Introduction
Growth failure remains one of the major long-term challenges in the management of childhood-onset ESRD. Poor growth in children with ESRD is multifactorial and influenced by nutritional, metabolic, and hormonal alterations (1 – 3 ) and has been associated with an increased risk of hospitalization and death (4 ). Short stature has major consequences for quality of life and self-esteem; more than one third of young adults with childhood-onset ESRD report to be dissatisfied with their body height (5 ). Short adult height is associated with major shortcomings in social and work life such as a lower level of education, a lower level of employment and a lower chance of being married (6 ). Achieving a normal final height is therefore a crucial issue for children on renal replacement therapy (RRT). Improvements in the management of CKD-related growth failure have led to better height attainment at the time of renal transplantation but following transplantation, growth is generally not sufficient to compensate for the deficit that has been acquired before transplantation (7 , 8 ).
In children, height is reported in SD scores (SDS) from the general population. In recent years, several single-center reports have specifically addressed final height after transplantation in childhood (9 – 13 ). The proportion of patients who achieved a final height within the normal range ranged from 47% to 75%, which appears considerably improved over early reports in which normal adult height was achieved in only 23%–38% (14 , 15 ). Growth is a marker of quality of care in childhood CKD and ESRD. Through improvement in the management of children with kidney diseases over decades, growth failure and therefore adult short stature seem to be decreasing in this population. In this study, we used the population-based dataset of the European Society for Pediatric Nephrology/European Renal Association and European Dialysis and Transplant Association (ESPN/ERA-EDTA) registry to describe the final height distribution of patients who started RRT while in pediatric care in Europe, to analyze trends over time and to identify potential determinants of final height SDS.
Methods
Data Collection
This study used data recorded in the ESPN/ERA-EDTA Registry. Within the registry, clinical data are collected annually as reported elsewhere (16 , 17 ). Data obtained for the purpose of this study included date of birth, sex, primary renal disease, date of start of RRT, treatment modality (hemodialysis [HD], peritoneal dialysis [PD], or transplantation) and dates of change in treatment modality, donor source, height at start of RRT and at last follow-up. We included patients who started RRT at <19 years of age and reached documented final height between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 2011. This included data from the following 20 countries and periods of reaching final height: Belarus (2010), Czech Republic (2007–2010), Estonia (2010), Finland (1992–2009), France (2004–2010), Greece (2010–2011), Hungary (2010–2011), Iceland (2009), Italy (1990–2011), Lithuania (2010–2011), the Netherlands (2008–2009), Norway (2008–2010), Poland (1991–2011), Portugal (2008–2010), Serbia (1997–2011), Slovakia (2010), Slovenia (2010), Spain (1990–2011), Switzerland (1990–2009), and the United Kingdom (1992–2010).
Definition of Variables
Height SDS was calculated according to recent national growth charts whenever available (18 – 25 ), or to newly developed northern and southern European growth charts (26 ) for countries where recent growth reference data are unavailable. Height SDS values were calculated by the following equation:
Growth retardation was defined by a height SDS < –1.88 (i.e. , the third percentile for height) and was categorized as moderate (–1.88 > SDS >–3.0) or severe (<–3.0 SDS). Final height was defined as the last height measurement available after 18 years of age, or, when not available, as the last height measurement when growth velocity per year was below 1 cm in boys >17 years old and girls >16 years old. Height at start of RRT was defined as first height available within 3 months after start of RRT or within 6 weeks for those who started RRT before 2 years of age.
To study the effect of height SDS change from start of RRT to final height measurement, we included only children with a potential for catch-up growth (i.e. , those <16 years old in this study). Time on RRT was defined as the time interval between start of RRT and either the last available height measurement or the age of 19, whichever occurred first. Renal diseases were grouped by primary renal disease code for pediatric patients, according to the ERA-EDTA Registry coding system (27 ).
Statistical Analyses
Patient characteristics are presented as median and interquartile range (IQR) for continuous variables and percentages for categorical variables. For comparison over time, only patients from countries with a complete follow-up of patients reaching final height over the last two decades were included.
To investigate the relationship between final height SDS and potential determinants, univariable and multivariable linear regression analysis were used. Adjustments were made for possible confounders, which were chosen on the basis of a priori considerations and criteria for confounding (28 ). Adjusted mean final height SDS was recalculated using the distribution in all cases. Variables included in adjusted analyses were age at start of RRT (0 to <2 years, 2 to <5 years, 5 to <13 years, and ≥13 years), period of start of RRT by decade (<1990, 1990–1999, 2000–2010), country, sex, primary renal disease category, first modality of RRT (HD first, PD first or transplantation first), percentage of lifetime and on RRT time on transplantation, and height SDS at start of RRT. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS software, version 9.2.
Results
Baseline Characteristics
Data were obtained from 1612 children receiving RRT from 20 countries who reached adult height between 1990 and 2011. Median age at start of RRT was 12.8 years, 53.8% of patients were male, and median age at final height measurement was 19.0 years (Table 1 ). Congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT) were the most frequent underlying disease (40.4%), followed by glomerulonephritides (17.9%). Similar proportions of children received PD (41.1%) and HD (41.4%) as initial RRT modality, whereas 17.5% started with a preemptive renal transplantation. Median time on RRT was 5.7 years (IQR, 2.9–9.4 years). At the time of final height measurement, 73.7% of patients had a functioning renal allograft, 17.2% were on HD, and 9.1% on PD (Table 1 ).
Table 1: Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population (n =1612)
Final Height and Prevalence of Short Stature
Boys reached a median final height of 168 cm (IQR, 161–173 cm); median final height SDS was –1.57 (IQR, −2.56 to −0.81). Median final height in girls was 155 cm (IQR, 149–161 cm); median final height SDS for girls was –1.67 (IQR, −2.70 to −0.76). The difference between boys and girls was not significant (P =0.72). Overall, the median final height SDS was –1.65 (IQR, −2.64 to −0.78); 57.4% had attained an adult height within the normal range, whereas 23.5% exhibited moderate (−1.88 > SDS >−3.0) and 19.1% severe (<−3 SDS) adult height deficits. At the time of final height measurement, body mass index values were within the normal range in most patients, with a median of 21.2 (IQR, 19.2–24.0) in boys and 21.2 (IQR, 19.0–24.4) in girls.
Longitudinal Trends in Final Height
In the countries with complete follow-up information in the period 1990–2011 (n =981 patients), the overall proportion of patients with an adult height in the normal range rose from 49.6% in children who reached adulthood in 1990–1995 (median final height, −1.90 SDS) to 62.2% among those reaching adulthood in 2006–2011 (median final height, –1.41 SDS) (P =0.05) (Figure 1 ). Final height SDS improved significantly in both boys (from a median of –1.87 in 1990–1995 to −1.32 in 2006–2011) and girls (from a median of –2.15 in 1990–1995 to –1.67 in 2006–2011). The trend in final height change became more significant (from –2.06 in 1990–1995 to −1.33 SDS in 2006–2011) after adjustment for age at start of RRT and PRD.
Figure 1: Distribution of height SDS by period of reaching adulthood (n=1612). SDS, SD score.
Furthermore, the improvement over time became clearer when stratifying by age and period of start of RRT. Adjusted final height increased significantly from −1.93 SDS (IQR, −2.13 to −1.70) in children who started RRT before 1990, to −1.78 (IQR, −2.01 to −1.53) in children starting RRT in 1990–1999, and to −1.61 (IQR, −1.81 to −1.34) in those commencing RRT after 1999 (P <0.001) and the improvement in final height over time was seen within all categories of age at RRT start (Figure 2 ).
Figure 2: Changes in final height SD score (SDS) over time according to age and period of start of renal replacement therapy (RRT) (n=981). The horizontal line in the middle of the box represents the median; the bottom and top of the box represent the lower and upper quartiles, respectively; and the ends of the whiskers represent the 10th and the 90th percentiles.
A height measurement at start of RRT was available for 566 patients (58%) in patients from countries with complete follow-up information. The adjusted height SDS change by year spent on RRT from start of RRT to final height measurement did not significantly differ by the period of start of RRT. In the early period of RRT (before 1990), height SDS change was −0.04 per year on RRT (95% confidence interval [CI], −0.10 to 0.02 per year on RRT), whereas it was −0.11 per year on RRT (95% CI, −0.26 to −0.05 per year on RRT) in a more recent period of RRT (2001–2006). When we selected only patients who started RRT before 16 years of age (children with growth potential), there was a significant improvement over time in the change in height SDS from start of RRT to final height SDS (Figure 3 ). Although not significantly, height SDS at start of RRT improved over time; it was −1.65 in the early period of RRT and −1.32 upon starting RRT from 2001 to 2006 (P =0.37).
Figure 3: Mean yearly change in height SD score (SDS) from start of renal replacement therapy (RRT) to final height measurement by period of start of RRT (n=458). In patients who started RRT at age <16 years, the change in height SDS between start of RRT and final height SDS significantly improved (P =0.02). Analyses were adjusted for age at start of RRT.
Factors Associated with Final Height
Older age at start of RRT (i.e. , children ≥13 years of age at start of RRT versus other age categories), a more recent period of start of RRT (2000–2010 and 1990–1999 versus before 1990), the percentages of lifetime on transplantation and RRT time on transplantation, and a higher height SDS at time of RRT start were independently associated with a significantly higher adjusted final height SDS (Tables 2 and 3 ). For 49.4% of the children commencing RRT before age 13 years, the final height SDS was below −1.88. Furthermore, after adjustment for sex, age, and period of start of RRT, patients with CAKUT were significantly shorter at final height than those with GN, cystic kidney diseases, hereditary nephropathy, hemolytic-uremic syndrome, vasculitis, and miscellaneous causes, while patients with metabolic disorders were significantly shorter than those with CAKUT (Table 2 ). In the subgroup of patients with cystinosis or oxalosis (n =66), the adjusted final height SDS was −2.54 (IQR, −2.91 to −2.16).
Table 2: Factors associated with final height SD score: categorical variables (n =1612)
Table 3: Factors associated with final height SD score: continuous variables (n =1612)
Preemptive transplantation as initial RRT modality was associated with a significantly better adult height SDS as compared with PD and HD, but after adjustment for time on transplantation no significant differences between initial treatment modalities were found (Table 2 ).
Discussion
This Europe-wide adult height study, the first of its kind since early reports by the ERA-EDTA Registry (29 ), demonstrates the size of the problem of growth failure in children with ESRD. Around 50% of the children requiring RRT before their 13th birthday grew to a final height below the third percentile. A fifth of patients with childhood-onset ESRD attained an adult height more than 3 SDs below the mean, a degree of stunting highly likely to affect social integration and quality of life (5 , 6 , 30 ). These growth outcomes are in keeping with data of the NAPRTCS registry (8 ); the slightly better mean adult height SDS figures in the North American Registry (−1.46 versus −1.65 in this study) are largely explained by differences in the reference datasets (26 ), whereas absolute heights were almost identical to or even slightly better than those in the NAPRTCS (girls, 154 cm; boys, 166 cm) and our registry (girls, 155 cm; boys, 168 cm).
At first glance the analysis of longitudinal trends in height outcomes appears disappointing, with a global height gain of 0.49 SDS (i.e. , 2.5 cm) between the patients attaining adult height before 1995 and those who did after 2005. However, this modest improvement was clearly related to changes in population characteristics, as an increasing fraction of children with early-onset ESRD due to severe renal malformations or multisystem disease was admitted to pediatric RRT programs and survived to adulthood over time. Also, patients with congenital malformations and inherited metabolic disorders achieved a significantly smaller adult height than patients with disorders typically manifesting in later childhood. After adjustment for the age at RRT start and primary renal diagnosis, a more significant 0.73 SDS increase in adult height over time became apparent.
Multivariable analysis revealed several factors related to the timing and choice of RRT that appear critical for final height outcomes in childhood-onset ESRD. The most important predictor of an acceptable final height was a late need for RRT during the pediatric age. However, height SDS did not change significantly between onset of RRT and final measurement. The overall effect of RRT on final height was neutral throughout the observation period, among the overall population. Moreover, height at start of RRT increased by 0.4 SDS from the early period to the more recent years of starting RRT. This would suggest that the observed moderate improvement of final height over time was mainly due to better growth management during the pre-ESRD period and that any strategies to prevent or correct CKD-associated growth failure (31 – 34 ) are most likely to be effective before ESRD has occurred. However, when we analyzed only patients with a greater “growth potential” on RRT, namely only the patients <16 years of age at start of RRT, the change between height at start and final height measurement significantly improved over time (Figure 3 ). This finding that height SDS no longer declines after RRT also suggests overall improvement in the care of ESRD over the years.
Regarding the choice of RRT once required, the fraction of childhood lifetime spent on dialysis adversely predicted final height. This finding is consistent with reported longitudinal data on growth on dialysis demonstrating a decrease in height SDS over time (1 , 8 ), and the negative effect of the fractional lifetime spent on dialysis on adult height previously noted in patients receiving long-term recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) therapy (34 ). Conversely, the time spent with a functioning allograft was positively associated with final height outcome.
In our study, no data on dose and duration of rhGH were available to estimate its effect on final height, but we found that only a small proportion of the population (approximately 20%) has been treated by rhGH while receiving RRT. Although previous reports suggested a positive effect of rhGH on final height in children with CKD (34 , 35 ) and support its use during RRT, it is noteworthy that the currently approved European indication for the drug is limited to patients undergoing dialysis and allograft recipients with impaired GFR.
Further research will be required to develop optimization strategies that will facilitate better growth outcomes in this challenging population.
This study has several limitations. The lack of detailed data on treatments such as steroids, supplemental feeding, and rhGH precluded an assessment of the relative effect of these therapies on final height. We also did not have sufficient information on ethnicity, syndromic short stature, or comorbid conditions that influence growth and final height (36 ), nor did we have data on pubertal status or mid-parental height. Also, one might imagine that children who died were more likely to be shorter than those who survived and reached final height (4 ). Finally, although adult height has been assessed at an average age of 19 years, some patients might not have reached their definite final height at last measurement. Indeed, delayed puberty has been associated with late growth after age 18 in children with ESRD (11 , 37 ). This finding, however, has not been reported in more recent studies reporting normal puberty after transplantation (38 ). The strengths of the study include the large data set; the long-term follow-up, including complete coverage of sequential RRT modalities; and the rather detailed patient characterization, all of which allow a comprehensive analysis of potential effectors of final height. Even if we cannot fully ascertain case completeness in the ESPN/ERA-EDTA Registry, most national registries have specific procedures ensuring data quality and coverage.
In conclusion, although more and more challenging pediatric patients have been accepted into RRT programs, including neonates and children with severe comorbid conditions, final height has consistently improved over the years. New approaches are needed to improve longitudinal growth and adult height prognosis after childhood-onset ESRD.
Disclosures
None.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the patients, their parents, and the staff of all the dialysis and transplant units who have contributed data via their national registries and contact persons.
We also would like to thank R. Coppo and D. Haffner for being members of the ESPN/ERA-EDTA Registry Committee; D. Shitza, R. Kramar, R. Oberbauer, S. Baiko, A. Sukalo, K. van Hoeck, F. Collart, J.M. des Grottes, D. Pokrajac, D. Roussinov, D. Batinić, J. Savivek, T. Seeman, K. Vondrak, J. Heaf, U. Toots, P. Finne, C. Grönhagen-Riska, C. Couchoud, M. Lassale, E. Sahpazova, G. Gernsdorf, C. Barth, C. Scholz, B. Tönshoff, L. Plotnicki, G.A. Ioannidis, A. Kapogiannis, N. Printza, C. Stefanidis, S. Túri, L. Szabó, T. Szabó, E. Kis, R. Palsson, V. Edvardsson, B. Gianoglio, T. De Palo, C. Pecoraro, S. Picca, S. Testa, E. Vidal, Y. Frishberg, N. Meislish, A. Jankauskiene, B. Pundziene, S. Pavićević, T. Leivestad, D. Brackman, A. Zurowska, I. Zagozdzon, C. Mota, M. Almeida, C. Afonso, G. Mircescu, L. Garneata, E.A. Molchanova, N.A. Tomilina, B.T. Bikbov, A. Peco-Antic, M. Kostic, S. Puric, B. Spasojevic-Dimitrijeva, D. Paripovic, L. Podracka, G. Kolvek, J. Buturovic-Ponikvar, G. Novljan, A. Alonso Melgar; the Spanish Pediatric Registry, S. Schön, J.K.G. Prütz, A. Seeberger, L. Backmän, M. Herthelius, B. Rippe, S. Rossi, C.E. Kuenhi, E. Maurer, B. Schnarwyler, G. Laube, A. Hoitsma, A. Hemke; all centers participating in the RICHQ-study, and R. Topaloglu, A. Duzova, O. Soylemezoglu, D. Ivanov, T. Feest, C. Inward, for contributing data to the ESPN/ERA-EDTA Registry.
The ESPN/ERA-EDTA registry is funded by the European Society for Pediatric Nephrology (ESPN), the European Renal Association and European Dialysis and Transplant Association (ERA-EDTA), and the NephroQUEST project. The NephroQUEST project has received funding from the European Union in the framework of the Public Health Program (project number 2006114). J.H. was supported by an ERA-EDTA QUEST initiative research fund and received travel assistance from Astellas Pharma, Fresenius Medical Care, Pfizer, and Sandoz. Amgen has provided an unrestricted educational grant to assist the ESPN in the financial support of the Registry.
Published online ahead of print. Publication date available at www.cjasn.org .
This article contains supplemental material online at http://cjasn.asnjournals.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.2215/CJN.00890113/-/DCSupplemental .
References
1. Rees L, Azocar M, Borzych D, Watson AR, Büscher A, Edefonti A, Bilge I, Askenazi D, Leozappa G, Gonzales C, van Hoeck K, Secker D, Zurowska A, Rönnholm K, Bouts AH, Stewart H, Ariceta G, Ranchin B, Warady BA, Schaefer FInternational Pediatric Peritoneal Dialysis Network (IPPN) registry: Growth in very young children undergoing chronic peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 22: 2303–2312, 2011
2. Schaefer F, Klaus G, Mehls OMid-European Pediatric Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group: Peritoneal transport properties and dialysis dose affect growth and nutritional status in children on chronic peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 10: 1786–1792, 1999
3. Schaefer F, Veldhuis JD, Stanhope R, Jones J, Schärer K: Alterations in growth hormone secretion and clearance in peripubertal boys with chronic renal failure and after renal transplantation. Cooperative Study Group of Pubertal development in Chronic Renal Failure. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 78: 1298–1306, 1994
4. Furth SL, Hwang W, Yang C, Neu AM, Fivush BA, Powe NR: Growth failure, risk of hospitalization and death for children with end-stage renal disease. Pediatr Nephrol 17: 450–455, 2002
5. Rosenkranz J, Reichwald-Klugger E, Oh J, Turzer M, Mehls O, Schaefer F: Psychosocial rehabilitation and satisfaction with life in adults with childhood-onset of end-stage renal disease. Pediatr Nephrol 20: 1288–1294, 2005
6. Broyer M, Le Bihan C, Charbit M, Guest G, Tete MJ, Gagnadoux MF, Niaudet P: Long-term social outcome of children after kidney transplantation. Transplantation 77: 1033–1037, 2004
7. Harambat J, Cochat P: Growth after renal transplantation. Pediatr Nephrol 24: 1297–1306, 2009
8. North American Renal Trials and Collaborative Studies: 2008 Annual Transplant Report, Rockville, MD, EMMES Corporation, 2008
9. Englund MS, Tydén G, Wikstad I, Berg UB: Growth impairment at renal transplantation—a determinant of growth and final height. Pediatr Transplant 7: 192–199, 2003
10. Ninik A, McTaggart SJ, Gulati S, Powell HR, Jones CL, Walker RG: Factors influencing growth and final height after renal transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 6: 219–223, 2002
11. Nissel R, Brázda I, Feneberg R, Wigger M, Greiner C, Querfeld U, Haffner D: Effect of renal transplantation in childhood on longitudinal growth and adult height. Kidney Int 66: 792–800, 2004
12. Offner G, Latta K, Hoyer PF, Baum HJ, Ehrich JH, Pichlmayr R, Brodehl J: Kidney transplanted children come of age. Kidney Int 55: 1509–1517, 1999
13. Rodríguez-Soriano J, Vallo A, Quintela MJ, Málaga S, Loris C: Predictors of final adult height after renal transplantation during childhood: A single-center study. Nephron 86: 266–273, 2000
14. Potter D, Feduska N, Melzer J, Garovoy M, Hopper S, Duca R, Salvatierra O Jr: Twenty years of renal transplantation in children. Pediatrics 77: 465–470, 1986
15. Hokken-Koelega AC, van Zaal MA, van Bergen W, de Ridder MA, Stijnen T, Wolff ED, de Jong RC, Donckerwolcke RA, de Muinck Keizer-Schrama SM, Drop SL: Final height and its predictive factors after renal transplantation in childhood. Pediatr Res 36: 323–328, 1994
16. van Stralen KJ, Tizard EJ, Jager KJ, Schaefer F, Vondrak K, Groothoff JW, Podracká L, Holmberg C, Jankauskiené A, Lewis MA, van Damme-Lombaerts R, Mota C, Niaudet P, Novljan G, Peco-Antic A, Sahpazova E, Toots U, Verrina E: Determinants of eGFR at start of renal replacement therapy in paediatric patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 25: 3325–3332, 2010
17. Kramer AM, van Stralen KJ, Jager KJ, Schaefer F, Verrina E, Seeman T, Lewis MA, Boehm M, Simonetti GD, Novljan G, Groothoff JW: Demographics of blood pressure and hypertension in children on renal replacement therapy in Europe. Kidney Int 80: 1092–1098, 2011
18. Kobzová J, Vignerová J, Bláha P, Krejcovský L, Riedlová J: The 6th nationwide anthropological survey of children and adolescents in the Czech Republic in 2001. Cent Eur J Public Health 12: 126–130, 2004
19. Grünberg H, Adojaan B, Thetloff M: Growth and Growth Disorders Methodological Instructions for Evaluating Children's Physical Development, Tartu, Tartu Ülikool, 1998 [in Estonian with English abstract]
20. Carrascosa Lezcano A, Fernández García JM, Fernández Ramos C, Ferrández Longás A, López-Siguero JP, Sánchez González E, Sobradillo Ruiz B, Yeste Fernández DGrupo Colaborador Español: [Spanish cross-sectional growth study 2008. Part II. Height, weight and body mass index values from birth to adulthood]. An Pediatr (Barc) 68: 552–569, 2008
21. Chiotis D, Tsiftis G, Hatzisymeon M, Maniati-Christidi M, Dacou-Voutetakis A: Height and weight of children of Hellenic origin aged 0-18 years (2000-2001): Comparison with data collected during the period 1978-1979. Ann Clin Pediatr Unive Atheniensis 50: 136–155, 2003
22. Cacciari E, Milani S, Balsamo A, Spada E, Bona G, Cavallo L, Cerutti F, Gargantini L, Greggio N, Tonini G, Cicognani A: Italian cross-sectional growth charts for height, weight and BMI (2 to 20 yr). J Endocrinol Invest 29: 581–593, 2006
23. Tutkuvienë J: Body size indices for growth monitoring of Lithuanian children and adolescents: comparative study of height. Acta Medica Lituanica 12: 9–14, 2005
24. Fredriks AM, van Buuren S, Burgmeijer RJ, Meulmeester JF, Beuker RJ, Brugman E, Roede MJ, Verloove-Vanhorick SP, Wit JM: Continuing positive secular growth change in The Netherlands 1955-1997. Pediatr Res 47: 316–323, 2000
25. Júlíusson PB, Roelants M, Eide GE, Moster D, Juul A, Hauspie R, Waaler PE, Bjerknes R: [Growth references for Norwegian children]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 129: 281–286, 2009
26. Bonthuis M, van Stralen KJ, Verrina E, Edefonti A, Molchanova EA, Hokken-Koelega ACS, Schaefer F, Jager KJ: Use of national and international growth charts for studying height in European children: Development of up-to-date European height-for-age charts. PLoS ONE 7: e42506, 2012
27. Registry Annual Report ERA-EDTA 2009. Academic Medical Center, Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011
28. Jager KJ, Zoccali C, Macleod A, Dekker FW: Confounding: What it is and how to deal with it. Kidney Int 73: 256–260, 2008
29. Rizzoni G, Broyer M, Brunner FP, Brynger H, Challah S, Kramer P, Oulès R, Selwood NH, Wing AJ, Balás EA: Combined report on regular dialysis and transplantation of children in Europe, XIII, 1983. Proc Eur Dial Transplant Assoc Eur Ren Assoc 21: 66–95, 1985
30. Wheeler PG, Bresnahan K, Shephard BA, Lau J, Balk EM: Short stature and functional impairment: A systematic review. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 158: 236–243, 2004
31. Rees L, Mak RH: Nutrition and growth in children with chronic kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol 7: 615–623, 2011
32. Parekh RS, Flynn JT, Smoyer WE, Milne JL, Kershaw DB, Bunchman TE, Sedman AB: Improved growth in young children with severe chronic renal insufficiency who use specified nutritional therapy. J Am Soc Nephrol 12: 2418–2426, 2001
33. Bacchetta J, Harambat J, Cochat P, Salusky IB, Wesseling-Perry K: The consequences of chronic kidney disease on bone metabolism and growth in children. Nephrol Dial Transplant 27: 3063–3071, 2012
34. Haffner D, Schaefer F, Nissel R, Wühl E, Tönshoff B, Mehls OGerman Study Group for Growth Hormone Treatment in Chronic Renal Failure: Effect of growth hormone treatment on the adult height of children with chronic renal failure. N Engl J Med 343: 923–930, 2000
35. Nissel R, Lindberg A, Mehls O, Haffner DPfizer International Growth Database (KIGS) International Board: Factors predicting the near-final height in growth hormone-treated children and adolescents with chronic kidney disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93: 1359–1365, 2008
36. Mekahli D, Shaw V, Ledermann SE, Rees L: Long-term outcome of infants with severe chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 5: 10–17, 2010
37. Schaefer F, Seidel C, Binding A, Gasser T, Largo RH, Prader A, Schärer K: Pubertal growth in chronic renal failure. Pediatr Res 28: 5–10, 1990
38. Tainio J, Qvist E, Vehmas R, Jahnukainen K, Hölttä T, Valta H, Jahnukainen T, Jalanko H: Pubertal development is normal in adolescents after renal transplantation in childhood. Transplantation 92: 404–409, 2011