Introduction
Dietary changes are an important low-risk intervention that can improve health outcomes. Current guidelines recommend restricting protein, phosphorous, and sodium intake in patients with CKD (1–3). In addition, there is increasing evidence on the effects of beverages on kidney health (4). Moderate coffee consumption (three to five 8-ounce cups per day) has been associated with lower risk of incident kidney disease (5–7). However, given the complex chemical composition of coffee, the biologic mechanisms linking coffee to kidney disease are unclear (5–7). Furthermore, there is a need to identify new biomarkers of food and beverages.
Metabolomic profiling is one approach to understanding biologic mediators of disease associations due to the close proximity of metabolites with disease phenotypes. Metabolomics allows for the detection of small molecules between 50 and 1500 D in size in an untargeted manner. Studies have recently demonstrated that metabolite levels in blood may reflect food consumption and its metabolism (8,9).
We aimed to use metabolomics to find metabolites that may reflect coffee consumption and to explore the prospective association between these coffee-associated metabolites and incident CKD. We hypothesized that some metabolites, particularly those within the xenobiotics category and xanthine metabolism pathway, would be associated with coffee consumption. In addition, we hypothesized that a subset of metabolites altered by coffee consumption would also be associated with incident CKD.
Materials and Methods
Study Design and Populations
We used two independent study populations to discover and validate coffee-associated metabolites. In the discovery analysis, we identified serum metabolites cross-sectionally associated with coffee consumption in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. These associations were validated in Bogalusa Heart Study (BHS) participants. We then evaluated associations of validated coffee-associated metabolites with incident CKD in ARIC.
The ARIC study is a prospective community-based cohort that enrolled 15,792 predominantly Black and White men and women between 45 and 64 years of age. In 1987–1989 (visit 1), participants were enrolled from four US communities: Forsyth County, North Carolina; Jackson, Mississippi; suburbs of Minneapolis, Minnesota; and Washington County, Maryland. Participants were followed at clinical visits in 1990–1992 (visit 2), 1993–1995 (visit 3), 1996–1998 (visit 4), 2011–2013 (visit 5), 2016–2017 (visit 6), and 2018–2019 (visit 7). Participants also underwent active surveillance for all deaths, hospitalizations, and development of kidney failure. An ethics committee at each site approved the study protocol, study participants provided informed consent at each study visit, and procedures were followed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (10).
For this study, we included participants who had metabolomic profiling data from serum specimens obtained during visit 1 (n=4032). We then excluded participants who had implausible levels of total energy intake (n=20; defined as <500 or >3500 kcal/d for women and <700 or >4500 kcal/d for men), who had missing coffee consumption data (n=4), or who had prevalent CKD at visit 1 (n=72), defined as eGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m2. We additionally excluded participants with missing covariate data: body mass index (BMI; n=3), physical activity (n=14), education (n=7), diabetes status (n=5), antihypertensive medication use (n=3), Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet score (n=74), and alcohol consumption status (n=19). In total, 3811 ARIC study participants were included in the discovery analysis, which was analyzed according to the sample in which metabolites were measured: 1807 participants in sample 1 and 2004 participants in sample 2 (Figure 1).
Figure 1.: Flow chart of selection of study participants in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. BMI, body mass index; DASH, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension.
BHS is a community-based long-term epidemiologic study in a biracial community in Bogalusa, Louisiana (11). The main study consisted of a series of cross-sectional studies of children and adults performed from 1973 to 2016 (n=16,164). The study’s current core cohort includes 1298 participants born between 1959 and 1979 who were screened at least twice during childhood and twice during adulthood. In this study, we included BHS participants with serum metabolite and dietary data (n=1043). Informed consent was obtained from all BHS participants after detailed explanation of the study, the study was approved by the institutional review boards at all participating institutions, and procedures were followed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (12).
Metabolomic Profiling
Metabolites were measured by Metabolon, Inc. (Durham, NC) using an untargeted, ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry approach using fasting serum samples from visit 1 in the ARIC study and using serum samples from the 2013–2016 visit in BHS (13,14). In the ARIC study, serum samples were analyzed separately in two samples, with sample 1 consisting of a random sample of ARIC study participants at the Jackson, Mississippi site and sample 2 consisting of ARIC participants with sequencing data; 374 known metabolites and 759 known metabolites were identified in sample 1 and sample 2, respectively. A total of 372 known metabolites that were identified in both samples were used in the primary analysis. In BHS, 1055 known metabolites were identified. Metabolite values were rescaled to a median of one and log transformed for analysis due to their non-normal distribution.
Coffee Consumption
In the ARIC population, coffee consumption was assessed via a 66-item semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire, which was administered in person by a trained interviewer at visit 1. Participants were asked to report how frequently they consumed an 8-ounce cup of regular (non-decaffeinated) coffee on average over the past year, with nine options ranging from “almost never” to “>6 cups per day.” In BHS, coffee consumption was assessed in a validated (15), self-administered, semiquantitative 131-item food frequency questionnaire (16). Participants were asked how frequently they typically consumed 1 cup of “not decaf” coffee over the past year. Additional information on the assessment of covariates is available in Supplemental Material.
Definition of Incident CKD
Incident CKD was defined by at least one of the following four criteria: (1) development of reduced kidney function (eGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m2) accompanied by ≥25% eGFR decline at any subsequent study visit relative to baseline, (2) International Classification of Diseases 9/10 (ICD 9/10) code for a hospitalization related to CKD stage 3+ identified through active surveillance, (3) ICD 9/10 code for a death related to CKD stage 3+ identified through linkage to the National Death Index, or (4) kidney failure identified by linkage to the United States Renal Data System registry (17).
Statistical Analyses
For the discovery analysis of the cross-sectional association between coffee and metabolites in ARIC, we used multivariable linear regression models conducted separately for the two samples to calculate β-coefficients and 95% confidence intervals adjusted for age, sex, race-center, education, BMI, physical activity, total energy intake, eGFR, smoking, alcohol consumption, and DASH diet score. Fixed effects meta-analysis was used to pool the results from the two ARIC samples. All metabolites available in both samples of ARIC (n=372) were included in the multivariable linear regression models in ARIC, and metabolites significantly associated with coffee consumption in the meta-analysis of ARIC were included in the replication analysis in BHS. For the replication analysis in BHS, we used the same linear regression model but replaced the race-center covariate with race. For the main analysis, coffee was analyzed as a continuous variable. In addition, we assessed whether there was a dose-response relationship between coffee, as a categorical variable, and metabolites.
The prospective analysis was limited to metabolites that were statistically significantly associated with coffee consumption in both the ARIC meta-analysis and BHS replication analysis. Cox proportional hazards models were used in both ARIC samples to calculate hazard ratios and and 95% confidence intervals for the association between metabolites and risk of incident CKD adjusted for age, sex, race-center, education, BMI, physical activity, total energy intake, eGFR, smoking, alcohol consumption, DASH diet score, diabetes, systolic BP, and antihypertensive medication use. Follow-up time was calculated from baseline until the date of an event (incident CKD), the date of a death (for deaths that were unrelated to CKD), or the end of the study. There was no loss to follow-up given that the CKD definition combined surveillance with visit-based measures, and no participants withdrew consent for follow-up.
For those metabolites that were statistically significantly associated with both coffee and incident CKD, we investigated whether the metabolites were associated with other lifestyle factors, and we calculated differences in absolute risk of incident CKD according to quartiles of metabolites with quartile 1 as the reference group.
Statistical tests were two tailed. Statistical significance was assessed after accounting for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni approach (i.e., P=0.05/372=1.34 × 10−4 for both samples of ARIC and the meta-analysis for the cross-sectional analysis of metabolites and coffee, P=0.05/40=1.25 × 10−3 for BHS, and P=0.05/20=0.0025 for the prospective analysis between coffee and incident CKD). All analyses were performed using Stata software (version 15.0; StataCorp).
Results
Baseline Characteristics
In the overall ARIC study population, mean (SD) age was 54 (6) years, 60% were women, and 61% were Black (Table 1). About a third of ARIC participants had at least some college education, mean BMI was 28 kg/m2, and 28% were current smokers. Sample 1 was composed entirely of Black participants from Jackson, Mississippi, whereas in sample 2, 27% of participants were Black and all four ARIC study centers were represented. Participants who consumed coffee more frequently were less likely to be Black and to have diabetes, had lower BMI and systolic BP, and were more likely to be current smokers and current drinkers (Supplemental Table 1).
Table 1. -
Baseline characteristics of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study and Bogalusa Heart Study participants
Baseline Characteristics, n (%) or Mean ± SD |
Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities |
Bogalusa Heart Study |
Sample 1, n=1807 |
Sample 2, n=2004 |
Total Sample, n=3811 |
Total Sample, n=1043 |
Age, yr |
53±6 |
54±6 |
54±6 |
48±5 |
Women |
1166 (65) |
1135 (57) |
2301 (60) |
627 (60) |
Race
|
|
|
|
|
White |
0 (0) |
1470 (73) |
1470 (39) |
717 (69) |
Black |
1807 (100) |
534 (27) |
2341 (61) |
326 (31) |
Education level
|
|
|
|
|
Less than or equal to high school or equivalent |
1240 (69) |
1291 (64) |
2531 (66) |
495 (48) |
Greater than or equal to college |
567 (31) |
713 (36) |
1280 (34) |
548 (53) |
Body mass index, kg/m2
|
29.6±6 |
27.9±5 |
28.7±6 |
31.4±7.6 |
Center
|
|
|
|
|
Forsyth County, North Carolina |
0 (0.0) |
572 (29) |
572 (15) |
— |
Jackson, Mississippi |
1807 (100) |
410 (20) |
2217 (58) |
— |
Minneapolis, Minnesota |
0 (0.0) |
506 (25) |
506 (13) |
— |
Washington County, Maryland |
0 (0.0) |
516 (26) |
516 (14) |
— |
Smoking status
|
|
|
|
|
Never smoker |
887 (49) |
812 (41) |
1699 (45) |
559 (54) |
Former smoker |
406 (22) |
643 (32) |
1049 (28) |
306 (29) |
Current smoker |
514 (28) |
549 (27) |
1063 (28) |
178 (17) |
Alcohol intake status
|
|
|
|
|
Never |
891 (49) |
491 (25) |
1382 (36) |
120 (12) |
Former |
375 (21) |
388 (19) |
763 (20) |
345 (33) |
Current |
541 (30) |
1125 (56) |
1666 (44) |
579 (56) |
Total energy intake, kcal/d |
1588±617 |
1662±608 |
1627±613 |
2240±1029 |
Baseline eGFR, ml/min per 1.73 m2
|
114±17 |
102±15 |
108±17 |
94±17 |
Physical activity
a
|
2.1±0.7 |
2.4±0.8 |
2.3±0.8 |
4905±4669 |
Systolic BP, mm Hg |
128±21 |
122±20 |
125±21 |
123±17 |
Diabetes |
288 (16) |
225 (11) |
513 (13) |
184 (18) |
Antihypertensive medication |
730 (40) |
642 (32) |
1372 (36) |
354 (34) |
Coffee consumption, 8-ounce cups per d
|
|
|
|
|
>3 |
78 (4) |
347 (17) |
425 (11) |
207 (20) |
2–3 |
331 (18) |
473 (24) |
804 (21) |
190 (18) |
1 |
519 (29) |
375 (19) |
894 (23) |
50 (5) |
<1 |
230 (13) |
264 (13) |
494 (13) |
185 (18) |
Almost never |
649 (36) |
545 (27) |
1194 (31) |
411 (39) |
—, not applicable (the centers listed are involved in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study).
aPhysical activity was quantified as a score (with a range from one to five) in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study and as metabolic equivalent task (MET) minutes/week in the Bogalusa Heart Study.
In BHS, mean (SD) age was 48 (5) years, 60% were women, and 31% were Black. A little over half of participants continued their education past high school, mean BMI was 31 kg/m2, 17% were current smokers, and 56% were current drinkers. In BHS, a slightly larger proportion of participants drank 2 or more cups of coffee per day (38% in BHS versus 32% in ARIC), but a smaller proportion drank 1 cup of coffee per day (5% in BHS versus 24% in ARIC).
Association between Serum Metabolites and Coffee Consumption
In sample 1 of ARIC, 13 metabolites were statistically significantly associated with coffee consumption (Supplemental Table 2). In sample 2 of ARIC, 37 metabolites were statistically significantly associated with coffee consumption (Supplemental Table 3), including 12 of the 13 that were statistically significantly associated with coffee in sample 1.
In the meta-analysis of both ARIC samples, 41 metabolites were statistically significantly associated with coffee consumption (Table 2). The majority of significant metabolites were xenobiotics (n=23), followed by lipids (n=9), amino acids (n=6), carbohydrates (n=1), peptides (n=1), and energy (n=1) (Figure 2).
Table 2. -
Metabolites associated with coffee intake in a meta-analysis of two subsamples of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study and the Bogalusa Heart Study
Metabolite |
Superpathway |
Subpathway |
Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities |
Bogalusa Heart Study |
β (95% Confidence Interval) |
P Value |
β (95% Confidence Interval) |
P Value |
Quinate |
Xenobiotics |
Food component/plant |
0.311 (0.277 to 0.345) |
7.14×10−73
|
0.438 (0.389 to 0.487) |
1.00×10−28
|
Paraxanthine |
Xenobiotics |
Xanthine metabolism |
0.292 (0.258 to 0.327) |
5.74×10−62
|
0.097 (0.067 to 0.126) |
2.08×10−10
|
1-Methylurate |
Xenobiotics |
Xanthine metabolism |
0.239 (0.211 to 0.267) |
3.80×10−61
|
0.098 (0.075 to 0.121) |
1.96×10−16
|
3-Hydroxypyridine sulfate |
Xenobiotics |
Chemical |
0.223 (0.195 to 0.251) |
1.72×10−55
|
0.185 (0.153 to 0.217) |
1.30×10−28
|
1-Methylxanthine |
Xenobiotics |
Xanthine metabolism |
0.189 (0.164 to 0.215) |
9.62×10−48
|
0.130 (0.100 to 0.160) |
1.61×10−16
|
5-Acetylamino-6-amino-3-methyluracil |
Xenobiotics |
Xanthine metabolism |
0.226 (0.194 to 0.258) |
2.68×10−44
|
0.145 (0.114 to 0.176) |
1.45×10−19
|
Theophylline |
Xenobiotics |
Xanthine metabolism |
0.208 (0.175 to 0.242) |
8.27×10−35
|
0.105 (0.074 to 0.136) |
3.67×10−11
|
Caffeine |
Xenobiotics |
Xanthine metabolism |
0.215 (0.178 to 0.252) |
1.13×10−29
|
0.060 (0.017 to 0.104) |
0.006 |
Catechol sulfate |
Xenobiotics |
Benzoate metabolism |
0.102 (0.084 to 0.120) |
2.63×10−29
|
0.051 (0.032 to 0.070) |
1.81×10−7
|
Hippurate |
Xenobiotics |
Benzoate metabolism |
0.135 (0.111 to 0.158) |
5.91×10−29
|
0.048 (0.025 to 0.070) |
3.27×10−5
|
1,7-Dimethylurate |
Xenobiotics |
Xanthine metabolism |
0.152 (0.125 to 0.179) |
5.01×10−28
|
0.097 (0.065 to 0.128) |
2.59×10−9
|
3-Methyl catechol sulfate (1) |
Xenobiotics |
Benzoate metabolism |
0.134 (0.108 to 0.161) |
2.87×10−23
|
0.093 (0.061 to 0.126) |
1.68×10−8
|
O-methylcatechol sulfate |
Xenobiotics |
Benzoate metabolism |
0.081 (0.062 to 0.100) |
2.70×10−16
|
0.040 (0.018 to 0.060) |
2.10×10−4
|
Theobromine |
Xenobiotics |
Xanthine metabolism |
0.126 (0.095 to 0.156) |
1.03×10−15
|
0.043 (0.013 to 0.073) |
0.005 |
3-Phenylpropionate (hydrocinnamate) |
Amino acid |
Phenylalanine and tyrosine metabolism |
0.098 (0.074 to 0.122) |
2.03×10−15
|
0.032 (0.004 to 0.060) |
0.03 |
3-Hydroxyhippurate |
Xenobiotics |
Benzoate metabolism |
0.136 (0.101 to 0.170) |
6.04×10−15
|
0.095 (0.056 to 0.134) |
1.53×10−6
|
7-Methylxanthine |
Xenobiotics |
Xanthine metabolism |
0.102 (0.075 to 0.128) |
4.19×10−14
|
0.077 (0.051 to 0.104) |
1.33×10−8
|
Cinnamoylglycine |
Xenobiotics |
Food component/plant |
0.106 (0.077 to 0.136) |
1.16×10−12
|
0.057 (0.015 to 0.099) |
0.007 |
Homostachydrine |
Xenobiotics |
Food component/plant |
0.054 (0.039 to 0.069) |
1.84×10−12
|
0.035 (0.019 to 0.051) |
1.72×10−5
|
1,3,7-Trimethylurate |
Xenobiotics |
Xanthine metabolism |
0.109 (0.078 to 0.140) |
4.91×10−12
|
0.060 (0.027 to 0.093) |
3.37×10−4
|
3-Methylxanthine |
Xenobiotics |
Xanthine metabolism |
0.078 (0.050 to 0.107) |
8.92×10−08
|
0.073 (0.047 to 0.099) |
3.06×10−8
|
Docosahexaenoate (DHA; 22:6n3) |
Lipid |
Polyunsaturated fatty acid (n3 and n6) |
−0.022 (−0.031 to −0.013) |
4.51×10−07
|
0.004 (−0.007 to 0.015) |
0.50 |
1,3-Dimethylurate |
Xenobiotics |
Xanthine metabolism |
0.090 (0.055 to 0.125) |
4.94×10−07
|
0.121 (0.095 to 0.148) |
2.52×10−18
|
Adrenate (22:4n6) |
Lipid |
Polyunsaturated fatty acid (n3 and n6) |
−0.027 (−0.038 to −0.016) |
1.64×10−06
|
0.001 (−0.012 to 0.014) |
0.89 |
Dihomo-linoleate (20:2n6) |
Lipid |
Polyunsaturated fatty acid (n3 and n6) |
−0.024 (−0.035 to −0.014) |
1.83×10−06
|
−0.002 (−0.014 to 0.010) |
0.71 |
Erythronate |
Carbohydrate |
Aminosugar metabolism |
−0.017 (−0.024 to −0.010) |
2.94×10−06
|
−0.003 (−0.009 to 0.003) |
0.30 |
Malate |
Energy |
TCA cycle |
−0.018 (−0.026 to −0.010) |
6.19×10−06
|
−0.006 (−0.014 to 0.001) |
0.09 |
Stearidonate (18:4n3) |
Lipid |
Polyunsaturated fatty acid (n3 and n6) |
−0.033 (−0.048 to −0.019) |
6.33×10−06
|
0.005 (−0.018 to 0.027) |
0.69 |
Glycocholate |
Lipid |
Primary bile acid metabolism |
−0.069 (−0.099 to −0.039) |
6.53×10−06
|
−0.040 (−0.068 to −0.012) |
0.006 |
Cyclo(leu-pro) |
Peptide |
Dipeptide |
0.048 (0.027 to 0.069) |
7.12×10−06
|
— |
— |
α-Hydroxyisovalerate |
Amino acid |
Leucine, isoleucine, and valine metabolism |
−0.031 (−0.045 to −0.018) |
7.31×10−06
|
−0.024 (−0.039 to −0.009) |
0.003 |
Isovalerate |
Amino acid |
Leucine, isoleucine, and valine metabolism |
−0.019 (−0.027 to −0.010) |
1.53×10−05
|
0.002 (−0.007 to 0.012) |
0.65 |
O-sulfo-L-tyrosine |
Xenobiotics |
Chemical |
−0.015 (−0.022 to −0.008) |
1.84×10−05
|
−0.003 (−0.009 to 0.003) |
0.37 |
Erythritol |
Xenobiotics |
Food component/plant |
−0.014 (−0.021 to −0.008) |
1.94×10−05
|
−0.002 (−0.013 to 0.009) |
0.79 |
Phenol sulfate |
Amino acid |
Phenylalanine and tyrosine metabolism |
−0.045 (−0.066 to −0.024) |
2.09×10−05
|
0.009 (−0.012 to 0.029) |
0.41 |
Docosapentaenoate (n3 DPA; 22:5n3) |
Lipid |
Polyunsaturated fatty acid (n3 and n6) |
−0.025 (−0.037 to −0.013) |
3.90×10−05
|
0.006 (−0.006 to 0.018) |
0.36 |
Myristoleate (14:1n5) |
Lipid |
Long-chain fatty acid |
−0.026 (−0.039 to −0.014) |
4.63×10−05
|
0.005 (−0.012 to 0.021) |
0.58 |
2-Hydroxy-3-methylvalerate |
Amino acid |
Leucine, isoleucine, and valine metabolism |
−0.036 (−0.054 to −0.019) |
5.16×10−05
|
−0.023 (−0.037 to −0.009) |
0.001
|
Palmitoleate (16:1n7) |
Lipid |
Long-chain fatty acid |
−0.024 (−0.036 to −0.012) |
6.39×10−05
|
0.001 (−0.017 to 0.018) |
0.93 |
Glycine |
Amino acid |
Glycine, serine, and threonine metabolism |
0.016 (0.008 to 0.025) |
8.66×10−05
|
0.004 (−0.003 to 0.011) |
0.28 |
Glycochenodeoxycholate |
Lipid |
Primary bile acid metabolism |
−0.083 (−0.125 to −0.041) |
1.14×10−04
|
−0.049 (−0.074 to −0.023) |
2.31×10−4
|
Adjusted for age, sex, race, education, cigarette smoking, alcohol drinking, physical activity, total energy intake, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension diet score, tea consumption, eGFR, and body mass index. Bold P values are statistically significant (Bonferroni-corrected thresholds for statistical significance of P=0.05/372=1.34 × 10−4 for the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study and P=0.05/40=1.25 × 10−3 for Bogalusa Heart Study). DHA, docosahexaenic acid; TCA, tricarboxylic acid cycle; —, not applicable [cyclo(leu-pro) was not available in the Bogalusa Heart Study]; DPA, docosapentaenoic acid.
Figure 2.: Volcano plot depicting β -coefficients and −log 10 P values from meta-analysis of serum metabolites and coffee consumption in the ARIC study. Each dot represents a single metabolite. Metabolites above the red horizontal line were statistically significant (P=0.05/372=1.34 × 10−4). The color of the dots represents the superpathway classification of the metabolites.
Of 41 metabolites statistically significantly associated with coffee consumption in the meta-analysis of ARIC samples, 40 metabolites were available to be analyzed in BHS (Table 2). Among these 40 metabolites, 20 metabolites replicated in terms of the direction and statistical significance of their associations with coffee consumption (P=0.05/40=1.25 × 10−3), including 18 metabolites positively associated and two metabolites inversely associated with coffee consumption. The replicated metabolites included 18 xenobiotics, one amino acid, and one lipid.
For all of the 20 replicated metabolites, there was a dose-response relationship across categories of coffee consumption (Supplemental Table 4).
Association between Serum Metabolites and Incident CKD
Among ARIC participants, there were 1180 (31%) cases of incident CKD that occurred over a median follow-up of 24 years. Of the 20 metabolites consistently associated with coffee consumption (i.e., in the ARIC meta-analysis and the replication analysis in BHS), three metabolites were statistically significantly associated with incident CKD (Figure 3). Glycochenodeoxycholate, a lipid involved in primary bile acid metabolism, was inversely associated with coffee consumption and positively associated with incident CKD (Table 3). O-methylcatechol sulfate and 3-methyl catechol sulfate (1), two xenobiotics representative of benzoate metabolism, were positively associated with both coffee consumption and incident CKD.
Figure 3.: Volcano plot depicting hazard ratios and −log 10 P values from prospective analysis of coffee-associated serum metabolites and incident CKD in the ARIC study. Each dot represents a single metabolite. Metabolites above the red horizontal line were statistically significant (P=0.05/20=0.0025). The color of the dots represents the superpathway classification of the metabolites.
Table 3. -
Serum metabolites statistically significantly associated with coffee consumption and incident CKD in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study
Metabolite |
Superpathway |
Subpathway |
Cross-Sectional Analysis (Metabolites and Coffee)
a
|
Prospective Analysis (Metabolites and CKD)
b
|
β (95% Confidence Interval) |
P Value |
Hazard Ratio (95% Confidence Interval) |
P Value |
Glycochenodeoxycholate |
Lipid |
Primary bile acid metabolism |
−0.083 (−0.125 to −0.041) |
1.14×10−4
|
1.05 (1.02 to 1.07) |
6.44×10−4
|
O-methylcatechol sulfate |
Xenobiotics |
Benzoate metabolism |
0.081 (0.062 to 0.100) |
2.70×10−16
|
1.14 (1.07 to 1.21) |
5.98×10−5
|
3-Methyl catechol sulfate (1) |
Xenobiotics |
Benzoate metabolism |
0.134 (0.108 to 0.161) |
2.87×10−23
|
1.09 (1.04 to 1.14) |
1.39×10−4
|
Statistical significance was assessed after accounting for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni approach (P=0.05/20=0.0025).
aAdjusted for age, sex, race-center, education, body mass index, physical activity, total energy intake, eGFR, smoking, alcohol consumption, and Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension diet score.
bAdjusted for age, sex, race-center, education, body mass index, physical activity, total energy intake, eGFR, smoking, alcohol consumption, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension diet score, diabetes, systolic BP, and antihypertensive medication use. Hazard ratios are expressed per one unit higher in the metabolite.
There were small but statistically significantly higher risk of incident CKD for the highest versus lowest quartile for glycohenodeoxycholate, O-methylcatechol sulfate, and 3-methyl catechol sulfate (Table 4).
Table 4. -
Absolute risk differences by quartile for serum metabolites statistically significantly associated with coffee consumption and incident CKD in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study
Metabolite and Quartile |
Absolute Risk Difference (95% Confidence Interval) |
P Value |
Glycochenodeoxycholate
|
|
|
Quartile 1 |
Reference |
|
Quartile 2 |
0.00047 (−0.0019 to 0.0029) |
0.70 |
Quartile 3 |
0.0010 (−0.0014 to 0.0035) |
0.41 |
Quartile 4 |
0.0035 (0.0009 to 0.0061) |
0.008 |
O-methylcatechol sulfate
|
|
|
Quartile 1 |
Reference |
|
Quartile 2 |
0.00053 (−0.0019 to 0.0029) |
0.67 |
Quartile 3 |
0.0040 (0.0013 to 0.0067) |
0.003 |
Quartile 4 |
0.0088 (0.0059 to 0.0117) |
<0.001 |
3-Methyl catechol sulfate (1)
|
|
|
Quartile 1 |
Reference |
|
Quartile 2 |
0.0026 (0.0002 to 0.0050) |
0.04 |
Quartile 3 |
0.0047 (0.0021 to 0.0074) |
<0.001 |
Quartile 4 |
0.0094 (0.0065 to 0.0123) |
<0.001 |
The three metabolites that were associated with coffee and incident CKD (glycohenodeoxycholate, O-methylcatechol sulfate, and 3-methyl catechol sulfate) were also associated with current smoking status, with higher levels of the metabolites among current smokers (Supplemental Table 5).
Discussion
Leveraging untargeted metabolomic data of known serum metabolites, we discovered 41 metabolites significantly associated with coffee consumption in 3811 middle-aged Black and White men and women in the ARIC study. Twenty of the 41 metabolites replicated in an independent sample of 1043 Black and White men and women in BHS. There was a dose-response relationship between metabolites and categories of coffee consumption. Higher levels of three of these coffee-related metabolites were significantly associated with higher relative and absolute risks of developing kidney disease during follow-up: glycochenodeoxycholate, O-methylcatechol sulfate, and 3-methyl catechol sulfate.
Of the 20 metabolites that were associated with coffee consumption in the ARIC meta-analysis and in BHS, ten metabolites (1-methylurate; 1,3,7-trimethylurate; 1,7-dimethylurate; 1,3-dimethylurate; 1-methylxanthine; 3-methylxanthine; 7-methylxanthine; theophylline; 5-acetylamino-6-amino-3-methyluracil; and paraxanthine) were involved in xanthine metabolism. Caffeine (1,3,7-trimethylxanthine) is a well-known component of coffee beverages, and theophylline, paraxanthine, and 1,3,7-trimethylurate are all direct products of caffeine metabolism by the cytochrome P450 oxidase enzyme system in the liver (18,19).
Another five coffee-associated metabolites (hippurate, 3-hydroxyhippurate, catechol sulfate, 3-methyl catechol sulfate, and O-methylcatechol sulfate) were involved in benzoate metabolism. Benzoate is both present in coffee and a downstream metabolite of chlorogenic acids that are naturally present in coffee, and benzoic acid can be formed by gut microbial degradation of dietary phenols, polyphenols, and tannins present in coffee (20–22). Hippurate has been identified as a potential serum marker of dietary acid load in a metabolomics study of 689 patients with CKD in the African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension and 356 patients with CKD in the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study, and coffee is known to affect dietary acid load (23).
Previous metabolomic studies of coffee consumption provide support for our findings by identifying some of the same metabolites as potential biomarkers for coffee consumption. One study analyzed the serum metabolome of 47 Finnish habitual coffee consumers who underwent an investigator-blinded, three-stage clinical trial where participants refrained from drinking coffee for 1 month, consumed 4 cups of coffee per day in the second month, and consumed 8 cups per day in the third month (24). This study replicated the positive association of all 18 xenobiotics that were associated with coffee in both ARIC and BHS. Another nested patient-control study of 251 patients with colorectal cancer and 247 matched controls from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial in the United States found associations between coffee consumption and nine (quinate; paraxanthine; catechol sulfate; 1-methylxanthine; theophylline; 1-methylurate; 1,7-dimethylurate; 3-hydroxyhippurate; and 1,3,7-trimethylurate) of the 20 replicated coffee-associated metabolites from this study (19). A cross-sectional analysis of 1595 women in two separate cohorts in the United States also found several of our replicated coffee-associated metabolites to be associated with coffee consumption, including xanthine metabolism metabolites (1,7-dimethylurate; 7-methylxanthine; and 5-acetylamino-6-amino-3-methyluracil) (25). Lastly, a previous study focused on metabolites associated with food groups in only 1977 Black ARIC study participants (sample 1) found nine metabolites to be associated with coffee consumption (quinate; paraxanthine; 5-acetylamino-6-amino-3-methyluracil; 1,7-dimethylurate; 1-methylurate; 1-methylxanthine; caffeine; 1,3,7-trimethylurate; and 7-methylxanthine). All nine of these metabolites were significantly associated with coffee consumption in this ARIC meta-analysis, and eight of the nine metabolites (all metabolites except for caffeine) also replicated in BHS (26). Further research is needed to confirm these metabolites as potential objective biomarkers of coffee consumption.
This is one of the first population-based studies to assess the role of coffee-associated metabolites in kidney disease among a diverse sample of middle-aged adults. We were able to identify three coffee-associated metabolites that were associated with incident CKD. Glycochenodeoxycholate, a lipid representative of primary bile acid metabolism, was negatively associated with coffee consumption but positively associated with risk for incident CKD in this analysis. Primary bile acids are synthesized from cholesterol in the liver and serve an important role in regulating lipid, glucose, energy, and cholesterol homeostasis (27,28). The metabolism of primary bile acids contributes toward the bile acid pool, the composition of which has been hypothesized to be associated with several disease states, including metabolic syndrome (28,29). In a nested case-control study of 221 patients with liver cancer and 242 patients with fatal liver disease in the α-Tocopherol, β-Carotene Cancer Prevention cohort, glycochenodeoxycholic acid was found to be inversely associated with coffee and positively associated with both liver cancer and fatal liver disease (30). However, this study is the first to find an association between glycochenodeoxycholate and kidney disease, and the exact mechanisms through which this metabolite could potentially confer a harmful effect on the kidneys are unknown.
Two other metabolites, O-methylcatechol sulfate and 3-methyl catechol sulfate, were positively associated with both coffee consumption and higher risk for incident CKD. These two metabolites are both xenobiotics belonging to the benzoate metabolism pathway. Benzoate is a downstream metabolite of chlorogenic acids present in coffee. Chlorogenic acids have been hypothesized to be a potential contributor to the observed association between coffee consumption and lower kidney disease risk, as they may inhibit glucose absorption, reduce oxidative stress, and reduce liver glucose output, thereby lowering the risk of diabetic nephropathy (5,31–35). Furthermore, chlorogenic acids, along with other chemical components within coffee, may protect the glomerular endothelium from oxidative stress and reduce both insulin resistance and systemic inflammation (36,37). However, the direction of association of both metabolites with coffee and incident CKD indicates that these metabolites may reflect potentially harmful aspects of the coffee on kidney health. Coffee preparation methods and the temperature and duration of coffee bean roasting, in particular, influence the presence of chlorogenic acids in coffee and may affect the health implications of coffee consumption.
All three metabolites—glycochenodeoxycholate, O-methylcatechol sulfate, and 3-methyl catechol sulfate—that were associated with coffee and incident CKD were also significantly associated with cigarette smoking in this study. It is known that coffee consumption is associated with cigarette smoking (38). Although we controlled for smoking status in our study, because of residual confounding, levels of these metabolites may in part be influenced by smoking status.
Although no other studies have found these three specific metabolites to also be associated with CKD, there have been a number of other studies that have identified serum metabolites associated with CKD (39,40). Of note, xanthine and 1-methylxanthine concentrations were associated with prevalent CKD in a case-control study in China, both of which belong to the xanthine metabolism pathway that has been consistently associated with coffee consumption (19,24–26,41). However, both metabolites were not associated with incident CKD in this analysis. Another community-based cohort of 1104 older adults in Germany found spermidine to be associated with incident CKD (42). However, the study only analyzed 140 serum metabolites and may not have included the three metabolites found to be associated with coffee and incident CKD in this study. Spermidine was not available in this analysis.
This study had several strengths. We analyzed data from a large study population with continuous surveillance for incident CKD over 30+ years in our discovery analysis. We replicated the cross-sectional analysis of coffee and metabolites in an independent sample (i.e., BHS). Additionally, our discovery study population was recruited from a variety of locations, so it may be more representative of the general US population than a study with participants from a single location. We adjusted for a large number of potential covariates to account for confounding. We used a stringent procedure for determining statistical significance to account for multiple comparisons and minimize the likelihood of false-positive findings.
Our study also had a number of limitations. We used baseline data on coffee consumption, metabolites, and covariates, and as such, our analysis did not capture the time-varying nature of these variables in the prospective analysis of incident CKD. Many factors affect the metabolome, and although we adjusted for a wide range of covariates, there is still potential for unmeasured confounders. There are also potential reporting biases in our study, as coffee consumption and many of the covariates were self-reported through questionnaires. Despite the two samples being selected from the same underlying study population (the ARIC study), there were differences between the two samples (i.e., sample 1 consisted entirely of Black participants from Jackson, Mississippi). Because of the lack of incident CKD data in BHS, we were unable to replicate the prospective association between metabolites and incident CKD. Using untargeted metabolomics for biomarker discovery optimizes the opportunity for novel findings but limits the ability to replicate across independent study populations.
In conclusion, we found 41 unique metabolites associated with coffee consumption in a meta-analysis of two subsamples of ARIC and replicated the findings in terms of direction and statistical significance for 20 of these metabolites among BHS participants. Some of these serum metabolites have been previously found to be associated with coffee consumption in other populations and are promising objective, quantifiable biomarkers of coffee intake. We also found three metabolites that were associated with coffee consumption and incident CKD: glycochenodeoxycholate, O-methylcatechol sulfate, and 3-methyl catechol sulfate. With replication of our findings and more research on the metabolic underpinnings of the coffee-kidney relationship, these metabolites may represent pathophysiologic processes that are relevant for preventing kidney disease through diet modification.
Disclosures
E. Boerwinkle reports ownership interest in Codified Genomics. J. Coresh reports consultancy agreements with Healthy.io, Kaleido, and Ultragenyx; ownership interest in Healthy.io; receiving research funding from the National Institutes of Health and the National Kidney Foundation (NKF; which receives industry support); and serving as a scientific advisor or member of Healthy.io and NKF. M.E. Grams reports receiving honoraria from academic institutions for giving grand rounds and American Diabetes Association for reviewing abstracts; serving as a scientific advisor or member of American Journal of Kidney Diseases, CJASN, the JASN Editorial Fellowship Committee, the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes Executive Committee, the NKF Scientific Advisory Board, and the United States Renal Data System Scientific Advisory Board; and other interests/relationships with NKF, which receives funding from Abbvie, Relypsa, and Thrasos. E.A. Hu reports employment with and ownership interest in Foodsmart. C.R. Parikh reports consultancy agreements with Genfit Biopharmaceutical Company and Novartis; is a member of the advisory board of and owns equity in RenalytixAI; reports receiving research funding from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute and the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; and reports serving as a scientific advisor or member of Genfit Biopharmaceutical Company and Renalytix. C.M. Rebholz reports serving as an editorial board member for Diabetes Care. All remaining authors have nothing to disclose.
Funding
The ARIC study has been funded in whole or in part with federal funds from National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services contracts HHSN268201700001l, HHSN26821700002l, HHSN268201700003l, HHSN268201700004l, and HHSN268201700005l. Metabolomics measurements were sponsored by National Human Genome Research Institute grant 3U01HG004402-02S1. BHS was supported by National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging awards R01AG041200 and R21AG051914. Research reported in this publication was partially supported by National Institutes of Health, National Institute of General Medical Sciences award P20GM109036. This work was also supported by National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute grant F30HL147486. C.R. Parikh is supported by National Institutes of Health grants R01HL085757, UH3DK114866, U01DK106962, and R01DK093770. C.M. Rebholz is supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute grants R56 HL153178 and R21 HL143089 and National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases grants K01 DK107782 and R03 DK128386.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the staff and participants of the ARIC study and BHS for their important contributions.
Some of the data reported have been supplied by the United States Renal Data System registry.
The interpretation and reporting of these data are the responsibility of the authors and in no way should be seen as official policy or interpretation of the US Government. Funders had no role in the study design, collection, analysis, and interpretation of these data; writing the report; and the decision to submit the report.
Supplemental Material
This article contains the following supplemental material online at http://cjasn.asnjournals.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.2215/CJN.05520421/-/DCSupplemental.
Supplemental Material. Methods: metabolomic profiling, covariates, and references.
Supplemental Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study participants according to categories of coffee consumption.
Supplemental Table 2. Metabolites associated with coffee intake in sample 1 of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study.
Supplemental Table 3. Metabolites associated with coffee intake in sample 2 of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study.
Supplemental Table 4. Association between coffee consumption categories and coffee-associated metabolites in ARIC.
Supplemental Table 5. Statistically significant associations between coffee- and CKD-associated metabolites and other lifestyle/dietary factors in ARIC.
References
1. Ko GJ, Obi Y, Tortorici AR, Kalantar-Zadeh K: Dietary protein intake and chronic kidney disease. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 20: 77–85, 2017
2. Hariharan D, Vellanki K, Kramer H: The western diet and chronic kidney disease. Curr Hypertens Rep 17: 16, 2015
3. Rebholz CM, Crews DC, Grams ME, Steffen LM, Levey AS, Miller 3rd ER, Appel LJ, Coresh J: DASH (Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension) diet and risk of subsequent kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis 68: 853–861, 2016
4. Hu EA, Anderson CAM, Crews DC, Mills KT, He J, Shou H, Taliercio JJ, Mohanty MJ, Bhat Z, Coresh J, Appel LJ, Rebholz CM, et al.; CRIC Study Investigator: A healthy beverage score and risk of chronic kidney disease progression, incident cardiovascular disease, and all-cause mortality in the chronic renal insufficiency cohort. Curr Dev Nutr 4: nzaa088, 2020
5. Hu EA, Selvin E, Grams ME, Steffen LM, Coresh J, Rebholz CM: Coffee consumption and incident kidney disease: Results from the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study. Am J Kidney Dis 72: 214–222, 2018
6. Kennedy OJ, Roderick P, Poole R, Parkes J: Coffee and kidney disease. Int J Clin Pract 71: e12980, 2017
7. Jhee JH, Nam KH, An SY, Cha M-U, Lee M, Park S, Kim H, Yun HR, Kee YK, Park JT, Chang T-I, Kang EW, Yoo T-H, Kang S-W, Han SH: Effects of coffee intake on incident chronic kidney disease: A community-based prospective cohort study. Am J Med 131: 1482–1490.e3, 2018
8. Guasch-Ferré M, Bhupathiraju SN, Hu FB: Use of metabolomics in improving assessment of dietary intake. Clin Chem 64: 82–98, 2018
9. Tzoulaki I, Ebbels TMD, Valdes A, Elliott P, Ioannidis JPA: Design and analysis of metabolomics studies in epidemiologic research: A primer on -omic technologies. Am J Epidemiol 180: 129–139, 2014
10. The ARIC investigators: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study: Design and objectives. The ARIC investigators. Am J Epidemiol 129: 687–702, 1989
11. Berenson GS; Bogalusa Heart Study Investigators: Bogalusa Heart Study: A long-term community study of a rural biracial (black/white) population. Am J Med Sci 322: 293–300, 2001
12. Nierenberg JL, He J, Li C, Gu X, Shi M, Razavi AC, Mi X, Li S, Bazzano LA, Anderson AH, He H, Chen W, Kinchen JM, Rebholz CM, Coresh J, Levey AS, Inker LA, Shlipak M, Kelly TN: Novel associations between blood metabolites and kidney function among Bogalusa Heart Study and Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis participants. Metabolomics 15: 149–143, 2019
13. Ford L, Kennedy AD, Goodman KD, Pappan KL, Evans AM, Miller LAD, Wulff JE, Wiggs BR, Lennon JJ, Elsea S, Toal DR: Precision of a clinical metabolomics profiling platform for use in the identification of inborn errors of metabolism. J Appl Lab Med 5: 342–356, 2020
14. Evans AM, DeHaven CD, Barrett T, Mitchell M, Milgram E: Integrated, nontargeted ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry platform for the identification and relative quantification of the small-molecule complement of biological systems. Anal Chem 81: 6656–6667, 2009
15. Rockett HR, Breitenbach M, Frazier AL, Witschi J, Wolf AM, Field AE, Colditz GA: Validation of a youth/adolescent food frequency questionnaire. Prev Med 26: 808–816, 1997
16. Yoo S, Nicklas T, Baranowski T, Zakeri IF, Yang SJ, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS: Comparison of dietary intakes associated with metabolic syndrome risk factors in young adults: The Bogalusa Heart Study. Am J Clin Nutr 80: 841–848, 2004
17. Grams ME, Rebholz CM, McMahon B, Whelton S, Ballew SH, Selvin E, Wruck L, Coresh J: Identification of incident CKD stage 3 in research studies. Am J Kidney Dis 64: 214–221, 2014
18. Kot M, Daniel WA: The relative contribution of human cytochrome P450 isoforms to the four caffeine oxidation pathways: An in vitro comparative study with cDNA-expressed P450s including CYP2C isoforms. Biochem Pharmacol 76: 543–551, 2008
19. Guertin KA, Loftfield E, Boca SM, Sampson JN, Moore SC, Xiao Q, Huang WY, Xiong X, Freedman ND, Cross AJ, Sinha R: Serum biomarkers of habitual coffee consumption may provide insight into the mechanism underlying the association between coffee consumption and colorectal cancer. Am J Clin Nutr 101: 1000–1011, 2015
20. Williamson G, Clifford MN: Colonic metabolites of berry polyphenols: The missing link to biological activity? Br J Nutr 104: S48–S66, 2010
21. Selma MV, Espín JC, Tomás-Barberán FA: Interaction between phenolics and gut microbiota: Role in human health. J Agric Food Chem 57: 6485–6501, 2009
22. Ludwig IA, Paz de Peña M, Concepción C, Alan C: Catabolism of coffee chlorogenic acids by human colonic microbiota. Biofactors 39: 623–632, 2013
23. Rebholz CM, Surapaneni A, Levey AS, Sarnak MJ, Inker LA, Appel LJ, Coresh J, Grams ME: The serum metabolome identifies biomarkers of dietary acid load in 2 studies of adults with chronic kidney disease. J Nutr 149: 578–585, 2019
24. Cornelis MC, Erlund I, Michelotti GA, Herder C, Westerhuis JA, Tuomilehto J: Metabolomic response to coffee consumption: Application to a three-stage clinical trial. J Intern Med 283: 544–557, 2018
25. Hang D, Zeleznik OA, He X, Guasch-Ferre M, Jiang X, Li J, Liang L, Eliassen AH, Clish CB, Chan AT, Hu Z, Shen H, Wilson KM, Mucci LA, Sun Q, Hu FB, Willett WC, Giovannucci EL, Song M: Metabolomic signatures of long-term coffee consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes in women. Diabetes Care 43: 2588–2596, 2020
26. Zheng Y, Yu B, Alexander D, Steffen LM, Boerwinkle E: Human metabolome associates with dietary intake habits among African Americans in the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Am J Epidemiol 179: 1424–1433, 2014
27. Chiang JY: Bile acids: Regulation of synthesis. J Lipid Res 50: 1955–1966, 2009
28. Staley C, Weingarden AR, Khoruts A, Sadowsky MJ: Interaction of gut microbiota with bile acid metabolism and its influence on disease states. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 101: 47–64, 2017
29. Mudaliar S, Henry RR, Sanyal AJ, Morrow L, Marschall HU, Kipnes M, Adorini L, Sciacca CI, Clopton P, Castelloe E, Dillon P, Pruzanski M, Shapiro D: Efficacy and safety of the farnesoid X receptor agonist obeticholic acid in patients with type 2 diabetes and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology 145: 574–582.e1, 2013
30. Loftfield E, Rothwell JA, Sinha R, Keski-Rahkonen P, Robinot N, Albanes D, Weinstein SJ, Derkach A, Sampson J, Scalbert A, Freedman ND: Prospective investigation of serum metabolites, coffee drinking, liver cancer incidence, and liver disease mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst 112: 286–294, 2020
31. Ding M, Satija A, Bhupathiraju SN, Hu Y, Sun Q, Han J, Lopez-Garcia E, Willett W, van Dam RM, Hu FB: Association of coffee consumption with total and cause-specific mortality in 3 large prospective cohorts. Circulation 132: 2305–2315, 2015
32. Kim BH, Park YS, Noh HM, Sung JS, Lee JK: Association between coffee consumption and renal impairment in Korean women with and without diabetes: Analysis of the fourth Korea national health and nutrition examination survey in 2008. Korean J Fam Med 34: 265–271, 2013
33. Svilaas A, Sakhi AK, Andersen LF, Svilaas T, StröM EC, Jacobs DR, Ose L, Blomhoff R: Intakes of antioxidants in coffee, wine, and vegetables are correlated with plasma carotenoids in humans. J Nutr 134: 562–567, 2004
34. Arion WJ, Canfield WK, Ramos FC: Chlorogenic acid and hydroxynitrobenzaldehyde: New inhibitors of hepatic glucose 6-phosphatase. Arch Biochem Biophys 339: 315–322, 1997
35. van Dam RM, Hu FB: Coffee consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review. JAMA 294: 97–104, 2005
36. Wijarnpreecha K, Thongprayoon C, Thamcharoen N, Panjawatanan P, Cheungpasitporn W: Association of coffee consumption and chronic kidney disease: A meta-analysis. Int J Clin Pract 71: e12919, 2017
37. Butt MS, Sultan MT: Coffee and its consumption: Benefits and risks. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 51: 363–373, 2011
38. Ware JJ, Tanner JA, Taylor AE, Bin Z, Haycock P, Bowden J, Rogers PJ, Davey Smith G, Tyndale RF, Munafò MR: Does coffee consumption impact on heaviness of smoking? Addiction 112: 1842–1853, 2017
39. Kalantari S, Nafar M: An update of urine and blood metabolomics in chronic kidney disease. Biomarkers Med 13: 577–597, 2019
40. Davies R: The metabolomic quest for a biomarker in chronic kidney disease. Clin Kidney J 11: 694–703, 2018
41. Chen DQ, Cao G, Chen H, Liu D, Su W, Yu X-Y, Vaziri ND, Liu X-H, Bai X, Zhang L, Zhao Y-Y: Gene and protein expressions and metabolomics exhibit activated redox signaling and Wnt/beta-catenin pathway are associated with metabolite dysfunction in patients with chronic kidney disease. Redox Biol 12: 505–521, 2017
42. Goek ON, Prehn C, Sekula P, Römisch-Margl W, Döring A, Gieger C, Heier M, Koenig W, Wang-Sattler R, Illig T, Suhre K, Adamski J, Köttgen A, Meisinger C: Metabolites associate with kidney function decline and incident chronic kidney disease in the general population. Nephrol Dial Transplant 28: 2131–2138, 2013