Journal Logo

Editorial

Channeling a New Focus for Heart Failure: Insights Into Ion Channels

Pitt, Geoffrey S MD, PhD

Author Information
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology: August 2009 - Volume 54 - Issue 2 - p 95-97
doi: 10.1097/FJC.0b013e3181b2b6bd
  • Free

Over 500,000 new patients in the United States develop heart failure (HF) annually and sudden cardiac death (SCD) has become a dominant problem in HF management.1 Successful development of pharmacologic therapies that target neurohormonal abnormalities and modulate disease progression has changed the major cause of death in patients with HF from progressive pump failure to SCD from cardiac arrhythmias. What underlies the increased risk of SCD in patients with HF is only partially understood. Although it is clear that underlying scar and fibrosis serves as a powerful arrhythmogenic substrate in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, extensive work over the past decade has shown that the failing ventricle undergoes significant electrical remodeling2; that is, the expression of some ion channels increases and expression of others is suppressed. This is of utmost clinical importance, because biophysical studies of many mutant channels responsible for long QT syndrome have shown that even subtle alterations in ion channel function can elicit life-threatening arrhythmias.

Electrical remodeling manifests in several ways, but none more prominently than an increase in the electrocardiographic QT interval, a hallmark of abnormally long ventricular repolarization that correlates with the risk of arrhythmias.3-5 Repolarization at the level of a myocyte is the sum of multiple and counteracting repolarizing and depolarizing currents during an action potential, each carried by a specific ion channel. A delicate balance between the opposing depolarizing and repolarizing forces underlies normal repolarization and can be adjusted in either direction for specific physiological purposes by various modulators. As sympathetic stimulation accelerates heart rate, for example, repolarization is enhanced by the actions of the β-adrenergic-activated protein kinase A on the KCNQ1 K+ channel6; IKs activity increases and the action potential duration thus shortens to meet the requirements demanded by the increased heart rate. The heart is not just a bunch of individual cells, however. Proper electrical activity also depends on the efficient and coordinated communication among cells throughout the entire organ, a result of various specialized cell-cell connections.

The delicate balance between repolarization and depolarization that assures proper electrical activity, so essential for physiological adaptation, can be perturbed with dire consequences. Mutations altering ion channel function or the action of a channel modulator are the root of various inherited cardiac arrhythmias such as long QT syndrome, Brugada syndrome, or catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. In these cases, abnormal baseline cardiac electrical activity is the substrate for specific triggers that initiate life-threatening arrhythmias. In the failing heart, subject to increased wall stress and neurohormonal feedback attempting to compensate for decreased cardiac output, physiological signaling mechanisms go awry and change the expression of certain channels or their modulators; the resulting ion channel remodeling is often very similar to what occurs with inherited arrhythmias.

Current pharmacologic treatments designed to address the neurohormonal abnormalities associated with HF do partially correct electrical remodeling and/or prevent the arrhythmogenic triggers, but arrhythmogenic SCD remains a major problem in HF. Thus, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, which successfully reduce mortality from SCD in patients with impaired left ventricular function,7-9 have become an additional therapeutic option, but the absolute mortality benefit provided by implantable cardioverter defibrillators is relatively small. Clearly, there is a pressing need for new approaches and solutions.

The Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, in the accompanying series of review articles, has taken on the challenges of examining where we are and of exploring where we may be going in the quest for new pharmacologic therapies aimed at the treatment of arrhythmogenesis in HF. Opportunities abound for new therapeutic interventions that build on the growing understanding of ion channels and electrical remodeling during HF by targeting ion channels and their regulatory partners. Starting with an examination of how neurohormonal activation can be a potent and multifaceted ion channel regulator and ending with an in-depth analysis of one drug that holds promise for affecting arrhythmogenesis in HF through targeting a specific ion channel defect, this eight-article series succeeds in identifying many of these opportunities and sets the stage for further investigation.

Kurokawa and Abriel begin with a discussion about how activation of the HF-triggered activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and the sympathetic catecholaminergic system modulate ion channel expression through both genomic effects and nongenomic effects. They describe the link between neurohormonal activation-the sine qua non of HF and what is now understood to be responsible for many of its adverse consequences-and ion channel dysfunction and remodeling. With this background, they address how some current HF therapies such as aldosterone antagonists may have direct effects on arrhythmogenesis.10

A pair of articles then discusses the role of ion channels and key cytoskeletal elements associated with channels that participate in mechanotransduction, the process by which the forces of cellular strain associated with a hypertrophying and dilating heart are transmitted to the cytoplasm and thereby alter myocyte function. Nilsson and Bennett focus on signaling microdomains and force transduction with a particular emphasis on ankyrins. These scaffolding proteins serve as critical spatial organizers for a variety of ion channels and transporters and ankyrin dysfunction has been found to underlie human disease.11 Stiber et al review mechanosenstive (stretch-activated) channels, which are instrumental in transducing the aberrant cellular forces associated with HF into cellular signaling pathways. With a particular spotlight on TRPC channels, they discuss the possibilities of stretch-activated channels as therapeutic targets in HF.

The next two articles address the role of ion channel regulators. Bers and Grandi summarize the modulatory effects of Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII) on cardiac ion channels function, discussing CaMKII actions on the sarcolemmal L-type Ca2+ channel, the sarcoplasmic reticulum ryanodine receptor, the cardiac Na+ channel NaV1.5, and the pore-forming subunit for the transient outward K+ channel, Ito. With so many targets crucial to the cardiac action potential, this review helps elucidate a spate of recent reports from several groups showing that CaMKII activity promotes maladaptive responses in HF.12 Gonazalez et al describe new developments in the understanding of posttranslational protein modification by nitrosylation and its consequent regulatory functions with a specific emphasis on components of the excitation-contraction machinery. The recent discovery that a scaffold for nitric oxide synthase (the enzyme that generates the nitric oxide behind nitrosylation), syntrophin, is a long QT syndrome locus13 that shows nitrosylation may be a key regulator of arrhythmogenesis and is especially relevant because nitric oxide synthase activity is affected by HF.

The series then turns to gap junctions in an article by Hesketh et al. These cell-cell communication channels, which allow coordinated, rapid communication and the fast spread of electrical activity among cardiac myocytes, may be new therapeutic targets given that dynamic altered gap junction function and expression are associated with arrhythmogenesis.

The final two articles get to the heart of the matter at hand by focusing on specific therapies for HF that target cardiovascular ion channels. Doshi and Marx provide an overview of recently described or proposed treatments that target a variety of channels, transporters, and pumps. Ranolazine, a blocker of the late Na+ current that may be arrhythmogenic in HF, is the subject of the review by Maier. Both of these reviews balance discussions of the pharmacology and physiology in the context of data from recent clinical trials.

It has been a pleasure and an honor to serve as the Guest Editor for this review series. I want to express my gratitude first to the authors of these interesting articles and then to the dedicated and expert group of outside reviewers for their helpful comments and insight. I believe the authors of the collected reviews would echo my sentiments that I sincerely hope and anticipate that this series serves as an educational boost for promoting further efforts into the development and treatment of SCD.

References

1. Hunt SA, Abraham WT, Chin MH, et al. 2009 focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2005 guidelines for the diagnosis and management of heart failure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: developed in collaboration with the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Circulation. 2009;119:e391-e479.
2. Nattel S, Maguy A, Le Bouter S, et al. Arrhythmogenic ion-channel remodeling in the heart: heart failure, myocardial infarction, and atrial fibrillation. Physiol Rev. 2007;87:425-456.
3. Vrtovec B, Delgado R, Zewail A, et al. Prolonged QTc interval and high B-type natriuretic peptide levels together predict mortality in patients with advanced heart failure. Circulation. 2003;107:1764-1769.
4. Tomaselli GF, Beuckelmann DJ, Calkins HG, et al. Sudden cardiac death in heart failure. The role of abnormal repolarization. Circulation. 1994;90:2534-2539.
5. Akar FG, Rosenbaum DS. Transmural electrophysiological heterogeneities underlying arrhythmogenesis in heart failure. Circ Res. 2003;93:638-645.
6. Marx SO, Kurokawa J, Reiken S, et al. Requirement of a macromolecular signaling complex for beta adrenergic receptor modulation of the KCNQ1-KCNE1 potassium channel. Science. 2002;295:496-499.
7. Moss AJ, Zareba W, Hall WJ, et al; the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II Investigators. Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:877-883.
8. Bardy GH, Lee KL, Mark DB, et al; the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT) Investigators. Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:225-237.
9. Kadish A, Dyer A, Daubert JP, et al; the Defibrillators in Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Treatment Evaluation I. Prophylactic defibrillator implantation in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2151-2158.
10. Pitt B, Krum H, Niclau JC, et al. The EPHESUS trial effect of eplerenone in patients with a baseline history of hypertension. Circulation. 2003;108(Suppl):599
11. Mohler PJ, Schott JJ, Gramolini AO, et al. Ankyrin-B mutation causes type 4 long-QT cardiac arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death. Nature. 2003;421:634-639.
12. Couchonnal LF, Anderson ME. The role of calmodulin kinase II in myocardial physiology and disease. Physiology. 2008;23:151-159.
13. Ueda K, Valdivia C, Medeiros-Domingo A, et al. Syntrophin mutation associated with long QT syndrome through activation of the nNOS-SCN5A macromolecular complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:9355-9360.
© 2009 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.