Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

A prospective, randomized, study comparing early percutaneous dilational tracheotomy to prolonged translaryngeal intubation (delayed tracheotomy) in critically ill medical patients*

Rumbak, Mark J. MD; Newton, Michael MD; Truncale, Thomas DO; Schwartz, Skai W. PhD; Adams, James W MD; Hazard, Patrick B. MD

Erratum

In the article by Rumbak et al., published in the August 2004 issue of Critical Care Medicine , Figure 1 and its legend should appear as follows:

The authors regret the error.

Critical Care Medicine. 32(12):2566, December 2004.

doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000134835.05161.B6
Clinical Investigations
Buy
Erratum

Objective: The timing of tracheotomy in patients requiring mechanical ventilation is unknown. The effects of early percutaneous dilational tracheotomy compared with delayed tracheotomy in critically ill medical patients needing prolonged mechanical ventilation were assessed.

Design: Prospective, randomized study.

Setting: Medical intensive care units.

Patients: One hundred and twenty patients projected to need ventilation >14 days.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and Main Results: Patients were prospectively randomized to either early percutaneous tracheotomy within 48 hrs or delayed tracheotomy at days 14–16. Time in the intensive care unit and on mechanical ventilation and the cumulative frequency of pneumonia, mortality, and accidental extubation were documented. The airway was assessed for oral, labial, laryngeal, and tracheal damage. Early group showed significantly less mortality (31.7% vs. 61.7%), pneumonia (5% vs. 25%), and accidental extubations compared with the prolonged translaryngeal group (0 vs. 6). The early tracheotomy group spent less time in the intensive care unit (4.8 ± 1.4 vs. 16.2 ± 3.8 days) and on mechanical ventilation (7.6 ± 2.0 vs. 17.4 ± 5.3 days). There was also significantly more damage to mouth and larynx in the prolonged translaryngeal intubation group.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the benefits of early tracheotomy outweigh the risks of prolonged translaryngeal intubation. It gives credence to the practice of subjecting this group of critically ill medical patients to early tracheotomy rather than delayed tracheotomy.

From the Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Occupation Medicine, Tampa General Hospital and the James A. Haley VA Hospital, (MJR, MN, TT), and the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (SWS), both of the University of South Florida Health Science Center, Tampa, Florida; and the Department of Medicine at the Baptist Hospital and the University of Tennessee, Memphis, TN (JWA, PBH).

Supported, in part, by a grant from SIMS Portex (Keene, NH)

Presented, in part, at the American College of Chest Physician, San Francisco, October 2000.

Address requests for reprints to: Mark J. Rumbak, MD, Department of Medicine, Pulmonary, Critical Care and Occupational Medicine (IIIC), James A. Haley Veterans Hospital, 13000 Bruce B. Downs Blvd., Tampa, Florida 33612. E-mail: dmrumcake@AOL.com

© 2004 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins