To employ automated bed data to examine whether ICU occupancy influences ICU admission decisions and patient outcomes.
Retrospective study using an instrumental variable to remove biases from unobserved differences in illness severity for patients admitted to ICU.
Fifteen hospitals in an integrated healthcare delivery system in California.
Seventy thousand one hundred thirty-three episodes involving patients admitted via emergency departments to a medical service over a 1-year period between 2008 and 2009.
A third of patients admitted via emergency department to a medical service were admitted under high ICU congestion (more than 90% of beds occupied). High ICU congestion was associated with a 9% lower likelihood of ICU admission for patients defined as eligible for ICU admission. We further found strong associations between ICU admission and patient outcomes, with a 32% lower likelihood of hospital readmission if the first inpatient unit was an ICU. Similarly, hospital length of stay decreased by 33% and likelihood of transfer to ICU from other units—including ICU readmission if the first unit was an ICU—decreased by 73%.
High ICU congestion is associated with a lower likelihood of ICU admission, which has important operational implications and can affect patient outcomes. By taking advantage of our ability to identify a subset of patients whose ICU admission decisions are affected by congestion, we found that, if congestion were not a barrier and more eligible patients were admitted to ICU, this hospital system could save approximately 7.5 hospital readmissions and 253.8 hospital days per year. These findings could help inform future capacity planning and staffing decisions.
1Data Sciences and Operations, Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
2Decision, Risk, and Operations Division, Columbia Business School, New York, NY.
3Departamento de Ingenieria Industrial, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
4Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Division of Research, Oakland, CA.
5Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Department of Inpatient Pediatrics, Walnut Creek, CA.
*See also p. 1936.
Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal’s website (http://journals.lww.com/ccmjournal).
Supported, in part, by the National Science Foundation.
Dr. Chan’s institution received funding from the National Science Foundation, grant NSF-CMMI-1350059. Dr. Olivares' institution received funding from the National Fund for Scientific and Technological Development (Conicyt, Chile), grant FONDECYT-1120898. Dr. Escobar received support for article research and disclosed other support (over the 36-month period, he has received funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH); the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation; Merck, Sharp, & Dohme; and Astra Zeneca-Medimmune. All of these were grants with formal contracts and with approval from the Kaiser Permanente Northern California Institutional Review Board. Under his contract with The Permanente Medical Group, he is not allowed to have any outside income, nor is he allowed to perform paid consulting or participate in advisory boards, etc.). His institution received funding from the National Science Foundation, grant NSF-CMMI 1350059; the NIH; the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation; and Merck, Sharp, & Dohme. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
For information regarding this article, E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org