Journal Logo

Feature Articles

Alterations in Skin Blood Flow at the Fingertip Are Related to Mortality in Patients With Circulatory Shock

Mongkolpun, Wasineenart MD; Orbegozo, Diego MD; Cordeiro, Carolina P. R. MD; Franco, Claudio J. C. S. MD; Vincent, Jean-Louis MD, PhD, FCCM; Creteur, Jacques MD, PhD

Author Information
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004177

Abstract

Circulatory shock, recognized as arterial hypotension with signs of tissue hypoperfusion (1), leads to abnormal cellular oxygen availability and organ dysfunction (1). Alterations in skin perfusion can occur early in patients with shock, even before global hemodynamic variables are altered (2–6), and remain altered despite hemodynamic stabilization after resuscitation (6–10). Therefore, any alteration in skin perfusion could be a valuable alarm signal (4,5). However, evaluation of peripheral perfusion at the bedside remains challenging. Clinical assessment, for example, using the capillary refill time (CRT) or the mottling score, has been used, but remains subjective.

The CRT measures the time required for a distal capillary bed to regain its color after pressure has been applied to cause blanching. Alterations in capillary perfusion prolong the time needed for distal capillaries to refill with blood, leading to longer CRTs. Although the criteria for prolonged CRT are debatable (11), it has been associated with high blood lactate concentrations (12), more severe organ dysfunction (7) and increased ICU mortality (7–9,12). CRT assessment can be influenced by many factors, including the degree of pressure applied and ambient light and temperature, and there is poor interobserver agreement in those with limited training or without a chronometer (13–15). Nevertheless, precise CRT examination using chronometry was shown to be at least as good as serial blood lactate levels as a resuscitation target (16).

The presence of mottling, patchy skin discoloration that usually starts around the knees and is believed to reflect abnormal skin perfusion, has been related to worse outcomes (17). Ait-Oufella et al (10) developed a mottling score, in which the extent of mottling on the legs was scaled from 0 to 5, and reported that higher scores were associated with increased 14-day mortality in patients with septic shock and that patients whose mottling score decreased during resuscitation had better outcomes. However, mottling can persist up to 3 hours after initial treatment of circulatory shock (17), limiting its use to guide resuscitation.

Because of the difficulties in reliably assessing skin perfusion by clinical evaluation, several techniques have been developed to more precisely quantify peripheral perfusion, including transcutaneous monitoring of carbon dioxide and oxygen tensions using cutaneous electrodes (2), monitoring of muscle oxygen saturation using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) (4,18–20), and assessment of skin blood flow (SBF) using skin laser Doppler (SLD) (21–23).

SBF monitoring using SLD is an attractive technology because of its noninvasive character and simplicity (21–23). An interesting approach is to measure SBF while local skin temperature is increased (thermal challenge test), thus evaluating endothelial vasodilatory function (24–29). We previously showed that a decrease in the microcirculatory recruitment capabilities of forearm SBF after a thermal challenge test was related to worse outcomes in patients with circulatory shock (22). To investigate the value of this technique further using the same area as is used in CRT monitoring, we decided to measure SBF at the fingertip using SLD and to explore whether the variables measured were associated with outcome in patients with circulatory shock. Although there is some evidence (26,27) to suggest that impairment of SBF at the fingertip measured using SLD is correlated with severity of disease, these studies were conducted in patients with systemic sclerosis and no studies have been performed in circulatory shock. We hypothesized that a blunted fingertip SBF response to a thermal challenge would be associated with increased mortality in patients with circulatory shock.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study was conducted between October 2015 and July 2017 in our 35-bed Department of Intensive Care. Local ethical committee approval was obtained (protocol number P2015/365/B406201525438) and informed consent was signed by the volunteers and patients or their next of kin.

All adult ICU admissions during the study period were screened. Patients were eligible if they fulfilled the following criteria for circulatory shock: need for norepinephrine to maintain a mean arterial pressure (MAP) greater than or equal to 65 mm Hg with at least one sign of poor tissue perfusion (mottled skin, altered level of consciousness, oliguria) and an arterial lactate concentration greater than or equal to 2 mmol/L. We only included patients within the first 12 hours after the onset of shock. We excluded patients with any of the following criteria: presence of any skin lesion that rendered study measurements difficult, a previous history of Raynaud’s phenomenon (26), a previous diagnosis of systemic sclerosis (27) or peripheral vascular disease, or previous inclusion in this study. Volunteers were recruited from the hospital personnel for convenience, using the same exclusion criteria.

SBF Measurements

SBF was evaluated using a SLD device (PeriFlux System 5000; Perimed, Jarfalla, Sweden) with a small thermostatic SLD probe (Reference number 457, Perimed; Fig. S1, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/CCM/F265). This probe allows SBF measurement and for the temperature at the place where it is positioned to be changed. The probe is attached to the skin with the aid of double-sided tape. The emitted laser beam has a wavelength of 780 nm, which allows evaluation of a depth between 0.5 and 1.0 mm under the skin. The back-scattered light is collected by the probe and the shift in light wavelength is proportional to the RBC velocity in the studied skin area, thus providing a noninvasive measurement of SBF expressed as arbitrary perfusion units (APUs).

Volunteers were studied once in the supine position. They were asked to rest calmly for 30 minutes before the measurements and to refrain from any movement during the measurements. In patients, SBF was measured as soon as possible (baseline) after the identification of circulatory shock and 6, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours thereafter. Patients were asked not to move their fingers during measurements. If a patient became agitated during the procedure, the measurements were repeated as soon as possible after the patient had settled.

At each time point, the thermostatic probe was positioned on the tip of the index finger, and the basal SBF (SBFBT) and basal temperature (T) were recorded after 3 minutes. The skin probe temperature was then immediately increased to 37°C, and the SBF (SBF37) was again recorded after 3 minutes. Data were registered continuously for future off-line analyses using PeriSoft software 2.5.5 (Perimed). To standardize the change in SBF by the change in temperature, we calculated the ΔSBF/ΔT as (SBF37–SBFBT)/(37–basal temperature).

Protocol and Data Collection

Patients with circulatory shock were managed according to current guidelines (30) by a team of intensivists different from those who performed the SLD measurements. Demographic data were collected at admission. We recorded the presence of mechanical ventilation at study inclusion and the need for renal replacement therapies during the first 24 hours after inclusion. The type of shock was classified as septic or nonseptic (cardiogenic or hypovolemic). At each SBF time-point, hemodynamic variables and blood gas analyses were obtained, the peripheral perfusion index (PPI) was recorded from the bedside monitor (IntelliVue MP70 monitor; Philips Medical Systems, Boblingen, Germany) and the CRT assessed on the opposite hand to that used for SBF measurements. CRT was determined by applying pressure to the tip of the finger for at least 15 seconds until the skin showed whitening; the time until return of baseline coloration after release of the pressure was measured with a chronometer.

The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score (31) was calculated using the worst data during the first 24 hours in the ICU and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (32) was calculated at admission and at each SBF measurement point. Survival status was recorded at ICU discharge.

Statistical Analysis

Variables were assessed for normality of distribution using a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and data are presented as median (25–75th percentiles) or mean with sd as appropriate. The differences between groups were assessed using a chi-square test, Fisher exact test, Mann-Whitney U test, analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni post hoc analysis, or Kruskal-Wallis test as appropriate. We also grouped patients according to interquartile ranges of initial SOFA score and lactate concentration to assess the association between SBF and these variables. ANOVA was used to evaluate the time course of SBF between groups (survivors vs nonsurvivors, sepsis vs nonsepsis). We plotted sensitivity and specificity using a receiving operating characteristics (ROCs) graph, and the area under the ROC curve (AUROC) was calculated for the different variables as a measure of their ability to predict ICU mortality. AUROCs are presented as means with 95% CI and compared using the Hanley and McNeil method. To assess correlations of possible variables with the different SBF-derived variables, we plotted individual data on graphs and calculated the Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficient (r) as appropriate. A two-sided p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed using STATA 15.0 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX).

RESULTS

Of the 74 patients who met the inclusion criteria during the study period, four refused to participate, so 70 were studied. Patients were older than the healthy volunteers (Table 1). All patients had reached an MAP greater than or equal to 65 mm Hg by the time of the baseline measurements. Twenty-nine patients died (41%) in the ICU, five within the 96-hour study period. The cause of death was multiple organ failure for all patients. Two patients became severely agitated during the test and their SBF measurements were delayed by 20 minutes at T6 and T24, respectively. Initial blood lactate concentration, APACHE II score and SOFA score were higher in the nonsurvivors than in the survivors (Table 2). MAP, cardiac index (CI), and central venous oxygen saturation (Scvo2) were not significantly different in survivors and nonsurvivors (Table 2). Lactate levels decreased in the first 6 hours in survivors and nonsurvivors and remained relatively stable thereafter (Fig. S2, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/CCM/F265).

TABLE 1.
TABLE 1.:
Baseline Skin Blood Flow at Basal Temperature (SBFBT) and at 37°C (SBF37) and Response to Thermal Challenge Test (ΔSBF/ΔT) in Healthy Volunteers and Patients in Circulatory Shock
TABLE 2.
TABLE 2.:
Baseline Clinical Characteristics of Survivors and Nonsurvivors in Patients With Circulatory Shocka

SBF and SBF-Derived Variables

SBFBT, SBF37, ΔSBF/ΔT ratio, and finger temperature were lower in the patients at baseline than in the healthy volunteers (Table 1).

In the patients, SBFBT (Fig. 1A), SBF37 (Fig. S3, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/CCM/F265), and ΔSBF/ΔT ratio (Fig. 1B) were lower in the nonsurvivors than in the survivors at baseline (Table 2) and throughout the study period. Finger temperature was also lower in the nonsurvivors than in the survivors throughout the study (Fig. S4, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/CCM/F265).

Figure 1.
Figure 1.:
Skin blood flow (SBF) and thermal challenge response (ΔSBF/ΔT) during the study period in survivors and nonsurvivors. A, SBF. B, ΔSBF/ΔT. Data are expressed as medians with 95% CIs. *p < 0.05 versus survivors; a p < 0.05 versus baseline in the same group; b p < 0.05 versus the indicated time point within the same group; #p < 0.05 versus volunteers. APU = arbitrary perfusion units.

In survivors, SBFBT (Fig. 1A) was significantly higher than the value at baseline from 6 hours. SBF37 (Fig. S3, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/CCM/F265) and the ΔSBF/ΔT ratio (Fig. 1B) increased significantly in survivors from 24 hours compared with baseline. SBFBT, SBF37, and ΔSBF/ΔT in survivors and nonsurvivors remained below values in healthy volunteers at all time points (p < 0.01). These patterns were similar in septic and nonseptic shock subgroups (Figs. S5 and S6, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/CCM/F265)

Baseline median CRT was higher in the nonsurvivors than in the survivors (Table 2) but decreased to less than 2 seconds in survivors and nonsurvivors during the first 6 hours after inclusion (data not shown). Three of the nonsurvivors had a CRT greater than or equal to 4 seconds for more than 6 hours after inclusion. There was no significant difference in baseline PPI between the survivors and the nonsurvivors but PPI was higher in the survivors than in the nonsurvivors at T6 and T24 (Fig. S7, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/CCM/F265).

Correlations Between SBF, Other Variables, and Mortality

At study inclusion, there was a weak but significant correlation between SBF and blood lactate level (r = 0.26; p = 0.01) and SOFA score (r = 0.29; p < 0.01), but not with the APACHE II score (r = 0.28; p = 0.1), MAP (r = 0.1; p = 0.2), CI (r = 0.2; p = 0.1; Fig. S8, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/CCM/F265), or norepinephrine dose (r = 0.2; p = 0.3; Fig. S9, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/CCM/F265).

When the patients were grouped by interquartile range of initial SOFA score and lactate concentrations, patients with the highest SOFA scores and lactate concentrations had the lowest SBF values. Within each interquartile range of SOFA score and lactate concentrations, SBFs were lower in the nonsurvivors than in the survivors (Fig. 2).

Figure 2.
Figure 2.:
Median baseline skin blood flow (SBF) for different quartiles of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and blood lactate level. Median baseline SBF for different quartiles of SOFA score in all patients (A) and in survivors and nonsurvivors (B). Median baseline SBF for different quartiles of lactate level in all patients (C) and in survivors and nonsurvivors (D). Data are expressed as medians with 95% CIs. *p < 0.05 between quartiles, #p < 0.05 versus survivors. APU = arbitrary perfusion units.

The AUROC for baseline ΔSBF/ΔT ratio and SBF were higher than those for blood lactate (p < 0.01), Scvo2 (p < 0.01), CRT (p < 0.01), and PPI (area under the curve 0.51; p < 0.01) for predicting ICU mortality (Fig. 3). Baseline ΔSBF/ΔT ratio had a greater AUROC than baseline SBF (p = 0.02) with cutoff values less than or equal to 1.25 APU/°C (sensitivity 88%, specificity 89%) and less than or equal to 21 APU (sensitivity 84%, specificity 81%), respectively.

Figure 3.
Figure 3.:
Prediction of ICU mortality by baseline variables. AUC = area under the curve, CRT = capillary refill time, SBF = skin blood flow, Scvo2 = central venous oxygen saturation, ΔSBF/ΔT = thermal challenge response.

Similar results were obtained in patients with and without septic shock (Figs. S10 and S11, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/CCM/F265).

DISCUSSION

In this prospective study, SBF was altered in patients with circulatory shock compared with healthy volunteers, even though the patients were hemodynamically stabilized, with MAP greater than or equal to 65 mm Hg. SBF at baseline was related to the SOFA score and initial lactate concentration, but not to MAP or CI. SBF was lower in nonsurvivors than in survivors at baseline and throughout the study period. Furthermore, the nonsurvivors had a persistently blunted SBF response to the thermal challenge test, reported as the ΔSBF/ΔT ratio. Baseline SBF and ΔSBF/ΔT were both predictive of ICU mortality.

During the initial phase of circulatory shock, skin perfusion is reduced in order to preserve blood flow to vital organs (2–6). This alteration is usually present before the deterioration of hemodynamic variables and is reversed quite late during resuscitation; it may persist even when systemic variables seem to have returned to acceptable values (2–6,33,34), as shown in the current study, and has been related to an unfavorable course and increased mortality (7–11). Monitoring of peripheral perfusion could therefore help to detect occult perfusion deficits.

The evolution of peripheral perfusion variables during resuscitation may be even more important than baseline values. Our results are consistent with results from studies by Ait-Oufella et al (8) and Hernandez et al (9) who reported that prolonged CRT was related to mortality, although our patients were less severely ill than in those studies. The patients in the studies by Ait-Oufella et al (8) and Hernandez et al (9) had lactate levels of 4.5 mmol/L and 3.3 mmol/L (1.6–4.5 mmol/L), respectively, versus 2.9 mmol/L (2.3–4.1 mmol/L) in the present study and CRT values of 3.5 seconds and 5 seconds (2–6 s), versus 2 seconds (1–3 s). Hernandez et al (9) demonstrated that the recovery of CRT to normal values within 6 hours was associated with successful resuscitation, which they defined as a blood lactate concentration less than 2 mmol/L in the 24 hours after resuscitation. A recent multicenter study showed that there was less organ dysfunction in the 72 hours after resuscitation in patients in whom CRT normalized during the treatment of circulatory shock (16). In our study, there was a significant increase in SBF in the first 6 hours after resuscitation only in survivors, suggesting that the recovery of SBF during the treatment of circulatory shock may be associated with the severity of disease. Furthermore, this change in SBF could not be detected by systemic variables and was similar regardless of the etiology of shock (septic vs nonseptic). This disparity between microcirculatory and global systemic variables has been reported previously using other techniques, such as NIRS (18,19,35) and PPI (36,37).

One may argue that the higher dose of norepinephrine in nonsurvivors than in survivors could have reduced fingertip SBF because of the activation of alpha-receptors resulting in peripheral vasoconstriction. However, norepinephrine dose and SBF were not correlated. Similar findings have been reported in the thenar muscle with NIRS (38) and the sublingual area using side stream dark-field imaging (39,40).

SBF measurement coupled with a thermal challenge test can be applied to evaluate the capillary vasodilation induced by a temporary increase in skin temperature (27–29). The response to a thermal challenge test requires good capillary endothelial function so that the SBF can increase during the rise in skin temperature (27–29,41,42). This test is usually performed at temperatures of 43°C on the forearm to obtain a maximal vasodilatory effect (27–29,41,42), but we used 37°C instead of 43°C for several reasons. First, in patients with endothelial dysfunction, such as those in circulatory shock, a thermal challenge test at temperatures greater than 40°C may cause skin burn (25,26) and, in our experience (unpublished), patients complain of a burning sensation in the finger with a temperature of 43°C. Second, in patients with septic shock, Vallée et al (43) reported altered cutaneous blood flow, evaluated by Pco2 monitoring on the ear lobe at 37°C, with changes more severe in nonsurvivors than in survivors.

We demonstrated that the response to the thermal challenge test (ΔSBF/ΔT) at 37°C was greater in survivors than in nonsurvivors both at baseline and subsequently and was not related to systemic variables. Furthermore, we observed an improvement in the ΔSBF/ΔT in the first 24 hours in the survivors, suggesting that the evolution of ΔSBF/ΔT is linked to disease severity. Additionally, there was no difference in ΔSBF/ΔT between patients with septic and nonseptic shock, suggesting that the capillary vasodilatory effect was similar in different types of circulatory shock.

ΔSBF/ΔT was more accurate at predicting ICU mortality than SBF at basal temperature (about 28°C). Nevertheless, the change in ΔSBF/ΔT occurred later than the change in SBF. SBF measurement at basal temperatures may therefore be the better variable for monitoring peripheral tissue perfusion during resuscitation so that treatments can be adjusted rapidly.

Our study has several limitations. First, it was a single-center study, limiting its external validity. However, this reduced any effect of variability in the treatment of shock that may have occurred if several centers had been involved. Second, the volunteers were younger than the patients, which may have affected the results. Tsuchida (44) demonstrated that SBF on the dorsum of the hand was 30% lower in elderly (age 70 yr) than in younger (age 20 yr) healthy volunteers. By contrast, Vionnet et al (45) observed no age-related differences on the forearm. These different results suggest that age-related change in SBF may depend on the area studied, but this needs further investigation. Third, although we excluded patients and volunteers with a history of peripheral vascular disease as this may interfere with the vasodilatory response to local hyperthermia (thermal challenge test) (46), we have no information on the smoking history of patients or volunteers, which may also potentially impact on the results (47,48).

To our knowledge, these are the first observations describing the evolution of fingertip SBF measurements using SLD during circulatory shock and reporting a persistently blunted response to a thermal challenge test in nonsurvivors. Further study is needed to determine whether the SLD technique could be used to detect an improvement in peripheral perfusion during initial fluid administration and thus guide fluid resuscitation.

CONCLUSIONS

SBF measured by SLD was altered in patients with circulatory shock and the magnitude of this alteration was proportional to the SOFA score and to lactate levels and predictive of ICU mortality. SBF evaluation by SLD may be a valuable tool for monitoring tissue perfusion in circulatory shock.

REFERENCES

1. Vincent JL, De Backer D. Circulatory shock. N Engl J Med 2013; 369:1726–1734
2. Chien LC, Lu KJ, Wo CC, et al. Hemodynamic patterns preceding circulatory deterioration and death after trauma. J Trauma 2007; 62:928–932
3. van Genderen ME, Bartels SA, Lima A, et al. Peripheral perfusion index as an early predictor for central hypovolemia in awake healthy volunteers. Anesth Analg 2013; 116:351–356
4. Orbegozo D, Su F, Xie K, et al. Peripheral muscle near-infrared spectroscopy variables are altered early in septic shock. Shock 2018; 50:87–95
5. Lima A, Bakker J. Clinical monitoring of peripheral perfusion: There is more to learn. Crit Care 2014; 18:113
6. Beerthuizen GI, Goris RJ, Kreuzer FJ. Skeletal muscle Po2 during imminent shock. Arch Emerg Med 1989; 6:172–182
7. Lima A, Jansen TC, van Bommel J, et al. The prognostic value of the subjective assessment of peripheral perfusion in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 2009; 37:934–938
8. Ait-Oufella H, Bige N, Boelle PY, et al. Capillary refill time exploration during septic shock. Intensive Care Med 2014; 40:958–964
9. Hernandez G, Pedreros C, Veas E, et al. Evolution of peripheral vs metabolic perfusion parameters during septic shock resuscitation. A clinical-physiologic study. J Crit Care 2012; 27:283–288
10. Ait-Oufella H, Lemoinne S, Boelle PY, et al. Mottling score predicts survival in septic shock. Intensive Care Med 2011; 37:801–807
11. Schriger DL, Baraff L. Defining normal capillary refill: Variation with age, sex, and temperature. Ann Emerg Med 1988; 17:932–935
12. Morimura N, Takahashi K, Doi T, et al. A pilot study of quantitative capillary refill time to identify high blood lactate levels in critically ill patients. Emerg Med J 2015; 32:444–448
13. Espinoza ED, Welsh S, Dubin A. Lack of agreement between different observers and methods in the measurement of capillary refill time in healthy volunteers: An observational study. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva 2014; 26:269–276
14. Anderson B, Kelly A, Kerr D, et al. Capillary refill time in adults has poor inter-observer agreement. Hong Kong J Emerg Med 2008; 15:71–74
15. Pickard A, Karlen W, Ansermino JM. Capillary refill time: Is it still a useful clinical sign? Anesth Analg 2011; 113:120–123
16. Hernández G, Ospina-Tascón GA, Damiani LP, et al.; The ANDROMEDA SHOCK Investigators and the Latin America Intensive Care Network (LIVEN): Effect of a resuscitation strategy targeting peripheral perfusion status vs serum lactate levels on 28-day mortality among patients with septic shock: The ANDROMEDA-SHOCK randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2019; 321:654–664
17. Coudroy R, Jamet A, Frat JP, et al. Incidence and impact of skin mottling over the knee and its duration on outcome in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 2015; 41:452–459
18. Shapiro NI, Arnold R, Sherwin R, et al.; Emergency Medicine Shock Research Network (EMShockNet): The association of near-infrared spectroscopy-derived tissue oxygenation measurements with sepsis syndromes, organ dysfunction and mortality in emergency department patients with sepsis. Crit Care 2011; 15:R223
19. Orbegozo Cortés D, Puflea F, De Backer D, et al. Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) to assess the effects of local ischemic preconditioning in the muscle of healthy volunteers and critically ill patients. Microvasc Res 2015; 102:25–32
20. Ait-Oufella H, Joffre J, Boelle PY, et al. Knee area tissue oxygen saturation is predictive of 14-day mortality in septic shock. Intensive Care Med 2012; 38:976–983
21. Young JD, Cameron EM. Dynamics of skin blood flow in human sepsis. Intensive Care Med 1995; 21:669–674
22. Orbegozo D, Mongkolpun W, Stringari G, et al. Skin microcirculatory reactivity assessed using a thermal challenge is decreased in patients with circulatory shock and associated with outcome. Ann Intensive Care 2018; 8:60
23. Salgado MA, Salgado-Filho MF, Reis-Brito JO, et al. Effectiveness of laser Doppler perfusion monitoring in the assessment of microvascular function in patients undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2014; 28:1211–1216
24. Song CW, Chelstrom LM, Haumschild DJ. Changes in human skin blood flow by hyperthermia. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1990; 18:903–907
25. Boignard A, Salvat-Melis M, Carpentier PH, et al. Local hyperemia to heating is impaired in secondary Raynaud’s phenomenon. Arthritis Res Ther 2005; 7:R1103–R1112
26. Barbano B, Marra AM, Quarta S, et al. In systemic sclerosis skin perfusion of hands is reduced and may predict the occurrence of new digital ulcers. Microvasc Res 2017; 110:1–4
27. Cracowski JL, Minson CT, Salvat-Melis M, et al. Methodological issues in the assessment of skin microvascular endothelial function in humans. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2006; 27:503–508
28. Roustit M, Cracowski JL. Non-invasive assessment of skin microvascular function in humans: An insight into methods. Microcirculation 2012; 19:47–64
29. Minson CT. Thermal provocation to evaluate microvascular reactivity in human skin. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2010; 109:1239–1246
30. Cecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M, et al. Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 2014; 40:1795–1815
31. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, et al. APACHE II: A severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985; 13:818–829
32. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 1996; 22:707–710
33. Guzman JA, Dikin MS, Kruse JA. Lingual, splanchnic, and systemic hemodynamic and carbon dioxide tension changes during endotoxic shock and resuscitation. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2005; 98:108–113
34. Guzman JA, Lacoma FJ, Kruse JA. Relationship between systemic oxygen supply dependency and gastric intramucosal PCO2 during progressive hemorrhage. J Trauma 1998; 44:696–700
35. Lima A, van Bommel J, Sikorska K, et al. The relation of near-infrared spectroscopy with changes in peripheral circulation in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 2011; 39:1649–1654
36. He HW, Liu DW, Long Y, et al. The peripheral perfusion index and transcutaneous oxygen challenge test are predictive of mortality in septic patients after resuscitation. Crit Care 2013; 17:R116
37. He H, Long Y, Liu D, et al. Clinical classification of tissue perfusion based on the central venous oxygen saturation and the peripheral perfusion index. Crit Care 2015; 19:330
38. Georger JF, Hamzaoui O, Chaari A, et al. Restoring arterial pressure with norepinephrine improves muscle tissue oxygenation assessed by near-infrared spectroscopy in severely hypotensive septic patients. Intensive Care Med 2010; 36:1882–1889
39. Dubin A, Pozo MO, Casabella CA, et al. Increasing arterial blood pressure with norepinephrine does not improve microcirculatory blood flow: A prospective study. Crit Care 2009; 13:R92
40. Jhanji S, Stirling S, Patel N, et al. The effect of increasing doses of norepinephrine on tissue oxygenation and microvascular flow in patients with septic shock. Crit Care Med 2009; 37:1961–1966
41. Del Pozzi AT, Hodges GJ. To reheat, or to not reheat: That is the question: The efficacy of a local reheating protocol on mechanisms of cutaneous vasodilatation. Microvasc Res 2015; 97:47–54
42. Taylor WF, Johnson JM, O’Leary D, et al. Effect of high local temperature on reflex cutaneous vasodilation. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol 1984; 57:191–196
43. Vallée F, Mateo J, Dubreuil G, et al. Cutaneous ear lobe Pco2 at 37°C to evaluate microperfusion in patients with septic shock. Chest 2010; 138:1062–1070
44. Tsuchida Y. Age-related changes in skin blood flow at four anatomic sites of the body in males studied by xenon-133. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 85:556–561
45. Vionnet J, Calero-Romero I, Heim A, et al. No major impact of skin aging on the response of skin blood flow to a submaximal local thermal stimulus. Microcirculation 2014; 21:730–737
46. Karanfilian RG, Lynch TG, Lee BC, et al. The assessment of skin blood flow in peripheral vascular disease by laser Doppler velocimetry. Am Surg 1984; 50:641–644
47. Pellaton C, Kubli S, Feihl F, et al. Blunted vasodilatory responses in the cutaneous microcirculation of cigarette smokers. Am Heart J 2002; 144:269–274
48. Dalla Vecchia L, Palombo C, Ciardetti M, et al. Contrasting effects of acute and chronic cigarette smoking on skin microcirculation in young healthy subjects. J Hypertens 2004; 22:129–135
Keywords:

laser Doppler flowmetry; microcirculation; peripheral tissue perfusion; skin reactivity; thermal challenge

Supplemental Digital Content

Copyright © 2020 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.