ArticleKeratoconus Association with Axial Myopia: A Prospective Biometric StudyErnst, Benjamin J. M.D.; Hsu, Hugo Y. M.D.Author Information From the Department of Ophthalmology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO. The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to disclose. This work was presented in part at the 2008 Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) annual meeting in Ft. Lauderdale, FL. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Hugo Y. Hsu, M.D., Department of Ophthalmology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, 1755 South Grand Blvd., Saint Louis, MO 63104; e-mail: [email protected] Accepted September 6, 2010. Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice: January 2011 - Volume 37 - Issue 1 - p 2-5 doi: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e3181fb2119 Buy Metrics Abstract Objectives: To determine if the axial length and its components are significantly different between a keratoconic eye and an emmetropic eye and also to determine if the degree of corneal ectasia is associated with axial myopia in a keratoconic eye. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted with keratoconic patients and emmetropic controls. All subjects underwent corneal topography analysis and axial length measurement by immersion-ultrasound biometry. Statistical methods were employed to compare the two groups and to ascertain whether any associations exist. Results: The axial length, anterior chamber depth, and posterior segment length were all significantly longer in the keratoconic group (n=41) than in the emmetropic control group (n=33) in a statistically significant fashion. The mean keratoconic axial length was 24.40 vs. 23.24 mm for the emmetropic group (P=0.001). The mean keratometry for the keratoconic group correlated with spherical equivalence and visual acuity in statistically significant manners but not with axial length. Conclusions: Keratoconic eyes have on average longer axial lengths that are primarily because of longer posterior segment lengths than emmetropic eyes. This finding should be considered in keratoconic patients undergoing keratoplasty because it relates to postkeratoplasty refractive outcomes. © 2011 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.