Secondary Logo

Share this article on:

The Efficacy of Sustained Heat Treatment on Delayed-Onset Muscle Soreness

Petrofsky, Jerrold PhD, JD*; Berk, Lee DPH*; Bains, Gurinder MD*; Khowailed, Iman Akef DSc; Lee, Haneul DSc; Laymon, Michael DSc

Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine: July 2017 - Volume 27 - Issue 4 - p 329–337
doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000375
Original Research

Objective: To assess the impact of heat applied for 8 hours immediately after or 24 hours after exercise on delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS) in large skeletal muscle groups measured by subjective and objective means.

Design: Cross-sectional repeated measure design study.

Setting: Research laboratory.

Subjects: Three groups of 20 subjects, age range 20 to 40 years.

Intervention: Squats were conducted in three 5-minute bouts to initiate DOMS; 3 minutes of rest separated the bouts. One group had heat applied immediately after exercise, and a second group had heat applied 24 hours after exercise. A third group was the control group where no heat was applied.

Main Outcome Measures: Visual analog pain scales, muscle strength of quads, range of motion of quads, stiffness of quads (Continuous Passive Motion machine), algometer to measure quadriceps soreness, and blood myoglobin.

Results: The most significant outcome was a reduction in soreness in the group that had low-temperature heat wraps applied immediately after exercise (P < 0.01). There was benefit to applying heat 24 hours after exercise, but to a smaller extent. This was corroborated by myoglobin, algometer, and stiffness data.

Conclusions: Low-level continuous heat wraps left for 8 hours just after heavy exercise reduced DOMS in the population tested as assessed by subjective and objective measures.

Clinical Relevance: Although cold is commonly used after heavy exercise to reduce soreness, heat applied just after exercise seems very effective in reducing soreness. Unlike cold, it increases flexibility of tissue and tissue blood flow. For joint, it is still probably better to use cold to reduce swelling.

*Department of Physical Therapy, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California;

Department of Physical Therapy, Touro University, Henderson, Nevada; and

Department of Physical Therapy, Gachon University, Incheon, South Korea.

Corresponding Author: Jerrold Petrofsky, PhD, JD, Research Department of Physical Therapy, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92350 (jpetrofsky@llu.edu).

Supported by a contract from Pfizer pharmaceuticals contract number WI173615.

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Received July 16, 2013

Accepted April 01, 2016

Back to Top | Article Outline

INTRODUCTION

Muscle soreness is a common phenomenon especially in people who exercise infrequently or athletes who exceed their normal workout intensity.1–5 Delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS) symptoms can range from mild irritation to severe pain that forms a psychological barrier inhibiting performance in subsequent days.3,6 As a general rule, the intensity and duration of the symptoms vary with age, nutrition, and physical condition.6 The DOMS is greater in intensity and duration in older individuals and individuals with diabetes.6–8 However, other factors can also reduce the duration and intensity of DOMS.

Ingestion of branched chain amino acids has been shown to reduce DOMS in older people and people with diabetes.9,10 Many other strategies have also been tried.11 The most common strategies involve thermal modalities or massage.11,12 Vibration has also been used to reduce DOMS.13 But the most common modality used to reduce DOMS is heat and cold.11,12,14 Recent studies have shown a positive effect of heat in reducing DOMS.12 Although 20-minute heat modalities have poor results, sustained heat does seem to help.12 Cold is the most commonly recommended modality after heavy exercise.10,14 Cold water immersion, in some studies, may slow down the repair process in muscle after exercise that induces DOMS.15 However, in other studies, it did not.14 The issues in many of these previous studies were that, comparing one study to another, the muscles exercised were different, the actual exercise protocol was different, the exercise intensities and durations were different, and the temperature and type of thermal modality were different as were the measures of DOMS. Other modalities include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), steroids, muscle relaxants, and antidepressants.16 Nonpharmacological intervention includes treatments such as hot and cold and was evaluated in a 2006 Cochrane Review.17,18 Only heat seemed to show a consistent reduction in pain. A problem with heat is the duration. Hydrocollator heat wraps are usually left for 15 minutes. Although this warms the skin, deep heat penetration is poor.19 Furthermore, the use of warm temperature modalities such as whirlpool and other forms of clinical thermal therapy have caused infections of the skin20 and burns in susceptible populations.20 For wounds, heat penetration is not an issue because the wound is superficial. But for deep tissues such as the shoulder, knee, or back, due to the influence of subcutaneous fat, heat penetration is very poor to none in 15 minutes of heat exposure.19 A key to increased healing is temperature penetration both to increase tissue blood flow and metabolism. Generally, for every 3 degrees increase in tissue temperature, metabolism doubles, promoting faster repair of tissue.21 Without good tissue penetration, there is pain relief but little effect on healing. Continuous low-level heat wraps have been shown to penetrate and warm deep tissues.19,22

Therefore, in the present investigation, we compared a common over-the-counter heat modality, ThermaCare heat wraps applied for 8 hours used either immediately after exercise or 24 hours after exercise. It has been well established that heat provided by clinical modalities such as hydrocollator heat packs reduces pain.23 This is mediated by inhibiting purine receptors in the peripheral pain nociceptor pathways through voltage-gated calcium channels sensitive to temperature.24,25 These channels, the TRPV1 and TPRV4 receptors on sensory neurons, are sensitive to hot and warm temperatures, respectively,24,26–28 an often overlooked value of heat in increased healing of damaged tissue.

When heat is applied to wounds, even wounds in people with diabetes that showed no healing for 2 years, there was rapid healing.29–32 Part of this was attributed to an increase in blood flow due to heat,33 but blood flow remained elevated for over 24 hours after a 30-minute heat session showing a carryover that kept the tissue warm. The same was seen for pain relief if a continuous low-level heat wrap was applied. Here 8 hours of continuous heat resulted in 16 hours of pain relief.34,35

The hypothesis was that sustained heat would be very effective immediately after exercise by increasing circulation and healing rates. Rather than simple analog visual pain scales, we used both objective and subjective measures of DOMS. Analog visual pain scales were used, and algometer muscle soreness scales were used as subjective measures, and muscle strength, blood myoglobin, and muscle stiffness were used as objective measures. Measurements were taken 1 day before and 3 days after exercise. A control group had no heat.

Back to Top | Article Outline

SUBJECTS

The subjects for this study were 60 healthy individuals divided randomly into 3 groups of 20 (control, ThermaCare heat wraps applied immediately after exercise, and ThermaCare heat wraps applied 24 hours after exercise). All subjects had at least 6 weeks of physical inactivity, and their body mass index was less than 40. Subjects had no cardiovascular disease, hepatic disease, diabetes, lower limb neuropathies, or recent lower limb injuries. All had blood pressure measurements between 140/90 and 90/60 mm Hg at rest. Subjects were not on alpha or beta agonist/antagonists, any type of NSAID, Cox 2 inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, Pregabalins (Lyrica), or pain reducers. The demographics of the subjects are shown in Table. All methods and procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Loma Linda University, and all subjects signed a statement of informed consent.

TABLE. De

TABLE. De

Back to Top | Article Outline

METHODS

Muscle Strength Measurement

Muscle strength was measured with 4 strain gauges placed on opposite sides of a steel bar. The bar was fixed to a chair base with a leather ankle strap that was placed just above the malleolus and measured force developed during extension by the quadriceps muscle (knee bent at 90 degrees). When the bar was bent, the strain gauges, arranged as a Wheatstone bridge, were deformed and an electrical output was provided to a BioPac (BioPac Systems, Goleta, California) system DAC100 bioelectric amplifier module and MP150 system (gain = 5000, analogue to digital conversion = 1k 24 bits resolution). Data analysis and storage used the Acknowledge 4.1 software from BioPac Inc (BioPac Systems). Muscle strength was determined as the average of 2 contractions, each contraction lasting for 3 seconds in duration with at least 1 minute of rest separating the contractions.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Exercise

To provoke DOMS, the subjects accomplished squats for 5 minutes. An exercise monitor set the pace, and they were instructed to flex the hip past 110 degrees. The pace was set at 3 seconds per squat for 5 minutes repeated after 3 minutes of rest 2 more times (total 3 rounds).

Back to Top | Article Outline

Subjective Pain Measurement

A 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) horizontal line across a piece of paper was used. One end was marked “pain free” and the other “very, very sore.” The subject was asked to place a vertical slash across the line where appropriate. Only one visual analog pain scale was printed on a single sheet of paper. This technique has been recently reviewed and is reliable.36

Back to Top | Article Outline

Blood Sampling

Approximately 5 mL of venous peripheral blood was collected from an antecubital vein using a disposable needle and vacutainer for serum or plasma with a serum separator and whole-blood EDTA before (Pre) and at 48 hours after exercise. The blood was placed in a refrigerated centrifuge and spun at 3000 rpm for 10 minutes to separate the serum or plasma from the cells. The separated serum and plasma aliquots were stored at −80°C until analyses were conducted.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Plasma Biomarker Measurements

A complete blood count was performed using a Mindray BC-3200, including the hematocrit and an automated 3 part white blood cell count. For the measurement of plasma Myoglobin, commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits in a 96-well plate format were used according to the manufacturers' instructions.

  • Plasma myoglobin (MG017C; CalBiotech, Spring Valley, California).
Back to Top | Article Outline

Force to Flex and Extend the Knee

The force to flex and extend the knee was measured from 90 to 125 degrees. The subject was in the seated position with the leg free to hang at an initial angle of 90 degrees with the foot off the floor. A linear actuator was connected through an ankle strap to passively move the knee through 35 degrees of flexion (Figure 1). The force needed to move the knee was measured as a measure of flexibility and elasticity of the quadriceps muscle and its tendons. The rate of movement was 45 degrees in 7.5 seconds. The knee was flexed and then extended, and the force was measured in each direction. Resistive strain gauges (350 Ohms) were arranged as a Wheatstone bride. The bridge output was amplified and conditioned with a DAC100 strain gauge amplifier with a gain of 500 (BioPac Systems). The amplified output was digitized at 2000 Hz with a resolution of 24 bits on an MP150 BioPac data acquisition system (BioPac Systems). A goniometer measured the angle of the knee to calculate the force needed per degree moved.

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 1

Back to Top | Article Outline

Measurement of Range of Motion

Range of motion of the knee was measured by a trained physical therapist with a digital goniometer. Measures were made of full active range of motion and the point during range of motion of the knee where pain was felt, if any, after the exercise.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Heat Therapy

Heat was applied by placing one ThermaCare heat wrap on each leg centered over the quadriceps and lying longitudinally over the muscle. ThermaCare heat wraps use the oxidation of iron through an oxygen-controlled mass reaction to provide constant heat over an 8-hour period through individual cells. The wrap is elastic and held over the sore area by Velcro bands.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Procedures

On each day, subjects entered the room and relaxed in a thermally neutral environment for 20 minutes. Measurements such as leg strength, range of motion, analog visual pain scales, and force to move the leg were recorded. These data were collected on Monday, exercise was accomplished on Tuesday, and then measurements were taken again on Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday. Blood was sampled on Monday and Thursday. One group was the control group and did not use heat. Another group had heat applied by ThermaCare heat wraps immediately after exercise, and a final group had ThermaCare heat wraps 24 hours after exercise. Heat wraps were placed on the long axis of the quadriceps bilaterally for 8 hours.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Data Analysis

Statistical analyses involved the calculation of means and SDs and analysis of variance (ANOVA). The level of significance was P < 0.05.

Blood analytes were measured and the data corrected for changes in serum volume after exercise as per Van Beaulmont et al.37 First, we corrected the hematocrit from venous blood to the true whole-body hematocrit, by multiplying the venous hematocrit value by 0.873. The change in plasma volume after the first day was then calculated, to correct for any shifts in plasma volume that would have affected the concentration of analytes in subsequent measures. The formula we used is shown below:

Where,

Ca = final analyte concentration,

Hct1 = hematocrit on the control day,

Hct2 = hematocrit on the test day,

Cb = analyte test concentration.

Changes in total plasma content of electrolytes and proteins with maximal exercise.37

Back to Top | Article Outline

RESULTS

Strength

There was a significant reduction in the quadriceps strength on the first day after the exercise in the control group (Figure 2). This reduction (P < 0.01) was 23.8% less than the resting (before exercise) strength. For the heat 24-hour group, there was no significant difference in any measure compared with the control group (ANOVA, P > 0.05). In contrast, the heat immediate group showed no significant reduction in strength from rest on any postexercise day (ANOVA, P > 0.05).

FIGURE 2

FIGURE 2

Back to Top | Article Outline

Pain Scale

As can be seen in Figure 3, all subjects showed an increase in pain after the exercise. The pain peaked by 2 days postexercise. The least pain was felt 1 day postexercise and was in the heat immediate group. There was no difference between the other 2 groups after the first day (P > 0.05), whereas the heat immediate group was significantly lower on the pain scale than the other 2 groups on the first and second days postexercise (P < 0.01). By the third day postexercise, there was no significant difference between the groups (P > 0.05).

FIGURE 3

FIGURE 3

Back to Top | Article Outline

Knee Flexion Pain

The knee was passively flexed through full range of motion, and the point where, if any, pain was felt was recorded (Figure 4). Pain was felt on flexing the knee at less than full range of motion on the first, second, and third days postexercise. The only significant difference was seen on the first day postexercise where the heat immediate group could flex their knees much further without pain than was seen for the other 2 groups (P < 0.05). By the second day postexercise, the heat immediate and 24-hour groups showed no significant difference from the resting data (P > 0.05), whereas the control group was significantly less than at rest (P < 0.05).

FIGURE 4

FIGURE 4

Back to Top | Article Outline

Force to Passively Move the Leg

Figure 5 shows the force measured at 110 degrees of flexion. This measuring point was used because the measurement was well after the start of movement (90 degrees) and when the inertia of the leg was brought into motion and when motion was steady state. At this point, there were some differences in the force to move the leg depending on the leg length and girth of the leg from one individual to the next. Therefore, in this figure, all data were normalized in terms of force to flex the knee before the exercise in each subject. There was no difference in force to flex the leg 1 day after the exercise bout. In the group that had heat immediately after the exercise, force stayed constant over the next 2 days. For the group that had no heat, force to move the leg increased significantly in the second and third days (P < 0.01). For the group that had heat applied 24 hours after the exercise, force was significantly less in the second but not third day (P < 0.05). For the control group, force to move the leg stayed constant for the first day after exercise and then increased significantly (P < 0.01).

FIGURE 5

FIGURE 5

Figure 6 illustrates the hysteresis curve for the same measurement. The force to flex and extend to the 110 degree point was different (hysteresis). For the 2 groups that received heat, hysteresis stayed constant over the 4-day period. But for the control group, there was an increase that peaked on the second day postexercise and was still significantly higher than rest at the last day of measurements (P < 0.01).

FIGURE 6

FIGURE 6

Back to Top | Article Outline

Analytes

The average hematocrit started at 41.8% ± 5.2%. After exercise, the hematocrit increased in the control group to 43.9% ± 6.1%, a significant increase (P < 0.01). This value was 106.0% of the resting data and was equivalent to a reduction in plasma volume of 11.5%, a significant hemoconcentration. When heat was applied just after exercise, there was a 3.9% reduction in hematocrit or, in other words, a shift in water from the cells into the blood by about 6.9%. The reduction in hematocrit with heat at 24 hours was only 2% but still showed significant hemodilution (P < 0.05).

The average corrected myoglobin before exercise was 33.0 ± 4.6 μg/L of blood. The largest increases in myoglobin were in the control and heat 24 groups. These changes in myoglobin (percent above rest in Figure 7) were significantly higher than baseline but not different from each other (P > 0.05). Heat immediately after exercise did allow for a significant difference from the resting data (P > 0.05).

FIGURE 7

FIGURE 7

Back to Top | Article Outline

DISCUSSION

Delayed-onset muscle soreness is a common problem in people who exercise infrequently or even in athletes who exceed their normal workout.38,39 For the last 3 decades, the DOMS phenomenon has gained a considerable amount of interest among researchers and specialists in exercise physiology, sports, and rehabilitation.40 There has been a variety of published studies investigating this painful occurrence regarding its underlying mechanisms, treatment interventions, and preventive strategies.8,11,41–49 However, it is evident from the literature that DOMS is not an easy pathology to quantify, as there is a wide amount of variability between the measurement tools and methods used to quantify this condition.40 It is obvious that no agreement has been made on one best evaluation measure for DOMS, which makes it difficult to verify whether a specific intervention really helps in decreasing the symptoms associated with this type of soreness. Even though needle biopsies of the muscle and blood levels of myofiber proteins might be considered a gold standard to some,40 large variations in some of these blood proteins have been documented,40,50 in addition to the high risks sometimes associated with invasive techniques. Thus, it can be seen that muscle soreness is somewhat ambiguous because many studies depend on measuring soreness using a VAS.44,51–54

Some studies call for cold immediately after exercise,55 whereas some call for heat,56 some diathermy,11 and others modalities such as ultrasound,57 massage,58 or changes in amino acid food intake59 to reduce DOMS. Cold is another possible treatment.60 The NSAIDs and steroids are also common for pain.17

In the present investigation, a standard exercise regimen was followed by all subjects and heat was standardized and applied for 8 hours either immediately after exercise or 24 hours after exercise. Generally, this differs from standard therapeutic modalities such as hydrocolator heat wraps, diathermy, or whirlpool heating, all of which are applied for less than 30 minutes.7 The advantage of ThermaCare heat wraps is that they slowly raise internal tissue temperatures and maintain the temperature for hours.35 This is especially important because if individuals have thick subcutaneous fat, a 20-minute heat modality may not even penetrate the skin and get into fascia and muscle.19,22 This is important because the legs and arms are shell tissues and as such have a temperature well below that of the core.61,62 Heat increases metabolism in tissues.7,63 This should cause healing to occur more quickly.64,65 Heat also increases tissue blood flow.31,66,67 This also should wash away metabolites and allow quicker healing postexercise. Another benefit of heat is that it reduces pain.12,68

Here, the only modality studied was heat. When it was used immediately after exercise, pain was less the next day and the reduction in muscle strength was less than was seen in the control group. Similar findings were seen in a previous study of heat wraps.69 However, this earlier study, although showing similar results, that is, better recovery after exercise with heat than with cold, was limited to self-reported pain and disability, and heat was not used until 18 hours postexercise. In the present investigation, numerous objective and subjective measures of DOMS were made.

The results in the present investigation imply much less muscle damage with heat applied immediately after exercise. It is not clear why heat was not applied immediately after exercise in previous studies. The first objective evidence of less tissue damage is in the continuous passive movement data on the leg. Here, the hysteresis remained constant for 3 days after the exercise if heat was applied immediately after exercise. Hysteresis in the flexion extension curve is a measure of stored elastic energy in the muscle and its tendons.70 Usually it takes more force to flex than extend the leg due to the fact that elastic energy is imparted in the series and parallel elastic components when the knee is flexed.71–74 One published effect of heat is to remove stiffness in muscle and joints.71,74 For the controls, the muscle stiffened in the second and third days after the exercise as shown by the increased force difference from flexion to extension. It is reasonable to assume that this is related to muscle or soft tissue damage in the quadriceps or its tendons. For the control group, it also took more force to move the leg on the second and third days, also implying more tissue damage. This was also seen in the myoglobin data. If heat was used immediately after exercise, myoglobin was unchanged from resting data. But with heat delayed to 24 hours, myoglobin increased to the same level as the controls showing muscle damage.

The subjective data were similar. Algometer data and range of motion data agreed with this premise that heat was helpful in preventing and healing potential damage. The best use of heat was for 8 hours after exercise because soreness was less as was the apparent muscle and tendon damage.

Although most studies recommend cold after heavy exercise,75 here we used heat. The premise is that cold will reduce swelling and therefore reduce tissue damage.75 And yet, despite routine use of cold after exercise, studies show little effect on reducing muscle damage, although most studies have different temperatures for cold and different durations of cold.14 The fact that heat seems to reduce damage if used immediately but not 24 hours later is probably related to the mechanism for DOMS. There are 6 existing theories for the cause of DOMS. These are lactic acid accumulation,76 muscle spasm,77 microtrauma,78 connective tissue damage,79 inflammation, and electrolyte efflux.80 It would be hard to believe that lactic acid accumulation could cause a change in the mechanical properties of muscle (eg, stiffness and strength). The same argument would hold for electrolyte efflux. The fact that the hysteresis curve changes so dramatically would be a strong indicator of traumatic damage to muscle or connective tissue. But if it was to connective tissue, then myoglobin would not increase in plasma because this comes from muscle. Thus, the evidence here supports a muscle damage theory with DOMS.

The fact that heat works well when applied immediately but not 24 hours later would also show that once there is cellular disruption in muscle, damage has occurred and is hard to stop. Although heat helps at 24 hours, this may be due to increased healing rates from higher temperatures of tissue. The fact that the results were less for the same commercial heat wrap in the Mayer study12 is probably due to the fact that they waited 18 hours postexercise to apply the heat wrap.

There were some limitations to the study. First, measures of damage were only made every 24 hours and only for 3 days. Subjects were also young and somewhat fit. Data may be different on fitter subjects such as elite athletes and older subjects or subjects with diabetes where blood flow is not increased as much with heat in tissue,65,75,81,82 and further investigation is needed. Here, there was no difference in the response of men and women studied here. But these were young women, and the effect of estrogen and the birth control pill on motor control and movement are pronounced,55,71–73 and further investigation is needed. From these data, continuous low-level heat packs just after exercise seems to be a good recommendation for the practitioner. Heat before exercise has been poorly studied, but it also seems to reduce muscle damage and injury. Unlike active warm-up, passive warm-up involves heat or heat-producing sources such as infrared or ultrasound. The idea is that the benefits of active warm-up can be achieved by passive heat. Heat increases circulation8,22,66,83 and tissue flexibility71 and increases metabolism. In one study, when examining the effect of warm-up on muscle strength, for strength, passive warm-up was just as effective as active warm-up to increase strength.84 For swimming, performance was increased with either an active or a passive warm-up by similar amounts.84 Jumping performance also increased with either an active or a passive warm-up. The evidence on passive warm-up using heat to increase performance and prevent injury is weak.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Kauranen K, Siira P, Vanharanta H. Delayed-onset muscle soreness and motor performance of the upper extremity. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2001;84:302–309.
2. Calbet JA, Chavarren J, Dorado C. Running economy and delayed onset muscle soreness. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2001;41:18–26.
3. George SZ, Dover GC, Fillingim RB. Fear of pain influences outcomes after exercise-induced delayed onset muscle soreness at the shoulder. Clin J Pain. 2007;23:76–84.
4. Hubal MJ, Chen TC, Thompson PD, et al Inflammatory gene changes associated with the repeated-bout effect. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2008;294:R1628–R1637.
5. Higbie EJ, Cureton KJ, Warren GL III, et al Effects of concentric and eccentric training on muscle strength, cross-sectional area, and neural activation. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1996;81:2173–2181.
6. Evans WJ. Exercise, nutrition and aging. J Nutr. 1992;122(suppl 3):796–801.
7. Al-Nakhli HH, Petrofsky JS, Laymon MS, et al The use of thermal infra-red imaging to detect delayed onset muscle soreness. J Vis Exp. 2012;22:3551–3557.
8. Petrofsky J, Batt J, Bollinger JN, et al Comparison of different heat modalities for treating delayed-onset muscle soreness in people with diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011;13:645–655.
9. Al-Nakhli HH, Petrofsky JS, Laymon MS, et al The use of thermal infrared imaging to assess the efficacy of a therapeutic exercise program in individuals with diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012;14:159–167.
10. Bloomer RJ. The role of nutritional supplements in the prevention and treatment of resistance exercise-induced skeletal muscle injury. Sports Med. 2007;37:519–532.
11. Cheung K, Hume P, Maxwell L. Delayed onset muscle soreness: treatment strategies and performance factors. Sports Med. 2003;33:145–164.
12. Mayer JM, Mooney V, Matheson LN, et al Continuous low-level heat wrap therapy for the prevention and early phase treatment of delayed-onset muscle soreness of the low back: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:1310–1317.
13. Aminian-Far A, Hadian MR, Olyaei G, et al Whole-body vibration and the prevention and treatment of delayed-onset muscle soreness. J Athl Train. 2011;46:43–49.
14. Howatson G, Goodall S, van Someren KA. The influence of cold water immersions on adaptation following a single bout of damaging exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2009;105:615–621.
15. Yamane M, Teruya H, Nakano M, et al Post-exercise leg and forearm flexor muscle cooling in humans attenuates endurance and resistance training effects on muscle performance and on circulatory adaptation. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006;96:572–580.
16. Kinkade S. Evaluation and treatment of acute low back pain. Am Fam Physician. 2007;75:1181–1188.
17. French SD, Cameron M, Walker BF, et al Cochrane review of superficial heat or cold for low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31:998–1006.
18. French SD, Cameron M, Walker BF, et al Superficial heat or cold for low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006:CD004750.
19. Petrofsky JS, Laymon M. Heat transfer to deep tissue: the effect of body fat and heating modality. J Med Eng Technol. 2009;33:337–348.
20. Nadler SF, Weingand K, Kruse RJ. The physiologic basis and clinical applications of cryotherapy and thermotherapy for the pain practitioner. Pain Physician. 2004;7:395–399.
21. Edwards RH, Harris RC, Hultman E, et al Effect of temperature on muscle energy metabolism and endurance during successive isometric contractions, sustained to fatigue, of the quadriceps muscle in man. J Physiol. 1972;220:335–352.
22. Petrofsky J, Bains G, Prowse M, et al Dry heat, moist heat and body fat: are heating modalities really effective in people who are overweight? J Med Eng Technol. 2009;33:361–369.
23. Petrofsky J, Lohman E III, Lee S, et al Effects of contrast baths on skin blood flow on the dorsal and plantar foot in people with type 2 diabetes and age-matched controls. Physiother Theory Pract. 2007;23:189–197.
24. Farage MA, Miller KW, Maibach HI, eds. Textbook of Aging Skin. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2010.
25. Stanchev D, Blosa M, Milius D, et al Cross-inhibition between native and recombinant TRPV1 and P2X(3) receptors. Pain. 2009;143:26–36.
26. Bele T, Fabbretti E. P2X receptors, sensory neurons and pain. Curr Med Chem. 2015;22:845–850.
27. Puchalowicz K, Tarnowski M, Baranowska-Bosiacka I, et al P2X and P2Y receptors-role in the pathophysiology of the nervous system. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15:23672–23704.
28. Brederson JD, Kym PR, Szallasi A. Targeting TRP channels for pain relief. Eur J Pharmacol. 2013;716:61–76.
29. Suh H, Petrofsky JS, Lo T, et al The combined effect of a three-channel electrode delivery system with local heat on the healing of chronic wounds. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009;11:681–688.
30. Suh H, Petrofsky J, Fish A, et al A new electrode design to improve outcomes in the treatment of chronic non-healing wounds in diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009;11:315–322.
31. Petrofsky JS, Lawson D, Suh HJ, et al The influence of local versus global heat on the healing of chronic wounds in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2007;9:535–544.
32. Lawson D, Petrofsky JS. A randomized control study on the effect of biphasic electrical stimulation in a warm room on skin blood flow and healing rates in chronic wounds of patients with and without diabetes. Med Sci Monit. 2007;13:CR258–CR263.
33. Petrofsky J, Alshahmmari F, Yim JE, et al The interrealtionship between locally applied heat, ageing and skin blood flow on heat transfer into and from the skin. J Med Eng Technol. 2011;35:262–274.
34. Stark J, Petrofsky J, Berk L, et al Continuous low-level heatwrap therapy relieves low back pain and reduces muscle stiffness. Phys Sportsmed. 2014;42:39–48.
35. Malanga GA, Yan N, Stark J. Mechanisms and efficacy of heat and cold therapies for musculoskeletal injury. Postgrad Med. 2015;127:57–65.
36. Southerst D, Cote P, Stupar M, et al The reliability of body pain diagrams in the quantitative measurement of pain distribution and location in patients with musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2013;36:30–47.
37. van Beaumont W, Strand JC, Petrofsky JS, et al Changes in total plasma content of electrolytes and proteins with maximal exercise. J Appl Physiol. 1973;34:102–106.
38. Cheung WW, Mak RH. Melanocortin antagonism ameliorates muscle wasting and inflammation in chronic kidney disease. Am J Physiol Ren Physiol. 2012;303:F1315–F1324.
39. Mak RH, Cheung WW. MicroRNAs: a new therapeutic frontier for muscle wasting in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2012;82:373–374.
40. Warren GL, Lowe DA, Armstrong RB. Measurement tools used in the study of eccentric contraction-induced injury. Sports Med. 1999;27:43–59.
41. Hilbert JE, Sforzo GA, Swensen T. The effects of massage on delayed onset muscle soreness. Br J Sports Med. 2003;37:72–75.
42. Symons TB, Clasey JL, Gater DR, et al Effects of deep heat as a preventative mechanism on delayed onset muscle soreness. J Strength Cond Res. 2004;18:155–161.
43. Vaile JM, Gill ND, Blazevich AJ. The effect of contrast water therapy on symptoms of delayed onset muscle soreness. J Strength Cond Res. 2007;21:697–702.
44. Stone MB, Merrick MA, Ingersoll CD, et al Preliminary comparison of bromelain and ibuprofen for delayed onset muscle soreness management. Clin J Sports Med. 2002;12:373–378.
45. Barlas P, Craig JA, Robinson J, et al Managing delayed-onset muscle soreness: lack of effect of selected oral systemic analgesics. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:966–972.
46. Howatson G, Someren KAV. The prevention and treatment of exercise-induced muscle damage. Sports Med. 2008;38:483–503.
47. MacIntyre DL, Reid WD, McKenzie DC. Delayed muscle soreness: the inflammatory response to muscle injury and its clinical implications. Sports Med. 1995;20:24–40.
48. Armstrong RB. Mechanisms of exercise-induced delayed onset muscular soreness: a brief review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1984;16:529–538.
49. Jackman SR, Witard OC, Jeukendrup AE, et al Branched-chain amino acid ingestion can ameliorate soreness from eccentric exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42:962–970.
50. Clarkson PM, Ebbeling C. Investigation of serum creatine kinase variability after muscle-damaging exercise. Clin Sci (Lond). 1988;75:257–261.
51. Vaile J, Halson S, Gill N, et al Effect of hydrotherapy on the signs and symptoms of delayed onset muscle soreness. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007;102:447–455.
52. Vinck E, Cagnie B, Coorevits P, et al Pain reduction by infrared light-emitting diode irradiation: a pilot study on experimentally induced delayed-onset muscle soreness in humans. Lasers Med Sci. 2006;21:11–18.
53. Barlas P, Robinson J, Allen J, et al Lack of effect of acupuncture upon signs and symptoms of delayed onset muscle soreness. Clin Physiol. 2000;20:449–456.
54. Frey Law LA, Evans S, Knudtson J, et al Massage reduces pain perception and hyperalgesia in experimental muscle pain: a randomized, controlled trial. J Pain. 2008;9:714–721.
55. Veilleux LN, Cheung M, Ben Amor M, et al Abnormalities in muscle density and muscle function in hypophosphatemic rickets. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:E1492–E1498.
56. Pedroso FE, Spalding PB, Cheung MC, et al Inflammation, organomegaly, and muscle wasting despite hyperphagia in a mouse model of burn cachexia. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2012;3:199–211.
57. Boutet SC, Cheung TH, Quach NL, et al Alternative polyadenylation mediates microRNA regulation of muscle stem cell function. Cell Stem Cell. 2012;10:327–336.
58. Cheung EV, Tidball JG. Administration of the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug ibuprofen increases macrophage concentrations but reduces necrosis during modified muscle use. Inflamm Res. 2003;52:170–176.
59. Cheung YL, Molassiotis A, Chang AM. The effect of progressive muscle relaxation training on anxiety and quality of life after stoma surgery in colorectal cancer patients. Psychooncology. 2003;12:254–266.
60. Wang F, Song ZY, Tao XF, et al The effect of freezing and low molecular weight heparin treatment on the production of hepatocyte growth factor of human RPE cells [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2005;41:106–109.
61. Rowell LB. Cardiovascular aspects of human thermoregulation. Circ Res. 1983;52:367–379.
62. Hammel HT. Regulation of internal body temperature. Annu Rev Physiol. 1968;30:641–710.
63. Simson LR. Effects of temperature on biological systems. Med Bull (Ann Arbor). 1965;31:33–38.
64. Hui T, Petrofsky J. The detection of injury and inflammation by the application of microcurrent through the skin. Phys Ther Rehab Sci. 2013;1–11.
65. Mayer S, Izydorczyk I, Reeh PW, et al Bradykinin-induced nociceptor sensitisation to heat depends on cox-1 and cox-2 in isolated rat skin. Pain. 2007;130:14–24.
66. Petrofsky J, Bains G, Prowse M, et al Does skin moisture influence the blood flow response to local heat? A re-evaluation of the Pennes model. J Med Eng Technol. 2009;33:532–537.
67. Petrofsky JS, Bains G, Raju C, et al The effect of the moisture content of a local heat source on the blood flow response of the skin. Arch Dermatol Res. 2009;301:581–585.
68. Malmberg AB, Bley KR. Turning up the Heat on Pain: TRPV1 Receptors in Pain and Inflammation. Boston: Birkhauser Verlag; 2005.
69. Nadler SF, Malanga GA, Bartoli LA, et al Hip muscle imbalance and low back pain in athletes: influence of core strengthening. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34:9–16.
70. Bleakley CM, Davison GW. What is the biochemical and physiological rationale for using cold-water immersion in sports recovery? A systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2010;44:179–187.
71. Lee H, Petrofsky JS, Daher N, et al Differences in anterior cruciate ligament elasticity and force for knee flexion in women: oral contraceptive users versus non-oral contraceptive users. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2014;114:285–294.
72. Khowailed IA, Petrofsky J, Lohman E, et al 17beta-Estradiol induced effects on anterior cruciate ligament laxness and neuromuscular activation patterns in female runners. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015;24:670–680.
73. Khowailed IA, Petrofsky J, Lohman E, et al Six weeks habituation of simulated barefoot running induces neuromuscular adaptations and changes in foot strike patterns in female runners. Med Sci Monit. 2015;21:2021–2030.
74. Laymon M, Petrofsky J, McKivigan J, et al Effect of heat, cold, and pressure on the transverse carpal ligament and median nerve: a pilot study. Med Sci Monit. 2015;21:446–451.
75. Fleetwood-Walker SM, Proudfoot CW, Garry EM, et al Cold comfort pharm. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2007;28:621–628.
76. Armstrong RB, Phelps RO. Muscle fiber type composition of the rat hindlimb. Am J Anat. 1984;171:259–272.
77. De Vries HA. Quantitative electromyographic investigation of the spasm theory of muscle pain. Am J Phys Med. 1966;45:119–134.
78. Bobbert MF, Hollander AP, Huijing PA. Factors in delayed onset muscular soreness of man. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1986;18:75–81.
79. MacIntyre DL, Reid WD, Lyster DM, et al Different effects of strenuous eccentric exercise on the accumulation of neutrophils in muscle in women and men. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000;81:47–53.
80. Gulick DT, Kimura IF, Sitler M, et al Various treatment techniques on signs and symptoms of delayed onset muscle soreness. J Athl Train. 1996;31:145–152.
81. Kan CC, Lee PF, Wen TH, et al Two clustering diffusion patterns identified from the 2001-2003 dengue epidemic, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008;79:344–352.
82. Petrofsky J, Paluso D, Anderson D, et al The contribution of skin blood flow in warming the skin after the application of local heat; the duality of the Pennes heat equation. Med Eng Phys. 2011;33:325–329.
83. Petrofsky J, Gunda S, Raju C, et al Impact of hydrotherapy on skin blood flow: how much is due to moisture and how much is due to heat? Physiother Theory Pract. 2010;26:107–112.
84. Sedgwick AW, Whalen HR. Effect of passive warm-up on muscular strength and endurance. Res Q. 1964;35:45–59.
Keywords:

heat; exercise; muscle; soreness

Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.