Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Outcomes in severe sepsis and patients with septic shock: Pathogen species and infection sites are not associated with mortality*

Zahar, Jean-Ralph MD; Timsit, Jean-Francois MD, PhD; Garrouste-Orgeas, Maïté MD; Français, Adrien MG; Vesim, Aurélien MG; Descorps-Declere, Adrien MD; Dubois, Yohann MD; Souweine, Bertrand MD; Haouache, Hakim MD; Goldgran-Toledano, Dany MD; Allaouchiche, Bernard MD; Azoulay, Elie MD, PhD; Adrie, Christophe MD


In the article on page 1886 of the August issue, an author's name was misspelled. The fifth author should have been: Aurélien Vesin.

Critical Care Medicine. 39(10):2392, October 2011.

doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31821b827c
Clinical Investigations

Objectives: We evaluated the respective influence of the causative pathogen and infection site on hospital mortality from severe sepsis related to community-, hospital-, and intensive care unit-acquired infections.

Design: We used a prospective observational cohort 10-yr database. We built a subdistribution hazards model with corrections for competing risks and adjustment for potential confounders including early appropriate antimicrobial therapy.

Setting: Twelve intensive care units.

Patients: We included 4,006 first episodes of acquisition-site-specific severe sepsis in 3,588 patients.

Inteventions: None.

Measurements and Main Results: We included 1562 community-acquired, 1432 hospital-acquired, and 1012 intensive care unit-acquired episodes of severe sepsis. After adjustment, we found no independent associations of the causative organism, multidrug resistance of the causative organism, infection site, or presence of bacteremia with mortality. Early appropriate antimicrobial therapy was consistently associated with better survival in the community-acquired (0.64 [0.51–0.8], p = .0001), hospital-acquired (0.72 [0.58–0.88], p = .0011), and intensive care unit-acquired (0.79 [0.64–0.97], p = .0272) groups.

Conclusion: The infectious process may not exert as strong a prognostic effect when severity, organ dysfunction and, above all, appropriateness of early antimicrobials are taken into account. Our findings emphasize the importance of developing valid recommendations for early antimicrobial therapy.


From the Infection Control Unit (J-RZ), Necker University Hospital Paris, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; INSERM U823 (J-FT, AV), Albert Bonniot Research Center, Team 11: “Outcome of Cancers and Critical Illnesses,” La Tronche, France; the Medical–Surgical ICU (MG-O, AF), Saint Joseph Hospital, Paris, France; the Surgical Intensive Care Unit (AD-D), Antoine Béclère Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Clamart, France; the Medical Intensive Care Unit (J-FT, YD), Albert Michallon Teaching Hospital, Joseph Fournier University, Grenoble, France; the Medical ICU (BS), Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Clemont-Ferrand, France; the Medical ICU (HH), Jean Verdier University Hospital, Bondy, France; the Medical–Surgical ICU (DG-T), Gonesse Hospital, Gonesse, France; the Surgical ICU (BA), Edouard Herriot University Hospital, Lyon, France; the Medical Intensive Care Unit (EA), Saint Louis University Hospital, Paris, France; and the Physiology Department (CA), Cochin University Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, the University of René Descartes, Paris, France.

This article was written on behalf of the OUTCOMEREA Study Group.

Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal's Web site (

Dr. Azoulay consulted with Pfizer (France) and received honoraria/speaking fees and a grant from Pfizer (Gilead). The remaining authors have not disclosed any potential conflicts of interest.

For information regarding this article, E-mail:

© 2011 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins