Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Postoperative Analgesia by a Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Using Different Concentrations of Ropivacaine for Abdominal Surgery

A Meta-Analysis

Sun, Ni MD*; Wang, Shouyong MD†,‡; Ma, Pengpeng MD§; Liu, Shuting MD; Shao, Aijie BD; Xiong, Ling MD

doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000468
Review Articles

Background: Transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) has been proven to be an effective means of postoperative anesthesia, but the optimum effective concentration of ropivacaine warrants further research.

Objective: This study aimed to identify the optimal ropivacaine concentration of TAPB using a meta-analysis.

Materials and Methods: This study consisted of a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We searched online databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Web of Science. RCTs investigating the 24-hour postoperative opioid consumption and the rest and dynamic pain scores 2, 12, and 24 hours after surgery were included in this analysis. We also assessed opioid-related side-effects and patient satisfaction 24 hours after surgery.

Results: Nineteen RCTs (1217 patients) were included in this meta-analysis, which showed that only TAPB with 0.375% and 0.5% ropivacaine was able to reduce opioid consumption 24 hours after surgery by weighted mean differences of −6.55 and −4.44 mg (morphine IV equivalents), respectively (P<0.05). A meta-regression analysis did not reveal an association between the local anesthetic dose (in mg), surgery, anesthesia, block timing, and the TAPB effect on opioid consumption. Ropivacaine concentrations of 0.375% and 0.5% reduced the 2-hour postoperative pain score and reduced the incidence of nausea and vomiting, but this analgesic effect disappeared at 12 and 24 hours. Only TAPB with 0.375% ropivacaine improved the degree of satisfaction 24 hours after surgery (weighted mean difference of 0.87 [0.08-1.66], P=0.03).

Conclusion: In terms of efficacy and safety, the use of 0.375% ropivacaine for TAPB is preferred in the clinical work.

*Department of Anesthsioloy

§Department of Intensive Care Unit, Binzhou People’s Hospital, Binzhou, Shandong

Department of Anesthesiology, Weihai City Hospital, Weihai

Department of Anesthesiology, Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University

Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, China International Science and Technology Cooperation base of Child Development and Critical Disorders, Chonqing

Department of Anesthsioloy, Sichuan Province People’s Hospital, Sichuan, China

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Reprints: Shouyong Wang, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, China International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Child Development and Critical Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, No. 136 of Zhongshan 2nd Road, Chonqing 400014, China (e-mail:

Received February 17, 2016

Received in revised form March 14, 2017

Accepted December 7, 2016

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.