Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Patients With Neck Pain are Less Likely to Improve if They Experience Poor Sleep Quality: A Prospective Study in Routine Practice

Kovacs, Francisco M. MD, PhD*†; Seco, Jesús MD, PhD†‡§; Royuela, Ana PhD†∥¶; Melis, Sergio PT†#; Sánchez, Carlos PT†**; Díaz-Arribas, María J. PT, PhD†††; Meli, Marcelo MD†,‡‡; Núñez, Montserrat MD, PhD†,§§; Martínez-Rodríguez, María E. MD†,∥∥; Fernández, Carmen MD, PhD†,¶¶; Gestoso, Mario MD†,##; Mufraggi, Nicole MD†,##; Moyá, Jordi MD†,***; Rodríguez-Pérez, Vicente PT†,†††; Torres-Unda, Jon PT, PhD†,‡‡‡; Burgos-Alonso, Natalia PhD†,§§§; Gago-Fernández, Inés PT†,†††; Abraira, Víctor PhD†∥¶

doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000147
Original Articles
Buy

Objective: To assess whether sleep quality (SQ) at baseline is associated with improvement in pain and disability at 3 months.

Materials and Methods: Four hundred twenty-two subacute and chronic patients with neck pain (NP) were recruited in 32 physiotherapy, primary care, and specialized centers. NP, referred pain, disability, catastrophizing, depression, and SQ were assessed through validated questionnaires, upon recruitment and 3 months later. Correlations between baseline scores were calculated through the Spearman coefficient. Improvements in NP, disability, and SQ were defined as a reduction of ≥30% of baseline score. Six estimative logistic regression models were developed to assess the association between baseline SQ and improvement of NP, baseline SQ and improvement of disability, baseline NP and improvement of SQ, baseline disability and improvement of SQ, the evolutions of NP and SQ, and the evolutions of disability and SQ.

Results: Most patients were subacute and mildly impaired. Regression models showed that better SQ at baseline was associated with improvement of NP (odds ratio=0.91 [95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.99]), but not disability (1.04 [0.95-1.13]); the improvement of SQ was associated with more severe NP at baseline (1.26 [1.07-1.49)], but not with baseline disability (0.99 [0.97-1.02]); and that improvement in SQ was associated with improvements in NP (3.48 [1.68-7.20]), and disability (5.02 [2.39-10.11]).

Discussion: NP is less likely to improve in patients with poorer SQ, irrespective of age, sex, catastrophizing, depression, or treatments prescribed for NP. Future studies should confirm these results with more severely impaired patients.

*Departamento Científico

Spanish Back Pain Research Network, Fundación Kovacs

‡‡IBaD Clínica del Dolor-Majorca Spine and Pain Clinic

¶¶Centro Salud Arquitecto Bennassar

##Unidad de la Espalda Kovacs, Hospital de Cruz Roja Española, Palma de Mallorca

#Centro de Fisioterapia Sergio Melis/Ronda Oeste, Mallorca

Institute of Biomedicine (IBIOMED), University of León

‡‡‡Departamento de Fisiología, Universidad de El País Vasco (UPV/EHU), Campus Universitario, Guipúzcoa

§University of the Basque Country, Campus Universitario, Basque Country

†††Escuela Universitaria Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de León, Campus Universitario, Ponferrada, León

CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP)

§§Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona

Unidad de Bioestadística Clínica

∥∥Sección de Rehabilitación Reumatológica, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, IRICYS

††Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid

**Fisys Fisioterapia, Cantabria

***Unidad del Dolor, Hospital Mateu Orfila, Mahón

§§§Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Universidad de El País Vasco (UPV/EHU), Campus Universitario, Vizcaya, Spain

F.M.K., J.S., A.R., and V.A.: drafted the first version of the study protocol. All the authors have contributed substantially to the conception and design of this study. J.S., S.M., C.S., M.J.D.-A., M.M., A.R., M.N., M.E.M.-R., C.F., M.G., N.M., J.M., V.R.-P., J.T.-U, and N.B.-A., I.G.-F.: contributed to data gathering, and F.M.K., A.R., and V.A.: to data analysis and interpretation. F.M.K. and A.R.: drafted the first version of this manuscript. All the authors have revised it for important intellectual content, and have approved the final version. All authors accept public responsibility for this study and its conclusions.

Supported by the Kovacs Foundation, Baleares, Spain, a Spanish not-for-profit Institution which has no links to the health industry and specializes in neck and back pain research. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Reprints: Francisco M. Kovacs, MD, PhD, Departamento Científico, Fundación Kovacs, Paseo Mallorca 36, 3°, 1a, Palma de Mallorca 07012, Spain (e-mail: fmkovacs@kovacs.org).

Received August 5, 2014

Received in revised form September 8, 2014

Accepted August 9, 2014

Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.