Ice hockey, a game with inherent risks of injury, is played in North America and Europe at high speeds, on hard ice, with boards, sticks, and pucks.1 Ice hockey, played primarily in regions frozen for over 6 months of the year, can also bring joy when played in a fun, respectful, yet competitive manner. Collisions, body checking, and illegal on-ice activity result in potentially serious consequences including sport-related concussions (SRC)/mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI).2–5 These proceedings disseminate information presented at Ice Hockey Summit II: Action on Concussion in context with accomplishments made since Summit I, 2010. Action items from the 5 sectors identified for Summit II, 2013, were voted on and prioritized in 5 areas: (1) Basic Science of Concussions in Ice Hockey: Taking Science Forward; (2) Acute and Chronic Concussion Care—Lets Make a Difference; (3) Preventing Concussions (Behaviors, Rules, Education and Epidemiology): Measuring Effectiveness; (4) Updates in Novel Equipment (Helmets, Chin Straps, Mouthguards): Their Relationship to ASTM, ISO, and BNQ Standards; and (5) Policies and Plans for Organizations: State, National and Federal Levels. The evidence-informed support for each of the sectors is discussed from the perspective of published literature, action accomplished since 2010 and compelling new science.6,7 To update Summit II attendees, the status of action items prioritized during Summit I were briefly summarized and reported in the following paragraphs.
Databases and Metrics
Little progress occurred since Summit I in: certifying health care professionals who have SRC expertise, or in establishing stringent concussion metrics, data bases, or a national concussion registry.7–10 All states have accepted a version of the Lystedt Law, which dictates that return to play (RTP) is the job of a licensed health care provider; however, there is no centralized registry to document concussion information. Injury reporting surveillance programs through the NCAA, the National Athletic Treatment, Injury and Outcomes Network (NATION), and the Reporting Information Online system (RIO) collect epidemiological injury and concussion data across multiple sports, at collegiate and high school levels. However, these databases are not hockey specific, they lack a consistent concussion definition, and data collected are not concussion specific. In the absence of a national injury registry, these resources allow us to better measure SRC across sports and age groups using more standard methods so that trends over time can be detected.11
Recognition, Diagnosis, Management, and Return to Play
Criteria for recognition, diagnosis, and RTP of athletes with SRC are evolving. Sport-related concussion is accepted as a brain injury that in 80% to 85% of athletes resolves within 10 days.6,7 Traditional neuroimaging, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is usually normal. Advanced imaging, such as functional MRI (fMRI) or diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), may identify SRC in research studies, but these techniques are not generally suitable for direct clinical use.12 “No same day RTP” and RTP, only after symptom resolution, are clearly now responsibilities of licensed health care professionals.13
Player Equipment and Facilities
Hockey helmet standards and designs have not changed since Summit I. Helmets effectively mitigate impact energy but do not prevent SRC, and no scientific evidence confirms the preventive effect of mouth guards in reducing SRC. Helmet testing standards are based on biomechanical thresholds for skull fracture and severe TBI—not concussion (mTBI). Tolerance limits for SRC have been proposed, and sensors detecting head acceleration are studied in relation to symptom onset and concussion diagnosis.14,15 Debate continues within standards organizations about how acceleration tolerances can be implemented in helmet testing, and if SRC risk can be reduced by helmet design. Hockey helmets and mouth guards are worn in a manner noncompliant with manufacturers' instructions, thereby impeding the in vivo assessment of helmet effectiveness.16,17
Education and Prevention
Hockey requires behavior modification to reduce SRC. Fair Play (FP), a component of the Minnesota Hockey Education Program, was implemented 10 years ago, a result of collaboration with Mayo Clinic. Game score sheets, analyzed annually by Mayo Clinic Sports Medicine, track major infractions, such as head hits and checking from behind (CFB). Tougher sanctions are imposed as needed to influence these behaviors. “Heads Up, Don't Duck,” Play It Cool (PIC) coaching education, ThinkFirst Smart Hockey, and Concussions and Female Athletes: The Untold Story, viewed over 2500 times, increase SRC awareness.18–21 Education of coaches, parents, and players in conjunction with a behavioral modification program has the potential to help decrease SRC in hockey.22
Rule Changes, Policies, and Enforcement
Pee Wee hockey leagues (age: 11-12 years) that allow body checking increase the risk of SRC 3-fold compared with leagues without body checking.23 USA Hockey championed a rule change in 2011 that prohibited body checking in Pee Wee games but allowed checking skills to be taught during practices. The rationale to delay checking in games until Bantam (age: 13-14 years) hockey was based on studies that document a decreased risk of concussion,23,24 and the premise that skill development may progress faster without checking. Furthermore, evidence supports more positive game outcomes based on win–loss–tie record in teams with fewer injuries through the season25 and a significant reduction in health care utilization costs in leagues where body checking is not allowed.26 A body-checking discussion meeting in 201427 included a task force of researchers and community partners from Canada and the United States. The deliberations led to an evidence-informed decision to delay body checking until age 13 (Bantam).24,25,27,28 MN data showed fewer checks from behind and head hits in the United States, after the rule change. Data based on the rule change regarding SRC incidence, economics, player attrition, and skill development in hockey will be available in the future.
Seven journal editors simultaneously published the post-Summit I Proceedings and television news casts disseminated our concerns about the need for a rule change. Increasing awareness helped obtain an affirmative vote. Other media-based communications occurred before, during, and after Summit I. Jeff Klein, New York Times, wrote extensively,29,30 Ken Dryden published on the Summit and concussion, and other newspapers carried Summit-related SRC articles.
SUMMIT II: ACTION ON CONCUSSION
In the United States, >300 000 SRC occur annually across all sports at all levels of competition.12,31–33 Ice hockey SRC prevalence is high and reducing SRC requires the collaboration of medicine, epidemiology, psychology, sport science, coaching, engineering, officiating, manufacturing, and our community partners. Hockey players compete at high speeds as they mature, risking injury from intentional and accidental collisions, body checks, illegal on-ice activity, and fighting. These behaviors may result in SRC, possibly accompanied by brain microstructure alterations and occasionally a catastrophic brain or spinal injury.5,34–36 The following case study of a hockey player relates to the concussion science that was presented during Summit II.
Concussion in a Professional Hockey Player
J.M., aged 27 years, with 2 prior concussions, sustained a blow to the head with no loss of consciousness but fell skating off ice. CT and MRI were negative, but exercise exacerbated his SRC symptoms. Four months later, after a gradual rehabilitation, he returned to hockey. After 5 games, an elbow to his chin resulted in J.M.'s head striking the glass. Cognitive and physical rest, chiropractic manipulation, and massage provided temporary relief, but headache, fatigue, irritability, anxiety, dizziness, and forgetfulness remained. Depression and anxiety symptoms were abnormally high, despite normal neuropsychological examinations. His activity progressed as his symptoms resolved. After returning to the National Hockey League (NHL), he was checked head first into the glass and despite dizziness, finished the game. After weeks of rest, his postconcussion symptom score was 72, due to blurry vision, headache, anxiety, irritability, sleep disturbance, and fogginess. His multidisciplinary concussion care team used advanced imaging, physical and chiropractic therapy, vestibular rehabilitation, pharmacology, cognitive, and behavioral rehabilitation, and psychiatric interventions. His anxiety and depression did not resolve and prompted a recommendation that he retire from prohockey. He then faced the challenges of transitioning from a professional hockey career and coping with loss of exercise, travel, prestige, excitement, quality sleep, and teammate camaraderie.
Before discussing the science of concussion in depth, the idea that all SRC cannot be prevented was reiterated. Sport-related concussion reduction in a collision sport must address modifiable extrinsic and intrinsic risk factors. Prevention protocols should include a strict definition of SRC with valid markers of severity based on prospective studies with sufficient power in specified populations, which incorporate individual exposure time (IET).6–10,14,37–42 Evaluations should be provided by qualified health care providers at point of care.9 Learning the mechanism of head trauma (eg, video review) and using a multivariate analysis to adjust for covariates and control for clustering are also important.43
Section 1: Basic Science of Concussions in Ice Hockey: Taking Science Forward
High school, collegiate, and Junior A hockey teams (n = 11) wore instrumented (HITS) helmets between 2006 and 2013 and >100 000 head impacts were recorded. Male and female players experienced 2.9 ± 1.2 and 1.7 ± 0.7 head impacts, respectively, per practice or game to the front (30%) and back (33%).44–49 Player-to-player contact accounted for 50% of head impacts in both male and female leagues, followed by contact with boards and ice; males sustained higher linear and angular accelerations. The largest accelerations resulted from head contact with the ice. Head impact exposure—frequency, magnitude, and head impact location—correlated with signs, symptoms, and neuroimaging (fMRI with DTI) of diagnosed concussions in high school, collegiate, and prohockey and football players. Head impact exposure differed significantly for immediate versus delayed presentations of SRC.50,51 More SRC in hockey were diagnosed on days with higher numbers of impacts and greater impact magnitudes than on days with fewer impacts and lower magnitudes.
An in-depth investigation of Junior A players measured SRC history, SRC diagnosed in season, HITS accelerations, IET, penalties, video data, and on-ice behavior predisposing to concussion. HITS recorded 5201 impacts over 10 g in 2011 to 12 and 2780 impacts in 2012 to 13. Impact frequency, between 102.9 and 185.8 per player per season, averaged 7.06 impacts per game in season 1 and 6.82 in season 2. Eight SRC were diagnosed in 2011 to 12, and 4 in 2012 to 2013. In season 1, 34 fighting penalties were called and 49 in season 2. Video analysis of behavior conducive to SRC included skating with the head down, negative body position (ie, no anticipation or body awareness), and fighting.52 This research provided accelerations and footage for video reconstruction input for finite element modeling (FEM)53 to determine strain and strain rate inputs for stretching in a rat neuron model.
Video reconstruction determines the relationship between head impacts and hockey SRC, manifested by the dynamic response and brain tissue deformation calculations. A validated FEM of the skull and brain is used to obtain objective data.36 Sport-related concussion impact videos reconstructed at the Neurotrauma Impact Science Laboratory (NISL), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, were obtained through collaboration with coinvestigators, or through an Internet search. Impacts with multiple lines and circles visible in a wide camera view, a close-up of impact location, head contact from a striking player, using a shoulder or elbow, and a victim who did not strike his head again are eligible for use. Impact velocity requires establishing the distance separating a striking player's elbow or shoulder and the struck player's head 5 frames before impact.34,35,54–56 The lines and circles provide a scale reference to convert pixels to meters (±5% accuracy) and a reference grid determines impact location.57,58 This system creates rectangular targets more precisely than previous reconstructions. Impact direction uses increments of 30°. Variation of 30° for a side impact matters little when recreating a shoulder to helmeted-head hit in hockey. This method replicated a previous study of skilled players striking a Hybrid III head form using 4 techniques identified from hockey videos. Shoulder impacts used a high mass, high compliance surrogate, whereas elbow impacts used a low mass, low compliance surrogate. Both surrogates generated similar linear acceleration, peak curve length, and brain deformation as those generated by players. Recent data from NISL showed that a punch in hockey generates a greater magnitude of angular acceleration than collisions with the ice, a shoulder, or the puck, supporting the need for rules to curtail fighting in hockey.59 Understanding macrotrauma prompts the question of how the brain responds at a cellular level.
An in vivo postconcussion rodent model was used to study concussion, repeat concussion, and postconcussion cognitive impairment and intervention effect on behavior. Mild traumatic brain injury in rodents is induced by fluid percussion, weight drop, and closed head injury. Experimental mTBI induces a neurometabolic cascade that includes ionic flux, indiscriminate glutamate release, energy crisis/mitochondrial dysfunction, axonal injury, and alterations in neurotransmission.60–63 Behaviors studied post-TBI–included working memory, spatial learning and memory (SL&M), fear-based learning, motor coordination, and depression. Working memory (retaining short-term information for manipulation), disturbed post-mTBI, was measured in rats using a novel object recognition (NOR) test. Impaired NOR recovered 7 to 10 days post-mTBI. Working memory was worse after repeat mTBI than after a single mTBI. Spatial learning and memory tested using the Morris Water Maze (MWM), showed mTBI-disturbed MWM learning in juvenile rats, and SL&M deficits worsened after repeat mTBI.64 Mild traumatic brain injury combined with a fearful stimulus enhanced fear response, which may persist, as in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).65 Animal models enable timing control of post-mTBI insults to identify a vulnerability window for repeat mTBI or exercise. Post-mTBI energy crisis persists 3 to 14 days and was injury model dependent. Repeated mTBI during an energy crisis period causes more severe prolonged metabolic and memory impairments.66 Early post-mTBI exercise interferes with nerve growth factors and cognitive recovery, but after the acute phase, exercise facilitates recovery.67
Before treating SRC in vivo, cellular pathways leading to clinical complications must be understood. Head acceleration and brain deformation during collisions correlate with SRC. Hypotheses for how mechanical forces translate to cellular neural dysfunction include strain-induced membrane poration, ion channel dysfunction, and integrin stimulation-induced Rho-ROCK signaling.68,69 In these SRC studies, whole-body macroscopic forces sensed at a cellular level are pathologically transduced. No 1 pathway has been identified and each mechanism may play a role. The SRC mechanism may depend on mechanical load on the brain cells. To determine SRC mechanisms, in vitro experimental models must be developed with physiological structure and function, as connecting collision forces to neuronal injury is difficult and costly using in vivo animal models. Microfabricated biological systems have advanced to organ-on-a-chip technology so in vivo function can be reproduced in microscale in vitro systems and used to study biological mechanisms or used as high-throughput pharmaceutical test-beds.70–74 This technology permits probing all stresses and strains to which neurons are exposed in SRC to determine the level at which brain deformation causes dysfunction. There are only been a few neurotrauma organ-on-a-chip studies, but the basic science of SRC will advance rapidly as brain-on-a-chip technology evolves. References are in the following.
Section 2: Acute and Chronic Concussion Care: Emphasizing Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Concussion Consequences
Medical Diagnosis of Sport-Related Concussion
A neurologist describing the science of SRC acknowledged that cell ion channel dysfunction and awareness of potential pharmacology intervention sites in SRC have evolved. Increased extracellular potassium and glutamate, activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, neuron depolarization, and glial activation depicting the postconcussion neurometabolic cascade (NMC) may result in cortical spreading depression (CSD). After SRC, CSD leads to an inflammatory cascade from neuronal Pannexin 1 (Panx1) mega-channel opening, caspase-1 activation, release of high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) from neurons, nuclear factor kB (NFkB) activation in astrocytes, and release of prostanoids and cytokines, such as IL-1β and TNF-α.75 This cascade may be disrupted by inhibitors of Panx1 channels (eg, probenecid), NFkB (eg, aspirin, feverfew), or inhibition of prostanoids (NSAIDS). The post-SRC NMC and upregulation of aquaporin (water channel) proteins in astrocyte plasma membranes are partially responsible for brain edema post-SRC. Intranasal nerve growth factor, given after mTBI, reduced brain edema in an animal model by inhibiting the transcription and expression of L-1b, TNF-α, NFkB, and aquaporin channel expression.76 Sport-related concussion and CSD are associated with intercellular calcium (Ca++) waves that spread through astrocyte networks. Ca++ wave propagation post-SRC is mediated in part by purinergic receptors. Antagonism of purinergic receptors reduces neuron death and improved histological and cognitive outcomes in a TBI animal model. Although most mTBI interventions involve animals, a recent double-blind placebo controlled clinical trial in concussed war fighters evaluated N-acetyl cysteine (NAC), an agent with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties.77 War fighters given NAC within 24 hours of bTBI had fewer symptoms compared with those receiving placebo, demonstrating effective short-term treatment for bTBI. This work was subsequently replicated in rodents.78 The benefit of early intervention impeded the post-bTBI NMC; however, larger confirmatory studies are mandatory post-SRC.
Imaging Sport-Related Concussion (mTBI)
Although CT neuroimaging for acute, moderate, and severe neurologic trauma demonstrates hemorrhagic intracranial lesions, changes from mTBI injury are rarely apparent. Occasionally, T2 and T2* MRI detects lesions not seen on CT imaging. Functional magnetic resonance demonstrates disruption of neuronal network activity post-mTBI.79 Increased functional activity after head trauma shows a higher level of brain activation is required to perform memory tasks compared with controls.80 Specific brain biomarkers detected with advanced MRI techniques and fMRI with DTI can elucidate the intracellular impact of mTBI.81–83 Magnetic resonance spectroscopy offers a quantitative measurement of brain injury. N-acetylaspartic acid (NAA) decreases in the presence of trauma, and NAA/creatine ratios have been proposed to measure mTBI severity and monitor recovery.84
Neuropsychological Testing in Sport-Related Concussion
Division 1 football and hockey players wore HITS helmets (n = 214) to assess the effect of a season of head impact on cognitive performance, compared with a noncontact athlete control group (n = 45). Using ImPACT85 and 7 measures from a neuropsychological (NP) test on contact (n = 55) and noncontact athletes (n = 45), few cognitive differences were detected preseason or postseason assessments. More contact athletes performed poorer than predicted postseason on new learning (CVLT) compared with noncontact athletes (24% vs 3.6%; P < 0.006), suggesting repetitive head impacts may impede learning. Although contact athletes, veterans of several seasons, tested once showed no impaired cognitive function, 8% to 12% of veteran hockey players scored >1.5 SDs below baseline on several NP tests. Players (n = 11) who sustained SRC during the season were tested 1 to 3 days post-SRC showed a loss of practice effect, performance declines, and increased symptoms compared with nonconcussed and noncontact athletes. The concussion symptom profile was statistically significant in this small sample. On the Stroop Interference test, 50% of concussed players scored >1.5 SD lower than predicted, based on preseason performance. Data suggest immediate SRC effects on cognition, but no lasting cognitive effects in players with repetitive, subconcussive head trauma during 1 season.46
Return to Play Conditioning Treatment for Sport-Related Concussion
Evaluation and treatment must be based on SRC physiology. Exercise testing to the level required in sport, post-SRC without symptom exacerbation defines recovery.12 The Buffalo Concussion Treadmill Test (BCTT), based on the Balke cardiac treadmill protocol, diagnoses SRC physiological dysfunction, differentiates it from a diagnosis of cervical injury, quantifies severity, and determines exercise capacity.86–91 When SRC athletes achieve maximum exertion and are at a baseline or normative level of symptoms, they are physiologically ready to begin the monitored Zurich RTP protocol. Sport-related concussion athletes who demonstrate a submaximal symptom-limited threshold on the BCTT have not recovered. For athletes not recovered, aerobic exercise (AE) at a subthreshold target heart rate (HR), which is 80% to 90% of the HR achieved on the BCTT, 20 minutes per day, accelerates a safe recovery.88,91 Athletes are instructed to exercise aerobically at target HR using an HR monitor to stay below symptom threshold. Target HR can be increased by 5 to 10 bpm every 1 to 2 weeks, depending on individual recovery rate. Athletes are physiologically recovered when they can exercise at their usual perceived exertion for competition for 20 minutes without symptom exacerbation. Sport-related concussion athletes may have visual or vestibular signs and symptoms that do not resolve with progressive AE that require treatment. Nevertheless, they should continue AE to improve mood and fitness. A recent study showed that the BCTT helped establish physiological recovery in accordance with the Zurich RTP guidelines and was 100% successful at returning SRC adolescent athletes to sport.92 Provocative exercise testing is consistent with expert consensus opinion on establishing physiological recovery from SRC.12
Persistent Postconcussion Cervical/Vestibular Concerns
Dizziness, neck pain, and headaches are SRC symptoms frequently reported in hockey players,9 including youth.93 There is a paucity of the literature evaluating treatment in individuals with persistent symptoms post-SRC.94 Reportedly, the cervical spine is a source of cervicogenic headaches and posttraumatic cervical spine pain.95 Dizziness after trauma has been attributed to vestibular and cervical dysfunction.96 Persistent dizziness, neck pain, and headaches, attributed to cervical spine and vestibular system involvement, may be amenable to cervical spine and balance treatments. Functional and symptomatic improvements in individuals with persistent dizziness post-SRC have been observed after a course of vestibular rehabilitation.97 Combined manual therapy and exercise for the cervical spine is a widely accepted treatment for individuals with cervical spine pain and cervicogenic headaches.98,99 Recent evidence has demonstrated significant treatment effects in individuals with persistent symptoms of dizziness, neck pain, and headaches after SRC who were treated with a combination of cervical and vestibular physiotherapy techniques.100
Concussions in Females, Youth, and Players With Emotional and Behavioral Disorders
Studies of SRC in hockey may neglect populations, such as females, youth players, and those with emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD).19,101–105 Although females have lower rates and frequencies of SRC than males when collapsed across sports and ages, SRC in college hockey is higher for females, but there is greater severity in males. Sport-related concussion is the most common hockey injury for both genders, but genders report symptoms differently, perhaps due to differences in sensitivity, physiological parameters, and reporting styles.103 Sport-related concussion risk in youth players is unknown. Although SRC rates are lower in high school than college, SRC incidence is higher in youth players. Sport-related concussion in hockey may be more frequent among youth than adult players. Cognitive impairment in youth lasts longer than in adult athletes and extended RTP protocols may be required compared with players older than 18 years. Second-impact syndrome, or diffuse cerebral swelling after mTBI, occurs most often in youth.104 Pre-existing EBD (eg, depression and anxiety) influence post-SRC adjustment and recovery post-SRC symptoms mimic and exacerbate pre-existing depression and anxiety, thus influencing postconcussion syndrome. Premorbid attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) exacerbates post-SRC symptoms. Adjustment difficulties, irritability, aggression, and trouble concentrating are inherent in ADHD and are also characteristic of post-SRC.101
Genetic and Epigenetic Implications for Sport-Related Concussion
The genome, epigenome, structure, and brain function are being studied using neuroimaging and neuropsychometric measures to determine whether specific athletes are at risk for SRC. Genetic and epigenetics (environmental influences) affect human traits. Investigators can determine whether (1) genes contribute to a trait and (2) whether environmental factors (ie, adversity and trauma) modify traits: a “gene by environment” approach. Of 1676 adolescent twins, 13.3% reported mTBI. Concussion was NOT genetically influenced, but attention problems (P < 0.005), aggressive behavior (P < 0.05), somatic complaints (P < 0.005), and thought problems (P < 0.01) were influential.106 APOE, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, and Tau are associated with mTBI risk or prolonged recovery.107,108 Brain-derived neurotrophic factor influences cell growth, differentiation, and neuronal survival. Certain tau genotypes have been associated with self-reported concussions.109 Tau proteins belong to the microtubule-associated protein family. Microtubule components of axons influence cell shape and protein, hormone, enzyme, and neurotransmitter transport along axons.110 Sport-related concussion studies should include genetic, epigenetic, neuroimaging, and phenotype collected at baseline, post-SRC, and postseason.
A Pathophysiologic View of Head Trauma Effects
Chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), a progressive neurodegenerative disease, has been associated with repetitive TBI in collision sports and warfighters111–114; however, association is not causation. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy is manifested by symptoms that occur after latency periods of years to decades. The insidious onset of irritability, impulsivity, aggression, depression, suicidality, and short-term memory loss progresses to include cognitive deficits and dementia. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy, characterized by hyperphosphorylated tau protein in neurons and astrocytes, is in a pattern distinct from other tauopathies, including Alzheimer disease. Hyperphosphorylated tau starts as perivascular neurofibrillary tangles and neurites deep in cerebral sulci, spreads to adjacent superficial layers of cortex, and spreads to involve medial temporal lobe structures, diencephalon, and brainstem. Over 85% of CTE cases show accumulated phosphorylated 43 kDa TAR DNA-binding protein (TDP-43) in addition to abnormal aggregations of hyperphosphorylated tau. Macroscopic changes in advanced CTE include cavum septum pellucidum, septal fenestrations, or septal absence, diffuse brain volume reduction in frontal, temporal, and medial temporal lobes, hypothalamus, medial thalamus, and mammillary bodies, and ventricular enlargement with disproportionate dilatation of the third ventricle. Currently, CTE can only be diagnosed after death, thus its incidence and prevalence are unknown. Objective validated biomarker(s) are essential to determine CTE risk to athletes. Noninvasive diagnostic techniques include MRI, DTI, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and PET, using ligands specific for paired helical filament–tau.115,116 These potential consequences of concussion are of concern to the medical community and general public; prevention is key.
Section 3: Preventing Concussions Through Behavior, Rules, and Education
Perspectives of a Clinician, Investigator, and Minnesota State High School League (MNHSHL) Sports Medicine Chair
Most injury reduction policies are not evidence-based. Reducing SRC prevalence and severity includes reducing collisions, rule enforcement, and raising awareness about equipment strengths and weaknesses (ie, helmets, face shields, and mouth guards). Primary SRC-specific strategies include reducing collisions by prohibiting body checking, rule enforcement aimed at elimination of head contact, increasing rink size or reducing the players on ice, and increased punishment to deter dangerous infractions. Secondary SRC reduction strategies, actions that require behavioral changes to promote safety, require culture changes across constituents, strict rule enforcement, targeted education programs, and FP. When higher injury and SRC rates were reported in a community hockey cohort and a prospective tournament cohort, due to collision and body checking, delaying body-checking age to decrease injuries was recommended.102 A decade later, an age-matched larger cohort of youth players in a body-checking league were compared with a non–body-checking league (2010).25 Three times more injuries and 4 times more concussions in a Pee Wee (age: 11-12 years) body-checking league prompted a policy change by USA Hockey in 2011, replicated in 2014 by Hockey Canada. Body-checking skills are taught in Pee Wee, but not allowed in games until Bantam (age: 13-14 years). Sport-related concussion, often due to rule infractions, mandates rule compliance. Educating all hockey stakeholders is critical to player respect. Player attitudes showed that 32% would check illegally and 6% would injure another player to win. Hockey is safest during practices and in non–body-checking games.105 Behavior modification programs, such as FP, can shape player, parent, and coach attitudes, and combined with strict rule compliance and enforcement, are critical in our attempts to achieve player safety.16,117
Preventing Concussions by Education and Behavioral Modification (Fair Play)
Games governed by FP rules, can decrease major penalties and game-related injuries, such as SRC.16,117 Sport-related concussion consequences have resulted in modest financial support for behavioral modification programs, such as FP, and educational programs, such as Respect and Protect, Safety Clinics, Smart Hockey (Think First Foundation),20 and Play it Cool, an on-line coaching education program.21 Fair Play, an evidence-based program, launched in MN in 2004, rewards sportsmanship and penalizes dangerous on-ice behavior. In MN Hockey, score sheets depict major and minor penalties and if FP points were earned or lost. Pee Wee players, in 2004 to 2005, averaged 28 CFB penalties per 100 games. In 2011 to 2012, after implementation of no checking in games, Pee Wees achieved an 8 year low of only 3 CFB per 100 games. Head contact also decreased from over 12 per 100 games to less than 1 per 100 games.118 Despite FP point calculations, not all coaches, parents, and players are aware of their teams' FP standings. There is no SRC registry to gauge the influence of FP on decreasing concussions statewide and <25% of directors voluntarily run their tournaments by FP. Measuring FP effect in Junior A tournaments16 or across a single season117 or decade (SMC), at specific levels of participation has demonstrated effectiveness in decreasing head hits.118 In 2013 to 2014, USA Hockey funded a study to determine whether players in tournaments governed by Intensified Fair Play (IFP) sustained fewer SRC, major penalties, provided players equitable on-ice time and whether IFP teams earned more FP points than teams in non-IFP tournaments. While data are being analyzed, next steps include initiating a hockey SRC registry in MN, implementing the team Safety Parent, making FP mandatory in all tournaments and ensuring FP points influence regular season and tournament outcomes.
Play It Cool: A Safe Hockey Coaching Education Program
The PIC Safe Hockey Program was designed to enhance the ability of coaches to teach skills with an emphasis on safety using a structured, facilitated, online curriculum that can be delivered asynchronously. The PIC program consists of 3 modules that focus on strong skating skills, on-ice awareness, and risk management from an injury prevention perspective. Evaluation of the PIC program found that although there were no significant differences in the number of observable positive behaviors between PIC and non-PIC teams, there were a higher number of negative behaviors observed among non-PIC team players at every level of participation (Atoms, Peewee, and Midget).21 Concussion occurrence has not been evaluated.
A Scientist and Hockey Coach's View of Concussion Prevention
Sport-related concussion science can be daunting for coaches. The coaches' role in injury prevention is to teach children age-appropriate hockey fundamentals and foster an environment of sportsmanship. Introducing the skills to safely deliver and receive a body check can result in safer hockey.16,25 For example, anticipating collisions119 and delivering legal body checks may reduce head impact severity. Engaging hockey players in high-tempo and game-related drills help prepare players for unexpected collisions sustained in games. “Small ice” drills require that players pass, shoot, and body check in small, confined spaces (ie, corner of the rink) and teaches them heads up and do not look down. These skills help players to anticipate collisions and prepare for opposing player infractions. Our investigative team identified that >17% of body collisions reviewed on video were USA Hockey rule infractions.28 Of those, 67% resulted from intentional head contact with elbows, sticks, or bodies. Brust et al reported 15% of injuries were intentional, and 34% of injuries occurred in games characterized as “hostile.”102 Players must be taught to respect and not injure opponents. Coaches and officials must ensure players are taught to play fairly in compliance with the rules. Scientific research combined with basic instructional fundamentals can provide the basis for rule changes to protect players from unnecessary head trauma, such as SRC.
At the conclusion of the presentations and breakout sessions, 4 to 5 strategies that emanated from each breakout were projected on slides and attendees were asked to prioritize these using the Audience Response System. The following action items shown in the blocks below were deemed the most important to decrease SRC in ice hockey (Figure).
The information from this Summit provided solid support for and placed its strongest emphasis on removing all head hits and fighting from the game. This highly prioritized action item has already been initiated by USA Hockey rule changes such as the following.
Tier 1 and 2 Junior A
A major penalty plus a misconduct penalty shall be assessed to any player who engages in fighting. A minor, double minor, or major penalty plus a misconduct penalty, at the discretion of the Referee, shall be assessed to any player who, having been struck, continues the altercation by retaliating.
Tier 3 Junior A
A major penalty plus a game ejection penalty shall be assessed to any player who engages in fighting. A minor, double minor, or major penalty plus a game ejection penalty, at the discretion of the Referee, shall be assessed to any player who, having been struck, continues the altercation by retaliating.
Additional Summit II priorities include the following: (1) designing studies that implement a rigorous research epidemiology, (2) moving to standardizing an objective concussion assessment compatible with established diagnostic criteria, and (3) certifying those eligible to return players to hockey. Preventive measures were also deemed critical, such as increased coaching education, wearing equipment in compliance with manufacturer instructions, and making changes to rules, policies, and the overall hockey culture.
When these highly prioritized actions are performed, SRC in ice hockey will decrease and the action plan will be viewed as a success.
“Science has responded to the game on the ice. Now, it's up to the game on the ice to respond to the science.”
Ken Dryden, October 2013
The authors acknowledge Carol Best, Casey Twardowski, John Hollman, Sharanne Calabrese, Kurt Requa, Jason Ward, Nichelle (Nicki) Smith, and Janelle Jorgensen. Additionally, 2 brief presentations preceded the official Summit II program. The authors thank Dr. Miranda Lim for presenting her work on sleep disturbances post-mTBI and Drs. Don Weaver and Ryan D'Arcy for presenting on a new quantitative electroencephalogram (qEEG) device measuring brain activity after head trauma. Studies on these topics show promise for diagnosis and treatment of SRC and are a point of departure for clinical research.
Supporting Organizations: Brian Mark Family Fund, USA Hockey, International Ice Hockey Federation, Hockey Equipment Certification Council, and Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation.
1. Smith AM, Stuart M, Greenwald RM, et al.. Proceedings from the ice hockey summit on concussion: a call to action
. Clin J Sports Med. 2011;21:281–287.
2. Helmer KG, Pasternak O, Fredman E, et al.. Hockey Concussion Education Project, Part 1. Susceptibility-weighted imaging study in male and female ice hockey players over a single season. J Neurosurg. 2014;120:864–872.
3. Pasternak O, Koerte IK, Bouix S, et al.. Hockey Concussion Education Project, Part 2. Microstructural white matter alterations in acutely concussed ice hockey players: a longitudinal free-water MRI study. J Neurosurg. 2014;120:873–881.
4. Sasaki T, Pasternak O, Mayinger M, et al.. Hockey Concussion Education Project, Part 3. White matter microstructure in ice hockey players with a history of concussion: a diffusion tensor imaging study. J Neurosurg. 2014;120:882–890.
5. Gaz D, Stuart MJ. Catastrophic Ice Hockey Registry: USA Hockey and Mayo Clinic. In: Ashare A, Ziejewski M, eds. The Mechanism of Concussion in Sports. Vol STP 1552. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2014:219–233.
6. Federation IIH. IIHF Member National Associations. Available at: http://iihf.com/iihf-home/the-iihf/members.html
. Accessed June 9, 2014.
7. Langlois JA, Rutland-Brown W, Wald MM. The epidemiology and impact of traumatic brain injury: a brief overview. J Head Trauma Rehabilitation. 2006;21:375–378.
8. Benson BW, Meeuwisse WH. Ice hockey injuries. Med Sport Sci. 2005;49:86–119.
9. Benson BW, Meeuwisse WH, Rizos J, et al.. A prospective study of concussions among National Hockey League players during regular season games: the NHL-NHLPA Concussion Program. CMAJ. 2011;183:905–911.
10. Lau BH, Benson BW. Ice hockey. Epidemiol Inj Olympic Sports 2010;XVI:411–446.
11. Marar M, McIlvain NM, Fields SK, et al.. Epidemiology of concussions among United States high school athletes in 20 sports. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40:747–755.
12. McCrory P, Meeuwisse WH, Aubry M, et al.. Consensus statement on concussion in sport: the 4th International Conference on Concussion in Sport held in Zurich, November 2012. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47:250–258.
13. Herring S, Cantu R, Guskiewicz K, et al.. Concussion (mild traumatic brain injury) and the team physician: a consensus statement–2011 update. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43:2412.
14. Benson BW, McIntosh AS, Maddocks D, et al.. What are the most effective risk-reduction strategies in sport concussion? Br J Sports Med. 2013;47:321–326.
15. Rowson S, Duma SM. Brain injury prediction: assessing the combined probability of concussion using linear and rotational head acceleration. Ann Biomed Eng. 2013;41:873–882.
16. Roberts WO, Brust JD, Leonard B, et al.. Fair-play rules and injury reduction in ice hockey. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996;150:140–145.
17. Smith AM, Jorgensen M, Sorenson MC, et al.. Hockey educational program (HEP): a statewide measure of fair play, skill development, and coaching excellence. J ASTM Int (JAI). 2009;6:1–14.
18. Heads Up: Concussion in Youth Sports. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Center for Injury Prevention and Control May 25. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/concussion/HeadsUp/youth.html
. Accessed June 15, 2010.
19. Concussions and Female Athletes: The Untold Story [Twin Cities Public Television ]. Twin Cities Public Television and the Tucker Center for REsearch on Girls & Women in Sport at University of Minnesota; 2011.
20. ThinkFirst SMART HOCKEY. Available at: http://www.thinkfirst.ca/programs/hockey.aspx
. Accessed June 9, 2014.
21. Montelpare W, McPherson M, Sutherland M, et al.. Introduction to the play it cool safe hockey program. Int J Sports Sci Coach. 2010;5:61.
22. Covassin T, Elbin RJ, Sarmiento K. Educating coaches about concussion in sports: evaluation of the CDC's “Heads up: concussion in youth sports” initiative. J Sch Health, 2012;82:233–238.
23. Emery CA, Hagel B, Decloe M, et al.. Risk factors for injury and severe injury in youth ice hockey: a systematic review of the literature. Inj Prev. 2010;16:113–118.
24. Emery CA, Kang J, Schneider KJ, et al.. Risk of injury and concussion associated with team performance and penalty minutes in competitive youth ice hockey. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45:1289–1293.
25. Emery CA, Kang J, Shrier I, et al.. Risk of injury associated with body checking among youth ice hockey players. JAMA. 2010;303:2265–2272.
26. Lacny S, Marshall DA, Currie G, et al.. Reality check: the cost–effectiveness of removing body checking from youth ice hockey. Br J Sports Med. 2014.
27. McKay C, Meeuwisse W, Emery C. Informing body checking policy in youth ice hockey in Canada: a discussion meeting with researchers and community stakeholders. Can J Public Health. 2014;105:445–449.
28. Mihalik JP, Greenwald RM, Blackburn JT, et al.. Effect of Infraction type on head impact severity in youth ice hockey. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42:1431–1438.
29. Klein J. With Focus on Youth Safety, a Sport Considers Changes. New York Times; 2010:D6.
30. Klein J. Hockey Urged to Ban All Blows to Head by Concussions Panel. New York Times; 2010:B19.
31. Aubry M, Cantu R, Dvorak J, et al.. Summary and agreement statement of the First International Conference on Concussion in Sport, Vienna 2001. Recommendations for the improvement of safety and health of athletes who may suffer concussive injuries. Br J Sports Med. 2002;36:6–10.
32. McCrory P, Johnston K, Meeuwisse W, et al.. Summary and agreement statement of the 2nd International Conference on Concussion in Sport, Prague 2004. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39:196–204.
33. McCrory P, Meeuwisse W, Johnston K, et al.. Consensus statement on concussion in sport: the 3rd International Conference on concussion in sport held in Zurich, November 2008. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43(suppl 1):i76–i90.
34. Horgan T, Gilchrist MD. The creation of three-dimensional finite element models for simulating head impact biomechanics. Int J Crashworthiness. 2003;8:353–366.
35. Kendall M, Post A, Zanetti K, et al.. Comparison of dynamic versus static head impact reconstruction methodology by means of dynamic impact response and brain deformation metrics.
36. Kleiven S. Evaluation of head injury criteria using a finite element model validated against experiments on localized brain motion, intracerebral acceleration, and intracranial pressure. Int J Crashworthiness. 2006;11:65–79.
37. Bahr R, Krosshaug T. Understanding injury mechanisms: a key component of preventing injuries in sport. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39:324–329.
38. Meeuwisse WH. Assessing causation in sport injury: a multifactorial model. Clin J Sport Med. 1994;4:166–170.
39. Meeuwisse WH, Tyreman H, Hagel B, et al.. A dynamic model of etiology in sport injury: the recursive nature of risk and causation. Clin J Sport Med. 2007;17:215–219.
40. Smith AM, Stuart MJ, Larson D, et al.. Examining computerized software reliability to measure individual exposure time. Clin J Sport Med. 2014;24:351–354.
41. Twardowski C, Smith AMG, Larson DV, et al.. Epidemiology of Ice Hockey Injury Research Using Reliable Exposure Time Software. In: Ashare A, Ziejewski M, eds. Mechanism of Concussion in Sports. Vol STP 1552. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2014:208–216.
42. van Mechelen W, Hlobil H, Kemper HC. Incidence, severity, aetiology and prevention of sports injuries. Sports Med. 1992;14:82–99.
43. Decloe MD, Meeuwisse WH, Hagel BE, et al.. Injury rates, types, mechanisms and risk factors in female youth ice hockey. Br J Sports Med. 2013.
44. Brainard LL, Beckwith JG, Chu JJ, et al.. Gender differences in head impacts sustained by collegiate ice hockey players. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44:297–304.
45. Duhaime A-C, Beckwith JG, Maerlender AC, et al.. Spectrum of acute clinical characteristics of diagnosed concussions in college athletes wearing instrumented helmets. J Neurosurg. 2012;117:1092.
46. McAllister TW, Flashman LA, Maerlender A, et al.. Cognitive effects of one season of head impacts in a cohort of collegiate contact sport athletes. Neurology. 2012;78:1777–1784.
47. McAllister TW, Ford JC, Flashman LA, et al.. Effect of head impacts on diffusivity measures in a cohort of collegiate contact sport athletes. Neurology. 2014;82:63–69.
48. Wilcox BJ, Beckwith JG, Greenwald RM, et al.. Head impact exposure in male and female collegiate ice hockey players. J Biomech. 2014;47:109–114.
49. Wilcox BJ, Machan JT, Beckwith JG, et al.. Head-impact mechanisms in men's and women's collegiate ice hockey. J Athl Train. 2014;49:514–520.
50. Beckwith JG, Greenwald RM, Chu JJ, et al.. Timing of concussion diagnosis is related to head impact exposure prior to injury. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45:747–754.
51. Beckwith JG, Greenwald RM, Chu JJ, et al.. Head impact exposure sustained by football players on days of diagnosed concussion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45:737–746.
52. Smith A, Gaz D, Stuart M, et al.. At-risk and resilient behaviors: an exploratory video analysis of junior a hockey and diagnosed concussion during competitive on-ice games. J Strength Cond Res.
53. Oeur A, C K, A P, et al.. A Comparison of head dynamic Response and brain Tissue Stress and Strain using Reconstructions of concussion, concussion with Persistent Post-Concussive symptoms, and Subdural Hematoma. J Neurosurg. Accepted October 2014.
54. Horgan TJ, Gilchrist MD. Influence of FE model variability in predicting brain motion and intracranial pressure changes in head impact simulations. Int J Crashworthiness. 2004;9:401–418.
55. Post A, Hoshizaki TB, Gilchrist M, et al.. Analysis of the influence of independent variables used for reconstruction of a traumatic brain injury incident. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P. J Sports Eng Technol. 2012;226:290–298.
56. Post A, Oeur A, Walsh E, et al.. A centric/non-centric impact protocol and finite element model methodology for the evaluation of American football helmets to evaluate risk of concussion. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2014;17:1785–1800.
57. Fijalkowski RJ, Yoganandan N, Zhang J, et al.. A finite element model of region-specific response for mild diffuse brain injury: SAE Technical Paper. 2009.
58. Franklyn M, Fildes B, Zhang L, et al.. Analysis of finite element models for head injury investigation: reconstruction of four real-world impacts: SAE Technical Paper. 2005.
59. Hoshizaki B, Post A, Kendall M, et al.. The Relationship between head impact characteristics and brain trauma. J Neurol Neurophysiol. 2013;5:181.
60. Giza CC, Hovda DA. The neurometabolic cascade of concussion. J Athl Train. 2001;36:228–235.
61. Giza CC, Hovda DA. The new neurometabolic cascade of concussion. Neurosurgery. 2014;75:S24–S33.
62. Choe MC, Babikian T, DiFiori J, et al.. A pediatric perspective on concussion pathophysiology. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2012;24:689–695.
63. Giza CC, DiFiori JP. Pathophysiology of sports-related concussion an update on basic science and translational research. Sports Health. 2011;3:46–51.
64. DeWitt DS, Perez-Polo R, Hulsebosch CE, et al.. Challenges in the development of rodent models of mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2013;30:688–701.
65. Reger ML, Poulos AM, Buen F, et al.. Concussive brain injury enhances fear learning and excitatory processes in the amygdala. Biol Psychiatry. 2012;71:335–343.
66. Prins ML, Alexander D, Giza CC, et al.. Repeated mild traumatic brain injury: mechanisms of cerebral vulnerability. J Neurotrauma. 2013;30:30–38.
67. Griesbach GS, Gómez-Pinilla F, Hovda DA. Time window for voluntary exercise-induced increases in hippocampal neuroplasticity molecules after traumatic brain injury is severity dependent. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24:1161–1171.
68. Alford PW, Dabiri BE, Goss JA, et al.. Blast-induced phenotypic switching in cerebral vasospasm. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:12705–12710.
69. Hemphill MA, Dabiri BE, Gabriele S, et al.. A possible role for integrin signaling in diffuse axonal injury. PLoS One. 2011;6:e22899.
70. Achyuta AKH, Conway AJ, Crouse RB, et al.. A modular approach to create a neurovascular unit-on-a-chip. Lab Chip. 2013;13:542–553.
71. Grosberg A, Alford PW, McCain ML, et al.. Ensembles of engineered cardiac tissues for physiological and pharmacological study: heart on a chip. Lab Chip. 2011;11:4165–4173.
72. Hosmane S, Fournier A, Wright R, et al.. Valve-based microfluidic compression platform: single axon injury and regrowth. Lab Chip. 2011;11:3888–3895.
73. Huh D, Matthews BD, Mammoto A, et al.. Reconstituting organ-level lung functions on a chip. Science. 2010;328:1662–1668.
74. Huh D, Torisawa YS, Hamilton GA, et al.. Microengineered physiological biomimicry: organs-on-chips. Lab Chip. 2012;12:2156–2164.
75. Karatas H, Erdener SE, Gursoy-Ozdemir Y, et al.. Spreading depression triggers headache by activating neuronal Panx1 channels. Science. 2013;339:1092–1095.
76. Lv Q, Fan X, Xu G, et al.. Intranasal delivery of nerve growth factor attenuates aquaporins-4-induced edema following traumatic brain injury in rats. Brain Res. 2013;1493:80–89.
77. Hoffer ME, Balaban C, Slade MD, et al.. Amelioration of acute sequelae of blast induced mild traumatic brain injury by N-acetyl cysteine: a double-blind, placebo controlled study. PLoS One. 2013;8:e54163.
78. Eakin K, Baratz-Goldstein R, Pick CG, et al.. Efficacy of N-acetyl cysteine in traumatic brain injury. PLoS One. 2014;9:e90617.
79. Yuh EL, Mukherjee P, Lingsma HF, et al.. Magnetic resonance imaging improves 3-month outcome prediction in mild traumatic brain injury. Ann Neurol. 2013;73:224–235.
80. Slobounov SM, Zhang K, Pennell D, et al.. Functional abnormalities in normally appearing athletes following mild traumatic brain injury: a functional MRI study. Exp Brain Res. 2010;202:341–354.
81. Dettwiler A, Murugavel M, Putukian M, et al.. Persistent differences in patterns of brain activation after sports-related concussion: a longitudinal functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurotrauma. 2014;31:180–188.
82. Murugavel M, Cubon V, Putukian M, et al.. A longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging study assessing white matter fiber tracts after sports related concussion. J Neurotrauma. 2014;31:1–12.
83. Marino S, Ciurleo R, Bramanti P, et al.. 1H-MR spectroscopy in traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care. 2011;14:127–133.
84. Vagnozzi R, Signoretti S, Cristofori L, et al.. Assessment of metabolic brain damage and recovery following mild traumatic brain injury: a multicentre, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic study in concussed patients. Brain. 2010;133:3232–3242.
85. Schatz P, Pardini JE, Lovell MR, et al.. Sensitivity and specificity of the ImPACT Test Battery for concussion in athletes. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2006;21:91–99.
86. Baker JG, Freitas MS, Leddy JJ, et al.. Return to full functioning after graded exercise assessment and progressive exercise treatment of postconcussion syndrome. Rehabil Res Pract. 2012;2012:705309.
87. Leddy JJ, Baker JG, Kozlowski K, et al.. Reliability of a graded exercise test for assessing recovery from concussion. Clin J Sport Med. 2011;21:89–94.
88. Leddy JJ, Kozlowski K, Donnelly JP, et al.. A preliminary study of subsymptom threshold exercise training for refractory post-concussion syndrome. Clin J Sport Med. 2010;20:21–27.
89. Leddy JJ, Kozlowski K, Fung M, et al.. Regulatory and autoregulatory physiological dysfunction as a primary characteristic of post concussion syndrome: implications for treatment. NeuroRehabilitation. 2007;22:199–205.
90. Leddy JJ, Sandhu H, Sodhi V, et al.. Rehabilitation of concussion and post-concussion syndrome. Sports Health. 2012;4:147–154.
91. Leddy JJ, Willer B. Use of graded exercise testing in concussion and return-to-activity management. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2013;12:370–376.
92. Darling SR, Leddy JJ, Baker JG, et al.. Evaluation of the Zurich guidelines and exercise testing for return to play in adolescents following concussion. Clin J Sport Med. 2014;24:128–133.
93. Schneider KJ, Meeuwisse WH, Kang J, et al.. Preseason reports of neck pain, dizziness, and headache as risk factors for concussion in male youth ice hockey players. Clin J Sport Med. 2013;23:267–272.
94. Schneider KJ, Iverson GL, Emery CA, et al.. The effects of rest and treatment following sport-related concussion: a systematic review of the literature. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47:304–307.
95. Bogduk N, Govind J. Cervicogenic headache: an assessment of the evidence on clinical diagnosis, invasive tests, and treatment. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:959–968.
96. Ernst A, Basta D, Seidl RO, et al.. Management of posttraumatic vertigo. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;132:554–558.
97. Alsalaheen BA, Mucha A, Morris LO, et al.. Vestibular rehabilitation for dizziness and balance disorders after concussion. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2010;34:87–93.
98. Jull G, Trott P, Potter H, et al.. A randomized controlled trial of exercise and manipulative therapy for cervicogenic headache. Spine. 2002;27:1835–1843; discussion 1843.
99. Miller J, Gross A, D'Sylva J, et al.. Manual therapy and exercise for neck pain: a systematic review. Man Ther. 2010;15:334–354.
100. Schneider KJ, Meeuwisse WH, Nettel-Aguirre A, et al.. Cervicovestibular rehabilitation in sport-related concussion: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Sports Med. 2014.
101. Bonfield CM, Lam S, Lin Y, et al.. The impact of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder on recovery from mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2013;12:97–102.
102. Brust JD, Leonard BJ, Pheley A, et al.. Children's ice hockey injuries. Am J Dis Child. 1992;146:741–747.
103. Covassin T, Elbin RJ, Harris W, et al.. The role of age and sex in symptoms, neurocognitive performance, and postural stability in athletes after concussion. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40:1303–1312.
104. Halstead ME, Walter KD. American Academy of Pediatrics. Clinical report—sport-related concussion in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2010;126:597–615.
105. Reid SR, Losek JD. Factors associated with significant injuries in youth ice hockey players. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1999;15:310–313.
106. Hudziak J, Crehan E, RA A, et al.. Prevelence, genetic Architecture, and Sequellae of concussion in a Twin Population. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2014.
107. Tierney RT, Mansell JL, Higgins M, et al.. Apolipoprotein E genotype and concussion in college athletes. Clin J Sport Med. 2010;20:464–468.
108. Terrell TR, Bostick R, Rogers GL, et al.. Association of APOE and other genetic polymorphisms with prospective concussion risk in a prospective cohort study of college athletes. Paper presented at: Biomedical Science and Engineering Center Conference (BSEC), 2014 Annual Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2014.
109. Terrell TR, Bostick RM, Abramson R, et al.. APOE, APOE promoter, and Tau genotypes and risk for concussion in college athletes. Clin J Sport Med. 2008;18:10–17.
110. Delacourte A, Buée L. Tau pathology: a marker of neurodegenerative disorders. Curr Opin Neurol. 2000;13:371–376.
111. Goldstein LE, McKee AC, Stanton PK. Considerations for animal models of blast-related traumatic brain injury and chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2014;6:64.
112. Stern RA, Daneshvar DH, Baugh CM, et al.. Clinical presentation of chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Neurology. 2013;81:1122–1129.
113. Goldstein LE, Fisher AM, Tagge CA, et al.. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy in blast-exposed military veterans and a blast neurotrauma mouse model. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4:134ra160.
114. McKee AC, Cantu RC, Nowinski CJ, et al.. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy in athletes: progressive tauopathy after repetitive head injury. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2009;68:709–735.
115. Lin A, Ramadan S, Box H, et al.. Neurochemical changes in athletes with chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Paper presented at: Radiological society of North America, 2010.
116. Chien DT, Bahri S, Szardenings AK, et al.. Early clinical PET imaging results with the novel PHF-tau radioligand [F-18]-T807. J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;34:457–468.
117. Marcotte G, Simard D. Fair Play: an approach to hockey for the 1990s. ASTM Saf Ice Hockey. 1993;2:100–108.
118. Smith AM, Twardowski C, Gaz D, et al.. Hockey Education Program: Fair Play Implemation Issues and a Feasible Solution. In: Ashare A, Ziejewski M, eds. The Mechanism of Concussion in Sports. Vol STP 1552. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2014:234–245.
119. Mihalik JP, Blackburn JT, Greenwald RM, et al.. Collision type and player anticipation affect head impact severity among youth ice hockey players. Pediatrics. 2010;125:e1394–e1401.