To clarify the effect of progressively increasing intra-abdominal pressure on esophageal pressure, transpulmonary pressure, and functional residual capacity.
Controlled application of increased intra-abdominal pressure at two positive end-expiratory pressure levels (1 and 10 cm H2O) in an anesthetized porcine model of controlled ventilation.
Large animal laboratory of a university-affiliated hospital.
Eleven deeply anesthetized swine (weight 46.2 ± 6.2 kg).
Air-regulated intra-abdominal hypertension (0–25 mm Hg).
Esophageal pressure, tidal compliance, bladder pressure, and end-expiratory lung aeration by gas dilution.
Functional residual capacity was significantly reduced by increasing intra-abdominal pressure at both positive end-expiratory pressure levels (p ≤ 0.0001) without corresponding changes of end-expiratory esophageal pressure. Above intra-abdominal pressure 5 mm Hg, plateau airway pressure increased linearly by ~ 50% of the applied intra-abdominal pressure value, associated with commensurate changes of esophageal pressure. With tidal volume held constant, negligible changes occurred in transpulmonary pressure due to intra-abdominal pressure. Driving pressures calculated from airway pressures alone (plateau airway pressure – positive end-expiratory pressure) did not equate to those computed from transpulmonary pressure (tidal changes in transpulmonary pressure). Increasing positive end-expiratory pressure shifted the predominantly negative end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure at positive end-expiratory pressure 1 cm H2O (mean –3.5 ± 0.4 cm H2O) into the positive range at positive end-expiratory pressure 10 cm H2O (mean 0.58 ± 1.2 cm H2O).
Despite its insensitivity to changes in functional residual capacity, measuring transpulmonary pressure may be helpful in explaining how different levels of positive end-expiratory pressure influence recruitment and collapse during tidal ventilation in the presence of increased intra-abdominal pressure and in calculating true transpulmonary driving pressure (tidal changes of transpulmonary pressure). Traditional interpretations of respiratory mechanics based on unmodified airway pressure were misleading regarding lung behavior in this setting.
1Department of Medicine, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Research, University of Minnesota, Regions Hospital, Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN.
2Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Research, Regions Hospital, St. Paul, MN.
3Health Partners Research Foundation, Regions Hospital, St. Paul, MN.
4HealthPartners Institute for Education and Research, Minneapolis, MN.
5Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Regions Hospital, St. Paul, MN.
6Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Minnesota, Regions Hospital, St. Paul, MN.
*See also p. 2036.
Supported, in part, by GE-HealthCare and HealthPartners Research Foundation.
Dr. Marini received grant support from GE Healthcare (investigator-initiated grant to study asymmetrical disorders of lung and chest wall). The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
For information regarding this article, E-mail: Alex.B.Adams@HealthPartners.com