange=0.043), but not COMT or BDNF expression, were significantly associated with VAS ratings of PPI on the MPQ, explaining ∼9% and ∼5% of the variance in PPI at the time of recruitment, respectively. MPQ VAS ratings of PPI at the time of initial recruitment and the 6-month follow-up were significantly positively correlated (rP=0.445, P<0.01).

COMT and BDNF Genotype are Associated With Cold Hypersensitivity But Not Mechanical Pain Sensitivity at LBP Onset

Group differences in QST outcomes between the ALBP and CLBP conditions have been reported elsewhere,55,58 however, the potential associations between COMT and BDNF SNP genotype and QST outcomes have not been evaluated. Multiple linear regression analysis on CPT revealed significant associations for both COMT SNP rs4680 genotype (Fchange=12.674, r2change=0.136, Pchange=0.001) and BDNF SNP rs6525 genotype (Fchange=4.707, r2change=0.048, Pchange=0.033) with CPT at the time of initial recruitment (Fig. 5A and B). Neither of the other 2 QST measures (MPT or PPT) were significantly associated with genotype or gene expression. Though the sample size for patients in the chronic condition was not sufficient to assess the presence of genotype associations with long-term outcomes, QST measures taken at the time of recruitment and at the 6-month follow-up were significantly correlated for CPT (rP=0.698, P=0.000), MPT (rP=0.352, P=0.026), and PPT (rP=0.730, P=0.000), suggesting that these measures are stable over time and associations present in acute pain outcomes are likely relevant to predicting chronic pain burden for those that do not resolve.

FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5:
COMT SNP rs4680 genotype and BDNF SNP rs6525 genotype are significantly associated with cold pain threshold (CPT) at the time of initial recruitment regardless of whether they would go on to resolve quickly or to develop CLBP. A, Participants homozygous for the minor allele (Met/Met) at the COMT SNP rs4680 had increased sensitivity (lower threshold) for cold pain. B, Participants carrying at least 1 minor allele at BDNF rs6525 also exhibited lower CPT thresholds. *Statistical significance.

DISCUSSION

While prognostic indicators for the development of chronic pain, whether following injury or surgery, remain incompletely understood, the value of being able to predict individual patient pain trajectories cannot be overstated. For LBP, a set of variables that could be applied early in an acute episode to reduce risk for CLBP, with its associated negative effects on function and quality of life, requires that we first identify the highest priority variables playing a role in the acute to chronic transition.

The present study was designed to explore potential associations between polymorphisms and/or expression of 2 pain-relevant candidate genes (COMT and BDNF), acute pain sensitivity, and the transition to chronic pain in a population with idiopathic LBP. Our findings show that there are distinct somatosensory alterations present at the onset of LBP that differentiate those whose pain will resolve (ALBP) and those who will go on to develop CLBP. Significantly, we found that participants who developed CLBP showed selective pain sensitivity enhancement in both the area of pain and at a remote location at the time of pain onset compared with those who resolved. The CLBP group exhibited hyperalgesia to cold and mechanical stimuli as well as significant DMA to brush stimulation on the painful area of the lower back. Our findings are also in agreement with prior reports that widespread pressure and cold hypersensitivity co-occur in other chronic musculoskeletal disorders (eg, spinal pain, fibromyalgia, temporomandibular joint disorder, and whiplash associated disorder.59–63 Importantly, widespread cold pain hypersensitivity may serve as a risk factor for increased central sensitization and risk for developing chronic pain, particularly neuropathic pain64 and has previously been associated with COMT genotype elsewhere.65 DMA to brush stimulation is a prevalent characteristic of neuropathic pain conditions resulting from peripheral sensitization of C-fibers and/or activation of sensory neurons responsive to low threshold mechanical stimulation (eg, Aβ fibers).66–69 Overall, the QST profile of the CLBP group suggests engagement of a neuropathic process early on and may reflect a difference in the source of the LBP episode and/or individual differences in the nervous system response to an acute painful episode. While alterations in somatosensory function may be expected in a population already experiencing chronic pain, the present QST findings offer novel insight into the processes engaged early during the LBP episode that may increase risk for CLBP as these participants are recruited during an acute LBP episode and have not already developed a chronic pain disorder. This study extends findings from the literature measuring pain sensitivity differences between ALBP and CLBP patients.70 Moreover, we provide evidence for a profile of pain hypersensitivity and increased pain burden beginning early in the pain episode, before any emergence of other indicators of persistence, suggesting a unique profile of somatosensory and self-report parameters that can help identify those at risk for CLBP.

While the mechanism underlying the relationship between this “neuropathic” profile and risk for CLBP remains to be fully elucidated, it does provide evidence in support of precision pain management strategies tailored specifically to combat the processes engaged in neuropathic pain and, potentially, prevent or reduce the likelihood of transition to CLBP. QST and molecular profiling have already been identified as relevant variables on which to base stratification of neuropathic pain patients for more precise diagnosis and treatment.71 One benefit of the current findings is that they suggest an early profile of responding that could be used to stratify those with the greatest risk of CLBP for intervention with specific strategies targeting neuropathic processes early on.

COMT genotype was significantly associated with cold pain sensitivity (on the lower back and the remote area) and pain burden (BPI) as well as the development of CLBP while COMT expression was associated only with the likelihood of transitioning to CLBP and not with specific somatosensory alterations. The literature regarding COMT genotypic effects on pain sensitivity, susceptibility, and outcomes has been mixed but the present findings help to refine our understanding of the complex role of COMT in CLBP. Much of the relevant data for CLBP has focused on postsurgical outcomes following lumbar discectomy and other interventions while our study is restricted to patients with idiopathic LBP without a diagnosis of organic disease or malformation. Prior work by Rut et al72 evaluated the relationship between polymorphisms of COMT (rs4680: A>G—Val158Met, rs6269: A>G, rs4633: C>T, rs4818: C>G) and pain sensitivity after lumbar discectomy. Minor allele carriers were characterized by the lowest preoperative scores related to pain intensity and lower pain intensity at 1 year after the surgery. Patients with COMT haplotype associated with low metabolic activity of the enzyme demonstrated significant clinical improvement in pain intensity score, lower disability and pain intensity at 1 year after the surgery. Another study examined COMT polymorphisms in patients with CLBP for duration of >1 year resulting from discogenic disc disease who were treated with lumbar fusion or cognitive therapy and exercises.73 SNPs adjusted for covariates revealed associations of rs4633 and rs4680 with posttreatment pain reduction, with a tendency for greater improvement among heterozygous patients compared with the homozygous. In contrast, some have failed to confirm associations among COMT polymorphisms and basic or clinical pain sensitivity, risk of chronic pain, or poor treatment outcomes.74,75 For example, the COMT Val158Met SNP was not found to increase risk disc herniation in 1 report, however, Met/Met patients had more pain and slower recovery than those with Val/Met, which in turn also had more pain and slower recovery than those with Val/Val suggesting that genotype contributes to the progression of disc herniation symptoms.76,77 In an 11-year follow-up study of patients who underwent lumbar fusion or nonoperative treatment for painful DDD, disability at baseline was significantly associated with COMT SNPs rs4818, rs6269, and rs4633. However, no significant associations were observed for COMT at long-term follow-up. The size and design of the present study cohort do not allow direct evaluation of relationships between long-term pain burden and COMT genotype; however, the present findings that COMT genotype was associated with acute pain burden, somatosensory functional differences, and risk for the development of CLBP as well as the presence of strong correlations between acute and chronic pain measures suggest that the relationships seen during acute pain may hold true for the chronic state as well.

Our phenotyping data suggest that a neuropathic process may be engaged early on in those that will go on to develop CLBP. The A allele, encoding the shift from valine to methionine at codon 158, is typically described as the “risk” allele for its associations with lower enzymatic activity, higher anxiety, decreased stress resilience, and increased pain sensitivity in normal and inflammatory conditions.36,78 However, our findings are in agreement with reports that pharmacological inhibition of COMT enzymatic activity, a treatment that mimics the reduced activity seen in the presence of the A allele at rs4860, reverses neuropathic pain in a rat model of spinal nerve ligation.79 This pattern of results would be expected if early engagement of a neuropathic mechanism contributes to the development of CLBP. The present findings are in agreement with other reports of increased chronic pain risk following clinical and exercise-induced shoulder pain for participants with genotypes indicative of low COMT activity, though this association was only true for participants also reporting high levels of pain catastrophizing.42,80 Taken together, these findings lend support to the hypothesis that inherited factors help shape an individual’s profile of risk for chronic pain and also provide further evidence this profile is linked to the balance of neuropathic processes engaged during an acute pain episode. Further supporting this argument, the CLBP group were hypersensitive to painful mechanical and cold stimuli compared with the acute pain group, in direct agreement with the phenotype observed in the animal model of neuropathic pain for which COMT inhibition was therapeutic.

We also assessed associations between BDNF SNP genotype and pain outcomes. Presence of the minor allele for the common BDNF SNP rs6265 (Val66Met) is associated with reduced activity-dependent synaptic release of BDNF.81,82 Carriers of the minor allele A, encoding the valine to methionine substitution, exhibit higher risk and severity for dysmenorrhea, increased analgesic need in medication-overuse headache, and increased sensitivity to experimental pain.83–85 Moreover, A allele carriers with chronic pain exhibit augmented cortical pain responding to painful stimulation, suggesting that the effects of BDNF polymorphisms may be the result of alterations in central pain processing centers as opposed to peripheral, but this is an issue for further investigation. We evaluated BDNF mRNA expression in circulating peripheral blood, which may explain the lack of agreement between our data and the data reported by others evaluating relationships between BDNF expression in specific pain-relevant tissues and pain sensitivity. Recently, Dorsey and colleagues have shown that TrkB.T1, the truncated isoform of the BDNF receptor TrkB is upregulated in animal models following noxious stimulation and its presence is associated with the emergence of chronic pain.86–88 However, as with COMT, the findings have been mixed with others failing to find a significant relationship between BDNF rs6525 genotype, BDNF expression and pain outcomes for fibromyalgia89 and migraine.90,91 The present findings suggest that the reduced BDNF activity linked to the presence of ≥1 minor alleles could reduce risk for CLBP, potentially through a reduction in BDNF signaling-dependent neuropathic pain processes.

CONCLUSIONS

Before health care professionals can deliver precision interventions and improve long-term health outcomes for CLBP patients, we must first understand the heritable (eg, genetic) and environmental factors that contribute to risk and/or susceptibility to CLBP. With the present findings, we contribute to a body of literature addressing the complex contribution(s) of COMT and BDNF to the heritability of chronic pain susceptibility. These potential mechanisms of risk may prove instrumental in identifying effective pharmacological and nonpharmacological precision pain management strategies.

REFERENCES

1. Hoy D, March L, Brooks P, et al. The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:968–974.
2. Hoy DG, Smith E, Cross M, et al. The global burden of musculoskeletal conditions for 2010: an overview of methods. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:982–989.
3. Axen I, Leboeuf-Yde C. Trajectories of low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2013;27:601–612.
4. Ramond-Roquin A, Pecquenard F, Schers H, et al. Psychosocial, musculoskeletal and somatoform comorbidity in patients with chronic low back pain: original results from the Dutch Transition Project. Fam Pract. 2015;32:297–304.
5. Hansen BB, Hansen P, Carrino JA, et al. Imaging in mechanical back pain: anything new? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2016;30:766–785.
6. Fritz JM, Brennan GP, Hunter SJ. Physical therapy or advanced imaging as first management strategy following a new consultation for low back pain in primary care: associations with future health care utilization and charges. Health Serv Res. 2015;50:1927–1940.
7. Webster LR, Markman J. Medical management of chronic low back pain: efficacy and outcomes. Neuromodulation. 2014;17 (S2):18–23.
8. Von Korff M, Shortreed SM, Saunders KW, et al. Comparison of back pain prognostic risk stratification item sets. J Pain. 2014;15:81–89.
9. Pinheiro MB, Morosoli JJ, Colodro-Conde L, et al. Genetic and environmental influences to low back pain and symptoms of depression and anxiety: a population-based twin study. J Psychosom Res. 2018;105:92–98.
10. Livshits G, Popham M, Malkin I, et al. Lumbar disc degeneration and genetic factors are the main risk factors for low back pain in women: the UK Twin Spine Study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:1740–1745.
11. MacGregor AJ, Andrew T, Sambrook PN, et al. Structural, psychological, and genetic influences on low back and neck pain: a study of adult female twins. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51:160–167.
12. Costigan M, Belfer I, Griffin RS, et al. Multiple chronic pain states are associated with a common amino acid-changing allele in KCNS1. Brain. 2010;133:2519–2527.
13. Williams FM, Bansal AT, van Meurs JB, et al. Novel genetic variants associated with lumbar disc degeneration in northern Europeans: a meta-analysis of 4600 subjects. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72:1141–1148.
14. Binch AL, Cole AA, Breakwell LM, et al. Expression and regulation of neurotrophic and angiogenic factors during human intervertebral disc degeneration. Arthritis Res Ther. 2014;16:416.
15. Ren K, Dubner R. Pain facilitation and activity-dependent plasticity in pain modulatory circuitry: role of BDNF-TrkB signaling and NMDA receptors. Mol Neurobiol. 2007;35:224–235.
16. Zhou LJ, Zhong Y, Ren WJ, et al. BDNF induces late-phase LTP of C-fiber evoked field potentials in rat spinal dorsal horn. Exp Neurol. 2008;212:507–514.
17. Salio C, Lossi L, Ferrini F, et al. Ultrastructural evidence for a pre- and postsynaptic localization of full-length trkB receptors in substantia gelatinosa (lamina II) of rat and mouse spinal cord. Eur J Neurosci. 2005;22:1951–1966.
18. Nicol GD, Vasko MR. Unraveling the story of NGF-mediated sensitization of nociceptive sensory neurons: ON or OFF the Trks? Mol Interv. 2007;7:26–41.
19. Nie H, Madeleine P, Arendt-Nielsen L, et al. Temporal summation of pressure pain during muscle hyperalgesia evoked by nerve growth factor and eccentric contractions. Eur J Pain. 2009;13:704–710.
20. Yukhananov R, Kissin I. Persistent changes in spinal cord gene expression after recovery from inflammatory hyperalgesia: a preliminary study on pain memory. BMC Neurosci. 2008;9:32.
21. Jacobsen LM, Eriksen GS, Pedersen LM, et al. Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibition reduces spinal nociceptive activity. Neurosci Lett. 2010;473:212–215.
22. Thompson SW, Bennett DL, Kerr BJ, et al. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor is an endogenous modulator of nociceptive responses in the spinal cord. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:7714–7718.
23. Miletic G, Hanson EN, Miletic V. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor-elicited or sciatic ligation-associated phosphorylation of cyclic AMP response element binding protein in the rat spinal dorsal horn is reduced by block of tyrosine kinase receptors. Neurosci Lett. 2004;361:269–271.
24. McMahon SB, Cafferty WB. Neurotrophic influences on neuropathic pain. Novartis Found Symp. 2004;261:68–92; discussion 92–102, 149–154.
25. Pezet S, McMahon SB. Neurotrophins: mediators and modulators of pain. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2006;29:507–538.
26. Massat I, Souery D, Del-Favero J, et al. Association between COMT (Val158Met) functional polymorphism and early onset in patients with major depressive disorder in a European multicenter genetic association study. Mol Psychiatry. 2005;10:598–605.
27. Craddock N, O’Donovan MC, Owen MJ. Genes for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder? Implications for psychiatric nosology. Schizophr Bull. 2006;32:9–16.
28. Belfer I, Segall SK, Lariviere WR, et al. Pain modality- and sex-specific effects of COMT genetic functional variants. Pain. 2013;154:1368–1376.
29. Segall SK, Nackley AG, Diatchenko L, et al. Comt1 genotype and expression predicts anxiety and nociceptive sensitivity in inbred strains of mice. Genes Brain Behav. 2010;9:933–946.
30. Diatchenko L, Slade GD, Nackley AG, et al. Genetic basis for individual variations in pain perception and the development of a chronic pain condition. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14:135–143.
31. Nackley AG, Diatchenko L. Assessing potential functionality of catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) polymorphisms associated with pain sensitivity and temporomandibular joint disorders. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;617:375–393.
32. Mogil JS. Pain genetics: past, present and future. Trends Genet. 2012;28:258–266.
33. Mogil JS, Yu L, Basbaum AI. Pain genes?: Natural variation and transgenic mutants. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2000;23:777–811.
34. Segall SK, Maixne W, Belfer I, et al. Janus molecule I: dichotomous effects of COMT in neuropathic vs nociceptive pain modalities. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2012;11:222–235.
35. Young EE, Kelly DL, Shim I, et al. Variations in COMT and NTRK2 influence symptom burden in women undergoing breast cancer treatment. Biol Res Nurs. 2017;19:318–328.
36. Zubieta JK, Heitzeg MM, Smith YR, et al. COMT val158met genotype affects mu-opioid neurotransmitter responses to a pain stressor. Science. 2003;299:1240–1243.
37. Belfer I, Segall S. COMT genetic variants and pain. Drugs Today. 2011;47:457–467.
38. Desmeules J, Chabert J, Rebsamen M, et al. Central pain sensitization, COMT Val158Met polymorphism, and emotional factors in fibromyalgia. J Pain. 2014;15:129–135.
39. Hartung JE, Ciszek BP, Nackley AG. beta2- and beta3-adrenergic receptors drive COMT-dependent pain by increasing production of nitric oxide and cytokines. Pain. 2014;155:1346–1355.
40. Meloto CB, Segall SK, Smith S, et al. COMT gene locus: new functional variants. Pain. 2015;156:2072–2083.
41. Qayyum A, Zai CC, Hirata Y, et al. The role of the Catechol-o-Methyltransferase (COMT) GeneVal158Met in aggressive behavior, a review of genetic studies. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2015;13:802–814.
42. George SZ, Wallace MR, Wright TW, et al. Evidence for a biopsychosocial influence on shoulder pain: pain catastrophizing and catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) diplotype predict clinical pain ratings. Pain. 2008;136:53–61.
43. Ha SO, Kim JK, Hong HS, et al. Expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in rat dorsal root ganglia, spinal cord and gracile nuclei in experimental models of neuropathic pain. Neuroscience. 2001;107:301–309.
44. Li L, Xian CJ, Zhong JH, et al. Upregulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in the sensory pathway by selective motor nerve injury in adult rats. Neurotox Res. 2006;9:269–283.
45. Pezet S, Malcangio M, Lever IJ, et al. Noxious stimulation induces Trk receptor and downstream ERK phosphorylation in spinal dorsal horn. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2002;21:684–695.
46. Coull JA, Beggs S, Boudreau D, et al. BDNF from microglia causes the shift in neuronal anion gradient underlying neuropathic pain. Nature. 2005;438:1017–1021.
47. Merighi A, Salio C, Ghirri A, et al. BDNF as a pain modulator. Prog Neurobiol. 2008;85:297–317.
48. de Vet HC, Heymans MW, Dunn KM, et al. Episodes of low back pain: a proposal for uniform definitions to be used in research. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002;27:2409–2416.
49. Keller S, Bann CM, Dodd SL, et al. Validity of the Brief Pain Inventory for use in documenting the outcomes of patients with noncancer pain. Clin J Pain. 2004;20:309–318.
50. Melzack R. The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Pain. 1987;30:191–197.
51. Melzack R, Katz JTurk DC, Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: appraisal and current status. Handbook of Pain Assessment, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2001:35–52.
52. Belfer I, Dai F. Phenotyping and genotyping neuropathic pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2010;14:203–212.
53. Starkweather AR, Heineman A, Storey S, et al. Methods to measure peripheral and central sensitization using quantitative sensory testing: a focus on individuals with low back pain. Appl Nurs Res. 2016;29:237–241.
54. Starkweather AR, Ramesh D, Lyon DE, et al. Acute low back pain: differential somatosensory function and gene expression compared to healthy no-pain controls. Clin J Pain. 2016;32:933–939.
55. Ramesh D, D'Agata A, Starkweather A, et al. Contribution of endocannabinoid gene expression and genotype on low back pain susceptibility and chronicity. Clin J Pain. 2017;34:8–14.
56. Campbell P, Foster NE, Thomas E, et al. Prognostic indicators of low back pain in primary care: five-year prospective study. J Pain. 2013;14:873–883.
57. Gatchel RJ. Comorbidity of chronic pain and mental health disorders: the biopsychosocial perspective. Am Psychol. 2004;59:795–805.
58. Starkweather AR, Lyon DE, Kinser P, et al. Comparison of low back pain recovery and persistence: a descriptive study of characteristics at pain onset. Biol Res Nurs. 2016;18:401–410.
59. O’Sullivan P, Waller R, Wright A, et al. Sensory characteristics of chronic non-specific low back pain: a subgroup investigation. Man Ther. 2014;19:311–318.
60. Steinmetz A, Jull GA. Sensory and sensorimotor features in violinists and violists with neck pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:2523–2528.
61. Smith BW, Tooley EM, Montague EQ, et al. Habituation and sensitization to heat and cold pain in women with fibromyalgia and healthy controls. Pain. 2008;140:420–428.
62. Park JW, Clark GT, Kim YK, et al. Analysis of thermal pain sensitivity and psychological profiles in different subgroups of TMD patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;39:968–974.
63. Wright A, Benson HAE, Will R, et al. Cold pain threshold identifies a subgroup of individuals with knee osteoarthritis that present with multimodality hyperalgesia and elevated pain levels. Clin J Pain. 2017;33:793–803.
64. Goldsmith R, Wright C, Bell SF, et al. Cold hyperalgesia as a prognostic factor in whiplash associated disorders: a systematic review. Man Ther. 2012;17:402–410.
65. Kim H, Mittal DP, Iadarola MJ, et al. Genetic predictors for acute experimental cold and heat pain sensitivity in humans. J Med Genet. 2006;43:e40.
66. Haanpaa M. Assessment and mechanisms of mechanical allodynia. Scand J Pain. 2011;2:7–8.
67. Haanpaa M, Attal N, Backonja M, et al. NeuPSIG guidelines on neuropathic pain assessment. Pain. 2011;152:14–27.
68. Ng TS, Pedler A, Vicenzino B, et al. Less efficacious conditioned pain modulation and sensory hypersensitivity in chronic whiplash-associated disorders in Singapore. Clin J Pain. 2014;30:436–442.
69. Li X, Kim JS, van Wijnen AJ, et al. Osteoarthritic tissues modulate functional properties of sensory neurons associated with symptomatic OA pain. Mol Biol Rep. 2011;38:5335–5339.
70. Giesecke T, Gracely RH, Grant MA, et al. Evidence of augmented central pain processing in idiopathic chronic low back pain. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:613–623.
71. Themistocleous AC, Crombez G, Baskozos G, et al. Using stratified medicine to understand, diagnose, and treat neuropathic pain. Pain. 2018;159 (suppl 1):S31–S42.
72. Rut M, Machoy-Mokrzynska A, Reclawowicz D, et al. Influence of variation in the catechol-O-methyltransferase gene on the clinical outcome after lumbar spine surgery for one-level symptomatic disc disease: a report on 176 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014;156:245–252.
73. Omair A, Lie BA, Reikeras O, et al. Genetic contribution of catechol-O-methyltransferase variants in treatment outcome of low back pain: a prospective genetic association study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2012;13:76.
74. Kim H, Neubert JK, San Miguel A, et al. Genetic influence on variability in human acute experimental pain sensitivity associated with gender, ethnicity and psychological temperament. Pain. 2004;109:488–496.
75. Kim H, Lee H, Rowan J, et al. Genetic polymorphisms in monoamine neurotransmitter systems show only weak association with acute post-surgical pain in humans. Mol Pain. 2006;2:24.
76. Skouen JS, Smith AJ, Warrington NM, et al. Genetic variation in the beta-2 adrenergic receptor is associated with chronic musculoskeletal complaints in adolescents. Eur J Pain. 2012;16:1232–1242.
77. Jacobsen LM, Schistad EI, Storesund A, et al. The COMT rs4680 Met allele contributes to long-lasting low back pain, sciatica and disability after lumbar disc herniation. Eur J Pain. 2012;16:1064–1069.
78. Tammimaki A, Mannisto PT. Catechol-O-methyltransferase gene polymorphism and chronic human pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2012;22:673–691.
79. Kambur O, Mannisto PT, Pusa AM, et al. Nitecapone reduces development and symptoms of neuropathic pain after spinal nerve ligation in rats. Eur J Pain. 2011;15:732–740.
80. George SZ, Dover GC, Wallace MR, et al. Biopsychosocial influence on exercise-induced delayed onset muscle soreness at the shoulder: pain catastrophizing and catechol-o-methyltransferase (COMT) diplotype predict pain ratings. Clin J Pain. 2008;24:793–801.
81. Egan MF, Kojima M, Callicott JH, et al. The BDNF val66met polymorphism affects activity-dependent secretion of BDNF and human memory and hippocampal function. Cell. 2003;112:257–269.
82. Gatt JM, Nemeroff CB, Dobson-Stone C, et al. Interactions between BDNF Val66Met polymorphism and early life stress predict brain and arousal pathways to syndromal depression and anxiety. Mol Psychiatry. 2009;14:681–695.
83. Lee L-C, Tu C-H, Chen L-F, et al. Association of brain-derived Neurotrophic Factor Gene Val66Met Polymorphism with primary dysmenorrhea. PLOS One. 2014;9:e112766.
84. Di Lorenzo C, Di Lorenzo G, Sances G, et al. Drug consumption in medication overuse headache is influenced by brain-derived neurotrophic factor Val66Met polymorphism. J Headache Pain. 2009;10:349–355.
85. Wei S-Y, Chao H-T, Tu C-H, et al. The BDNF Val66Met polymorphism is associated with the functional connectivity dynamics of pain modulatory systems in primary dysmenorrhea. Sci Rep. 2016;6:23639.
86. Guo W, Zou S, Guan Y, et al. Tyrosine phosphorylation of the NR2B subunit of the NMDA receptor in the spinal cord during the development and maintenance of inflammatory hyperalgesia. J Neurosci. 2002;22:6208–6217.
87. Renn CL, Lin L, Thomas S, et al. Full-length tropomyosin-related kinase B expression in the brainstem in response to persistent inflammatory pain. Neuroreport. 2006;17:1175–1179.
88. Renn CL, Leitch CC, Dorsey SG. In vivo evidence that truncated trkB.T1 participates in nociception. Mol Pain. 2009;5:61–61.
89. Xiao Y, Russell IJ, Liu YG. A brain-derived neurotrophic factor polymorphism Val66Met identifies fibromyalgia syndrome subgroup with higher body mass index and C-reactive protein. Rheumatol Int. 2012;32:2479–2485.
90. Marziniak M, Herzog AL, Mossner R, et al. Investigation of the functional brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene variant Val66MET in migraine. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2008;115:1321–1325.
91. Sutherland HG, Maher BH, Rodriguez-Acevedo AJ, et al. Investigation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene variants in migraine. Headache. 2014;54:1184–1193.
Keywords:

low back pain; chronic pain; genetics; quantitative sensory testing

Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.