It's Time to Compare Anemia Management Strategies in Hemodialysis : Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

Journal Logo

Special Feature: Special Feature

It's Time to Compare Anemia Management Strategies in Hemodialysis

Coyne, Daniel W.

Author Information
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 5(4):p 740-742, April 2010. | DOI: 10.2215/CJN.02490409
  • Free


Anemia management in dialysis remains a contentious field (1,2). Trials of IV iron in dialysis routinely show erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) dose reductions of 30% to 70% (2). After early termination of the Normal Hematocrit Cardiac Trial (NHT) in 1996, which showed higher hemoglobin (Hgb) targets increased mortality, a post hoc analysis indicated higher intravenous (IV) iron dose was a risk factor for death (3). A decade later, the dangers of ESAs became apparent (46). Higher Hgb targets require higher ESA doses, and those not achieving target Hgb receive increasing ESA doses (3,5,79). Correction of Hemoglobin and Outcomes in Renal Insufficiency (CHOIR) and the NHT show ESA hyporesponders are at increased risk of CV events and death (3,5). Thus, harm associated with more intensive ESA dosing may be due to higher Hgb, higher ESA doses, or both (10,11).

A recent commentary (1) stated IV iron's safety is unproven, and we have learned little from Dialysis Patients' Response to IV Iron with Elevated Ferritin (DRIVE; a 6-week randomized trial of IV iron versus no iron) (7) or DRIVE II (the 6-week follow-up where anemia management was at the physicians' discretion) (12) while neglecting decades of other IV iron studies. Numerous studies have explored the safety of IV iron and have shown general safety in usual clinical practice (1320). However, no prospective safety trials of IV iron have been adequately powered to examine infections, cardiovascular events, and deaths. Compared with no iron, use of IV iron increases Hgb and/or reduces ESA dose (2). Consequently, a long-term IV iron safety trial targeting a single Hgb target will result in significantly different mean ESA doses between arms, effectively testing the safety of higher versus lower ESA doses as well. Therefore, I believe we should pursue trials comparing anemia practices, not individual drugs.

A number of randomized trials and observational studies have found a low incidence of acute reactions to IV iron products (14,17,19,2123). Longer prospective observations have not clearly identified safety issues (1517). A cohort study of U.S. dialysis patients showed those billed for >10 vials of IV iron dextran (>1000 mg) over 6 months had an elevated rate of death (adjusted relative risk: 1.11; 95% confidence interval: 1.00 to 1.24) (24). A subsequent cohort study applied “multivariable models that appropriately account for time-varying measures of iron administration as well as other fixed and time-varying measures of morbidity” and “found no statistically significant association between any level of iron administration and mortality” (25). Thus, associations between iron administration and higher mortality may be confounded (25). A meta-analysis of 13 trials comparing IV to oral iron found a greater increase in Hgb with IV iron, and no difference in mortality in the five trials reporting the data (relative risk: 0.28; 95% confidence interval: 0.02 to 5.22) (26). IV iron is hypothesized to increase infection risk, although trials have not found an increased infection rate and observational data are contradictory (27). Some hypothesize that IV iron may contribute to cardiovascular events by increasing oxidative stress (2830). Although markers of oxidative stress may be increased by iron, observational studies have been contradictory in linking IV iron use to adverse clinical outcomes (27). At usual clinical doses, the dangers of IV iron remain unproven.

The NHT, the first clear study showing ESAs might cause cardiovascular events, was terminated in 1996 because the high-Hgb target arm was approaching significant harm (3). The 1998 publication speculated the increased deaths and myocardial infarctions in the high-Hgb arm were due to lower Kt/V or IV iron but not ESA, yet the patients at highest risk were those randomized to ESA increases and not achieving the high Hgb target (3). Ten years later, the second publication from the NHT was a letter to the New England Journal of Medicine stating the 1998 publication presented interim results (31). The final results showed a larger treated population and longer treatment duration. The relative risk of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction was 1.28 in the high-Hgb target arm, with unadjusted confidence intervals of 1.06 to 1.56, and 0.92 to 1.78 when adjusted for the previous interim analyses (31,32). Subsequent ESA trials in various disease states show an increase in thrombosis, strokes, cardiovascular events, cancer progression, and deaths (4,6). IV iron is not accounting for ESA harm: few patients in CHOIR received iron, and their outcomes were quite good (5,8). A reanalysis of CHOIR found subjects who received high doses of ESA and subjects who were ESA hyporesponders (i.e. not achieving Hgb target) are at greatest risk (8). In the NHT, ESA dose was not associated with increased risk, whereas ESA hyporesponsiveness and high cumulative ESA dose were associated with increased risk (3,32). The risks associated with higher doses of ESAs operate through uncertain mechanisms and may relate to higher Hgb, ESA dose, or both. Targeting a lower Hgb may avoid the risks of ESAs in dialysis if that risk is mediated by a Hgb level >13 g/dl.

Why Is There No Long-Term Iron Safety Study?

A long-term randomized IV iron safety study is more complicated than it appears. Only hemodialysis patients receive repeated iron, so the study should be in this population, and target Hgb should be the same in both arms. To maximize any safety differences, one group should be kept very iron replete (transferrin saturation [TSAT] 25% to 50%, ferritin >500 ng/ml, receiving continuous IV iron), whereas the no-iron group would get iron only when definitely deficient (TSAT <20% or ferritin <200 ng/dl per the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative), and then just enough to raise TSAT or ferritin above these limits. This no-iron group could also receive IV iron when ESA dose was maximized (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services reimburses for approximately 30,000 units of epoetin per treatment). Because studies have repeatedly shown the ESA-sparing effects of IV iron, an iron safety study will quickly evolve into “higher ESA dose without iron” versus “lower ESA dose with iron.”

In such a trial, the “lower ESA dose with iron” arm may perform better because compared with ESA therapy alone, addition of IV iron significantly increases mean Hgb, the proportion of patients responding, the speed of Hgb response, TSAT, ferritin, and serum iron, and it decreases mean ESA dose (7,12). All of these interim outcomes and markers are associated with better survival. Additionally, some interpret the NHT and CHOIR trial results to indicate less ESA is safer than more ESA (3,5,33).

Conversely, the “higher ESA dose without iron” arm may provide greater safety. In addition to the proposed increased risk of infections and oxidative stress mentioned above, IV iron use in ESA-treated patients is associated with greater likelihood of exceeding target Hgb, which may be a mediator of the harm associated with higher dosing of ESA (34). Last, both management strategies may be equally safe, in which case the optimal management of patients should be performed on the basis of cost effectiveness.

We Still Need Anemia Trials

Safer anemia management begins with a lower Hgb target, which should be 10 to 12 g/dl, as the Food and Drug Administration recommends (4). There is sufficient controversy about the safety of IV iron and higher ESA doses to justify comparative trials of anemia management strategies. ESA producers should fund these trials because they profit the most from anemia management at this time. U.S. taxpayers have paid enough for anemia management in dialysis and should not fund these trials.

In conclusion, rather than focusing on individual drug safety, the renal community should pursue comparative trials of different anemia treatment strategies to define the most effective, safe, and cost-efficient management.


D.W.C. is a consultant and speaker for Watson, AMAG, and Sanofi, all makers of IV iron products. He is a past consultant to Amgen and Roche, makers of ESAs. He participates in multicenter studies of IV iron and ESAs funded by Affymax, AMAG, Amgen, Johnson & Johnson, Roche, and Watson. He is the lead investigator of the DRIVE trials.

Published online ahead of print. Publication date available at


1. Spiegel DM, Chertow GM: Lost without directions: Lessons from the anemia debate and the Drive study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 4: 1009–1010, 2009
2. Coyne DW: A comprehensive vision for intravenous iron therapy. Am J Kidney Dis 52[ Suppl 1]: S14–S20, 2008
3. Besarab A, Bolton WK, Browne JK, Egrie JC, Nissenson AR, Okamoto DM, Schwab SJ, Goodkin DA: The effects of normal as compared with low hematocrit values in patients with cardiac disease who are receiving hemodialysis and epoetin. [see comment]. N Engl J Med 339: 584–590, 1998
4. Epogen Package Insert Revised April 2009,
5. Singh AK, Szczech L, Tang KL, Barnhart H, Sapp S, Wolfson M, Reddan D: Correction of anemia with epoetin alfa in chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med 355: 2085–2098, 2006
6. Bennett CL, Silver SM, Djulbegovic B, Samaras AT, Blau CA, Gleason KJ, Barnato SE, Elverman KM, Courtney DM, McKoy JM, Edwards BJ, Tigue CC, Raisch DW, Yarnold PR, Dorr DA, Kuzel TM, Tallman MS, Trifilio SM, West DP, Lai SY, Henke M: Venous thromboembolism and mortality associated with recombinant erythropoietin and darbepoetin administration for the treatment of cancer-associated anemia. JAMA 299: 914–924, 2008
7. Coyne DW, Kapoian T, Suki W, Singh AK, Moran JE, Dahl NV, Rizkala AR: Ferric gluconate is highly efficacious in anemic hemodialysis patients with high serum ferritin and low transferrin saturation: Results of the Dialysis Patients' Response to IV Iron with Elevated Ferritin (DRIVE) Study. J Am Soc Nephrol 18: 975–984, 2007
8. Szczech LA, Barnhart HX, Inrig JK, Reddan DN, Sapp S, Califf RM, Patel UD, Singh AK: Secondary analysis of the CHOIR trial epoetin-alpha dose and achieved hemoglobin outcomes. Kidney Int 74: 791–798, 2008
9. Drueke TB, Locatelli F, Clyne N, Eckardt KU, Macdougall IC, Tsakiris D, Burger HU, Scherhag A: Normalization of hemoglobin level in patients with chronic kidney disease and anemia. N Engl J Med 355: 2071–2084, 2006
10. Zhang Y, Thamer M, Stefanik K, Kaufman J, Cotter DJ: Epoetin requirements predict mortality in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 44: 866–876, 2004
11. Regidor DL, Kopple JD, Kovesdy CP, Kilpatrick RD, McAllister CJ, Aronovitz J, Greenland S, Kalantar-Zadeh K: Associations between changes in hemoglobin and administered erythropoiesis-stimulating agent and survival in hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 17: 1181–1191, 2006
12. Kapoian T, O'Mara NB, Singh AK, Moran J, Rizkala AR, Geronemus R, Kopelman RC, Dahl NV, Coyne DW: Ferric gluconate reduces epoetin requirements in hemodialysis patients with elevated ferritin. J Am Soc Nephrol 19: 372–379, 2008
13. Michael B, Coyne DW, Fishbane S, Folkert V, Lynn R, Nissenson AR, Agarwal R, Eschbach JW, Fadem SZ, Trout JR, Strobos J, Warnock DG: Sodium ferric gluconate complex in hemodialysis patients: Adverse reactions compared to placebo and iron dextran. Kidney Int 61: 1830–1839, 2002
14. Coyne DW, Adkinson NF, Nissenson AR, Fishbane S, Agarwal R, Eschbach JW, Michael B, Folkert V, Batlle D, Trout JR, Dahl N, Myirski P, Strobos J, Warnock DG: Sodium ferric gluconate complex in hemodialysis patients. II. Adverse reactions in iron dextran-sensitive and dextran-tolerant patients. Kidney Int 63: 217–224, 2003
15. Folkert VW, Michael B, Agarwal R, Coyne DW, Dahl N, Myirski P, Warnock DG: Chronic use of sodium ferric gluconate complex in hemodialysis patients: Safety of higher-dose (> or =250 mg) administration. Am J Kidney Dis 41: 651–657, 2003
16. Michael B, Coyne DW, Folkert VW, Dahl NV, Warnock DG: Sodium ferric gluconate complex in haemodialysis patients: A prospective evaluation of long-term safety. Nephrol Dial Transplant 19: 1576–1580, 2004
    17. Charytan C, Schwenk MH, Al-Saloum MM, Spinowitz BS: Safety of iron sucrose in hemodialysis patients intolerant to other parenteral iron products. Nephron Clinical Practice 96: c63–c66, 2004
    18. Fishbane S: Safety in iron management. [see comment]. Am J Kidney Dis 41: 18–26, 2003
      19. Charytan C, Levin N, Al-Saloum M, Hafeez T, Gagnon S, Van Wyck DB: Efficacy and safety of iron sucrose for iron deficiency in patients with dialysis-associated anemia: North American clinical trial. Am J Kidney Dis 37: 300–307, 2001
      20. Van Wyck DB, Cavallo G, Spinowitz BS, Adhikarla R, Gagnon S, Charytan C, Levin N: Safety and efficacy of iron sucrose in patients sensitive to iron dextran: North American clinical trial. Am J Kidney Dis 36: 88–97, 2000
      21. Singh A, Patel T, Hertel J, Bernardo M, Kausz A, Brenner L: Safety of ferumoxytol in patients with anemia and CKD. Am J Kidney Dis 52: 907–915, 2008
      22. Michael B, Fishbane S, Coyne DW, Agarwal R, Warnock DG: Drug insight: Safety of intravenous iron supplementation with sodium ferric gluconate complex. Nat Clin Pract Nephrol 2: 92–100, 2006
        23. Chertow GM, Mason PD, Vaage-Nilsen O, Ahlmen J: Update on adverse drug events associated with parenteral iron. Nephrol Dial Transplant 21: 378–382, 2006
        24. Feldman HI, Santanna J, Guo W, Furst H, Franklin E, Joffe M, Marcus S, Faich G: Iron administration and clinical outcomes in hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 13: 734–744, 2002
        25. Feldman HI, Joffe M, Robinson B, Knauss J, Cizman B, Guo W, Franklin-Becker E, Faich G: Administration of parenteral iron and mortality among hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 15: 1623–1632, 2004
        26. Rozen-Zvi B, Gafter-Gvili A, Paul M, Leibovici L, Shpilberg O, Gafter U: Intravenous versus oral iron supplementation for the treatment of anemia in CKD: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis 52: 897–906, 2008
        27. Brewster UC: Intravenous iron therapy in end-stage renal disease. Semin Dial 19: 285–290, 2006
        28. Agarwal R, Vasavada N, Sachs NG, Chase S: Oxidative stress and renal injury with intravenous iron in patients with chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int 65: 2279–2289, 2004
        29. Lim CS, Vaziri ND: The effects of iron dextran on the oxidative stress in cardiovascular tissues of rats with chronic renal failure. Kidney Int 65: 1802–1809, 2004
          30. Leehey DJ, Palubiak DJ, Chebrolu S, Agarwal R: Sodium ferric gluconate causes oxidative stress but not acute renal injury in patients with chronic kidney disease: A pilot study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 20: 135–140, 2005
          31. Besarab A, Goodkin DA, Nissenson AR: The normal hematocrit study–follow-up. N Engl J Med 358: 433–434, 2008
          32. Food and Drug Administration: FDA Advisory Committee Briefing Document; Joint meeting of the Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee and the Drug Safety and Risk Management Committee; and errata,–4315b1–01-FDA.pdf and–4315b1–02-FDA-Errata%20.pdf, September 2007
          33. Coyne DW: From anemia trials to clinical practice: Understanding the risks and benefits when setting goals for therapy. Semin Dial 21: 212–216, 2008
          34. Ibrahim HN, Foley RN, Zhang R, Gilbertson DT, Collins AJ: Parenteral iron use: Possible contribution to exceeding target hemoglobin in hemodialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 4: 623–629, 2009
          Copyright © 2010 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.