Task switching paradigms involve subjects being asked to shift mental resources between different cognitive tasks. Under some circumstances, subjects when asked to perform a simple cognitive task as quickly as possible will respond substantially slower if before this they have recently performed a different cognitive task. In task-switching studies this increased delay in reaction time is often termed as the “switch cost.”1 These costs are assumed to reflect the executive control processes required for the coordination of multiple tasks. Here, we use functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine brain activation to a letter-digit pair task switching paradigm. This paradigm is similar to that of Rogers and Monsell2 and that used in the fMRI study of Kimberg,3 where letter-digit pairs are displayed and subjects must switch between consonant-vowel and odd-even judgment tasks.
In this paper we investigate the effect of a specific subclass of flavonoids—known as flavanols—on the fMRI blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) response4 to task switching. Cocoa is derived from the seeds of the fruit of the Theobroma cacao tree, and certain cocoas can be manufactured to be extraordinarily rich in flavanols. However, cocoa containing high flavanol content is relatively difficult to obtain due to common postharvest handling and processing procedures used in the food industry that can dramatically reduce the flavanol content of chocolate and cocoa.5
The fMRI BOLD response reflects the change in blood oxygenation in active brain regions. This oxygenation change arises from a complex imbalance of increases in cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume, and cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen consumption. Flavanols have been suggested to cause an increase in blood flow.6,7 If flavanols act to alter cerebral blood flow, then this effect alone will modulate the resting BOLD signal and potentially alter the magnitude of the BOLD response. Therefore, in this study we also perform an arterial spin labeling (ASL) magnetic resonance imaging study to produce quantitative measurements of CBF after ingestion of flavanols.
Sixteen young female subjects between the ages of 18 and 30 years participated in the study under the following exclusion criteria: no history of migraines, stroke, hypertension, diabetes, or any neurological or vascular disease, and no use of tobacco products. All subjects had normal vision and normal color vision, were not dyslexic, were right handed and their first language used the “Roman” alphabet. Subjects' average daily caffeine intake was estimated from their responses to a dietary questionnaire and they were all classified as low caffeine users (<120 mg/day). All subjects were instructed to refrain from alcohol and caffeine, or from using any medication for 12 hours before each visit for the fMRI measurements. The local Medical School Research Ethics Committee approved this study and all subjects gave informed written consent before taking part in the study.
Each subject underwent two fMRI sessions that were repeated at least 14 days apart. Subjects were randomized to receive a high flavanol cocoa drink (172 mg flavanols per drink) (Cocoapro™ cocoa, Mars, Incorporated) for 5 days before one fMRI session and a low flavanol cocoa drink (13 mg flavanols per drink) for 5 days before the other session in a double blind counterbalanced manner. These will be referred to hereafter as “high flavanols” and “low flavanols.” Subjects consumed one drink per day at a set time for the 5 days before each scan session, with the final drink being consumed approximately 1.5 hours before the fMRI scan.
Subjects were pretrained to perform 2 tasks, a letter task of odd-even judgment and a number task requiring consonant-vowel judgment. In the letter task subjects learnt to respond to single letter stimuli depending on whether the letter displayed was a consonant (G, K, M, R) or a vowel (A, E, O, U). Subjects were trained to press a left button in response to a vowel and right button for a consonant. In the number task, subjects were trained to respond to digits that were either odd (3, 5, 7, 9) or even (2, 4, 6, 8), using left and right button responses, respectively.
Once subjects were familiarized with the rules of the letter and number tasks, they were trained on the letter-digit pairs task to be performed in the fMRI study. The letter-digit pairs task consisted of a letter and a digit displayed simultaneously on a computer screen (for the fMRI scanning a projector and screen were used). The letter-digit pairs were either red or blue. When letter-digit pairs were presented in red, subjects were instructed to attend to the letter and respond by pressing the appropriate button as trained (ie, applying the rule for categorizing as vowel or consonant). If the letter-digit pair was blue they responded to the digit (odd-even judgment) in a similar manner.
In this study the definition of the “switch” task is the changing between the 2 sets of rules, 1 for the letters (consonant-vowel judgment) and 1 for digits (odd-even judgment). To create a paradigm comprising of “switch” and “nonswitch” conditions, the letter-digit pairs were grouped into blocks. A block of 5 letter-digit pairs, all of the same color is a “nonswitch” block. A block of 5 letter-digit pairs alternating between red and blue stimuli (and so reconfiguring task judgement) is a “switch” block. The gap between each letter-digit pair within the block was 3 seconds, giving a total block length of 15 seconds, this was then followed by a 12 second fixation cross (baseline condition). The blocks were presented alternately (ie, “switch” block, “nonswitch” block, “switch” block, “nonswitch” block, etc.). The presentation of letter-digit pairs within a block helps to increase the switch cost and so also increase the magnitude of the fMRI BOLD response, while the 12 second interval between the blocks allows the BOLD response to return to baseline.
Before the fMRI study the subjects were trained to a competent level (error rates below 5%) in the task by performing 5 blocks of “switch” and “nonswitch” trials. During the fMRI study 20 blocks of “switch” trials and 20 blocks of “nonswitch” trials were performed in the study, resulting in a total study duration of 18 minutes.
A 3.0 T purpose-built scanner was used with TEM head coil and insert head gradient coil. T2*-weighted coronal echo-planar images (EPI) with a 128×64 matrix size, 3 mm in-plane resolution and 9 mm slice thickness were acquired using MBEST acquisition sequence with 30 ms echo time and 1.9 kHz gradient switching frequency. Sixteen contiguous coronal slices were acquired every 3 seconds (repetition time=3 s). Throughout the study subjects' reaction time and error rate data were recorded. Further the subjects' heart rate was monitored. After the fMRI study, a 64 slice EPI set was acquired to aid anatomic localization.
fMRI Data Processing
The fMRI data was processed using SPM998 (Statistical Parametric Mapping, Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, UK). The raw data from the scanner was motion corrected to realign all functional slices to the first volume of the data set, and spatially normalized to the standard EPI template. Eight millimeters full-width half-maximum spatial smoothing and 128 seconds high-pass filter cut-off were applied.
A general linear model design matrix was created within SPM99 that modeled the paradigm. “Switch” and “nonswitch” blocks were modeled as 12 second box-car-top-hat functions. The paradigm time course was then convolved with the canonical hemodynamic response function and its temporal derivative. Statistical parametric maps (SPMs) of the “switch” condition and “nonswitch” condition versus baseline were formed. In addition, direct comparison between the 2 activation conditions (ie, “switch” vs. baseline and “nonswitch” vs. baseline) was also performed at a corrected significance level of P<0.05, with the respective activation versus baseline comparisons (“switch” vs. baseline and “nonswitch” vs. baseline) being used as a mask.
CBF Measurements and Analysis
In this initial study on 4 subjects (24 to 31 y) we assessed the time course of the effect of flavanol-rich cocoa on brain-blood flow. A CBF map was acquired using an Echo-Planar MR Imaging and Signal Targeting with Alternating Radiofrequency ASL sequence on 5 multi-slice axial 7 mm slices. Diffusion weighting (b=5 mm2/s) was applied for suppression of intra-arterial spins. A hyperbolic secant pulse was used for the labeling, and the tag and control slabs were 9 cm in width with an inversion time of 1400 ms. The Echo-Planar MR Imaging and Signal Targeting with Alternating Radiofrequency sequence was implemented with TR of 3 seconds between tag and control images, and a total of 60 tag and control pairs were acquired. Each subject underwent CBF imaging before and at 2, 4, and 6 hours after ingestion of a high flavanols cocoa drink (516 mg flavanol) or a low flavanols cocoa drink (39 mg flavanol), on two separate occasions. In this study, in contrast to the fMRI study, a single dose of the drinks was consumed on only one occasion. Each CBF measurement was followed by the acquisition of a T1 map for segmentation of brain tissue types and gray matter territories.
Cerebral blood flow data were first segmented into gray and white matter regions using masks generated from the T1 map. Gray matter CBF maps were then further segmented into territories fed by major vessels.9 Mean cerebral blood flow values were then calculated for white and gray matter regions. Whole gray matter perfusion values are presented here.
Behavioral Results for Task Switching Paradigm
Robust switch costs in response times were observed. Each of the subjects was numerically slower for the “switch” condition than “nonswitch” condition, both for the letter and number tasks, the constant switching from one task rule to the other proving difficult. The mean reaction times across the group for the “switch” and “nonswitch” blocks are shown in Figure 1. The significance of the switch cost was P=5×10−6 for “low flavonols” and P=1×10−6 for “high flavonols”. There was no significant difference in the switch cost between the two drinks (P=0.30). The average switch cost was 224±25 ms.
The possibility that during the 40 blocks of “switch” and “nonswitch” trials of the fMRI study the subjects would either make more or less errors as they either became fatigued or improved due to learning effects was also investigated. Analysis of the reaction time responses revealed that no significant fatigue/learning effects occurred over the course of the fMRI sessions (P=0.74). Also the drink order was randomized and a comparison of the reaction time responses between first and second scanning sessions made, this again revealed no significant differences (P=0.73).
Heart Rate Results for Task Switching Paradigm
The mean heart rate for the “switch” and “nonswitch” conditions for the low and high flavanol cocoa drinks was measured as shown in Table 1. Paired t-tests were performed to determine any differences in heart rate between the “switch” and “nonswitch” conditions; for both drinks there was a significant increase in heart rate for the “switch” condition compared with “nonswitch” condition (“low flavonols”: “switch”>“nonswitch” P=0.01; “high flavonols”: “switch”>“nonswitch” P=0.0009). No significant difference in heart rate was found between the low and high flavanols drinks.
fMRI Results for Task Switching Paradigm
Figure 2A shows the group statistical parametric map for the switch task versus baseline at a corrected probability of P<0.05. The “switch” and “nonswitch” versus baseline conditions revealed activation in the medial and lateral prefrontal cortex (including the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex), parietal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and cerebellum.
The brain areas outlined above have previously been shown to be associated with task switching.10–12 Further, a number of cognitive neuroimaging studies aside from task-switching have found similar patterns of activation. These include working memory,13,14 memory retrieval,15,16 and arithmetic problem solving tasks.17,18 All such tasks demonstrate strong prefrontal-parietal interconnections,19,20 suggesting that these 2 areas may serve complementary roles in high-level cognition.
Figure 2B shows the group statistical map of areas of activation which show significantly increased BOLD response during the “switch” task relative to the “nonswitch” task. From this comparison, it can be seen that those brain areas activated preferentially to the “switch” condition are largely localized in the right hemisphere, in the dorsolateral prefrontal and parietal cortices, as well as the ACC and cerebellum.
In task-switching it is thought that the ACC detects conflict in a task-setting,21 the right frontal cortex plays a role related to the inhibition of irrelevant (preceding) responses,22 and the active maintenance of information that is newly loaded into working memory.23 The right posterior parietal cortex has widely been shown to be responsible for spatial or visual attention,24 while the cerebellum is thought to be primarily activated with timing irregularity in the switch task, consistent with its role as an internal timing system.25 These are areas that have previously been shown to be associated with switching into a response suppression mode, attention allocation, and processing of response conflict as well as overcoming prior response suppression, respectively.10–12
Statistical comparison of the BOLD signal change between the “low flavonols” and “high flavonols” conditions revealed that the “high flavanol” generated a significantly greater BOLD signal change for both the activation (“switch” and “nonswitch”) versus baseline conditions and for the comparison of “switch” versus baseline with “nonswitch” versus baseline condition. Table 2 shows the average percentage signal change for the “switch” BOLD response relative to baseline, for selected regions of interest, after ingestion of “low” and “high” flavanols drinks.
CBF Timecourse Results
Figure 3 shows the time course of the mean cerebral blood flow response across gray matter after ingestion of the low and high flavanols drinks. It can be seen that there was an increase in cerebral blood flow in response to the high flavanols drink, with a peak in the cerebral blood flow response occurring at approximately 2 hours postingestion, and CBF returning to baseline after approximately 6 hours. It should be noted that in this study an acute dose of flavanol-rich cocoa was given, in contrast to the repeated dose given in the fMRI study.
ASL studies have previously been performed to measure the effects of hypercapnia, which induces cerebral vasodilation and CBF increases. Such studies have shown a CBF increase from 30% up to 87% in response to an expiration breath hold, which leads to an instantaneous increase in PaCO2.26–28 Direct effects of inhalation of 5% CO2 as a vasodilative stimulus have revealed global CBF increases of approximately 87%.29 The 60% CBF changes shown here at 2 hours postingestion of the high flavanols drink are of a similar order to these effects.
This study investigated the effect of flavanol-rich cocoa on both the behavioral and fMRI response to a cognitive task switching paradigm. Flavanol-rich cocoa had no significant effect on the reaction time, switch cost or error rate for the letter-digit pair switching task. However, a moderate dose (5 days of 150 mg flavanols per day) of flavanol-rich cocoa did modify the BOLD response to task switching. The BOLD response was significantly increased for the high flavanols drink when compared with low flavanols drink. No change in heart rate was found in the presence of flavanol-rich cocoa.
The BOLD response is a function of both neural activity and changes in vascular tone through coupling of neural activity to hemodynamic responses (alterations in cerebral blood flow and volume).13,14 Thus any physiologic condition that influences either of these components will cause a change in the BOLD signal. The increase in BOLD response in the presence of the high flavanols drink could therefore arise either as a result of altered neuronal activity, or a change in vascular responsiveness, or both—the net effect then being dependent on which of the two effects is dominant.
Results of the pilot cerebral blood flow study show that an acute dose of flavanol-rich cocoa causes an increase in cerebral blood flow. This finding supports previous research studies in vitro in animal models,15 and in humans6,7 which have provided evidence for an action of cocoa flavanols on endothelial dysfunction with a boost in the synthesis of nitric oxide by blood vessels. In studies of ingestion of flavanol-rich cocoa, Heiss et al6 showed an increase in flow-mediated vasodilation of the brachial artery after 5 minutes of ischemia, a response that correlated with biochemical evidence of increased nitric oxide bioavailability. Further, work by Fisher et al, also described in this supplement shows that flavanol-rich cocoa induced dilatation of the vessels of the finger in the normal volunteers after flavanol-rich cocoa, an effect which was reversed completely by an arginine analog that blocks nitric oxide synthesis.7
fMRI studies have investigated the effects of known vasoconstrictors and vasodilators on the BOLD signal. Morton et al used the vasoconstrictor theophylline in rats, and showed a decrease in the resting state BOLD signal, while the BOLD response was increased.16 Several studies of the effects of caffeine (a cerebral vasoconstrictor) have shown an increase in the BOLD response,17–19 although this effect has not been consistently demonstrated.20 The vasodilator acetazolamide has been shown to increase the resting state BOLD signal and decrease the BOLD response in humans.21
In this study, it might be thought that in the absence of behavioral correlates (as evident by the lack of modulation of the switch cost), the pharmacological effects of flavanol-rich cocoas on the BOLD signal are of cerebrovascular origin. However, fMRI might be more informative than behavior as an indicator of underlying neurocognitive function.22 BOLD changes might be related to cognitive changes, such as adaptations of strategy formation or cognitive effort, which are not manifest in standard behavioral measures such as response accuracy or latency. Furthermore, it is possible that in the present study the healthy young subjects were already performing at a high level of cognitive ability, which would be very difficult to improve upon. Thus no improvement in reaction time was seen. This could be tested in a subsequent investigation by assessing the effects of the cocoa flavanols in people whose cognitive performance was impaired temporarily due to fatigue.
This study demonstrates that the BOLD response to a cognitive task switching paradigm is significantly increased in the presence of flavanol-rich cocoa. No effects on behavioral responses or heart rate were evident. Arterial spin labeling cerebral blood flow measurements revealed an increase in blood flow after ingestion of flavanol-rich cocoa, with a peak in this response occurring 2 hours after ingestion. The effect of flavanol-rich cocoa on the BOLD response could be mediated by effects on the cerebral vasoactivity rather than direct effects on neurons, or by adaptations of strategy formation or cognitive effort, or a combination of these effects. The fact that flavanol-rich cocoa has been shown to increase blood flow to key areas of the brain suggests the potential to use cocoa flavanols for treatment of vascular impairment, including dementia and strokes, and thus for maintaining cardiovascular health.
Characterization of the flavanols content of the cocoa products used in this study was provided by the Analytical and Applied Sciences group of Mars, Incorporated. The authors thank Stephen French and Amar Indamar of Mars, Incorporated for their contributions to this work.
1. Monsell S. Task switching. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003;7:134–139.
2. Kimberg DY, Aguirre GK, D'Esposito M. Modulation of task-related neural activity in task-switching: an fMRI study. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2000;10:189–196.
3. Rogers RD, Monsell S. Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1995;124:207–231.
4. Ogawa S, Tank DW, Menon R, et al. Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:5951–5955.
5. Haslam E. Quinone tanning and oxidative polymerization. In: Haslam E, ed. Practical Polyphenolics: From Structure to Molecular Recognition and Physiological Action. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 1998:335–373.
6. Heiss C, Dejam A, Kleinbongard P, et al. Vascular effects of cocoa
rich in flavan-3-ols. JAMA. 2003;290:1030–1031.
7. Fisher NDL, Hughes M, Gerhard-Herman M, et al. Flavanol-rich cocoa
induces nitric-oxide-dependent vasodilation in healthy humans. J Hypertens. 2003;21:2281–2286.
8. Friston KJ, Frith CD, Frackowaik RS, et al. Characterizing dynamic brain responses with fMRI: a multivariate approach. Neuroimage. 1995;2:166–172.
9. Yen Y-F, Field AS, Martin EM, et al. Test-retest reproducibility of quantitative CBF measurements using FAIR perfusion MRI and acetazolamide challenge. Magn Reson Med. 2001;47:921–928.
10. Lewis PA, Miall RC. Distinct systems for automatic and cognitively controlled time measurement: evidence from neuroimaging. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2003;13:250–255.
11. Sohn MH, Ursu S, Anderson JR, et al. The role of the prefrontal cortex and posterior parietal cortex in task switching. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:13448–13453.
12. Swainson R, Cunnington R, Jackson GM, et al. Cognitive control mechanisms revealed by ERP and fMRI: evidence from repeated task-switching. J Cogn Neurosci. 2003;15:785–799.
13. Logothesis NK, Pauls J, Augath M, et al. Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature. 2001;412:150–157.
14. Raichle ME. Behind the scenes of functional brain imaging: a historical and physiological perspective. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:765–772.
15. Karim M, McCormick K, Kappagoda CT. Effects of cocoa
extracts on endothelium-dependent relaxation. J Nutr. 2000;130(Suppl):2105–2108.
16. Morton DW, Maravilla KR, Meno JR, et al. Altered resting blood flow may mediate theophylline augmentation of the BOLD response. Proc Int Soc Mag Reson Med. 2000;8:445.
17. Mulderink TA, Gitelman DR, Mesulam MM, et al. On the use of caffeine as a contrast booster for BOLD fMRI studies. Neuroimage. 2002;15:37–44.
18. Laurienti PJ, Field AS, Burdette JH, et al. Dietary caffeine consumption modulates fMRI measures. Neuroimage. 2002;17:751–757.
19. Li TQ, Matthews VP. How can we make BOLD contrast bolder? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;23:507–508.
20. Laurienti PJ, Field AS, Burdette JH, et al. Relationship between caffeine-induced changes in resting cerebral perfusion and blood oxygenation level-dependent signal. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24:1607–1611.
21. Bruhn H, Kleinschmidt A, Boecker H, et al. The effect of acetazolamide on regional cerebral blood oxygenation at rest and under stimulation as assessed by MRI. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1994;14:742–748.
22. Wilkinson D, Halligan P. Opinion: the relevance of behavioural measures for functional-imaging studies of cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004;5:67–73.
23. Goldman-Rakic PS. Topography of cognition: parallel distributed networks in primate association cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1988;11:137–156.
24. Rushworth MFS, Paus T, Sipila PK. Attention systems and the organisation of the human parietal cortex. J Neurosci. 2001;21:5262–5271.
25. Ivry RB. The representation of temporal information in perception and motor control. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1996;6:851–857.
26. Li TQ, Moseley ME, Glover G. A FAIR study of motor cortex activation under normo- and hypercapnia induced by breath challenge. Neuroimage. 1999;10:562–569.
27. Li TQ, Kastrup A, Takahashi AM, et al. Functional MRI of human brain during breath holding by BOLD and FAIR techniques. Neuroimage. 1999;9:243–249.
28. Kastrup A, Li TQ, Glover GH, et al. Cerebral blood flow-related signal changes during breath-holding. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999;20:1233–1238.
29. Kastrup A, Kruger G, Neumann-Haefelin T, et al. Assessment of cerebrovascular reactivity with functional magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of CO(2) and breath holding. Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;19:13–20.