Introduction
Nephrolithiasis is a painful and costly medical condition that begins with solute supersaturation (SS), crystal formation, and aggregation, followed by retention in the collecting system and further growth. In adults, kidney stones are associated with hypertension and chronic kidney disease, as well as an increasing financial burden (1 – 5 ). Although relatively rare in the pediatric population, recent data regarding incidence (6 ), cost (5 ), and inpatient hospitalization rates (7 , 8 ) for children with kidney stones bring into sharp focus the need to gain a better understanding of the metabolic underpinnings as well as environmental contributors to pediatric nephrolithiasis so that we may improve on strategies for prevention.
Like many nephrologic conditions, there is a paucity of data on children compared with adults regarding nephrolithiasis. As a result, children are often evaluated and treated in a similar manner to adults with the same condition. The limited data available regarding pediatric nephrolithiasis suggest that there are, indeed, differences between pediatric and adult stone formers (SFs). This review summarizes the most recent findings regarding the epidemiology and metabolic risk factors associated with so-called idiopathic pediatric nephrolithiasis. I conclude with a brief discussion of potential contributing factors to the increase in pediatric kidney stone disease. Anatomic and genetic abnormalities, as well as other medical conditions that predispose children to nephrolithiasis, are not addressed in this review.
Epidemiology
Incidence
A large study incorporating a nationally representative sample suitable for defining the true incidence of nephrolithiasis in US children has not yet been done. Population-based data appropriate for defining incidence in pediatric patients are limited to studies done outside the United States (9 , 10 ) and one study that investigated state-wide data in South Carolina (6 ). It is unclear whether these data can be extrapolated to the general US pediatric population.
In South Carolina, data from all pediatric emergency department visits in the state with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes consistent with nephrolithiasis or urolithiasis was used to estimate incidence (6 ). The incidence of nephrolithiasis for children aged ≤18 years was found to be 18.5 per 100,000 children in 2007, an increase from 7.9 per 100,000 in 1996. Data from Iceland revealed an incidence of 5.6 per 100,000 children aged 0 to 18 years on the basis of 26 new diagnoses of nephrolithiasis during a 6-year period among a national population of approximately 78,000 children (9 ). A study from Japan using a questionnaire sent to 1218 hospitals to determine the number of new diagnoses of nephrolithiasis on the basis of either imaging findings or clinical determination by a urologist estimated the incidence of nephrolithiasis to be 17.7 per 100,000 males and 12.4 per 100,000 females aged 10 to 19 years (10 ).
True incidence data in the US adult population are also rare. A study from a single county in Minnesota used radiologic and clinical data maintained in the Rochester Epidemiology Project diagnostic index to determine an incidence rate of 101.8 per 100,000 adults but is limited by small population size (11 ). Two studies by Curhan and colleagues (12 , 13 ) used large questionnaire-based databases to extrapolate overall incidence rates for male and female adults and found them to be 306 and 95 per 100,000 person-years, respectively. Although none of these studies truly defines the incidence of nephrolithiasis in the pediatric or adult populations of the United States, we can conclude that adults have a higher risk for developing stone disease than do children. Although pediatric patients are still less likely to be afflicted with kidney stones than adults, the seeming increase in incidence is concerning.
Gender
On the basis of data from adult populations, nephrolithiasis affects men more than women (14 , 15 ). Pediatric nephrolithiasis, conversely, seems to be more common in girls on the basis of recent data. Interestingly, analysis of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data by Stamatelou et al. (15 ) revealed that the only adult age group in which the prevalence for nephrolithiasis was higher for women compared with men was 20 to 29 years, perhaps foreshadowing more recent data in pediatrics. In South Carolina, the male-to-female ratio is 1:1.4 for all children, and the discrepancy becomes more pronounced as children enter adolescence (Figure 1 ) (6 ). In research by Edvardsson et al. (9 ) among the Icelandic pediatric population, 58% of pediatric SFs were female. Analysis of data regarding children who were hospitalized for nephrolithiasis revealed that girls account for only 46% of all admissions to children's hospitals but 56% of hospitalizations for kidney stones (7 ). The authors calculated that female gender imposes a relative risk of 1.5 for hospitalization for nephrolithiasis. In a similar study, Routh et al. (8 ) revealed comparable data and also found female predominance to be increased in adolescence. In a study that included a review of the literature regarding gender prevalence in pediatric nephrolithiasis, Novak et al. (16 ) also concluded that girls were more commonly admitted to the hospital for nephrolithiasis, despite finding that only one of 10 previously published case series showed a female predominance of pediatric SFs.
Figure 1: Incidence of pediatric nephrolithiasis in South Carolina. In 2007, the incidence of nephrolithiasis for girls was 21.9
versus 15.3 for boys, which reflects a change from the similar incidence (7.7
versus 8.0) observed in 1996. Incidence is expressed as number of unique cases of nephrolithiasis per 100,000 children from each specific demographic (
6 ).
Race
Nephrolithiasis more commonly affects non-Hispanic white individuals as compared with non-Hispanic black individuals (15 , 17 ). This discrepancy seems to be true in the pediatric population as well (6 – 8 ). With regard to the Hispanic population, most studies (both adults and pediatric) have found that Hispanic individuals have a risk for nephrolithiasis that is higher than black individuals but not as high as for white individuals (7 , 8 , 14 , 15 ). In an intriguing exception, the study by Mente et al. (17 ) of Canadian SFs found that Latin American individuals had a higher risk for stone formation than white individuals, which may be due to the heterogeneity of Canada's Hispanic population compared with the US's mostly Mexican American Hispanic population.
Age
The risk for kidney stones increases with age in adults up to a peak risk in the 50s and 60s, although some data reflect the highest risk for women to be in the late 20s and 30s (11 , 15 , 18 ). Extrapolation to pediatrics would predict lower risk with younger ages, and recent data support this. During the 12-year period examined in our study, we found the lowest incidence in children aged 0 to 3 years (0.6 per 100,000) and a consistent increase through adolescence, when the overall incidence for children aged 14 to 18 years was 34.9 per 100,000 (6 ). Children aged 14 to 18 years had a 10.2-times greater risk for nephrolithiasis compared with children aged 0 to 13 years. Risk for hospitalization for nephrolithiasis follows the same pattern, with the highest risk in adolescents and a decreasing trend to the lowest risk among infants (7 ). Older children are also more likely to have ureteral stones, whereas younger children more commonly have renal stones (19 , 20 ). Regarding spontaneous passage of stones, age typically is not a predictive factor, but stone size, regardless of age, can predict likelihood of spontaneous passage, with stones >5 mm less likely to pass versus stones <5 mm (19 , 20 ).
Other Considerations
Presenting signs and symptoms of nephrolithiasis in the pediatric population are fairly heterogeneous. Pain is a more common presenting symptom in older children and is present in 47% to 80% of children with nephrolithiasis (21 – 24 ). Thirty-two percent to 55% of children with nephrolithiasis present with gross hematuria (21 , 23 ). In a study from their experience in a single emergency department, Persaud et al. (24 ) found that the strongest predictors for finding kidney stones on unenhanced computed tomography scans were history of previous stones, history of vomiting, and blood on urinalysis performed during the emergency department visit. They found no correlation between risk for kidney stones and history of hematuria or positive family history for stones. A history of fever strongly predicted no nephrolithiasis on computed tomography.
With regard to geographic distribution of nephrolithiasis, adults living in the southeastern United States have the highest prevalence of kidney stone disease (25 ), but no such study has been performed of children. There are no data from the United States regarding risk for kidney stones in rural versus urban adult populations, although our own pediatric data revealed a higher incidence of kidney stones in children living in rural communities (6 ).
Metabolic Factors
The literature varies widely with regard to the percentage of pediatric patients who have nephrolithiasis and an identifiable underlying metabolic risk factor, ranging from 33% to 93% (19 , 20 , 22 , 23 , 26 – 29 ). Despite the variation in percentage of metabolic risk factors among pediatric SFs, it is clear that, in general, younger patients are more likely to have an identifiable metabolic risk factor. Underlying metabolic risk factors generally refer to innate characteristics of one's physiology that are stable over time and result in urinary conditions that are more conducive to stone formation. Underlying metabolic abnormalities can include enteric/absorptive, endocrinologic, or renal sources. “Identifiable” risk factors are limited by (1 ) whether we know they exist, (2 ) how they are defined, and (3 ) whether we can or do test for them. Of note, although not “metabolic,” anatomic abnormalities that result in urinary stasis or turbulent flow should also be considered when evaluating a child's underlying risk factors for stone formation.
Stone formation is a multifactorial process that involves both the patient's underlying metabolic background and environmental conditions that promote nephrolithiasis, such as volume depletion, infection, or intake of foods high in lithogenic solutes. Some underlying metabolic derangements, such as those found in children with Dent disease, primary hyperoxaluria, or Lesch-Nyhan syndrome, are severe enough that they can result in kidney stone formation without help from environmental stimuli. It is likely that more often our pediatric SFs have a milder underlying metabolic risk factor that lowers the threshold for forming a stone but still requires some contribution from the modifiable environment. Children with underlying metabolic characteristics that put them closer to that threshold will form stones more readily from smaller environmental contributions than children with a better metabolic profile, in whom the same environmental conditions will not lead to stone formation. A primary goal for research in pediatric nephrolithiasis will be to explore identifiable risk factors further and determine which ones are amenable to change.
Pediatric SFs predominantly form calcium-based calculi (30 ). Studies show that calcium is present in 72% to 88% of pediatric kidney stones (20 , 22 ). The same studies show uric acid present in only 2% to 3% of stones in pediatric patients, whereas uric acid is present in 11% of kidney stones in adults (31 ). Although struvite (ammonium magnesium phosphate) stones previously accounted for a more significant proportion of pediatric stones (17% in one study), improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of urinary tract infections have made this type of stone rare (20 , 22 ).
Why do younger patients form more calcium-based stones and fewer uric acid stones? Part of the answer may be that pediatric patients generally have a slightly higher urinary pH than adults. In a comparison between pediatric and adult 24-hour urine samples, Defoor et al. (32 ) showed that the mean urinary pH for children was 6.44 versus 6.05 for adults (P < 0.001). Another study of pediatric patients also showed an indirect relationship between pH and age (33 ). Because uric acid stones form preferentially in acidic urine, this difference in urinary pH may protect children from uric acid stones, despite that children have higher excretion of uric acid when adjusted for creatinine excretion (32 – 34 ).
Promoters of Stone Formation
The key determinant of calcium stone formation is urinary SS of calcium oxalate (SS CaOx) and calcium phosphate (SS CaP). SS generally describes the likelihood of crystals forming in solution and reflects the ratio of a salt's concentration in urine to its solubility. If SS is >1, then crystals will form; at SS <1, crystals will dissolve. Low urine volume generally increases solute concentration and, therefore, SS and further contributes to stone formation by leading to urinary stasis. The SS CaOx is primarily determined by the concentrations of calcium and oxalate in the urine, whereas SS CaP is primarily determined by urinary calcium concentration and urinary pH; both SS CaOx and SS CaP are affected inversely by citrate concentration (35 ). Children have higher urinary calcium excretion than adults when adjusted for creatinine excretion or body weight (32 , 36 – 38 ). Studies also show that children have higher urinary SS CaP than adults (32 ) and that stone-forming children have higher SS CaOx than non–stone-forming children (39 , 40 ). In addition, recurrent pediatric SFs have higher calcium excretion when adjusted for creatinine excretion or body weight than solitary pediatric SFs, but this did not translate into significantly different SSs (40 , 41 ).
Elevated urinary oxalate augments SS CaOx and contributes to formation of calculi (31 , 42 ). Sources of oxalate include diet, the liver, erythrocytes, and metabolism of ascorbate. While data are mounting regarding oxalate, there remains much to learn regarding absorption, distribution, metabolism, and ultimate fate of oxalate in humans. Urinary oxalate excretion (adjusted for creatinine excretion) is considerably higher in children than in adults (32 ). Hyperoxaluria is present in approximately 14% to 18% of adult SFs (31 , 43 ) and approximately 11% to 20% of pediatric SFs (22 , 23 , 44 ). However, a study by Defoor et al. (39 ) did not find a significant difference in urinary oxalate excretion between SFs and non-SFs when adjusted for creatinine excretion. Oxalate excretion was not found to be as important as calcium regarding risk for recurrent kidney stones in children in one study (37 ). Taken together, the degree to which urinary oxalate contributes to pediatric nephrolithiasis is not clear.
Although a detailed discussion of the known genetic forms of primary hyperoxaluria is beyond the scope of this article, it is worth mentioning that milder forms may be more prevalent than initially believed and comprehensive diagnostic workup should be considered in children with nephrolithiasis and significant hyperoxaluria. If urine oxalate is found to be elevated, then initial screening should include analysis of urine for glycolate, glycerate, and glyoxalate at a reputable laboratory. Additional testing that may be indicated depending on the clinical situation and results of other tests are plasma oxalate, liver biopsy, and/or genetic testing.
No discussion of nephrolithiasis is complete without mention of Randall plaque. Randall plaque is composed of CaP and initially forms at the basement membrane of the thin loops of Henle before expanding to the interstitium (45 ). Formation of Randall plaque has been established as an integral part of idiopathic CaOx stone disease. Unfortunately, this is an area of glaring deficiency in the pediatric literature. It is unclear at what age Randall plaque begins to form. To date, there is no published evidence that Randall plaque forms in children, but that may be simply because no one has looked.
Uric acid stones are uncommon in the pediatric population despite that children naturally have a higher urinary excretion of uric acid when adjusted for creatinine excretion (32 ). Although hyperuricosuria may be a risk factor for calcium stone formation (46 ), one study concluded that excessive urinary uric acid excretion is not likely to increase the risk for calculi in the pediatric population (47 ). Another common lithogenic factor is low urinary volume, found in the majority of idiopathic SFs (48 ). Urine pH plays a role in stone risk as well. Low urine pH is the major determinant of risk for uric acid stones, whereas high pH is associated with CaP stones. Last, urinary tract infection used to play a significant role in pediatric nephrolithiasis as the major cause of ammonium magnesium phosphate (struvite) stones. This role has diminished with improved diagnosis and treatment of urinary tract infections, although the practitioner should always remember that an infected kidney stone is a true urologic emergency.
Inhibitors of Stone Formation
Citrate is a substance that is found in urine and chelates calcium, making it unavailable for binding with oxalate and phosphate and thereby lowering urinary SS and preventing stone formation (49 , 50 ). Urinary citrate levels are highest in young children and decrease into adulthood (32 , 33 ), but relative hypocitraturia is a common finding in pediatric nephrolithiasis (22 , 23 , 28 , 39 , 40 , 51 , 52 ). Hypocitraturia has also been shown to be a risk factor for recurrent stone disease in children (37 , 41 ). Treatment with oral citrate supplementation has been shown to reduce stone risk (53 , 54 ).
Although citrate is the best described inhibitor of stone formation, magnesium is also included in the discussion of kidney stone prevention. Although not as exhaustively researched as hypocitraturia, hypomagnesuria has been established as a risk factor for formation of calculi (55 , 56 ). In children, urinary magnesium excretion decreases with age when adjusted for creatinine excretion or body weight (33 ). A group from Turkey found that hypomagnesuria was more commonly associated with nephrolithiasis in children than in adults (57 ). Stone-forming children have a higher urinary calcium-to-magnesium ratio than non–stone-forming children, and children with recurrent stones have a higher calcium-to-magnesium ratio than solitary SFs (40 ). Treatment with oral magnesium alone has not been shown to improve stone risk, although risk improves when combined with citrate supplementation (58 , 59 ).
Other endogenous inhibitors of stone formation have been identified, including glycosaminoglycans (60 ), Tamm-Horsfall protein (61 ), pyrophosphate (62 ), nephrocalcin (63 ), and osteopontin (64 ), among others. The mechanism by which they reduce kidney stone burden is through bonding with crystal surface calcium, thereby getting in the way of crystal aggregation. Although there is a paucity of definitive data regarding these inhibitors in pediatric nephrolithiasis, they serve as an intriguing and potentially fertile area for further investigation.
Why the Increasing Incidence in Pediatric Nephrolithiasis?
From what we have reviewed so far, it is clear that the incidence of pediatric nephrolithiasis is increasing, but no reason for the increase has been elucidated. Although there is a lack of clear data, there is plenty of speculation. Some of the most oft-discussed potential causes for the increase in pediatric kidney stone disease are obesity; changes in dietary habits such as increased sodium intake, decreased calcium intake, decreased water intake, and increased fructose intake; and increasing use of antibiotics. The merits of each possibility are briefly discussed.
Obesity as a cause for the rise in pediatric nephrolithiasis is a very attractive prospect given both the gravity of the obesity epidemic and its apparent temporal relationship to the increase in incidence of kidney stones. However, epidemiologic data cast doubt on this relationship. Between 1999 and 2008, a period in which we observed a significant increase in pediatric kidney stone disease, there was no significant change in the rates of overweight (body mass index [BMI] ≥85th percentile for age) or obesity (BMI ≥95th percentile for age) in US children (65 ). This holds true when the pediatric population is broken down by gender and specific age groups. The only increase found in analysis of these data was a statistically significant linear trend for 6- to 19-year-old boys for BMI ≥97th percentile.
The putative mechanism by which obesity leads to increased uric acid stone risk is a combination of increased lithogenic solute concentration and decreased urinary pH as BMI increases, thereby predisposing to uric acid crystallization. Although lower urinary pH increases uric acid crystallization, it does not directly affect CaOx crystallization. However, increasing uric acid crystallization may promote heterogeneous nucleation of CaOx, possibly leading to increased risk for CaOx stones in obese individuals (66 ). A number of studies have shown that overweight and obese adults may be at higher risk for kidney stones and have urine chemistry predisposing to the formation of calculi (66 – 70 ), whereas other studies have not shown as clear a link (71 – 74 ).
Studies examining the relationship between stone risk and obesity in children are few. Sarica et al. (75 ) studied 94 children in Turkey and found that overweight children had higher excretion of urinary oxalate and uric acid, higher SS CaOx, lower urine volume, and lower excretion of citrate and magnesium. Although this generally supports the lithogenic effect of higher BMI, some weaknesses in this study should be noted. First, the urinary analytes were corrected using body weight, which does not necessarily equate to excretion rate adjusted using creatinine. This is perhaps best illustrated by the difference in relative excretion of calcium between the two groups. When adjusted for body weight, the overweight group had a higher calcium excretion rate, suggesting increased risk for stones. However, when adjusted for creatinine excretion, the overweight group had a lower calcium excretion rate. This example highlights the difficulty in assessing stone risk in populations with highly variable metabolic backgrounds such as children. Rather than using cutoff points to define obesity, hypercalciuria, hyperoxaluria, and other analytes because the patients had variable body weights and creatinine excretion rates, it would have been more illustrative to provide the data as continuous variables. It should also be noted that the definitions they used to define normal, overweight, and obese do not match the definitions used in the United States, and it is unclear whether data from the Turkish pediatric population can be extrapolated to the US population.
Kieran et al. (76 ) analyzed the relationship between BMI and stone formation in a pediatric population. Their data revealed that 41% of their SFs were overweight or obese, which is slightly higher than the overweight/obesity rate observed in the general pediatric population in their state (77 ). Interestingly, they found that low body weight was associated with increased severity of stone disease. Eisner et al. (78 ) analyzed 24-hour urine data from their stone-forming pediatric population and correlated the results to BMI quartiles on the basis of child height and weight as reported by their parents. They found that higher BMI correlated with higher SS CaP but lower urinary oxalate excretion (adjusted for creatinine excretion). Of note, they also found that higher BMI did not correlate with lower urine pH as it does in adults. In our own pediatric stone-forming population, we are finding a slightly lower BMI percentile compared with our general, non–stone-forming pediatric population (unpublished data). When trying to establish a link between obesity and increased stone risk for children, the limited data available are not convincing but certainly warrant continued investigation.
Increased sodium intake may be the most likely culprit leading to the increase in pediatric nephrolithiasis. There is evidence that American children eat too much salt, although NHANES data reflect that salt intake may be declining slightly in the adolescent population (79 ). Given that most children get a significant portion of their nutrition from school-prepared meals, it is troublesome that 92% of school meals exceed the acceptable upper limit of sodium (80 ). The strong evidence, both epidemiologic (81 , 82 ) and mechanistic (83 – 86 ), linking increased sodium intake with increased risk for nephrolithiasis make this area an extraordinarily high priority for research.
Calcium intake has decreased in children in recent years; this may be due, at least in part, to the replacement of milk with sugary drinks (79 , 80 , 87 , 88 ). There is ample evidence, although counterintuitive, that decreased calcium intake increases risk for nephrolithiasis (25 , 81 , 89 ). Perhaps more intuitive, there is evidence that lower fluid intake leads to kidney stones (89 ) and that children are drinking less water than they used to (90 ). Although there are no data assessing these relationships in children, they are attractive targets for detailed examination.
While increasing fructose consumption has been linked epidemiologically to nephrolithiasis risk (91 ), results from a small but well designed study by Knight et al. (92 ) challenge any link between fructose and urinary stone risk factors. They found that individuals who ate a controlled diet differing only in fructose content showed no difference in 24-hour urine lithogens. Given that fructose consumption is increasing (93 ), further investigation in this area is warranted.
An increase in antibiotic use by children has been put forth as a possible contributor to the increasing incidence of pediatric nephrolithiasis. There is no evidence linking antibiotic use to idiopathic stone disease, but the proposed mechanism is based on the fact that the human gut is colonized by a multitude of microbes that may affect absorption of potentially lithogenic molecules and that the type and abundance of these intestinal microbes are disrupted with antibiotic use. The best studied of these is Oxalobacter formigenes , which is found in the intestine and uses oxalate as an energy source. A study by Kaufman et al. (94 ) showed that SFs have decreased bowel colonization with O. formigenes ; another study by Sidhu et al. (95 ) of patients with cystic fibrosis demonstrated that decreased gut O. formigenes is associated with higher urinary oxalate levels. Although these data lend support to the theory that antibiotics may increase stone risk through disruption of normal gut flora, recent data showing decreasing use of antibiotics in American children (96 , 97 ) make this theory less likely.
Conclusions
The incidence of kidney stones in children is on the rise, as is the consequent burden on the health care system. Given the apparent differences between pediatric SFs and their adult counterparts, it is inappropriate to assume that an identical approach to the treatment of pediatric SFs is acceptable. The vast majority of pediatric stones are calcium based, and investigating causes should be focused on factors that contribute to increased calcium excretion, SS CaOx and CaP, and decreased urinary citrate and continuing to look for other urinary stone promoters and inhibitors.
The pediatric population most affected by the increase in stone disease seems to be adolescents and girls, who are more likely to get kidney stones and require hospitalization for treatment. Examination of differences in urine chemistry between boys and girls has not yet been performed and may provide interesting and useful results. Last but perhaps most important, we must continue to investigate potential environmental and dietary factors that could be contributing to the increasing incidence of pediatric nephrolithiasis so that we may better prevent this painful and costly condition.
Disclosures
None.
Published online ahead of print. Publication date available at www.cjasn.org .
References
1. Gillen DL, Coe FL, Worcester EM: Nephrolithiasis and increased blood pressure among females with high body mass index. Am J Kidney Dis 46: 263–269, 2005
2. Gillen DL, Worcester EM, Coe FL: Decreased renal function among adults with a history of nephrolithiasis: A study of NHANES III. Kidney Int 67: 685–690, 2005
3. Rule AD, Bergstralh EJ, Melton LJ 3rd, Li X, Weaver AL, Lieske JC: Kidney stones and the risk for chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 4: 804–811, 2009
4. Worcester EM, Parks JH, Evan AP, Coe FL: Renal function in patients with nephrolithiasis. J Urol 176: 600–603, discussion 603, 2006
5. Lotan Y: Economics and cost of care of stone disease. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 16: 5–10, 2009
6. Sas DJ, Hulsey TC, Shatat IF, Orak JK: Incidence of kidney stones in children evaluated in the ER is increasing. J Pediatr 157: 132–137, 2010
7. Bush NC, Xu L, Brown BJ, Holzer MS, Gingrich A, Schuler B, Tong L, Baker LA: Hospitalizations for pediatric stone disease in United States, 2002–2007. J Urol 183: 1151–1156, 2010
8. Routh JC, Graham DA, Nelson CP: Epidemiological trends in pediatric urolithiasis at United States freestanding pediatric hospitals. J Urol 184: 1100–1104, 2010
9. Edvardsson V, Elidottir H, Indridason OS, Palsson R: High incidence of kidney stones in Icelandic children. Pediatr Nephrol 20: 940–944, 2005
10. Yasui T, Iguchi M, Suzuki S, Kohri K: Prevalence and epidemiological characteristics of urolithiasis in Japan: National trends between 1965 and 2005. Urology 71: 209–213, 2008
11. Lieske JC, Pena de la Vega LS, Slezak JM, Bergstralh EJ, Leibson CL, Ho KL, Gettman MT: Renal stone epidemiology in Rochester, Minnesota: An update. Kidney Int 69: 760–764, 2006
12. Curhan GC, Willett WC, Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ: A prospective study of dietary calcium and other nutrients and the risk of symptomatic kidney stones. N Engl J Med 328: 833–838, 1993
13. Curhan GC, Willett WC, Speizer FE, Spiegelman D, Stampfer MJ: Comparison of dietary calcium with supplemental calcium and other nutrients as factors affecting the risk for kidney stones in women. Ann Intern Med 126: 497–504, 1997
14. Pearle MS, Calhoun EA, Curhan GC: Urologic diseases in America project: Urolithiasis. J Urol 173: 848–857, 2005
15. Stamatelou KK, Francis ME, Jones CA, Nyberg LM, Curhan GC: Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976–1994. Kidney Int 63: 1817–1823, 2003
16. Novak TE, Lakshmanan Y, Trock BJ, Gearhart JP, Matlaga BR: Sex prevalence of pediatric kidney stone disease in the United States: An epidemiologic investigation. Urology 74: 104–107, 2009
17. Mente A, Honey RJ, McLaughlin JR, Bull SB, Logan AG: Ethnic differences in relative risk of idiopathic calcium nephrolithiasis in North America. J Urol 178: 1992–1997, discussion 1997, 2007
18. Curhan GC: Epidemiology of stone disease. Urol Clin North Am 34: 287–293, 2007
19. Pietrow PK, Pope JC 4th, Adams MC, Shyr Y, Brock JW 3rd: Clinical outcome of pediatric stone disease. J Urol 167: 670–673, 2002
20. Kalorin CM, Zabinski A, Okpareke I, White M, Kogan BA: Pediatric urinary stone disease: Does age matter? J Urol 181: 2267–2271, discussion 2271, 2009
21. Coward RJ, Peters CJ, Duffy PG, Corry D, Kellett MJ, Choong S, van't Hoff WG: Epidemiology of paediatric renal stone disease in the UK. Arch Dis Child 88: 962–965, 2003
22. Milliner DS, Murphy ME: Urolithiasis in pediatric patients. Mayo Clin Proc 68: 241–248, 1993
23. VanDervoort K, Wiesen J, Frank R, Vento S, Crosby V, Chandra M, Trachtman H: Urolithiasis in pediatric patients: A single center study of incidence, clinical presentation and outcome. J Urol 177: 2300–2305, 2007
24. Persaud AC, Stevenson MD, McMahon DR, Christopher NC: Pediatric urolithiasis: Clinical predictors in the emergency department. Pediatrics 124: 888–894, 2009
25. Soucie JM, Coates RJ, McClellan W, Austin H, Thun M: Relation between geographic variability in kidney stones prevalence and risk factors for stones. Am J Epidemiol 143: 487–495, 1996
26. Perrone HC, dos Santos DR, Santos MV, Pinheiro ME, Toporovski J, Ramos OL, Schor N: Urolithiasis in childhood: Metabolic evaluation. Pediatr Nephrol 6: 54–56, 1992
27. Naseri M, Varasteh AR, Alamdaran SA: Metabolic factors associated with urinary calculi in children. Iran J Kidney Dis 4: 32–38, 2010
28. Spivacow FR, Negri AL, del Valle EE, Calvino I, Fradinger E, Zanchetta JR: Metabolic risk factors in children with kidney stone disease. Pediatr Nephrol 23: 1129–1133, 2008
29. Polinsky MS, Kaiser BA, Baluarte HJ: Urolithiasis in childhood. Pediatr Clin North Am 34: 683–710, 1987
30. Cameron MA, Sakhaee K, Moe OW: Nephrolithiasis in children. Pediatr Nephrol 20: 1587–1592, 2005
31. Pak CY, Poindexter JR, Adams-Huet B, Pearle MS: Predictive value of kidney stone composition in the detection of metabolic abnormalities. Am J Med 115: 26–32, 2003
32. Defoor W, Asplin J, Jackson E, Jackson C, Reddy P, Sheldon C, Minevich E: Results of a prospective trial to compare normal urine supersaturation in children and adults. J Urol 174: 1708–1710, 2005
33. Borawski KM, Sur RL, Miller OF, Pak CY, Preminger GM, Kolon TF: Urinary reference values for stone risk factors in children. J Urol 179: 290–294, discussion 294, 2008
34. Maalouf NM, Cameron MA, Moe OW, Sakhaee K: Novel insights into the pathogenesis of uric acid nephrolithiasis. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 13: 181–189, 2004
35. Coe FL, Evan A, Worcester E: Kidney stone disease. J Clin Invest 115: 2598–2608, 2005
36. Battino BS, DeFoor W, Coe F, Tackett L, Erhard M, Wacksman J, Sheldon CA, Minevich E: Metabolic evaluation of children with urolithiasis: Are adult references for supersaturation appropriate? J Urol 168: 2568–2571, 2002
37. DeFoor WR, Jackson E, Minevich E, Caillat A, Reddy P, Sheldon C, Asplin J: The risk of recurrent urolithiasis in children is dependent on urinary calcium and citrate. Urology 76: 242–245, 2010
38. Langley SE, Fry CH: Differences in the free Ca2+ in undiluted urine from stone formers and normal subjects using a new generation of ion-selective electrodes. Br J Urol 75: 288–295, 1995
39. DeFoor W, Asplin J, Jackson E, Jackson C, Reddy P, Sheldon C, Erhard M, Minevich E: Urinary metabolic evaluations in normal and stone forming children. J Urol 176: 1793–1796, 2006
40. Sikora P, Zajaczkowska M, Hoppe B: Assessment of crystallization risk formulas in pediatric calcium stone-formers. Pediatr Nephrol 24: 1997–2003, 2009
41. DeFoor W, Minevich E, Jackson E, Reddy P, Clark C, Sheldon C, Asplin J: Urinary metabolic evaluations in solitary and recurrent stone forming children. J Urol 179: 2369–2372, 2008
42. Pak CY, Adams-Huet B, Poindexter JR, Pearle MS, Peterson RD, Moe OW: Rapid Communication: Relative effect of urinary calcium and oxalate on saturation of calcium oxalate. Kidney Int 66: 2032–2037, 2004
43. Penniston KL, Nakada SY: Effect of dietary changes on urinary oxalate excretion and calcium oxalate supersaturation in patients with hyperoxaluric stone formation. Urology 73: 484–489, 2009
44. Neuhaus TJ, Belzer T, Blau N, Hoppe B, Sidhu H, Leumann E: Urinary oxalate excretion in urolithiasis and nephrocalcinosis. Arch Dis Child 82: 322–326, 2000
45. Evan A, Lingeman J, Coe FL, Worcester E: Randall's plaque: Pathogenesis and role in calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis. Kidney Int 69: 1313–1318, 2006
46. Coe FL: Hyperuricosuric calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis. Kidney Int 13: 418–426, 1978
47. Miller LA, Noe HN, Stapleton FB: Uric acid excretion in children with urolithiasis. J Pediatr 115: 923–926, 1989
48. Miller LA, Stapleton FB: Urinary volume in children with urolithiasis. J Urol 141: 918–920, 1989
49. Hallson PC, Rose GA, Sulaiman S: Raising urinary citrate lowers calcium oxalate and calcium phosphate crystal formation in whole urine. Urol Int 38: 179–181, 1983
50. Tiselius HG, Berg C, Fornander AM, Nilsson MA: Effects of citrate on the different phases of calcium oxalate crystallization. Scanning Microsc 7: 381–389, discussion 389–390, 1993
51. Akcay T, Konukoglu D, Celik C: Hypocitraturia in patients with urolithiasis. Arch Dis Child 74: 350–351, 1996
52. Tekin A, Tekgul S, Atsu N, Sahin A, Ozen H, Bakkaloglu M: A study of the etiology of idiopathic calcium urolithiasis in children: Hypocitruria is the most important risk factor. J Urol 164: 162–165, 2000
53. Barcelo P, Wuhl O, Servitge E, Rousaud A, Pak CY: Randomized double-blind study of potassium citrate in idiopathic hypocitraturic calcium nephrolithiasis. J Urol 150: 1761–1764, 1993
54. Ettinger B, Pak CY, Citron JT, Thomas C, Adams-Huet B, Vangessel A: Potassium-magnesium citrate is an effective prophylaxis against recurrent calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis. J Urol 158: 2069–2073, 1997
55. Jorgensen FS: The urinary excretion and serum concentration of calcium, magnesium, sodium and phosphate in male patients with recurring renal stone formation. Scand J Urol Nephrol 9: 243–248, 1975
56. Siener R, Schade N, Nicolay C, von Unruh GE, Hesse A: The efficacy of dietary intervention on urinary risk factors for stone formation in recurrent calcium oxalate stone patients. J Urol 173: 1601–1605, 2005
57. Tefekli A, Esen T, Ziylan O, Erol B, Armagan A, Ander H, Akinci M: Metabolic risk factors in pediatric and adult calcium oxalate urinary stone formers: Is there any difference? Urol Int 70: 273–277, 2003
58. Ettinger B, Citron JT, Livermore B, Dolman LI: Chlorthalidone reduces calcium oxalate calculous recurrence but magnesium hydroxide does not. J Urol 139: 679–684, 1988
59. Kato Y, Yamaguchi S, Yachiku S, Nakazono S, Hori J, Wada N, Hou K: Changes in urinary parameters after oral administration of potassium-sodium citrate and magnesium oxide to prevent urolithiasis. Urology 63: 7–11, discussion 11–12, 2004
60. Ryall RL: Glycosaminoglycans, proteins, and stone formation: Adult themes and child's play. Pediatr Nephrol 10: 656–666, 1996
61. Hess B, Nakagawa Y, Parks JH, Coe FL: Molecular abnormality of Tamm-Horsfall glycoprotein in calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis. Am J Physiol 260: F569–F578, 1991
62. Fleisch H, Bisaz S: Mechanism of calcification: Inhibitory role of pyrophosphate. Nature 195: 911, 1962
63. Coe FL, Nakagawa Y, Asplin J, Parks JH: Role of nephrocalcin in inhibition of calcium oxalate crystallization and nephrolithiasis. Miner Electrolyte Metab 20: 378–384, 1994
64. Asplin JR, Arsenault D, Parks JH, Coe FL, Hoyer JR: Contribution of human uropontin to inhibition of calcium oxalate crystallization. Kidney Int 53: 194–199, 1998
65. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, McDowell MA, Tabak CJ, Flegal KM: Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999–2004. JAMA 295: 1549–1555, 2006
66. Maalouf NM, Sakhaee K, Parks JH, Coe FL, Adams-Huet B, Pak CY: Association of urinary pH with body weight in nephrolithiasis. Kidney Int 65: 1422–1425, 2004
67. Siener R, Glatz S, Nicolay C, Hesse A: The role of overweight and obesity in calcium oxalate stone formation. Obes Res 12: 106–113, 2004
68. Taylor EN, Curhan GC: Body size and 24-hour urine composition. Am J Kidney Dis 48: 905–915, 2006
69. Taylor EN, Stampfer MJ, Curhan GC: Obesity, weight gain, and the risk of kidney stones. JAMA 293: 455–462, 2005
70. West B, Luke A, Durazo-Arvizu RA, Cao G, Shoham D, Kramer H: Metabolic syndrome and self-reported history of kidney stones: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) 1988–1994. Am J Kidney Dis 51: 741–747, 2008
71. Daudon M, Lacour B, Jungers P: Influence of body size on urinary stone composition in men and women. Urol Res 34: 193–199, 2006
72. Negri AL, Spivacow FR, Del Valle EE, Forrester M, Rosende G, Pinduli I: Role of overweight and obesity on the urinary excretion of promoters and inhibitors of stone formation in stone formers. Urol Res 36: 303–307, 2008
73. Negri AL, Spivacow R, Del Valle E, Pinduli I, Marino A, Fradinger E, Zanchetta JR: Clinical and biochemical profile of patients with “pure” uric acid nephrolithiasis compared with “pure” calcium oxalate stone formers. Urol Res 35: 247–251, 2007
74. Powell CR, Stoller ML, Schwartz BF, Kane C, Gentle DL, Bruce JE, Leslie SW: Impact of body weight on urinary electrolytes in urinary stone formers. Urology 55: 825–830, 2000
75. Sarica K, Eryildirim B, Yencilek F, Kuyumcuoglu U: Role of overweight status on stone-forming risk factors in children: A prospective study. Urology 73: 1003–1007, 2009
76. Kieran K, Giel DW, Morris BJ, Wan JY, Tidwell CD, Giem A, Jerkins GR, Williams MA: Pediatric urolithiasis: Does body mass index influence stone presentation and treatment? J Urol 184: 1810–1815, 2010
77. Data Resource Center for Child and Adolescent Health: Child and Adolescent Health Measurement Initiative: Child Health Measures for Tennessee, 2007.
http://www.childhealthdata.org/content/Default.aspx . Accessed December 17, 2010
78. Eisner BH, Eisenberg ML, Stoller ML: Influence of body mass index on quantitative 24-hour urine chemistry studies in children with nephrolithiasis. J Urol 182: 1142–1145, 2009
79. Briefel RR, Johnson CL: Secular trends in dietary intake in the United States. Annu Rev Nutr 24: 401–431, 2004
80. Clark MA, Fox MK: Nutritional quality of the diets of US public school children and the role of the school meal programs. J Am Diet Assoc 109: S44–S56, 2009
81. Borghi L, Schianchi T, Meschi T, Guerra A, Allegri F, Maggiore U, Novarini A: Comparison of two diets for the prevention of recurrent stones in idiopathic hypercalciuria. N Engl J Med 346: 77–84, 2002
82. Taylor EN, Fung TT, Curhan GC: DASH-style diet associates with reduced risk for kidney stones. J Am Soc Nephrol 20: 2253–2259, 2009
83. Breslau NA, McGuire JL, Zerwekh JE, Pak CY: The role of dietary sodium on renal excretion and intestinal absorption of calcium and on vitamin D metabolism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 55: 369–373, 1982
84. Nordin BE, Need AG, Morris HA, Horowitz M: The nature and significance of the relationship between urinary sodium and urinary calcium in women. J Nutr 123: 1615–1622, 1993
85. Osorio AV, Alon US: The relationship between urinary calcium, sodium, and potassium excretion and the role of potassium in treating idiopathic hypercalciuria. Pediatrics 100: 675–681, 1997
86. Sakhaee K, Harvey JA, Padalino PK, Whitson P, Pak CY: The potential role of salt abuse on the risk for kidney stone formation. J Urol 150: 310–312, 1993
87. Keller KL, Kirzner J, Pietrobelli A, St-Onge MP, Faith MS: Increased sweetened beverage intake is associated with reduced milk and calcium intake in 3- to 7-year-old children at multi-item laboratory lunches. J Am Diet Assoc 109: 497–501, 2009
88. Rajeshwari R, Yang SJ, Nicklas TA, Berenson GS: Secular trends in children's sweetened-beverage consumption (1973 to 1994): The Bogalusa Heart Study. J Am Diet Assoc 105: 208–214, 2005
89. Taylor EN, Stampfer MJ, Curhan GC: Dietary factors and the risk of incident kidney stones in men: New insights after 14 years of follow-up. J Am Soc Nephrol 15: 3225–3232, 2004
90. Kant AK, Graubard BI: Contributors of water intake in US children and adolescents: Associations with dietary and meal characteristics—National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005–2006. Am J Clin Nutr 92: 887–896, 2010
91. Taylor EN, Curhan GC: Fructose consumption and the risk of kidney stones. Kidney Int 73: 207–212, 2008
92. Knight J, Assimos DG, Easter L, Holmes RP: Metabolism of fructose to oxalate and glycolate. Horm Metab Res 42: 868–873, 2010
93. Marriott BP, Cole N, Lee E: National estimates of dietary fructose intake increased from 1977 to 2004 in the United States. J Nutr 139: 1228S–1235S, 2009
94. Kaufman DW, Kelly JP, Curhan GC, Anderson TE, Dretler SP, Preminger GM, Cave DR:
Oxalobacter formigenes may reduce the risk of calcium oxalate kidney stones. J Am Soc Nephrol 19: 1197–1203, 2008
95. Sidhu H, Hoppe B, Hesse A, Tenbrock K, Bromme S, Rietschel E, Peck AB: Absence of
Oxalobacter formigenes in cystic fibrosis patients: a risk factor for hyperoxaluria. Lancet 352: 1026–1029, 1998
96. Grijalva CG, Nuorti JP, Griffin MR: Antibiotic prescription rates for acute respiratory tract infections in US ambulatory settings. JAMA 302: 758–766, 2009
97. McCaig LF, Besser RE, Hughes JM: Trends in antimicrobial prescribing rates for children and adolescents. JAMA 287: 3096–3102, 2002